Hey, Is That the 2015 Bryce Harper?
So I don’t want to make too much of a couple swings early in spring training but…
Here’s Bryce Harper’s first at-bat of the spring from last week.
First at-bat? Forget about it.@Bharper3407 is ridiculous: https://t.co/3HzORPyfAB #Crushed pic.twitter.com/tH6L6wGorB
— MLB (@MLB) February 25, 2017
And here’s his second homer in nine spring at-bats, an event having taken place on Thursday.
SEE. YOU. LATER. @Bharper3407 pic.twitter.com/Q70q2AY0vK
— Washington Nationals (@Nationals) March 2, 2017
In Harper’s first four spring games, he’s gone 4-of-9 with two homers and three walks against two strikeouts. It’s really early. This might not mean anything. But after last season’s dramatic decline from his 10-win, MVP-earning 2015 campaign, maybe it’s something. There were whispers about Harper playing through a shoulder injury last season, and his agent Scott Boras said last month that there was “an issue” with which Harper dealt. There sure seemed to be something not quite right.

His average exit velocity on fly balls and line drives fell from 94.5 mph in 2015 to 92.7 last season. Here’s his rolling 2015 exit velocity compared to the league average from Baseball Savant…

And his 2016 average exit velocity…

Or maybe the Cubs just got in Harper’s head in early May, walking him 13 times in a four-game series, three times intentionally. After a 19% walk rate during the first half of last season, that mark slipped to 14.7% in the second half. At the same time, his strikeout rate rose from 15.8% to 22.8%. But this is a player who posted a 20% walk rate in 2015. He’s used to being pitched around. So maybe Harper was playing through injury, though he or the Nationals never acknowledged that. Maybe he fell out of a good approach and comfort level at the plate. Maybe it was a combination of factors.
Whatever the reason, his very different 2015 and 2016 seasons make him one of the more interesting players to watch early this season. And if you believe he was hurting after an outstanding April last season, he sure looks healthy right now.
The expectations for 2017 are tempered surrounding a player who is considered to be a generational talent. PECOTA is projecting a four-win season, a .270/.375/.501 slash line, and 27 homers in 575 plate appearances. ZiPS forecasts 4.4 WAR, 29 homers, and a .280/.406/.521 slash line over 600 plate appearances. The Fans projections have Harper being about equal in value to Gary Sanchez.
While Harper’s 2015 was fueled by to some extent by an overperformance on fly balls, pulling a Tyler Naquin, it was still an all-time great season.
And while it’s dangerous to make something of a few spring at bats, sometimes they can mean something. And if these two swings indicate Harper is healthier than he was a year ago, then perhaps he’s a good bet to exceed his projections, and do some in dramatically.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
I hope 2015 Harper is back. I want him to kill it this year and next year. I want the Nationals to go all in in 2017 and 2018 and strip their farm system bare. Then I want to watch them weep bitter tears when Harper walks during his free agency year and the team implodes due to a barren farm system and deferred payments that prevent them from signing quality free agents.
Who hurt you
I’m a Braves fan. 2015 and 2016 hurt me.
I like the dumpster fire avatar.
Sounds good to me.
Projections for Harper are tempered, but expectations never have been. Among the myriad examples, folks started talking up a $300 million FA contract in 2015, when he was still 3+ years away. Maybe *that* got in his head, as much as Maddon’s IBB mindf***ery.
It would be interesting to see his future play out in an alternate reality, where he’d never been dubbed a “generational talent,” and/or his MLB production had been spread more evenly over his first 5 years. But that ship has sailed. Even if Harper ran off 5 straight years at his excellent career rates of 139 wRC+ and 5.3 fWAR per 150 games, folks would still be looking for another level.
I want Harper to have a long and great career. I want to be able to go into my dotage as someone who got to watch Trout and Harper have extended and spectacular careers, the way it seemed we would with ARod and Griffey, or earlier generations did with Williams and DiMaggio or Mantle and Mays.
That said, it would amuse me to no end if the Yankees or Red Sox or Dodgers gave Harper a $500M/10 Year contract and then watched as injuries sidelined him for most of it.
This made me look them up and ARod and Griffey are #6 and 7 for career WAR through age 26. Pujols was 12th. Trout, by the way, is 10th with 2 more seasons to go. Trout has a great chance to be top 3 (needs 10 more) and an outside chance at best ever (needs 16 more).
Harper was obviously hurt last year. So is it wrong to trust the projections since they don’t take that into account? This is an example where the eye test trumps the projections. If Harper plays 150 games, he’ll be MVP or close to it.