Dana Brown Is Out in Houston as the Astros Sputter

Sunday afternoon, the Astros gave up seven unanswered runs to lose to the A’s 7-6. That loss, against the team with the worst record in the American League, dropped Houston below .500 for the first time this month, and into a tie with the Texas Rangers for the AL West division lead. That was the last game of a 3-9 homestand. The capper to this bummer of a fortnight in Houston followed promptly; the team and GM Dana Brown mutually agreed to part ways Sunday evening, which is team-and-manager speak for firing him.
Boy, am I bummed that I’ve already made an Apollo 13 reference about the Astros this year. Two in the same season would just be too many. So allow me to use some Shakespeare instead: Something is rotten in the state of Texas. While a 12-game stretch of poor play is a strange reason to change GMs, this move wasn’t about a couple of poor weeks of play. Instead, it’s about the last couple of years of poor play; the once-dominant Astros missed the playoffs in 2025, and this year they’re on track for their worst record since 2014 (excluding the pandemic-shortened 2020 season, when they went 29-31 but still made the playoffs). The farm system is one of the worst in baseball – 29th in our farm system rankings. The big league team has been outscored by 44 runs this year, and BaseRuns suggests Houston has played even a bit worse than that. Things really have deteriorated in Space City.
What’s meaningfully less clear is how much of that blame should be apportioned to Brown. He joined the Astros immediately after their 2022 World Series victory, replacing the departing James Click. Not many incoming GMs inherit a roster that just won the whole ball of yarn, but that cuts both ways. Brown inherited a great roster as well as the kind of dysfunction that leads a team and its GM to split up while simultaneously reaching the peak of the sport.
The first offseason of Brown’s tenure was basically a wash, with one blemish. He joined a World Series winner without a ton of expiring contracts – Justin Verlander was the only key contributor to depart – and inherited one signing, that of José Abreu, from owner Jim Crane’s brief time running baseball ops after Click departed. Abreu was coming off a solid season in Chicago, but he fell off a cliff upon reaching Houston; he was two wins below replacement level over one-plus year in town before the team released him.
That failed signing, though Brown wasn’t around when it was made, was the prelude to a poor record in free agency. The best signing of Brown’s tenure was Josh Hader, who signed a record-setting deal for a closer before the 2024 season and has been quite good when healthy since then. That’s been the only big hit, though, and there are plenty of misses to set against it. Abreu was a lemon. Christian Walker, the team’s big addition before the 2025 season, has been just OK. Tatsuya Imai came over from NPB this winter with plenty of hype, but he washed out of the Houston rotation in short order. (To be fair, he’s looked good out of the bullpen.)
That’s not great, but the bigger problem has been the other side of the ledger. The Astros were awash in stars when Brown arrived, but age and free agency have thinned the ranks considerably. They agreed to only two extensions in his tenure – five years and $64 million for Cristian Javier, who hasn’t eclipsed 50 innings pitched in a season since 2023, and five years and $125 million for team legend Jose Altuve, a deal that I feel comfortable in saying was as much about what Altuve had already meant to the team as it was how much he might contribute in the future.
In the meantime, the team’s core has whittled away by attrition. Alex Bregman left for Boston. Brown traded Kyle Tucker to the Cubs. Framber Valdez is a Tiger now. Jeremy Peña and Hunter Brown looked like prime extension candidates a few years ago, but both are rapidly headed for free agency without a deal in place. Yordan Alvarez continues to be one of the best hitters in baseball, but the roster around him simply doesn’t look as good as the Houston teams of a half-decade ago.
Attributing all of this to Brown misses important context, though. There’s nothing unusual about Houston mostly sitting out the free agency market; Michael Brantley, Josh Reddick, and Charlie Morton were the only big signings of the prime Astros era, and Reddick was the only one of that group to get a guaranteed contract of $50 million or more. Though the Astros have frequently run large payrolls, the well-paid stars on those teams were generally either homegrown guys with extensions or trade acquisitions.
The two players Brown extended have been disappointments on the field, no doubt. But which of the former Astros do you wish he’d signed? He did very well in trading one year of Tucker for multiple years of Cam Smith, Hayden Wesneski, and Isaac Paredes. The deal Bregman signed in Boston, and the subsequent one he signed in Chicago, were both larger than any free agency signing in team history; it’s unclear whether Crane would’ve signed off on either contract if Brown had wanted to make Bregman the same offer. Valdez has been mediocre since leaving.
