Let’s Take a Peek at Some Early 2025 Pitch Usage Trends

Denis Poroy-Imagn Images

Every winter, pitchers step off the mound and into the lab. Sure, not every pitcher is in a wind tunnel with a high speed camera from October to January, but enough are that everyone seems to reap the benefits. You’ve got the sweeper, the kick change, the rise of the splitter, new fastball shapes – you name it, someone has tried it recently. That means that every year, I spend the first month or two of the season catching up to the new hot thing going on in the world of pitching.

But I have to level with you: On the whole, things haven’t changed as much this year as I expected. That won’t stop me from walking through what has changed, though, and the first shift to highlight is a subtle one – we’re seeing more bendy sliders and fewer gyro offerings:

Slider Usage By Year
Year Sweeper Slider
2020 1.1% 16.8%
2021 1.9% 17.2%
2022 3.9% 16.9%
2023 5.6% 16.3%
2024 6.5% 15.5%
2025 7.6% 14.9%

Why? Two things are happening. First, sweeping sliders do better against same-handed batters, so pitchers are choosing that as their secondary of choice when they have the platoon advantage. In 2021, 2.6% of pitches that righties threw to righties were sweepers. In 2025, that number has ballooned to 10.7%; it’s 10.9% for lefties against lefties. Usage is less than half as high when opposite-handed batters are at the plate.

Meanwhile, “regular” sliders are on the decline when pitchers have the platoon advantage. That makes good sense – they’re just throwing sweepers instead. And when pitchers aren’t facing same-handed batters, neither slider is particularly great; pitchers are staying away from both, more or less. That means that the traditional, gyro-spin slider is declining in prevalence overall.

To be clear, plenty of pitchers still throw them. Faster, tighter sliders pair well with certain pitch types, and some guys are just better at throwing them. Not every arm is created equal, or the same. But as pitch design gets easier and easier – it seems like everyone throws six pitches now – why not feature a breaking ball specifically tailored for the situation you find yourself in instead of having only one type of offering?

Likewise, the share of offspeed pitches thrown to opposing hitters has never been higher. We have pitch tracking data back to 2008; last year was the first where offspeed pitches comprised more than 20% of right/left offerings. The five years from 2020-2024 all checked in between 18% and 19%; no previous year even hit 18%. We’ve known since time immemorial that offspeed pitches are excellent against hitters with the platoon advantage; only recently, however, have pitchers started leaning heavily in that direction.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

A further tailwind here comes from the aforementioned flourishing of pitch design. Read developmental reports from any of the last 60 years, and you’d see “needs to learn a changeup” in the notes for many would-be aces. It’s not just bad pitchers, either; Clayton Kershaw never could figure out how to throw one despite being one of the best hurlers of the 21st century. But now that the kick change is an option, or a splitter, or different grips based on your fastball grip… Well, you get the idea. Learning a changeup has never been easier because there have never been more ways to learn to throw a changeup, nor more technological tools to help you do the learning.

What have those changeups been replacing? Among other things, sinkers. This year marks the lowest rate of sinkers thrown to opposite-handed batters since we have data. This isn’t some tiny shift, either. A decade ago, righties threw lefties sinkers 21% of the time. We’re down to 9.7% this year. Four-seamers haven’t felt the same sting; pitchers are using them slightly less often, but they’ve comprised just over a third of the pitches that opposite-handed batters see for quite a while now.

In other words, there’s been a wholesale change in the way that pitchers attack opposite-handed batters. Take a look at the pitches that lefty hitters have faced against right-handed pitching over the years:

Right-on-Left Pitch Mix by Year
Year Four-Seam% Sinker% Cutter% Offspeed% Breaking%
2015 35.5% 21.0% 5.1% 16.6% 21.7%
2016 36.5% 19.5% 4.8% 15.5% 23.6%
2017 34.8% 20.7% 5.2% 15.7% 23.2%
2018 37.0% 18.2% 4.9% 16.5% 22.9%
2019 38.2% 13.9% 5.2% 17.5% 24.6%
2020 36.6% 13.2% 6.3% 18.9% 25.0%
2021 37.8% 12.1% 6.9% 18.2% 25.0%
2022 36.3% 11.1% 8.1% 18.4% 26.0%
2023 35.4% 10.2% 8.9% 18.7% 26.7%
2024 34.8% 10.1% 9.6% 18.9% 26.5%
2025 34.5% 9.7% 9.1% 20.8% 25.9%

