2009 MLB Trade Value: Recap by Dave Cameron July 20, 2009 The countdown is finally over – this afternoon, we unveiled the top five pieces in our annual Trade Value series. Since this is a recap post, here’s the whole list in one convenient spot. 1. Evan Longoria 2. Hanley Ramirez 3. Justin Upton 4. Albert Pujols 5. Matt Wieters 6. Brian McCann 7. David Wright 8. Ryan Braun 9. Tim Lincecum 10. Chase Utley 11. Zack Greinke 12. Grady Sizemore 13. Dan Haren 14. Matt Kemp 15. Troy Tulowitzki 16. Joe Mauer 17. Felix Hernandez 18. Colby Rasmus 19. Adam Jones 20. Jose Reyes 21. B.J. Upton 22. Curtis Granderson 23. Justin Verlander 24. Stephen Strasburg 25. David Price 26. Jay Bruce 27. James Shields 28. Chad Billingsley 29. Clayton Kershaw 30. Josh Johnson 31. Dustin Pedroia 32. Ian Kinsler 33. Ubaldo Jimenez 34. Jon Lester 35. Nick Markakis 36. Josh Hamilton 37. Roy Halladay 38. Clay Buchholz 39. Jason Heyward 40. Tommy Hanson 41. Josh Beckett 42. Joba Chamberlain 43. Ryan Zimmerman 44. Max Scherzer 45. Adrian Gonzalez 46. Elvis Andrus 47. Robinson Cano 48. Cole Hamels 49. Jered Weaver 50. Prince Fielder Honorable Mentions: Ben Zobrist, Kevin Youkilis, Javier Vazquez, Gordon Beckham, Pablo Sandoval. The biggest riser from last year? Matt Kemp, who went from unranked (whoops) to #14. I just missed the boat on him last year. The biggest faller was Brandon Webb, who dropped off the list after ranking #14 last year. Shoulder problems that cost you a full season without a firm diagnosis will do that to you, especially as you head towards free agency. Overall, I’m happy with the list. After receiving some feedback, there are a few things I’d change, however. Unfortunately, I was unaware of the clause in Troy Tulowitzki’s contract allowing him to void his deal if he’s traded. That’s a pretty nasty contract kicker, and one I really should have been aware of. That’s my fault, and had I known about that, he would have ranked lower, certainly. However, I did find that the uproar about his true talent level exposed the fact that Tulowitzki is a pretty underrated player by a lot of the readers here. He’s a 24-year-old shortstop with above average defense and power who has significantly upped his walk rate this season. Players with his skillset are remarkably valuable. We love WAR around here, obviously, but this is not a list of what players have accomplished to date, so quoting Tulowitzki’s inferior WAR to other players simply doesn’t work as an argument about his present trade value. He’s a really, really good up the middle player headed for his prime. There aren’t many guys out there with his projected future value. A lot of the “why isn’t this guy on the list?” questions came from fans of National League teams with good-but-not-great young pitchers. Yovanni Gallardo, Adam Wainwright, Matt Cain, and Jordan Zimmermann are all valuable assets, but trying to make an argument for them based on their non-league adjusted numbers simply doesn’t work. Put simply, the National League is vastly inferior to the AL right now, and the lack of a DH allows for pitchers who pitch in the senior circuit to post superficially better numbers than their AL peers. Simply put, you stick a guy like Chamberlain in the NL, and he’d look like Cy Young. Sorry, NL fans, but your pitchers aren’t as good as you think. And, finally, I guess I should address the whole Sandoval thing. As I said in the Honorable Mentions post, I like Sandoval – the kid can hit. But based on the comments early on in the series, Giant fans need to pull back on the hyperbole train. 503 major league career plate appearances is simply not anything close to enough to establish his current batting line as his true talent level. There’s a reason ZIPS projects him for a .357 wOBA going forward despite his tremendous start to the 2009 season – he simply cannot maintain a .360 batting average on balls in play over the long term, which is the driving force behind his .400 wOBA this year. The foundation of his offensive performance to date is, unfortunately, not a repeatable skill. For a player with that kind of developed body, you simply can’t project future growth like you can with most 22-year-olds (where strength is tied to added muscle as the body develops, which simply won’t happen with Kung Fu Panda), so there’s less upside here than with most players his age. He’s a good player, not a great one. That’s it for this year’s Trade Value series. Hope you enjoyed it. We’ll do it again next year.