Retooling Shouldn’t Be a Dirty Word for the Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers came into the season with every intention of competing for another World Series championship. While the team had a fairly low-key winter, the ZiPS projection system thought it would be legitimately competitive in the AL West, though not necessarily one of baseball’s top teams. Instead, with less than half the season’s slate of games remaining, Texas sits uncomfortably below .500 with the playoff math looking increasingly daunting.
When the season began, my understanding was the Rangers expected to struggle at times during the first half, especially in the rotation, and they were OK with that as long as they didn’t fall too far behind the other AL West contenders, the Houston Astros and Seattle Mariners. The organization was comfortable letting Jordan Montgomery walk in free agency because it felt the team had enough punch in the lineup to remain in the division race long enough for at least some of its injured pitchers to get healthy and reinforce the roster, which would be as good as acquiring a starter in a deadline trade.
For about a month, this scenario seemed to be playing out. The Astros limped miserably out of the gate, and the Mariners didn’t do much better. The Rangers spent most of April leading the AL West, but they didn’t build enough of a cushion. That came back to bite them when Seattle caught fire and Houston turned its season around. Simultaneously, Texas went in the other direction. Since May 1, the Rangers offense has put up a 92 wRC+, and that’s with the benefit of Corey Seager mashing after his early slump (.286/.367/.563 in that span) and Wyatt Langford hitting way better since coming off the IL in late May (.285/.339/.464). With the 17th-ranked ERA and 24th-ranked FIP since the start of May, the pitching staff hasn’t exactly made up for the offensive shortfall.
As of Thursday morning, ZiPS has the Rangers with a 10% chance to make the playoffs, far short of their projected 56% odds coming into the season. The projections still see the AL West as a race, but mostly between the Astros and Mariners, with Texas assuming the role of the third-place underdog.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle Mariners | 85 | 77 | — | .525 | 54.7% | 10.1% | 64.8% | 3.5% |
| Houston Astros | 84 | 78 | 1 | .519 | 38.6% | 11.3% | 49.9% | 2.9% |
| Texas Rangers | 78 | 84 | 7 | .481 | 6.4% | 3.6% | 10.0% | 0.4% |
| Los Angeles Angels | 70 | 92 | 15 | .432 | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Oakland A’s | 61 | 101 | 24 | .377 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Of course, 10% isn’t zero, but the Rangers certainly have their work cut out for them. ZiPS currently assumes that, on average, the Rangers will be a .500 team the rest of the season. Let’s make a different assumption, that ZiPS is very wrong, and on average, they will be a .530 team from here on out. That still only boosts their playoff probability to 17.8%. Simply playing better is no longer enough, and there is unlikely to be any kind of reasonable deadline addition that would help them flip the script.
At the same time, Texas is still positioned well for a run in 2025, so there’s no need to blow the whole team up. Looking at just the main contributors under team control, ZiPS generally sees brighter days ahead next season.
| Player | Projected 2024 Final WAR | Projected 2025 WAR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adolis García | 1.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| Tyler Mahle | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Dane Dunning | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| Evan Carter | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Jonah Heim | 1.9 | 2.7 | 0.8 |
| Jacob deGrom | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Andrew Knizner | -0.9 | -0.2 | 0.7 |
| Wyatt Langford | 1.8 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| Leody Taveras | 1.9 | 2.5 | 0.6 |
| Brock Burke | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Josh Jung | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Marcus Semien | 3.9 | 4.3 | 0.4 |
| Jonathan Hernández | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Cody Bradford | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
| Josh Sborz | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Corey Seager | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0.0 |
| Nathaniel Lowe | 2.1 | 1.8 | -0.3 |
| Jon Gray | 2.8 | 2.2 | -0.6 |
| Josh Smith | 4.2 | 2.3 | -1.9 |
| Total | 28.0 | 34.8 | 6.8 |
ZiPS projects this group of players to win six or seven more games in 2025 than they’re projected to this season. (The win total for 2024 is a combination of the team’s season-to-date and rest-of season projections.) That’s an impressive number in most circumstances, but even more so for a rather old team; the offense is slightly older than league average and the pitching staff is the oldest in the majors. This group already has a good case for contention in 2025.