The biggest problem with the Astros in the Brown era wasn’t their inability to sign someone good in free agency or to extend their best players, though both factors have contributed to their recent struggles. Rather, it was the lack of new impact performers from the minor leagues. Houston has gotten just one season of two-plus WAR from a rookie in the last four years — Yainer Diaz in 2023. Diaz and Hunter Brown were the team’s top two prospects when Dana Brown arrived, both top 100 prospects. Six other Houston minor leaguers hit our Top 100 list during Brown’s tenure. Korey Lee, Drew Gilbert, Jacob Melton, and Jake Bloss were all traded away. Kevin Alvarez hit our 2026 Top 100 midseason update, but he’s a ways off; he’s 18 and playing in his first year of full-season ball. The last of the six is Smith, who was a Cubs prospect and has never played a minor league game for the Astros. In other words, the farm system is just completely bare.
That’s not a new thing. The Astros had a bottom-10 farm system when they hired Brown, and then they promptly graduated their two top prospects and traded the next two best. They draft late. They buy at every deadline. They lost multiple draft picks as a penalty for the banging scheme. The last first-round pick to make a big impact for the team? That’d be Bregman and Tucker, both drafted in the first round in 2015. The fruits of the Jeff Luhnow era were huge – but Houston’s been trending downwards on the drafting and development standpoint ever since.
Truthfully, this looks like a very difficult situation to step into. Jeff Bagwell famously has Crane’s ear, and appears to be heavily involved in baseball operations decisions. Crane himself is no stranger to meddling, and in fact has named himself the interim head of baseball operations with Brown out. It’s never easy to understand organizational dynamics from the outside, but again, the Astros fired their GM directly after winning a World Series. It’s safe to say that things are at least a little dysfunctional there.
The Astros find themselves at a competitive crossroads, too. Their current roster is thin; all those years of missed draft picks and deadline trades have caught up to them. Many of their best players are due to reach free agency after the 2027 or 2028 seasons. Smith is the only regular contributor younger than 27. (Mike Burrows might have a case here, but “regular” and “contributor” are still open for debate there.) A lot of organizations might look at this roster and start planning for the distant future.
To Houston’s credit, it hasn’t operated like that since Luhnow’s initial tanking spree set the franchise on this course more than a decade ago. The Astros consistently look to compete, and they made the playoffs in eight straight years before last year’s miss. But if I were a GM stepping into this job today, I’d be trying to figure out how long I could keep all the balls in the air before everything falls.
The Astros have a top-10 payroll this year, the largest in franchise history. They have the ninth-highest committed payroll in the majors for 2027. They don’t take big swings in free agency. They don’t have reinforcements in the wings; we give ETAs to prospects, and only two of their top 10 are expected to reach the majors before 2028. The odds are good that if this Houston team makes the playoffs in 2027, it’ll be doing so with its current major leaguers, plus some bit-part roles from prospects and waiver claims.
For me, that means 2027 is a good time to keep trying to win, under the argument of “if not now, when?” Surely, the plan of running high-but-not-overwhelming payrolls and trying to avoid free agency can’t keep going now that almost the entirety of the original World Series core has departed or aged out. The moment of reckoning is coming at some point. I’m not saying that a long trip to the cellar is inevitable, but there just isn’t much to work with on the farm at the moment. A few years of higher draft picks and fewer deadline deals would do wonders.
On the other hand, good luck pitching that to Crane. Like I said, the Astros haven’t operated like that in a while. Crane has some Jerry Jones in him, too; he wants to win so badly, and thinks of himself so highly, that he can’t help putting his thumb on the scales for major decisions. Heck, he reportedly instructed Brown not to sell at this deadline. I think there’s a decent chance that Bagwell ends up with this job, in fact; there’s been no formal reporting on whether he wants the responsibility, but given his position as Crane’s most trusted baseball advisor, he seems like a natural pick.
Whoever Houston chooses as its next GM will be stepping into an exceedingly tricky situation. They’ll have to get Crane and Bagwell behind their plan for the team. They’ll have to do so with a lockout looming, and then effect whatever changes they’ve planned in an abbreviated offseason. If things go wrong, they’ll be operating with very little margin for error, because there aren’t enough prospects knocking on the door to fill in any gaps. I think that a lot of people who look at baseball through a mathematical, probabilistic lens would blow the team up this offseason if they were in charge. I don’t think that’s an option here, though. Based on how they’ve acted for the past several years, and based on the continuity in baseball thinking between Crane and Bagwell, I think it’s a near certainty that the next GM is coming in with a mandate to win now.
