The 2017 campaign has been an unprecedented one for the home run. Both by overall totals and by rate, no other season rivals the present one by that measure.
Seasonal Ranks by Home-Run Totals, Rates
Season |
PA |
HR |
Rank |
HR% |
Rank |
2017 |
178,935 |
5914 |
1 |
3.3% |
1 |
2000 |
190,261 |
5693 |
2 |
3.0% |
3 |
2016 |
184,578 |
5610 |
3 |
3.0% |
2 |
1999 |
189,692 |
5528 |
4 |
2.9% |
5 |
2001 |
186,976 |
5458 |
5 |
2.9% |
4 |
2004 |
188,541 |
5451 |
6 |
2.9% |
6 |
2006 |
188,071 |
5386 |
7 |
2.9% |
7 |
2003 |
187,460 |
5207 |
8 |
2.8% |
9 |
1998 |
188,284 |
5064 |
9 |
2.7% |
12 |
2002 |
186,632 |
5059 |
10 |
2.7% |
11 |
1996 |
177,261 |
4962 |
11 |
2.8% |
8 |
1987 |
161,922 |
4458 |
22 |
2.8% |
10 |
Included: top-10 seasonal marks both by home-run total and rate.
The causes are manifold: a juiced ball, smaller stadia, a greater effort among hitters to hit the ball in the air, etc. A number of questions have been and will be asked about the implications of this season. The present dispatch concerns only one of them, though — namely, who (if anyone) will serve as the lasting face of this year’s record home-run campaign?
Allow me to begin by saying: I don’t care. Or, more precisely: I don’t care about the answer, per se. If it’s important to someone that Giancarlo Stanton forever remain the lasting image of 2017, then that’s fine. The prospect of formulating and presenting an argument to the contrary is nauseating.
Of some interest, however — as a means to exercising the critical faculties, if nothing else — is the variety of criteria one might establish to arrive at a reasonable answer. For those who are concerned with certainty, perhaps this smacks of relativism and sounds awful. For those among us who are resigned to the fact that reality is a myth and truth a moving target, then it’s probably acceptable.
Below, I’ve attempted to summarize the various criteria one might employ to determine the face of this record home-run season. First, however, I’d like to present a list of four players who merit the distinction for one reason or another. Depending on one’s preferences, any of these four is the correct answer.
They are (in alphabetical order):
Those are the results, basically. The process by which on might arrive at those results is detailed below.
Read the rest of this entry »