So if this year’s a longshot and 2025 looks better, what’s the winning argument for not retooling with a focus toward improving the roster for next season? That’s not rhetorical; I don’t have a good one (and feel free to make one in the comments that my cold-stricken brain couldn’t conjure). Again, the Rangers won the World Series last fall, and having that ring already earned ought to give the team some room to maneuver without angering the fanbase. Now, the Rangers won’t be able to snag prospects on the level of Jackson Holliday or James Wood for the players they’d be willing to trade, but in swaps for their players on expiring contracts — Max Scherzer, Nathan Eovaldi, David Robertson, Andrew Heaney, José Leclerc, Kirby Yates, and Michael Lorenzen — I would think they could at least get some talent that could help them in the future, even if you assume Scherzer sticks to his stated preference that he won’t waive his no-trade clause.
Dropping out of a race when you’re the defending champ is a tough thing to do psychologically. But the Rangers are in a bad place right now, and by throwing in the towel, they could improve their chances to contend for another title in 2025.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
“Scherzer sticks to his stated preference that he won’t waive his no-trade clause.” That only means he won’t go to the Reds, but he would go to the Dodgers.
Scherzer should reconsider. I’ll personally ship him a pint of Graeter’s black raspberry chocolate chip ice cream.
He’d probably compare it to Ted Drewes but secretly like it
You make a strong argument.
Is anybody surprised at this situation? They started the year with the following starters:
1) A guy who might have been hurt in the world series (Gray)
2) Two guys with huge injury histories (Heaney, Eovaldi)
3) A fifth starter they signed just before the season started and needed some time to ramp up (Lorenzen)
4) And Dane Dunning and Cody Bradford
With them being 7 games back and having to jump two teams I think they are probably going to be sellers in a couple of weeks but it didn’t have to be this way.
I also didn’t think the hitters were as good as they were in the 2023 postseason, especially Carter and García.
I didn’t think they were in the Astros class even though they outplayed them in ALCS. I’m not surprised Semien has declined. DH and 1B seemed ok but unexceptional.
I’m pleasantly surprised by Jung and especially Smith. They seemed like a .500 team to me.
DeGrom has such a huge injury history that you completely forgot to mention him in #2.
DeGrom is like Gnarls Barkley or Paul Bunyan or Bigfoot, he doesn’t exist.
I don’t think anyone’s surprised that they’re struggling, and I’m not convinced that this version of the Rangers is going to be back. Their pitching is light, the team is old, and the young players they do have aren’t performing. My gut feeling is that they’re an 80-ish win team next season.
Seager, Heim, Carter, Langford, Jung and Smith have the talent to make a good core. Unfortunately they picked Rocker and Leiter in spots where rotation pieces are needed.
They were hardly alone in rating them that highly.
People always overweight the small sample size post season, especially for the champs. They were a 90 win team last year.
It all depends on the pitching. They don’t really have any pitchers that they can count on performance / health wise that are under team control in 2025. The position players will be great.
It’s the age-old story of the Rangers. They’ve had this exact problem their entire existence.
At least the Cardinals have proven that it is possible to mostly rebuild a pitching staff without crossing the CBT line in a single offseason.
I wouldn’t worry about Scherzer’s no trade clause, I don’t know how much teams are willing to give up for him anyway. If they sell–and I think being below 20% playoff odds around July 25th would make them sellers–then they should focus on the other guys. Eovaldi, Heaney, Yates, and Robertson are having good seasons (Yates is having a great one), and Leclerc and Lorenzen can be useful. Robertson brought back a couple of FV40+ prospects last year and he’s pitching better now, and a few years ago the Tigers got Reese Olson (who was an FV45 at the time) for a rental reliever.
Teams like the Dodgers, Orioles, and Yankees should be in on Yates for sure. And there are a lot of teams that should be very interested in Eovaldi and Heaney (Dodgers and Orioles again, also the Brewers, Red Sox, Guardians, Braves, Cardinals, and Padres). I’m not sure there are many FV50-type prospects in play for Yates but it’s theoretically possible, maybe Will Warren or Kyle Hurt would be available. And for Eovaldi maybe Nick Frasso, Cooper Hjerpe, or Adam Mazur would be available.
TEX could try and package Eovaldi and Yates together to try and get something really tasty from BAL
That might work better with the Dodgers, the Orioles like trading volume. Although the Dodgers don’t have a lot of high-end prospects except De Paula who probably isn’t going anywhere. They’re probably looking to trade Cartaya (whose stock is probably way down), and they might consider Hurt. But maybe if they packaged both together they could get Rushing as a headliner? Plus some depth?
With the Orioles they’re probably looking to trade Norby (who has no place on this team and is trending down). I don’t think they’re trading Kjerstad, Mayo, Basallo, or Holliday for anything short of a higher-end controllable starter.
