2025 Top 100 Prospects

Editor’s Note: An updated version of the Top 100, which incorporates Eric’s spring looks through the end of March, is available to read here. As always, full scouting reports and tool grades for every ranked prospect can be found on The Board.

Below is my list of the top 100 prospects in baseball. The scouting summaries were compiled with information provided by available data and my own observations. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but I use that as a rule of thumb.

All of the prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.

And now, a few important things to keep in mind as you’re perusing the Top 100. You’ll note that prospects are ranked by number but also lie within tiers demarcated by their Future Value grades. The FV grade is more important than the ordinal ranking. For example, the gap between Sebastian Walcott (no. 4) and Quinn Mathews (no. 32) is 28 spots, and there’s a substantial difference in talent between them. The gap between Chase Petty (no. 42) and Cam Smith (no. 70), meanwhile, is also 28 numerical places, but the difference in talent is relatively small.

You’ll also notice that there is a Future Value outcome distribution graph for each prospect on the list. This is an attempt to graphically represent how likely each FV outcome is for each prospect. Before his departure for ESPN, Kiley McDaniel used the great work of our former colleague Craig Edwards to find the base rates for each FV tier of prospect (separately for hitters and pitchers), and the likelihood of each FV outcome. For example, based on Craig’s research, the average 60 FV hitter on a list becomes a perennial 5-WAR or better player over his six controlled years 26% of the time, while he has a 27% chance of accumulating, at most, a couple of WAR during his six controlled years. I started with those base rates for every player on this year’s list and then manually tweaked them depending on my more specific opinions about the player. For instance, Alfredo Duno and Caden Dana are both 55 FV prospects, but other than the fact that their last names are D(x)n(x), they are nothing alike. Duno is a toolshed athletic outlier with very little pro experience, while Dana is a stable, big league-ready workhorse. My hope is that the distribution graphs reflect these kinds of differences.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

You might have scrolled ahead and seen that Japanese phenom Roki Sasaki is my top-ranked prospect. Last year, we made the decision to stop ranking players like Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Jung Hoo Lee, who were deemed “foreign professionals” by the CBA based on their age and foreign pro league service time. Foreign professionals are unable to earn their team a compensatory draft pick under the Prospect Promotion Incentive program. In contrast, Sasaki had not yet met the foreign professional standards set forth in the CBA when he was posted; he signed a minor league contract as part of the 2025 international class and was subject to bonus pool restrictions. Should he win NL Rookie of the Year, or finish in the top three in Cy Young or MVP voting before he reaches arbitration, he will net the Dodgers a draft pick. He’s also younger than many prospects.

This year’s group of prospects is a little bit lighter than usual at the very top. There are several players who I expect to be consistent All-Stars (the 60 FV group), but not the usual prospect or two who looks like a future MVP candidate, though there are probably a couple of players analyzed here who will emerge as prospects of that caliber during the next 12 months (Walcott is the odds-on favorite for that) as they get closer to the big leagues. There are also fewer 55 FV prospects than usual, as that group tends to peter out around no. 50 or so; this year, the last 55 FV is Duno at no. 29. I feel like I’ve written a version of this each of the last couple of years, which might be because changes to the rookie eligibility rules post-2020 made it easier for prospects to graduate, as September roster days are now counted toward their active major league roster days limit.

There are a ton of catchers (16) on this year’s list, many of whom have special power for that position. I have more catchers on here than I do players at all the corner positions combined (14), though it’s likely that some of the guys currently listed here as catchers will end up playing first base or left field. I tend to value hitters who play up-the-middle positions, and pitchers who are close to the big leagues and have demonstrated durability across 100-plus innings of work, and I think that rings true more than usual on this year’s list.

For a further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, please read this and this. If you would like to read a book-length treatment on the subject, one is available here.

2025 Top 100 Prospects
Rk Name Team Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
1 Roki Sasaki LAD 23.2 R SP 2025 65
2 Roman Anthony BOS 20.8 AAA RF 2026 60
3 Dylan Crews WSN 23.0 MLB CF 2025 60
4 Sebastian Walcott TEX 18.9 AA SS 2027 60
5 Samuel Basallo BAL 20.5 AAA C 2026 60
6 Andrew Painter PHI 21.9 AA SP 2025 60
7 Kristian Campbell BOS 22.6 AAA 2B 2026 60
8 Dalton Rushing LAD 24.0 AAA C 2025 60
9 Jackson Jobe DET 22.5 MLB SP 2025 60
10 Carson Williams TBR 21.6 AAA SS 2026 60
11 Drake Baldwin ATL 23.9 AAA C 2025 55
12 Chase Dollander COL 23.3 AA SP 2026 55
13 Matt Shaw CHC 23.3 AAA 3B 2025 55
14 Jordan Lawlar ARI 22.6 MLB SS 2025 55
15 Aidan Miller PHI 20.7 AA SS 2026 55
16 Jasson Domínguez NYY 22.0 MLB LF 2025 55
17 Walker Jenkins MIN 20.0 AA LF 2026 55
18 Noah Schultz CHW 21.5 AA SP 2026 55
19 Jarlin Susana WSN 20.9 A+ SP 2026 55
20 Emmanuel Rodriguez MIN 22.0 AAA CF 2025 55
Rk Name Team Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
21 Ethan Salas SDP 18.7 AA C 2026 55
22 Hagen Smith CHW 21.5 A+ SP 2025 55
23 Bubba Chandler PIT 22.4 AAA SP 2025 55
24 Brandon Sproat NYM 24.4 AAA SP 2025 55
25 Caden Dana LAA 21.2 MLB SP 2025 55
26 Bryce Eldridge SFG 20.3 AAA 1B 2026 55
27 Jacob Misiorowski MIL 22.9 AAA SP 2026 55
28 Chase Burns CIN 22.1 R SP 2025 55
29 Alfredo Duno CIN 19.1 A C 2028 55
30 Adrian Del Castillo ARI 25.4 MLB C 2025 50
31 Nick Kurtz ATH 21.9 AA 1B 2026 50
32 Quinn Mathews STL 24.4 AAA SP 2025 50
33 Angel Genao CLE 20.7 A+ 2B 2027 50
34 Max Clark DET 20.2 A+ CF 2027 50
35 Alex Freeland LAD 23.5 AAA SS 2025 50
36 Travis Bazzana CLE 22.5 A+ 2B 2025 50
37 Leodalis De Vries SDP 18.4 A SS 2028 50
38 Jesus Made MIL 17.8 R 2B 2029 50
39 Alejandro Rosario TEX 23.1 A+ SP 2026 50
40 AJ Smith-Shawver ATL 22.2 MLB SP 2025 50
Rk Name Team Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
41 Colt Emerson SEA 19.6 A+ 3B 2027 50
42 Chase Petty CIN 21.9 AAA SP 2025 50
43 Agustin Ramirez MIA 23.4 AAA C 2025 50
44 Thayron Liranzo DET 21.6 A+ C 2027 50
45 Coby Mayo BAL 23.2 MLB 1B 2025 50
46 Kevin Alcántara CHC 22.6 MLB CF 2025 50
47 Jac Caglianone KCR 22.0 A+ RF 2026 50
48 Josue De Paula LAD 19.7 A+ LF 2027 50
49 Kyle Teel CHW 23.0 AAA C 2026 50
50 Josue Briceño DET 20.4 A C 2027 50
51 Rhett Lowder CIN 22.9 MLB SP 2025 50
52 Jacob Wilson ATH 22.9 MLB SS 2025 50
53 Cooper Ingle CLE 23.0 AA C 2027 50
54 Kevin McGonigle DET 20.5 A+ SS 2026 50
55 Chase DeLauter CLE 23.4 AAA RF 2025 50
56 Luke Keaschall MIN 22.5 AA CF 2027 50
57 Marcelo Mayer BOS 22.2 AA SS 2026 50
58 Colson Montgomery CHW 23.0 AAA SS 2025 50
59 Kumar Rocker TEX 25.2 MLB SP 2025 50
60 Braxton Ashcraft PIT 25.4 AAA SP 2025 50
Rk Name Team Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
61 Yoniel Curet TBR 22.3 AA SP 2025 50
62 Jett Williams NYM 21.3 AAA CF 2026 50
63 JJ Wetherholt STL 22.4 A SS 2026 50
64 Tink Hence STL 22.5 AA SP 2025 50
65 Will Warren NYY 25.7 MLB SP 2025 50
66 Jake Bloss TOR 23.7 MLB SP 2026 50
67 Parker Messick CLE 24.3 AA SP 2026 50
68 Carter Jensen KCR 21.6 AA C 2027 50
69 Joe Mack MIA 22.1 AA C 2026 50
70 Cam Smith HOU 22.0 AA 3B 2027 50
71 Chayce McDermott BAL 26.5 MLB SP 2025 50
72 Chandler Simpson TBR 24.2 AA CF 2025 50
73 Yilber Diaz ARI 24.5 MLB SP 2025 50
74 Moisés Chace PHI 21.7 AA SP 2025 50
75 Brody Hopkins TBR 23.1 A+ SP 2026 50
76 Cole Young SEA 21.6 AA SS 2025 50
77 Jimmy Crooks STL 23.6 AAA C 2026 50
78 Juan Brito CLE 23.4 AAA 2B 2025 50
79 Cade Horton CHC 23.5 AAA SP 2025 50
80 Troy Melton DET 24.2 AA SP 2026 50
Rk Name Team Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
81 Jefferson Rojas CHC 19.8 A+ SS 2027 50
82 Arjun Nimmala TOR 19.3 A SS 2028 50
83 Thomas White MIA 20.4 A+ SP 2027 50
84 Travis Sykora WSN 20.8 A SP 2027 50
85 Felnin Celesten SEA 19.4 R 2B 2029 50
86 Tre’ Morgan TBR 22.6 AA 1B 2026 50
87 Starlyn Caba MIA 19.2 A SS 2028 50
88 Welbyn Francisca CLE 18.8 A 2B 2029 50
89 Jedixson Paez BOS 21.1 A+ SP 2026 50
90 Edgar Quero CHW 21.9 AAA C 2025 50
91 Edgardo Henriquez LAD 22.6 MLB SIRP 2025 50
92 Tai Peete SEA 19.5 A CF 2028 50
93 George Klassen LAA 23.1 AA SP 2025 50
94 Grant Taylor CHW 22.7 A SP 2026 50
95 Carson Whisenhunt SFG 24.3 AAA SP 2025 50
96 Luis Morales ATH 22.4 A+ SP 2027 50
97 Noble Meyer MIA 20.1 A+ SP 2027 50
98 Xavier Isaac TBR 21.2 AA 1B 2026 50
99 Jeferson Quero MIL 22.4 AAA C 2025 50
100 Jonny Farmelo SEA 20.4 A CF 2028 50
Rk Name Team Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
101 River Ryan LAD 26.5 MLB SP 2026 50
102 Ricky Tiedemann TOR 22.5 AAA SP 2026 50
Reading Options
Detail Level
Data Only
TLDR
Full
Graphs Hidden
Position Filter

65 FV Prospects

1. Roki Sasaki, SP, LAD

Signed: International Signing Period, 2025 from Japan (LAD)
Age 23.2 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 203 Bat / Thr R / R FV 65
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Splitter Command Sits/Tops
55/70 55/60 80/80 40/45 95-98 / 101

Peak Sasaki has talent on par with the best overall prospects in baseball. It seems likely to shine through in a profound way at some point during his MLB tenure, but Sasaki’s injury history and 2024 downtick in stuff are notable.

Sasaki cemented a legacy while he was still in high school. There was a stretch when he was asked to throw nearly 500 pitches in an eight-day span, including a 12-inning complete game during which he also hit the game-winning two-run homer. He became the LeBron James of Japanese baseball in the process and was the first pick in the 2019 NPB draft, wielding much more arm strength than the typical top-of-the-class arm there, touching 101 mph and sitting around 97.

In 2021, Sasaki amassed a 1.98 ERA in 77 total innings across 15 starts split between the Eastern League (NPB’s minor league) and the Pacific League (their top league). The 2022 season was his first full slate in Japan’s big league and Sasaki was great, making 20 starts, pitching 129 innings, posting a 2.02 ERA and making international headlines by throwing 17 consecutive perfect innings in April. At one point, Sasaki retired 52 consecutive batters (the MLB record is Yusmeiro Petit‘s 47) during that stretch. Sasaki was having an even better 2023 — 85 IP, 39% K%, 5% BB%, 62% GB%, 1.88 ERA, 0.92 FIP — before he was shut down with an oblique tear in July, which cost him most of the rest of the season. He made three appearances at the very end of 2023 and his stuff was crisp as usual.

In 2024, however, it backed up pretty substantially, as did Sasaki’s overall performance. He hasn’t been healthy for an entire season yet and most of his relevant stats (his ability to generate whiffs with his fastball, avoid walks, and get groundballs) took a nosedive in 2024. Sasaki’s plus-plus, upper-80s splitter (which often has slider shape to his glove side and can easily be mistaken for it) is still easily his best pitch, and might be the nastiest splitter on the planet. When he’s operating at apex, Sasaki looks like a slam dunk, top-of-the-rotation talent, like one of the best handful of pitchers in baseball. He’s young and seems likely to return to peak form at some point, though his injury history and general volatility keep him from being a 70 FV player. After buzz late in 2023 and early in 2024 that he was poised to be posted after the 2024 season, Sasaki signed with the Dodgers as part of the 2025 international class and enters camp primed to slot into their big league rotation.

Expand arrow_drop_down

60 FV Prospects

2. Roman Anthony, RF, BOS

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2022 from Stoneman Douglas HS (FL) (BOS)
Age 20.8 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr L / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/45 70/80 55/70 55/50 50/60 60

Anthony is an explosive athlete with some of the best bat speed in the minors, and enough feel-to-hit to weaponize most of his prodigious raw power.

In high school, Anthony presented clubs with a risky but exciting combination of present raw power and long-term power projection, but he made a below-average rate of contact on the showcase circuit (71%) and, at his size, seemed likely to end up at a corner position on defense. It’s part of why he was in essence a late-first round pick (he went 79th overall, but his $2.5 million bonus was in line with the 30th overall pick) rather than an obvious top prospect.

In pro ball, Anthony’s swing has become looser, and more active and kinetic, as his hands build enormous momentum before they explode and break the sound barrier with some of the best bat speed in pro baseball. The whip and looseness of his hips and hands at his size is very special. These changes not only unlocked a new gear of raw power for Anthony, who is now a career .284/.398/.473 hitter in the minors, but they also seem to have made him more comfortable and adept at moving the barrel around the zone. He posted a 75% contact rate in 2024 as he dominated Double- and Triple-A at age 20. The adjustments have also made Anthony more adept at covering fastballs running up and away from him, which was an issue for him in high school and upon his entry into pro ball, though they’ve also caused him to concede some of his ability to scoop low pitches. His cut often has a downward path, which is part of why he averaged just nine degrees of launch in 2024, though that’s up from six degrees in 2023. Anthony’s strikeout rates have hovered in the 23-25% range the last couple of seasons (a little south of the big league average) in part because he’s a very patient (bordering on passive) hitter who runs a ton of deep counts. His 39% swing rate from 2024 would have been the fourth-lowest in the majors last year. Though his swing isn’t totally optimized to get to all of his raw power right now, Anthony has such ridiculous juice that he’s going to hit for power anyway. LIke Jarren Duran before him, Anthony’s feel for actualizing that power in big league games will probably take a little bit of time to reach its apex, but at peak, Anthony will be a middle-of-the-order monster posting huge power and on-base percentages.

Speaking of Duran, the presence of him and Ceddanne Rafaela on the roster would likely usher Anthony to an outfield corner most of the time regardless of whether or not Roman could actually play center field, but as Anthony has filled out and become more physical, he has begun to slow down enough to shift his defensive projection to a corner anyway — probably right field because of his terrific arm. Boston has a glut of outfielders at the big league level, with Anthony charging hard behind them. He might already be a better option than Masataka Yoshida, and Rafaela’s swing-happy approach makes him a volatile player. It’s plausible we’ll see Anthony be added to Boston’s roster in the middle of the year if they’re in the thick of it with the other good teams in their division. If the big league club is again toward the back of the pack, then it’s more likely Anthony exhausts rookie eligibility in 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

3. Dylan Crews, CF, WSN

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from LSU (WSN)
Age 23.0 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 203 Bat / Thr R / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/50 60/60 50/60 70/70 40/45 55

Crews has big power and speed, and altered his position in the batter’s box last year to better deal with fastballs around his hands.

Crews went wire-to-wire as one of the best 2023 draft prospects, if not the best. He was the top unsigned high schooler from the 2020 class, a toolshed who swung and missed on the summer showcase circuit more than teams felt comfortable with. He ended up at LSU rather than in pro ball, and from day one was among the toolsiest and most productive college hitters for three straight years. He slashed .380/.498/.689 and had more walks than strikeouts during his tenure at LSU. Crews’ first full pro season also went well. He slashed .270/.342/.451 split between Double-A Harrisburg and Triple-A Rochester, then was called up at the end of August to get his feet wet without exhausting rookie eligibility. His underlying data was much better than his surface-level stats during that stretch.

Crews can punish you to all fields. He’ll get extended on fastballs away from him and crush them the opposite way, and he can also turn on slower pitches on the middle two-thirds of the plate and hit some titanic blasts to left. His best swings feature unbelievable verve and explosion, with Crews’ lower body usage evoking Mike Trout. At times, the depth of Crews’ load will leave him late on fastballs. Early in 2024, he was really struggling with fastballs tailing in on his hands, but by the time he was in the big leagues at the end of the year, Crews had begun to move off the plate against righties (we won’t know how this impacts his plate coverage against sliders until we see more). He also cuts his stride with two strikes, but can still generate power because of how explosive the rest of his operation is. All of this is very similar to Jackson Chourio, and Crews will might need a similar adjustment period before he really takes off.

Some of the Chourio similarities extend to Crews’ defense. He can absolutely fly and will show you jailbreak-y, sub-4.1 run times. He easily has the speed to play center field, but his reads, routes, and ball skills aren’t great. His pure speed should enable him to remain in center field, but he’s probably going to underperform out there relative to his pure speed. The opposite is true on the bases, where Crews’ speed arguably plays up because of his feel and acumen. Even if he’s relegated to a corner due to the presence of superior on-roster options in center, he’s going to hit for enough power and make a big enough impact on the bases to be a star.

Expand arrow_drop_down

4. Sebastian Walcott, SS, TEX

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Bahamas (TEX)
Age 18.9 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/45 60/80 45/70 45/45 40/50 60

If you’re looking for the next Fernando Tatis Jr., this is your most likely candidate.

Walcott was seen some in the U.S. during the fall of 2021, and he leapt off the field because of his physicality and power. The Rangers international scouting group was originally connected to a player named Camilo Diaz for a rumored bonus of $3 million, but seemingly diverted to Walcott around this time (Diaz later signed with Houston). Walcott signed in January of 2023 and immediately stood apart from his peers on the backfields because of his size and bat speed. He went to the D.R. for the start of the 2023 DSL season, but was quickly promoted to Arizona and lit up the ACL up for a month (he was hondo’d at this time) before opponents realized he couldn’t recognize a breaking ball. He ended up having a .273/.325/.524 line in Arizona with terrifying peripherals, including a 6.4% walk rate and 32.5% strikeout rate. In 2024, the Rangers sent Walcott, who turned 18 during spring training, straight to High-A Hickory. Amazingly, he held his own there, slashing .261/.342/.443 with 10.6% walks (sigh of relief) and 25.5% strikeouts before earning a promotion to Double-A Frisco for the final week of the season.

As you are reading this Top 100 blurb, Walcott is still just 18 years old. He has immense physical ability, a cathedral ceiling, and the long-term athletic projection to be very good for a very long time. He looks like a future NFL wide receiver in his uniform and has elite hand speed in the batter’s box, which he generates with shockingly little effort for a hitter his age. There are some mechanical flaws and nits to pick with Walcott’s swing, but when you’re this talented, these tend not to matter. Walcott’s front side often opens up toward third base when he swings, leaving him very vulnerable to sliders away from him. His tendency to chase and miss against secondary stuff is still kind of scary, but his fastball swing decisions are very good, and overall, his baseline chase and two-strike chase were about the big league average in 2024. His bat path slopes down and tends to swat the baseball into the ground, unless Walcott is making contact way out in front of the plate, at which point those of you in the parking lot need to keep your head on a swivel. Despite his issues, Walcott is generating plus big league peak exit velos as a freaking 18-year-old, and just had a 125 wRC+ season in the mid-minors even though the paint on many aspects of his game is still wet. His stride direction might require eventual adjustment, but rather than intervene right now, I think it’s fine to see if Walcott’s timing and feel to hit come naturally once he’s challenged.

By the end of the season, Walcott had also leveled up on defense. He lacks the footspeed and twitch of most big league shortstops, but his ability to bend at his size is amazing, and Walcott’s short arm stroke (reminiscent of Manny Machado‘s) allows him to effortlessly send the baseball wherever it needs to go. His actions and exchange on slow rollers have also improved. By the end of the season, Walcott (who still has some accuracy hiccups) did not seem sped up or flustered by the speed of the game on defense like he had early in the season. Walcott’s ceiling as a power hitter is as big as any prospect in the minors, and of the players close to him, he pretty comfortably has the best chance at remaining at what is arguably the most valuable position in baseball. This guy is easily the odds on favorite to be the top prospect in baseball a year from now, and he’s a grade of breaking ball recognition away from being a 70 FV talent.

Expand arrow_drop_down

5. Samuel Basallo, C, BAL

Signed: International Signing Period, 2021 from Dominican Republic (BAL)
Age 20.5 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr L / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 70/80 55/70 40/40 30/45 60

Basallo has Gary Sánchez‘s skill set, except from the left side of the plate.

Basallo is a power-hitting kaiju catching prospect who looks like a gear-wearing Rafael Devers. His swing looks a lot like Devers’, and he too has plus-plus power projection, a penchant for expanding the zone, plus arm strength, and some profound defensive flaws. Basallo became one of baseball’s best prospects in 2023, as the then-18 year-old hit .313/.402/.551 with 53 extra-base hits in 114 games and smooched Double-A. A stress fracture in Basallo’s right elbow, which was discovered just before 2024 spring training, kept him from catching until May and limited his action behind the dish for the entire season. He caught in just 56 games all year and donned the tools of ignorance on consecutive days only eight times, while splitting his remaining games nearly equally between first base and DH. He hit .289/.355/.465 as a 19-year-old at Double-A Bowie, then was called up to Norfolk for the final month of play, but didn’t really hit.

The elbow issue may have had a temporary impact on Basallo’s game, especially his throwing, which was a plus-plus attribute in 2023 and more of an above-average one in 2024. Basallo was popping closer to 1.95 on average rather than being in the 1.8s like he was in 2023, and his footwork remains kind of sloppy and immature. As is true of a lot of catchers his age (let alone his size), Basallo could stand to be more accurate and consistent coming out of his crouch, but he easily has the raw arm strength to catch, and if his peak form returns, he’s just some technical polish away from being a run-stopping weapon. His receiving isn’t good yet, but it isn’t so terrible that it damns Basallo permanently to first base. His ball blocking might be though. It’s this area of Basallo’s game that most needs to improve, especially when it comes to backhanding balls in the dirt. His size and mobility (especially when he’s moving to his left) are commensurate with the traits of a primary catcher, but if Basallo were promoted tomorrow, he’d probably be a ball-blocking liability.

Though his offensive numbers have been incredible (he’s a career .286/.364/.477 hitter and has always been young for his level), Basallo has some growing to do at the plate as well. He’s very chase-prone, including much more often against fastballs than is typical, but Basallo already has ridiculous left-handed power at age 20 and is going to grow into more. Ludicrously listed at 180 pounds, he’s actually more like 250 and is built like a sophomore edge rusher. He’s an unbelievably explosive rotator for an athlete his size, and Basallo’s peak exit velocities are already one or two standard deviations better than the big league average, depending on the metric. The players who make a huge big league impact despite a ton of chase and a contact rate hovering around 70% (like Basallo’s) all have this kind of power, hitters like Salvador Perez, Teoscar Hernández, and Bryce Harper. Basallo’s power is absolutely going to be at the level of those guys and other sub-70% contact sluggers, and if he can refine his approach as he matures, he’s going to become one of the best hitting catchers in baseball in his prime.

Basallo’s chalk 40-man platform year is 2025. He’s been promoted ahead of that pace so far, but it’s pretty rare for catchers with his particular issues to be in the express lane to the big leagues. If the Orioles just want access to Basallo’s bat and decide to fast track him as a DH, or proactively move him to first base knowing Adley Rutschman is in place as the franchise catcher for a while, then a late-2025 debut feels possible. If the Orioles want to give Basallo the best chance of having immediate success as a big league catcher, then he’s more likely on a late-2026 or spring 2027 trajectory. There are few other prospects in the minors who have this kind of offensive ceiling and a chance to play a premium position.

Expand arrow_drop_down

6. Andrew Painter, SP, PHI

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Calvary Christian HS (PHI)
Age 21.9 Height 6′ 7″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr R / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/70 55/60 55/60 40/50 50/60 96-98 / 100

Painter looked fine upon his return from TJ and was his usual 96-100 with great breaking stuff. As soon as he shows his stamina and command have also returned, he’ll be an impact big league starter.

Painter ended 2022 as one of the best two or three pitching prospects in baseball. He overpowered hitters with his fastball at the lower levels of the minors, but by the end of the year, he was carving up Double-A and looked like a fully-formed, four-pitch monster. He entered the spring of 2023 with a legitimate shot to break camp in the Phillies rotation, like a pitching version of Fernando Tatis Jr. from a few years earlier. Instead, Painter’s elbow barked and he was shut down with a partial UCL tear after his first Grapefruit League outing. Painter and the Phillies, who rightly believed they’d be contenders, opted for a plasma-rich platelet injection rather than immediate surgery, in the hopes that the right-hander would be able to pitch at the end of the season and possibly into October. But Painter’s elbow didn’t heal completely from the PRP and rest, and he needed Tommy John toward the end of July. The timing of the surgery meant his rehab lasted through the entire 2024 regular season, in essence costing Painter two whole years. He was sent to the Arizona Fall League, where he again looked excellent. In six outings, Painter pitched 15.2 innings, struck out 18, and allowed 14 baserunners, usually sitting 94-98 while touching 100 and flashing the same plus slider and curveball combo that made him lethal in 2022.

Good luck getting on top of Painter’s fastball when he locates it at the top of the zone. Even though he’s so big and his pitches travel downhill toward the imaginary rectangle, it has still been hard for hitters to snatch his high fastballs, similar to the way Justin Verlander‘s fastball plays despite his size and release height. Both of Painter’s breaking balls have huge movement but are still a bit of a work-in-progress in terms of their usage. Painter is much more comfortable locating his breaking balls in the zone rather than as chase pitches. His slider has two-plane sweep and tended to be in the 86-90 mph range in Arizona, while his curveball is more north/south and sits 82-85 mph. Perfecting his slider locations is one key to Painter maxing out; the other is finding a weapon to thwart lefties. He can pitch backwards off his curveball and finish them with high fastballs, but Painter would do well to either find more consistent curveball finish below the zone, or a better changeup, to do so. He began incorporating more changeups into his mix later in his AFL run. The pitch was 7% of Painter’s usage late in 2022 after he had been promoted to Reading, and he will show you a really good one every fourth try or so. He’s loose enough to project this pitch as being a fourth above-average weapon down the line.

Phillies POBO Dave Dombrowski told reporters in December that Painter’s 2025 season will start on a delay. In order to backload his innings for the middle and end of the season, he’s on track to pitch in competitive games “July-ish.” Independent of his initial innings cap, Painter is one of the best pitching prospects in baseball. He extends the shelf life of an already stacked Phillies rotation deep into the future.

Expand arrow_drop_down

7. Kristian Campbell, 2B, BOS

Drafted: 4th Round, 2023 from Georgia Tech (BOS)
Age 22.6 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 203 Bat / Thr R / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 55/60 45/60 60/60 30/40 40

Campbell was a speedy contact hitter in college whose drastic change in approach has unlocked a ton of power in pro ball. He is still searching for a defensive home.

At Georgia Tech, Campbell was an outstanding slash-and-dash leadoff man who was among the most difficult Division-I hitters to make swing and miss during the 2023 season. He hit .376/.484/.549 and struck out just 17 times in 217 PA during his draft year as an age-eligible redshirt freshman. The Red Sox have essentially made him into a Jarren Duran sequel, taking another speedy, contact-oriented second baseman and making subtle changes to his swing and approach, resulting in a seismic shift to his offensive output, which now includes big power. Campbell posted a .997 OPS in his first full pro season and raced from High- to Triple-A by the end of the year.

Campbell is now swinging with damage-seeking intent and has been able to lift the ball more (three degrees of launch in 2023, nine degrees in 2024). The power he’s generating with his new style is shocking. His high-end exit velocities are now comfortably plus on the big league scale (he hit a ball 114 mph last year), and he’s doing huge damage to all fields.

These changes have come at the expense of some of Campbell’s ability to make contact (he had a 90% contact rate in college, 81% in pro ball 2023, and 78% in 2024), but not so much that he’s totally out of control and at risk of not hitting. His cut still looks weird, like it did in college, when he was often chopping down at the baseball. But no matter how you slice up Campbell’s performance, statistically or visually, there isn’t a pitch type, location, or velocity threshold where you really encounter a red flag. This weirdo swing works for Campbell even though it’s unconventional, and he’s now proven it across 340 upper-level plate appearances. He crushes mistakes in the middle of the plate and squibs hard-hit contact around the diamond on pitches closer to the edges of the zone. And unlike a lot of the powerless college bat-control mavens who go on Day Two of the draft, Campbell isn’t undersized or unathletic; he’s a strapping 6-foot-3 guy with explosive rotational athleticism. This isn’t a skills-over-tools type who fails to check the physical scouting boxes; this is a projectable athlete who has only played high-level baseball for two seasons.

The early part of the 2025 season needs to be about Campbell finding a viable defensive position. He played second base at Tech, then mixed in a lot of center field during the first half of 2024 before that experiment took a back seat to reps at shortstop during the second half. Campbell is a plus runner who has the wheels for center, but his feel for the position (especially coming in on balls in front of him) is very raw. His athleticism bailed him out of some bad reads last year; Campbell would get twisted around out there and still find a crazy way to make the play, which was pretty exciting given the context of his development. The Red Sox already have lots of good upper-level outfield options, though, so while continued experimentation in the outfield might have been more worthwhile for other orgs, his best chance at cracking Boston’s lineup soon is on the infield. Campbell is at his best when he is moving from right to left while making the play. He doesn’t have the pure arm strength to play shortstop, but the Red Sox were positioning him deep in the hole so that he could make most of his throws with his whole body’s momentum moving toward first base. If Campbell is asked to make throws from any kind of odd platform, his strength and accuracy waiver, and this includes when he’s playing second base. His arm accuracy issues might always mean he’s a bit of a sketchy option on defense even though other aspects of his game (range, hands) are fine. Where Campbell plays at the big league level on any given day could be dictated by where the ball is least likely to be hit based on the matchup, and he might continue to rove. He’s going to be a unique impact player, both in terms of his style and roster fit.

Expand arrow_drop_down

8. Dalton Rushing, C, LAD

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2022 from Louisville (LAD)
Age 24.0 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 55/55 50/55 45/45 40/45 70

Rushing has developed into a good defensive catcher and well-rounded offensive threat. He may force the Dodgers to find a way to roster both him and Will Smith at the same time.

Hidden under the Henry Davis bushel at Louisville, Rushing finally got regular reps in 2022 and played himself into the draft’s first day. He was a bat-first prospect whose defensive issues (ball blocking, throwing accuracy, a general lack of polish as a receiver) seem to have been due to a lack of playing time rather than a lack of talent, as Rushing has improved fairly quickly in a lot of these areas whilst raking his way to Triple-A. He’s a career .273/.410/.520 hitter as a pro and is approaching the big leagues so quickly that it might force the Dodgers to roster him and Will Smith simultaneously, a possibility that has led to experimentation with Rushing at first base (2023) and in left field (2024). Rushing’s plus-plus arm (he absolutely launches out of his crouch and routinely pops below 1.9 seconds) would be kind of a waste at either position. Rushing’s throwing accuracy can still be a tad wayward and he remains a below-average receiver and pitch framer, but he’s gotten much better at picking balls in the dirt, and he’s started to backpick runners at first when he has the opportunity. There’s still work to be done here, and Rushing’s framing around the edge of the zone really pulls down his overall defensive ability right now, but his arm and the rate of his progress in other areas is very exciting.

On offense, Rushing’s muscular physique generates above-average raw power and his swing is tailored to get to it. In fact, he’s so geared to launch that Rushing might outproduce his raw power in games. It’s enough offense that it doesn’t really matter what position Rushing plays; he’s going to hit enough to profile. If he can keep improving as a defender, he’ll be a multi-time All-Star.

Expand arrow_drop_down

9. Jackson Jobe, SP, DET

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Heritage Hall HS (DET)
Age 22.5 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr R / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/55 55/60 55/55 50/60 94-98 / 99

After a rough pro debut, Jobe altered the makeup of his secondary stuff and has been tracking as one of the best pitching prospects in baseball for the last couple of years.

Jobe was the consensus top high school arm in the 2021 draft and earned a bonus of nearly $7 million as the third overall pick. He had a somewhat rocky first full season in pro ball and his velocity was down a bit compared to his peak pre-draft look. Hitters seemed unphased by Jobe’s trademark curveball despite its elite spin and huge depth. He struggled to throw strikes and the visual quality of his stuff regressed. Then Jobe was put on the IL to start 2023 and missed two and a half months recovering from lumbar spine inflammation. When Jobe returned in mid-June, he did so with a vengeance; he tallied 103 strikeouts and just 11 walks in 79.2 IP (including his Fall League stint), and his fastball often touched 98-99. The first half of Jobe’s 2024 season was interrupted by a hamstring strain, but he returned in June and by the end of July had stretched back out to six inning per start while holding his peak stuff. He debuted in Detroit’s bullpen late in the season.

Jobe scrapped his curveball in 2023 (more on that in a second) and now utilizes a firm 87-92 mph cutter and a low-80s sweeper (averaging 3,000 rpm), while also having upped his changeup usage considerably. Neither of Jobe’s new breaking balls has consistent quality of finish just yet; both are a little better than average. His changeup is arguably his nastiest secondary now, as Jobe uses it against both lefties and righties. The changes he’s made in response to the ineffectiveness of his 2022 breaking ball have made Jobe a more complete pitcher. A few days before Top 100 publication, the Detroit Free Press reported that Jobe was going to reintegrate a curveball and add a sinker to his repertoire in 2025.

Will we see this kind of velocity from Jobe across 120-140 innings? We didn’t quite get to know the answer to the workload question in 2024 because of his IL stint, but at the end of the season he looked healthy, nasty, and, from a craftsmanship standpoint, fairly ready to pitch in the big leagues. He is arguably the top pitching prospect in baseball behind Sasaki if you value Jobe’s proximity and stability relative to Andrew Painter.