That’s a bummer for lefties, because sinkers thrown by righties are the single best pitch to face. That’s how it goes when you start crunching data, though: Both sides now know which pitches work best, but only the pitchers get to choose what to throw.

Ah, so are sinkers on the decline everywhere? Nope. Here’s the same grid of pitch types by year, but for right-on-right matchups:

Right-On-Right Pitch Mix by Year
Year Four-Seam% Sinker% Cutter% Offspeed% Breaking%
2015 36.9% 19.3% 6.6% 7.1% 30.0%
2016 36.6% 18.6% 5.8% 7.4% 31.5%
2017 34.3% 20.6% 6.0% 6.8% 31.9%
2018 35.1% 19.2% 5.9% 6.5% 33.0%
2019 35.1% 17.2% 6.4% 7.1% 33.5%
2020 32.8% 17.5% 7.0% 7.6% 35.2%
2021 33.8% 17.4% 6.5% 7.1% 35.1%
2022 30.4% 18.4% 7.3% 6.9% 36.9%
2023 28.7% 19.6% 7.6% 7.5% 36.5%
2024 28.5% 19.7% 7.8% 7.1% 36.8%
2025 28.8% 19.5% 7.5% 8.0% 36.2%

Sinkers are just as cool now as they were a decade ago, at least as long as you’re throwing them with the handedness advantage. Four-seamers are on the decline, with breaking balls taking up much of the slack. It almost looks like two different populations of pitchers making these changes: The ones who face a lot of lefties have given up sinkers, while the ones who face a lot of righties have given up four-seamers.

That’s not quite what’s happening, though. Most pitchers, particularly starters, throw both a four-seamer and a sinker. While pitchers are learning new secondaries at a record clip, they’re also learning when to throw their fastballs. In other words, even with the same arsenal of four-seamer and sinker, pitchers are getting more out of their options by using them differently depending on who’s at the plate.

To measure this change in pitch usage, I came up with a metric I’m calling adaptation score. Let’s use Logan Webb as an example. Against righties, his favorite two pitches are a sinker and a sweeper. He throws those two a whopping 77.7% of the time. Hey, if it works, why do anything else? Against lefties, however, neither of those pitches plays up to its full potential, so Webb throws them less often, a combined 54.4% of the time. He fills in the gap with his excellent changeup and a new cutter. That makes Webb’s adaptation score 23.3 – the difference between how often he uses his top two pitches with the platoon advantage and without.

Compare Webb to Spencer Strider’s 2023 season, and you’ll start to understand how adaptation scores work. Strider threw his four-seamer or slider 99.2% of the time to righties that year; against lefties, he threw them 87.4% of the time. Sure, he adapted a little, but his 11.8 adaptation score is roughly half of Webb’s. Kershaw, the top pitcher of 2015, had an adaptation score of 2.9 that year. He just threw his four-seamer and slider regardless of who he faced. Good pitchers don’t all operate the same way, and this metric helps to measure that.

Armed with this measure of variation in approach, I set out to calculate how much the league’s adaptation score has changed. I took the adaptation score for every pitcher/season combination starting in 2015. Then I took a weighted average for each year, using pitches thrown as my weights. Pitchers are learning to adapt more and more. That’s true even if you think that adaptation score should care about the top three pitches instead of the top two:

Adaptation Score, 2015-present
Year Adaptation Score Three-Pitch Version
2015 12.4 9.6
2016 11 7.8
2017 11.8 9.1
2018 13.5 9.2
2019 11.8 8.7
2020 13.7 9.7
2021 14.8 9.6
2022 16.2 10.6
2023 15.1 10.9
2024 15.3 12.3
2025 16.5 13.6

If you’re interested in how to calculate this for the whole league, I can tell you in two words: very carefully. Or, fine, I can just show you. The code that turns pitch-level data into league-wide adaptation scores can be found here. Download what you’re looking for from Baseball Savant, make sure the columns are labeled correctly, and you too can easily calculate this statistic I invented today.