Scherzer – age 39, ERA good but FIP not nearly as good, also on the IL until recently, makes $22.47M this year (Mets are paying a lot of his salary), has a no-trade and even if he waives it, it limits his value when you can only negotiate with a small handful of teams
Eovaldi – age 34, has been good (though FIP higher than ERA) but has also missed some time, makes $16M this year with a $20M vesting option for 2025 that he is probably going to hit (300 IP between 2023 and 2024, he’s at 231 right now. I don’t know, it’s Eovaldi after all)
Robertson – age 39, has been good but is making $10M this year with a $7M mutual option for next year
Heaney – age 33, has been decent, is signed for $13M but not beyond this year
Leclerc – age 30, hasn’t been great and has been inconsistent over his career, signed for $6.25M this year but not beyond this year
Yates – age 37, been fantastic in a reclamation project coming off arm surgery (I forget whether it was TJ or not), signed for $4.5M this year but not beyond this year
Lorenzen – age 32, ERA good but FIP bad, been pretty meh as a starter in his career, signed for $4.5M
Yes, some of them have been good, but that’s a lot of guys somewhere between past their primes and well past their primes. I defer to those who pay closer attention to trades than I do, but not sure you’re getting a lot for any of them TBH
Age doesn’t really matter much with rentals. No one is buying next year.
It’s not that you get a lot for any of them, it’s that if you trade three or four you get back some interesting projects and fill some depth holes. Versus not trading anyone and not getting anyone back.
The Twins got (for example) Joe Ryan for a half season of Nelson Cruz. That’s the kind of gold you’re hoping to strike. Are you going to get a 50FV plus prospect? No, you are not, but get enough interesting 40FV pitchers and some will work out better than that.
As of right now, the Rangers are 16th is OPS (.697) and 16th in ERA (4.02). (That’s some deeply entrenched mediocrity.) Last year they finished 3rd in OPS (.789) – best in the AL – and 18th in ERA (4.28).
Looks like the pitching plan worked exquisitely well, while their hitters are really struggling with what I am assuming must be a grippier ball with more movement.
Everyone else is having to hit the same ball. It’s just variance. Last year they had more guys over performing and this season the opposite.
I’d add Semien and García to the trade list. They both seem past their prime and have ready replacement possibilities in Smith and Langford. Yankees seem like a good candidate for Semien. Mariners could use both. Yates to anyone. I wouldn’t trade Eovaldi for less than a #2 starter value.
Semien has four more years at $26M per (only $20M in ’28). Why would the Yankees, or anybody really, trade anything for that?
He’s still a good player. Teams would want him, if maybe not at that price. The Rangers would have to eat some money if they wanted any return.
I wonder if they would put him on waivers and see if anyone takes that contract. His ZiPS RoS is 2 WAR, that’s a pretty big deadline upgrade if you’re in need and it only costs the money and no talent. It’d be an interesting experiment and nothing to lose.
He’s still been worth 2 WAR so far this year and y’all are acting like he’s an anvil???
xStats suggest he’s gotten a little unlucky, xBA and xSLG both 30 points above his actuals. Playing great defense… this guy still has positive trade value and isn’t going anywhere.
He’s still a good player, as I said. He turns 34 this fall and is owed 98m in 2025-2028. I’d bet the Rangers would be totally content to let another team take the back end of that contract.
Semien not going anywhere, anchor of the team.
Ah yes, the World Series hangover year. The 2003 Angels, 2007 Cardinals, 2014 Red Sox, 2015 Royals all say hello. Bochy himself was the skipper of probably the most hangoveriest team of the 2013 Giants.
And when the Rangers come back in 2025 they’ll be the odd year version of Bochy’s even-year Giants dynasty.
You mean the 2016 Royals. 2015 is the year they won.
Terribly disappointing season thus far off the heels of that magical run. Stunned the offense had been so poor through June. Some signs of life lately, but Semien, Garcia, Heim, and Taveras have just not had it. Would not mind selling guys like Lorenzen and Heaney and trying to make a push with additions of Jung, Carter, Bradford, Mahle, and Degrom in the second-half.
deGrom projected for like 4 starts
Old school baseball concept here, but try it out: You win more games by driving a competitive we win games attitude, then you do by driving a we’ll try again next year attitude.
Future results are not established by projections and you will get better results from your roster by sticking to winning is the plan.
2023 Angels notwithstanding.