The Nationals Are a Catching Catastrophe

Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

I will break all this down. You will get your thousand words. But sometimes a graph does most of the work for you, so let’s just get to it. Here’s the WAR put up by the catchers of every team so far this season:

Wait, sorry. Wrong graph. That one only has 29 teams. My mistake. Let me throw the Nationals on there real quick:

So yeah. That changes things a bit. What the hell is happening in Washington DC? I’m not sure any of the million ways you could answer that question would provide good news, but this catcher situation is its own kind of ugly.

Nationals backstops have put up -1.7 WAR this season, a full 1.5 worse than the Angels in 29th place. These are not replacement-level killers. These are killers who live far beneath the earth’s surface, digging tunnels, crushing people with rocks, blowing them up — wait, I guess I’m just describing Dig Dug, but you get the point. Washington’s catchers rank 29th in wRC+ and 30th in baserunning and overall offense. They rank 28th in catcher ERA. According to Statcast, they rank 30th in blocking, 30th in framing, and – hey, look at that! – 13th in caught stealing above average. So it’s not all bad.

We have team positional splits going back to 2002, and over that period, the 2009 Pirates and 2019 Rangers are the worst teams on record, with -3.1 WAR each. The Nationals catchers are on pace for -3.8 WAR. They’re on pace to break the record before Labor Day! Over our 24-season sample, the Nationals’ -1.7 catcher WAR has already sunk to them to the 14th-worst total ever recorded. They needed just 75 games to put up more negative value than the other 707 teams on the list. They dropped three spots just last night! This is truly execrable stuff. So let’s ask again, what the hell is happening behind the plate in DC? Here’s the bottom of the catcher leaderboard. Note that unlike the numbers you’ve seen so far, the table below shows total WAR accrued by catchers, not just WAR accrued while playing catcher:

2025 Catcher WAR (Non-)Leaderboard
Name Team PA HR wRC+ FRV WAR
Jacob Stallings COL 93 0 1 -2 -0.9
Keibert Ruiz WSN 249 2 65 -7 -0.9
Riley Adams WSN 56 2 -19 -3 -0.8
Endy Rodríguez PIT 57 0 38 -2 -0.6
Ben Rortvedt TBR 70 0 -9 -1 -0.6
Maverick Handley BAL 46 0 -40 0 -0.5
Martín Maldonado SDP 108 3 47 -4 -0.4
Gary Sánchez BAL 47 5 65 -1 -0.2
Blake Sabol BOS 18 0 -14 0 -0.2

Well, that’s one way to end up at the bottom of the list. Only two players have caught a game for the Nationals this season, and they rank second- and third-to-last in WAR. Keibert Ruiz has not been the worst offensive catcher in baseball, but because he ranks sixth in plate appearances, he has accrued the most negative offensive value. His defense grades out as the worst among all catchers according to Statcast’s fielding run value, and fourth worst according to DRS. Riley Adams is right behind him, thanks to a -19 wRC+ and his own defensive struggles. So far this season, 28 different individual catchers have hit more home runs than the Nationals have as a team at the catcher position.

As for the other players on the list, Jacob Stallings was so bad that he was released by the Rockies. Endy Rodríguez and Ben Rortvedt have also lost their respective jobs. Maverick Handley was just filling in and is back in Norfolk now that Gary Sánchez has returned from a wrist injury. You see where I’m going here. Almost everyone on this list has been bad over a tiny sample. Some of them were only pressed into service because of an injury in the first place. The only players on this list who are still receiving regular playing time are Ruiz and the WAR-defying Martín Maldonado, whom we should probably be calling The Big Intangible. Playing this badly will cost you your spot – even over a small sample, even in Colorado – but not in Washington.

The Nationals came into the season ranked 27th at catcher in our Positional Power Rankings, with a projected 1.5 WAR. They’ve already raced past that total in the opposite direction, but it’s not like this scenario was unforeseeable, or even unprecedented. Here’s what Leo Morgenstern wrote about Ruiz at the time: “Here’s the good news: Our projections think Ruiz can hit like he did in 2023 and catch like he did in 2024. It isn’t a sexy profile, but it’s enough to merit a starting job at the big league level.”

Instead, Ruiz is hitting like he did in 2024, and his defense metrics have regressed to right between the numbers he put up in 2023 and 2024. That’s a bummer, but it’s certainly not a shock. Adams is experiencing some bad batted ball luck – he’s probably not going to keep running a .103 BABIP – but he came into the season with a career 89 wRC+, and his defense has graded out roughly the same as it did in previous seasons. In other words, Ruiz and Adams are so far behind their projections because the projections assumed they’d regress to the mean, but they’ve instead gotten even worse. Ruiz is currently on pace to put up -2.0 WAR. According to our database, that would be the 13th-worst catcher season in major league history. And somehow, even though he’s only gotten into 20 games, Adams is on pace for the 28th-worst of all-time.

