25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JaysCraze
8 years ago

As a Jays fan, I’m thrilled to read this but, considering all of the above, why are the projections so low on him (relatively, anyway) at 6 WAR? What regression are they all counting on?

CM52
8 years ago
Reply to  JaysCraze

The biggest cause of that “pessimism” is he’s being projected for 630 plate appearances on the depth charts. The Steamer projection extrapolated to the 700 he attained last year would hit 6.7 WAR, which is a reasonable decline.

If it makes you feel better, Zips projects 7 WAR over 657 PAs.

JaysCraze
8 years ago
Reply to  CM52

Hm, don’t know how I didn’t see those on the Projects page, but thanks! It DOES make me feel better 😛

Spartacus
8 years ago
Reply to  JaysCraze

Has his defense declined in real life? His defensive rating in Strat took a hit this year.

drew_willyMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Spartacus

There are so many 2016 cards (including Donaldson’s) that I am dying to see.

Carson
8 years ago
Reply to  JaysCraze

6 WAR projection is outstanding. Only two position players are projected better, one of which is named Trout. I’m a jays fan, too, and will be pretty happy if he meets his projection.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul Swydan

Yes,if you are not mike trout you probably need to hit some luck in things like BABIP,HR/FB and health on top of great ability to hit 7 plus war.

John Autin
8 years ago
Reply to  JaysCraze

Donaldson is 31 this year, and the vast majority of players are in decline by that age.

I took all the modern players who totaled at least 20 bWAR over ages 27-30:
— They averaged 6.2 bWAR per year in that span.
— At age 31, they averaged 5.0 bWAR, a 20% decline from that prior average.

Donaldson is projected to decline at a similar rate.