Are the Rockies Finally Ready to Rebuild?

The Colorado Rockies do weird things. Whether it’s reorganizing the front office in a way that puts the GM in charge of the farm system instead of the major league roster or having the new GM put an office in the clubhouse, they operate in a way that is unusual for an MLB franchise. Even their player personnel decisions can be a bit odd; heads were certainly scratched after the team made Michael Cuddyer a qualifying offer on Monday, for instance.

The big knock on the Rockies is that they seem unable to commit to a direction or a purpose. Despite four straight losing seasons, they’ve been unwilling to attempt to rebuild, rebuffing offers for not just their star players but for expensive role players like Jorge de la Rosa. Making Cuddyer the qualifying offer appeared to be yet another sign of a team that seems intent on trying to keep the pieces in place together, despite the fact that there’s mounting evidence that this roster just isn’t good enough to contend.

Except maybe extending the qualifying offer to Cuddyer didn’t mean that. A few days after that decision was made, Ken Rosenthal reported that the team has “their eyes and ears open” to potential trades for both Troy Tulowitzki and Carlos Gonzalez, a significant change in stance, as previously both players had been off-limits to suitors. You don’t let teams know that your two best players are finally available if you don’t think there’s a real chance you could trade either or both, and so it seems like the Rockies are finally ready to shake things up and try something different.

So, why make the 35 year old Cuddyer a qualifying offer if you’re planning on blowing things up? Because the calculations for making a QO for a rebuilding team are quite a bit different than for a team that expected to need to maximize payroll efficiency.

Cuddyer’s open market value is probably somewhere in the $10 million range on a two or three year deal, so making him an offer of $15 million for one year means that the team has committed to overpaying by a few million if he accepts the offer. But having an overpaid player that other teams still want isn’t the worst thing in the world for a rebuilding team, as they could simply pay part of his 2015 salary to make him a more desirable trade chip over the summer. With spending restrictions on signing amateur talent, paying the salaries of veteran players to acquire prospects in trade is one of the few ways left to essentially buy talent. Even if Cuddyer accepts the qualifying offer, the Rockies could likely flip him for something of value as long as they kick in a few million dollars, so having him accept isn’t really that harmful to the franchise.

And if he turns it down and gives a contender a discount in annual salary in order to get the multi-year deal he prefers, then the Rockies will receive a compensatory pick in next summer’s draft. Either way, they’d get the chance to add some young talent to the organization. Keeping Cuddyer at $15 million is only really an issue if having him on the books prevented them from making other necessary upgrades, but if they’re trading Tulowitzki and Gonzalez, few free agents of note would have been interested in taking their money to begin with. If you’re blowing things up, it’s better to have expensive trade chips that you can pay down in trade rather than having a bunch of unspent money that no one wants to take.

While it might seem counterintuitive, making the qualifying offer to Cuddyer actually makes more sense in the wake of the news about the availability of Tulowitzki and Gonzalez. It seems like perhaps new GM Jeff Bridich has finally convinced ownership of the need to rebuild, and perhaps the Rockies can start to commit to a direction and stick with it for once. While both Tulo and Gonzalez dealt with injuries again, and both have proven to be quite fragile, putting them on the market this winter actually seems to make some sense, rather than trying to let both prove that they’re healthy before accepting bids.

The idea of keeping both stars until they’re healthy in order to raise their market value seems wise, but let’s think about the logistics of what that might actually look like; in any scenario where both Tulo and CarGo are healthy and playing well, the Rockies are probably also probably a semi-competitive team. After all, they did go 16-12 in April when Tulo was tearing the cover off the ball, and even though this isn’t a great team when both are healthy, it will be a more difficult decision to move either player while the team hangs around the periphery of the Wild Card race.

With a healthy Tulo and CarGo, the Rockies are good enough to convince themselves to not blow things up; the reality of the necessary rebuild only becomes obvious when those two are not able to take the field, exposing a weak supporting cast that can’t make up for the loss of the team’s best players. The dream scenario of being able to trade both players at the peak of their value is probably unrealistic, because at the peak of their value, ownership is going to remember why they’ve been previously unwilling to trade them, and commence the annual spinning of their wheels.

