Matt Harvey Looks to Add Spark to Mets’ Season

In a move that has been long desired by New York fans, the Mets are handing the ball to prospect Matt Harvey. The right-hander has been recalled from triple-A and will make his debut on Thursday night against the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Harvey, 23, was the club’s first round draft pick (7th overall) out of the University of North Carolina during the 2010 amateur draft. He’s made a quick climb through the minor league system since then and opened 2012 in triple-A. The hurler had a bit of a bumpy April but cruised through May and June by striking out 72 batters in 66.1 innings of work. In a total of 110 innings on the year, Harvey has an impressive strikeout rate of 9.16 K/9.

His control has been inconsistent throughout the year so he may struggle a bit during his first taste of the major leagues while he tries to fill in for injured veteran starter Johan Santana. Harvey features a low-to-mid-90s fastball and a very good slider. The continued development of his changeup is important to his future success as a big league starter.

Harvey came in at No. 26 on my pre-season Top 100 prospects list and was the No. 2 prospect on FanGraphs’ pre-season New York Mets Top 15 prospect list. He came in just behind fellow right-handed prospect Zack Wheeler. The former Giants prospect, who’s currently pitching at the double-A level, has the slight edge on overall ceiling but Harvey should be – at worst – an innings-eating third starter.

The New York Mets are currently in third place in the National League East division, 10.5 games behind the Nationals. The organization is fighting five teams ahead of them for one of the two wild card spots in the 2012 playoffs. With only two healthy, above-average pitchers in R.A. Dickey and Jon Niese, Harvey has an opportunity to help solidify the starting rotation until some of the veteran arms return from the infirmary.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Marc Hulet has been writing at FanGraphs since 2008. His work focuses on prospects and fantasy. Follow him on Twitter @marchulet.

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
chri521
13 years ago

I think if he provides us with some Pelfrey-esque numbers, that would be a huge improvement and boon for the team over the likes of Miguel Batista, Schwinden, etc.

ryan
13 years ago
Reply to  chri521

Cant imagine many mets fans want to associate harvey with mike pelfrey in the slightest

chri521
13 years ago
Reply to  ryan

Probably not but I think we’ll take that mediocre / above average level of performance for now given the current alternatives.

ZenMadman
13 years ago
Reply to  ryan

I’d rather see like 11 strikeouts per game, though. 🙂

Dongcopter
13 years ago
Reply to  chri521

Can you compromise and settle for Pulsipher-esque numbers?