Post-Spring Training Top 100 Prospects Update

Over the past six weeks, prospects from across the league have participated in spring training activity in Arizona and Florida. Some got into big league games, or participated in the Spring Breakout showcase; others have played in minor league games on the backfields for most of the last month. This spring activity has been enough to move the prospect needle for a handful of players. With the last minor league camps set to break today and extended spring training on the horizon, I’ve touched up my Top 100 list from the offseason to reflect relevant changes that players have made, as well as changes to my own thinking about them.
As you read, there are a couple of things to keep in mind, especially if you’re new to FanGraphs prospect stuff. First, the “Top 100” title is arbitrary SEO nonsense; I rank players as deep as I have them graded as 50 FV prospects or better, and as of this update, that’s 114 guys. Second, remember that Future Value is a value grade. The tools and ultimate potential upside of a player matter a lot, as does the length and consistency of a player’s performance track record and their proximity to the majors. There are players who have talent upside better than their FV grade, but if they’re risky for whatever reason, or if they’re in the low minors, I want to reflect that risk/time element in their grade.
Finally, remember that an actualized “50” is an average everyday player at a given position. Not “average” in the sense that I’m averaging every big leaguer who played that position to create a performance baseline. Rather, “average” here means that the player would fall toward the middle of the pack when we’re talking about the top 30-ish players at their position across a multi-year window. That’s a high bar. Really excellent, tenured players tend to occupy their spot on a big league roster for long periods of time. It’s hard for prospects to crack into that All-Star-caliber group, and even harder to sustain some measure of production for six-plus years of team control. Forty- and 45-grade players are good big leaguers, too, and there are many more of them across the pro baseball talent distribution than there are 50s.
This list overwhelmingly reflects my individual evaluations and grades, with sourced opinions from scouts and executives contributing to select players where I needed to fill a gap in my viewing (living in Arizona means that I more often need to patch holes in Florida), or, in rare cases, to cross-check my thinking. The in-person looks I’ve gotten at the majority of this group over the last 13 months, plus data and video, have contributed to my conclusions.
