Bryce Harper’s Walkoff Grand Slam and Clutch Play
Last night, the Cubs entered the bottom the ninth inning with a 5-1 lead and a 98.3% chance of winning the game according to our Play Logs. After recording the first out, the win probability moved up to 99.4%, but after an error, three singles, and a hit batter, the Cubs’ lead was cut to 5-3 and Bryce Harper stepped up to the plate against Derek Holland with the bases loaded, and the Phillies’ win expectancy had moved up to 32.3%. Then it moved up to 100% when this happened:
As far as pitches go, it wasn’t necessarily a bad one. There have been over 500 pitches this season of at least 94 mph in a left-on-left matchup where the pitcher hit the inside corner or further inside. Only 35 such pitches resulted in base hits, with a .276 BABIP and .143 ISO. There were only four homers on pitches like that, and after last night, Harper has two of them, with another coming in June off Max Fried.
Harper’s homer last night took a long time to land.
For those Statcast aficionados out there, Harper hit the ball 113 mph with a launch angle of 40 degrees. There have only been 15 homers hit this season with an exit velocity of 110 mph or more with a launch angle of 35 degrees or more. Of those high-launch-angle swings, Harper’s homer was the hardest hit of the season. He seemed pretty pleased with himself.
The Win Expectancy Chart for the game looked like this:

Harper’s teammates also seemed to understand the importance of the chart.
With that one swing, Harper added 0.67 to his WPA on the season. While his 122 wRC+ is a good-not-great 45th out of 146 qualified batters, his WPA, which measures the direct results on the game that his hits and outs have impacted, ranks third.
| Name | Team | wRC+ | WPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Yelich | Brewers | 173 | 5.92 |
| Mike Trout | Angels | 186 | 5.12 |
| Bryce Harper | Phillies | 122 | 5.07 |
| Cody Bellinger | Dodgers | 172 | 4.95 |
| Freddie Freeman | Braves | 149 | 4.94 |
| Ronald Acuña Jr. | Braves | 135 | 4.25 |
| Michael Brantley | Astros | 147 | 4.07 |
| Xander Bogaerts | Red Sox | 142 | 4.05 |
| Max Muncy | Dodgers | 133 | 4.05 |
| Juan Soto | Nationals | 142 | 3.75 |
Harper has sequenced his positive contributions in enough big moments that his overall batting line doesn’t reflect the contributions his hits have made to the Phillies’ wins and losses. It’s made a major difference for the team this season as they have allowed 19 more runs than they’ve scored, and their BaseRuns record, which takes sequencing out, is 55-66, eight games worse than their actual record of 63-58, which puts them just a game out of the wild card race.
The Phillies and Harper don’t have any particular skill when it comes these “clutch” hits. Harper’s 176 wRC+ in high-leverage situations ranks ninth among hitters with at least 40 PA in those situations. Harper has the skills necessary to put up a 176 wRC+ in all situations, but it just so happens he’s bunched up that level of play in big spots. He is very much an outlier this season when we compare wRC+ and WPA.

We have a Clutch stat at FanGraphs which essentially measures a hitter’s performance in important situations versus his normal production. Harper is far and away the leader this season.
| Name | Team | wRC+ | WPA | Clutch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryce Harper | Phillies | 122 | 5.07 | 2 |
| Michael Brantley | Astros | 147 | 4.07 | 1.46 |
| Paul Goldschmidt | Cardinals | 106 | 3.06 | 1.45 |
| Alex Gordon | Royals | 94 | 1.53 | 1.42 |
| Jean Segura | Phillies | 96 | 2.28 | 1.37 |
| Mookie Betts | Red Sox | 126 | 3.5 | 1.18 |
| Xander Bogaerts | Red Sox | 142 | 4.05 | 1.17 |
| David Peralta | D-backs | 105 | 1.61 | 1.12 |
| Marwin Gonzalez | Twins | 93 | 0.83 | 1.08 |
| José Iglesias | Reds | 87 | 0.98 | 1.05 |
| David Fletcher | Angels | 101 | 1.33 | 1.04 |
This likely isn’t a measure of Harper’s particular skills to perform better in important situations. If he could perform better in clutch situations, it would behoove him to play like that all of the time. In addition, Harper’s career clutch score is 0.63, which means he was negative entering the season and he’s right around all other players. To further demonstrate the lack of clutch ability — or at least the lack of clutch ability once a player has made it through years of training and playing pressure-packed games as an amateur and in the minors and has put together a decently long pro career — the graph below shows all players since 1974 with at least 3,000 plate appearances with their offensive runs above average, i.e. their normal offensive production, and their WPA.

