FanGraphs Weekly Mailbag: August 23, 2025

Gary A. Vasquez and Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

One of the funniest things to come out of this mailbag column so far occurred two weeks ago, when I wrote about the most replacement-level players of all time. I began that week’s mailbag by talking about questions that require both quantitative data and subjective analysis to answer, and I used the question “Who is the greatest baseball player of all time?” as an example. I made it quite clear that I wasn’t going to give my opinion on the subject; instead, I explained how people might consider the question and formulate their arguments, and in doing so, I mentioned a few of the best players ever. Nothing to it.

Except, of course, I should’ve known that you wonderful baseball sickos couldn’t resist hashing out that debate in the comments. A good number of you latched on to the part about how someone might give Barry Bonds the edge over Babe Ruth because “Bonds wouldn’t have been allowed to play during Ruth’s career.” Readers also made points about expansion and cited U.S. census numbers to compare the population sizes of major league baseball and the country. I truly did not expect any of that.

So maybe I should be prepared for anything with the question I answered to begin this week’s mailbag, which also deals with all-time great players and lineups. It’s quantitative for sure, but context is also necessary to understand why things turned out the way they did. It’s a fun one, so let’s get to it. Before we do, though, I’ll remind you all that while anyone can submit a question, this mailbag is exclusive to FanGraphs Members. If you aren’t yet a Member and would like to keep reading, you can sign up for a Membership here. It’s the best way to both experience the site and support our staff, and it comes with a bunch of other great benefits. Also, if you’d like to ask a question for an upcoming mailbag, send me an email at mailbag@fangraphs.com.
__





Matt is the associate editor of FanGraphs. Previously, he was the baseball editor at Sports Illustrated. His work has appeared in The New York Times, Men’s Health, Baseball Prospectus, and Lindy’s Sports Magazine. Follow him on Twitter @ByMattMartell and Blue Sky @mattmartell.bsky.social.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sadtromboneMember since 2020
21 days ago

That comment about “best player of all time” needing some context seems to also be relevant to the “team matchup with most WAR.” I’m pretty sure that four of the top 10 being Yankees-Athletics during a roughly 5-year span is mostly about (1) the distribution of talent across teams, which is kind of what this is about but also (2) how bad a replacement player was before integration.

Just for fun, I went to look up the Red Sox between 1925 and 1934. I set the minimum playing time to 200 PAs / innings and I don’t think I recognized a single name. They gave over a thousand PAs to a guy named Rabbit Warstler who couldn’t hit even hit doubles at Fenway (I had to look this up to make sure the wall was there then, and it was). They only had three pitchers with more than a thousand innings and one of them had an ERA- of 110. Can you imagine what the alternatives must have been?

raregokusMember since 2022
21 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

A couple other highlights from this rabbit hole: Shano Collins inexplicably getting 1700+ PA to put up a tidy -4 WAR; the mere fact of Bill Wambsganss’s surname

PC1970Member since 2024
21 days ago
Reply to  raregokus

Is he the grandfather of Tom Wambsganss, spouse of Shiv Roy & the eventual successor in Succession?

gettwobrute79Member since 2025
20 days ago
Reply to  raregokus

I was never able to grasp that his name is that long with only two vowels.

Greg SimonsMember since 2016
20 days ago
Reply to  raregokus

Bill Wambsganss, the only player in history to turn an unassisted triple play in the World Series.

raregokusMember since 2022
20 days ago
Reply to  Greg Simons

These replies have really opened my eyes to the multitudes contained within the Wambsganss

gettwobrute79Member since 2025
20 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

No love for Earl Webb and his 67 doubles in one season? I believe that record still stands.

The Red Sox at that time were mostly a feeder system for other club as they had no money. Any good players they came up with (Red Ruffing to name one), went on to bigger and better things away from Boston. Once Yawkey bought the Red Sox. that changed.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
20 days ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

I have never heard of Earl Webb! Looks like he had a couple of great years for the Red Sox using the wall as a backboard, then got traded, and fell off so hard he was out of the league.

This makes me wonder–what hitter was the biggest creation of the Monster? Not all of the doubles are going to be off the wall, especially for ones on the road, but a whole lot of them are going to be. And the splits tool only goes back to 2002, I think, so this might have to be a B-Ref query.

PC1970Member since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The answer is probably Wade Boggs.

His career OPS in Fenway (which includes his years in NYY & TB when he was on the downside) was .991. It was probably over 1.000 in his Boston years.

His career OPS was .858, which means out of Fenway it must have been a bit south of .800.

I’d have to manually calculate it to really know & I just don’t have that time.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
18 days ago
Reply to  PC1970

Career home: .354/.443/.491/.934
Career away: .302/.387/.395/.781

That includes his non-BOS years, obviously.