Below you’ll find the updated list, followed by notes on who moved and why, and then a rundown of the clusters of players that formed around similar profiles throughout the list, with further commentary where appropriate. There are some instances where I think it’s more illuminating to talk about the new names in the context of their clusters. Anyone who I’ve added has had their report updated on The Board, where you can find tool grades, pitch repertoires, full scouting reports, and more. Players whose FV grade has changed have a ↑↑ or ↓↓ in the trend column of the table, with single arrows indicating that a player’s rank has changed enough to point it out, even though their grade has not.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend | Variance | ETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | Roki Sasaki | SP | 23.4 | LAD | High | 2025 | |
| 2 | 60 | Roman Anthony | RF | 20.9 | BOS | High | 2026 | |
| 3 | 60 | Dylan Crews | CF | 23.1 | WSN | Med | 2025 | |
| 4 | 60 | Sebastian Walcott | SS | 19.0 | TEX | High | 2027 | |
| 5 | 60 | Samuel Basallo | C | 20.6 | BAL | High | 2026 | |
| 6 | 60 | Andrew Painter | SP | 22.0 | PHI | High | 2025 | |
| 7 | 60 | Kristian Campbell | 2B | 22.8 | BOS | High | 2025 | |
| 8 | 60 | Dalton Rushing | C | 24.1 | LAD | Low | 2025 | |
| 9 | 60 | Jackson Jobe | SP | 22.7 | DET | Med | 2025 | |
| 10 | 60 | Carson Williams | SS | 21.8 | TBR | High | 2026 | |
| 11 | 55 | Drake Baldwin | C | 24.0 | ATL | Med | 2025 | |
| 12 | 55 | Matt Shaw | 3B | 23.4 | CHC | High | 2025 | |
| 13 | 55 | Aidan Miller | SS | 20.8 | PHI | High | 2026 | |
| 14 | 55 | Chase Dollander | SP | 23.4 | COL | Med | 2026 | |
| 15 | 55 | Quinn Mathews | SP | 24.5 | STL | ↑↑ | Low | 2025 |
| 16 | 55 | Walker Jenkins | LF | 20.1 | MIN | Med | 2026 | |
| 17 | 55 | Bubba Chandler | SP | 22.5 | PIT | High | 2025 | |
| 18 | 55 | Brandon Sproat | SP | 24.5 | NYM | Med | 2025 | |
| 19 | 55 | Jordan Lawlar | SS | 22.7 | ARI | Med | 2025 | |
| 20 | 55 | Emmanuel Rodriguez | CF | 22.1 | MIN | Med | 2025 | |
| 21 | 55 | Ethan Salas | C | 18.8 | SDP | Med | 2026 | |
| 22 | 55 | Jarlin Susana | SP | 21.0 | WSN | High | 2026 | |
| 23 | 55 | Noah Schultz | SP | 21.6 | CHW | High | 2026 | |
| 24 | 55 | Jasson Domínguez | LF | 22.1 | NYY | Med | 2025 | |
| 25 | 55 | Nick Kurtz | 1B | 22.0 | ATH | ↑↑ | Med | 2025 |
| 26 | 55 | Bryce Eldridge | 1B | 20.4 | SFG | High | 2026 | |
| 27 | 55 | Chase Burns | SP | 22.2 | CIN | High | 2025 | |
| 28 | 55 | Jacob Misiorowski | SP | 23.0 | MIL | High | 2026 | |
| 29 | 55 | Alfredo Duno | C | 19.2 | CIN | High | 2028 | |
| 30 | 50 | Marcelo Mayer | SS | 22.3 | BOS | High | 2026 | |
| 31 | 50 | Colt Emerson | SS | 19.7 | SEA | Med | 2027 | |
| 32 | 50 | Angel Genao | SS | 20.9 | CLE | High | 2027 | |
| 33 | 50 | Max Clark | CF | 20.3 | DET | Med | 2027 | |
| 34 | 50 | Kevin McGonigle | SS | 20.6 | DET | ↑ | Low | 2026 |
| 35 | 50 | Leo De Vries | SS | 18.5 | SDP | High | 2027 | |
| 36 | 50 | George Lombard Jr. | SS | 19.8 | NYY | ↑↑ | High | 2027 |
| 37 | 50 | Jesús Made | 2B | 17.9 | MIL | Med | 2028 | |
| 38 | 50 | Travis Bazzana | 2B | 22.6 | CLE | Low | 2025 | |
| 39 | 50 | Adrian Del Castillo | C | 25.5 | ARI | Med | 2025 | |
| 40 | 50 | Agustin Ramírez | C | 23.6 | MIA | High | 2025 | |
| 41 | 50 | Thayron Liranzo | C | 21.7 | DET | High | 2027 | |
| 42 | 50 | Kevin Alcántara | CF | 22.7 | CHC | High | 2025 | |
| 43 | 50 | Jac Caglianone | RF | 22.1 | KCR | High | 2026 | |
