Meet the New Kyle Hendricks, Similar to the Old Kyle Hendricks

The Cubs are in playoff contention at the end of August, and Kyle Hendricks is getting hitters out with a tasting menu of exquisitely located mid-80s funk. (Grabs nearest passerby) “The date! I need you to tell me the date!…God Almighty, my time machine works!”
For most of the late 2010s, Hendricks was not quite an ace but was a bankable no. 2 or no. 3 starter. Even in his relative youth, he never threw hard; the fastest pitch of Hendricks’ entire career was 93.1 mph, and he hasn’t even hit 91 since 2016. People who apparently never watched Greg Maddux loved to stamp a “next Greg Maddux” label on any bookish right-hander with great command, and of those, Hendricks probably came the closest to living up to the comparison.
After a dominant COVID-shortened 2020, Hendricks struggled; he got blasted to the tune of a 4.77 ERA and 4.89 FIP in 2021, then put up similar numbers in 2022 before a shoulder injury put him down for the season.
But since returning from that injury around Memorial Day, Hendricks has been very good: a 3.80 ERA and 3.97 FIP in 104 1/3 innings over 18 starts. That performance isn’t going to make Hendricks a Cy Young contender, as he was in 2016, but it’s the best he’s pitched since before the pandemic.
And the timing for the Cubs has been quite good; top free agent signing Jameson Taillon has been underwhelming, and putative no. 1 starter Marcus Stroman is on the IL with fractured cartilage in his rib cage. We in baseball become inured to torn ligaments and inflamed capsules, but “fractured rib cage cartilage” is a really gross-sounding injury. Like something out of Predator.
Until and unless Stroman returns, the top two pitchers in Chicago’s rotation are All-Star left-hander Justin Steele and Hendricks. So is this actually the same Hendricks who was entrusted to start Game 7 of the 2016 World Series? Sort of.
Of the 99 pitchers who have thrown at least 100 innings this year, 93 throw a four-seam fastball. Of those, Hendricks’ is the slowest, averaging 87.7 mph. Rich Hill has him by half a mile an hour. Sixty-six of those pitchers throw a sinker; Hendricks’ is the second-slowest of those at 87.4 mph, ahead of only Hill. He has the fifth-lowest strikeout rate of pitchers with at least 100 innings this season.
So the stuff isn’t very good in and of itself. In addition to rock-bottom velocity, Hendricks’ two fastballs and changeup generally have below-average movement:
| Pitch | Velo | In. of Drop | vs. Avg | In. of Break | vs. Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fastball | 87.7 | 21.0 | -1.6 | 4.9 | -0.8 |
| Sinker | 87.4 | 29.0 | 1.3 | 12.1 | -1.7 |
| Changeup | 80.5 | 33.8 | -0.8 | 10.3 | -2.3 |
There also isn’t a huge velocity differential between Hendricks’ fastballs and his most-used secondary pitch, the changeup. The velocity delta between Hendricks’ hardest fastball and his changeup is 7.1 mph, which is middle-of-the-road. Of that sample of pitchers with 100 or more innings, 83 throw a changeup. Of those, Hendricks’ fastball-changeup velocity differential is 48th.
Perversely, these three pitches, which make up about 96% of Hendricks’ total output this season, are so closely grouped together in movement and velocity that they entice opponents to swing but make Hendricks difficult to square up. Opponents are still crushing Hendricks’ fastball (.480 wOBA), but the .213 opponent wOBA he’s getting on his changeup is the lowest of his career.
Hendricks’ overall opponent wOBA is 25th-best out of the 106 pitchers who qualify for Baseball Savant’s leaderboard. He doesn’t strike anyone out, but he also doesn’t walk anyone. Hendricks would no doubt like to run a whiff rate like Spencer Strider’s, but he’s able to live with the lack of strikeouts. Being able to locate as well as Hendricks does helps, sure, but he’s also inducing weak contact. His opponent wOBACON is ninth-best in baseball, and his xwOBACON is 11th.
The way he’s doing this is by throwing the ball in places where the hitter can reach the ball, but can’t hit the ball hard. Hendricks has thrown 26.6% of his pitches in the chase attack zone, the highest rate out of 117 pitchers with at least 1,500 pitches thrown this season. That’s the area just outside the strike zone. And even though the ball is out of the zone, opponents have swung at 30.7% of the pitches Hendricks has thrown in that region this year, the fifth-highest mark in baseball.