Expand arrow_drop_down

10. Carson Williams, SS, TBR

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Torrey Pines HS (TBR)
Age 21.6 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 180 Bat / Thr R / R FV 60
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/35 55/60 40/55 55/55 60/70 70

A future Gold Glove shortstop, Williams also has plus power, but struggles to hit breaking balls.

Williams was a two-way high school player who was talented enough to be considered a prospect as both a shortstop and a pitcher. The Rays gave him a $2.3 million bonus to keep him from heading to Cal, and have developed him solely as a hitter. During the last three years, Williams has become one of the better prospects in all of baseball, averaging 20 annual homers as a young-for-the-level player who also plays Gold Glove-caliber defense at shortstop.

In 2024, Williams slashed .256/.352/.469 with 20 bombs and 33 steals in 44 attempts at Double-A Montgomery. That’s not to say that Williams is a lock to hit. He’s struck out more than 30% of the time so far in pro ball, and he has severe issues contacting breaking balls. The 65-68% contact rates he’s posted the last couple of years are scraping the bottom of the big league barrel at shortstop. The players in that area who tend to succeed (a select few: Elly De La Cruz, Oneil Cruz, Ezequiel Tovar) do so because they have enormous tools, and thankfully so does Williams, who is still a fairly skinny 21-year-old and already generating above-average big league power with the flick of his wrists. That and his premium defensive ability are the two attributes that support Williams’ entire profile.

Williams is an unbelievable athlete and flashy shortstop defender who is as creative as he is talented. His range, body control, and plus-plus throwing arm make many tough plays look routine, and make some seemingly impossible plays possible. This defensive ability gives Williams a very high floor. The bummer version of Williams looks something like Adalberto Mondesi, while the version who polishes his hit tool enough for Williams to be a consistent All-Star looks more like Willy Adames.

Expand arrow_drop_down

55 FV Prospects

11. Drake Baldwin, C, ATL

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2022 from Missouri State (ATL)
Age 23.9 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr L / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/55 55/55 45/55 30/30 40/45 55

Baldwin is a stocky, physical catcher with impressive opposite field power and feel to hit. He projects as an above-average regular.

Baldwin signed for just south of $650,000 as the Braves’ third rounder in 2022. He slashed .318/.426/.549 throughout his college career in Springfield, had as many walks as strikeouts, and posted a 51% hard-hit rate (Missouri State plays in the same stadium as the Cardinals’ Double-A team, so it’s fitted with all the tech) in a pretty sizable sample as a junior. As a pro, Baldwin has coasted through the minors, posting a comfortably above-average wRC+ at every level, except for the very start of 2024 at Double-A, where he had some tough BABIP luck.

Baldwin’s ability to move his hands around the zone and spray well-struck contact to all fields is commensurate with an impact primary catcher. He’s thick and physical, rotates with ferocity, and yet his short levers keep his swing from getting too long. He again posted a hard-hit rate up around 50% in 2024, though Baldwin almost exclusively inside-outs fastballs the other way and big league pitchers might be able to limit his game power by attacking him with velocity on the outer third. Though a bunch of his TrackMan data is very similar to Dodgers catcher Dalton Rushing, Baldwin’s power is not as well-actualized, and stylistically, he looks more like an all-fields doubles hitter. He does a little bit of everything at a position where one thing is often enough.

Baldwin has made impressive developmental progress on defense. The Braves drastically altered some stylistic elements of his receiving, most notably paring down Baldwin’s footwork and putting him more regularly on one knee, and it has taken him some time to get comfortable with that. His receiving and ball blocking are only fair, while the quickness and consistency of his exchange on throws to second base has become excellent. What he lacks in height relative to most catchers, he makes up for in bodily density. He’s of sturdy build and caught close to 100 games in 2024 when you take his AFL and Premier12 postseason activity into account. Though he’s not currently on the 40-man roster, Baldwin is in position for a 2025 debut, and given Sean Murphy‘s injury track record, it’s possible he’ll get some extended run.

Expand arrow_drop_down

12. Chase Dollander, SP, COL

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Tennessee (COL)
Age 23.3 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 192 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/55 50/50 45/55 45/60 94-97 / 99

Dollander does everything well (fastball velo, fastball traits, fastball command, breaking ball quality, changeup projection) and looks like an impact mid-rotation starter who should move through the minors pretty quickly.

Dollander sat 93-95 mph as a freshman at Georgia Southern, then started throwing harder as a sophomore after he transferred to Tennessee. Throughout 2022 and 2023, he sat 94-97 with riding life and would frequently top out in the 98-99 mph range. In 2024, he sustained that across 23 starts, 118 innings, with the last two months of the season spent at Double-A Hartford.

Dollander does (or projects to do) everything well. He has plus fastball velocity, as well as the angle/movement traits you want in a power pitcher’s bat-missing heater. He also has a plus-flashing breaking ball in his upper-80s slider, a pitch that wasn’t turning the corner as consistently late in 2024, but was dominant early in the year. He can take a little off and show hitters a vertical curveball, too, and both breaking balls have distinct movement. Dollander’s changeup is improving despite limited usage. The pacing of his delivery, which has huge acceleration at the very end, should help mask his changeup, which has plenty of action and a chance to be yet another bat-missing pitch for him at peak. Dollander’s secondary pitches were dominant during the first half, but weren’t as impressive after the All-Star break. By the end of the season, his chase and miss rates were pretty average for his secondaries across the board, but remained outstanding for his fastball.

A strapping 6-foot-2, Dollander has the frame and delivery of a 160-plus inning workhorse. His line to the plate can waver at times, but for the most part his delivery and release are consistent, and Dollander’s fastball is nasty enough to give him lots of margin for error on the days when his command is a little looser. He’s going to be an impact mid-rotation guy — and maybe the Rockies’ best starter — very soon.

Expand arrow_drop_down

13. Matt Shaw, 3B, CHC

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Maryland (CHC)
Age 23.3 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 185 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 60/60 45/60 60/60 45/55 45

A fair bit of slider chase adds some volatility to Shaw’s offensive forecast but, especially with a much more stable and enthusiastic understanding of his defense, he’s tracking like an above-average everyday player and foundational young talent.

Shaw is among the twitchiest, most fun to watch players in the minors. A 5-foot-9 stick of dynamite who plays with all-out effort, he has blazed through the minors with relative ease, reaching Triple-A toward the end of his first full pro season. Combined between Double-A Tennessee and Triple-A Iowa, Shaw slashed .284/.379/.488 with 44 extra-base hits (21 of them homers) and 31 steals in 42 attempts, then he was the best hitter on Team USA’s Premier12 roster in the fall.

Perhaps most importantly, the 2024 season gave us growing clarity around Shaw’s defensive fit and ability. Shaw exclusively played the middle infield as an amateur, but as a pro, he has begun seeing reps at third base. Shaw sometimes struggles with throwing accuracy and he lacks laser-like arm strength from deep in the hole, but he is otherwise growing into a tremendous third base defender. His lightning-quick exchange helps him shamelessly throw two- and three-hoppers to first base on those deeper throws, his range is exceptional, and he’s capable of some very acrobatic stuff. Especially if his feel for throwing from third continues to improve, his ceiling as a defender there is very high. Shaw has also continued to play some shortstop and second base. Dansby Swanson and Nico Hoerner are entrenched on the Cubs’ middle infield right now, but the departure of Isaac Paredes in the Kyle Tucker trade clears the runway for Shaw to seize the Opening Day job at third, though he may have to beat out Rule 5 pick Gage Workman during spring training.

Shaw is also an enormously entertaining hitter. He swings like a turbo-charged Sal Bando — closed stance, closed stride, with hands that load very low — except with a huge leg kick, one that is so big and elaborate that it’s often hard for him to time. He gets beaten by fastballs up around the belt fairly often, in part because of the path his hands take as a result of his low load, but mostly because his front foot is often late getting down. When he’s on time, Shaw is capable of doing all-fields damage, not only because of the explosion created by his whole-body swing, but because of how quick and powerful his wrists are. There are times when the finish to Shaw’s swing is abbreviated, à la Chase Utley, but he still smacks the crap out of the ball. That said, opposing pitchers can neuter his power by executing down-and-away from him, where his bat path ends up driving the baseball into the ground; this is why Shaw’s game power is graded below his raw. A fair bit of slider chase adds some volatility to Shaw’s offensive forecast, but especially with a much more stable and enthusiastic understanding of his defense, he’s tracking like an above-average everyday player and foundational young talent.

Expand arrow_drop_down

14. Jordan Lawlar, SS, ARI

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Jesuit Prep HS (ARI)
Age 22.6 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/40 50/60 45/55 70/70 55/60 60

Lawlar is a powerful athlete and slick shortstop defender with imprecise feel for contact.

Lawlar has been beset by injuries basically since he was drafted. He needed surgery to repair a torn labrum in his shoulder almost immediately after he drove his pro career off the lot, then was sidelined by discomfort caused by a bone growth on one of his ribs in mid-2022, before suffering a fractured left scapula when he was hit by a pitch later that season. Lawlar had a healthy 2023 and cracked the big league roster for the first time, but he didn’t hit enough to usurp Evan Longoria during the Snakes’ postseason run. He then tore a ligament in his right thumb during 2024 spring training, had surgery, and dealt with recurring hamstring issues a couple of times after he returned. He played just 14 games at an affiliate and was sent to play for Licey in the Dominican Winter League until around Thanksgiving, doubling his 2024 plate appearances to just over 200 total.

Lawlar has a below-average hit tool but does everything else well. He’s an acrobatic defender who finds all kinds of crazy ways to contort his body and send the baseball where it has to go, which is especially evident on his feeds to second. Lawlar is often positioned so he can make plays moving right to left, which he’s most comfortable with. He struggles to make accurate throws off the backhand, so putting him in position to make as few of those as possible makes a lot of sense. Lawlar got some third base reps with Licey and did fine, putting him on the depth chart at both spots on the infield’s left side.

On offense, Lawlar hit for power when he was healthy at Double-A in 2023, but his exit velocities are shockingly low (and have been for multiple years) given his pedigree and look during BP. He doesn’t have great feel for the barrel, and this may be a contact quality issue rather than an actual lack of raw power. His FV grade slid as I worked on the Top 100 as a whole, and got a 10,000 foot view of the entire player population. He’s on time to pull lefties with power, and shows gap-to-gap spray against righties. He has plus bat speed, but requires a ton of effort to generate it, often so much that he stops tracking the ball. It’s possible that the considerable amount of time Lawlar has missed means that his hit tool will develop late, and that he’ll improve enough in this regard to produce offense like Trevor Story or Willy Adames did during their years of team control. At least initially though, his offensive output might look more like like that of Danny Espinosa and Paul DeJong.

Expand arrow_drop_down

15. Aidan Miller, SS, PHI

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from JW Mitchell HS (FL) (PHI)
Age 20.7 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 50/60 45/60 55/55 30/40 45

Miller is a power-hitting left side infielder who swings like Nico Hoerner, except with more power.

Miller had a monster first full season, as he slashed .261/.366/.446 across both A-ball levels and got a shot of espresso at Reading to cap the year. Pre-draft fretting over Miller’s age relative to his high school peers has evaporated with the pace of his promotion. His explosive hands have lovely lift out in front of the plate, and he adjusts them nicely to breaking stuff. Miller can still roast ’em even when his weight shifts early and his hands are responsible for doing all the damage. Because his hands fire late and take a path that creates scoop and lift, Miller will probably always be vulnerable to fastballs running up around his hands. But he’s so dangerous throughout the rest of the zone that his production isn’t likely to bottom out because of this issue.

Defensively, the Phillies have only ever deployed Miller at shortstop. His exchange is a little slow when operating around the bag, and Miller lacks the prototypical, from-the-hole arm strength of a good shortstop, but that’s also true of Trea Turner. Miller tends to start deeper toward the hole so he can make the lion’s share of his plays moving right to left as a way of masking this issue. It isn’t ideal, and I had Miller projected to third base both when he was an amateur and last list cycle, but based on how the Phillies have operated, I have him projected as a below-average shortstop now. Be he a passable shortstop or an average third baseman, Miller’s bat is going to enable him to be a damn good everyday player and maybe make a couple All-Star teams. He has a shot to kick down the door and debut in mid-to-late 2025.

Expand arrow_drop_down

16. Jasson Domínguez, LF, NYY

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2019 from Dominican Republic (NYY)
Age 22.0 Height 5′ 9″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr S / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/45 60/60 55/60 55/55 40/45 55

The Zion Williamson of baseball, Domínguez is a bulked-up, switch-hitting toolshed.

Domínguez has played a little bit in the big leagues each of the last two seasons, but a late-2023 Tommy John surgery kept him out for most of 2024 and is why he hasn’t yet lost rookie status. Often described on this website as “Baseball’s Zion Williamson,” Domínguez signed for $5.1 million in 2019 as easily the toolsiest player in his signing class, a plus-running center fielder with huge switch-hitting power. He resembled Zion in both a hype and bodily sense. Domínguez had very mature physicality at a young age. It was and is where his prodigious tools come from, but he was so muscular so young that it was tough to predict what kind of mobility he’d have as he aged into his 20s. He’s built like the kind of tightly wound athlete you see grabbing at their hamstring at least once a year. To this point, though, he has been able to keep things in check and remain explosive and mobile, especially in his hips. He’s a career .274/.373/.444 hitter in the minors and is poised to assume the playing time left vacant by Juan Soto‘s crosstown departure.

Domínguez is going to hit for power. Though he struggled with strikeout issues as a young-for-the-level player while he rocketed through the minors, Domínguez’s lefty barrel control was better in 2024 upon his return from TJ, and his contact metrics hovered around average. He’s looking to pull from the left side of the dish, while he’s a bit more opposite-field oriented from the right side. A shorter-levered guy, Domínguez can wait an extra beat to identify breaking balls, and he crushes the mistakes he sees.

Where he needs to improve is on defense. Perhaps because he’s missed extended time due to injury, Domínguez has sketchy feel for his position. His reads and routes can be wayward, and he looks uncomfortable at the catch point. He runs pretty well, but not well enough to play center field without good instincts and feel. The week of list publication, Yankees manager Aaron Boone told reporters that Cody Bellinger and Aaron Judge will likely push Domínguez to left field, which is probably the best fit for him in a vacuum anyway. A more optimistic contact projection than a year ago outweighs what is lost from Domínguez looking like flub-prone defender, and he should be an above-average everyday outfielder and young, build-around bat.

Expand arrow_drop_down

17. Walker Jenkins, LF, MIN

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from South Brunswick HS (NC) (MIN)
Age 20.0 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr L / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/60 45/55 40/55 45/40 30/50 40

Jenkins is a great contact-hitting corner outfield prospect.

The fifth pick in the 2023 draft, Jenkins crushed pro ball after signing to the tune of a .362/.417/.571 line, with a 90% z-contact rate during that span. His 2024 regular season got off to a delayed start due to a hamstring strain, which Jenkins suffered in his first game at Fort Myers. He rehabbed on the complex in May, then got 150-ish PA at both Low-A Fort Myers and High-A Cedar Rapids, before ending with a six-game sip of Double-A Wichita. He slashed .282/.394/.439 with just six homers, but 22 doubles and 17 steals in 20 attempts.

The way Jenkins’ hands operate is evocative of Jesse Winker; he has exciting feel to hit and barrel control. He tracks pitches exceptionally well and can move his hands all over the strike zone, snatching fastballs up around his hands to his pull side, or spraying up-and-away fastballs to left field in the air. Jenkins posted an excellent 88% in-zone contact rate and 83% overall contact rate in 2024, backing up his fantastic 2023 debut metrics. There are instances when Jenkins will take what he’s offered and make weak groundball contact rather than wait for something he can drive, but he’s a very promising young hitter in basically every other way. Though Jenkins lacks big raw power right now, his 6-foot-3 frame has room for muscle and strength, and he should have above-average pop at maturity. The Twins have been deploying Jenkins in center field (when he’s not DH’ing, which is frequent), but realistically, he’s a left fielder with a 40 arm. He should hit enough to be a heart-of-the-order hitter and impact regular regardless of his position.

Expand arrow_drop_down

18. Noah Schultz, SP, CHW

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from Oswego East HS (IL) (CHW)
Age 21.5 Height 6′ 9″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / L FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
50/55 70/80 30/40 30/40 45/55 94-97 / 99

On the one hand, it’s incredible that Schultz has been able to dominate the mid-minors with one good pitch (his fastball plays down relative to its raw velocity). On the other hand, it’s imperative that his other offerings get better for him to hit his ceiling.

On the one hand, it’s incredible that Schultz has been able to dominate the mid-minors with one great pitch. On the other hand, it’s imperative that his other offerings get better if he’s going to hit his ceiling. Schultz is the Oneil Cruz of pitching, so to speak. He has XXL size and a couple premium characteristics, some of which play down in games. He has one of the best sliders in the minors, a 2,900 rpm, 82-85 mph bender from hell with 10-to-4 shape. Schultz should also theoretically be able to run his fastball up the ladder to garner whiffs, because even though he’s built like an Andean Condor at a lanky 6-foot-9, his low arm slot gives him a release height of just five-and-a-half feet. But Schultz’s fastball, which sits comfortably in the mid-90s, barely ever misses bats; his heater surrendered an 89% zone contact rate in 2024. He also works with a cutter and a changeup, neither of which is good right now. Again, despite these truths, Schultz ran a 2.24 ERA at High- and Double-A last year at age 20. He’s freaky and performing, and yet he might just be scratching the surface of his potential. If Schultz can improve the effectiveness of any of his non-slider pitches in 2025, he might be the top pitching prospect in baseball a year from now.

Expand arrow_drop_down

19. Jarlin Susana, SP, WSN

Signed: International Signing Period, 2022 from Dominican Republic (SDP)
Age 20.9 Height 6′ 6″ Weight 235 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/65 70/80 30/45 30/45 96-99 / 103

Susana has one of the planet’s nastiest sliders and touches 102.

While he was still an amateur, Susana had a very, very late velocity spike and progressed from throwing in the mid-80s to the mid-90s in a very short period of time. Because he popped up late relative to his peers, most of the pool money when he was first eligible to sign had already been committed, and he opted to wait a year so that more teams could pursue him with a meaningful bonus. The Padres signed him for $1.7 million and pushed him to camp in Arizona during 2022 minor league spring training. Susana had only pitched in eight official games on the complex before the Padres traded him to Washington as part of the Juan Soto deal. After a walk-prone 2023 (40 free passes in 63 innings) and a rough start to his 2024, Susana appeared to turn a corner in June. He had five dominant starts in a row, was promoted to High-A Wilmington, and then only had two starts the rest of the year in which he walked more than two batters. Susana ended up working 103.2 innings (40 more than the prior season), struck out 35.4% of his opponents, and generated groundballs at a whopping 60% clip.

It’s easy to point to Susana’s velocity (which he held basically all year) as an impact attribute, but it’s his slider that’s easily his best pitch. There are times when it has cutter-movement, but it has eye-crossing downward bend at its best, in the Brad Lidge slider mold, except as hard as 92 mph. It’s a slam dunk 80-grade pitch that generated misses just over 50% of the time in 2024. Susana’s fastball will touch triple-digits, which is enough for it to dominant A-ball hitters. It lacks great movement or tough angle, and its performance will probably keel off a bit as Susana faces upper-level hitters. He barely used his changeup last year; it’s currently a glorified two-seamer in the 92-94 mph range. One out of every 10 or so of Susana’s changeups is any good, but he often casts it and it sails on him; the ones that flash have enough tailing action to miss bats. His slider has enough utility as a strike-stealer and finisher against lefties that he might not ever need a changeup, but some kind of splinker/splitter thing might emerge down the line, as tends to be the case for lots of the pitchers today who have lower arm slots like Susana. Now that Susana has began to check the “durability” and “control” boxes, seemingly at the same time, he’s one of the most exciting pitching prospects in baseball. He’s a 6-foot-6 Leviathan on track to gobble up NL East hitters in 2027.

Expand arrow_drop_down

20. Emmanuel Rodriguez, CF, MIN

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2019 from Dominican Republic (MIN)
Age 22.0 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr L / L FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/30 70/70 50/60 50/50 60/60 60

Rodriguez is a fun, weird prospect who plays flashy center field defense and hits for power. He’s going to walk and strike out a ton.

Rodriguez is one of the more entertaining and fascinating prospects in the minors, an incredibly slick defensive center fielder who has plus power and plate discipline. He also has barely played. What would have been Rodriguez’s first pro season was squashed by the pandemic and his next two were shortened by knee and abdominal injuries, limiting him to just 84 combined games in his first three years as a pro. A thumb sprain sidelined him for much of 2024 and required surgery in September.

When healthy, Rodriguez has posted huge stats; he’s a .250/.422/.510 hitter in 230 career games. His underlying TrackMan data corroborates the power and OBP aspects of that output. I thought I’d have to go back and use Rodriguez’s 2023 data to illustrate this because of his thumb injury, but I don’t. Even with a bum digit, he had a 56% hard-hit rate in 2024, and hit a ball 114 mph. He’s only chased 10-14% of the time the last two seasons. This is like a turbo-charged version of Trent Grisham, with louder all-fields power but similar patience and defensive ability.

I can’t wait for the MLB.TV surfers among you to see this guy play defense. He isn’t an elite speedster with huge range; instead, he has incredible skill at the catch point. He makes spectacular plays around the wall and while going to the ground. His reads, routes, instincts and ball skills in center are all spectacular, and right now, he has the foot speed to play there. “Right now” is key, however, and this is where Rodriguez’s profile takes a bit of a turn and becomes more difficult to wrangle. Almost 22 years old, Rodriguez is already a stocky 5-foot-11, 215 pounds or so. He glides around the outfield with ease at present, but whether that will still be true even three or five years down the line isn’t certain because his body is already maxed out.

The other potential issue here (and this is where his profile also kind of aligns with Grisham’s) is that Rodriguez has a well-defined hole in his swing up and away from him; his swing is bottom-hand dominant in the extreme and causes him to swing underneath these pitches with concerning regularity. Rodriguez’s compact body helps keep his swing short enough to be on time in the rest of the zone, and his tremendous plate discipline assures that he only hunts pitches he can drive early in counts. Rodriguez’s defense will give his offensive flaws room to breath during the periods when he is going through contact dry spells, and across an entire season (assuming Rodriguez will eventually be healthy for one), he should produce like an above-average center fielder.

Expand arrow_drop_down

21. Ethan Salas, C, SDP

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Venezuela (SDP)
Age 18.7 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr L / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/40 45/60 30/55 50/40 45/70 60

Salas is a mature, well-rounded catching prospect who projects as a plus-plus defender. He is very likely to add substantial power as he matures, but his swing is kind of weird, so he might not tap into all of it in games.

Among the most high-profile international amateur prospects of the last decade or so, Salas signed for $5.6 million in January of 2023 and weeks later was in Arizona competing with upper-level minor leaguers and the occasional big leaguer during spring training. He was promoted from the extended spring group to Low-A Lake Elsinore just a few days before his 17th birthday, and he thrived there for most of the rest of his debut season.

In 2024, he really struggled with the bat at High-A Fort Wayne, posting a paltry .206/.288/.311 line there. He also struggled badly with ball-blocking for a huge chunk of time in the middle of the season and went through a phase of flinching and aversion to the baseball. By the very end of the regular season, this had started to improve, and Salas had a good, if sometimes haggard-looking, six-week run in the Arizona Fall League, hitting .228/.327/.424 with as many homers (four) as he had all year at Fort Wayne as the circuit’s second-youngest player.

It’s hard to contextualize Salas’ 2024 statistical performance because there isn’t much precedent for his promotion pace, and the little that does exist is different due to changes to the structure of the minors. Wander Franco and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. debuted in the Appy League, for instance, rather than in full-season ball like Salas, but both also reached High-A during the back half of their age-18 seasons, and both of them really hit. Salas did not, at least not on the surface. His underlying contact data is better than that of a .206 hitter (77% contact rate, 83% in-zone), but it isn’t awesome. Salas’ bat path creates some issues, as he’s underneath a lot of fastballs away from him and struggles to make good contact against softer stuff. He can snatch fastballs up around his hands, but otherwise isn’t a dangerous hitter right now. Salas is still super projectable and is likely to wind up with plus raw power at maturity. If he becomes as good a defender as he’s projected here, he can have a one-note offensive skill set and still be a really good player.

Salas’ receiving is incredibly still and quiet, and he’ll likely be a great pitch framer at maturity, if he isn’t already. His arm is comfortably plus, and the ease and consistency with which he exits his crouch and gets to his release point is unbelievable for anyone, let alone a catcher this age playing several levels above what is typical. The ball-blocking aspect should improve as Salas keeps getting bigger and his body can more comfortably weather the storm of catching. He remains projected as a premium all-around defender with rare raw power for his position, but the hit tool aspect of Salas’ profile is tracking below what was considered possible when he first debuted. It’s looking less likely Salas will be “Kyle Tucker, but a Gold Glove catcher.” Instead, his swing is reminiscent of Jason Heyward‘s and he might have a similar trajectory, where he’s merely very good rather than a franchise-altering talent.

Expand arrow_drop_down

22. Hagen Smith, SP, CHW

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from Arkansas (CHW)
Age 21.5 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr L / L FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/60 70/70 40/50 20/55 35/55 93-97 / 100

Smith’s breaking ball and fastball velocity form the foundation of a quick-moving impact starter.

Smith spent his underclass seasons jockeying back and forth between Arkansas’ bullpen and rotation, working just over 70 innings each year. Entering the spring of 2024, I thought he had more of a relief look, like a Brooks Raley 레일리 type, but Smith had an incredible season. He struck out damn near two batters per inning (161 K, 84 IP) and posted a .893 WHIP across 16 starts. A big reason why Smith now not only looks like a slam dunk starter prospect but potentially a top five pick is because of his fastball command, which he sustained throughout the 2024 season even as his velocity climbed. He averaged 95-96 mph, both pre- and post-draft, and touched 100. The rise/run combo of his fastball helps big swing-and-miss results, and Smith’s arm stroke (which is both very quick and very low) appears deceptive and makes hitters uncomfortable. It looks like the delivery of a shorter-levered Madison Bumgarner. Smith routinely locates his heater up and to the arm side of the plate, where its movement plays best. Off of that his huge sweeping slider bends in the opposite direction, and Smith commands that too. It doesn’t tip its break until very late in flight, and once it starts to move, it moves a ton, sometimes all the way from the arm-side edge of the plate to the dirt in the opposite batter’s box.

Those two pitches were enough for Smith to carve up SEC hitters, but he’ll probably need a third pitch to truly hit his ceiling. Right now, he has a changeup that he can control the location of, but it doesn’t have great movement. Smith’s arm stroke is quick and he has feel for location, so his changeup projection is quite good. He could also take a route similar to Bumgarner and mix in a cutter, which he’d need to develop from scratch. He has mid-rotation projection either way.

Expand arrow_drop_down

23. Bubba Chandler, SP, PIT

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2021 from North Oconee HS (PIT)
Age 22.4 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr S / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 45/50 55/70 40/50 95-98 / 99

Chandler’s command and slider consistency are pretty raw, but his athleticism and background (former multi-sport & two-way player) allow for projection in these areas. He has prototypical size and arm strength, and his changeup has improved a ton as a pro.

Chandler was a two-sport, two-way high schooler who could have gone to Clemson for baseball and football. Instead he signed for $3 million as the first pick in the 2021 third round and was developed as a two-way player for parts of two seasons before focusing on pitching beginning in 2023. Things have gone very well. Across the last two seasons, Chander has worked at least 110 innings and struck out a little more than a batter per frame, with his walk rate trending down to a little better than the big league average as he climbed to Triple-A in August. He was still sitting 95-98 at the very end of the season, even as he set a career-high mark for innings.

Chandler’s fastball is his best pitch. He hammers the top of the zone with it, and it generated plus chase and miss in 2024. His 86-90 mph changeup has progressed very quickly. It can sometimes sail on him, but it has plus tailing action that misses bats when Bubba keeps it down in the zone, and it can occasionally steal a strike by running back over the corner of the plate even when he mis-releases it. His slider hasn’t taken quite the same leap; too often it backs up on him and is hittable despite sitting 88-90 mph. It didn’t miss bats consistently in 2024, but its ceiling is still pretty exciting because of how hard Chandler throws it. Though his delivery is a bit more effortful than most big league starters, and he has occasionally struggled with walks as a pro, Chandler’s athleticism and multi-sport background make me want to continue projecting on his command deep into his 20s. There’s still development happening here (for instance, Chandler made his first start on four days rest in the middle of 2024), but so far, Chandler’s dev is going as well as could have been hoped when he was drafted, and he’s tracking like a mid-rotation starter. He’s entering his 40-man platform year and could debut late in the season so he can retain his rookie eligibility into 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

24. Brandon Sproat, SP, NYM

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2023 from Florida (NYM)
Age 24.4 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/60 45/45 50/60 45/45 40/45 94-98 / 100

Sproat has been healthy and sitting in the mid-to-upper-90s for several years, and changes made to his delivery since turning pro have improved his breaking stuff.

Sproat was the Mets’ 2022 third rounder, but he didn’t sign, opting instead to go back for a fourth year at Florida, where he exceeded 100 innings during the regular season; he was shut down after the Mets drafted him again.

Sproat was a cross-bodied, lower-slot guy in college, but he’s more direct to the plate now, and is throwing from more of a three-quarters slot, giving his fastball rise/run shape rather than the sink/tail of his college days. He has kept throwing hard amid the changes and has been living in the upper-90s without incident for several years. He was still reaching back for 100 late in the 2024 season. The delivery tweaks added depth and diversity to Sproat’s breaking pitches, and he’s now attacking with six different offerings. He has a sweeper-shaped slider in the 82-85 mph range, the shape of which he can alter to look more like a cutter, and an upper-70s curveball. He also mixes in two- and four-seam fastballs, and pronates over top of his trademark changeup. Breaking ball consistency was Sproat’s biggest issue at Florida and it looks as though the Mets have helped him make an adjustment there. That sweeper is currently his most consistent bat-misser, but I expect Sproat’s changeup will also return to being a weapon as he gets feel for this new delivery. His other pitches are deployed with such unpredictability that they’ll induce weak contact; he had a 50% groundball rate in 2024.

After working 116.1 innings and reaching Triple-A Syracuse in 2024, Sproat is on the doorstep of the big leagues and is likely to debut in 2025. He should be a mid-rotation stalwart soon.

Expand arrow_drop_down

25. Caden Dana, SP, LAA

Drafted: 11th Round, 2022 from Don Bosco Prep (NJ) (LAA)
Age 21.2 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
50/55 70/70 45/50 45/55 50/60 92-95 / 97

Dana looks like a mid-rotation workhorse with a complete repertoire, led by a dynamite slider.

Dana signed for just under $1.5 million as an 11th rounder in 2022, and it took him just two years to become a workhorse mid-rotation starter prospect. He had a Herculean 2024 season, as he was able to sustain average velocity for the entire year even though his workload doubled to 146 innings. At just 20 years old, Dana made 23 starts at Double-A (14 of them “quality starts”) before he had a rocky cup of coffee with the big club in September.

Dana is built like an innings-eating monster at a muscular 6-foot-4. Though he lacks precise command right now, his delivery is so loose and easy that it’s fair to project he’ll keep improving in this area and develop plus command of his four-pitch repertoire as he enters his prime. Dana’s best pitch is his slider, which resides in the 84-88 mph range and can be used to garner chase, or as a backdoor offering against lefties. He flashed a good changeup during his brief big league call-up — its power sink even made Kyle Tucker and Yordan Alvarez miss badly — but his feel for dotting it in enticing locations isn’t as consistent as it is for his other pitches (yet). Still, given how loose and easy his delivery is, it eventually should be.

The biggest change to Dana’s report compared to last cycle concerns his fastball grade. I was too worried about its in-zone viability on my last pass. It played great in the zone in 2024 and, considering how he held his arm strength under a massive innings increase, he might have another gear of velo in him once he gets used to working this much. Plus, it looks like he’s going to command it to the locations in which it plays best. Dana is basically big-league ready as he approaches his age-21 season and projects as a mid-rotation stalwart in the Germán Márquez mold.

Expand arrow_drop_down

26. Bryce Eldridge, 1B, SFG

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from James Madison HS (VA) (SFG)
Age 20.3 Height 6′ 7″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr L / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 60/80 45/70 45/30 30/40 60

Eldridge is an enormous power-hitting first base prospect whose swing is already geared to get to his tremendous raw thunder.

Eldridge is a human skyscraper at 6-foot-7 and has some of the most exciting raw power projection in all the minors. In his first full pro season, split pretty evenly between Low- and High-A, he hit .289/.372/.513 with 23 home runs. Then the Giants gave him two model-jobbing promotions to Double-A Richmond and Triple-A Sacramento; Eldridge played fewer than 10 games at each stop before he was sent to the Arizona Fall League, where he looked absolutely exhausted (especially on defense).

Eldridge is going to have enormous power in the Matt Olson/Adam Dunn zip code one day. He already has plus raw — 111 mph max velo, 106 mph EV90, 56% hard-hit rate in 2024 — and still has a ton of room on his frame for mass and strength. Any time a hitter this size comes along, there are justifiable doubts about whether or not he’ll be able to catch up to big league velocity, and while Eldridge is definitely going to have elevated strikeouts throughout his career, he also has a remarkably short swing for a hitter his size, and he has shown an ability to move the barrel around the zone. He still had more swings and misses than balls in play in 2024, which is often a scary indicator, but while his contact metrics are a full standard deviation below the big league average — 16% swinging strike rate, 77% in-zone contact, 67% overall — there’s just too much playable power here to fret over that.

Where Eldridge most needs to improve before he dons a big league uniform is on defense. It’s no doubt exhausting for a guy this size to bend and get deep into his lower body all summer, but by the end of the year, Eldridge was playing first base with such a high center of gravity that it often cost his team outs. There are times when he fails to stretch enough on a bang-bang play, or comes off the bag entirely because he can’t stretch enough, and this happens way more often than is acceptable at the big league level. Eldridge doesn’t have to be doing the splits at first to be a fine defender, but he definitely needs to learn how to hold the bag better. The Giants have tried him in right field (Eldridge was also a marginal pitching prospect in high school, and his arm would play there), but not at all in 2024; he seems like a first base-only prospect now. This guy is going to be a middle-of-the-order force, so it doesn’t really matter where he plays and it barely matters how good a defender he becomes, but it’s the aspect of his game that needs the most help right now. It’s plausible Eldridge will be up late in 2025, late enough for him to retain rookie eligibility entering 2026. Like your balsa wood bridge from shop class, if Eldridge’s hit tool can pass the test of upper-level pitching, he’ll be a top 10 prospect by that time.

Expand arrow_drop_down

27. Jacob Misiorowski, SP, MIL

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2022 from Crowder College (MIL)
Age 22.9 Height 6′ 7″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Cutter Command Sits/Tops
70/80 60/70 50/60 30/40 97-99 / 102

Misiorowski is a freaky 6-foot-7 righty who frequently touches 100 and flashes some plus-plus sliders. Because of his size and JUCO background, he might take a little longer to find consistent feel for release. If he never does, he’ll still be an elite late-inning option.