Unfortunately, for as far below replacement level as Washington’s catchers have been, there aren’t any obvious replacements available. When Eric Longenhagen ranked the Nationals top 32 prospects last May, Drew Millas was the only catcher who made the list. He ranked seventh with a Future Value of 45, but he’s currently running a 75 wRC+ in Triple-A Rochester. His 28.6% hard-hit rate puts him in just the eighth percentile (among Triple-A players with at least 150 PAs). As a whole, Washington’s catchers throughout the minors are running a 101 wRC+, which ranks 25th. They only have one catcher above Single-A with a wRC+ above 75. Millas will probably be up at some point. He’s had cups of coffee in each of the last two seasons, and even after his lousy start, the projection systems see him as better than both Ruiz and Adams right now.

The bigger problem is that there isn’t all that much reason for the Nationals to change course. Ruiz is in the third year of an eight-year deal (with club options for two more years beyond that). The team is tied to him, and publicly at least, still considers him part of the exciting young core that is now starting to coalesce. James Wood, MacKenzie Gore, and CJ Abrams are thriving. Luis García Jr. just put up a three-win season and is running good underlying numbers despite iffy results. Dylan Crews is still waiting for his own topline numbers to catch up to his impressive peripherals. Brady House just arrived in Washington. But the Nationals are still nowhere near being a competitive team. The supporting pieces aren’t there. The pitching staff isn’t there. Regardless of Dave Martinez’s recent comments in support of his coaching staff, the team also ranks at or near the bottom in both defense and baserunning.

The Nationals started the season with a 3% chance of making the playoffs, and they’re now down to 0.1%. They’re still acting like they don’t expect to compete, largely limiting their acquisitions to one-year deals for veterans they can flip at the deadline. Maybe general manager Mike Rizzo will decide it’s time to sign some players and make a run at it after the season ends, but this year is already lost. The best the team can hope for at the catcher position right now is snagging an underperforming veteran on the waiver wire to take Adams’ place and Millas performing solidly in a call-up. And if Ruiz’s performance doesn’t turn around, they’re almost certain to set a particularly ignominious record.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dangledangleMember since 2024
7 hours ago

Ruiz is 26 it’s surprising that his wRC+has decreased each year at a time that he should be peaking.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
7 hours ago
Reply to  dangledangle

That is what happens when your player development system is completely broken.

O'KieboomerMember since 2021
6 hours ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

So if you’re launching off from Ruiz, who came over basically MLB ready, how do you explain the disparate outcomes in the prospects from the Turner/Scherzer trade vs. the Soto trade? It’d be especially odd in the cases of Abrams and Gore, who have taken steps forward in each year since they came over. Maybe Wood is just a special talent, hell maybe all 3 are, but doesn’t jibe with your thesis.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
6 hours ago
Reply to  O'Kieboomer

From Rosenthal: “Since 2013, the Nationals have drafted and developed only three players with career bWARs above 5.0. Those three — Nick Pivetta, Erick Fedde, Jesús Luzardo — made their marks with other teams.”

With respect to position players overall (not just draftees), they have been way below average in walk rate and way above average in ground ball rate for 5 straight years. Highly-touted prospects have consistently flamed out, and they haven’t had any luck with pop-up guys or bargain bin shopping. By and large, players do not improve when they come here, they stagnate. It is good that Gore is finally good but it took them too long to get him there, he’s more likely a trade asset at this point given the stinginess of the Nats’ current ownership.

Last edited 5 hours ago by Ryan DC
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 hours ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

That’s not good, and it is in fact very bad, but I must object to the whole method Rosenthal is using. These “draft and develop” metrics often make a single team look bad because:
A) It excludes international players, and international players are like 15%-20% of MLB players
B) They don’t get credit for the players they drafted and traded away before they developed. This means there’s a huge pool of players who don’t get credit for getting “developed” by anyone (see: Luis Castillo, pitcher).

Let’s look at the team that is currently leading the league in wins–the Tigers. I’ll use fWAR because it’s easier, but here’s the list of players who they “drafted and developed” who have had more than 5 fWAR for them since 2013.

  1. Tarik Skubal
  2. Riley Greene
  3. Kerry Carpenter
  4. Spencer Turnbull
  5. Jake Rogers (this one is pretty suspect, he is +41.6 on defense)

That’s it. Turns out, a lot of players are excluded when they were drafted (so no international players) and developed by the same team. Let’s take a look at another team–the Brewers. Supposedly, they have a great development pipeline. You would think they are loaded with guys they drafted and developed. But here are the only players on the current 26-man roster who would qualify as being drafted and developed by the Brewers:

  1. Sal Frelick
  2. Brice Turang
  3. Jacob Misiorowski
  4. Aaron Ashby

The other twenty two players were acquired in some other way. Jackson Chourio doesn’t count. Freddy Peralta doesn’t count. Joey Ortiz doesn’t count. Chad Patrick doesn’t count.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
1 minute ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Most of those guys are currently stars or at least starters on their current teams. So by comparison the Nats still fall well short.

NATS FanMember since 2018
3 hours ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

Completely broken is a bit harsh. Wood, Gore, Abrams are all extremely talented guys. But it’s been a very long time since we have had an effective defensive catcher. Catcher development is certainly broken.