As a result, Hendricks is prospering in this area just beyond the frontiers of the strike zone. Overall, Hendricks has held opponents to a .217 wOBA in the chase zone, 13th-best in the league. When hitters swing, that number goes down to .111.
That’s one of the big changes for Hendricks this season; when he was getting romped in 2021, he was leaving the ball in the strike zone too much. Now, he’s throwing it down and out of the zone more, and hitters are chasing.
The other change is that Hendricks has all but junked his curveball. He’s still throwing it 3.8% of the time, but that’s just 61 pitches all year. That’s basically nothing. Go home and tell your partner or your roommate or your parents that you did 3.8% of the dishes and see how they react.
The curveball has always been one of Hendricks’ weaker pitches, and he’s never thrown it more than 20% of the time. But back in 2016, he was working with a curve and a cutter pretty frequently. Now, he’s only throwing pitches with arm-side movement.
Just 4.5% of the pitches Hendricks has thrown this season have had neutral or glove-side movement. Among the 117 pitchers with at least 1,500 pitches thrown this season, that’s the second-lowest percentage. Here’s a fun bit of trivia: The pitchers at both extremes of this list are both Cubs. Steele throws more pitches with glove-side movement than any other pitcher in the league; Drew Smyly has the most arm-side-heavy repertoire.
As you know, most starting pitchers try to have both arm- and glove-side break in their repertoire because it allows them to combat both left- and right-handed hitters with pitches that break in on their hands. Hendricks has a pitch that breaks in on righties, but he only throws it three times a start. In fact, Hendricks has thrown three curveballs to lefties this year for every one he’s thrown to righties. It’s a virtual nonentity. And given how it’s been hit in recent years, ditching it seems like a smart move:
| Year | Usage% | BA | XBA | SLG | XSLG | WOBA | XWOBA | Whiff% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3.8 | 0.333 | 0.393 | 0.333 | 0.473 | 0.294 | 0.373 | 42.9 |
| 2022 | 11.9 | 0.421 | 0.29 | 0.789 | 0.504 | 0.517 | 0.337 | 33.3 |
| 2021 | 11.7 | 0.221 | 0.31 | 0.455 | 0.508 | 0.298 | 0.364 | 21.3 |
| 2020 | 16.7 | 0.147 | 0.174 | 0.147 | 0.231 | 0.146 | 0.193 | 30.3 |
| 2019 | 9.8 | 0.217 | 0.213 | 0.239 | 0.275 | 0.218 | 0.229 | 28.6 |
| 2018 | 7.6 | 0.483 | 0.28 | 0.759 | 0.374 | 0.529 | 0.285 | 24.6 |
| 2017 | 7.9 | 0.438 | 0.383 | 0.688 | 0.616 | 0.488 | 0.435 | 21.6 |
| 2016 | 7.8 | 0.25 | 0.214 | 0.357 | 0.366 | 0.276 | 0.263 | 15.8 |
| 2015 | 7.3 | 0.182 | 0.226 | 0.318 | 0.376 | 0.224 | 0.272 | 16.3 |
And he doesn’t seem to miss his breaking ball at all:
| AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | K% | BB% | HR/9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. LHB | .239 | .279 | .361 | .278 | 15.9 | 5.5 | 0.67 |
| vs. RHB | .257 | .291 | .411 | .302 | 15.5 | 2.8 | 1.24 |
It’s a noticeable reverse platoon split, but not a severe one. And with the shoulder injury behind him, Hendricks is having his best season in three years. It’s not quite a return to 2016 — for him or the Cubs as a team — but it’s progress.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
That line about doing 3.8% of the dishes is hilarious (and extremely true)
I do AT LEAST 5% of the dishes and it is greatly appreciated.
GREATLY! APPRECIATED!
Hey,I do 100% of the dishes at my house. And Mary thinks that is just fine. Of course, I never had a curveball.
Kyle Hendricks, what a magician.
.. wait a minute hang on: Drew Smyly has the most arm-side biased repertoire in baseball? Drew Smyly throws a curveball like 40% of the time. Drew Smyly’s curveball moves to the arm side?!
Yeah, I think this one got flipped too — don’t both his sinker and his change break in on righties?
it goes straight down or fades yeah. it’s not really much of a curve in the traditional sense
Yes Smyly has a “unicorn” curve ball that not only moves past vertical (arm side), but also has a very low spin rate for a curve.
Thought Hendricks extension might be one of the rare lose-lose deals for both the player and the club (free agent Hendricks would have commanded far north of $100M after his 2020) but looks like it could still be worth it for the Cubs in the end.