Luckily for Houston fans, that won’t come into play until the winter. In the short run, the plan is simpler, because the front office doesn’t have many levers to pull in late August. Either the current team will be good enough, or it won’t be, and it doesn’t much matter whether Dana Brown, Jeff Bagwell, or some yet-to-be-determined option is sitting in the team suite watching the games. It might feel weird to fire your GM in the middle of August, after they’ve already lasted through the draft and the trade deadline, but the upside is that the Astros will have plenty of time to get their ducks in a row when it comes to future plans before the interview process begins in earnest this offseason. As wild as this news sounds, I don’t expect it to have any impact on the 2026 team’s fortunes.
Still, this whole situation is a mess, and at some point, the mess becomes the message. The Astros have been phenomenally successful in the 2020s, but they’ve done so with a backdrop of extreme volatility in the front office, and it looks to me as though that’s affected their drafting and development. There’s more upheaval to come, surely; manager Joe Espada’s contract is up after this year, and the next GM will likely want to bring in either their own skipper or Crane’s hand-picked guy. The future is unknown and unknowable – but it’s hard for me to imagine a smooth transition to a new leadership group given how bumpy the road has been in Houston of late. The end of the current Astros era looms, and this most recent drama is just a symptom.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
This is pretty shameful, after he won the 1991 Dunk Contest and all
Dammit, that was Dee Brown
It will be very telling who the first initial candidates are in this search for what Crane has in mind and whether he has learned anything from the last few years. I disagree on Bagwell and don’t think he wants the job – he currently has a pretty great setup, with the responsibility to make high level front office decisions without any of the accountability when it goes wrong or qualifications to be making them in the first place.
The optimist in me wants to think Crane looks at the last few years and realizes they leaned too heavily away from analytics. Last time they looked for a GM it was a lot of old school scout types (like Dana) and Ausmus (another name to watch for either GM or manager). If those are the first initial names, I will be pretty negative about the overall trajectory of where this is headed. Not because those types can’t be good GMs in the right situation in the current age of baseball, but I think it will signal that Crane (and Bagwell) still have a very specific vision in mind for how things should be run
Ultimately things are likely to get worse no matter what here pretty soon, that’s just where they are at on the winning curve. Even if they drafted well the last several years it was going to be hard to stay competitive when you aren’t spending massive amounts of money to sign/keep players and you are trading prospects every July. And they haven’t drafted well, at all. But I would like to see a shift from ownership in how the front office is structured to a more traditional set up, and maybe the inevitable rebuild will be shorter and less painful.
Weren’t there reports of ownership meddling in minor trades? Bryan Abreu for Trevor Larnach got veto’d because ownership didn’t want to touch the major league roster, tho that doesn’t explain the Varsho for Arrighetti trade.
Ownership meddled in a lot of things, enough that I have lost count of most of it. I think most of it was directives to do something rather than vetoing something that the front office had put together.
I want to say their future looks bad but they’re in a division with Sacramento and Anaheim.
The Las Vegas A’s will probably be a lot better than this year’s version, though of course the Angels are never not irrelevant.
The regimes in Arlington and Seattle trip themselves up pretty often too.
I had a running joke that the moment Dana Brown announced they weren’t going to do something that it was 100% going to happen.
I have lost count of the number of times he said that they were going to rely on internal reinforcements, only to suddenly pivot and trade for / sign someone. The Hader deal is the one that I remember most vividly, mostly because I predicted that it would happen based on him getting overruled previously.
And you can see Crane’s fingerprints all over the first base situation and the bullpen, with the moves being awfully similar to the things he was doing when it was just him and Bagwell doing stuff.
I don’t know if Minasian or Brown are good enough to run a team. Certainly they made more than their fair share of missteps. But they both had really tough jobs, trying to fill up the roster with whatever small budget was leftover from the contracts the owner directed him to complete. These are badly run franchises.
Minasian and Brown were both fired immediately after losses to the A’s.
Which says something about something.
The A’s could partner with Indeed and lean into the bit
Someone will take this job at some point because nature abhors a vacuum, but the guys who he has fired / lowballed / sidelined are pretty well connected and word travels. Click, Brown, and Putila collectively know a lot of the people that the Astros might want to hire to take over. I can’t imagine they’re going to give the organization a glowing review.
The Angels had the right idea by hiring Mozeliak first, since he is well respected and has connections and can explain how things are different (although I am not sure they will be long-term). It sure doesn’t seem like this is the way the Astros are going to go.