| 44 | 50 | Cam Smith | 3B | 22.1 | HOU | ↑ | High | 2027 |
| 45 | 50 | AJ Smith-Shawver | SP | 22.4 | ATL | High | 2025 | |
| 46 | 50 | Chase Petty | SP | 22.0 | CIN | High | 2025 | |
| 47 | 50 | Chase DeLauter | RF | 23.5 | CLE | Med | 2025 | |
| 48 | 50 | Coby Mayo | 1B | 23.3 | BAL | High | 2025 | |
| 49 | 50 | Zyhir Hope | RF | 20.2 | LAD | ↑↑ | High | 2028 |
| 50 | 50 | Kyle Teel | C | 23.1 | CHW | Low | 2026 | |
| 51 | 50 | Luke Keaschall | CF | 22.6 | MIN | High | 2027 | |
| 52 | 50 | Josue Briceño | C | 20.5 | DET | High | 2027 | |
| 53 | 50 | Jackson Ferris | SP | 21.2 | LAD | ↑↑ | High | 2027 |
| 54 | 50 | Hagen Smith | SP | 21.6 | CHW | ↓↓ | Med | 2025 |
| 55 | 50 | Thomas White | SP | 20.5 | MIA | High | 2027 | |
| 56 | 50 | Jacob Wilson | SS | 23.0 | ATH | Med | 2025 | |
| 57 | 50 | Cooper Ingle | C | 23.1 | CLE | Med | 2027 | |
| 58 | 50 | JJ Wetherholt | SS | 22.6 | STL | Low | 2026 | |
| 59 | 50 | Jake Bloss | SP | 23.8 | TOR | Low | 2025 | |
| 60 | 50 | Parker Messick | SP | 24.4 | CLE | Low | 2026 | |
| 61 | 50 | Rhett Lowder | SP | 23.1 | CIN | Low | 2025 | |
| 62 | 50 | Will Warren | SP | 25.8 | NYY | Low | 2025 | |
| 63 | 50 | Richard Fitts | SP | 25.3 | BOS | ↑↑ | Low | 2025 |
| 64 | 50 | Cade Horton | SP | 23.6 | CHC | High | 2025 | |
| 65 | 50 | Joe Mack | C | 22.3 | MIA | High | 2026 | |
| 66 | 50 | Alex Freeland | SS | 23.6 | LAD | ↓ | Low | 2025 |
| 67 | 50 | Colson Montgomery | SS | 23.1 | CHW | High | 2025 | |
| 68 | 50 | Carter Jensen | C | 21.7 | KCR | High | 2027 | |
| 69 | 50 | Jefferson Rojas | SS | 19.9 | CHC | Med | 2027 | |
| 70 | 50 | Arjun Nimmala | SS | 19.5 | TOR | High | 2028 | |
| 71 | 50 | Konnor Griffin | CF | 18.9 | PIT | ↑↑ | High | 2028 |
| 72 | 50 | Josue De Paula | LF | 19.8 | LAD | ↓ | Med | 2027 |
| 73 | 50 | Felnin Celesten | 2B | 19.5 | SEA | High | 2029 | |
| 74 | 50 | Kumar Rocker | SP | 25.4 | TEX | High | 2025 | |
| 75 | 50 | Yoniel Curet | SP | 22.4 | TBR | High | 2025 | |
| 76 | 50 | Caden Dana | SP | 21.3 | LAA | ↓↓ | Med | 2025 |
| 77 | 50 | Chandler Simpson | CF | 24.4 | TBR | Med | 2025 | |
| 78 | 50 | Jurrangelo Cijntje | SP | 21.8 | SEA | ↑↑ | Med | 2026 |
| 79 | 50 | Welbyn Francisca | SS | 18.9 | CLE | ↑ | High | 2029 |
| 80 | 50 | Grant Taylor | SP | 22.9 | CHW | Low | 2026 | |
| 81 | 50 | Brody Hopkins | SP | 23.2 | TBR | High | 2026 | |
| 82 | 50 | Alan Roden | LF | 25.3 | TOR | ↑↑ | Med | 2027 |
| 83 | 50 | Edgar Quero | C | 22.0 | CHW | Low | 2025 | |
| 84 | 50 | Juan Brito | 2B | 23.5 | CLE | Med | 2025 | |
| 85 | 50 | Cole Young | SS | 21.7 | SEA | Low | 2025 | |
| 86 | 50 | Braxton Ashcraft | SP | 25.5 | PIT | Med | 2025 | |
| 87 | 50 | Gunnar Hoglund | SP | 25.3 | ATH | ↑↑ | Med | 2025 |
| 88 | 50 | Logan Henderson | SP | 23.1 | MIL | ↑↑ | High | 2025 |
| 89 | 50 | Troy Melton | SP | 24.3 | DET | Med | 2026 | |
| 90 | 50 | Jonah Tong | SP | 21.8 | NYM | ↑↑ | Med | 2027 |
| 91 | 50 | Jedixson Paez | SP | 21.2 | BOS | Low | 2026 | |
| 92 | 50 | Jimmy Crooks | C | 23.7 | STL | Med | 2026 | |
| 93 | 50 | Tre’ Morgan | 1B | 22.7 | TBR | Low | 2026 | |