Misiorowski’s velocity climbed throughout the lead up to the 2022 draft; he was sitting 91-93 early in the year, but by the time the Combine rolled around, he was touching 100. Misiorowski quickly added a second breaking ball to his repertoire upon his entry to pro ball, and he’s been able to sustain upper-90s arm strength amid a 20-inning uptick in each of the last two years. He threw just shy of 100 innings in 2024 and was put in the bullpen late in the year as a way of limiting his workload (and in the event that the Brewers needed him out of the ‘pen for a playoff run). He’ll be sent out as a starter again in 2025.

Miz is incredibly nasty — even at the end of 2024, his fastball was averaging 98 mph and touching 101 — but he has walked 13-15% of opposing hitters at each minor league level. He is a gangly and wiry 6-foot-7, incredibly loose and explosive, and simply hasn’t developed sufficient body control to throw strikes yet. Because Misiorowski was a junior college draft pick, he’s pretty young — as you’re reading this Top 100 blurb, he’s still 22 years old, with stuff is so overwhelming that he has K’d 30% of Double- and Triple-A hitters. Both of his breaking balls added velocity in 2024; his curveball was averaging 85 mph once he got to Nashville, and he threw some 93-95 mph cutters during that time. There’s definitely risk that Misiorowski will go the way of Nate Pearson, another junior college pick with enormous stuff who not only hasn’t figured things out enough to start, but has also struggled in relief. That’s the floor here. But this is extra-planetary stuff we’re talking about, and Misiorowski is much more loose and sinewy than Pearson, and should have superior athletic longevity. Even if Miz ends up in the bullpen, he could be an Edwin Díaz-type closer. If he polishes his strike-throwing enough to start, then there really isn’t anyone to compare him to.

Expand arrow_drop_down

28. Chase Burns, SP, CIN

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from Wake Forest (CIN)
Age 22.1 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 70/70 50/55 30/40 30/45 96-99 / 101

Burns throws 100 and has two potentially devastating breaking balls.

Burns was one of those pitchers who was already touching 100 as a high schooler and throwing with such effort and violence that teams were standoffish and generally had him pref’d in the comp round. That wasn’t high enough for Burns to sign, and he ended up at Tennessee where, after a great freshman season as a starter, he was squeezed out of a talented rotation as a sophomore (but was great in high-leverage long relief). Burns transferred to Wake Forest (renowned for its pitching development) for his junior year and had an incredible season (100 innings, 96 baserunners, 191 strikeouts) but missed out on a national title. He went wire-to-wire as maybe the best pitching prospect in the 2024 draft class and could feasibly be in the big leagues early in 2025.

Burns has been able to sustain elite velocity for his entire career, and the way his pitches work together when he is commanding them (which is kind of an issue) is stylistically similar to Justin Verlander and Hunter Brown. While he’s a more tightly wound athlete than most front end big league starters, Burns otherwise has prototypical size and physicality. He will probably grow more and more barrel-chested as he ages; his frame started creeping that way late in college. Burns uses big spinal tilt to get to an extreme vertical arm slot that, in concert with his size, gives his fastball huge downhill plane. Even at his velocities (he averaged 98 and touched 101 in 2024), this causes his fastball to be hittable when it’s in the meat of the zone and below. He needs to command it more consistently to the upper boundary of the strike zone for that pitch to max out. If he can, then we’re in Verlander pitch mix territory because of the way Burns’ secondary stuff can play off of that fastball location.

His high arm slot makes it very difficult to spot breaking balls popping out of Burns’ hand because they’re always descending. His slider has nasty vertical depth for a pitch in the 87-90 mph range and can be used to get strike one, or deployed like a cutter in on the hands of lefties, or as a finishing pitch in the dirt. His curveball gives him a second, slower version of everything, but it’s not nearly as nasty as the slider. It’s tough to turn over a changeup from his arm slot, so Burns doesn’t — his slot lowers when he throws his change, and his best cambios are a well-located 45-grade offering. Because of the way his breaking balls play versus lefties, this shouldn’t be an issue in pro ball, though it wouldn’t hurt to have a good changeup. Burns’ mechanical operation requires a lot of effort and it detracts from his command. It’s possible he’ll continue to refine the feel for his body and release as he matures (he’s a 22-year-old kid throwing 100 for goodness sake), but it certainly wasn’t a polished part of his game as of draft time. He’s a pretty good bet to become a mid-rotation starter and has front-end upside if his command gets better.

Expand arrow_drop_down

29. Alfredo Duno, C, CIN

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Venezuela (CIN)
Age 19.1 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 235 Bat / Thr R / R FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/35 60/80 25/70 55/40 40/60 45

Duno is a freak who hasn’t been able to play much because of injuries. He has rare speed for a catcher, and could hit 30-plus homers at peak if he makes enough contact.

Duno is one of the freakier prospects in baseball, a tool shed 6-foot-3-ish catcher with elite power potential and and eye-popping speed for someone so big. His titanic size and strength, as well as his remarkable athleticism for such a huge teenager, give Duno both extraplanetary power potential and room to forecast huge growth on defense.

After a 2023 pro debut in the DSL, the Reds skipped Duno over the domestic complex and sent him straight to Low-A Daytona in 2024. There Duno slashed .267/.367/.422 with a 28.8% K% in 32 games before he broke a rib and was shut down for the rest of the year. Duno looked like he was starting to get a feel for how to use his size on defense in the couple of weeks leading up to his injury, and this was especially true when it came to ball-blocking. Duno’s mobility for a catcher his size is incredible, and the way he can bend and explode out of his crouch to field his position is very exciting. His throwing has not been as good as was advertised when he first signed. He dealt with elbow issues in 2023 (which is why he didn’t catch that year), and he hasn’t shown a consistently plus hose stateside, though some of that is because his footwork coming out of his crouch has been so inconsistent. It’s something to watch, but the way Duno progressed on defense in his little bit of healthy 2024 play was very positive overall.

At the plate, Duno is still getting a feel for his volcanic bat speed and bodily verve, but holy cow, can this guy swing it. He has plus raw power right now at age 19 and is going to grow into more. He’s big but not maxed out, built like Heliot Ramos scaled up four inches. Duno is also shockingly fast, and not just for his size, posting some run times to first base near 4.25 seconds in his limited action. Duno presents one of the most exciting toolsets in all of minor league baseball, but he hasn’t played very much yet, and whether or not his strikeout issues can improve via regular reps will dictate how good he becomes. He’s a risky prospect with superstar ceiling, and my tape study of his defense was encouraging enough to say that he raised his floor in 2024 even though he didn’t get the opportunity to race up the minor league ladder.

Expand arrow_drop_down

50 FV Prospects

30. Adrian Del Castillo, C, ARI

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2021 from Miami (ARI)
Age 25.4 Height 5′ 9″ Weight 208 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 55/55 45/55 20/20 30/40 35

Del Castillo is likely going to struggle to control the run game, but he should get to enough power to justify plenty of starts at DH. Think a lefty-hitting Ryan Jeffers.

Del Castillo looked like he might be the best catcher in his draft class and a potential future top 10 pick during his freshman year at Miami, a season that saw him also play some third base and right field. A COVID-shortened sophomore campaign meant he didn’t get the opportunity to repeat that performance and solidify his spot in the class, and then Del Castillo regressed as a hitter during his junior season and was a buy-low of sorts at pick no. 67. After a rough, strikeout-prone introduction to pro ball in 2021 and 2022, Del Castillo has been raking, and debuted with the big league club late in 2024. The hitting environments at Arizona’s upper-minors affiliates — Amarillo and Reno — should generate some skepticism about his overall statline from the last two seasons, but importantly, Del Castillo posted a career-best strikeout rate (by a huge margin) in 2024, and his strength and conditioning looks as though it has taken a meaningful step forward.

Del Castillo still has some issues on defense. Most significantly, his 2.05-ish second pop times are at the bottom of what tends to be acceptable for a regular catcher (he hasn’t played other positions as a pro). His excellent accuracy makes up for this to some extent, but he has allowed a career 80% stolen base success rate in the minors, with a 93% success rate on 29 attempts during his call-up to Phoenix. Other aspects of Del Castillo’s defense are also below average, but not so bad that he needs to change positions. Speedy opposing offenses will turn games against him into a track meet, but with Gabriel Moreno entrenched as the primary guy, los Serpientes get to pick their spots with the way Del Castillo is deployed.

He’s going to hit enough to justify some DH/1B reps, too, and depending on whether Arizona re-signs or replaces Joc Pederson and Christian Walker, Del Castillo could see 400 PA in 2025 as a combo backup catcher and platoon DH. He can still be beaten by well-executed fastballs up and away from him, but you had better put it there because he can do damage throughout the rest of the zone, especially against stuff on the inner half. His added strength shows in his TrackMan stats, as Del Castillo’s measurable power has taken a leap in two consecutive years; for example, his hard-hit rate has risen from 29% to 46% during that time. The big question here is whether Del Castillo’s significant improvement in strikeout rate will hold multi-year water. It’s logical that the added strength has had an impact on Del Castillo’s raw power, but has it also somehow made him a more skilled hitter? His batting stance changed somewhat in 2024, but the rest of his swing really hasn’t. He has always had lovely hitting hands, and he tracks and identifies breaking stuff, he just struggles to get on top of a somewhat large subset of heaters. Were Del Castillo definitely a “no” at catcher, then maybe a strikeout rate regression to his career norm would be something to fear, but there’s enough playable power here for him to be considered a primary catching prospect in a vacuum.

Expand arrow_drop_down

31. Nick Kurtz, 1B, ATH

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from Wake Forest (OAK)
Age 21.9 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 235 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 65/65 35/60 30/30 35/55 60

Kurtz is an advanced, well-rounded bat who has a good chance to be the first hitter from last year’s draft to debut in the bigs, and he could be a top 10 first baseman at peak.

A gigantic individual with enormous strength, Kurtz’s performance plateaued during his junior year at Wake, but he still clubbed more than 20 homers for the second consecutive season and posted a 1.294 OPS. The A’s made him the fourth overall pick and The Colonel reached Double-A by the end of the summer and then picked up Arizona Fall League reps. This is an upward re-evaluation of Kurtz compared to his pre-draft grade, which had him more in the middle of the first round.

Kurtz does some special stuff and has some unique physical characteristics that make him effective. He has plus power generated by big time thunder in his hands, and his swing features a back-side collapse, which creates power-producing loft. Despite his size, Kurtz is a short-levered guy. His front arm basically bars as he loads his hands, but his T-Rex levers help keep his swing from getting too long. He has terrific vertical plate coverage and is a threat to do damage all over the zone. Big league pitchers are likely to attack Kurtz on the outer third with fastballs and changeups, which his short levers/open stride combo sometimes cause him to swing inside. Concerns about covering the outer third of the zone were a big part of why Eric was lower on Kurtz before the draft, but while he does his fair share of whiffing in that location, he’s also incredibly dangerous to the opposite field when pitchers don’t quite execute there. His college (87% z-contact%, 80% overall contact) and post-draft data (86% in-zone, 76% contact, 8% SwStr%) reinforce confidence in his contact ability.

Kurtz isn’t a great athlete or bender, and he plays defense with a high center of gravity but scouts love his first base defense. He might have a relatively short shelf life as an athlete because he’s such a big guy, but now isn’t the time to fret about that. In the immediate future, Kurtz is likely to race to the big leagues and produce like an impact heart-of-the-order hitter at 1B.

Expand arrow_drop_down

32. Quinn Mathews, SP, STL

Drafted: 4th Round, 2023 from Stanford (STL)
Age 24.4 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 188 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/55 55/60 45/45 60/60 45/55 93-96 / 97

Mathews was a crafty college starter with generic stuff who has added velocity in pro ball.

The Cardinals gave Mathews $600,000 as a senior sign in the fourth round of the 2023 Draft after he threw 124.2 innings as Stanford’s Friday night starter. He struck out 158 batters and, infamous 2023 postseason pitch counts aside, he was viewed as a very safe, changeup-oriented backend starter prospect whose ceiling was capped by well-below-average velocity.

Then, ho hum, Mathews had a significant velocity spike in 2024 and led the minors in strikeouts. I’m buying that Mathews’ uptick in velocity (he averaged 91 in his final year at Stanford and was sitting 93-96 last year) is for real because it was accompanied by a physical change. This guy has been doing glute bridges and such; his lower body has gotten much, much stronger. He’s also not being ridden as hard as he was at Stanford, though his workload in college primed him to pitch 143.1 innings in his debut season as a pro. He’s among the most stretched-out, fully-baked pitching prospects in the minors, and could handle a full big league season workload this year if he had to.

Mathews’ secondary stuff remains strong. His slider has also enjoyed an uptick in velocity, climbing from 79-81 mph in college to 83-86 mph in pro ball, and touching above that. His changeup was a legit bat-missing offering in college and remains so. It plays very well off his fastball, solid arm speed sells the pitch, and it has late, sinking action. None of this has had a detrimental impact on Quinn’s command, or his mechanical look. He’s still a super smooth operator who takes a consistent, direct line to the plate and fills the zone. He is on pace to do what Tanner Bibbee did in Cleveland: race to the big leagues in a mid-rotation capacity after looking like the most vanilla of backend starters just a year before.

Expand arrow_drop_down

33. Angel Genao, 2B, CLE

Signed: International Signing Period, 2021 from Dominican Republic (CLE)
Age 20.7 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 180 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 45/55 30/55 50/50 40/50 45

Genao has real helium and might be a top 15 prospect next year if his arm strength improves enough for him to remain at shortstop. He should have a contact/power combination suitable for second or third base if he can’t.

Genao still has some issues to solve on defense before he can be considered a shortstop fit, as his arm strength and accuracy remain sketchy. But the good news is that it might not matter where he ends up playing defense, because Genao is starting to get stronger and deliver brutal blows to the baseball, which should enable him to profile at second or third base if it comes to that. He slashed a BABIP-aided .330/.379/.499 split between the two A-ball levels last season. Genao, who turns 21 in mid-May, has one of the cooler looking swings in prospectdom, a somewhat elaborate, full-body hack with a big finish behind him. He’s more skilled as a lefty, but he can damage mistakes from either side. Aspects of Genao’s swing might leave him vulnerable around his hands once he starts facing good velocity, but for now Genao (pronounced jen-OW) looks like an everyday middle infield performer in every statistical category. He’s a sneaky bet to wind up in the top 20 of next year’s list.

Expand arrow_drop_down

34. Max Clark, CF, DET

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Franklin HS (IN) (DET)
Age 20.2 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/60 40/45 30/45 70/70 40/50 45

Clark is a speedy center field prospect who makes hard line drive contact. He has a classic leadoff hitter’s profile.

Clark was a well-known, top-of-his-class high schooler several years before he was draft eligible because of his consistent, superlative performance in travel ball tournaments. He entered pro ball as a dynamic, old school leadoff hitter prospect, and so far that’s exactly what he looks like. Clark spent most of his first full pro season at Low-A Lakeland and was promoted to High-A West Michigan for the final month and a half of 2024. Combined, he slashed .279/.372/.421 and tallied 36 extra-base hits and 29 steals in 33 attempts in 107 games.

Clark’s lightning-quick hitting hands are best at snatching pitches around the top of the strike zone. He slices and hooks lots of hard, low-lying contact from line to line, then uses his speed to take extra bases. His swing doesn’t feature big lift, and Clark lacks overt, frame-based power projection, but the amount of contact he makes and its quality should enable him to hit for plenty of in-game power in pro ball — it will just likely manifest as 40 or 50 doubles rather than 30-plus home runs.

Clark still has some developing to do in center field. He easily has the speed to play the position well, but often looks uncomfortable at the catch point. None of Clark’s underlying data is particularly nutty when compared to big league averages, but it’s impressive across the board for an up-the-middle player his age. He’s still tracking like a traditional leadoff-hitting center fielder with a well-rounded game.

Expand arrow_drop_down

35. Alex Freeland, SS, LAD

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2022 from Central Florida (LAD)
Age 23.5 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 55/55 40/55 50/50 45/45 60

After strikeouts plagued the early portion of his pro career, Freeland had a breakout 2024 and now looks like a soon-to-be everyday shortstop.

For those who consider bat-to-ball skills to be an innate ability, I present Freeland, who had a 67% contact rate in 2023 and a 78% rate in 2024. This delta is most pronounced from the left side, as Freeland’s contact rate as a lefty was 70% in 2023 and a miraculous 80% in 2024. His left-handed swing appears toned down relative to 2023 (he’s gone from a leg kick to a toe tap), and in 2024, he climbed three levels to Triple-A while slashing .260/.387/.442. Freeland still swings hard and is capable of leaving the yard to all fields. He’s gotten better at covering the upper part of the strike zone from the left side, though his righty swing is much less dynamic and only geared for low-ball contact. Freeland’s excellent arm strength makes him a shortstop fit on defense despite below-average range. Without an obvious shortstop on the Dodgers big league roster, Freeland is in position to play a very important big league role in 2025 and might be the club’s long-term answer at that position.

Expand arrow_drop_down

36. Travis Bazzana, 2B, CLE

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from Oregon State (CLE)
Age 22.5 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 199 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 50/55 35/55 60/60 30/40 40

The first overall pick in the 2024 draft, Bazzana is a well-rounded hitter with low-ball power, but he’s not a good defender.

A six-sport athlete at Turramurra High School (about 20 minutes north of the Sydney Opera House), Bazzana ran track (100m dash, long jump and high jump), played soccer, basketball, and rugby, lettered in cricket from grades seven (!) through 12, was captain of his high school’s state championship cricket team, and was on Australia’s U18 Baseball World Cup roster in 2019. He was immediately a good college hitter at Oregon State, where he slashed .360/.497/.660 throughout his career and .407/.568/.911 as a junior with 28 homers and only 37 strikeouts. The Guardians made him the first overall pick in the 2024 draft and Bazzana struck out at a surprising 25.4% clip in 122 PA at High-A, twice what he did before the draft.

A compact athlete cut from the same cloth as Rougned Odor and Brian Dozier, Bazzana has terrific plate coverage, with power and swing loft that ensures he gets to it in games. This guy can bang to all fields. Short levers enable Bazzana to turn on inside pitches with power (this is where he’s most dangerous), while his raw strength and bat speed give him oppo-gap doubles pop. Bazzana has an uphill, damage-causing bat path all over the zone, and his lower body can dip to help him scoop low pitches.

Though he runs well in a straight line, Bazzana is not an especially graceful mover, nor a very good second base defender. He’s a 40-grade athlete in space, with below-average hands and arm strength. Very similar to JJ Wetherholt, Bazzana lacks the size of your typical impact big leaguer, but à la Rougie, there’s plenty of precedent for a guy like this succeeding. Considering his non-traditional baseball background, it’s conceivable that Bazzana still has room for growth as a hitter as he gains high-level experience. Athletic limitations make it tough to forecast the same kind of growth on defense, but Bazzana has been an “arrow up” guy for the last three seasons, and should be a good everyday second baseman even if he isn’t a great defender.

Expand arrow_drop_down

37. Leodalis De Vries, SS, SDP

Signed: International Signing Period, 2024 from Dominican Republic (SDP)
Age 18.4 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/45 45/60 25/60 40/50 35/55 60

De Vries is a switch-hitting shortstop prospect with power.

De Vries was unanimously viewed as the best prospect in the 2024 international signing class, a do-everything, switch-hitting infielder with power from both sides of the plate. At the time, there were international scouting folks whose club reports on De Vries said “everything is at least plus,” and who considered him a no-doubt shortstop with a 60- or 70-grade arm and a projectable frame; one executive considered him the best international prospect in more than a half decade. Same as they have with their recent high-profile prospects, the Padres wasted no time in pushing De Vries’ promotion pace. Most prospects who sign in a given year spend all of the rest of it in the D.R. getting their feet wet in pro ball. De Vries was on the Peoria complex weeks after he signed, and after a little bit of extended spring training action, he was sent out to Low-A Lake Elsinore when he was roughly 17 1/2. He slashed .237/.361/.441 at Elsinore before wrapping up his season in the Arizona Fall League.

De Vries doesn’t have great range or footspeed, and he isn’t a great bender, but basically everything else he’s doing at shortstop is great. He has one hell of an arm, which helps him make up for his lack of range to a degree, and he’s an acrobatic and creative defender capable of making highlight reel plays around the bag and in the hole to his right. I have him evaluated as a skill-based fit at short, but how his body and mobility develop as he ages is definitely something to monitor. If he has to move to, say, third base, it’s plausible he could be an amazing defender there.

On offense, De Vries can bang from both sides of the plate. He has remarkably consistent feel for elevation and enough power to be dangerous already at age 18. Both swings are fairly grooved, which is pretty typical for a switch-hitter this age, but De Vries is going to damage mistakes that run into his bat path. His contact performance — 80% in-zone, 72% overall — is south of what is typical for a big league shortstop, but it isn’t terrible, especially with his age and level in mind. De Vries hit exclusively left-handed for a stretch in late May and then returned to switch-hitting, and most of his homers came from the right side. This is a very talented young fella with the potential to be an impact middle infielder. The range of outcomes is pretty big. He could be an Ozzie Albies type of power-hitting second baseman, or an Asdrúbal Cabrera type shortstop, or a Wilson Betemit type of third baseman except with much better defense. Most of the outcomes are good so long as De Vries fine-tunes his game the way most teenage hitters have to.

Expand arrow_drop_down

38. Jesus Made, 2B, MIL

Signed: International Signing Period, 2024 from Dominican Republic (MIL)
Age 17.8 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/55 45/60 25/60 50/45 40/50 45

Made had an all-time great DSL season, reinforced by his exciting visual scouting look and eye-popping performance data.

Made was on the 2024 International Players section of The Board because the heuristics with which I approach that market gravitate toward switch-hitting up-the-middle guys with contact feel, even when they’re relatively small dudes. Made has become quite strong very quickly and has already shattered my expectations. He torched the 2024 DSL with one of the league’s more cartoonish all-time statlines — .331/.458/.554 with 21 extra-base hits in 51 games. His underlying TrackMan data was even more absurd — 90% in-zone contact, 89% overall contact, 15% chase, 108 mph max exit velo, 104 mph EV90, 47% hard-hit rate — especially when you consider Made’s age. Some of these marks are comfortably two standard deviations above the big league average. They are, of course, tough to contextualize given the nature of DSL pitching, but for the most part, Made’s visual scouting report backs up the notion that he’s a very talented young hitter. He has filled out and looks much stronger in his lower body now than he did when he was an amateur prospect, and he’s on a path where his physicality could be in the Robinson Canó or Ketel Marte area at maturity. The fluidity in Made’s hips as he swings and the authority in his hands through contact are both remarkable. He’s capable of impacting the baseball with lift in most of the zone (including when he’s crowded around his hands), and his swing has a gorgeous finish.

The ease and stillness with which Made can swing hard is pretty special. He did struggle some with velocity, and guys with swings naturally geared for low-ball contact like Made’s sometimes have issues that we simply don’t know about when they’re in the DSL because the pitching there isn’t good enough to illuminate them. But if Made were a domestic high school prospect, we’d absolutely be talking about him as the potential top overall pick in this year’s draft. He’s a potential do-everything middle infielder (he’s played 2B/SS/3B so far) with a special hit/power combination. The Brewers have been pretty aggressive about promoting their top DSL guys directly to full-season ball the following season, so Made is arguably priority no. 1 for me on the backfields during spring training, since he’s unlikely to stick around for extended.

Expand arrow_drop_down

39. Alejandro Rosario, SP, TEX

Drafted: 5th Round, 2023 from Miami (TEX)
Age 23.1 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 182 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Splitter Command Sits/Tops
55/60 55/60 60/60 40/50 94-97 / 99

The Rangers unlocked potential in Rosario that was dormant since he was in high school, and now he looks like a future star.

A very famous prospect since his high school underclass days, Rosario’s mid-to-upper-90s fastball used to miss frustratingly few bats because of its shape. He ran an ERA over 7.00 during both his sophomore and junior years, sitting 95-96 and flashing a plus slider and splitter. The Rangers quickly overhauled Rosario’s delivery, most notably his arm slot, which is now much more vertical. It’s totally changed the way Rosario’s fastball plays without sacrificing his arm strength or the quality of either secondary pitch, and it also improved his command. In a 2024 split evenly between Low- and High-A, he posted a 36.9% K%, a 3.7%(!) BB%, and a 2.24 ERA across 88.1 innings.

This is an “I’ll have what she’s having” situation. There are many people in baseball who are jealous of the Rangers for this one, and others who think Rosario should be furious with the staff at Miami for failing to help him improve in college, as it probably cost him a lot of money (Andrew Walters, too). Rosario’s line to the plate is much more direct and comfortable looking now than when he was in college. His mid-90s fastballs (Rosario mixes four- and two-seamers) have a flat enough angle to beat hitters above the zone even though they lack great ride. His breaking ball has morphed into a nasty two-plane slider that looks more like a curve when Rosario lands it in the zone, and his splitter (which sits about 90 mph) garnered an elite whiff rate in 2024. In less than a year, Rosario has gone from a frustrating Day Two prospect to a potential mid-rotation starter with three plus pitches. He could be the best pitching prospect in baseball a year from now if he proves he can sustain this performance across another 30 or innings while facing upper-level sticks.

Expand arrow_drop_down

40. AJ Smith-Shawver, SP, ATL

Drafted: 7th Round, 2021 from Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) (ATL)
Age 22.2 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 40/45 50/50 55/60 40/50 93-98 / 100

Smith-Shawver has big long-term ceiling. He hasn’t focused on baseball for very long and still reached Atlanta at age 20-21 amid injuries and changes to his repertoire. Once his mechanics click, look out.

A two-sport Texas Tech commit coming out of high school, Smith-Shawver raced to the big leagues in his second full season even as his repertoire and delivery were evolving. His strike-throwing stagnated during a homer-prone 2024 at Triple-A, but the barely-22-year-old Smith-Shawver (who also dealt with a grade two oblique strain last year) still checks basically every athletic box you’re looking for in an impact pitcher and he hasn’t focused solely on baseball for very long. Since he was drafted, the Braves have augmented AJ’s release point and, in 2022, altered the shape of his slider. In 2023, he added a mid-70s rainbow curveball that complements the shape of his riding mid-90s fastball. In 2024, he suddenly had a plus-flashing changeup. For Smith-Shawver to have entered pro ball as a fastball/slider projection guy and, amidst all these changes, reached the big leagues before he was legally allowed to drink is remarkable.

A super loose 6-foot-3, Smith-Shawver’s mechanical consistency should improve with reps. His fastball’s velocity and ride give it margin for error in the strike zone, but his secondary pitches (especially his slider) need to be located more consistently if they’re going to thrive. The developmental imperative for AJ and the Braves is to find more consistent slider release, so that that pitch is located off the plate rather than constantly backing up into the wheelhouse of righty batters.

I’m consciously avoiding prospect fatigue here — were Smith-Shawver a college righty sitting 95 mph with his changeup quality, we’d be talking about him as a lock to be a top 10 pick. The Braves’ aggressive promotion schedule has backed them into a bit of a corner here, as Smith-Shawver has just one option year left, which might impact his role in the short-term. Over time, I think he’ll be a good mid-rotation starter with two plus pitches and, eventually, much better command than he has right now.

Expand arrow_drop_down

41. Colt Emerson, 3B, SEA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from John Glenn HS (OH) (SEA)
Age 19.6 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/55 45/50 20/50 40/40 30/50 55

Injuries put a damper on Emerson’s 2024 season, but he has electric hitting hands and should be an everyday infielder in a few years, just probably not at shortstop.

Emerson had a loud introduction to pro ball in 2023, as he and the Mariners’ other high school draftees from that year’s class made noise in Modesto. His 2024 was more muted, in part because Emerson missed significant time with a foot fracture during the regular season (and looked slower on defense when he returned), and then was shut down during his Arizona Fall League stint (he raked there) because of a strained hammy. He is now a career .290/.419/.419 hitter in 94 minor league games.

Emerson’s hitting hands are lovely and explosive, working in an aesthetically pleasing loop that creates natural all-fields doubles power. He posted an 87% in-zone contact rate in 2024, and he has terrific feel for the strike zone. As sexy as his swing looks, I’m a tad worried about how his bat path will play against better velocity. Hitters with swings like this tend to cut underneath a lot of right-handed fastballs up-and-away from them. Still, you should keep in mind that Emerson will (probably, hopefully) be going from one extreme hitting environment to another in 2025 as he transitions from Everett to Arkansas, so even if his numbers take a dive, it doesn’t necessarily mean that I’m already right about that.

Emerson is a little too heavy-footed to play shortstop for me. He can throw from tough platforms but is a little too slow-twitch to be a big league shortstop. The Mariners gave him a little run at third base in 2024, and I think that’s his most likely eventual home. That will make it a little more important for Emerson to get to more power than he has to this point, but there should still be enough offense here for him to profile as an average everyday option there.

Expand arrow_drop_down

42. Chase Petty, SP, CIN

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Mainland HS (MIN)
Age 21.9 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/60 60/60 40/45 45/50 40/45 94-97 / 99

Petty is a phenomenal athlete who altered his approach to pitching in 2024.

Petty, who touched 102 in high school, came to the Reds from Minnesota during the spring of 2022 in a trade for Sonny Gray. After missing time with an elbow issue in 2023, he had a healthy and complete 2024 season in which he worked 137 innings spent mostly at Double-A Chattanooga, many more frames than he had thrown in any prior year. At the very end of the season, after Petty had been promoted to Louisville, his fastball was still sitting 94-97 mph.

Petty is an incredible on-mound athlete whose body whips around like a tornado throughout his delivery, which looks like a more consistent version of Abner Uribe’s. He has never had issues throwing strikes, and now he’s proven he can sustain plus arm strength under the stress of a starter’s load of innings. Another big development for Petty is that he’s altered his approach with his heater. He formerly used it as a low-in-the-zone sinker, but is now peppering the top of the strike zone with it. Off of that, he works with a low-90s cutter, a mid-80s slider, and a mid-80s changeup. The two-plane version of Petty’s slider is his nastiest pitch, while his cutter and changeup are more about inducing weak contact from lefties. If Petty can continue on this mid-rotation path, he’ll stand apart from the routine failures that most of the hardest throwing high school pitchers in the draft endure. He’s a special athlete with special arm strength and seemed to make relevant tweaks in 2024, while simultaneously increasing confidence that he can actually start by holding his stuff all year. There’s a pretty good chance he debuts at some point in 2025, though he may not exhaust rookie eligibility until 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

43. Agustin Ramirez, C, MIA

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2018 from Dominican Republic (NYY)
Age 23.4 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/45 60/65 40/60 30/30 40/45 45

Ramirez is a power-hitting catching prospect who will essentially be an everyday player by catching part-time and also getting reps at first base and DH.

In part because of the pandemic and in part because of the crowded field of Yankees catching prospects above him, it took Ramirez four years to exit rookie ball, which he did during a breakout 2023 that saw him climb from Low- to Double-A. In 2024, Ramirez slugged his way to another promotion with a monster .289/.372/.570 first half at Somerset, and he spent a month in Scranton before the Yankees traded him to Miami as part of the Jazz Chisholm Jr. deal.

The 2024 season was Ramirez’s first on the 40-man roster and, due to his immaturity on defense, it was a purely developmental season that used one of his option years. His receiving around the edge of the zone and pure arm strength are both fine, but Ramirez is currently pretty bad at picking balls in the dirt, and his slow exit from his crouch drags his pop times down into a slightly below-average range. He isn’t ready to be a big league defender just yet, but he also isn’t so bad that he has to slide to first base.

This is still a young catcher with rare power at a position where players tend to break late. Ramirez has big bat speed and power, and enough plate coverage to weaponize it. He’s maintained modest strikeout rates despite a max-effort style of swinging, with the finish of Agustin’s backswing so big that it’s often incredibly dangerous for the catcher behind him. He is going to do enough damage to warrant starts at first base and DH like Ryan Jeffers has — essentially an everyday player who catches some of the time. Expect Ramirez to get his feet wet at the big league level in 2025 and get regular at-bats at C/1B/DH, then establish himself as Miami’s primary catcher as soon as he gets a little better at playing defense.

Expand arrow_drop_down

44. Thayron Liranzo, C, DET

Signed: International Signing Period, 2021 from Dominican Republic (LAD)
Age 21.6 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/35 60/70 35/60 30/30 30/40 60

Liranzo may be on the 40-man roster already, but he’s still raw as a defender. His enormous size and switch-hitting power give him an All-Star ceiling if he can shore those things up.

Liranzo is a huge-framed, power-hitting catching prospect with several very raw attributes. He was part of the Dodgers’ Wilman Diaz/Rayne Doncon/Josue De Paula position player group on the complex and in Rancho Cucamonga, where Liranzo hit 24 bombs in 2023. Promoted to the High-A Midwest League in 2024, Liranzo struggled early in the season, as many hitters in that league do when they shift from training in Arizona to playing in 40 degree weather in Michigan. Liranzo hit .159 in April but slashed .262/.399/.424 the rest of the year. He was traded to Detroit as part of the Jack Flaherty deadline swap, went on a torrid run after the deal, and then continued to rake in the Arizona Fall League.

Liranzo is what I’d call a Michael Myers Prospect: slow-moving but inevitable. He’s raw enough that as he enters 2025, his 40-man platform year, he’s probably still a couple of seasons away from reaching the big leagues, and will need a few more after that to hit his ceiling. Chief among Liranzo’s developmental imperatives are his ball-blocking and throwing accuracy. When he has a clean exchange, Liranzo’s arm is lethal. He has uncommon athleticism for a guy his size and is capable of firing rockets from his knees or from funky arm angles, à la Patrick Bailey, with some pop times hovering around 1.80 seconds late in the 2024 season. So why has Liranzo allowed stolen bases at an 85% clip the last two years? He too often fumbles his exchange and can’t even get a throw off, or has the carry on his throw impacted by having a poor grip on the baseball. His stone-handed issues are evident when he tries to pick short hops, too, though Liranzo began receiving on one knee in 2024 and is learning how to use his size as a ball-blocking barrier from this body position. The physical tools to not only be a viable catcher, but a very good one, are here, and Liranzo is built like a lot of other late-blooming catchers whose size tends to win the war of attrition they’re all constantly fighting.

We can be hopeful that Liranzo will make similar progress on offense. He already has plus power from both sides of the plate at age 21 and will probably have another grade of it at his peak. He’s not a skilled hitter — Liranzo’s swing is grooved and he’s looking to run into mistakes that find the very middle of the zone — but he is very dangerous from both sides of the plate if he gets one. Again, we must remember this scouting axiom: Switch-hitters tend to develop late, as they have two swings they need to get a feel for. There’s evidence this has been happening for Liranzo. His contact rates improved four percentage points (both overall and in the strike zone) in 2024 compared to 2023, though at 69% and 77%, respectively, both marks would rank near the bottom of the primary catcher population. The natural launch in Liranzo’s best swings combined with his ability to mis-hit contact with enough strength to produce whoopsie doubles should allow him to get to power even though he’s going to strike out a ton. Projected as a flawed-but-good primary catcher overall, Liranzo should have some peak power-hitting seasons that make him an All-Star.