Okay, so pitchers are behaving more flexibly than they used to. More specifically, they’re backing off of whatever pitches they’ve honed for use against same-handed batters when they run into a bad matchup. You can think of this, broadly, as the decline of the sinker/slider arm. Sure, there are still sinker/slider relievers in the majors, but many of them behave a bit differently than they used to. They’ve added a changeup, or a cutter, or split their slider up into a sweeping version and a gyro version and mixed them depending on hitter handedness.

In other words, the big change in pitch usage is that pitchers are more willing to vary their pitch usage. I think this has a lot to do with the recent influx of training methods and technology, though I can’t prove it. Now that pitchers are learning new offerings more quickly and more effectively — and particularly now that they also have detailed data on how each of their pitches performs depending on who they’re facing — this increase in adaptation seems like the path of least resistance.

2025 pitch data is current through games of April 29.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
dangledangleMember since 2024
1 year ago

What would the impact be if they adapted lot the same extent that they did in 2015 compared to now? Also what is it going back further if possible. It would be interesting to see the r2 value for such a projection. The type of pitches also have an obvious impact that would make it difficult. Maybe make a hypothetical where the pitch use remained constant and the adaptation remained constant. Hmm

SportszillaMember since 2017
1 year ago

Fascinating! Is this having any tangible effect on platoon splits?

Ryan DCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Sportszilla

Great question

OgbertMember since 2025
1 year ago

Can I just say — this week’s output of articles on Fangraphs has been especially wonderful/insightful/delightful. Just a note of appreciation for Ben and the whole crew!

eczernieMember since 2023
1 year ago

One thing I’ve always struggled to wrap my head around is why the sinker is bad for opposite handed matchups but the changeup is good. I’ve read that sinkers don’t work well because they run right into the barrel, but wouldn’t the same be true of changeups? Does the lower velo cause the changeup to drop under the barrel instead of going right to it?

shinythingsMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  eczernie

Instead of thinking about just the movement in isolation, think about a combo of movement/bat path/timing. If the most common approach is to time the fastball, then adjust, the opposite-handed hitter will be on time for the sinker and maybe hit it off the end of the bat. While if their adjustment to off-speed is anything less than perfect they’ll be out in front, the bat will have traveled along the path to cover more of the inner part of the plate while the ball is moving away, and they’ll whiff.

Same idea for the sweeper and platoon splits. If the hitter is a little out in front timing-wise, the bat will be out in front of the body covering inside/the inner part of the plate. This works well if it’s breaking toward you, but less so if it’s breaking away from you out of the zone.

Last edited 1 year ago by shinythings
eczernieMember since 2023
1 year ago
Reply to  shinythings

That makes a lot of sense, thanks!

Slacker GeorgeMember since 2016
1 year ago

Great stuff.

NatsNationMember since 2020
1 year ago

If I wasn’t spending my golden years pottering about the world, I’d use Ben’s instructions to look at this on a team-by-team basis. I rather imagine that teams like my Nats, the Rockies, the White Sox, and other less data driven teams ams lag the trend and that the Dodgers, Guards, Mets (now), and Rays lead the trend.

AzizalMember since 2017
1 year ago

Lance Brozdowski predicted this would be the year of deep arsenals. He nailed it.

KyleMember since 2024
1 year ago

Reminds me of the “Danks theory”. Lefty John Danks had a great changeup: natural pronation. This was very effective against righties, but he didn’t have a great out pitch to left handed batters. He never threw a changeup to a lefty, it just didn’t work. Teams didn’t really notice and trotted out righty-heavy lineups, until the Rays (Maddon) started a lefty-heavy lineup and exposed him. I wonder now what the pitching labs would have done with him.