| 94 | 50 | Starlyn Caba | SS | 19.3 | MIA | Med | 2028 | |
| 95 | 50 | George Klassen | SP | 23.2 | LAA | High | 2025 | |
| 96 | 50 | Yilber Diaz | SP | 24.6 | ARI | High | 2025 | |
| 97 | 50 | Moisés Chace | SP | 21.8 | PHI | ↓ | High | 2025 |
| 98 | 50 | Carson Whisenhunt | SP | 24.4 | SFG | Med | 2025 | |
| 99 | 50 | Luis Morales | SP | 22.5 | ATH | High | 2027 | |
| 100 | 50 | Tai Peete | CF | 19.6 | SEA | High | 2028 | |
| 101 | 50 | Jett Williams | CF | 21.4 | NYM | High | 2026 | |
| 102 | 50 | Jaison Chourio | CF | 19.9 | CLE | ↑↑ | Med | 2027 |
| 103 | 50 | Luis Mey | SIRP | 23.8 | CIN | ↑↑ | High | 2025 |
| 104 | 50 | Xavier Isaac | 1B | 21.3 | TBR | High | 2026 | |
| 105 | 50 | Noble Meyer | SP | 20.2 | MIA | High | 2027 | |
| 106 | 50 | Jeferson Quero | C | 22.5 | MIL | High | 2025 | |
| 107 | 50 | Jonny Farmelo | CF | 20.6 | SEA | High | 2028 | |
| 108 | 50 | Travis Sykora | SP | 20.9 | WSN | High | 2027 | |
| 109 | 50 | Chayce McDermott | SP | 26.6 | BAL | High | 2025 | |
| 110 | 50 | Tink Hence | SP | 22.6 | STL | High | 2025 | |
| 111 | 50 | Edgardo Henriquez | SIRP | 22.8 | LAD | High | 2025 | |
| 112 | 50 | Ricky Tiedemann | SP | 22.6 | TOR | High | 2026 | |
| 113 | 50 | River Ryan | SP | 26.6 | LAD | Med | 2026 | |
| 114 | 50 | Alejandro Rosario | SP | 23.2 | TEX | High | 2026 |
Hitters Who Moved Into the 50 FV Tier
George Lombard Jr., SS, New York Yankees
Zyhir Hope, RF, Los Angeles Dodgers
Konnor Griffin, CF, Pittsburgh Pirates
Alan Roden, RF, Toronto Blue Jays
Jaison Chourio, CF, Cleveland Guardians
George Lombard Jr. showed up to camp looking much stronger and with a totally different level of power, enough to counter his below-average contact ability if it turns out he’s still whiff-prone like he was last season. There’s a chance the added strength has also made him better able to move the barrel around. I wrote a ton about Zyhir Hope in his updated scouting report on The Board and you’re encouraged to check that out, as well as my freshly cut video of him. The highlights: Hope, who turned 20 in January, has gained 40 pounds in the year and a half since he signed and is now 5-foot-10, 230 pounds; most of the added mass is muscle. He has strikeout risk, and the way he’ll trend physically is tough to peg. But his speed at his size is remarkable, and his power is likely to play in part because Hope has such short levers. His report reads a lot like lower-minors Jasson Domínguez and Hope has now hit for a month against a better class of pitching than he saw late in last year’s Cal and Fall Leagues. I wrote about Konnor Griffin’s swing changes and encouraging early-career look in center field on the Pirates prospect list. You’ll find more on Alan Roden in his cluster below. Jaison Chourio is running better for me this spring than before, with plus times that indicate he has a better shot to stay in center field than I gave him during the offseason. He’s still driving the ball into the ground an awful lot, but the quality of his at-bats and his ability to grind and battle until he either walks or gets a mistake to hit is special.