Expand arrow_drop_down

45. Coby Mayo, 1B, BAL

Drafted: 4th Round, 2020 from Stoneman Douglas HS (FL) (BAL)
Age 23.2 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 70/70 55/65 50/40 30/40 70

Mayo is an enormous pull hitter who struggled to deal with sliders in 2024. He probably needs to move to first base, where he should get to enough power to be an average regular.

Mayo had a five-year track record of mashing dating back to high school before elevated strikeouts began to creep into his profile once he was promoted to Double-A. Since arriving in Bowie and then Norfolk, his K% has hovered around 25%, while Mayo’s underlying contact rate has slowly dipped into a problematic range, from 75% to 73% to 70%, as he’s progressed up the minor league ladder the last three years. Mayo’s funky, pull-heavy swing generates enormous pull-side power and loft, and he’s on time to destroy fastballs (his splits against plus velocity are great) even though he’s a massive, long-levered 6-foot-5 guy. His tendency to pull off toward the third base side has left him very vulnerable to sliders on the outer half, and as Mayo has faced more sentient pitching at the upper levels, that has been more consistently exploited. In spite of this, Mayo crushed Triple-A (.287/.364/.562) at age 22, including after he returned from a month-long IL stint due to a fractured rib. He looked positively lost during his 17-game, late-season big league call up to Baltimore, in which Coby K’d in nearly half of his plate appearances. He is starting to have a more polarized power-over-hit offensive profile, but Mayo is so strong and his swing is so tailored to get to all of his power in games that he should still be an everyday bat.

Mayo’s profile becomes a little dicey if he ends up at a first base-only defender. His size makes it hard for him to move around at third base, and he has been speculatively projected to right field here at FanGraphs since before he was drafted because that’s the position that best takes advantage of his plus max-effort arm strength. The Orioles have shown no inclination to try Mayo out there, and began to deploy him at first base semi-frequently starting in 2023; he has played about 20 games there each of the last two seasons. It’s not ideal for a hitter whose bat is nearly ready for prime time to still have such an out-of-focus defensive fit. If Mayo can successfully play a more valuable position than first base, it will take pressure off the need for him to resolve his issues with sliders and give him a better chance to be a star-level performer. At first base (where he’s now projected, though I’d still love to see a right field trial ASAP), he’s more of an average regular.

Expand arrow_drop_down

46. Kevin Alcántara, CF, CHC

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2018 from Dominican Republic (NYY)
Age 22.6 Height 6′ 6″ Weight 188 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/35 60/70 45/60 60/60 50/60 55

Long, lanky, and loaded with tools and projection, Alcántara is a loose, 6-foot-6 outfielder with massive potential.

Alcántara’s time is nigh, as he enters his final option year in 2025. His looming lack of roster flexibility might force the Cubs, who even after effectively swapping Kyle Tucker in for Cody Bellinger in their outfield, are still flush with big league outfielders at the time of publication, to make a trade that clears room for him to be rostered on Opening Day 2025. That would preserve that final option in the event that Alcántara struggles to find his big league footing and absolutely needs another stretch at Triple-A Iowa to get himself right. This course of events is plausible because Alcántara is still fairly raw and has all the physical markers of a hitter who might require a prolonged adjustment period to actually start hitting.

At a freaky 6-foot-6, Alcántara’s swing is very long and difficult to time. He tends to be late on fastballs and struggles to pull them in the air, but he has plus bat speed and the power to leave the yard to the opposite field even when he isn’t on time. He has plus measureable pop at age 22 and he isn’t even close to being totally filled out; his frame has room for another 15-20 pounds of muscle before Alcántara’s mobility would be threatened by his size. Compounding the hit tool volatility here, however, is Alcántara’s tendency to miss secondary pitches, as he doesn’t identify or adjust to them all that well and had miss rates north of 40% against sliders and changeups in 2024. Alcántara also drives the ball into the ground a lot; his grounder rate was 50% in 2024, but he still managed to have 35 extra-base hits in 111 minor league games (he missed a few weeks with a shoulder injury) because he hits the ball so hard. Center fielders whose contact profiles resemble Alcántara’s include Jose Siri, Michael A. Taylor, James Outman, and Luis Robert Jr., guys whose performance tends to vary a lot year-to-year, and the same will likely be true of Alcántara.

The thing that stabilizes Alcántara’s profile is his center field defense, which has become quite good. He’s a plus runner with plus range and ball skills, and he plays with a fearlessness around the warning track. He’s gotten very good at the minutiae of the position, like deke’ing baserunners or running to a spot to position himself to throw before he’s collected the baseball. With Pete Crow-Armstrong around, Alcántara is more likely to be a potential Gold Glove corner outfielder in Chicago, but here he’s evaluated as a center fielder because, league-wide, that’s the position at which he has the most value. There’s bust risk here, but especially if his ability to lift the ball starts to improve, Alcántara is going to have some All Star-caliber power-hitting seasons and be a very valuable everyday outfielder.

Expand arrow_drop_down

47. Jac Caglianone, RF, KCR

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from Florida (KCR)
Age 22.0 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 245 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 70/80 35/65 40/40 30/50 70

Caglianone was a two-way college player with elite power and arm strength. If his plate discipline and feel for contact improve as he focuses on hitting, he’s going to explode.

The freakishly talented Caglianone presented a serious conundrum to teams picking atop the 2024 draft. He was perhaps as talented and toolsy a college player as there has been in the last decade or so, wielding elite raw power and, for parts of his career, elite fastball velocity, but Caglianone’s plate discipline and command were both so lacking that they threatened his entire profile on both sides of the ball. He slugged .738 and hit 33 homers as a sophomore, then slashed .419/.544/.875 with 35 bombs in his draft year, but long levers and poor ball/strike recognition (his chase rates approached 40% in college) caused Cags to whiff quite a bit more than his 8.2% junior year K% might otherwise indicate. His swing, which features a very aggressive hand load way up and away from his body, takes advantage of Caglianone’s prodigious athleticism to generate nutty power, but it might benefit from being toned down, not only to help stop Cags from striking out too much, but so that he doesn’t drive the ball into the ground so often, which was an issue after the draft. Caglianone looks as impressive in his uniform as anyone in pro baseball (his thighs are practically bursting out of his pants), and he’s strong enough to do damage with a simpler operation. These blemishes create risk, but the notion that Caglianone will polish his hit tool and feel for the strike zone once he’s been allowed to focus on hitting in pro ball makes him a very exciting prospect.

There’s also an exciting fallback option on the mound if strikeouts turn out to be a problem, though that comes with its own risk. Caglianone has an ideal pitcher’s frame at a hulking 6-foot-5. He’s limber and loose and powers down the mound with ease. His fastball sat 97-100 in 2023, and he has a great changeup. But Caglianone’s velocity plummeted in 2024, and he only averaged 92-93 mph from May until the end of the season. His two breaking balls (an upper-80s slider/cutter and a low-80s slurve) are also wildly inconsistent, as is his command and overall feel for pitching. A return to the mound should probably only be explored if Caglianone underwhelms as a hitter for the next couple of seasons. His ceiling as an everyday hitter is big enough that it should be his/Kansas City’s focus until it becomes clear that it isn’t going to work. This guy has 35 homer upside.

Expand arrow_drop_down

48. Josue De Paula, LF, LAD

Signed: International Signing Period, 2022 from Dominican Republic (LAD)
Age 19.7 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/40 55/70 20/60 45/45 20/40 60

De Paula is a loose-in-the-hips corner outfield prospect with enormous power potential that hasn’t been actualized yet.

For two consecutive years, De Paula has posted an above-average offensive line as a young-for-the-league hitter. He now sports a .291/.411/.420 career line, and his underlying exit velocities are remarkable for a teenager, as they’re nearly plus on the big league scale. This is a big, physical, loose-in-the-hips outfielder with enormous raw power projection and an early-career track record of plus plate discipline and closer-to-average contact rates. There are some funky elements to De Paula’s swing that have prevented him from tapping into his power in games, and that create some hit tool risk that hasn’t yet been exposed. De Paula tends to lose his base as he swings, his mechanics can get handsy (sometimes he still crushes the ball anyway), and he’ll spin out even when he isn’t swinging all that hard. De Paula is also very vulnerable to righty fastballs running up and away from him. He swings underneath a ton of them, which will become more detrimental to his production as he climbs the minors and faces better heaters. This is a prospect who is still more about projection than present ability on both sides of the ball. De Paula is a tentative corner defender with a great arm that he has not yet tamed. He’s talented enough to be valued as a 50 FV prospect because the power-hitting ceiling here is nutty if De Paula and the Dodgers can remedy even a few of his issues.

Expand arrow_drop_down

49. Kyle Teel, C, CHW

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Virginia (BOS)
Age 23.0 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 180 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/45 45/50 40/55 45/40 45/55 55

Teel is a great ball blocker and thrower, and should get to enough of his power to perform like an average primary catcher.

Teel, who raked in high school, opted out of the 2020 draft, raked in college, was picked in the middle of the 2023 first round, and has raked so far as a pro. He posted a 145 wRC+ at Double-A Portland in 2024, his first full pro season, and was promoted to Triple-A Worcester in mid-August. It seemed plausible that Teel might debut in Boston in 2025, in part because he has played so well and in part because incumbent catcher Connor Wong has struggled. Instead, Teel became the most well-rounded member of Chicago’s fairly crowded big league/Triple-A catching contingent when he was included in the Garrett Crochet deal.

Teel does not have the prototypical size and bulk of an everyday catcher; he’s a leaner athlete, and there are times when his lack of strength impacts his receiving and pitch framing at the bottom of the zone. But he does virtually everything else well on defense. He’s a really great ball-blocker and has sensational hands when picking balls in the dirt. Teel’s raw arm strength is average, but he is very accurate even when awkward pitch locations force him to contort his body to throw.

On offense, his skill set has begun to take on a power-over-hit flavor. He takes a lot of high-effort cuts, and the path of his classic, low-ball lefty swing is geared for lift. Teel has struggled to cover fastballs up and away from him enough that his contact rates have fallen a bit below the major league average at catcher, but his playable power and selectivity (which helps him hunt pitches he can drive) should be enough for him to perform like a good primary backstop.

Expand arrow_drop_down

50. Josue Briceño, C, DET

Signed: International Signing Period, 2022 from Venezuela (DET)
Age 20.4 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/50 50/60 30/50 30/30 40/50 50

Briceño has looked good behind the plate when healthy, and broke out in the Fall League. He’s a well-rounded hitter who needs to prove he can sustain big offensive performance under the rigors of an entire season behind the dish.

Briceño had a monster 2023 spent mostly on the Lakeland complex, slashing .319/.402/.529 with seven homers. He was among this system’s hard-hit leaders at a whopping 42%, one of the few lower-level hitters consistently hitting the ball 95-plus mph that year. He missed most of 2024 due to a strained PCL suffered in mid-May that kept him out until the end of August. He was only able to amass 176 regular season plate appearances and hit .278/.381/.377 (but repeated the 42% hard-hit rate), then Briceño went to the Arizona Fall League and won the League MVP with an absurd .433/.509/.867 line and 10 homers in 25 games.

Briceño has plus pull power and has now had consecutive years with strikeout rates around 14.5%. His power can be neutered if pitchers execute to the outer third of the zone, but Briceño is capable of going the other way to produce singles and doubles. Briceño didn’t catch at all after his knee injury, but he looked pretty good back here before he got hurt, much better than the year before. He does everything fairly well — receiving around the edge of the zone, ball-blocking, throwing — and has improved pretty quickly for such a big, young catcher. He should return to catching in 2025 and projects as an average defender at peak based on his early-2024 look. Another positive development here is Briceño’s conditioning. He looked much more lithe and limber in Arizona, and seemed to have cut weight without sacrificing power. Whereas in 2023, Briceño looked maxed out, he suddenly has positive physical projection. It’s rare for players who miss half the season or more with injury to have also had an overwhelmingly positive year, but that’s the case for Briceño, who looks like a future primary catcher.

Expand arrow_drop_down

51. Rhett Lowder, SP, CIN

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Wake Forest (CIN)
Age 22.9 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/55 55/60 50/50 45/50 92-96 / 97

Lowder is a strike-throwing sinker baller with a good slider and changeup.

Lowder’s performance steadily improved throughout his college career, which ended with a bang. He went 15-0 in 17 starts for Wake Forest prior to the College World Series and posted a sub-1.00 WHIP and sub-2.00 ERA during his draft spring. He was drafted seventh overall as a strike-throwing, quick-moving, three-pitch starter, and in his first full pro season, Lowder was exactly that. He ascended all the way to Cincinnati, where Lowder made six starts at the end of the year.

A gangly, unspectacular athlete with a theatrical, cross-bodied delivery, Lowder clearly works hard to keep his somewhat awkward frame in great shape. His bow-legged front side, and the stiffness in his hips and lower back, contribute to a funky operation that aids in deception, albeit via an atypical look for a starter. Lowder’s stuff isn’t overwhelming, but the pieces of his repertoire fit together nicely, and while imprecise, he fills the zone with them. His best pitch is his mid-80s slider, which has considerable length for a breaking ball that hard. The sink/tail action of his fastball limits its bat-missing ability in the strike zone, but its movement pairs nicely with his slider, and it’s hard for hitters to cover both sides of the plate when those two pitches are located well in sequence. Lowder’s changeup has enough tail and sink to miss the occasional bat, but it more frequently induces groundballs, which is true of his entire repertoire. Lowder is a low-variance fourth starter.

Expand arrow_drop_down

52. Jacob Wilson, SS, ATH

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Grand Canyon (OAK)
Age 22.9 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
60/70 35/40 30/35 45/45 45/50 60

Wilson is a bat-to-ball savant who plays acrobatic defense to make up for a lack of range. He’s a likely everyday player but might not hit for enough power to be a true star.

Wilson was the best bat-to-ball hitter in all of college baseball during both his sophomore and junior seasons. As a soph, he had the lowest strikeout rate among qualified college hitters at a microscopic 2.8%, while as a junior, Wilson only swung and missed a total of 18 times and posted a whopping 10-to-1 ball-in-play-to-whiff ratio. He ended his college career having hit .361/.419/.558 and became the sixth pick in a loaded draft.

Despite his collegiate success, Wilson was a fairly divisive amateur prospect due to the light, opposite-field nature of much of his contact, as if he were a better-gloved Nick Madrigal sequel. Wilson has allayed some of those concerns in pro ball, as he slashed an incredible .401/.446/.606 combined in the minors across a sample shortened by knee tendonitis. That slugging percentage isn’t emblematic of WIlson’s actual power (by a lot), but performance at that level demanded rapid promotion to the big leagues, where Wilson slashed .250/.314/.315 across 103 PA toward the end of 2024 (a season interrupted by a hamstring injury).

Though their tendencies as hitters are similar, Wilson separates himself from the spectre of Madrigal’s lack of impact with much better defense and better long-term physical projection. Wilson has unspectacular range and struggles with hot shots, but his actions are often acrobatic and fun once the ball is in his hands. He is going to make a ton of SportsCenter Top 10s making jump throws to first and crazy feeds to second.

Since turning pro, Wilson’s frame has filled out, especially in his shoulders. He’s strong enough to make doubles-oriented contact now, flattening his path to impact pitches at the top of the zone and dipping to scoop low ones, which he often drives the other way. Wilson’s inside-out style has him spraying fastballs to right field and pulling mistake breaking balls. He’s incredibly aggresive and chase-prone, but his bat control helps him get away with it. Low walk rates are common among players who make high-end rates of contact; guys like Luis Arraez, Madrigal, David Fletcher, Martín Prado, and countless others have had varying degrees of big league success despite not walking very much. What separates Wilson from many players of this ilk is that he’s a quality shortstop defender, and he has better long-term athletic projection than many of them because of his lanky build. Erick Aybar and Andrelton Simmons are fair performance comps for what readers should expect from Wilson’s arc as a hitter. He should be the Athletics’ everyday shortstop from Opening Day 2025 and onward, and while his ceiling is capped by a lack of power and what are likely to be low OBPs, his elite feel for contact should allow him to produce in the 2-3 WAR range.

Expand arrow_drop_down

53. Cooper Ingle, C, CLE

Drafted: 4th Round, 2023 from Clemson (CLE)
Age 23.0 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 35/40 30/35 50/50 45/55 50

Ingle is an athletic catcher with great contact skills, and his exchange on throws is fast enough to make up for a lack of pure arm strength.

Ingle is one of the twitchier athletes in the minors, with his quickness impacting the game in many different ways. This has been the case for Ingle on offense for a while. He was an excellent contact hitter at Clemson and he’s carried that ability seamlessly into pro ball. Of compact build, Ingle can wait forever before he decides whether or not to swing. He’s a count-working nightmare who spoils a ton of tough pitches and sprays line drive contact all over the field. In 2024, Ingle slashed .305/.419/.478 at mostly High-A. He walked more than he struck out and kept hitting even after he was promoted to Double-A Akron later in the year.

The key developments for Ingle in 2024 involved his physique and defense. He has always been on the smaller side of what is typical for a big league catcher, and while that remains true, he has added 15 pounds or so and is noticeably stockier than when he signed. The added strength has made Ingle a much quieter receiver and it hasn’t cost him any quickness; he is incredibly agile and it shows in his blocking and the way he exits his crouch. Ingle’s arm strength is only fair, so he needs to get rid of the baseball as quickly as possible, and he does. His accuracy can suffer because of his haste, but overall this approach worked for Ingle in 2024, as he’s hosed 26% of would-be base stealers and trended better after he was promoted to Akron. It’s still fair to wonder how Ingle’s body will hold up against the rigors of catching most days at the big league level (he caught 74 games in 2024), but he now has the skills to play the position well, and his combination of contact and on-base ability should be enough for him to clear the offensive bar at his position.

Expand arrow_drop_down

54. Kevin McGonigle, SS, DET

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Monsignor Bonner HS (PA) (DET)
Age 20.5 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 187 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/60 40/45 30/45 55/55 40/50 55

McGonigle is a compact shortstop with enough on base and contact skill to be an everyday player.

Ranked 19th on the 2023 Draft Board, McGonigle was arguably the high school player from that class with the highest floor because of his middle infield fit and contact ability. McGonigle’s stocky build capped his power projection and, theoretically, his ceiling, but his early-career contact performance has been special enough that he might become an impact player, even with modest raw pop.

McGonigle missed the beginning of the 2024 season due to a hamstring injury and the end of it due to a broken hamate. In between (60 games at Low-A Lakeland and 14 at High-A West Michigan), he slashed a fantastic .309/.401/.452 with more walks than strikeouts and 22 stolen in 24 attempts. His more granular data, albeit in a relatively small sample, was sensational. McGonigle posted an 88% contact rate and 41% hard-hit rate. There aren’t any big league hitters with marks that high in both categories, which, though impressive, is also an indication it’s probably not sustainable. Regardless, McGonigle’s short levers and terrific barrel feel, especially at the top of the strike zone, is real. He’s incredibly hard to beat, even when he expands the zone (which he does much more often with two strikes). McGonigle’s hard-hit rate comes more from contact consistency than big raw power. He has below-average raw and, at a maxed-out 5-foot-10, is unlikely to grow into a ton more. But his early count selectivity, and his ability to impact the ball with lift at the top of the zone, should still allow him to get to an okay amount of power for a shortstop.

McGonigle’s hands weren’t as crisp in 2024 as usual, but he still has enough arm for short, a well-calibrated internal clock, and great actions around the bag. He’s a low-variance everyday middle infielder tracking for a late-2027 debut.

Expand arrow_drop_down

55. Chase DeLauter, RF, CLE

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from James Madison (CLE)
Age 23.4 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 235 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 55/60 40/60 45/40 40/40 60

Several foot injuries have made it tough for DeLauter to stay on the field. When he’s healthy, he looks like a heart-of-the-order hitter.

We’re in Joel Embiid territory here. DeLauter has not been able to stay on the field since entering pro ball, and he’s now had several foot/ankle fractures and sprains dating back to college, some of which have recurred. He has played just 96 regular games since being drafted in 2022, but he has been great when he’s been healthy, and is a career .317/.387/.517 hitter who ended his 2024 season at Triple-A. DeLauter’s unique swing, in which he alters his footwork as a means of directing his barrel around the zone, often has a weird, truncated finish. This seems to work for him, in part because DeLauter’s hands are so strong and able to generate thunderous power without help from big rotational movement. While he’s best at golfing low pitches, DeLauter is also capable of taking ones on the outer third deep to the opposite field. His background contact data and lack of chase both reinforce the hitterish scouting look. His injuries have impacted his mobility when healthy such that it’s been hard to evaluate his defense; at his size, however, he’s absolutely ticketed for a corner. On talent, DeLauter looks like a heart-of-the-order hitter, but his persistent injuries force his FV grade down a shade compared to last year.

Expand arrow_drop_down

56. Luke Keaschall, CF, MIN

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2023 from Arizona State (MIN)
Age 22.5 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/55 40/50 35/50 55/55 30/40 35

Keaschall’s best position is “hitter.” A nagging elbow issue has clouded his defensive fit.

Keaschall had two solid underclass seasons at the University of San Francisco before he transferred to Arizona State for his draft year, during which he hit an unbelievable .353/.443/.725. He had some first round buzz (probably under slot; the rumor was Boston) and was heavy in the mix of model-driven teams because he was not yet 21 on draft day. Keaschall ended up signing for $1.5 million as a second-round pick.

The undersized Keaschall is a premium in-the-box athlete with a flexible and powerful lower body, as well as strong wrists that turn over through contact. At Arizona State, he would often look a little out of control, chasing a ton and swinging so hard that he found himself off balance. This is one of the areas in which Keaschall has changed since joining Minnesota’s system. His swing rate has dropped from 50% at ASU to 38% with the Twins, and he walked more than he struck out at High-A Cedar Rapids prior to a promotion to Double-A Wichita in late May. He slashed .303/.420/.483 with 15 homers and 21 doubles in 102 games even though he was dealing with nagging right elbow discomfort that ultimately led to a late-2024 Tommy John. Aside from his hard-hit rate, which might very well spike when he returns healthy in 2025, every one of Keaschall’s statistical indicators is better than the big league average. Keaschall’s swing brings consistent pull-side lift to the party, which means his power production might really pop if a healthy elbow means he can hit the baseball harder.

Keaschall’s best position is “hitter,” and his ultimate defensive home still isn’t clear. A bad college middle infielder, Keaschall continued to look rough at second base with Cedar Rapids, then he DH’d for most of May because of his elbow, and came out the other side playing more center field and even some first base. His feel for center was predictably pretty rough, but it got a little better as the season went on. Whether Keaschall’s elbow issue was part of why he looked so bad at second base, we just won’t know until he returns. A number of things could happen here, from “Keaschall’s feel for center field improves” to “healthy Keaschall hits for enough power to be a full-time first baseman.” But I’m confident enough in his bat to value him as an everyday player of some kind as he enters his age-22 season.

Expand arrow_drop_down

57. Marcelo Mayer, SS, BOS

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Eastlake HS (CA) (BOS)
Age 22.2 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/35 55/60 45/55 40/40 40/50 50

Mayer is a power-hitting shortstop who struggles to make contact with secondary stuff.

For a couple of years now, I’ve written about my apprehension surrounding Mayer’s issues with secondary stuff. Throughout his entire career, he has performed in spite of these issues, but they continue to terrify me. Marcelo’s front side is so upright throughout his swing that it makes it nearly impossible for him to dip and scoop soft stuff at the bottom of the strike zone and below. He can absolutely button a fastball, but big league pitchers aren’t going to show him many of those if he keeps performing like he has against secondaries. Just how stark is the contrast? Mayer had an 87% contact rate against fastballs last year, and a 57% contact rate against breaking balls. It seemed feasible in 2023 that his issues were the result of him playing through injury, but even as he slashed an amazing .307/.370/.480 at Double-A Portland in 2024, this problem lurked beneath the surface and is an unstable Jenga block in the middle of an otherwise exciting profile. Mayer is a powerful mistake hitter with all-fields juice when he gets a pitch in the the middle of the strike zone and above; he had a very impressive 50% hard-hit rate in 2024 and tallied 36 extra-base hits in just 77 games, as Mayer’s 2024 season was interrupted for the third straight year by injury. In consecutive years, he has had wrist, shoulder, and back issues, which season Mayer’s profile with another element of risk.

Mayer has always been a bit boxier than the usual elite shortstop prospect, but his hands and actions are so skilled and polished that he seemed likely to play there despite middling range. His footwork and actions are very polished, and the Red Sox have found a way to mask his mediocre range and arm strength (for shortstop) with good positioning. It isn’t sexy, but it works. Though Mayer’s performance (and my grade for him) has seesawed a bit during his prospect lifetime, he has enough power to be considered a productive, power-hitting shortstop.

Expand arrow_drop_down

58. Colson Montgomery, SS, CHW

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Southridge HS (IN) (CHW)
Age 23.0 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 55/60 45/55 40/40 30/40 50

Montgomery’s nutty 2023 now looks like a small sample anomaly. His power and on-base skills should still make him a productive everyday shortstop, but he’ll probably have a prolonged adjustment period at the big league level.

In 2024, Montgomery had a rough go of things at Triple-A Charlotte, where he slashed .214/.329/.381 and hit 18 homers in 130 games. Though he’s never had strikeout issues quite as stark as he showed in 2024, his incredible 2023 looks like a small sample anomaly compared to the rest of his upper-level output. The huge-framed Montgomery still has rare lefty power for an infielder and he has a great idea of the strike zone. His approach is geared to pull as often as he can — it lacks skill and nuance — and he struggles badly to cover the top of the strike zone.

Especially with the benefit of good positioning, Montgomery does enough to stay at shortstop (he makes plays coming in on the grass very well), but he’s a little too slow and clumsy to be considered average there. He should still produce like an good everyday shortstop because of his on-base ability and power relative to others at the position, but he may frustrate in other ways, especially initially. At peak, he could have some seasons with 30 homers and fair shortstop defense, but it almost certainly will not be right away. Montgomery isn’t a plug-and-play star who’ll be productive on arrival; it will probably take some time.

Expand arrow_drop_down

59. Kumar Rocker, SP, TEX

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from Vanderbilt (TEX)
Age 25.2 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 245 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/55 80/80 40/40 40/45 40/50 96-98 / 100

Rocker’s injury history is an inextricable aspect of his profile. His velocity and slider should allow him to be good as long as he’s healthy.

In part because of the modern media climate and our collective fixation with The Next Big Thing, Rocker’s baseball odyssey has been perhaps the most visible, dramatic and prolonged roller coaster ride any prospect has ever been subject to. He looked like a first rounder for much of his high school career, but his stuff dipped as the 2018 draft approached while his asking price did not, so teams backed away and Rocker went to Vanderbilt. After some rocky early starts his freshman year, something clicked for the right-hander and he was utterly dominant during the second half, culminating in a 19-strikeout no-hitter in a postseason game against Duke. That outing, and Vanderbilt’s run to a national title, made Rocker a household name even among casual baseball fans. The pandemic squashed his sophomore season, then Rocker emerged with a noticeably higher release point as a junior. He was fantastic early on, but his fastball lost two ticks as the spring progressed.

Despite his excellent career performance — 236.2 IP, 321 K, 68 BB, 2.89 ERA — volatility was an inextricable aspect of Rocker’s 2021 draft profile, and he fell to the Mets at 10th overall. New York was scared enough of his post-draft physical to squash his deal, which meant Rocker had to wait another year to enter pro ball. He pitched in the independent Frontier League in 2022 and his velocity was back, but again his arm slot had totally changed; this time, it was much lower than when he finished up at Vanderbilt. The Rangers made him a top five pick and sent Rocker to the 2022 Arizona Fall League, where he was scattering 95-97 mph fastballs and had his trademark, plus-plus slider. Then Rocker’s elbow blew out in May of 2023 and he had Tommy John, shelving him until July 2024. Upon his return, Rocker was touching 99-100 right out of the gate and again had changed his release, this time to a low-three-quarters slot but a vertical hand position. Over a span of two months, the Rangers gradually stretched him out to the point where he was working five innings, and he made his much deserved big league debut in mid-September.

Rocker’s fastball still lacks great shape, but he lives off of angle and velocity to beat hitters at the letters, and he has an explicit sinker version with more tailing action. Speaking of explicit, Rocker’s slider is still X-rated. It sat its usual 84-87 mph last year and generated misses at a 65% clip (the average for big league sliders is 34%), in part because Rocker’s command of it is great. Rocker has good feel for locating his 90 mph changeup, and while that pitch isn’t especially nasty, he’s barely been healthy enough to work on it and it might blossom late. He also has a show-me mid-70s curveball.

As deliriously happy as we all should be that Rocker has managed to persevere through all of these injuries while being in a white-hot spotlight, his injury history has to factor into the way he’s graded here. It’s great that he was bumping 100 mph last year, but he did so across just under 50 total innings. I do think his fastball is still vulnerable to big damage even though it’s really hard, and he’ll be more of a fourth starter on a good Rangers team rather than the club’s ace.

Expand arrow_drop_down

60. Braxton Ashcraft, SP, PIT

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2018 from Robinson HS (TX) (PIT)
Age 25.4 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Command Sits/Tops
50/50 70/70 55/55 40/45 93-97 / 98

Ashcraft is a hard-throwing starter with a great slider.

Ashcraft came back from Tommy John with a vengeance in 2023 and earned a 40-man roster spot. He was utterly dominant across his first 50 innings of Double-A to start 2024 and was promoted to Triple-A Indianapolis where, after a couple of starts, he was put on the IL three separate times with recurring forearm issues, the last of which ended his season. He has arrived at 2025 camp with intact velocity, but injuries are an inescapable aspect of Ashcraft’s profile due to his history and the violent nature of his delivery.

When healthy, Ashcraft has good stuff and should be a meaningful contributor to Pittsburgh’s pitching staff. His bread-and-butter pitch is his 88 mph slider, which has impressive length and depth for such a hard offering. It generated miss rates north of 40% in 2024, as did Ashcraft’s slower, 82-85 mph curveball, which he uses more as a backfoot weapon against lefties. Though his arm angle creates relatively ineffective movement on his fastball, Ashcraft’s mid-90s velocity makes up for it somewhat. Similar to Quinn Priester, there might be some issues with Ashcraft’s fastball getting hit, or at least he may have to pitch off his breaking stuff more frequently against big league hitters and thus operate less efficiently from a strike-throwing standpoint. He has never had issues throwing strikes in pro ball but also hasn’t demonstrated starter-level durability because his career has been interrupted by injuries and the pandemic; his 73 innings in 2024 were comfortably a career high.

Ashcraft seems likely to be optioned at the start of the 2025 season (he has two options left, while most of the Pirates’ projected rotation either does not, or is named Skenes or Jones), but he should graduate at some point this season as he’s called upon in response to injury. He has the talent to be a no. 4/5 starter when healthy.

Expand arrow_drop_down

61. Yoniel Curet, SP, TBR

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2019 from Dominican Republic (TBR)
Age 22.3 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/55 45/60 30/45 95-98 / 99

Curet was the minor league strikeout leader over the last couple of years and has held upper-90s velo for 120 innings. His changeup appeared to be taking off late in 2024.

Curet has led the minors in strikeouts over the last two seasons with 303 tickets punched in just 223 innings. He’s been walk-prone during that time, and his fastball has some round-down elements in its shape and plane, but Curet’s delivery is so relaxed and easy that I anticipate he’ll continue to polish that as he matures. He’s only 22, but for two consecutive years, he’s shown he can sustain mid-to-upper-90s velocity across a starter’s load of innings. In 2024, his first year on Tampa Bay’s 40-man roster, he worked 119 innings, ran a 2.95 ERA and 3.76 FIP, and was still reaching back for 97-98 mph fastballs in September with Double-A Montgomery.

Curet’s fastball generated plus miss in 2024 even though it has suboptimal shape. When he’s locating it to the arm-side part of the plate, it has exploding rise/run movement. Curet’s slider has plus potential thanks to its rare velocity. It’ll touch 90 mph and often acts more like a cutter than a true slider, starting above the zone and bending down into it when it’s at its best. Even though it isn’t truly switched on as a chase-inducing weapon right now, it has still been able to generate above-average miss. Something as simple as altering Curet’s position on the rubber might help it look more enticing to hitters.

The real late-season development for Curet was his changeup, which he used twice as often in Montgomery as he did in Bowling Green. As you can imagine from a guy who has below-average command and is just starting to use a new pitch, Curet’s feel for locating it was inconsistent, but a good number of his changeups have huge tailing action and downward finish. The ease of his delivery makes this pitch very promising; it generated a 60% miss and 45% chase rate in August and September even though Curet had basically only just begun working with it. Curet’s fastball, durability (this guy’s legs are like tree trunks), and proximity to the big leagues drive a long-term mid-rotation projection. He’s entering his second option year and should make his big league debut at some point in 2025.

Expand arrow_drop_down

62. Jett Williams, CF, NYM

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from Rockwall-Heath HS (TX) (NYM)
Age 21.3 Height 5′ 6″ Weight 178 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 50/55 30/50 70/70 40/60 45

Williams has an amazing power/speed combo for such a short player. His defensive home is unsettled, but it’s likely going to be an up-the-middle position.

Williams added significant strength between his junior and senior years of high school, which is how he elevated his stock into the first round of the 2022 draft. He then dominated A-ball in his first full pro season before looking overmatched late in 2023 and early in 2024 at Double-A Binghamton. He was shut down with right wrist soreness in late April with the hope that cortisone and rest would allow him to heal, but instead he needed TFCC debridement surgery and missed four months. He was either out or compromised for too much of 2024 to really glean anything from his performance or underlying data. He went to Arizona for the Fall League, and I thought he looked fine there even though he K’d at a 30% clip. It felt like a season that Jett (and those of us evaluating him) should just flush and move on from.

Williams still swings with incredible verve and power for a 5-foot-6 guy. His top hand is incredibly strong through contact, giving him power back through the middle of the field. He has historically had issues with high fastballs, and those will likely persist due to the uppercut nature of his swing. Williams’ defensive fit is still not clear. I’ve had him projected to center field because of his speed, and due to the throwing accuracy issues he’s had from shortstop, which were present in 2024. Jett split time evenly between center field and shortstop in Arizona, and was running in the 4.1s for me there. He’s blazingly fast and should be fine in center with reps. For Williams to be an everyday center fielder would be mold-breaking in a sense; there really aren’t players this size who play out there every day. But Jett is already kind of mold-breaking because he’s immensely strong for a 5-foot-6 guy, and I think that he’ll get to enough power to play out there in an everyday capacity.

Expand arrow_drop_down

63. JJ Wetherholt, SS, STL

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from West Virginia (STL)
Age 22.4 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 185 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/50 50/50 35/50 50/50 40/45 50

Wetherholt has looked better at shortstop since returning from his pre-draft hamstring injury, and should be a well-rounded everyday player either there or at second base.

Wetherholt is a native of Mars, Pennsylvania, and in college, he hit like he isn’t of this planet. He was a career .370/.468/.625 hitter at West Virginia, a unanimous first team All-American as a sophomore and the top ranked player on the FanGraphs Draft Board entering the 2024 season.

