The Tigers and the Other Side of the Win Curve

To be honest, I really don’t like to speculate on offseasons. Especially offseasons of previously aggressive teams, with so many quality players remaining on the market. I just recently heard about a significant trade that came within a hair of happening between two hopeful contenders, and no one ever caught wind of it as a rumor. There’s a whole lot that goes on as an industry secret, so I really don’t know what teams are up to. But, forced to speculate, I’d say the Tigers seem just about finished. I don’t think that’s a team that’s going to make another splash, and the roster looks more or less like a finished product.

And so, for the Tigers, it’s been an interesting and uncharacteristic sort of offseason. The Tigers, unquestionably, are in position to contend, and to contend for the World Series. Teams like that, you usually see add players and add payroll. But for Detroit it was more an offseason of acting on fiscal responsibility. The biggest name involved in their offseason is Prince Fielder, and he was sent away. They waved goodbye to a pair of quality free-agent middle infielders. They dealt a good starter to D.C. for a young and underwhelming package. Overall, the Tigers saved some money and set themselves up better for the future. It was odd timing, but there’s an angle that might help explain the thought process. At least, it’s an angle that recognizes what the Tigers still are.

In terms of significant players, it’s a simple offseason to summarize. Doug Fister is gone, and Drew Smyly will take his place in the rotation. Jhonny Peralta is gone, and Jose Iglesias will take his place at shortstop. Prince Fielder is gone, and Miguel Cabrera will take his place at first, with Nick Castellanos then taking Cabrera’s place at third. Omar Infante is gone, and Ian Kinsler will take his place at second. Joaquin Benoit is gone, and Joe Nathan will take his place at closer. Also, Rajai Davis and Joba Chamberlain and Ian Krol are new, replacing other role players. Once again, it’s a good team that feels pretty light on depth.

These moves seem to represent something of a step back, at least in the immediate. Smyly’s talented, but he’s no Doug Fister. Iglesias is talented, but he’s no Jhonny Peralta, probably. Castellanos is talented, but there are questions about both his offense and defense at third base. Kinsler, at least, is roughly Infante’s equivalent, if not a bit better. Nathan’s got a hell of an arm. Davis is perfectly useful in a limited way.

Contending teams don’t often take apparent steps back. A year ago, the Tigers were one of the very best teams in baseball, making them the definition of a team that wants to win now. And yet, despite everything, the Tigers remain one of the very best teams in baseball. If this offseason has influenced their odds, it hasn’t influenced them by very much.

Our team-level projections are flawed, because they’re based on human-generated depth charts and imperfect player projections. So, they’re not good science, but they are good for conveying an idea. Conceding that the offseason isn’t over, right now the Marlins project for the fewest WAR in the majors. At the top, one finds the Red Sox, despite their losses. And right there in second are the Tigers, sandwiched between the Sox and the Rays. They’re ahead, of course, of the Royals, and they’re ahead, of course, of the Indians. It’s not even worth mentioning the Twins or the White Sox.

The likelihood is that, right now, the Tigers remain the clear favorites to win the AL Central. The Royals have a chance, and they’ve seemingly improved, but they’ve also lost Ervin Santana and their rotation leaves plenty to be desired. The Indians have a chance, and they’ve made a few interesting low buys, but they’ve also lost Ubaldo Jimenez and Scott Kazmir and they threw a lot of pretty good innings. All three contenders are flawed, and the Tigers might be the least flawed, and so it seems they remain the team to beat.

So we can talk a bit about the win curve. It’s basically playoff probability based on a team’s win total, and wins become the most important right around the fringes of contention. Wins become ultra-valuable to teams that might be pushed over the top. All wins, of course, are some kind of valuable, but they tend to be most valuable when you’re trying to close a gap. If you want, you can think of those as “high-leverage” wins. This kind of thinking is used to justify what might seem like overpayments. It’s why Shin-Soo Choo would be more valuable to, say, the Rangers than the Astros.

Wins are important to the Tigers. They’re going to need many of them! And there’s value in maintaining or expanding a gap between yourself and another contender. But because the Tigers are the division favorites, a lost win for them means less than a gained win for the Royals. The Tigers have a fairly high playoff probability, and a fairly high ALDS probability. The teams behind them have lower and more volatile probabilities, with more to gain and more to lose. The simplest way of thinking about it: the Tigers are reasonably secure as favorites, allowing them some flexibility provided they didn’t dismantle themselves somehow.

And they didn’t do that. They got maybe a little bit worse, but they improved their situation in the future. They have no long-term commitment to Peralta, or Infante. They get to see what Iglesias and Castellanos can do, and they could be parts of a long-term core. Most significantly, the Tigers swapped Fielder’s money for Kinsler’s money. Even with Detroit chipping in $30 million to go to Texas, that still comes out to a total savings of $76 million, which is an enormous amount of money, even if it means less than ever before. That money means future wins, provided it doesn’t end up in an owner’s pocket, and pretty much every move is about balancing the present against the eventual present.