Pitchers Who Moved Into the 50 FV Tier
Jackson Ferris, LHP, Los Angeles Dodgers
Richard Fitts, RHP, Boston Red Sox
Gunnar Hoglund, RHP, Sacramento Athletics
Logan Henderson, RHP, Milwaukee Brewers
Jonah Tong, RHP, New York Mets
Luis Mey, RHP, Cincinnati Reds
Jurrangelo Cijntje, SHP, Seattle Mariners
Several of these pitchers are throwing harder this spring. Jackson Ferris’ fastball averaged 93.5 mph last year but has more often been in the 94-96 mph range early in 2025. It has uphill plane, and opposing upper-level hitters, including big leaguers, have had trouble parsing his delivery. Richard Fitts (up three and half ticks, topping out at 99) and Gunnar Hoglund (91.5 mph last year, 93-97 mph right now) previously had lower-impact starter skill sets but look like mid-rotation types at their new velocities. Logan Henderson now has an average curveball to go with his usual plus fastball and changeup. It’s enough of a breaking ball to give him fourth starter projection, and he may clearly be one of Milwaukee’s best five starters in just a few weeks if he can sustain the 94-96 mph heat I’ve seen from him this month. He was 95-97 early last year, too, and ended up sitting in the 92-94 range after dealing with oblique issues.
Jonah Tong showed up to camp looking stronger and is no longer so frail as to doubt that he can work 150-ish innings year after year. Though he had one three-walk meltdown during a big league spring training game, Luis Mey has thrown strikes for me the last several times I’ve seen him, dating back to last year’s Arizona Fall League. I’ve seen him touch 102 with hellacious tail this spring. He looks primed to play a role at the back of the Reds bullpen this year, especially with Alexis Díaz already on the shelf. The switch-pitching Jurrangelo Cijntje has been up to 99 as a righty and has a four-pitch mix from that side. He enters pro ball with a nearly 100-inning foundation, and his secondary stuff is evolving as Cijntje works more with a changeup against opposite-handed hitters and incorporates a new slider he added this spring.
Slid a Grade
Hagen Smith, LHP, Chicago White Sox
Caden Dana, RHP, Los Angeles Angels
Both of these guys have struggled to throw strikes this spring. In Hagen Smith’s case, he has been apt to lean on his excellent slider as he falls behind and becomes very predictable as a result. Things for Smith are not as severe as when Asa Lacy started to show warning signs that he couldn’t throw strikes, but like Lacy, Smith has been more often walk-prone than not when you look at his entire college career rather than just the final season. The consequences of falling behind in pro ball are more severe, and Smith experienced that this spring. In Caden Dana’s case, I’m growing worried his 2024 (which included a career-low walk rate) was an anomaly, rather than part of an improving trend in his ability to throw strikes. The shape of his fastball requires him to be fairly precise with his location, and he has been far from that early this year. His durability and breaking ball quality still have him in the no. 4 starter bucket.
Now I’ll take you through the update top to bottom, starting with the upper-echelon FV tiers, and then turning to the 50 FV players, where I’ve highlighted clusters of prospects with similar characteristics or profiles. Some of the groupings will be pretty self-explanatory, while others merit additional discussion. Remember, you can see scouting reports and tool grades for all of these players on The Board if you want additional detail on why players are evaluated and ranked the way they are.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | Roki Sasaki | SP | 23.4 | LAD |
Roki Sasaki’s fastball has lost some vertical movement compared to his NPB fastball (it hovered around 15 inches in the below outing), and he’s scattering his stuff more than he is commanding it. Either of those issues could be attributed to the nuanced differences between the MLB baseball and the NPB sphere, which he’ll probably (hopefully) adjust to over time. Sasaki is a 23-year-old who is still touching 101 mph, and his all-world splitter (which sometimes comes out of his hand with the gentle forward tumble of a mid-80s knuckleball) has been every bit as nasty as advertised. His slider is a little better now than when he was with Chiba Lotte, and he still looks like the best “prospect” in baseball this year even though he didn’t throw strikes the other night.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 60 | Roman Anthony | RF | 20.9 | BOS |