Wetherholt’s swing often has huge finish through contact. A big bat wrap gives him a very aggressive angle of attack with the barrel, and feel for oppo contact saves him when he’s a little late, which was more common in 2024 (including after the draft), as he was less apt to pull the baseball than in 2023. His in-zone contact rate was in the 90-93% range the last two years of school, and then was 82% in a small A-ball sample after the draft. A thing to watch here in 2025 is whether or not Wetherholt can start pulling the baseball more like he did in 2023.

Wetherholt suffered a hamstring injury at the start of the 2024 college season and missed about six weeks. On defense, he can be slow to approach balls hit in front of him, and sometimes he struggles to bend and turn around the baseball quickly, hallmarks of a guy with a tight lower body. Wetherholt looked better in this regard once he returned from the hammy issue, but the general flexibility in his lower body is something to monitor. He played a mix of second base, third base, and left field as an underclassman, but was exclusively a shortstop in 2024, and his chances of remaining there are much better than they appeared 12 months ago. Staying at short would give his offense some room to breath if in fact Wetherholt’s newfound tendency to inside-out the baseball is a permanent aspect of his profile. He has average everyday shortstop projection.

Expand arrow_drop_down

64. Tink Hence, SP, STL

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2020 from Watson Chapel HS (AR) (STL)
Age 22.5 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/45 50/55 60/70 45/55 91-97 / 98

Hence’s athleticism and fastball have regressed a bit from their peak forms, but a couple years after his changeup took a leap, Tink’s command has now too.

Hence was selected in the shortened 2020 draft and was one of the youngest players taken that year. After he was brought along very slowly at the onset of his pro career, Hence maintained mid-90s velocity across 40-inning workload increases in 2022 and 2023 before experiencing a slight downtick early in 2024. He worked 96 frames in 2023, but was handled with such care in 2024 that he only threw 79.2, though Hence was as dominant as he’s ever been.

Tink’s changeup took a huge leap forward in 2023, and not only has it become his best pitch, but it’s now one of the better changeups in the minor leagues. He’ll also flash the occasional plus breaking ball, but not consistently. Hence’s fastball wasn’t finishing quite as well at the end of 2023 as it was when he looked like a Bryce Miller clone with better secondary stuff. Ideally, he’d continue to get physically stronger for the purposes of durability, an area where I think Hence has plateaued. He still looked very skinny in 2024, and his fastball both missed bats at a shockingly low rate and lost a tick compared to 2023. He’s a good on-mound athlete, but he’s on the smaller side, and added strength might help him have the stamina to finish his pitches more consistently. Hence has thrown strikes and projects to have a starter-quality mix. He hasn’t take the big leap I hoped (on the contrary, there are reasons to be worried about the velo dip), but Tink’s secondary stuff is just so good that he should be an effective fourth starter even if that’s a consistent issue.

Expand arrow_drop_down

65. Will Warren, SP, NYY

Drafted: 8th Round, 2021 from Southeastern Louisiana (NYY)
Age 25.7 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
50/50 70/70 50/55 45/50 40/45 92-95 / 97

Warren is a kitchen sink righty with a great sweeper and changeup.

Warren yo-yo’d between the bullpen and the rotation at Southeastern Louisiana and went unselected as a true junior in the shortened 2020 draft. He moved into the Lions’ rotation in 2021 and had a great season — 91 IP, 95 K, just 98 baserunners allowed — despite sitting mostly 90-91 mph. When play began in 2022, Warren had a new breaking ball and much more velocity, which he has sustained across the last couple of seasons en route to a couple of big league call-ups in 2024.

Warren had an elevated ERA in 2024, which was his second consecutive season with HR/FB rates twice the major league average. Some of that can be attributed to the hitting environment at Somerset and most of Triple-A, but it is a weird aspect of Warren’s sinker-heavy profile. The rest of what Warren brings to the table is stable and fairly exciting. He’s a kitchen sink type who can attack hitters in a myriad of ways, all with viable (and sometimes plus) big league stuff. Against righties, Warren uses a sinker/sweeper combination, and will occasionally run his four-seamer up the ladder. Against lefties, he becomes a four-seamer/changeup guy, with the occasional in-zone sweeper as a way of stealing strikes. Warren also has a cutter that, when he locates it, is brutal in on the hands of lefties; he barely busted it out during his half-dozen big league outings. Though his sweeper is easily his nastiest pitch, all of Warren’s pitches flash plus. He lacks surgical command, but his ability to get groundballs (his sinker generated them at a 63% clip in 2024) should bail him out of the occasional walk.

Guys with sinking/tailing stuff like Warren’s can tend to be more vulnerable to extra-base damage when they make a mistake, and it’s possible I’m underappreciating this aspect of his profile. But despite his 2024 ERA, Warren still looks like an big league-ready fourth starter. He has been remarkably durable and worked at least 120 innings each of the past three seasons, and he has five good pitches and a mature approach to their usage. Warren seems likely to start the season as the Yankees’ sixth starter, and is pretty clearly the most talented of the 40-man arms projected to begin the season in Scranton. He’s very likely to exhaust rookie eligibility in 2025 and entrench himself in the New York rotation for the next half decade.

Expand arrow_drop_down

66. Jake Bloss, SP, TOR

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2023 from Georgetown (HOU)
Age 23.7 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/55 60/60 55/55 40/50 40/50 92-95 / 96

Bloss’ fastball ride and coffer of distinct secondary pitches make him a nearly big league-ready no. 4 starter.

Bloss was taken 99th overall in the 2023 draft out of Georgetown after spending his first three years of collegiate ball at Lafayette College. The Astros promoted him very aggressively; Bloss began the 2024 season at High-A and made his big league debut in June. About a month later, he was traded to Toronto as part of the Yusei Kikuchi deal, and he finished the season at Triple-A Buffalo. Bloss’ performance dipped down the stretch and he carried a bloated ERA at Buffalo, but I’m staying on him. Remember, not long ago this guy was facing Patriot League hitters, and now he’s staring down Gunnar Henderson.

Bloss is a high-waisted 6-foot-3 and has incredibly loose, long levers that, along with his big stride down the mound, help him generate nearly seven feet of extension. His fastball only sits 92-95 mph, but it has nearly perfect backspinning ride. Off of that Bloss works with two distinct breaking balls: an upper-70s curveball with great depth and shape that mirrors his fastball, and a mid-80s slider/cutter. The slider has tight, late movement, but lacks chase-inducing length right now. Bloss also has a changeup that, based on the fluidity of his arm action, should mature to average with time, though his curveball’s depth gives him a weapon against lefties right now. The rate at which Bloss has developed and, for the most part, succeeded is exciting, and he should entrench himself toward the back of Toronto’s rotation at some point in 2025.

Expand arrow_drop_down

67. Parker Messick, SP, CLE

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2022 from Florida State (CLE)
Age 24.3 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/45 50/55 60/60 50/60 91-94 / 95

Messick is a fiery lefty with plus command of a plus changeup.

Messick, who is third in the minors in strikeouts over the last two seasons, has been a remarkably consistent strike-thrower whose fastball has punched above its weight since he was at Florida State. In 2024, he split the season between High- and Double-A, pitched 133.2 innings, K’d 30.2% of opposing hitters, and posted a 2.83 ERA. Messick’s 92 mph fastball doesn’t have a ton of carry to it, but it does run uphill and can garner whiffs via its angle. His changeup is at least plus, and the loose, whippy nature of Messick’s arm action helps sell it to hitters like a podcaster hawking dietary supplements. Pitchers with plus command and plus changeups tend to overachieve, and the ultra-competitive, sneaky athletic Messick (who has shed a good bit of weight since college) is in that vein. He’s tracking like a contender’s fourth starter and could be up at some point in 2025, a little bit ahead of his chalk 40-man timeline.

Expand arrow_drop_down

68. Carter Jensen, C, KCR

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2021 from Park Hill Senior HS (MO) (KCR)
Age 21.6 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 55/60 45/55 40/40 40/50 50

Jensen is a power-hitting lefty catcher who is slowly improving on defense.

Unpolished defense and hit tool question marks have long been Jensen’s prospect bugaboos, and in 2024, he showed signs of improving both enough to be elevated in the Top 100. He was sent back to the Midwest League and slashed a robust .271/.386/.435 with a 15.2% walk rate and 22.1% strikeout rate before he was promoted to Double-A Northwest Arkansas after the All-Star break; Jensen kept slugging, though his peripherals backed up a tad. Then he had a monstrous Arizona Fall League stint during which he slugged .800.

Jensen’s tendency to run deep counts, and the way his swing is geared for power, will probably lead to elevated K’s at the big league level, but his contact data has encouragingly hovered around the big league average throughout the last two seasons. He’s also patient and has rare juice for a catcher. Jensen’s swing is very explosive. He uses an enormous stride that spans nearly the entire batter’s box, and his bat path has bloodthirsty lift. At a position where having one good offensive tool is often enough, Jensen should clear the bar thanks to his power and on-base skills.

Jensen still needs to improve as a defender, but his size and athleticism give him a great shot to do so. His ball-blocking has already gotten much better, but his throwing and receiving both need to quiet down. You can see Jensen’s athleticism and flexibility when he throws, but it often takes him too long to get rid of the ball as he thrashes out of his crouch with inconsistent footwork. Jensen’s hands are also far too active and noisy as he prepares to receive pitches. These issues are pretty common for catching prospects this age, and are technical problems rather than an indication of a lack of talent. Already a virtual lock to be put on Kansas City’s 40-man after the 2025 season, Jensen’s big league ETA will be dictated by how quickly he can improve his issues on defense. He seems pretty likely to spend at least most of the next two seasons in the minors and then compete for primary catching duties once Salvador Perez’s contract expires.

Expand arrow_drop_down

69. Joe Mack, C, MIA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Williamsville East HS (MIA)
Age 22.1 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/30 55/60 35/50 45/40 40/55 70

Mack is a power-hitting lefty catcher with a plus-plus arm.

Mack is a lefty-hitting catcher with a big frame, plus bat speed, and a grooved, uppercut swing that helped him hit 24 bombs in 2024, mostly at Double-A Pensacola. Though ‘Cola and a couple other Southern League ballparks tend to inflate home runs, Mack has real juice and big league physicality. At times his cut can be a little out of control, and Mack often swings over the top of secondary stuff, but he has rare all-fields power for a catcher and, even at age 22, there is still room for muscle on his frame. Mack has also posted above-average offensive lines at every level except for his 2023 campaign at High-A. Catchers sometimes play through bumps and bruises that impact their offensive production for long periods of time, and it’s plausible that was true of Mack in 2023. He’s going to swing and miss a ton, both because of how much effort his swing features and because Mack is not a patient hitter, but so long as he’s getting to his power, that’s fine for a catcher.

Mack still needs to develop as a ball-blocker. His crouch — an endangered species, as Mack sometimes catches from a traditional crouch rather than on one knee — can be a little high and make it tough for him to get to the ground in time to act as a wild pitch barrier. He is otherwise a good defender with a tremendous arm. Capable of popping sub-1.9, Mack hosed 34% of would-be basestealers in 2024, and as stolen base attempts in the big leagues climb, it helps to have a catcher with a 70 arm. He’s entering his 40-man platform year and is on pace to get his feet wet in the big leagues late in 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

70. Cam Smith, 3B, HOU

Drafted: 1st Round, 2024 from Florida State (CHC)
Age 22.0 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/45 60/70 40/60 40/40 30/55 55

Smith has similarities to Alec Bohm when he was a fresh draftee. He might get too big to play third base, and his swing isn’t actualized to get to all of his raw power. Smith should be an everyday player if even one of these things falls his way.

Smith is an XL third baseman with rare defensive ability for a player his size. Built like an outside linebacker at 6-foot-3 and 225 pounds or so, Smith slashed .331/.420/.594 during his career at Florida State and showed substantial improvement to his strikeout and walk peripherals as a draft-eligible sophomore. The Cubs selected him 14th overall (he was seventh on our Draft Board) and Smith posted strong contact and power numbers after he signed. He slashed .313/.396/.609 in 134 PA, with an 84% zone contact rate (77% overall), 111 mph max exit velo, 107 mph EV90 (the big league average is 104-105), and 43% hard-hit rate. Those are pretty good, and they reinforced Smith’s fairly aggressive draft ranking. He was then traded to Houston as part of the Kyle Tucker deal.

Big all-fields power headlines Smith’s profile. He’s a super strong guy who can generate huge power with little mechanical distance. His swing changed during his sophomore year and he now looks like a more crouched Alec Bohm, with simple footwork, no stride with two strikes, a shallow load, and a bat path that tends to lift the ball less often than is ideal for someone with this kind of juice. Sometimes Smith’s lower half is so stagnant that it looks like it’s preventing him from getting to pitches on the outer edge; he ends up stuck in the mud and can’t reach out there. The same could be said for Smith’s swing overall, which detracts somewhat from his athleticism. He’s definitely strong enough to hit for power with a simple swing, though he doesn’t always look comfortable with the one he’s got right now.

On defense, Smith has rare bend for an athlete his size and at times makes incredible plays for such a big guy. He’s not twitchy or fast, but he’s remarkably graceful and capable of making accurate throws from all kinds of odd platforms. His hands are inconsistent, and if he keeps growing and getting bigger into his 20s (think age 21 Miguel Sanó, that’s where Smith’s frame is at right now), he’ll possibly lack the mobility to play third base. I’m more bullish about his ability to improve and remain there than the general consensus of amateur scout sources who provided feedback on the 2024 draft prospect list. In fact, I think Smith will be an above-average defender at third despite what will likely be below-average range. He projects as an everyday third baseman, though he might be slower to hit his ceiling than most high college draft picks due to the nature of his swing.

Expand arrow_drop_down

71. Chayce McDermott, SP, BAL

Drafted: 4th Round, 2021 from Ball State (HOU)
Age 26.5 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 197 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/60 50/55 55/55 50/60 30/40 93-95 / 97

McDermott has struggled with walks, but he’ll show you four plus pitches and his athleticism indicates the command might arrive late.

McDermott was drafted by Houston in 2021 and then was traded to Baltimore as part of the Trey Mancini multi-team swap a couple of deadlines ago. He has tallied more minor league strikeouts than any other pitcher since 2022, with 456 ponchados in 322 innings. In 2024, McDermott struck out a third of opposing batters at Triple-A Norfolk across 100 innings, a total limited by a scapula stress reaction in his right shoulder that cost him all of August. The shoulder injuries are starting to stack for C-Mac, as just a few days before Top 100 publication, he was shut down with a lat/teres strain suffered before Grapefruit League play even began.

McDermott has impact stuff, and on any given night he’ll show you four plus pitches, but his arms-and-legs delivery has proven difficult for him to corral, and he’s walked 14% of opposing hitters during the three-year span in which he’s led the minors in strikeouts. McDermott has a huge wingspan and creates plus extension down the mound, which helps his heater jump on hitters. It also contributes to the inconsistency of his arm swing and is part of why he sprays his fastball all over the place. He sits 94 with flat angle and ride, and has two nasty breaking balls, a 75-78 mph curveball and an 82-85 mph slider. McDermott is such a loose, whippy athlete that even though he’s deep into his mid-20s, I’m still of the mind that starter-level feel for location will come with time. Evidence to that end: His changeup took a big step forward in 2024, and he was busting it out as a right-on-right weapon late in the year. The fact that he’s had two shoulder issues in a relatively short period of time is a concerning bummer, but when healthy, McDermott should be a five-and-dive type of mid-rotation starter.

Expand arrow_drop_down

72. Chandler Simpson, CF, TBR

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2022 from Georgia Tech (TBR)
Age 24.2 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
60/70 30/30 20/20 80/80 40/60 40

Simpson is an 80-grade runner and slash-and-dash hitter who looks like he might steal 80 bases at the big league level. He’s also fairly new to center field, and has big long-term ceiling out there.

A transfer from UAB to Georgia Tech, Simpson was one of the more fascinating 2022 draft prospects because he had elite speed and bat-to-ball performance in college, but he was also a bad second base defender with bottom-of-the-scale power. Though he is still not hitting for any power, Simpson has had resounding success in pro ball. Every last bit of his superlative contact ability has translated, and Simpson is now a career .326/.394/.375 hitter after having spent most of 2024 at Double-A Montgomery.

Mid-minors defenses have been the Wile E. Coyote to Simpson’s Roadrunner. He is a flat out 80-grade runner who’ll run 3.8 from home to first. When he’s legging out a hustle double or going first-to-third, it barely looks like Simpson is touching the ground. This is elite, game-changing speed. On top of that, Simpson has posted elite rates of contact. His slappy approach has held up so far, and he’s in the Steven Kwan/Luis Arraez territory in terms of his in-zone and overall metrics. Simpson doesn’t have the Jedi-level feel for contact that those two have, but he tracks pitches very well, he’s short to the ball, and he moves the barrel around the zone well. Aside from the occasional double down the third base line or into the gap, Simpson produces almost no power; his lone pro homer is an inside-the-parker. There is some risk that Simpson ends up producing on offense like Myles Straw or Nick Madrigal, who both also made a ton of contact in the minors. His spray chart looks like a left-handed version of those guys, but the combination of that handedness edge and Simpson’s elite speed gives him a dynamic that those high-contact-but-low-impact big leaguers lack.

The other key (but still developing) aspect of Simpson’s profile is his defense. A bad second base defender as an amateur, Simpson has moved to center field in pro ball. His feel for the position isn’t great, and his reads and routes can take him in a couple of different directions even on routine plays. But when Simpson hits the afterburners to go get a ball in the gap, you can see how his speed gives him a shot to be a special defender out there. His range in incredible, and Simpson has just over 140 career games in center field under his belt. There’s a chance he develops into a plus center field defender while also being a premium contact hitter with elite speed. Simpson is a unicorn of sorts and should be a dynamic, table-setting offensive player who also plays a premium position well.

Expand arrow_drop_down

73. Yilber Diaz, SP, ARI

Signed: International Signing Period, 2021 from Venezuela (ARI)
Age 24.5 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Command Sits/Tops
60/65 55/60 55/60 30/40 95-96 / 97

A supreme little athlete, Diaz has three plus pitches and demonstrated in 2024 that he could sustain upper-90s velocity across more than 100 innings. He should polish his command enough to be a mid-rotation starter at peak, and if he can’t, he’ll still be a really nasty late-inning reliever.

Diaz entered 2024 as arguably the best D-backs pitching prospect even though he didn’t obviously project as a starter. At the very least, the lightning-armed little righty seemed poised to race to the big leagues on the back of his plus stuff and play a meaningful late-season bullpen role for a contending club. This is largely what happened, but Diaz did a lot to solidify himself as a starting pitching prospect in our minds, mostly because of the way his breaking stuff looks like it will play against lefties. Diaz began 2024 at Double-A Amarillo, but pitched his way to Reno in June and then was called up to Arizona in July. He made four big league starts, went back to Reno for a month, and then returned to Phoenix in a long relief role in September. In total, he worked 132.2 innings across 28 games (23 starts), posting a 3.80 ERA, a 1.29 WHIP, 159 strikeouts and 59 walks. Diaz posted a 12% walk rate prior to his big league debut and then a very reasonable 8.7% the rest of the year. His fastball averaged 96 mph across the whole season and 97 mph when he was deployed in relief.

Though Diaz’s fastball command is spotty, its velocity, shape, and angle give it bat-missing margin for error in the strike zone, and it’s reasonable to hope that Diaz’s feel for repeating his high-octane delivery will continue to improve as he matures, and that his fastball command will follow. We now know that, even at his size, he’s capable of sustaining plus velocity across a lot of innings. His mid-80s slider and low-80s curveball each have vertically oriented movement and bat-missing depth. At times, the curve also has some arm-side action, which should help make it a platoon-neutralizing weapon and allow Diaz to navigate lefties without using a changeup. Ideally, Diaz will find a pitch with cutter-y glove-side movement at some point during his career just to give hitters a different direction to worry about, but what he’s working with now plays enough for him to profile as an inefficient, strikeout-heavy no. 4 starter. Over time, Diaz’s athleticism should facilitate polish in the areas that most need it and allow him to be a competitive team’s mid-rotation guy, the sort who you feel good handing the ball to in a playoff game.

Expand arrow_drop_down

74. Moisés Chace, SP, PHI

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2019 from Venezuela (BAL)
Age 21.7 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
70/80 45/55 30/45 30/45 93-96 / 97

Chace has a monster uphill fastball that should enable him to play a prominent role, even if his command doesn’t develop enough for him to start.

Chace has a high-octane arm and checks a bunch of different data and scouting boxes. He has a very athletic drop-and-drive delivery, his arm action breaks the sound barrier, and his heater has exploding life to the eye to go with mid-90s velocity. The data corroborates this: plus extension, low release height, plus vertical movement on his fastball. When Chace is locating his fastball to the belt, hitters have no chance against him. He looks like Bryce Miller did at roughly the same stage, a fastball-heavy 21-year-old of medium build. There is going to be a dominant fastball here, and there are flashes of good secondary stuff that ideally can be polished so Chace can max out, but like Joe Ryan and Miller, when guys have fastballs this good, they tend to pan out.

Chace’s slider flashes late, hitter-freezing, two-plane bend, but it doesn’t do so consistently. His changeup has, at times, ridiculous tailing action and can steal strikes running back over the glove-side corner of the plate, but again this is rare. His release is pretty inconsistent generally, which is totally normal for a 21-year-old with this kind of arm speed, but also creates some relief risk. The Phillies could pull the ripcord with this guy whenever they want and put him in the big league bullpen, and he’d probably be really good right away. Building his innings count by 20 frames or so (he threw 80.1 innings in 2024) in his first option year would tee up Chace to work something closer to a viable starter’s workload in 2026. Either way, unless his command regresses to 2022-23 levels, Chace’s fastball is going to carry him to an important big league role of some kind within the next two to three years.

Expand arrow_drop_down

75. Brody Hopkins, SP, TBR

Drafted: 6th Round, 2023 from Winthrop (SEA)
Age 23.1 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/60 55/60 40/50 40/55 30/40 93-97 / 99

Hopkins transferred from one small school to another and only began pitching in a serious way during his draft spring. A big-framed guy and exciting athlete, Hopkins’ stuff took a leap within his first year as a pro and he quickly became Seattle’s best pitching prospect before he was dealt for Randy Arozarena.

Hopkins is a converted outfielder who spent his first couple of collegiate seasons at the College of Charleston, where he didn’t pitch very much. It wasn’t until he transferred to Winthrop that he began to pitch regularly in a starter role, and he still managed to lead the Eagles in homers during his draft year even though Hopkins was becoming an “arrow up” prospect on the mound. A big-framed guy and exciting athlete, Hopkins’ stuff took a leap within his first year as a pro, and he quickly became Seattle’s best pitching prospect before he was traded to Tampa Bay as part of the Randy Arozarena deal and was promoted to High-A. Across both orgs he had a strong first full season — 115 IP in 25 starts, 10.41 K/9, 4.15 BB/9, 3.05 ERA — especially for a guy who was still hitting part of the time the prior season.

Hopkins has a low-slot slinger’s delivery akin to Tanner Houck or Camilo Doval. He’s a broad-shouldered 6-foot-4 and has a low-slot, drop-and-drive style, with his arm stroke happening suddenly at the very end of his delivery. This wreaks havoc on hitters’ timing and creates exploding rise-and-tail life up around the hands of righties. He has been up to 99 and, in his first year of focusing on pitching, threw a decent number of strikes. Obviously, with an arm slot like Hopkins’, his slider spells trouble for righties. This pitch has variable movement in the 86-92 mph range. Some of them look like cutters, while others have more length and depth.

It used to be that pitchers with deliveries like this were rarely found in a rotation, but that’s not really true anymore, and it’s becoming less true all the time. If Hopkins can develop a changeup and/or a well-commanded cutter, anything to flesh out his repertoire, he has a great chance to be a mid-rotation starter. He checks basically every athletic box on the scout card, and there are all kinds of late bloomer traits here. Pitching full-time is still very new to Hopkins and the Rays seemed to alter his style of attack after the trade, as he peppered the top of the zone more often. His groundball rate before the deal (59%) and after it (34%) help illustrate the effects of this. This is a very exciting pitching prospect whose floor feels like that of a nasty late-inning reliever. He has a mid-rotation ceiling if he sustains this velo and finds a third pitch.

Expand arrow_drop_down

76. Cole Young, SS, SEA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from North Allegheny HS (PA) (SEA)
Age 21.6 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 45/45 35/40 50/50 40/45 50

Young is a viable shortstop with above-average contact and on-base skills. His power might have been down in 2024 due to a wrist injury.

Young managed to slash .271/.369/.390 at Double-A Arkansas in 2024 even though it’s a pitcher-friendly environment and he was dealing with a nagging wrist issue, which cropped up again in his first and only Fall League game. His underlying exit velos from 2024 are pretty underwhelming, but they’re still just shy of the average among big league shortstops (his contact rates are comfortably above) and were probably impacted by his wrist.

Young does enough on defense to project as a viable shortstop. His hands and exchange are sound, while his arm strength is right on the fringe on what’s permissible on the left side. He’s performed on offense even as he and the Mariners have made changes to his swing, which now includes a lower load. Young also grinds out tough at-bats. He has great plate discipline, spoils tough two-strike pitches, and tends to put the ball in play even when he chases. If he shows up to camp healthy this spring, there’s a chance he grabs hold of the Mariners everyday second base job at some point in 2025. He’s a low-variance everyday middle infield prospect who is unlikely to be a star.

Expand arrow_drop_down

77. Jimmy Crooks, C, STL

Drafted: 4th Round, 2022 from Oklahoma (STL)
Age 23.6 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/45 50/50 40/45 20/20 50/60 60

Crooks is a glove-first catcher who does enough on offense to be the primary guy.

Crooks has been a consistently above-average offensive performer at each level since entering pro ball, culminating in a 2024 at Double-A in which he slashed a BABIP-aided .321/.410/.498. His underlying contact and power data is closer to average — 73% contact rate, 104 mph EV90 — though Crooks makes consistently hard contact. His batting stance evokes Luis Gonzalez, and Crooks tends to work the opposite way against pitches that aren’t hung breaking balls. It’s a solid offensive skill set for a catcher, and Crooks is a very good one. Basestealers should call Crooks “The Informant,” as he is not on their side no matter his last name, and while he has above-average arm strength, his accuracy is remarkable. So, too, is his ball-blocking. Crooks’ size helps create a flesh wall behind the plate, he ability to backhand balls in the dirt is great, and his strength makes him a good receiver. He’s tracking like a glove-first primary catcher with solid average offense.

Expand arrow_drop_down

78. Juan Brito, 2B, CLE

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2018 from Dominican Republic (COL)
Age 23.4 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 202 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/55 45/50 40/45 50/50 40/45 45

Brito is a contact-oriented switch-hitter who has improved enough as a defender to play second base at the big league level. His profile is more about floor than ceiling.

Brito was a 2023 Pick to Click who looked too rough around the edges on defense that year to justify putting in last year’s Top 100. In 2024, as Brito slashed .256/.365/.443 (.320 xwOBA, per Baseball Savant), his defense improved enough to consider him a viable second base defender. Primarily a middle infielder in Colorado’s org before coming to Cleveland as part of the Nolan Jones trade, the Guardians also tried Brito at third base in 2023, and then at a first base and in right field in 2024. It’s not as though Brito is suddenly a Gold Glove second baseman, but he’s consistent enough to play there in big league games, and he’s backed into having uncommon defensive versatility.

Brito’s offensive skill set hovers around average across the board. He has good bat control and some low-ball power from both sides of the plate, though his swing has more consistent lift as a left-handed hitter. Brito hunts fastballs so fastidiously that he tends to chase them, but his bat control allows him to get away with it. Overall, Brito’s contact and power metrics are right in line with the big league average among second basemen. He’s a platoon-neutral player who can hit from both sides of the dish, and now he’s viable at an up-the-middle position, and likely will be at one or two others soon. With Andrés Giménez gone, Brito has a shot to win Cleveland’s everyday second base job.

Expand arrow_drop_down

79. Cade Horton, SP, CHC

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from Oklahoma (CHC)
Age 23.5 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 211 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/45 60/70 50/50 50/60 40/50 92-95 / 97

Horton’s fastball velo trended down to an average level before he was shut down with a shoulder injury in late May of 2024. His slider and changeup quality continue to drive his mid-rotation projection.

Horton was a draft-eligible sophomore who was seen as a “tip of the iceberg” prospect, as he missed his freshman year due to TJ and didn’t focus solely on pitching until pro ball. It seemed as though things were clicking for him at a different level toward the end of the 2022 college season, and the Cubs were emboldened to select him seventh overall that year. In his 2023 pro debut, Horton posted a .996 WHIP across 88.1 innings, reaching Double-A and sustaining the velocity surge he showed during his breakout junior year despite throwing more innings. That didn’t continue in 2024, as Horton’s velo backed up and was more in the 92-95 range before he was shut down with a shoulder strain in late May after just nine starts. He missed the rest of the season and was re-examined during the offseason to see if he was ready to begin a throwing program. His status for the start of 2025 is up in the air.

Horton’s delivery is fairly violent and indeed looks tough on his shoulder. Other aspects of his fastball are unexceptional, so it’s important for Horton to throw hard for that pitch to be effective. His secondary pitches are what drive his mid-rotation projection here. Horton’s slider and changeup both generate plus-plus rates of miss. His slider has rare velocity and two-plane tilt (it’s a weapon against both left- and right-handed hitters), and his screwball changeup gives him another way to get lefties out. Horton will probably work inefficiently as a starter unless his peak velocity returns, and will have to pitch off his secondary stuff a ton. He’s still likely to be an impact pitcher, but suddenly his list of career arm maladies has grown, forcing Horton toward the back of the overall Top 100.

Expand arrow_drop_down

80. Troy Melton, SP, DET

Drafted: 4th Round, 2022 from San Diego State (DET)
Age 24.2 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/50 50/60 45/50 94-97 / 98

Melton is a big, strong righty with an impact fastball and secondary stuff that is still emerging as he gets feel for a relatively new delivery.

Melton was one of the youngest college prospects in the 2021 draft as well as a plus on-mound athlete, so when he had a really rough season with an ERA just over 6.00, it was easier to swallow a return to San Diego State. In his fourth year as an Aztec, Melton reworked his arm action and climbed into the fourth round of the 2022 draft.

Melton and the Tigers have continued to make substantial alterations to his stuff, and he has had both bat-missing and strike-throwing success up through Double-A. In 2024, he was generating six feet, 10 inches of extension and sitting 95-97 mph with plus vertical movement from a low release height across 100.2 innings of work. Melton has added roughly five ticks of velocity to his breaking ball since college, and his splinker-style changeup (often mis-classified by automatic pitch tagging) generated plus chase and miss.

Melton is a strapping 6-foot-4, he throws strikes, and he has two plus pitches and several late-bloomer traits. He was young for his graduating class, was mostly a catcher in high school, missed a season due to the pandemic, and now has a fairly new delivery and breaking ball. He was homer-prone in 2024 (20% HR/FB rate), which is a big part of why he carried an elevated ERA, but that’s an unsustainably high rate. Melton was also shut down with a shoulder impingement at the very end of the 2024 season, but he was hitting 98 in a bullpen just before Top 100 publication and seems fine. He’s on pace to debut at some point late in 2025 and compete for a more permanent spot in the middle of Detroit’s stacked rotation in 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

81. Jefferson Rojas, SS, CHC

Signed: International Signing Period, 2022 from Dominican Republic (CHC)
Age 19.8 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/50 40/50 25/50 45/45 30/45 50

Rojas is a young middle infield prospect with a great looking swing. He has terrific underlying data, but has struggled against high fastballs.

Rojas hit so well during 2023 extended spring training that the Cubs sent him to Low-A before the complex-level season had barely began. He hit .268/.345/.404 in 70 games there, and the Cubs sent him straight to High-A South Bend when camp broke in 2024. There Rojas slashed .245/.310/.336 as 19-year-old. He has gorgeous hitting hands, great rhythm and timing, and advanced feel for all-fields contact. Though Rojas’ granular contact data is very strong (he had a 90% in-zone rate in 2024, for instance, which is great), there are very clearly two ways to get him out: backfoot breaking balls and elevated fastballs. He is very likely to require eventual adjustment to deal with at least one of them. He’s still a very exciting offensive prospect, especially for a shortstop, there is just less certainty in this aspect of his prospectdom.

Rojas has the athleticism, range, and actions to project as a viable shortstop, but he needs polish, as you might expect of a teenage shortstop playing a level above what is typical. Rojas’ internal clock is a little slow and he struggles with short hops right now, but the foundation to stay at short is there. He still has an everyday shortstop projection, it’s just a riskier version of it than was previously considered here. His medium frame means he’s unlikely to develop huge power — this guy doesn’t have Elly De La Cruz’s ceiling or anything like that — but he has the talent of an average regular via a blend of contact, power and average shortstop defense. Rojas was initially graded as a 45+ FV on the Cubs list, but as the entire player population was considered, it felt more appropriate that end slot in this area on the Top 100.

Expand arrow_drop_down

82. Arjun Nimmala, SS, TOR

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Strawberry Crest HS (FL) (TOR)
Age 19.3 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/40 55/70 25/60 45/40 30/45 50

Nimmala made swing tweaks in the middle of 2024 and hit for impressive power afterward. He’s a big guy, but he has a shot to stay at shortstop.

Nimmala was one of the youngest prospects in the 2023 draft and also one of the most projectable, both because of his big, broad-shouldered frame and because he’s new enough to baseball to merit deeper, skill-centric projection. He struggled mightily with breaking ball recognition as an amateur, and at his size, it seemed feasible that he might also need to move off of shortstop.

In 2024, Nimmala had his ass handed to him during the first several weeks of the season. He was hitting .167 in the middle of May and was demoted to the complex, where his swing was re-worked. It seems to have made a real difference. Nimmala’s leg kick and the position of his hands as they load were both altered. When he returned to the Dunedin roster, he hit .265/.331/.564 and stroked 13 bombs in his final 53 games.

This isn’t to say Nimmala is suddenly a lock to be an everyday infielder. He still struck out 29.7% of the time during his hot second half of the season, which is a scary rate at Low-A. His overall contact rate (69%) also wasn’t great, but there is at least precedent for power-hitting big leaguers to carry a rate that low and still be impact players. Nimmala already hits the ball very hard. He is a ferocious rotator and is able to generate considerable power because of the strength and quickness of his hitting hands, which are gigantic. Nimmala is able to create big power in a relatively short distance, and his swing isn’t overly noisy or hard to maintain. He’s also elevating the baseball at an Andy Pages-esque 21 degrees of launch on average, and he’s often on time to pull the baseball thanks to a strong top hand through contact. Toward the end of the year, Arjun showed glimpses of being able to cover the outer third and drive the ball to the opposite field gap with power.