The Rockies best chance to get out of this death spiral is to trade both players now. A weak free agent class on the position player side of things will help drive up demand for the team’s two star hitters, even as both have questions surrounding their health. Teams are more inclined to make blockbuster deals in the offseason anyway, and with teams like Boston actively looking to exchange multiple players for a controllable star, there are teams who will likely take the risk on the health of a younger star rather than taking the risk on a long-term deal for an aging free agent.

After all, while the talking points always center around Tulowitzki’s health, keep in mind that he posted a +5 WAR season in 2014 even while playing just 91 games, and he was over over +5 WAR in 126 games in 2013 as well. Over the last two years, while combining for just 887 plate appearances, Tulo still ranks 11th among position players in WAR. You pay for production, and Tulo’s health risks are offset by his absurd ability to play well when he’s on the field.

Even with the injury problems, Tulowitzki is one of the game’s premier players, and his contract is still well below market value. Shin-Soo Choo got $140 million over seven years last winter; Tulo is due $15 million less than that even if his seventh year option is picked up, which would likely mean that he stayed healthy enough to be worth keeping. Jose Reyes got $102 million over six years coming off an excellent season shortened by injury, and that was three years ago; baseball salaries have only gone up since.

There will be a strong market for Troy Tulowitzki, and Gonzalez should be able to fetch a decent return as well, especially if the Rockies pick up some of the cost of his salary. We’ll deal with a fair return for both players in another post, but for now, I’d suggest that Rockies fans should take this as somewhat promising news. A directionless franchise might actually be ready to commit to an overdue rebuild. Things might really be changing in Colorado for once.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

118 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jose
9 years ago

I wonder whats the asking price. As good as Tulo is, he is not a sell-the-farm kind of guy right now.

arc
9 years ago
Reply to  Jose

Even with injuries, he has posted 5+ WAR in five of the previous six seasons. He’s projected for 6 WAR next year. He’s absolutely a sell-the-farm superstar.

Jose
9 years ago
Reply to  arc

He is 30, performance should be expected to start to trend down and injuries up.

Jim Leyritz Elbow Protector
9 years ago
Reply to  arc

He’s finished exactly one of the past four seasons healthy. If you’re going to trade the elite cost controlled pieces and pay him that contract you need him to be on the field when the games matter. So even with the elite production, the injuries absolutely matter and are the primary reason why the return will be relatively limited.

Enemy of the State
9 years ago

5 War is 5 war. Doesn’t matter how its distributed.

vivalajeter
9 years ago

Enemy, the whole point of doing well in the regular season is to get to the playoffs. I think his point was that he’s been hurt at the end of the year so he wouldn’t be there in October.

When looking for a title, I’d much rather have someone miss all of April and be healthy the rest of the year, instead of being healthy through August and getting shut down on September 1.

vivalajeter
9 years ago
Reply to  arc

That 6 WAR projection is based on 146 games. He hasn’t been in that many games since 2009.

Avattoir
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Oh, for crying out loud … you should go work for the RNC; they LOVE the Big Lie.

Johnston
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

You meant the DNC.

Steve
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

I think he means the U.S. government in general.

Hingle McCringleberry
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Baseball! Politics!

They go together like lamb and tuna fish.

channelclemente
9 years ago
Reply to  arc

He’s not on the field enough to even advertise the farm. He’s a luxury they can’t afford.

james
9 years ago
Reply to  Jose

I disagree. He is a sell your farm sort of player even with the injury risk.

You would need to be a contending team with a hole at SS, a medicocre to poor farm (no matter the offer the twins are no dealing Sano and Bruxton), and a willingness to take on 10-20m per season (depending on how much would be eaten by the rockies).

Lets be nice and say Tulo has an expected WAR of 5 for the next 2 years, then sees a normal aging curve of about .5 war lost per season (32 is about right to see a deline). That means over the next 6 years he will generate roughly 25. On the market that is worth in the range of 7-8m per win share, so between 150-200m. His contract at 16m per year for 6 years is still substancially lower than his expected win share.