One notable aspect of his season that was not mentioned in the article is that junking the curveball happened with an increased reliance on changeup.
Starting pitchers by changeup% (2014-2023, 100+IP)
2016 Matt Shoemaker 40.8%
2023 Logan Webb 39.9%
2014 Alex Cobb 38.4%
2019 Trevor Richards 38.2%
2023 Kyle Hendricks 38.2%
No one would have given Hendricks close to $100 million, even after that great 2020. He signed the extension prior to the 2019 season, but even if he had hit free agency after 2020, his 2018-2020 stats were similar to Keuchel’s 2017-2019, the three years before he hit free agency. Keuchel only got $55 million. Hendricks was a year younger, so maybe he pushed $65/70, but he also throws even softer than Keuchel, so teams might have been wary.
From 2017 to 2019, Keuchel was 53rd in fwar, 30th in ra9-war, 45th by WPA.
From 2018 to 2020, Hendricks was 15th in fwar, 13th in ra9-war, 11th by WPA.
That is not similar at all.
Yes, a significant part of it is that Keuchel (and Boras) misjudged the market and had to sit for half of 2019, but even his shortened 2019 ended with a decent 3.75 ERA disguising an uglier xERA 4.82 and FIP 4.72.
I get why you would call Hendricks a bankable 2 or 3 starter. The advanced stats are solid but unspectacular and his stuff isn’t overpowering in the way we’re accustomed to.
But he was 7th in ERA among starters who threw 1000 innings between 2014 and 2020. Cole, Arrieta, Verlander, Keuchel, MadBum, and Strasburg all directly behind him. By the actual results Hendricks consistently got for 7 seasons it is hard to argue he wasn’t an ace.
Kinda disagree. Not in terms of results, but what it “means” to be an ace. When the Ace is on the mound, the worry level drops in fans and teammates don’t have to work as hard. But Hendricks has always given up a lot of contact and even the slightest misstep could spell disaster. On teams like the 2016 Cubs, who had one of the best team defenses in the last century, you could call him an ace. But not on teams like the 2018 or 2019 Cubs.
He had the 5th lowest hard contact rate for a starter 2015-2020.
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&lg=all&qual=y&type=24&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&players=0&startdate=&enddate=&month=0&season1=2015&season=2020&sortcol=10&sortdir=asc&stats=sta
I never said hard contact. Specifically so. It doesn’t have to be hard contact. How many games have been won or lost based on stupid little dribblers? Or grounders finding a seam? Or lost fly balls? Or the ball going through Bill Buckner’s legs? If there’s a ball in play, it has the potential to go horribly wrong. And Kyle Hendricks has never averaged even close to a strikeout an inning.
I don’t think he’s not a great pitcher, because anyone with a brain can see that. But his results have only been ace-caliber for the one season, in 2016. He’s been a good #2 or elite #3. But I don’t see him as an ace. Staff ace, maybe. But not anywhere near what you actually think of when you hear “Ace”, as in “elite pitcher among the best in the league”. Because he isn’t one.
I get what you’re driving at – that he seems to be getting by with smoke and mirrors, and you think at some point someone will pull back the curtain to reveal the wizard isn’t actually a wizard.
But I do think you get to a point where you realise that he is actually a wizard – these are the results he’s earnt.
The new Kyle Hendricks is somehow older than the old Kyle Hendricks
It is so extremely great for baseball and for all of us as baseball fans that Kyle Hendricks has had a highly effective decadelong career.
Baseball is at its best when it embodies the ideal that there is no one body type, no one shape, no one skillset that leads to excellence. Only in baseball can Jose Altuve and Aaron Judge be similarly valuable contemporaries.
I hope Kyle Hendricks stays in the league as long as Rich Hill.
I love that the day this was written he had a 6 inning, 6 strikeout game. Baseball is weird.
It’s incredible that an in-depth look at Kyle Hendricks was written now, almost a decade into his career, without acknowledging that he throws two distinct changeups with distinct movement profiles and distinct usage rates depending on the handedness of the hitter.
One changeup has 13-14 inches of horizontal break and 35ish inches of drop and ends up as a slower version of his sinker; the other has 4-8 inches of break and 27-30 inches of drop and works as a slower version of his four seam.
Without including this really really well-known thing about Kyle Hendricks, old and new, the entire analysis breaks down; averaging together those two pitches makes as much sense as doing so with a two-seam and a four-seam.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/kyle-hendricks-has-two-changeups/