Nimmala is also a terrific bender for his size and has a shot to remain at shortstop. That said, his feel for throwing isn’t great, his body doesn’t always sequence well from the ground up, and his mechanics can get out of whack. He needs to work on more consistently transferring his weight from one foot to the other, which he badly struggles with on backhand plays. The tools to be an impact power-hitting shortstop are here, and Nimmala will be 19 for basically all of 2025. He was always going to be a slower burn, and now he’s shown that he can pretty quickly make relevant adjustments.

Expand arrow_drop_down

83. Thomas White, SP, MIA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Phillips Academy (MA) (MIA)
Age 20.4 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/60 55/60 40/50 30/50 94-96 / 97

White is a big-framed lefty with mid-90s heat and a plus breaking ball.

As an underclassman, White was sitting in the low-90s, with a snapdragon breaking ball and a great physical foundation on which to layer velocity. He unleashed even more heat at PG National in 2022 (lots of 93-96 mph) and then shut things down for the bulk of showcase season. Leading up to the 2023 draft, White looked more muscular and mature in the body and held mid-90s velocity throughout the spring, albeit under a very conservative workload. The Marlins gave him just over $4 million as one of two first-round prep arms taken that year, the second straight draft where Miami coaxed a high school pitcher away from Vanderbilt. In 2024, White’s first full season, he carried a 2.81 ERA across 21 starts, mostly at High-A. He worked 96 innings and K’d 29.2% of opposing hitters while keeping his walks mostly under control. The strike-throwing aspect of White’s 2024 season is the chief reason he moved into the 100, after that had been a concern while he was an amateur. His fastball averaged 95 mph across the entire season, his curveball morphed into more of a sweeper (which helped it play as a back foot weapon against righties), and while White’s changeup doesn’t have great movement right now, his feel for locating it is pretty good considering he barely had to use it in high school. He’s in the early stages of charting a mid-rotation course.

Expand arrow_drop_down

84. Travis Sykora, SP, WSN

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2023 from Round Rock HS (TX) (WSN)
Age 20.8 Height 6′ 6″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Splitter Command Sits/Tops
55/55 55/60 50/60 30/50 93-97 / 98

Sykora had a dominant first pro season thanks to his plus velocity, splitter, and advanced control.

As I noted on last year’s Nationals list, you can’t help but malaprop Sykora into “Sequoia,” because at 6-foot-6 and 230 pounds, Travis is the size of a tree. He overpowered high school hitters with a downhill, upper-90s fastball and promising split changeup as an amateur, and the Nationals gave him $2.6 million in the third round of the 2023 draft. Sykora made 20 excellent Low-A starts during his pro debut in 2024. In 85 innings, he posted a 2.33 ERA, a 1.87 FIP, a 39.2% strikeout rate (yow), and a 8.2% walk rate.

Sykora has a low-three-quarters arm slot, but his front side stays tall throughout his delivery. It’s a funky operation that gives him the option of running a two-seamer down toward his arm-side or elevating his fastball at the belt. Sykora did much more of the latter in 2024 while he held mid-90s velo all year. Even as a high schooler, his fastball command was fairly advanced for a pitcher his size and age, but a 8% walk rate in a 6-foot-6 guy’s debut season is even better than one could have hoped for. Sykora’s slider, which doesn’t spin very much but is aided by its natural downhill trajectory, gives him the means to attack east and west off his fastball, while his splitter combines with the elevated version of Sykora’s heater to attack north and south. The direction of the splitter’s movement has been all over the place since Sykora was in high school. At times it can look like a slider, and something about its inconsistency plays mind games with hitters. Both of his secondary pitches generated miss rates north of 50% last year. Just before the Top 100 was published, Mike Rizzo told reporters that Sykora will be out until close to the middle of the 2025 season; he had a hip procedure during the offseason and will start the year in extended spring training. It didn’t impact his grade here, and so long as Sykora’s stuff looks the same when he returns, he’ll still have mid-rotation projection.

Expand arrow_drop_down

85. Felnin Celesten, 2B, SEA

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Dominican Republic (SEA)
Age 19.4 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/45 50/60 20/55 50/40 35/50 60

Celesten is a physical, switch-hitting middle infield prospect who hasn’t played much due to injury.

The early portion of Celesten’s career has been defined by injury. He suffered a hamstring tear before the 2023 DSL season began, an injury that basically cost him the entire season except for a couple of games in Arizona during Fall Instructional League. Then his season was cut short in 2024 when a slide aggravated a wrist issue that had been bothering Celesten on and off for a while. He had surgery and has now only played in 32 actual games as a pro, though he was also scouted a ton during 2024 extended spring training. In those 32 games, Celesten slashed an amazing .352/.431/.568 and produced a 48% hard-hit rate even though his wrist was hurting. Celesten’s physicality stands out immediately and would stand out in a big league clubhouse. He probably weighs 15 or 20 pounds more than when he signed, and every bit of it is muscle; Celesten’s shoulders look like he stuffed grapefruits up his sleeves. This allows him to make a remarkable amount of hard contact with an easy, low-effort swing.

Celesten’s left-handed swing has a beautifully balanced leg kick that takes advantage of his athleticism without getting out of control. His load from that side is pretty aggressive and deep, with the head of the bat tilted toward the pitcher as he prepares to unwind. You can see in the way Celesten’s lower body, hips, and wrists rotate throughout his swing that this is a pretty special and powerful athlete. His swing is currently geared for low-ball contact, and he’s going to be tested by belt-high fastballs as he climbs further up the full-season ladder, but if this guy ever learns how to alter the posture of his body as a means of covering the top of the zone so that his hands can continue to work with their natural loft, he’s going to be a problem. His right-handed swing is nowhere near as authoritative and is often late, but you can see the athletic elements of his cut from that side, too. Celesten’s swing is not actualized for lift just yet — he averaged just two degrees of launch in a small enough sample that it probably isn’t exactly right to say he’s a two degree guy, but he hits a ton of grounders, to be sure.

On defense, I’ve shifted my forecast for Celesten to second base. He was running in the 4.4s from the right side and the 4.3s from the left for me during the spring (I had no ACL run times from him because his contact quality has been too good for him to ever have to run hard), and I also think Celesten’s size at maturity will be bigger than the typical shortstop’s. Hopefully Celesten will stay healthy enough to have a full season at Modesto. He’s still a risky prospect because he simply hasn’t played very much, but his absolute ceiling would give the org something of a Ketel Marte do over.

Expand arrow_drop_down

86. Tre’ Morgan, 1B, TBR

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2023 from LSU (TBR)
Age 22.6 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 45/45 30/40 50/50 70/80 50

Morgan’s lack of power relative to other first basemen is countered by his incredible defensive ability.

Morgan was the Eric Hosmer of college baseball for his three years at LSU, playing slick first base defense while bringing a competitive edge and moxy to Baton Rouge. He didn’t produce anything close to the typical in-game power output of a big league first baseman, in part because his bat path caused him to drive the ball into the ground fairly often, à la Hosmer. In pro ball, Morgan’s swing and approach have changed pretty dramatically a couple of times already, and he has also begun using a bat with a counterweighted knob.

During the 2024 regular season, it looked like Morgan was more often taking max-effort swings and selling out for power. He reached Double-A and slugged .483 across three levels, but his middling raw strength and opposite-field tendency as a hitter (plus elevated chase rates relative to his career norms) suggested this was maybe not the best approach for him. In the Fall League, Morgan was more balanced, taking enormous hacks only in favorable counts. He was still stinging the ball in a way that indicates he’ll be a doubles machine, and he seemed less vulnerable to fastballs up and away than he did during the summer. We don’t have a way of truly knowing how Morgan will handle elevated big league fastballs until he faces them, but a more balanced, contact-oriented style of hitting is going to give him a much better chance of covering the top of the zone and being a more complete hitter.

What really tipped Morgan into the Top 100, though, is his defense. He does the splits at first base as easily as I change the channel from the CBS NFL game to the FOX game during commercials. He is at least the best first base defender I’ve seen in person since young Cody Bellinger, and maybe the best I’ve ever seen there, period. He looks bad in the outfield and shouldn’t play there. Morgan will produce like a second-division regular on offense, but he’ll make the whole infield better because of his ability to erase their mistakes on defense.

Expand arrow_drop_down

87. Starlyn Caba, SS, MIA

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Dominican Republic (PHI)
Age 19.2 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 160 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/70 30/40 20/30 60/60 45/80 60

Caba is special defender who has produced special contact rates in the lower minors. He is unlikely to hit for much power.

The primary return from the Phillies in the Jesús Luzardo trade, Caba has a chance to be the best shortstop defender in all of baseball at maturity. He is an unbelievable athlete with ridiculous body control and range, and a big arm for a 5-foot-9 guy. He’ll make the occasional overzealous throw that misses first base entirely, but he is otherwise a complete and sensational shortstop. Despite his age, he is basically a lock to be a special defensive player at arguably the most important position on the field.

Caba has also shown great plate discipline and contact ability in the lower minors. He’s a career .252/.398/.304 hitter across two minor league seasons and spent the last six weeks of 2024 at Low-A Clearwater while he was still just 18 years old. That line is underwhelming more due to the lack of power than anything else. Caba has accumulated many more walks than strikeouts during that span, and his granular contact data (5% swinging strike rate, 93% in-zone contact, 87% overall) is exceptional, especially for such a young switch-hitter. He might not have a huge offensive ceiling, however. Caba is four inches shorter than Zach Neto and his bat speed is only fair. There isn’t going to be big power here; in fact, it’s possible Caba’s lack of power will dilute the performance of his on-base and contact skills somewhat — he tends to keep infielders busy. A career similar to that of Jose Iglesias is fair to hope for Caba, while Andrelton Simmons (who had a more meaningful power peak) feels like the absolute ceiling.

Expand arrow_drop_down

88. Welbyn Francisca, 2B, CLE

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Dominican Republic (CLE)
Age 18.8 Height 5′ 9″ Weight 165 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/60 30/45 20/40 60/60 30/50 40

Francisca is a twitchy little bat-to-ball prodigy whose long-term defensive fit is probably second base.

Francisca is a compact, switch-hitting bat control prodigy who signed for $1.3 million in 2023. He hit his way from the Goodyear complex to Low-A in 2024 and, combined, slashed .326/.411/.474. He’s a fantastic athlete who has rare ball-striking power for an athlete of his size and age, capable of turning on low pitches with power and taking what is given in other parts of the zone. For Francisca to have such advanced barrel feel as such a young switch-hitter is very exciting.

Limited arm strength and range will likely limit Welbyn to second base over the long haul. He plays defense with a ton of effort, but he too often makes routine plays look spectacular out of necessity. Francisca’s swing is explosive enough that, despite being a tad undersized, I think he’ll eventually have enough power to profile as a first-division second baseman.

Expand arrow_drop_down

89. Jedixson Paez, SP, BOS

Signed: International Signing Period, 2021 from Venezuela (BOS)
Age 21.1 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
35/40 55/60 55/60 45/80 90-92 / 93

Paez is a command artist with plus secondary stuff.

Paez is among the most entertaining pitchers in the minors, a whippy-armed lower slot guy with an incredibly fast arm action and great secondary stuff. The undersized, low-three-quarters righty began his pro career as a sinker merchant with precocious command, then in 2024, his secondary pitches and velocity both took a meaningful leap compared to 2023 and Paez retained his incredible command in the process. As a 20-year-old swingman working up to five innings per outing, Paez pitched 96.2 innings and posted a 10.52 K/9, 1.12 BB/9, and 3.17 ERA at (mostly) High-A.

Paez’s athleticism is evident in his delivery and in some of his data. He’s a wispy 6-foot-1 but generates six feet, nine inches of extension because of his enormous hop down the mound. For all of the effort with which Paez throws, he doesn’t miss his spot very often. He’ll bury his sinker in locations that make it impossible to elevate, run it back over the corner of the plate for a strike, use it to set up his excellent changeup with precise arm-side location, and occasionally run his heater up the ladder, where it can slip past certain hitters’ bats because of its angle. Paez’s slider, which spins it at 2,700-2,800 rpm on average, was four ticks harder in 2024 than in 2023, and averaged 82 mph. His ability to attack with lateral fastball/slider divergence and then pull the string with his changeup is very advanced. He might also have an uphill cutter at maturity to give hitters one more glove-side pitch to worry about.

Paez is a great athlete but he doesn’t have a great frame. He’s smaller than most starters, and he can be slow getting off the mound to field his position, which is a mandatory part of any sinker baller’s skill set. But he’s also one of the few pitchers in the minors who, statistically and visually, looks like he has a chance to develop elite command. The 2025 season is his 40-man platform year, putting him on pace to get his feet wet at the big league level as a spot starter in 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

90. Edgar Quero, C, CHW

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2021 from Cuba (LAA)
Age 21.9 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr S / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/50 45/50 40/50 30/30 40/45 45

Quero is a bat-first catching prospect who has performed as a young-for-the-level hitter.

Part of the 2023 Lucas Giolito trade with the Angels, Quero is a switch-hitting bat-first catcher who has had success as a young-for-the-level hitter at each minor league stop, including Triple-A at the end of 2024. He lacks a plus tool, but he’s a well-rounded hitter and a viable up-the-middle defender. It’s particularly difficult to sneak one by Quero when he’s hitting righty, as his swing is short and flat, which helps him make plus rates of contact from that side of the plate. He has more power as a lefty and is adept at dropping the bat head to make low-ball contact.

Quero’s defense is less mature, and his unexceptional athleticism is evident in this part of his game, which is currently below-average (but not awful) across the board. He has below-average pure arm strength, but has posted a 25% CS% rate (basically average) the last couple of seasons thanks to his accuracy. Keep in mind that while Quero has been around for a bit and has been a fringy defender for much of that time, he’s been pushed through the minors aggressively and has been catching upper-level arms at age 20 and 21 the last couple of seasons.

The presence of Kyle Teel and Korey Lee in the org clouds Quero’s future somewhat because he is the worst defender of that group and therefore the one most likely to move off the position. It’s possible Lee won’t hit enough for this to matter, and that a year or two from now Quero and Teel will be one of the more potent young catching tandems in the league. The White Sox still have at least a year for this stuff to sort itself out before they have to make any kind of actual roster decisions related to this potential logjam. Quero is on track to be added to the 40-man this offseason, while Teel’s chalk 40-man timeline is for post-2026, though his promotion pace has tracked ahead of that. Though he probably won’t be a star, Quero is a well-rounded young hitter who should hit enough to be in the lineup every day, even if half the time he’s a first baseman or DH.

Expand arrow_drop_down

91. Edgardo Henriquez, SIRP, LAD

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2018 from Venezuela (LAD)
Age 22.6 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Command Sits/Tops
70/80 60/70 30/40 97-99 / 102

If you’re looking for the next Mason Miller, Henriquez is an outstanding candidate.

If you’re looking for a Mason Miller character in this year’s prospect crop, Henriquez is probably your guy. He’s an ideally built 22-year-old who throws 100, it’s just that Henriquez’s body and arm are too explosive for him to control right now. He missed 2023 recovering from TJ and was put in the bullpen after just five Low-A starts early in 2024. He raced through the minors as a reliever and debuted in late September, but he struggled with walks (just shy of 13% on the year).

At some point things are going to click for Henriquez and he’s going to be a dominant closer. He touched 102 last season and sat 98-99. Automatic pitch tagging thinks Henriquez’s slider is a cutter, in part because it’s so hard (it’ll touch 94) and in part because Henriquez doesn’t locate it to his glove side consistently enough for it to have long, slider-y movement. When he does snap off a good one, it has incredible two-plane movement and depth for a pitch traveling nearly 90 mph most of the time. Days after the Dodgers’ World Series parade, Henriquez was bundled up at an Arizona Fall League game, just to hang out and watch baseball. I like that. He’s immensely talented, he’s been to The Show already, and it wouldn’t surprise me if he’s the Dodgers’ best reliever at some point in the next year or two, and then beyond.

Expand arrow_drop_down

92. Tai Peete, CF, SEA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Trinity Christian HS (GA) (SEA)
Age 19.5 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 193 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/40 50/60 25/60 55/55 30/50 60

Peete is a lanky power projection bat who began a transition from shortstop to center field in 2024.

Peete was a 2024 Pick to Click who has clicked for an unexpected reason: It looks like he’s going to make a successful transition to center field. A high school shortstop whose size likely would have been a prohibitive long-term factor at that position, Peete was error-prone at short in 2024 and, in the middle of the season, the Mariners shifted him to the outfield on a part-time basis. It’s not as if Peete instantly became Kevin Kiermaier out there, but his first step and range were surprisingly good. Like Lourdes Gurriel Jr., Peete has taken some of his infielder skills out there with him, and his exchange on throws is uncommonly quick. Unsurprisingly, his routes need some polish, but Peete boldly made some spectacular plays out there last season. He’s already better in the outfield than he is at short, where errors of all sorts were common for him in 2024. Part of me wants Peete to keep playing some infield, if only so that he keeps having opportunities to handle the baseball as much as possible as a way of improving his hands, but part of me wants to see the Mariners commit to the center field thing full-time.

Of course, the reason I thought Peete would break out in 2024 is because of his immense, frame-driven power potential. He has an ideal baseball player’s build at a broad-shouldered 6-foot-2, and he put on an absolute show during BP at the 2023 Combine. He came to pro ball with hit tool risk, and that still exists. He posted a 67% contact rate in 2024 and still struggles to cover the outer third of the zone because of how early his front side drifts open. But despite Peete’s lever length, he’s often on time to pull. It’s kind of amazing how often he’s able to snatch pitches riding in on his hands, and he showed glimpses last year of being able to bend at the waist so that he can cover that outer edge with power. He’s still growing into his body and should add more raw juice as he matures. He made the 100 more on upside than certainly, as he has a shot to be a 25-homer center fielder.

Expand arrow_drop_down

93. George Klassen, SP, LAA

Drafted: 6th Round, 2023 from Minnesota (PHI)
Age 23.1 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/70 60/60 50/60 30/40 96-98 / 101

Klassen developed from a hard-throwing sideshow into a high-upside starter in about a year under the Phillies’ tutelage prior to the Carlos Estévez trade. He’s still really wild, but now he has three plus pitches and an impact relief floor.

Klassen developed from a hard-throwing sideshow into a high-upside mid-minors starter in about a year under the Phillies’ tutelage, then was traded to the Angels as part of the Carlos Estévez deal. He walked nearly a batter per inning in his draft year at Minnesota, but coasted through A-ball with fewer free passes in his first pro season. Klassen had a sub-1.00 WHIP when he was traded to Anaheim, and improved his control while also adding a cutter and polishing his curveball. Still, his walk rate exploded after the Angels acquired him, and chances are that he is going to be a reliever in the end.

Klassen is a super whippy and bouncy athlete who generates huge arm speed. His delivery requires a ton of effort and violence to produce upper-90s heat, and he throws a lot of non-competitive pitches. But improving his breaking stuff (his power curveball is now comfortably plus) and adding a third pitch (his 90-92 mph cutter probably eventually will be, too) is a huge one-year leap for Klassen to have made when there were times in his draft spring when he looked absolutely awful. Klassen has mid-rotation upside if he can hone his command and is a late-inning relief fit if he can’t. His rapid progression in this area is encouraging and, even if it doesn’t continue, he’s going to be an impact arm of some kind. It’s fine to value him toward the back of the Top 100.

Expand arrow_drop_down

94. Grant Taylor, SP, CHW

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2023 from LSU (CHW)
Age 22.7 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 230 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/60 45/50 45/60 30/40 94-98 / 99

Taylor returned from injury in 2024 and his impact fastball did, too. He has a burgeoning four-pitch mix that includes a new changeup.

Some readers might recall that the fall prior to their draft year, it was Taylor who was slated to be LSU’s Friday night guy the following spring, while Paul Skenes, fresh from the transfer portal, was the team’s presumptive number two. A draft-eligible sophomore, Taylor blew out and needed Tommy John right before the start of the 2023 collegiate season and, as a result of his injury and a meager statistical track record that included just one walk-prone season, he fell to the second round of that year’s draft.

Taylor was only able to squeeze in 19.1 innings during the 2024 regular season once he was finished rehabbing, and came to the Arizona Fall League to pick up reps. At times he looked great there, flashing four average or better pitches, including a plus-flashing changeup that wasn’t part of Taylor’s college repertoire at all. Taylor sat 96-98 range early in outings and 94-98 overall. His fastball has vertical shape and plus ride, which pairs nicely with the shape of a 83-ish mph curveball that has fair depth but often lacks bite. Taylor’s 84-90 mph slider and 87-89 mph changeup are his two nastier secondary pitches. Breaking ball consistency will be key for Taylor moving forward. His slider’s finish is inconsistent, but when it’s right, it’s plus at that velocity. His changeup is going to give him a weapon to neutralize lefties that’s better than his curveball; the bottom falls out of it just as it reaches the plate, but again, it’s a brand new piece of Taylor’s repertoire. Much of Taylor’s profile is risky. For one, we don’t know whether he’ll be able to sustain plus velocity across a starter’s workload yet. But he has the makings of at least three plus pitches and the ceiling of mid-rotation starter.

Expand arrow_drop_down

95. Carson Whisenhunt, SP, SFG

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2022 from East Carolina (SFG)
Age 24.3 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 209 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/45 50/50 80/80 40/45 92-94 / 96

Whisenhunt’s changeup is very special.

What kind of role can Whisenhunt’s all-world changeup carry him to if the rest of his skill set is just okay? Though Whisenhunt has improved in a few key areas, his strike-throwing is still on the fringe of what tends to be viable for a big league starter. His walk rate improved quite a bit in the second half of 2024 (from 12.3% to 9.8%) but was still worse than all but eight major league starters who worked at least 120 innings last year.

There are other encouraging signs here, though. Whisenhunt held his usual velocity all year even though he exceeded the 100-inning threshold for the first time. He had previously only peaked around 60 innings, first as a college sophomore and then again in an injury-shortened 2023. Whisenhunt’s breaking ball, which was once a flaccid curveball, is now a serviceable 82-85 mph slider. Most importantly, he has an elite pitch. His changeup is good in any count — hitters can know it’s coming and still be fooled by it. It has generated elite miss rates for multiple seasons, including against Triple-A hitters in 2024. A Devin Williams type of outcome would be plausible for Whisenhunt should he prove unable to start. He stands a good shot to debut late in 2025 and compete for an Opening Day roster spot in 2026.

Expand arrow_drop_down

96. Luis Morales, SP, ATH

Signed: International Signing Period, 2023 from Cuba (OAK)
Age 22.4 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/70 55/60 35/55 30/45 96-98 / 100

The way Morales is built and moves is way different than most other prospects and gives him enormous theoretical ceiling, but to say he’s undercooked as a pitching craftsman would be an understatement.

The A’s frequently have late-market bonus pool space left to target Asian and Cuban players in the international amateur space, and that enabled them to sign Morales, who they inked for a whopping $3 million. Morales began his A’s career in the DSL, but he was so dominant that he was sent to Arizona after just four outings and ended the 2023 season at High-A Lansing having pitched across four different levels. Morales began 2024 in extended spring training with a shoulder impingement before he was sent out at the very end of April. He ended up working 81 innings across 22 starts at High-A Lansing and posted a 4.22 ERA, 24.9% strikeout rate, and 10.7% walk rate. Morales continues to look like an absolutely electric athlete with all-world arm speed, but he’s still more a thrower than pitcher.

The raw material Morales brings to the table is exceptional. He has an ideal pitcher’s frame: a broad-shouldered 6-foot-3, tapered at the waist, with oodles of physical projection, like a young Zack Wheeler. His arm speed looks like it should break the sound barrier and produces easy, upper-90s cheese. Morales also has a hellacious two-plane curveball in the 81-84 mph range, and you can go wild projecting on his changeup because of his athleticism and arm speed.

But Morales’ pitchability and on-mound poise need to improve. He works at a breakneck pace that often feels counter productive. He gets the sign from his catcher and lets it rip; he doesn’t seem to be executing any kind of plan or competent sequencing, and his command is pretty scattered. Morales and the A’s have plenty of time to develop his feel for these things, as his 40-man timeline doesn’t start until after the 2026 season.

Morales has this grade and a reservation on the Top 100 ranking because of his upside, which is considerable. He looks and moves like a top-of-the-rotation starter, and his stuff gives him a late-inning relief floor if he only barely develops as a strike-thrower. Were he a college prospect, Morales would be a top five pick (give or take) in most drafts because of his raw ability. Oakland’s track record of optimizing pitchers isn’t the best, but scouting and predicting aren’t the same thing. Morales isn’t racing to the big leagues and is definitely more of a Las Vegas A’s prospect than a Sacramento A’s prospect, one who will probably spend most of the next couple of years trying to grow and improve as a craftsman. He has a shot to become an All-Star starter down the road.

Expand arrow_drop_down

97. Noble Meyer, SP, MIA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Jesuit HS (OR) (MIA)
Age 20.1 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/60 50/60 50/60 20/50 92-95 / 97

Meyer had a walk-prone 2024 season, but still has great stuff and long-term physical projection.

Ah yes, high school pitchers. Aren’t they fun? Meyer hasn’t had anything close to his peak high school velocity so far in pro ball, as he sat mostly in the low-90s throughout the 2024 season and struggled badly with walks. Despite this, he was still really hard to hit, and he surrendered just 42 knocks in his 74 innings. I’d argue it’s encouraging that even though Meyer’s velocity was down from its mid-to-upper-90s peak, nobody could touch his stuff when it was in the zone. Meyer checks nearly every scouting and analytical box. His 6-foot-5 frame is lanky and projectable, his arm works loose and free, he has a lower-than-average release height, and he can create huge action on his secondary pitches. All of these things were still true of Meyer in 2024. His slider and changeup still flashed plus, and he presents a very exciting physical package. Obviously, how Meyer looks in his second full season will be important, but for now, I think it’s fair to chalk up his 2024 to the grind and rigors of a pro season, which are simply much different than what the young man experienced in high school.

Expand arrow_drop_down

98. Xavier Isaac, 1B, TBR

Drafted: 1st Round, 2022 from East Forsyth HS (NC) (TBR)
Age 21.2 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 240 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/30 70/80 40/70 40/40 30/45 40

Isaac has elite raw power projection, but probably needs a swing change to make enough contact for it to matter.

Isaac has some of the most exciting power in pro baseball. A formerly pudgy high school first baseman, Isaac completely reshaped his body, and in a 2023 season spent mostly at Low-A became one of the more exciting power-hitting prospects in the sport, as he slugged .521, posted elite peak exit velocities, and struck out at a very reasonable 21.2% clip as a 19-year-old. Isaac had some underlying swing-and-miss issues (a 68% contact rate, lower than all but a couple of big league first basemen), but the guys who succeed in spite of this (the Bryce Harper, Brent Rooker, Kyle Schwarber types) all do so with gargantuan power, which Isaac has.

Isaac broke camp with the High-A Bowling Green squad in 2024, and was running a 69% contact rate through May before he completely collapsed. By the end of the season, he had a sub-60% contact rate, which is not viable at the big league level. Isaac was getting absolutely worked by pitches in on his hands. His swing is just too long for him to get the bat to that location, and this issue will only get worse as Isaac faces upper-level pitchers who throw harder. There has to be intervention and adjustment here to get Isaac to shorten up or he won’t hit enough to be a big leaguer. His raw power, however, is elite. This is a 21-year-old with 40-homer power who has already made one significant change (his conditioning) as a pro. If Isaac — who has other hitterish elements in his ability to make in-flight adjustments to breaking balls and power fastballs away from him to left field — can get back to being a nearly 70% contact hitter, he’s going to be a monster. Even if he can just get into the 65%-ish area, he’ll be able to have a Chris Carter-type career. This grade is more about valuing Isaac’s ceiling than it is a representation of his current skills. He’s Schrödinger’s Cleanup Hitter whose early-2025 mechanical look is a very important thing to monitor.

Expand arrow_drop_down

99. Jeferson Quero, C, MIL

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2019 from Venezuela (MIL)
Age 22.4 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 50/60 40/55 40/40 40/50 70

Quero has some approach risk akin to Jorge Alfaro, but is otherwise an exciting primary catcher prospect with pull power and a great arm. He’s returning from injury in 2025.

Quero suffered a torn right labrum diving back to first base in the very first game of the 2024 minor league season and missed the whole year. He was coming off a 2023 spent at Double-A Biloxi during which he slashed .262/.339/.440, doubled his career home run total with 16 bombs, upped his previously concerning walk rate to 10%, and earned a 40-man roster spot. The labrum issue puts Quero’s impact arm strength at risk, and we won’t know that it’s still there until we see him throw again in 2025. He has an ultra-short arm action and was often popping around 1.80 at the end of 2023. The other aspects of Quero’s defense need work. He often gets caught in between wanting to block or backhand pitches in the dirt to his right, and Quero is a fairly noisy pitch framer, but overall he’s much more advanced than most catchers his age and he probably would have been fine had the Brewers needed him at some point in 2024.

Quero has a power-over-hit offensive profile and will take some hellacious and wild swings. He gets right on top of the plate and is looking to pull. This approach can leave him vulnerable to stuff on the outer edge, which he sometimes struggles to reach, but so far it has worked for him; Quero has never struck out more than 19% of the time at any minor league level. His contact merics from 2023 — an 85% in-zone contact rate, 75% contact overall — would rank near the middle of the primary catching pack across the last couple of seasons, but Quero is still pretty chase-prone. Even with the uptick in walks in 2023, his swing rates (56-57% the last few seasons) have been way up there with the Mario Felicianos, Francisco Mejías and Jorge Alfaros of the world, predecessors whose monster tools have been severely undercut by their voracious approaches. Yainer Diaz had a rock solid 2022 debut with similar rate stats, and Quero is a better defender than him or Mejía (identical rate contact stats), so his floor should be higher. A big part of Quero’s above-average projection comes from his game-changing arm strength, a key component to understand the second he’s catching in games again.

Expand arrow_drop_down

100. Jonny Farmelo, CF, SEA

Drafted: 1st Round, 2023 from Westfield HS (VA) (SEA)
Age 20.4 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/45 50/60 30/55 70/70 45/55 50

Farmelo’s raw power and speed gives him immense potential if he can continue to refine his swing in pro ball. He’ll return from an ACL tear in 2025.

Farmelo had the second-fastest 30-yard dash at the 2023 Draft Combine and showed impressive BP power, but his swing was a bit of a mess and seemed to change constantly throughout his high school career. I was relatively low on him prior to the draft, but the Mariners made his swing better pretty quickly after he signed. He still has a lot of extraneous movement in his hands, but Farmelo looked good during backfield activity and then during Modesto’s 2023 postseason run. Assigned to Modesto again in 2024, Farmelo was slashing .264/.398/.421 across 221 plate appearances when he blew his ACL while making a slightly awkward catch in the outfield. A typical ACL rehab puts him on the shelf until the middle of the 2025 season.

It’s a developmental blow to a prospect who is much more talented than he is polished. Farmelo can create big power in a short mechanical distance at the dish and he has pretty good bat control, but he still has a bunch of pre-swing movement in his hands that impacts the consistency of both. It’s hugely positive that despite this, Farmelo was consistently pulling the ball with power before he got hurt, including fastballs. That’s not often the case with hitters this size or who have funky swings. Farmelo has the footspeed to play center field and makes some incredible plays deep in the gap, but he’s very raw from a procedural and fundamentals standpoint, things like fielding the ball on the ground and where/how hard to throw the baseball. Farmelo has enormous ceiling as a power/speed center fielder if he can season his defensive ability, and the ACL tear robbed him of reps.

Farmelo has a big, physical 6-foot-2 frame. His speed is great on its own, but it’s absolutely incredible how fast Farmelo is for his size. Whether that’s still true on the other side of the ACL tear is also going to have a huge impact on his potential outcomes. This is a rare player who looked like he might have actual five-tool potential, but unfortunately, what was an already risky profile has now seen that risk heightened by severe injury.

Expand arrow_drop_down

101. River Ryan, SP, LAD

Drafted: 11th Round, 2021 from UNC Pembroke (SDP)
Age 26.5 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
60/60 55/60 55/60 40/50 55/70 40/45 95-98 / 100

Ryan looked like an impact starter before injuries ended his 2024, and probably his 2025.

Ryan was a two-way player at UNC Pembroke and one of the more exciting pitchers on the Padres backfields during their 2021 instructs period, when he hadn’t yet pitched in an affiliated game. A plus on-mound athlete with a great arm action and a carrying fastball that was in the 93-95 mph range, he was an exciting, tip-of-the-iceberg dev project for a Padres org that had had recent success with two-way and conversion arms, most prominently Luis Patiño. Then the Dodgers plucked him away in a trade for corner role player Matt Beaty in late March of 2022, and we started to see parts of the iceberg that lay beneath the surface during Ryan’s first full season as a pro pitcher. He was more in the 95-97 mph range throughout 2022 and was dominant (if a little wild) across just shy of 50 total innings. In 2023, Ryan held mid-to-upper-90s fastball velo under the stress of twice as many innings. He posted a 3.33 ERA in 97.1 innings with Double-A Tulsa. Shoulder fatigue shelved him for most of the first half of 2024, and though he looked totally fine upon his initial return and made his big league debut at the end of July, he blew out at the end of the season and had Tommy John in August. It will keep him out for the entire 2025 season.

In addition to the plus velocity, healthy Ryan has three plus-flashing breaking balls in a mid-90s cutter, an upper-80s slider, and a mid-80s curveball with late vertical bite. Ideally Ryan will be able to refine his changeup over time; he was using it less than 10% of the time when he blew out, often in even counts. Its results weren’t great, but he’s a great athlete who is relatively new to pitching, so you can project on that offering. His curveball has enough depth to act as his go-to bat-missing weapon against lefties until his changeup improves.

The visual report here is pretty ironclad. Ryan’s build is a little bit more slight than the prototypical big league starter, but at 6-foot-2, he isn’t small. He has sustained premium velocity over 100 innings of work, his breaking balls are plus to the eye and grade out as plus on paper, and while his command isn’t great, it’s sufficient for Ryan to start and might continue to improve as he gets experience pitching. Ryan was a 55 FV pitcher and looked like one of the better all-around pitcher prospects in baseball before his unfortunately timed TJ added volatility and a prolonged waiting period to his profile.

Expand arrow_drop_down

102. Ricky Tiedemann, SP, TOR

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2021 from Golden West College (TOR)
Age 22.5 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / L FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 60/60 45/50 40/50 93-96 / 98

Tiedemann looked like a mid-rotation starter before he blew out.

Tiedemann had a breakout 2022 pro debut during which he climbed all the way to Double-A and, across just shy of 80 innings, struck out 38.9% of hitters and walked just 9.6%. In 2023, vague arm soreness impacted his workload, and then in 2024, Tiedemann was shelved with a shoulder injury early and blew out his UCL not long after returning from the shoulder issue. He had TJ in late July, putting him on track to miss most or all of 2025.