| 3 | 60 | Dylan Crews | CF | 23.1 | WSN |
| 4 | 60 | Sebastian Walcott | SS | 19.0 | TEX |
| 5 | 60 | Samuel Basallo | C | 20.6 | BAL |
| 6 | 60 | Andrew Painter | SP | 22.0 | PHI |
| 7 | 60 | Kristian Campbell | 2B | 22.8 | BOS |
| 8 | 60 | Dalton Rushing | C | 24.1 | LAD |
| 9 | 60 | Jackson Jobe | SP | 22.7 | DET |
| 10 | 60 | Carson Williams | SS | 21.8 | TBR |
This group has held serve across the board this spring. Roman Anthony and Dylan Crews are big league-ready toolsheds who’ve performed throughout the minors. If Crews’ center field defense were playing to the level of his pure speed, he’d be ahead of Anthony. After them are Sebastian Walcott and Samuel Basallo, the odds-on favorites to be the top two prospects on this list by mid-season and beyond (assuming the graduations of the fellas ahead of them); each of them has a chance to be a 65 or 70 FV prospect 12 months from now. Basallo is throwing well again after his arm backed up a little bit last season. Andrew Painter will start to see game action during extended spring training; he’s starting the season on a delay so his innings limit can coincide with the end of the season and a potential Phillies playoff run. Kristian Campbell’s ultimate defensive position is still unsettled, but even if he ends up being hidden in left field, he’s going to rake enough to be a star anyway. Friend of the ‘Graph Jake Mintz of Yahoo! Sports comp’d Campbell’s swing to that of a young Yuli Gurriel, and I’m jealous for not having thought of that myself. Campbell broke camp with the big league club.
I’ve spent a lot of time on the Dodgers’ complex this spring (for reasons you’ll soon read), and Dalton Rushing has continued to look like an All-Star catcher who does everything well. Another friend of the ‘Graph, Lance Brozdowski, wrote on his Substack that he’s worried Jackson Jobe’s bat-missing ability might settle below the aggregate projections because Jobe’s delivery is easy for hitters to time. It’s an interesting observation, and I think it’s the sort of thing that prevents Jobe from having quite the same ceiling as Painter, but I also think the command piece of Jobe’s profile will be sharp enough for him to consistently be a 3-WAR type of starter. And finally, Carson Williams rounds out this tier because I have the least confidence in his hit tool of this group. What he brings in every other area is sensational, however.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 55 | Drake Baldwin | C | 24.0 | ATL | |
| 12 | 55 | Matt Shaw | 3B | 23.4 | CHC | |
| 13 | 55 | Aidan Miller | SS | 20.8 | PHI | |
| 16 | 55 | Walker Jenkins | LF | 20.1 | MIN | |
| 19 | 55 | Jordan Lawlar | SS | 22.7 | ARI | |
| 20 | 55 | Emmanuel Rodriguez | CF | 22.1 | MIN | |
| 21 | 55 | Ethan Salas | C | 18.8 | SDP | |
| 24 | 55 | Jasson Domínguez | LF | 22.1 | NYY | |
| 25 | 55 | Nick Kurtz | 1B | 22.0 | ATH | ↑↑ |
| 26 | 55 | Bryce Eldridge | 1B | 20.4 | SFG | |
| 29 | 55 | Alfredo Duno | C | 19.2 | CIN |
As with the preseason list, this group kicks off with Braves catcher Drake Baldwin and Cubs third baseman Matt Shaw, two well-rounded, big league-ready above-average regulars who both broke camp with their big club. They are tracking in line with projections. Phillies shortstop prospect Aidan Miller has looked a little better defensively this spring. He’s tracking like he’ll be a top no. 3-5 overall prospect within the year as players ahead of him graduate. Twins outfielder Walker Jenkins, a very well-rounded player with elite feel for the strike zone, is in that mix, too, but injuries have limited his track record, so he’s a few slots behind the Baldwin/Shaw/Miller group right now.
The next cluster of players features plus or better defenders at premium positions, and they either have power right now (Twins center fielder Emmanuel Rodriguez), or have good long-term power projection (Diamondbacks shortstop Jordan Lawlar and Padres catcher Ethan Salas) but are probably going to strike out quite a bit. Reds catcher Alfredo Duno is an even more extreme version of this profile. He has a nutty power/speed/arm toolset for his age. Injuries and lost playing time (especially on defense) mean that he’s currently sushi raw, but he has a shot to be a four- or five-tool catcher, with the hit tool being the volatile variable.