Nearly everybody’s numbers end up mirroring themselves. Maybe there’s some guys’ type of game that can produce incremental positive Clutch scores over a long period of time, like the situational hitting of Tony Gwynn or Pete Rose that produces singles might be worth a handful of runs per year over a career, but those are very extreme cases. That doesn’t mean Harper’s season isn’t very unusual. The scatter plot below shows every qualified season since 1974 with a player’s Clutch score and their wRC+.

The giant blob should suggest that there’s not a correlation between good hitting and “Clutch” hitting at the major league level. That we can sort of make out where Harper’s season is in that giant blob indicates the season is a bit of an outlier. Out of around 6,500 qualified seasons, Harper’s clutch score as it stands today ranks 90th. Of the 90 players, Harper is currently one of only 32 players with a wRC+ of at least 120.
| Name | Season | Team | wRC+ | Clutch | WPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Pujols | 2006 | Cardinals | 174 | 3.26 | 9.62 |
| Todd Helton | 2000 | Rockies | 162 | 2.22 | 8.87 |
| David Ortiz | 2005 | Red Sox | 157 | 3.31 | 8.66 |
| Tony Gwynn | 1997 | Padres | 153 | 2.03 | 7.12 |
| Larry Walker | 2002 | Rockies | 150 | 2.09 | 5.93 |
| Bernie Williams | 2002 | Yankees | 146 | 2.08 | 5.43 |
| Eddie Murray | 1985 | Orioles | 145 | 2.89 | 6.36 |
| Tony Gwynn | 1984 | Padres | 144 | 3.13 | 7.39 |
| George Brett | 1976 | Royals | 144 | 2.76 | 5.14 |
| Vladimir Guerrero | 2007 | Angels | 143 | 2.55 | 6.12 |
| Ryan Howard | 2009 | Phillies | 139 | 2.77 | 6.29 |
| Ellis Burks | 2002 | Indians | 139 | 2.23 | 4.26 |
| Derek Jeter | 2006 | Yankees | 138 | 2.33 | 6.09 |
| Rusty Staub | 1976 | Tigers | 135 | 2.58 | 5.65 |
| Alan Trammell | 1988 | Tigers | 134 | 2.38 | 4.8 |
| Dwayne Murphy | 1981 | Athletics | 132 | 2.14 | 4.62 |
| Darren Daulton | 1993 | Phillies | 132 | 2.01 | 5.08 |
| Carlos Santana | 2013 | Indians | 132 | 2 | 4.2 |
| Mike Hargrove | 1979 | – – – | 131 | 2.18 | 4.21 |
| Miguel Tejada | 2002 | Athletics | 129 | 2.87 | 5.04 |
| Mark Grace | 1993 | Cubs | 129 | 2.58 | 5.54 |
| Rickey Henderson | 1988 | Yankees | 127 | 2.86 | 6.76 |
| Tony Gwynn | 1988 | Padres | 127 | 2.83 | 5.16 |
| Josh Hamilton | 2011 | Rangers | 127 | 2.2 | 4.95 |
| Eric Hosmer | 2015 | Royals | 124 | 2.33 | 3.87 |
| Bruce Bochte | 1980 | Mariners | 123 | 2.43 | 4.14 |
| Jason Giambi | 1997 | Athletics | 123 | 2.37 | 2.63 |
| Bryce Harper | 2019 | Phillies | 122 | 2 | 5.07 |
| Mark Grace | 1999 | Cubs | 121 | 2.18 | 4.81 |
| Mark Loretta | 2003 | Padres | 121 | 2.11 | 3.8 |
| Ray Knight | 1986 | Mets | 120 | 2.5 | 4.23 |
| Alex Gordon | 2014 | Royals | 120 | 2.18 | 2.85 |
At the moment, Harper’s 5.07 WPA is the 231st-highest total since 1974. For comparison’s sake, the 231st-ranked wRC+ during that same time was 157 of Edgar Martinez in 2001. That’s the kind of production the Phillies have received from Harper in terms of results even though Harper hasn’t actually played that well. If Harper were to continue his torrid WPA pace and end up with 6.76 WPA on the season, that would be the 46th-highest mark of the last 46 seasons. The 46th-highest wRC+ during that time belongs to Mike Trout’s 2013 season, when he put up a 176 wRC+.