When he has been healthy, Tiedemann’s stuff has been excellent. He relies heavily on a wicked, mid-to-high-90s four-seamer thrown from a deceptively low lefty arm slot that seems to make hitters in either batter’s box uncomfortable. He pairs it with a huge sweeper that has a boatload of horizontal movement, so much in fact that at times it’s easy for hitters to lay off of it. Still, it’s a great strike-getting weapon because it starts in the lefty batter’s box and finishes on the arm-side corner of the plate. Tiedemann’s changeup is also pretty good, though more because his command of it has progressed; on pure stuff, it’s only fair. He already has two plus pitches and one that pretty comfortably projects to be above average, and even while dealing with arm discomfort in 2023 and 2024, he was able to strike out well over a third of opposing hitters. Aspects of Tiedemann’s delivery are unique in a way that makes him look reliever-y, and repeated years of arm trouble add to that risk, but even if he ends up in the bullpen, he’s going to be such a dominant reliever that he’ll still belong about this high on a prospect list. The 2025 season is Tiedemann’s 40-man platform year, and it will be interesting to see whether the Jays deploy him in the AFL or instructs as a means of determining whether or not to roster him, though doing so would expose him to the eyes of rival scouts who might be foaming at the mouth to pop him in the Rule 5 and see what happens.

Expand arrow_drop_down





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

198 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I kept thinking as I was going through the prospects–aside from Sasaki (who is kind of in a different bucket) it doesn’t feel like there’s an FV65 in this group, let alone an FV70. Basallo and Anthony felt like the closest, but overall it seems like there are a lot less guys who seem like they have star written all over them than there were even a year or two ago.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One of Law’s refrains this offseason has been that MiLB contraction has been really messing with talent development.

Most 18 year olds aren’t Jasson Dominguez, so they’re too busy getting their ass kicked by grown men in Low-A to actually learn anything.

Before contraction, college-aged kids would be playing Rookie-Advanced or Short-Season; now, they either get held back with 17 year olds or thrown against 23 year old org guys.

Law says he only has 70 or so “True” 50 FV guys this year, which is why kids like Lombard snuck onto his list.

But at least the owners are saving negligible amounts of money…and all it cost was the health of the on-field product and the summer vitality of dozens of towns – let’s complain some more about the Dodgers!

Last edited 1 year ago by Cool Lester Smooth
A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago

Seems plausible. Combining that with a weak draft class last year along with some high-profile graduations, and it seems like a perfect storm for a weak list.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

The other thing is that Skenes and Langford raced to the majors so fast they weren’t on here for long.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Truth. I still feel like Holliday, Langford, Chourio, Caminero, Wood, and Skenes from last year beat out this year’s versions of Anthony and Basallo.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think they were all 65s except Caminero, who probably should have been.

I forgot how quickly they jumped up Caminero. Chourio also got promoted from AA to the majors.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Holliday was a 70, and Langford & Chourio were 65s last year. The rest were 60s. I still feel like those remaining 60s were better 60s than Anthony and Basallo.

casey jMember since 2026
1 year ago

Have you seen them play? Holliday is still an unproven player. So why don’t you slap him onto this year’s list in your head, if that would make you feel better?

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

If you think that this year’s top guys are better than last year’s feel free to make that argument. I’m also not the only one who feels like this year’s prospect crop, top to bottom, is weaker. It’s not like I’m taking a crazy position here.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

This is a strange comment. I think it’s pretty natural to compare prospects across years, especially when we’re just starting to see the results of a massive structural change to player development.

aldenMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

it’s not about being whatever “unproven” means to you, it’s about exhausting rookie eligibility as defined by the MLB rule book. if you haven’t exhausted rookie eligibility, then you’re a prospect and you can be on this list.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

I was talking to a friend about this a couple weeks ago. Setting Sasaki aside (because I don’t think Japanese pros are an apples to apples comparison with minor leaguers), while he may have bona fide star potential, Anthony sure feels like the least impressive top prospect in recent memory.

Last edited 1 year ago by slamcactus
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Probably 2008 (BA and MLB had Bruce over Longo) or 2017 (although that at least had Moncada)?

slz
1 year ago

I’ve noticed, probably due to these factors, it seems the “biggest jump in the minors” has shifted from high-A to AA to now being AA to AAA where a number of pitchers are able to stuff there way to that level without needing great command and conversely a lot of hitters make it there before needing a more mature approach, although this is all somewhat complicated by ABS and the different ball

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  slz

Yeah, people aren’t learning how to play in A-Ball so much as they’re being forced through a sieve.

MikeSMember since 2020
1 year ago

Your whole (accurate) rant just reminds me that teams like the Dodgers would probably field 15 minor league teams if they were allowed to. They understand the value of volume at the lower levels.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  MikeS

The Yankees had bought a second FCL team AND an Appy league team in the years before contraction.

amaass2Member since 2019
1 year ago

sigh

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

I think minor league contraction was awful but “the summer vitality of dozens of towns” is overstating things a bit.

I grew up in a minor league town that lost its team (to regular affiliate shuffling and demands of stadium improvements, not to this latest contraction). Minor league ball is a great thing to have in a small town/city, but as an attraction that draws low-to-mid 4-figure daily attendance to businesses that employ a handful of administrative staff and a dozen or so ticket takers and concession workers, it’s not some sort of economic backbone. It’s mostly a thing for local families to do to fill the days during long summer vacations. While it certainly exists, minor league tourism is *extremely* niche.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Sure, there’s a reason I said “vitality” rather than economic backbone, haha!

I’ll never forgive those bastards for taking the NYPL away from me…I mean Burlington.

toddprattMember since 2024
1 year ago

Of the 30 or so teams that were contracted, do we know how many of them went away, as opposed to transitioned to an independent league or something like that? I go to NJ Jackals (Frontier League, ~A ball equivalent) from time to time and it being unaffiliated doesn’t detract from the experience.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  toddpratt

A lot of them have formed collegiate wood-bat leagues…and watching kids from NESCAC schools is a significant downgrade from low-minors chaos.

riibettMember since 2020
1 year ago

River Ryan, now 36, is anticipated to make his full-season debut for the 2035 season with a new arm action described by Dodgers brass as “looking like his arm will dislocate from the socket”

BeefLoafMember since 2019
1 year ago

Love the Hagen Smith ranking and write-up, a lot of White Sox fans were questioning the pick given the lack up offensive talent in their upper minors at the time, but it seems like a great pick in hindsight

MikeSMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  BeefLoaf

I’m a big believer of taking the best guy available in any sport, but especially in baseball. It takes a long time for guys to develop, guys change positions as they mature. So you need multiple guys at almost every position and you can never have too many pitchers.

If you do find yourself with an actual logjam of truly good players (like the White Sox hope to have at catcher), it is generally fairly easy to move younger players in order to fill needs.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  MikeS

The Angels have notoriously taken guys closer to the majors instead of best available, and then they rush everyone. And predictably, they’ve wasted the prime years of Trout when a decent farm system may have given them trade leverage.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

I’m usually all for piling on the Angels, but their pattern of rushing lower-upside but polished college guys to the majors began after the post- “Prime Trout” era.

It pretty much began with Neto in 2022.

And in fairness, while other picks (Schanuel) look like head-scratchers that sacrificed upside for role-player floor, Neto has already turned into a very good pick.

I’d still bet on Holliday overtaking him (though that’s not any sort of guarantee), but excepting Holliday, I’d probably take Neto vs the field if the question was “which of these guys will have the best big-league career?”

CC AFCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  BeefLoaf

Literally hasn’t even pitched in affiliated ball. There’s no “hindsight” there. It’s should just be how you felt before the draft is how you feel now

marchandman34Member since 2020
1 year ago

The moment we’ve all been waiting for, the magnum opus is here, thank you Eric and team!

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago

This made my day!

Earlier last year, on a Guardian’s fan site, I predicted that Angel Genao would be Cleveland’s top prospect for 2025. I took some flak for that and was told that whoever was drafted #1 would be the top prospect. I hadn’t heard Eric talk about Genao so I thought maybe I was wrong about him. I wasn’t even sure Eric would have Genao in the top 100. So imagine my pleasant surprise to see that Genao is listed as Cleveland’s top prospect.

Of course, I am curious about Jaison Chourio. Just about every other ranking has him in the top 100. Was a 45+ last year and put up a 144 wRC+. Seems like that should justify a 50 grade so I’m curious what Eric thinks is missing.

bh216Member since 2024
1 year ago

I’m seeing mixed reports about Chourio’s ability to stick in CF. If Eric is in the “no” camp, then a 45+ FV makes sense. A corner OF with below average power and a couple plus but not standout tools typically falls into that tier.

emh1969
1 year ago
Reply to  bh216

I think that makes sense. Also, a lot of his value comes from drawing walks which is likely to decline as he moves up.

amaass2Member since 2019
1 year ago

Yeah Jaison Chourio and Zyhir Hope are the biggest omissions I’m seeing here relative to BP/BA/MLB prospect rankings.

Amazing work though Eric!!! Been looking forward to this for a loooong time.

mac55
1 year ago

Hot cup of coffee and a day off. I’m in heaven. Thanks Eric.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Let’s whip up some controversy. I have a hard time disagreeing with most of the hitting grades but there are some pitchers that I am not buying the grades.

I guess I’m fine with Jobe at a 60 and Susana at a 55. While the rankings on Hagen Smith and Chase Burn seem incredibly aggressive, I don’t really have a lot of reason to say they shouldn’t be there.

But I would definitely put Dollander and Bubba Chandler over Jobe. It’s nearly impossible to find things to dislike about Dollander, and Chandler’s performance for his age and stuff is elite and he still has more development to go.

I would put Misiorowski and Caden Dana at a 50 for sure as well. Dana is a promising pitcher but he’s been moved up the ladder so fast that it’s all projection. I think he probably compares well to Thomas White, who I really like a lot but I couldn’t justify giving a 55. And Misiorowski looks so much like a reliever right now even if the Brewers are doing the right thing by hoping and praying he figures it out.

I still don’t think Jake Bloss is a Top 100-type of pitcher, Noble Meyer looks like he’s going to go the way of Mick Abel, and Chayce McDermott looks very reliever-y.

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t think it’ll create controversy. You’re clearly the best commenter on Fangraphs and I think most of us value your opinion/perspective.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

whoops, responded to wrong comment.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
g4Member since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Taking the under on pitching prospects is too logical (safe?) to dispute. In the interest of fairness — and since many of us value your opinion — any pitchers off the list who you’d have slapped a 50 on?

mikejuntMember
1 year ago
Reply to  g4

The outcomes dropdown is pretty handy too because for a lot of “FV55” pitchers, there’s a lot of “30% bust chance, 10% FV70 chance” action going on

Yes, pitchers are volatile because of the injury risk, but teams these days also select pitchers with the physical stuff to hit 65-70 if they stay healthy and develop necessary command

This doesn’t happen often, but happening at all is sufficient to counteract some of the injury risk. Look at the chart for Chase Dollander, for instance. He’s in the FV55 bucket, but FV 50/55 is only around 23-25%.

He’s appproaching 40% chance of both bust/fv40 and fv60-70. Its an incredibly wide distribution, and the chart suggests his ranking today will be seen as inaccurate *75%* of the time in a backwards-looking analysis. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t reflect, on balance, a good present-day snapshot of his value.

When the probabilities don’t come close to a normal distribution curve, just looking at the median outcome can be very misleading. There’s no outcome clustering in the middle.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  g4

That is a really hard question because I really don’t believe in most of these pitchers. I definitely am taking the over on Dollander and Chandler but that doesn’t answer your question.

After thinking it over, I would give a 50 to Hunter Barco.

I will say that I like Owen Wild, Jonah Tong and Logan Henderson at least as much as McDermott, and more than Meyer and Bloss. Not sure if I would consider them 50s.

Let me think on this and get back to you if I come up with a couple more names.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
g4Member since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I appreciate your reply (and knew you’d have a couple names up your sleeve) 😉

Eric’s 2017 and 2018 ranking retrospectives have only further supported a reality of TINSTAAPP, but obviously it’s not at all fun to call the endeavor of preidentifying exceptions a futile exercise. Teams are still trying to succeed in this regard, so faithful fans still need to care.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  g4

Okay, here’s my list of guys who weren’t on here:

50: Hunter Barco. (Not likely to be a star, but seems likely to be a 2+ WAR starter, maybe more than that)

Maybe 50, maybe not: Drue Hackenberg (maybe I’m just way too optimistic about him but he made big strides last year and has a lot of decent enough pitches)

45+ but I still like them better than Bloss and Meyer: Winston Santos, Owen Wild, Jonah Tong. (I’ve seen Santos and Tong mentioned by people before, but not Owen Wild. Wild’s velocity is terrible but the fastball has good traits)

Other wild cards that I really like but can’t justify putting even in the category up: Logan Henderson, Michael Forret, Chen Wei-Lin, Luis Perales (Absolutely nobody thinks these guys are close to a Top 100 list except me, but these guys all have great fastballs, a projected plus secondary, and have pitched extremely well. I think all of them have serious upside)

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
TwinPeaks
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Owen Wild isn’t even in BA’s TB Top *40*. I’m flummoxed by his being completely omitted from lists, even though his velocity is sub-optimal.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  TwinPeaks

Owen Wild is my super sleeper pick, since it looks like most of my other picks in that bucket are no longer sleeping.

Eric had him as a 40 last year, and has him sitting 91-92. There are some guys with that type of velocity who do okay, like Brady Singer and Bailey Ober. Zach Eflin and Phil Huges weren’t far off of that either. Wild’s shorter than they are but it seems like he similarly gives batters “uncomfortable” at bats because of the fastball traits.

If he tears apart AA this year like he did High-A, there are going to be a lot of people wondering how he’s doing it.

casey jMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

What about Moises Chace? Looks like a great fastball there too. McDermott is nasty though, and has logged innings unscathed.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

Moises Chace is at #74. He’s definitely one of those guys like Logan Henderson, except with more good pitches. Or like Chen Wei-Lin, but way closer to the majors.

There were a few guys like this who I was going to nominate as under the radar 50s, but Eric got them. Parker Messick, Moises Chace, Travis Sykora, Yilber Diaz…

McDermott is a weird prospect. He cannot hit the strike zone, and the stuff, while good is probably more average than elite. I don’t know what he is. Eric says the command may arrive late, but he’s 26. How much later are we talking about? Maybe Eric thinks he’ll just get converted to a closer and he’ll be good at that. IDK. I like him better than Meyer and Bloss.

Klubot3000Member since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I like the guys you’ve mentioned, especially Henderson, (and really agree with your points about Mis, Dana, and Meyer). I don’t usually like guys that walk as many as McDermott either, but he looks incredible when he’s on and, health permitting, has as good a chance as anyone on the Hondo (TM) to perform in the 60+ range.

I’d submit Thomas Harrington, KC Hunt, Nestor German, and my own personal cheeseballs Jake Miller and Ben Shields as guys that I think should be on the back end of this list.

mikejuntMember
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

This might be the first year in a while where your ranks-I-disagree-with didn’t include some Dodger prospects.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Diego Cartaya was a Dodgers prospect for a long time!

The ranking on Rushing is a little aggressive, and I guess I would drop guys like Tiedemann and River Ryan off the list. I buy Freeland and de Paula where they are.

The big disagreement I have with the Dodgers prospects is sticking Henriquez on a list like this.

mikejuntMember
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I guess if you think he’s gonna be a dominant reliever that’s a reasonable bottom-of-the-100 sort of player, but it needs to be pretty dominant.

casey jMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think McDermott is underrated, actually. Already soured on Noble Meyer, eh? Why? Asking for the info. I like Bloss too, based on viewings of him.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

McDermott is a weird prospect. He has a ton of pitches that grade out around average, he gets a ton of K’s and walks guys way too much. Everything about him screams “effectively wild” and that works way better in the minors than in the majors. Maybe his stuff plays up and his walks play down in the bullpen? Eric says the command may arrive late, but he’s 26…how late are we talking about? He and Carson Whisenhunt are similar for me, in that they’re probably relievers. But Whisenhunt at least has that crazy changeup.

Meyer doesn’t look like he can throw strikes at all. How many guys in A-ball walk this many batters and then turn into major league pitchers? It’s not a lot. He’s young and far away enough that he could be one of the lucky ones but that cuts both ways, because being young and far away isn’t good for being a pitching prospect. He’s still a prospect, but I wouldn’t give him a 50. He and Alex Clemmey have some similarities.

Bloss is kind of in the Kyle Harrison bucket from a few years ago, and is kind of a good example of how guys like Meyer usually end up. Bloss was getting a ton of whiffs at the lower levels but walking way too many batters. He was able to rein in the walks but the K’s disappeared. Again, he’s a real prospect, but I wouldn’t give him a 50.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

Big dip for Josue De Paula. He was flirting with the top 10 at the midseason update and now down to 48.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

But seriously, this seems like a big dip. He’s practically a child and just hit A+ ball really well. Idk, i guess i just think we’ll see him rise.

mikejuntMember
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

I understand the ranking. I’d love to see De Paula work out (I am a Dodger fan, after all). Prospects like him are very exciting because the upside is tremendous, and so far the performance is great.

The other side of the coin is that it’s not at all uncommon to see guys with his profile – extreme physical gifts – follow the trajectory he has been on until they hit the wall when their prodigious physical gifts alone are no longer sufficient. De Paula hasn’t really departed from that trajectory yet because he’s still in the phase where the holes in his game remain the same, but they’re not stopping him because of the degree to which his ability exceeds that of the competition – regardless of age.

He will eventually need to address these holes, because physical ability alone doesn’t typically carry guys into long MLB careers. Some guys hit that wall already; some don’t until AA or AAA, some dominate all the way to MLB before it comes. But it basically always comes.

The presumption has to be that De Paula will need to show he can learn to cover these gaps, and his grade not increase until he does so, or until he demonstrates that he can hit in MLB without doing so. Only a small handful of guys ever do that.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  mikejunt

just weird to see him go from #12 in july to 48 now. but its fine!

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

Probably worth keeping in mind that the difference between 12 and 48 is a half-grade.

It’s perfectly reasonable for an aggressive ranking on a teenager to back up a half grade, especially when the kid doesn’t project to play a premium position and his power hasn’t yet shown up the way it’ll need to.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

yeah thats a good point about the half grade. As i peel back the onion, it seems like the decrease in a half grade was based on a 1.5 grade decrease in hit tool. thats a big decrease in hit tool based on a few months of hitting. i guess this stuff is all rapid.

Klubot3000Member since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

His defense also remains atrocious, so any slippage in the hit tool or game power projection should have a large impact on his FV grade.

achidesterMember since 2020
1 year ago

Brilliant stuff, as always.

Very pleased to see Susana so high. I’ve spent so much time hoping for him to have enough command to be a late-inning reliever, I’m restraining my optimism that he could be a mid-rotation option.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
1 year ago

No Termarr boo! Seems like a case of prospect fatigue over his production and talent.

riibettMember since 2020
1 year ago

Slugging .385 at high A will do that

willl
1 year ago
Reply to  riibett

Or hitting .239 across 252 minor league games, when his carrying tool was supposed to be hit Hit tool.

The Pirates really have a thing for developing bad “good hitters”. Are we sure Johnson isn’t just a 2B regen of KeBryan Hayes?

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  willl

His .239 was worth a 121 wRC+ and includes a terrible 1st month + when he was playing hurt against older pitchers all season. He is nothing like Hayes, he has way more power and he isn’t a top glove guy. I think that the change in profile from hit to power is definitely affecting his ranks, but we just saw a Dan Uggla comp this offseason which is an easy 50.

riibettMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think it’s fair to be skeptical of an essentially bat-only 2B prospect who hasn’t had great results yet (even if some of the underlying numbers are cause for more optimism)

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago

Issue with him becoming a power-over-hit guy is that the power production hasn’t been anything special, either.

I don’t have a problem with Johnson being a 50…but I also don’t have a problem with him being a 45.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

Can we collectively move past the idea that an >100 minor-league wRC+ is some sort of difference-maker in an argument?

Cole Young, another HS guy from the 2022 draft class, put up virtually the same wRC+ (119) at a higher level (double-A vs A+ for Johnson), and projects to stick at shortstop, and that combination of tools and performance has him firmly on the back half of most peoples’ lists as a guy who projects as a regular but has little star potential.

This is a list of the 100 guys across the entire minor leagues who are the most likely to have decent or better big-league careers. Just being an above-average hitter in the minors at a young-ish age, without something else (like an elite carrying tool or premium defense), usually isn’t going to be enough to get you on it.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  riibett

That slugging is also higher than the league average and he’s a full two years younger than the league average. I don’t think he’s faced a pitcher younger than him yet. And while Greensboro is the only homer haven in the SAL, his splits there were pretty even.

There’s certainly reasons to be apprehensive about with Termarr: the defense, the in-zone contact issues. I cant help but think some of this is a backlash against what he is as a player vs what people thought they were getting. As the years go by, maybe the industry just doesn’t have much idea which prep hitters will hit and which ones won’t.

It remains to be seen how his approach works in the upper levels, or if it does.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Someone can put him at 80 or at 120 without my gainsaying them.

slz
1 year ago

Yeah, Eye of the Beholder type thing. I personally mark down every young 2B prospect a grade because if they’re playing there it means something is wrong with them and I am also not really a fan of “he just hits” types until they prove it, which Termarr hasnt

Right now I view him as like, what if you had Jett Williams but without the “Jett,” and that’s not a particularly special player to me. I’m not sure Jett himself is, honestly

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

The bar for top-100 prospect is considerably higher than “above average hitter in the SAL.”

He had the 63rd highest SLG in the SAL among qualified hitters, and 8 guys ahead of him were his age or younger. Only 3 of those 8 guys made the list (Walcott, Miller, Isaac).

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  riibett

As will running only average contact rates and hitting .239 when the hit tool was supposed to be the thing driving the entire prospect profile.

Cardaughter Transtulli
1 year ago

I’m still high on him but let’s face it something’s wrong with the way the Pirates are evaluating batters.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
1 year ago

I’m not sure if it’s evaluating or developing. Or maybe both. I have serious reservations on Griffin because of this very issue.

bubblesMember since 2024
1 year ago

I’m surprised at Wetherholt’s hit tool dropping so much. I’m guessing it is the in zone contact rating? His plate discipline metrics about in zone versus out of zone swing decisions look great. His exit velocities also looked good especially for a SS prospect as he consistently hits the ball hard. He could pull and hit the ball in the air a little more, but the general tools look there to me with some tweaks needed to fully realize the upside.

nathanjMember since 2024
1 year ago

My kids & I saw Jesus Made, Luis Pena, and Luke Adams take BP yesterday. It’ll be fun to follow how Made & Pena are doing. I told my kids that Adams was hit by pitch 40 times in 2024.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  nathanj

Some people think Pena has a better year than Made did. I don’t think he is as good of a prospect because there are some real power questions but he’s definitely a follow.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Are you saying people think Pena *had* a better year than Made, or *will have* a better year this year?

If you meant past tense, that’d be a really tough case to make. One that relies on arguing that BABIP in the DSL is a skill. Pena struck out a little less, but Made hit the ball much harder, walked more than twice as often, and showed more in-game and raw power.

Last edited 1 year ago by slamcactus
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Had, past tense.

FWIW I don’t buy it either. He looks very interesting but stats in the DSL don’t mean anything. Even if he is more likely to stick at shortstop.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Interesting. Not something I’ve heard. Seems to me that anyone saying that either has a pretty rudimentary understanding of predictive stats/data or just wants to be contrarian. Before Made the only guy i can remember generating anything close to this much buzz based on his DSL performance was Julio Rodriguez, and the degree to which Made’s won everyone over blows JRod’s DSL hype out of the water.

Beyond that, while I’m with you on all DSL stats not meaning anything, to the extent there’s gradations of not meaning anything, the rate at which a DSL kid’s balls in play fall in for hits when the defenders are basically the international version of showcase circuit teenagers ranks right at the very top (assuming we’re sorting from most-to-least meaningless).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Surprised not to see Cooper Pratt on here. Maybe the hitting has some issues but he is still quite young, and now that it looks like he is going to stick at shortstop it is hard to move off of him.

The other guy I think really should be here (at least that I noticed) is Harry Ford. I think we are seeing some major prospect fatigue about him, but he is still fairly young and it sure seems like he still has a chance to catch. We aren’t even sure if these catchers are going to pan out until they are 23 or 24 and he did pretty well in AA at 21.

I think in both of these cases their performance for their age and chance to stick at a premium defensive position makes them easy 50s.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
grandbranyanMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, those are interesting falloffs from the midseason update where both were 50 FV at #39 (Ford) and #68 (Pratt).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

Pratt has a ton of work to do since he either seems capable of hitting for average (in A ball) or power (at high-A) but not both.

But he held his own at High-A at 19 while everyone thinks he will now stick at short. You don’t really have to hit that well to be a 2 to 2.5 WAR player at short, and if he actually does hit to close for a 100 wRC+ you’re looking at a first division regular for sure. There’s a few different ways he could go but he would have to fail in two of three of his hit tool, power, and shortstop defense in order not to become a regular.

For Ford, I think you just cannot give up on the tools even though his underlying contact rates and defense give some cause for alarm. Catchers develop so late, and he handled AA just fine at a more than age appropriate level for any hitter. You can definitely overthink a guy like this when there’s prospect fatigue. He reminds me a bit of Travis d’Arnaud who was really promising before injuries wrecked his career, and I think there’s an outside chance he hits like Cal Raleigh.

Zach JenningsMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I reread this list probably 4 times because I was positive I was missing Pratt.

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016
1 year ago

After the article last Monday (How Do Prospect Grades Translate to Future Outcomes?), It really does feel like this list has 10 guys who will be good, another 10-15 guys who will probably-maybe be good, and then a lot of meh. There is sure to be a star somewhere in there, but I wouldn’t bet on any individual specifically.
I’m all-in on Andrew Painter being legit, as if Philly needs better pitching. I’m also curious to see what Jasson Dominguez can do being given a full season and full-time job. I think he’ll K too much, but after hearing about him forever I want some form of catharsis.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

I think you’re expecting too much from these 100 names as a collective group. Or, alternatively, your conception of “good” vs “meh” is pretty demanding. A 2 WAR/year performer is a good result. A 50FV guy is a guy who reasonably projects at 2 WAR if he reaches the median of his range of outcomes. That article showed that about 50% of 50FV guys reach that major league regular level or better. Which is pretty much what you’d expect if Eric’s doing a good job (which he is).

At any given time there aren’t 100 guys who are a high-percentage bet to become future stars.

Which makes perfect sense, because MLB has fewer than 100 stars at any given time. And the ones who do become stars tend to hang around MLB for a decade or longer, while the outer range of time guys hang onto top-100 prospect status is about 3 years.

Last edited 1 year ago by slamcactus
bookbookMember since 2024
1 year ago

5 M’s listed here, but none of Lazaro, Ford, or Arroyo (or Cjintje or Sloan). The M’s might not have future stars, but they do have a collection of interesting pieces to watch.

asaw780
1 year ago

16 catchers?! Keith Law, is that you?

slz
1 year ago
Reply to  asaw780

Definitely feels like people are shoehorning catchers into their lists from a combo of getting any value out of the position being a win and the latter half (latter 3/4?) of the Top 100 being kind of light right now

I do wonder if anyone has a study on top C prospects. Anecdotally, it feels to me like the variance is higher than other position players with a number of top guys going bust and late bloomers providing value. I would guess the wear and tear of the position is a factor in this and it’s also a lot harder to nail down defensive projections due to pitch framing being almost like pitching – a guy can just wildly swing his whole profile over an offseason due to an adjustment.

It’s not like OF defense where a miss evaluation wise is like, okay this guy we thought was a poor defender can maybe be average until his late 20s. Nah, a guy who was thought to be a terrible defender at C might end up a top 20% defender there if he’s an awesome framer and good at working with pitchers. And this can randomly happen 3 years after he’s been a full-time major leaguer

Add in that all but a few rare exceptions dont play full seasons and the position probably needs to be downgraded rather than upgraded in prospect value. I wouldnt go full TINSTAAP but more along the lines of There Is Such Thing As A Catching Prospect But We Don’t Always Know Who They Are

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  slz

Austin Wells is a 1B/DH!

…oh, he’s a dope framer.

slz
1 year ago

The Braves traded William Contreras because they thought he’d be a DH. Now he’s arguably the best catcher in the league!

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  slz

Shoehorned in, but… I don’t get it. They’re everywhere. It feels like it’s all pitchers and catchers, all day. And the position players that are listed were given a pass on 2024 performance while dozens of other guys who took steps forward were left off.

3 catchers in the top 11. 3 more in the top 30. 5 more in the top 53. 11 of the top 53 prospects are catchers? Moises Ballesteros isn’t an HM though? Or Eduardo Tait or Cole Carrigg or Ralphy Velazquez? In this historic era of young catchers, Jefferson Quero has 1 AB all year and sneaks in past them as 99 on the list? And anecdotally, it feels like all them are 6’2″, broad shoulders, big power potential, defensive question marks, except for Salas. And again anecdotally, it feels like everyone – not just C – has a blurb about being vulnerable to heat up and away? Gives me a template vibe, boilerplate vibe.

Colson Montgomery gets a pass on his performance but Jace Jung, Adael Amador, Ronny Mauricio, Orvelio Martinez, Brady House, Cam Collier, and Temarr Johnson don’t, even though their performances were all substantially better?

Felnin Celesten didn’t really play, and I don’t have a problem with him, but if we’re going off projection what about Konnor Griffin, Emil Morales, Bryce Ranier, Braden Taylor, Franklin Arias, or Michael Arroyo?

Juan Brito – again no problem with him – but no mention of other proximity/floor guys, say maybe a Christian Moore, James Triantos, or Sal Stewart? Or Nacho Alvarez, or Justin Foscue, or Alen Roden, or even Deyvison Santos?

2 of the top 3 prospects are OF, and 5 of the top 20, but overall I count only 9 OFer in the top 100, and that’s if we’re calling Jett Williams, Luke Keaschall, and Jac Caglianone OFers as they’re listed.. But no room for Lazaro Montes, Jaison Chourio, Zhyir Hope, Charlie Condon, Enrique Bradfield, Robert Colaz, Colby Thomas, or Aidan Smith?

There’s 40 pitchers on the list, did we really need 2 more injured pitchers that won’t play this year at 101 and 102, but none of the guys above? Lazaro Montes? Zhyir Hope?

I’m not nitpicking at the guys I’m comparing against – Montgomery, Celesten, Brito, etc.. I am saying that an awful lot of legitimate prospects, who compare favorably to those types, were left off the list, seemingly to make room for an army of bat first catchers? But Moises Ballesteros isn’t one of the top 16 catching prospects? And no room for MOntest or Hope or Condon, or Ranier or Griffin or, or, or, or, or, and or…. All so we can have 40 SP all with apparently the same mid-rotation potential, besides Sasaki and Painter?

Man I appreciate the hard work and sweat equity that goes into preparing something like this. But this is the FG prospect list that I’ve been most skeptical about, and it’s by a whole lot.
,

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

Deyvison De Los Santos was a weird inclusion by me. He has the proximity but not the floor. Swap his name out for Caleb Durbin or someone, or even Angel Martinez who was a pick to click, had the same 45 ranking last offseason, ranked back-to-back with Brito in the CLE org, had a similar year (111 wRC+ in AAA) to Brito (113), but started slow, is a year younger, a better fielder, and made it to the majors where he didn’t embarrass himself. ]
Any number of proximity guys fit that mold is the point, (but not Deyvison, a position-less boom or bust power hitter), it feels like it was less comprehensive than previous years.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

Caleb Durbin is 25 and flat out does not hit the ball hard enough to be a starting MLB player, even with the shiny surface stats, unless he’s an insane exception (83.8 EV/.315 xwOBA in AAA).

Gonna be a SUPER fun utility guy for the next 7 years, though.

Last edited 1 year ago by Cool Lester Smooth
Randy HEatonMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

I agree.

Last edited 1 year ago by Randy HEaton
dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  Randy HEaton

Yeah pretty much. ZIPS projects Moore at a 113 wRC+ this year, with 1.1 WAR in 217 PA. Every single projection on FG has him as above replacement level. Over 1.0 WAR in 600 PA in fact, for a guy who was playing at Tennessee last year but finished the year with a 169 wRC+ in AA.

I don’t think they’d consider moving him for an arm with mid-rotation upside for even a second..

casey jMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

-1

If he doesn’t think Lazaro is as good as you do, then he’s not on the list. Simple enough

Make your own list!

Last edited 1 year ago by casey j
slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

I like that this is framed as having “room” for guys. As if Eric won’t be explaining his opinion on each guy who missed the list in more detail than we get from other outlets with 8X the full-time staff.

Say what you want about the judgment calls, which people can disagree on, but anyone who’s read FG for any period of time knows that if a guy’s not on the list it’s not because Eric forgot about him.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Lol. I’ve been reading FG religiously since 2011. I was a happy member of the Corey Kluber Fan Club. Feel free to use Google to search my name for comments made over a decade ago.

And no need to be sensational, Eric is by himself this year, he copies and pastes all previous notes and then updates them, so anyone that has been reading FG for any period of time would know that from time-to-time, an outdated note carries over. And Eric would be the first to acknowledge he has misses.

Such as all these guys bc he’s gunshy and over adjusted over his Miguel Bleis love affair. Which, if you remember, was itself an overadjustment from being too harsh on grading lower level prospects, and Tess was in lock step on that over adjustment.

Which they admitted was such. But hey, some people acknowledge when they miss so that they can continue to get better. Like Eric, and the rest of the FG writers.

But thanks, for lack of a better word, for your imperious and idiotic try.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

So if I don’t agree with every ranking, now I have to make my own list? You know everyone will have disagreements with the list, right? But bc I took the time to post mine in a well-reasoned and relevant comment, and evidently it was too many names for you to keep up with, you felt compelled to leave this lazy reply? What do you think you’re accomplishing, trying to throw shade without any actual thought or data or anything to contribute?

Don’t answer, IDC, I know all I need to know about you. You’re a turd. IDC about turds.

Lazaro is ranked #53 at BP. #28 at Fantrax. #42 at MLB Pipeline. #97 at BA with a 55 grade overall.. Keith Law has him at #66. He’s #42 on MiLB. Just Baseball has him at #51. Dan has him at #72 in his ZIPS list. Some mainstream rankings: CBS at 30, NBC Sports at 31, NYT at 66. And I could go on and on.

Konnor Griffin, Charlie Condon, Chourio, Rainer,
Ballesteros, Arroyo, and Moore are all similarly nearly universally ranked as mid-top 100 prospects. Condon particularly is ranked higher nearly across the board. I won’t bother listing their rankings though, you’ll just ignore the data and try to post another cool-guy reductive remark that’s not relevant to my original comment.

My comment had merit. Your snide and dismissive reply had none. WTF are you doing here in the comment section other than trying to be the world’s lamest bully by getting upvotes on FG by crapping on someone? Pro tip: if you’re going to do that, you should know wtf you’re talking about.

Feel free to have the last word, I’m not replying to you again, troll. But please do GFY a few times.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

Great points. The best lists clearly aggregate all other lists, and any deviation beyond 5-10 spots of ordinal rank discredits the project entirely.

Disagreeing with lists is fine. It can be done in a reasoned and respectful way.

Framing your disagreement as someone who goes into as much depth as EL does is wrong because he departs from others’ opinions is obnoxious. If you want to know why some guys were left off, ask in the chat or wait for his writeup, and decide whether you agree or not.

OtisMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Right? Eric goes to great lengths to explain his reasoning in chats, write-ups, and podcasts. It’s clear he works very hard, and approaches it with immense curiosity and humility. “Obnoxious” is a good word for those who accuse him of bad faith or incompetence. Almost as obnoxious as those who trot out a random “miss” from five years ago to try to discredit the effort and work.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  Otis

Obnoxious is also a good word for a straw man who doesn’t even read what they’re replying to before jumping on the bandwagon.

I never came close to accusing him of bad faith or incompetence.

I also acknowledged his hard work. Both in the original comment and in subsequent comments.

So I don’t know what clouds you’re yelling at here, but your comments are apropos of nothing. Just another guy who doesn’t think for himself and is so desperate to fit in that he jumps on the first opportunity to do so by trying to pile on someone else. I couldn’t possibly care less that a bunch of posers are eager to display their lack of critical thinking and general relevancy, but the de-evolution of the FG comments section into a bunch of ignorant keyboard smashing is a real bummer.

See how I’m not making random claims that you never said just to try to make myself feel better at your expense? See how my comment actually pertains to your comment, and by being an easily influenced follower that doesn’t think for themselves, you make it easy to dismiss you back to the children’s table?

No. I didn’t think so. Everyone else does though. Keep attacking that straw man though, that’ll work out well for you, someone, somewhere, probably feels the way you’re describing. Maybe.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

Your periodic reminder that supposed “mammoth raw power” guy Laz Montes was out-powered by consensus 50-at-best power guy Michael Arroyo at both stops this year. The two were the same age.

And his underlying data doesn’t look great either, from what I’ve read.

I think it’s time for people to realize Montes’s results aren’t backing up the overly-aggressive Yordan comps yet and that his home parks have played a role in making it look otherwise.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

My post was about the over representation of iffy potential second division catchers. I mentioned 38 names. It was not a post about Lazaro Montes, as much as you want to say it was.

I’ve already to replied about Montes above. Guess you should go tell Dan his system is a fail, because you want to cherry pick and try to look like you know what you’re talking about.

Effin moron.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

lol. The comment I responded to literally had a paragraph on Montes.

Who I hope makes it, to be clear. I’m just not going to fault somebody for not ranking a bat-first (only?) prospect who didn’t have a particularly elite year with the bat, esp when other outlets have him as a guy who just made the list. There’s very little difference between 97 and 150 or so. You’re getting too bent out of shape over who made it and who didn’t. There aren’t 100 high probability future stars in the minors at any one time. Reasonable people, even reasonable people with relevant subject matter expertise, can and do disagree.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

No. There is no paragraph on Montes in the original post you replied to, and it’s a classic example of trying to cherry pick someone’s comments. The whole thing is right above for all to see.

The paragraph I wrote about Montes was in response to a comment left yesterday. The reply I wrote about Montes 14 hours ago, did not exist yet when you made your comments about Montes 18 hours ago.

Just because you lie about something to make it fit what you said doesn’t make it true. There is no paragraph about Montes in what you replied to, and you know it. There is nothing reasonable about twisting my words to claim that I wrote anything at all specifically about Montes, and then purposely bringing up a reply you know was made later in defense, because for some reason, I need to defend my opinion. Commenting royalty like you and the other bozo in the peanut gallery can make up false claims to try and insult and discredit my opinion, and when I respond with objective facts, rather than explain your false claim, you just make up some more to try to gaslight me, because no matter what, narcissist, you’ve always got to be right.

Problem is that doesn’t work when something is in writing with time stamps, and I haven’t edited a single post. Unlike the clown I replied to that thought he was burning me with the “mAkE yOuR oWn LiSt!” because I didn’t agree with every single name.

Don’t be a liar. What you’re doing right here is the exact cause of the collapse of civilized discourse, and you have the audacity to try and talk down to me about getting bent out of shape? Because unsolicited, when I wasn’t denigrating anyone, and ended by saying I appreciate Eric’s time and hard work, you insulted me and tried to dismiss my opinion by using cherry picked partial sentences, and then double down on it?

I’m done with you, I’m not going to argue. Because A, there is nothing to argue about, I’m not going to let your need to validate yourself at the expense of anything close to resembling integrity and intellectual honest, especially when the proof is indisputable and it’s right above. And B, even if it wasn’t, arguing with a fool only proves there are two, and I don’t think board is large enough to accommodate another one of you.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

You’re right, I guess I was responding to your earlier back and forth about Montes. Who you referenced in your first comment.

He sticks out as a player for whom it’s extremely silly to criticize his position in rankings. The reasons someone might not like him is obvious, as are the reasons other people do.

He’s been projected as a 1B/DH at best since he was 16. He hits well (a mark in his favor), but different evaluators are going to put different weight on his lack of defensive value and the poor track record of guys who are bad enough athletes by their mid-teens that they’re nearly ruled out of anything but baseball’s easiest position. Add in that the results last year were more good than great, and I’m not particularly sure why anyone should care that other outlets have him ranked as high as 42.

Last edited 1 year ago by slamcactus
slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

The reasons *are* obvious. Grammar’s hard when you’re editing on a small screen.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Then every other prospect list is silly?

You just said that of course, a consensus list is best. Again, the written record is here, no matter how many times you move your goalpost to avoid being wrong.

The best lists clearly aggregate all other lists, and any deviation beyond 5-10 spots of ordinal rank discredits the project entirely.

And he’s not ranked as high as 42, he’s 42 on Keith Law’s list and MiLB, but he’s ranked as high as 30.

And now you’re saying to criticize him not being ranked – which I didn’t criticize, I questioned, and I didn’t question him not being ranked, I questioned 16 catchers with iffy futures, nearly 40 SP, and I criticized only one thing, the inclusion of Tiedeman and River Ryan at 101 and 102 as opposed to people like Montes, you clown – is silly? I wouldn’t put Montes at 101 if it were my list. I’d put Zhyir Hope. I wouldn’t put Montes at 102, I’d put Condon. I wouldn’t put Montes at 103 or 104 or 105.

As I’ve already explained to you, I never made anything about Montes, other than defending my comment against a post from someone with a playground level maturity and mentality. I used Montes as 1 of 38 examples of people that could’ve been considered in place of the abundance of catching prospects and potential mid-rotation starters. So you can keep banging your head against about Montes thinking you’re proving yourself right, and continue to be exposed as a fraud with no conviction and no point if you want. You’re the one that is going on and on about Montes, showing yourself to be a hypocrite and a liar. Not me.

I didn’t criticize anything other than the over-representation of iffy catching prospects and SP who project for mid-rotation ceilings if all breaks right. And I stand by that. And dollars to donuts, next year Eric will be saying “Yeah, I went a bit too heavy on those types, I’m going to scale it back this year.”

But whatever. Based on your comment, you’ve now flip-flopped again, but you’re not contradicting me and you have never have been. Now you’re only contradicting yourself, the points you’ve made. The mental gymnastics are exhausting. You’re ridiculous. You’re not a serious person. Idk what they’re teaching in clown college nowadays, but it’s absurd.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

LOL. The fact that you couldn’t pick up on the aggregator comment as sarcasm is the cherry on top here.

I value original content and opinions based on the first-hand evaluation of someone whose experience and expertise I trust. Anyone with a computer and a bit of time can aggregate other peoples’ lists. If that’s your thing, go hang out at Bleacher Report.

And yes, quibbling about the ranking of a guy like Montes is silly, because there’s no right answer. Whether he’s ranked 30th or outside the 100, everyone’s report on him will read pretty similarly — big raw, iffy hit, zero glove — with ranking differences based on how likely people are to think he’ll be the exception to the generalization that bad-bodied, unathletic teenagers usually don’t make it.

And yeah, it’s also silly to quibble with how much an evaluator weights a guy’s chance to stick at the game’s toughest position, or a guy’s chance to become a mid-rotation SP at a time when those are becoming way harder to find.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Stop with your elitist BS. Your entire post was just you forcing in an attempted insult of “I read FG, you don’t, therefore I’m better”, and you signaling to other members of the community to come dunk on me with you bc FG good.

And now you’re going to go with “iF tHaTs YoUr ThInG gO rEaD bLeAcHeR rEpOrT?”

We’ve already established that I’ve been reading FG a helluva lot longer than you have. You’re just a fake, insincere piece of trash, IDK what else to say. You’re not gatekeeper of FG, and you reading it recently doesn’t give you some authority or credibility over other people. Stop invoking FG to try to prove some point you don’t have. This is the last time I’ll even respond to one of your asinine replies. Just know that you’re the lowest of the low among society, and reading FG does nothing to change that. You’re a sad, sad excuse for a person.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

And STFU about Montes if you think you’re making a point. Try replying to the other 37 names in my comment if you want to have genuine discourse. I still won’t reply, bc you’re pathetic and keep signaling you reading FG as the reason you’re opinion is more valid, but you don’t an opinion, you’re just a pathetic idiot. And that’s me saying as nice of a thing as I possibly can about you. AH.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  asaw780

I’m pretty skeptical of Adrian Del Castillo but I’m willing to buy the grades on all the other ones. I just don’t think Del Castillo is going to play catcher enough to offset the fact that he’s not going to hit that well.

Agustin Ramirez, however, I think he’s going to hit.

casey jMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Adrian hit .313 with 26 bombs in AAA, and hit .312 with a .525 in the bigs. Why would he not hit?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  casey j

Do not trust the D-Backs’ upper level affiliates! The run scoring environments there are absolutely nuts. (Also, that’s why we should be careful about downplaying pitchers who seem to struggle a bit there)

He eventually did okay there after he kind of muddled through AAA in the second half of last year, but he is going to strike out a lot and he does not have the raw power to make up for it. His EV was 87.6 in his time in the majors and his xWOBA was .293. It’s not like his EV was that much better in AAA, a 90.4 EV is like a 45…and that was against AAA pitchers.

None of this would matter much if he could play catcher 100 games a year, but it doesn’t look like that is something anyone would want.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
bubblesMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  asaw780

How many of these catchers do we think will actually stick at the position? The problem with many catching prospects is that if they can’t they are a 1B or DH as most aren’t athletic enough to handle COF. Some like Rushing are, but most aren’t. I wonder if someone like Adrian Del Castillo was simply always a 1B in the minors if he would even be on the list (I don’t think so) as I don’t think Castillo is a big league catcher. I also don’t think Liranzo or Edgar Quero will stick at catcher. Unsure on many others like Basallo, Rushing, and Ramirez. Some of these guys I definitely think should still be top 100 guys, but I think evaluating them as 1B would drop them a good amount.

Man of these catchers are also severe hit tool risks. The potential is super high for these power profile types, but the bust rate is higher on them as well. Add on the likely 1B home for some of these guys and I am much lower than Eric on many of these guys. I wouldn’t have 50 FV grades on Liranzo, Quero, Mack, Del Castillo, and Crooks. Crooks I am unsure if he hits enough to be a consistent starter but has a high floor being at least a solid backup. The others I listed have above average potential although maybe as a 1B power hitter type, but they have a lot of risk of striking out way too much to be valuable.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  bubbles

I totally missed that Mack was on there. He definitely shouldn’t be. I also don’t believe in Castillo, for the same reasons. I will stick up for Liranzo, though. There’s a chance that the hit tool doesn’t develop and he has to shift to first, which would make him a quad A type, but if even one of those happens he is an everyday player.

LCPC
1 year ago

Thanks for the list, seems like a “down” class for prospects without a real true star in waiting. Some of the ETAs are perplexing but I always love the write ups.

Last edited 1 year ago by LCPC
TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  LCPC

I actually think the ETAs are much better than they have been in the past. In years past, they’ve been way too conservative in my opinion. I guess at this point this could be empirically tested so I could be proven wrong.

gbove30Member since 2021
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

The ETAs are just simply when they are Rule 5 eligible, not Eric projecting their debut. This is noted in the first paragraph.

TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  gbove30

I mean, that isn’t really true, as is noted in that same first paragraph.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

This has always been by pet peeve about The Board. Eric should just delete that column entirely and pipe in the Rule 5 status from Roster Resource. At least we would know what it represents. Right now it’s the Rule 5 timeline, except when it isn’t, and there is no information about when it isn’t.

Hazmat CorntailMember since 2022
1 year ago

Wow, when I mentioned Spencer Jones in a chat recently, there was still some optimism expressed. And now he’s completely off the list. What now?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago

Read the Yankees writeup – Eric has him as a 45+ on the basis that he’s athletic and hits the ball so damn hard, but he just doesn’t hit the ball anywhere near often enough at this point.

Healthy Justin Maxwell would be a pretty solid outcome, IMO.

Hazmat CorntailMember since 2022
1 year ago

Yeah, I did catch that one; it’s difficult because I’m at the end of the first in this years draft and I have to decide on giving him more time or hoping a better prospect falls to me, which rarely happens. I’ll probably give it another year and see if he can iron things out before moving on.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

I’d give serious thought to cutting bait. His K% would be disqualifying even under the *old* minor-league standard. That he’s doing it in today’s minors, which most people view as reflecting seriously diminished talent levels across the board due to contraction, is beyond concerning.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think the upside here looks like Matt Wallner with better defense, and the downside is Stephen Moya. There’s still space for him to be a good player, but it is going to come with a stunning number of strikeouts, on the very edge of making him unplayable.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Matt Wallner: CF is a five or six win guy…but I don’t think I’d even call his downside Moya.

More like Franchy.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I don’t think he’s a center fielder. I think he’s probably a plus defender in a corner.

Probably.

Even average defense in a corner with a Matt Wallner level of hitting would make him a star. It’s still in the range of outcomes for him. But if I had to guess I’d say he’s going to be the larger half of a platoon and he’s going to be good but not elite at it.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If I have to guess…he never makes enough contact, or walks enough, to be Joey Gallo.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

These guys are actually not that rare, it is just that they usually aren’t interesting enough to notice. Some look pretty good for a while like Wallner or Nolan Jones, others show flashes like Will Benson or Garrett Mitchell. They’re all super frustrating though and are going to have periods where they look terrible. And most of them are just not good, they’re like Taylor Trammell or Daniel Palka or Sam Hilliard. Or they never even make the bigs long enough for us to remember them like Moya.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago

Last year, when some outlets were ranking Jones and people were getting furious at the ones who weren’t, I asked the honest question whether anyone’s aware of a single player in recent memory who struck out 30% of the time in A+ ball at the age of 22 and went on to make it as an above-average Major-League regular.

Even the most glaring examples of high-K guys who made it were both (a) younger and (b) struck out less in A-ball than Jones did.

And then he went and struck out 20% more often the following season.

Count me as one of the guys who thinks his approach is a deal-breaker and confines him to 2nd-division regular upside.

tjralstin13Member since 2024
1 year ago

Thank you for the awesome write-up! Pretty amazing (especially from a Rangers fan) that Walcott has such high praise as an 18 year old across the industry. I recognize his size, batted-ball ability, and hitting adjustments he made as the season went on are all fantastic, but 24 errors in 700 innings at SS with a .913% fielding percentage seems not great. Based on your comments did he make most of those mistakes earlier on in the season? If he continues to make that many errors at SS, that’s probably too many to stay at the position no? I couldn’t figure out if you can sort fielding statistics in minor league game logs.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Looking through this list hammers home how good the Tigers have gotten in such a short amount of time. Harris is on my short list of the best front office guys in baseball. I’m slightly higher on McGonigle and Clark, and I didn’t see Melton or Briceno coming at all. Plus Jobe and Liranzo. The future looks very bright.

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, I was thinking both of these were a little low. Neither are big power guys, but, Clark especially should be a great fit in Comerica. Could easily see a few years leading the league in 3B’s.

& they have a few other guys that others have ranked- Rainier, Jaden Hamm, Jace Jung is still eligible, etc.

Overall feels like the AL Central has a lot of high ranked prospects, other than KC. Cleveland has 7 guys, White Sox have 6 with 2 top 20 SP, Minnesota has 2 top 20 guys.

bada87bingMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

McGonigle would be their #1 position player prospect for me. Nice to see Briceno fulfill his ‘pick to click’ destiny.

I also think Hao-Yu Lee was deserving to make his way on the tail end of this top 100 as well.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  bada87bing

I would put Rainer and Jung over Lee, although I’m thinking they’re both probably FV45+’s at this point.

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  bada87bing

Wouldn’t be shocked if Lee was on the Zips list- His statistical profile (stats & batted ball info) is much more exciting than his scouting- He has a weird swing & also defensive questions on where he lands, could end up in a corner somewhere, which makes the offensive bar that much higher..

Now, he DID hit in AA last year, but, there’s a chance he could end up being a short side platoon bat in a corner.

Who was the Fangraphs guy that used to have his lists of favorite underrated possible breakout prospects? I could also see Lee being one of his favorites.

Last edited 1 year ago by PC1970
PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

Carson Cistulli is the guy I was thinking of. Amazing how it pops into my head 45 minutes later.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

The Fringe Five? Carson was an acquired taste, but once you acquired it, it was hard to quit. The Fringe Five was an offshoot of his Corey Kluber Fan Club. And boy did he nail Kluber, though I’d imagine he’d hang his hat on Mookie more than anyone, rightfully so. The Blue Jays acquired the taste and came and hired him away. I miss Carson.

But for my money, the KATOH list from Chris Mitchell was the best list out there at identifying what every other list was missing. The Twins agreed. KATOH was a game changer. And then they could blend them with Kiley’s list and Dan’s list, I think it was called KATOH+ or something, but man those lists were unreal in how many “guys” they nailed, especially amongst the unheralded. It got even better when it was Kiley and Eric. Eric left too, to the Twins as well. And actually so did Kiley, he went to the Braves IIRC.

That was during the great FG exodus, in like 12 or 18 months they all left, plus Dave Cameron, Eno Sarris, and my favorite writer – not just baseball writer, favorite writer period – Jeff Sullivan. All to MLB teams like Carson. Travis Sawchik went to FiveThirtyEight, and I can’t think of who off the top of my head, but I know The Athletic poached a couple of guys too.

But yes, the Fringe Five, where Kluber, and Mookie, and JRam, and Hoskins, and Blackmon, and Semien, and a host of others were identified as the next big thing, before any other outlet. Incredible. After Carson we went through some weird Max Schrock fringe five phase with that Dusty Colorado guy chiming in about Wander Javier on every article for like 3 or 4 years hahaha, it could be an injury report to a pitcher, and he’d be there, comment 1 or 2, the other being Cave Dameron saying “Very cool.” Man, that Wander Javier bit wore on me at the time, hahaha, but it’s really funny in hindsight, his dedication to Wander was remarkable! I don’t really remember Fringe Five after Schrock headlined it for a year+, but it was something I couldn’t wait to read every week, it was my favorite recurring series on the site for sure. At least weekly recurring series, that KATOH list and then the blended lists that came from it were incredible too, there’s no bad choice in there.

Lot of talent developed and recognized here. It’d be sick if they had like a reunion AMA deal. IDK how much they can talk about their current roles and specifically players, but it’d be awesome just to hear what they’ve been doing since they left. Plus someone has GOT to ask DC the BTS on Hosmer, there’s no way he was on board with that signing, would be interesting to here what he has to say about it now that Hoz has come and gone.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I didn’t like the Jobe pick at all, but it’s worked out great so far.

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago

Yeah, I was all ticked off they passed on Mayer & Lawlar to take Jobe, but, looks like it may work out.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

He could still bust! He is still hurt a lot. He still throws really hard.

And honestly, it is baffling that somehow he isn’t getting more strikeouts when he throws a 3000 RPM breaking ball and is sitting in the mid-90s.

But also, everything could click and he could be a star. That’s a lot better than how things looked before.

slamcactusMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

While there’s absolutely such thing as a pitching prospect, Danny Hultzen proved conclusively for me that there’s no such thing as a safe pitching prospect. Even if they look like they’re knocking on the door to the bigs.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  slamcactus

I think the one who finally sold it for me was Forrest Whitley. Hultzen and Alex Reyes and many others were wrecked by injuries but Whitley went from future ace to a disaster almost overnight.

riibettMember since 2020
1 year ago

It’s a bit unfortunate that AJSS is likely going to be blocked by Grant Holmes and Ian Anderson (both out of options) but maybe a little extra AAA seasoning will be good for his development long term, idk

beanbongMember
1 year ago
Reply to  riibett

Anderson hasn’t been good since 2021 and was bad in Gwinnett last year. Holmes cleared 100 innings for the first time since 2017 last year and has spot starter/long reliever stuff. If Smith-Shawver is ready and able, I don’t think either of these two block him from a rotation spot.

Mr ManagerMember since 2019
1 year ago

You guys laugh now, but wait until the Guardians find a way to swing trades for Campbell, Made, and Celesten, and every other team in the league has to play without a 2B.

casey jMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Manager

They traded Gimenez, so have room for 6 more 2B

mills9laneMember since 2024
1 year ago

Surprised to see Waldrep drop out. As late as July 26th, Longenhagen put Waldrep in a bucket of pitchers who he said  “If you wanted to count any of the 50s I’ve mentioned so far among the 55s I wouldn’t call you crazy.” Waldrep was stuffed on here coming out of the draft and I’d say last year was a relative success. I’d certainly put him ahead of Bloss or Melton or several others on this list. I wonder if there’s some oversight here with certain guys suspiciously disappearing.

rickerbockersMember since 2022
1 year ago

Zyhir Hope is not a top 100 prospect? He’s not even listed as a top 200?

justahikerMember since 2021
1 year ago

Thank you very much for all the hard work! This is one of the most anticipated days of the baseball season. I’ll be interested in reading more about Moises Ballesteros (although I suppose I already know what that’s going to say). But when was the last time a 20-year-old hit at AAA, and wasn’t a top 100 prospect? And couldn’t crack the top 17 catchers, to boot!

justahikerMember since 2021
1 year ago
Reply to  justahiker

And I should add that I can already read more about it by looking up Eric’s top prospect page for the Chicago Cubs!

Andreas SophocleousMember since 2025
1 year ago

Thanks for this list Eric! I note the FV are not all aligned to the Fangraphs site player page. Will the latter be updated to match your list?

crackbaldoMember since 2024
1 year ago

After a decade of being terrible, it’s a little shocking to see only 2 Pirates listed above. And Ashcraft seems like a “meh.” FO has been terrible at identifying talent, generally, and hitting talent specifically. They have exactly one starter in the lineup that they drafted.

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  crackbaldo

Watching LAD take Henry Davis backup at Louisville & have him as a Top 10 overall prospect while Davis looks like a very possible bust (or at the very least a platoon corner OF) has to be an all-time kick in nuts for Pirates fans.

Player development matters..especially when you are a small market team & have a cheap ass owner like Pittsburgh does.

dodgerbleu
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

Has to be an all-time kick in the pants if you’re Henry Davis too. Or most players in the Pirate organization as well, I’d think..

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

The highlight of the offseason was trading for an already injured Spencer Horwitz!

Realistically, they could have taken Mayer and Chandler in the 21 draft and gone for signability types after. Of course, then Mayer probably doesn’t develop under this regime.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  crackbaldo

Combine creatively frugal ownership with an FO that just couldn’t identify a good hitter if they hit them in the face, and you have this current situation. What they’ve done on the pitching side might keep them employed, sadly.

badmoonMember since 2020
1 year ago

The Marcelo Mayer ranking/FV rollercoaster the past 12 months is pretty wild.

This list last year had him as a 50FV, #69 overall. Fast forward to the 7/26/24 update and he moved all the way up to to 60FV and somewhere in the top 10, because of Eric was swayed by the hitting data.

Today, he’s back to a 50FV and #57 overall. The thing is, he got hurt 3 days after that July update. Knocking him for durability concerns is totally valid, but today’s write up and downgrade seems almost totally fueled by hit tool concerns, but there’s really no further data today than they was 8 months ago when he got that 60FV.

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  badmoon

Exactly my point.

If Mayer was a 60 in July, o don’t understand how he’s a 50 today. There is pretty much no data since that ranking on Mayer, and the data that exists is good!

I get the durability thing, but that seems more like a 55 FV drop instead of 50

Last edited 1 year ago by Brock244
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  badmoon

I think probably what happened was Eric thought the hit tool problems were solved in season but when he went back to look at him this offseason he changed his mind again.

jacamosito10Member since 2024
1 year ago

No Jacob Melton after your comments about him as a ROY candidate? Surprising.

LaBellaVitaMember since 2018
1 year ago

This is exciting! The top 100! I’m looking at the roster of 2027 and beyond.

However, I must remind myself that of the folks on this list approximately:

1 quarter will wash out, never to receive much more than a cup of coffee,1 quarter will end up as backups, hoping for a PA or two more each year, and1 quarter may become regulars, but barely regulars.This leaves about a quarter of them to be above-average players, as defined as contributing around 2.5 to 3.5 fWAR annually. Maybe 1 or 2 or even 3 of them will turn out to be stars.

Place your bets!

Last edited 1 year ago by LaBellaVita
jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago

I’m shocked to see you so high on Kristian Campbell. His exit velocities are great, but he’s doing all his damage low in the zone. Because of his swing length and path, fastballs up in the zone will eat him alive as a major leaguer. I also do not believe that he has a realistic chance of sticking as an infielder, and he hits too much to straight away for him to fully utilize his power.

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Campbell is pretty much a consensus top 5 prospect as this point. Projection systems love him too, with like a 120 wRC+ 3 WAR projections over full season

Guy has good zone contact rates and PD w no statistical issue w fastballs or high pitches so I don’t agree w that analysis.

Last edited 1 year ago by Brock244
jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

Campbell is pretty much a consensus top 5 prospect as this point.

No, he really isn’t. Eric has him at #7, as does MLB, while Kiley McDaniel has him down at #26.

Guy has good zone contact rates and PD w no statistical issue w fastballs or high pitches so I don’t agree w that analysis.

This is where scouting comes in. I agree that all the stats and metrics for Campbell look great, but if you have experience with scouting players and you analyze his swing, you can see the problems coming. It isn’t an issue in AAA because those are AAA pitchers. He will not be facing AAA pitchers in the Major Leagues.

Campbell’s swing is long and low. He has a good eye and bat control, but I can’t see that swing consistently making contact on premium velocity up in the zone when he’s already showing decreased contact rates every level he moves up. Add in what I said about him hitting so much to straight away, along with concerns about lacking an obvious position, and I cannot agree with putting someone like that in the top ten, even with the acknowledgment that this is a weak-ish class.

Maybe I will be proven wrong, as has happened before, but I think this is more like the time when I was arguing that Devers was better than Moncada and Benintendi, which was also based on their respective swings.

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Pretty much every outlet has him top 10. BA, BP, MLB, FG, Law, etc. some of the BA guys saying you could argue he’s #1 prospect in baseball

Kiley is the outlier and his concerns seem a bit weird. It’s pretty much “he has an ugly swing and not many guys swing like that” which to me is not a real concern when the data doesn’t support it

Data is always more important than random stuff like that. I mean ZIPS thinks he’s a borderline star right now lol

Also he’s not just a data darling but a physical freak . Guys like that tend to have the athleticism to figure out the positional stuff (and he’s actually graded out well statically as a SS believe it or not)

Last edited 1 year ago by Brock244
jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

Pretty much every outlet has him top 10. BA, BP, MLB, FG, Law, etc

You said that “Campbell is pretty much a consensus top 5 prospect as this point.” That statement was incorrect.

Kiley is the outlier and his concerns seem a bit weird. It’s pretty much “he has an ugly swing and not many guys swing like that” which to me is not a real concern when the data doesn’t support it

Nothing about Kiley’s concern is “weird.” Kiley’s concern comes from his many years of evaluating prospects. I just explained exactly why Kiley and I have this concern about Campbell, and if you go watch video of his swing then you should be able to see the things that we are talking about.

Data is always more important than random stuff like that. I mean ZIPS thinks he’s a borderline star right now lol

If what you were saying was actually true then there would be no point in scouts existing, you could make all your prospect decisions from data alone. In reality, there are numerous prospects every year who have great data at one level, but end up disappointing at a higher level because of flaws that were only foreseeable through scouting.

Also he’s not just a data darling but a physical freak . Guys like that tend to have the athleticism to figure out the positional stuff (and he’s actually graded out well statically as a SS believe it or not)

If that were true then he wouldn’t have fallen to the fourth round 18 months ago. He lasted that long because he didn’t show plus power before his current swing, and because he did not have an obvious defensive position in college at Georgia Tech. The things Kiley and I are talking about are not new, people are just looking past them because of his incredible performance last season.

Because of those impressive numbers, I understand why people are downvoting me. They downvoted me in 2016 when I insisted that Devers was better than Moncada and Benintendi. All of them were wrong. I was correct.

Last edited 1 year ago by jdbolick
KyleMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

No one can take it away from you… That you were right in 2016?

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

Scottie Scheffler also has an ugly swing, and let us not forget Jim Furyk, one of the best golfers of the past 30 years. It is the very fact that these athletes are great despite not fitting the conventional template that separates them from the pack. They are so talented that they must be left alone to maximize their skill and do not respond to coaching. If a player is succeeding with an unusual technique the worst thing a team can do is attempt to try to alter that. Tanner Houck is an excellent example of tinkering that set him back. He had a low arm slot and a huge sweeper before that became the vogue. The Red Sox attempted to raise the arm slot and set him back several years. I am a strong believer that until it is proven that a player’s technique isn’t good enough no major changes should be attempted.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

He had a .651 wOBA on 4 seamers up in the zone, in AAA.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

The major question with Campbell is whether he has a position. That writeup makes him sound like he’s going to start at 2B but if he can’t throw from second base he’d normally go to LF. But if he can’t make good reads in the outfield he’s going to have a terrible time playing left in Fenway. Is he just going to have the world’s best range at 1B?

I think they probably should just sit him down at 2B and keep him there until it’s clear he can’t do it. Shortstop seems totally out of the question if he can’t throw at different angles. It’s a long way to him contributing anywhere else except 2B and 1B.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Agree on all points

irulz23Member since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

It looks like the thumb was on the scale to move him from a 55 to 60 to accomodate this ranking based on his Probable FV Outcome graph. I’m most interested in his move from the ’24 updated list to ’25. Only ~50 games to go from a 45+ to a 60 while rounding up the hit and game power but dropping the fielding by a full grade in the projections.

boomstickMember since 2024
1 year ago

Any of you seasoned baseball observers have a parallel example of Walcott? His glowing report sounds like what you get for a phenom going into the NBA, not a typical baseball prospect

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  boomstick

Eric alludes to this, but it’s basically the Manny Machado starter kit

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  boomstick

In baseball or elsewhere? Tatis Jr is the comp Eric gives, but he kind of came out of nowhere and Walcott was pretty well known. Maybe Bobby Witt when he got drafted (Bobby Witt was basically the same age then as Walcott was last year). Or Druw Jones (the son, not the father).

NBA prospects who are absolute freaks of nature like this usually get way more hype than this. This is not a Wembanyana or Anthony Davis type of situation, it’s more Greg Oden or Dwight Howard level of hype.

przygodaMember since 2022
1 year ago

Is JJ Wetherholt really expected to stay at short with Masyn Winn being a potential gold glover? I’ve been assuming he’s moving to second but haven’t seen anything anywhere.

DH
1 year ago

Drake Baldwin’s height is listed at 6’ 1” in this article, but everywhere else I’ve looked lists him at 5’ 10”. Has he grown or is it a typo in the article?

Thanks!

mattMember since 2023
1 year ago

Leodalis too low, his k rate lowered as year went along

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
1 year ago

Any idea what is keeping McGonigle’s hit tool from being higher than a 60? Firm contact and elite K/BB sounds like a 70.

Brock244
1 year ago

Not sure I get Mayer going from a 60 to a 50. Since the mid season ranking, he essentially 1) hit AA really well b) got hurt

There’s not much statistical reason to be lower on him now than in the summer. Maybe durability concern, but that seems like a half grade knock to a 55, not 50

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

Like, in July there was real argument for him as #1 redsox prospect. He was a 60 FV here and he looked like a stud. Then he got hurt. I get the concern w the durability but that seems like a harsh downgrade in FV

If he hits in AAA, is he a 60?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

I mean…it’s in the write up that Eric’s worried about his ability to hit breaking balls at the next level.

He’s done a good job of spitting on them so far, but that’s not necessarily sustainable – AA isn’t what it used to be, after all.

Brock244
1 year ago

Yeah but the thing is, those questions where there in the summer, so why now drop it him from a 60 to 50, when he really hasn’t played since the last updated version.

I don’t think you can be any higher/lower on Mayers profile now than in the summer, w exception to durability

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

If I had to guess, it would be that the AA breaking ball data came through after the season.

So midseason was “Yay, he’s healthy with improved peripherals!”

Now it’s “He got hurt, again…and the under the hood stuff didn’t actually get any less scary.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Cool Lester Smooth
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

CLS mostly said what I was going to say but I will just add that it’s wild how Lawlar and Mayer are still an interesting duo even now. These guys have more or less developed except for the hit tool being a bit of a question mark and a maddening inability to stay healthy.

I don’t think either one, or Jackson Jobe for that matter, are ever going to be healthy enough to be the answer to the “who should you have taken at 1” question. In fact none of the guys who were considered there (Lawlar, Mayer, Leiter, Davis, Jobe) look like they’re going to be the answer to that question. So far the answer to that question is Jackson Merrill or James Wood—both taken by the Padres after almost every other team had a shot at both of them, with Cowser behind them and Bubba Chandler, Painter, and Schwellenbach as wild cards who could finish above all of the others someday. Not how anyone thought this would go.

roysanMember since 2022
1 year ago

Why did Zyhir Hope fall off the top 100?

JimmyMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  roysan

You can’t fall off what you’ve never been on. Hope has never been above a 45+ FV here. You can look at Longenhagen’s chat today if you want to see his most up to date rationale.

NATS FanMember since 2018
1 year ago

If Bubba Chandler starts the season on the Pirates and pitches well ( sub 4 era like I expect), then Nutting should really be forced to sell the team!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Eric mentions that if Misiorowski ever gets the command to start there are no appropriate comps. The two at that come to mind are JR Richard and Kerry Wood, but since he likely isn’t going to develop that level of command I think the point is moot.

evo34Member since 2023
1 year ago

16 catchers. Over/under on how many of them become above avg regulars? 1.5 seems right.

AzizalMember since 2017
1 year ago

What happened to Hurston Waldrep? He made it from the draft to the majors in 27 starts. Surely he hasn’t dropped that much just because his cup of coffee was extremely bitter.

Marc KartmanMember since 2021
1 year ago

I’m curious what happened to Cooper Pratt. He was rated something like 68 at the end of last season and now he’s nowhere to be found.

g4Member since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Marc Kartman

Same question was asked in Eric’s chat. Since the midseason ranking, he re-looked at Pratt’s defense and is more skeptical of SS capability.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
1 year ago

My hot takes:

Over
Jake Bloss
Drake Baldwin
Alfredo Duno

Under
Lazaro Montes
Jhostynxon Garcia
Robert Calaz
Owen Cassie
Moises Ballesteros
Orelvis Martinez
Christian Moore
Michael Arroyo
Chase Meidroth
Kumar Rocker

Last edited 1 year ago by Uncle Spike