There hasn’t been much change to any of the grades of the upper echelon guys compared to my pre-season list, but one of the exceptions is A’s first baseman Nick Kurtz, who has climbed into this tier. Kurtz has continued to look like a heart-of-the-order force, and it has come against a better class of pitching than he faced last year. No offense to the pitchers in last year’s Arizona Fall League, but well-rested upper-level and big league arms have much better stuff than they did, and Kurtz has performed seamlessly against them this spring. He and Bryce Eldridge (more power projection, less contact ability and worse defense) are in a tier of their own among the first base prospects across baseball, but they are first base prospects and the bar for offensive performance at that position is very high. Jasson Domínguez stacks with those two because, as a bad left fielder, he is essentially also a bottom-of-the-spectrum defender with enough of a contact/power combo to be a good player anyway.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 55 | Chase Dollander | SP | 23.4 | COL | |
| 15 | 55 | Quinn Mathews | SP | 24.5 | STL | ↑↑ |
| 17 | 55 | Bubba Chandler | SP | 22.5 | PIT | |
| 18 | 55 | Brandon Sproat | SP | 24.5 | NYM | |
| 22 | 55 | Jarlin Susana | SP | 21.0 | WSN | |
| 23 | 55 | Noah Schultz | SP | 21.6 | CHW | |
| 27 | 55 | Chase Burns | SP | 22.2 | CIN | |
| 28 | 55 | Jacob Misiorowski | SP | 23.0 | MIL |
Cardinals lefty Quinn Mathews moves into this tier, as he’s retained his velo spike from last season and has shoved this spring, including against big leaguers. I have Mathews and Rockies starter Chase Dollander separated a tad from the rest of the big league-ready pitchers in this tier because they have superior command and fastball shape compared to the others. I’ve re-ordered a couple of the pitchers toward the back of the 55 FV tier to lean on proximity, with Pirates right-hander Bubba Chandler and Mets right-hander Brandon Sproat, who both look ready for primetime, sliding ahead of Nationals righty Jarlin Susana and White Sox lefty Noah Schultz, who have huge long-term upside but are further away. Schultz has still had fastball playability issues this spring, while Susana’s command is still a little loose. The high-variance risk/upside profiles of Susana and Schultz are similar to that of Padres catcher Ethan Salas, with whom they now stack on the overall list.
Reds righty Chase Burns and Brewers righty Jacob Misiorowski have a little more relief risk than the rest of this contingent, but their peak stuff is nasty enough that if things click for them from a command standpoint, they (along with Susana and Schultz) could be in the 60 FV tier a year from now. Here’s Burns’ final spring outing from a couple days ago, when he was 98-101 with natural cut and a plus-plus slider.
Now let’s turn to the clusters of 50 FV players.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 50 | Marcelo Mayer | SS | 22.3 | BOS | |
| 31 | 50 | Colt Emerson | SS | 19.7 | SEA | |
| 32 | 50 | Angel Genao | SS | 20.9 | CLE | |
| 33 | 50 | Max Clark | CF | 20.3 | DET | |
| 34 | 50 | Kevin McGonigle | SS | 20.6 | DET | ↑ |
| 35 | 50 | Leo De Vries | SS | 18.5 | SDP | |
| 36 | 50 | George Lombard Jr. | SS | 19.8 | NYY | ↑↑ |
| 37 | 50 | Jesús Made | 2B | 17.9 | MIL | |
| 38 | 50 | Travis Bazzana | 2B | 22.6 | CLE |
Drop any of the players in this cluster into the draft and they’d be a threat to go first overall. By virtue of prospect graduations naturally occurring ahead of them, the players here are all in position to be ranked closer to 15th overall by the end of the season. Marcelo Mayer sits atop this cluster because of both his proximity to the majors and his power. I still worry too much about his issues with secondary stuff to have 55’d him. Colt Emerson and Angel Genao have the most overt physical projection and power potential of the remaining names. You can find my thoughts on Max Clark on the Tigers list from earlier this month. Kevin McGonigle has performed well this spring against better pitching than he faced last