A top 20 prospect is worth about 25m (using rough expected win share times the market rate win share).

Giving Tulo a surplus value of about 40m is not unrealistic, that would be a top 25 prospect, a top 50 prospect and maybe some lesser guys. That sounds like the whole system for a lot of teams.

This is predicated on the buying team doing a few sort of wacky things- first thinking that there is a large enough market they need to pay full price. second, be willing to pay full price. Thrid, evaluating Tulo in a fairly beneficial way (i was generous with the aging curve of an injury prone 30 year old).

Looking at a few examples:
Dodgers- With Hanley walking, and Dee gordon a likely better fit at 2nd, they have a need. Their surplus is OF, so bad for the rockies, but the rockies would be looking to deal their older OF surplus too, so not terrible if they get younger. Pederson and Urias would be about the right amount of value. So they do not sell the farm since that would still leave the dodgers with a solid group in the minors.

Yankees- Better example. Weak group in the minors, no clear internal guy (they will be going either FA and getting Hanley/Drew or trading), surplus cash (jeter was making north of 10m last year so not a big uptick in cost to Tulo). They also have a weak system. This is a team that may be doing more than just selling the Farm (i love Aaron Judge, but that is a bad overall farm system full of guys with 2nd division starter type upside guys. ie mason williams). Would the rockies do Tulo for Severino, Judge, Mateo and Bird (their top 4 prospects according to baseball america). Severino is a solid headliner, and i really like judge, but those 2 alone are clearly not enough. Gary Sanchez has been struggling, so the rest of the system is not very good

Sox- This is a terrible idea. Xander is still young with use upside but this is a team with money, a hole at 3rd (so i think signing hanley is a better move for them), and a player in Xander who can move to 3b.

vivalajeter
9 years ago
Reply to  james

I know you were trying to be optimistic with the aging curve, and your examples are assuming that some teams would be that optimistic. So you’re not necessarily saying that *you* believe he’ll age like that. But I have to wonder whether any team would assume 25 WAR over the next 6 years.

He’s 30 years old, and he put up 28.8 WAR over the last 6 years (age 24-29). You’d have to be pretty high on him to think that he’d put up ~90% of his 24-29 value in his 30-35 seasons.

Over his career (not counting his cup of coffee in 2006), he’s averaged 4.3 WAR/year over 8 years, which would be about 26 WAR over 6 years.

So a team would really need to bank on him either maintaining his skills until his mid-30’s, with similar injuries. Or they’d need to bank on him staying healthy enough to offset diminishing skills.

Jim Price
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Someone will pay for that possibility he stays healthy and has an MVP type season.

Avattoir
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Definitely.

But even then, Tulo is SO good, even if Chance were to continue to send him to the DL at the same rate as it has, it’s still more than possible for him to accumulate a HoF-level career WAR total.

Given the nature of the incidents that have taken him out in the last few years, I’d really want a definitive opinion from a medical expert before I’d be in the least receptive to the idea of Tulo being somehow more injury-prone that other good>great players of his age.

Dovif
9 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

The problem is that injury prone ss that has many injures in their 20s tends to decline quicker and have more injures in their 30s. 2 recent example is Reyes and garciaparra

Avattoir
9 years ago
Reply to  james

Is “injury prone” like a skill [albeit, a negative or reverse one]?

If so, do you say that in Tulo’s case, it’s a feature rather than a bug?

And if so, might we all please see your hypothesis stated in terms that allow for meaningful comparison, or testing, or both?

Plus – just a suggestion, but – examples from elsewhere in MLB history, or even more broadly from the world of professional team sports since concept arose in base ball and association football in the 19th century, which you assert as supporting your hypothesis [whatever it turns out to be] would be appreciated.

Avattoir
9 years ago
Reply to  Jose

It’s close to that, and won’t get closer. What a potential acquirer would look at is that its money is placed entirely on health: production rate is a mortal lock. Who’s best positioned for such a bet? Same as it ever was: the one team ALWAYS ‘best positioned’ in this sense. With Jeter freshly retired, Turlo won’t need to move his wardrobe away from pinstripes.