The Tigers are built to win now, but that doesn’t mean they should just forget about the future. This offseason they borrowed a little from the present to improve the future picture, but because of their present situation that doesn’t look like such a bad idea. Of course the Fister trade is still weird and it still looks like it was a bad call, but the Tigers were going to move one of their starters. Going forward, the Tigers’ playoff odds are a little bit worse than they could’ve been. But they’re still really strong, and now they’re stronger for subsequent seasons. Trying to win now doesn’t mean trying to win now at all costs.

Had the Tigers elected to keep the band together, they’d be in slightly better shape for 2014. As is, they didn’t do everything perfectly, but they took a step toward sustainability. And the roster they still have, in case you haven’t looked at it, is really pretty super.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

69 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Timeghoul
10 years ago

I’m glad this article was written. I don’t see the Tigers taking a step back at all, honestly. They underperformed their pythagorean record by 6 wins last year, which was 99-63. On top of that, their offense underperformed the expected number of runs relative to their wRC+ by 40 runs. As a result, last year’s team was probably a true 103-104 win team or so based on the results they had. Due to their terrible lack of speed and volatile bullpen, they didn’t come close to their true performance level. This year, I think they’ll be much closer with their much more balanced lineup that can actually run quite a bit now. They should coast to another Central title.

Dan
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

agreed.

They won their division by only 1 game, but Pythagorean records showed an 8 game difference between them and Cleveland with KC well behind.

Even with the minor decreases in the strength of their team this upcoming season, they are still overwhelming division favorites in 2014 (probably a bigger favorite than any other team in any other division) since neither KC nor Cleveland appear to be drastically better than last year.

Since the playoffs are a complete crap shoot, why not trim some fat from the future budget? Fister was their #4 starter anyways and would have minimal value in a playoff series when you can already trot out Verlander, Scherzer, and Sanchez with either Porcello or Smyly as reasonable #4 starters that would be better than most other teams they would face.

Jaack
10 years ago
Reply to  Dan

And based on 2nd order wins, the Tigers had a 19 game lead over the Indians!

Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  Dan

So here’s a thing about Pythagorean expectations. They take no account of MOV game to game. You only need a one run lead to win, basically. You’d probably get a more nuanced view of how well the Tigers actually played if you could account for the fact that they had more 10 run wins than any other team last year, for instance. Indeed, given how historically terrible they are defensively at certain positions, I’d argue that the wins they lost due to defense fallibility more than explains why their pythagorean expectation didn’t match up with their actual total.

Dan
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe

is there any evidence whatsoever that teams with bad defenses win more games by 10+ runs and fewer games by 1 run?

Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe

other than simply if two teams score equivalent runs and one has more ten run wins they’re going to win fewer games than the other team?

asdfasdf
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Historically terrible? Hyperbole much?

Slimy
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

You’re forgetting they lost Fister; Scherzer most likely had a career year; Sanchez definitely had a career year; they lost Benoit; they lost Smyly as a reliever; Miguel Cabrera likely had a career year; they lost Peralta; and they lost Infante. It’s not as easy as saying what the 2013 team was supposed to do since they’re not the same team.

Timeghoul
10 years ago
Reply to  Slimy

Well this is a pointless comment. Avila had the worst season of his career, Jackson had the second worst season of his career, Dirks was atrocious b/c of an injured knee all year long, Peralta didn’t even play the last 50 games anyway, Infante missed 50 games with injury (and Kinsler is better so…), Smyly pitched almost exclusively in low-leverage situations so his dominant numbers didn’t even matter, Benoit was replaced with Nathan, Sanchez might’ve had a career year but Porcello’s ERA was drastically higher than his peripherals, Verlander has one of the worst seasons of his career…

do I have to go on?

Slimy
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

If you want, you can continue. Dirks posted career high defensive #s and it’s not like he’s a true talent 132 wRC+ hitter. Peralta missed 50 games, but he still had a career year when he did play in the other 100. Kinsler is only a slight upgrade over Infante (who was also very good when he was healthy), plus you’ll be missing Fielder now. Porcello’s ERA has consistently been higher than his FIP.

Now that that is out of the way, let’s agree on what my main point was: it’s not as easy as saying X team underperformed their wRC+ and Pythagorean. It would require a much more detailed anaylsis that would also look at how players underperformed or underperformed (and I agree with you that some Tigers underperformed as well as overperformed).

Dan
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

Peralta’s WAR last season was the 4th highest of his career. When you account for the 50 games missed, it most certainly was not a career year.

The Party Bird
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

Prince only contributed two wins last year. He wasn’t a main reason why the Tigers were good.

Re: Porcello, 2014 will probably have the best infield defense he’s ever pitched in front of. His ERA is going down.

Aidan Hall
10 years ago
Reply to  Slimy

You’re forgetting that Smyly is more valuable as a starter, Nathan is probably a slight upgrade over Benoit, Iglesias is probably only a slight downgrade from Peralta due to his defense and Peralta had close to a career year last year, they replaced Infante with Kinsler and Cabrera will be more valuable at first base. They’re not the same team, but they’re basically just as good.

Baltar
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

Oh, give me a break. Pythag doesn’t prove anything.

Detroit Michael
10 years ago
Reply to  Timeghoul

Don’t forget that the Tigers lost about 20 runs (or two wins) due to baserunning. Not steals / caught stealing but the rest of baserunning. It was a slow team.

That’s a slight adjustment to your calculations.