Am I the only one amused that Crane named himself the HOBO (head of baseball operations?
“Well, I woke up this mornin’, it was drizzlin’ rain, around the curve come an owner named Crane, heard somebody yodel & a HOBO moan, Astros they’re dead, been a long time gone, a long time gone”
Crane’s meddling kind of makes this feel like a paper move more than anything else. Dana Brown had been cut off at the knees for a while.
Timing is strange because if you were thinking of doing this, letting him run your draft and deadline doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Although i guess maybe he wasn’t really running it at all, given the earlier point.
Also doesn’t seem like the type of move that is going to fire up the team to make the playoffs like firing a manager would.
Just seems like a bad spot in Houston. Whole thing feels very monkey’s paw – would you trade two World Series titles if it meant your team became hated for a cheating scandal and you became saddled with a meddling owner who got in the way of any future success?
Cheating and being hated for it are two different things.
Steroid users were often shunned post career but their team WS titles not tainted. 1999, 2000, 2009 Yankees, 2004, 2007 Red Sox titles have no taint.
In this case Carlos Beltrán, Alex Bergman, AJ Hinch and Alex Cora seem to have had no long term taint but the team is reviled by some.
If you are going to meddle as an owner, you need to be willing to spend over and through your mistakes. The backlash against analytical GMs by a couple of owners has not gone well. I’m not saying that style of GM shouldn’t ever be fired, but the answer is better analytics, more tools for player dev, better communication, etc. It’s not to try to recapture an earlier era of team management.
Thanks for another fun read…
Blow the team up to what end? Starting off your tenure by selling off everything and having multiple terrible seasons is a pretty tough direction to take. Alienate fans, provide ownership with easy pretext to fire you at any point in the future, while also have no guarantee that your “window of contention” lasts any longer than the period of tanking that you initiated.
As a fan I just really dislike the idea of punting future seasons in the name of some theoretical maximization of WS probability. What am I supposed to do with my summers during the time when I’d usually be watching baseball?
There are a few different issues here. The root of all of them is that they have had no direction now other than the whims of ownership since Click left. They sign players to ill-advised deals but have forbidden the front office to go over the tax line or rebuild. They need to figure out whether they’re going to go for it in 2027 or kick off a rebuild, but they have no organizational capacity to go for it and no stomach to rebuild.
Then there’s the question of which path they should take. I think there’s a reasonable argument to keep the band together and go for it. There are advantages to both paths. Alvarez, Paredes, Pena, and Hunter Brown is a pretty good core. The rest of the roster is bad or constantly injured so it’s not perfect or anything. They need two outfielders to replace Varsho and Wade, a playoff-caliber starter to pair with Hunter Brown, a competent catcher, and a better utiilty guy to cover for when Correa is hurt. Probably looking at about $70M in AAV for the next 3 or 4 years to do all of that. That’s doable but it probably pushes them over $300M in salary for 2027.
The flip side is trading their best players now to accelerate the rebuilding process. The hope is that by trading Alvarez, Paredes, Pena, and Brown now you’re bringing in a ton of prospects that can form the next wave of the next good Astros team in 2029 or so. The rationale for this is that this team is probably going to fall apart in 2028 anyway. They won’t be able to afford to keep Pena and Paredes, Altuve is declining, and Alvarez and Correa are major injury risks that are not likely to get better with time. And they have no obvious help coming until at least 2029 anyway. The hope is that by getting a start on it now you only have to spend a couple years in the wilderness and you can go back to competing again shortly.
Then there’s the question of whether a new front office person should do that or not. I think there’s a pretty good argument for not taking the job where you’re the guy shipping out star players, and I think there’s a reason why the assistant GM from the last regime is often left in place as interim to oversee the sell-off. But Crane is a terrible choice for that, both because he is objectively unqualified to do it and because he will still be with the team later.
Given that the Astros have been in the playoffs for 8 of the last 9 years, this non-Astors fan would be happy to see some other teams take their place. Now, if only the Dodgers would disappear for a few years.
He’s had infinitely more success than a certain GM in Baltimore but the latter will likely outlast him by half a decade
This guy has a .536 win loss record in Houston. Ben Cherington: .427 in Pittsburgh. Ben will be in Pittsburgh in March, though.
According to Eno Sarris that Imai deal was Crane’s doing too. You would think after Abreu blew up in his face, and it became obvious Correa wasnt necessary, hed have learned to stay out of personnel decisions.
Every player on their roster making $1 million in ‘26 – 17 in total – is not controlled after ‘28 except Altuve.!