By results, the Phillies have received an MVP-level performance from Harper right there with Christian Yelich and Cody Bellinger. He hasn’t actually been that good because of all the outs, and his performances in important situations can’t be projected into the future, but in terms of the Phillies’ season, last night showed why some hits matter more than others. If the Phillies do make the playoffs, Bryce Harper’s combination of immense talent plus some good fortune in big moments will be a big reason why they play in October.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
more importantly, where does his time around the bases rank for HR trot this year? I’ve never seen someone loss a helmet round first on a HR over the wall, wish he would have let it fall.
Those Phillies unis are lovely. They should rock those full-time again.
And has pushed himself into sixth overall by cWPA this season.
He’s got a .209 BABIP with the bases empty and a .435 BABIP with men on. A large part of that is undoubtedly shift related, some is probably a selection effect (worse pitchers are more likely to have men on base) and the rest is probably just luck.
I was thinking that, since higher leverage spots are more likely to have men on base this could explain some of the clutch score, but last season he had similar (but less extreme) BABIP splits with men on but much better numbers in low leverage spots.
Still, it seems like to really get the most out of him you’d want to maximize the number of at bats he has with men on base. This why I would abandon the occasional Harper leading off experiment DC and Philly have both tried with him.
There was a baseball prospectus article back when shifting was mostly limited to slow lefty sluggers showing that such hitters were systematically more “clutch”.
“By results, the Phillies have received an MVP-level performance from Harper right there with Christian Yelich and Cody Bellinger. ”
Yikes. You cannot seriously be equating WPA with value. Sure, the context-free nature of WAR makes it problematic as an answer to the “How many fewer wins would the team have with a replacement/average player” counterfactual, but the lack of any retrospective context in WPA makes it a terrible solution as well.
Hey man!
How dare you suggest that a run in the first counts just as much as a run in the ninth, making any attempt to use WPA as an indicator of value utterly asinine!
“BY RESULTS” emphasis mine.
“By results,” a run in the first counts just as much as a run in the ninth.
Meaning WPA is an asinine way to measure how much a player impacts results, especially when REW is available.
Not sure it’s indicative of anything, but interesting that none of the 2019 Clutch leaders play for playoff-bound teams (PHI and StL might get in, ofc, but still)
FanGraphs really needs interactive charts/plots. I need to know who the guy with the 170 wRC+ and -3.5 clutch score was.
That is ’17 Aaron judge.
Low leverage: .295/.441/.665 wrc+ 190
Med leverage: .277/.411/.601 wrc+ 162
High leverage: .250/.356/.521 wrc+ 107
If that chart doesn’t scream Barry Bonds, Hall of Famer, I don’t know what does. Is that really all players on that chart?
I was very interested in the article until I saw that chart – then all I could think about was Bonds getting into the HOF. And more interestingly, if Bonds is that far beyond everyone, and Trout is the best player of every age-season in history, where does he fall on that chart?
Can we get an article just tracking Trout vs Bonds and a few other greats on not just WAR (which has been done many times) but WPA, etc…?l per age-season? Perhaps with scatter plots like that show to show how pedestrian everyone else is? Or at least an aggregate line of average HOF players, and an average of all MLB players?
Classic Cubs troll piece by former Cardinals blog editor and resident Cardinals homer.
I only partially joke — great piece Craig, as always. WPA analysis is always interesting but almost never satisfying as it leaves our convictions of legitimate clutchiness forever unfounded. Outliers aside, its lack of repeatable success has always confounded me.
Harper also has the highest gap in the league between his RE24 and his wRAA.
(Hosmer is second, LeMahieu a distant third)