Yet only 4 (Abreu, Okert, DeLosSantos, and Vasquez) are FAs after ‘26 and they total under $11 million in current payroll. The top end is set in stone through ‘27, while there are 4 arbs / options (Pena, Paredes, Brown, & Diaz) that will soak up a good portion or all + of that $11 million while 5 more arbs not yet making a mil will chime in from below (Wesneski, Sousa, Blanco, Trammell, and the surprising Peter Lambert)
So ‘27 is not the year to blow it up.
And it will blow itself up after ‘28 anyway
I guess they could try to move post 27 FAs Walker and Javier and some of their combined $41 million and let Paredes and depth guys replace them. Good luck with that!
And they could non tender Meyers & Allen to save $5 million and hope kids could fill the defensive holes. Better chance there maybe.
Still ugh! It’s a tough job but someone will have to do it.
The question is whether blowing it up a year early before it crashes in 2028 will shorten their tenure as a sub 70-win team. If they got out in front of it by trading their four valuable trade pieces (Pena, Paredes, and especially Alvarez and Brown) they could restock the middle levels of the farm system fast and be on the ascent again by 2029. But there’s no guarantee you would get anyone as good as Alvarez or Brown in that group you get back, so maybe you take the single year with all four of those guys before it self-destructs and leaves you with a 5 year rebuild.
If it will blow up anyway, might as well get some prospects that will be ready for ’29.
I’m shocked by the lack of trash can jokes in the comments
The funniest outcome (though I would oppose it) would be for them to back into the AL West championship with a sub-.500 record and then go on an inexplicable run and win the World Series.
No mention of Jeff Bagwell in the comments. I’d be curious to see how often the “former hometown star player whispering in the ear of owner” turns out. What percentage of former star players turn out to be good GMs/VPs/President of blah blah operations?
It has been bad so far
Dana Brown’s fate was sealed when Crane overruled him on the Larnach/Abreu trade, just like Click’s fate was sealed when Crane overruled him on the Willson Contreras/Jose Urquidy deal in 2022. Crane has always meddled (he famously insisted that Josh Rojas be included in the Zack Greinke deal, when it was about to fall apart because AZ insisted on Rojas and Luhnow didn’t want to part with him)-but it’s next level to overrule a trade that’s been agreed to. A GM has no credibility with his peers when his owner backtracks you on a deal you’ve made. So I suspect that Brown, like Click before him, would have insisted on final authority over baseball transactions and since Crane wasn’t going to give it to him, they might as well separate now as opposed to later.
It’s clear from Crane’s last few public appearances that he is looking for a competitive edge like the Astros had 5-10 years ago, but I don’t think he’s looking in the right place. Over the winter he directed Brown to recruit talent from Asia; I think he believed that the Astros could scout Asian leagues sooner than other people. I think the jury is still out on Imai; most Japanese players not destined for the HOF (like Ohtani or Ichiro) take a year or two to get their bearings. Look at Roki Sasaki now. Even Yamamoto was way better in years 2 and 3 than he was in year 1. The other players, from Korea, were not as good as Crane thought they would be. He needs to wear that, not Brown.
Now Crane wants to study how teams with lower payrolls have been successful, but he’s missing the point. The Astros’ 2022 WS (and 2017, to a lesser extent) were probably two of the most homegrown teams in recent history. 2022 was notable because they replaced departing stars with Yordan Alvarez and a new set of elite players (Pena over Correa, Tucker over Springer, Framber over Cole, and so on). Follow the 2022 blueprint – replace Bregman, Tucker and an aging Altuve with elite homegrown talent and you’ll be at the top again. Of course, you can’t do that when you trade away your first round picks every year.
I understand why Crane doesn’t value prospects – of all the players traded, only Joe Musgrove (for Cole) and Wilyer Abreu (for Vazquez in 2022) have actually panned out. But you can’t keep trading your best prospects every year, elevating your mid prospects to the point that they don’t have value (LA is very good at selling high on marginal but highly touted prospects, for example, because they never promote them), fail to develop the ones you keep, and expect your franchise to run like Milwaukee or Tampa.
The whole division is bad, why not go for it for another year? It’s not like they have to get past Yankees, Red Sox, and Rays to win the division. Even AL Central at least has White Sox trending up and I think Detroit has a good young core & farm system. They are in the easiest division to win.
No mention of the ill-fated Carlos Correa reunion, but that was the moment I figured this whole thing was sunk. It reeked of a bad owner chasing the old glory.