year, when he generated video game TrackMan data against mostly Low-A pitching. His power ceiling is fairly limited due to his size, but his contact ability is the best of this group. Leo De Vries and George Lombard Jr. are power-over-hit types. Jesús Made is a 70 athlete with plus bat speed from both sides of the plate. He’s got a smedium frame right now, and will break camp with the Brewers’ Low-A Carolina roster. Travis Bazzana is the worst defender of this bunch but still looks like a quick-moving everyday second baseman. The players here are easily the ones most likely to trend into the 55 and 60 FV tiers throughout this season.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | 50 | Adrian Del Castillo | C | 25.5 | ARI | |
| 40 | 50 | Agustin Ramírez | C | 23.6 | MIA | |
| 41 | 50 | Thayron Liranzo | C | 21.7 | DET |
I like the offensive potential of these players enough that, in the event that any of them ends up at 1B/DH, I still think they’ll be productive everyday options.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 50 | Kevin Alcántara | CF | 22.7 | CHC | |
| 43 | 50 | Jac Caglianone | RF | 22.1 | KCR | |
| 44 | 50 | Cam Smith | RF/3B | 22.1 | HOU | ↑ |
| 47 | 50 | Chase DeLauter | RF | 23.5 | CLE | |
| 48 | 50 | Coby Mayo | 1B | 23.3 | BAL | |
| 49 | 50 | Zyhir Hope | RF | 20.2 | LAD | ↑↑ |
Jac Caglianone is the hitter from this group with the best chance to take a leap into the upper tiers throughout the year. His at-bat quality this spring has been better than his chase-prone prior seasons, and his swing looks a little shorter. His spring has been amazing, but Cam Smith isn’t really pulling the ball, and that’s something to watch as he faces big league velocity every day. Chase DeLauter doesn’t have strikeout risk so much as there’s risk associated with his injury history. Coby Mayo struck out in half his Grapefruit League at-bats. Hope has been on a real heater for the last two weeks of camp and homered again for me on Saturday. After the game, Zyhir had hauled all of his gear most of the way back to the team’s facility when a little kid who had made him a custom t-shirt called him back for a picture. He walked all the way back, accepted the shirt with delight, spent some time with the kid and his family, took a picture, and made everyone’s day.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 50 | AJ Smith-Shawver | SP | 22.4 | ATL | |
| 46 | 50 | Chase Petty | SP | 22.0 | CIN | |
| 53 | 50 | Jackson Ferris | SP | 21.2 | LAD | ↑↑ |
| 54 | 50 | Hagen Smith | SP | 21.6 | CHW | ↓↓ |
| 55 | 50 | Thomas White | SP | 20.5 | MIA |
Chase Petty and AJ Smith-Shawver are premium athletes with huge stuff that plays down a bit due to their command, which is unpolished at present. Based on the level of their athleticism, I’d expect bigger seasons backloaded during their years of team control, with messier seasons on the front end. Jackson Ferris has had a velo spike (more in his blurb and above); now let’s see if he can sustain improved command. Hagen Smith’s strikes have backed up this spring. Thomas White arguably has the best ceiling of this group, but he’s also the farthest away from making his debut.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 50 | Kyle Teel | C | 23.1 | CHW | |
| 51 | 50 | Luke Keaschall | CF | 22.6 | MIN | |
| 52 | 50 | Josue Briceño | C | 20.5 | DET |
Kyle Teel’s foggy defensive projection is more about how many other catchers are in Chicago’s upper-level mix right now than his abilities. Luke Keaschall and Josue Briceño are coming off injury. Healthy Briceño was a promising defensive catcher, while healthy Keaschall was a bad second baseman trying to learn the outfield.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 50 | Jacob Wilson | SS | 23.0 | ATH | |
| 57 | 50 | Cooper Ingle | C | 23.1 | CLE | |
| 58 | 50 | JJ Wetherholt | SS | 22.6 | STL |
This was Kevin McGonigle’s group prior to his spring. JJ Wetherholt has the best shot to leap out of this cluster next.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | 50 | Jake Bloss | SP | 23.8 | TOR | |
| 60 | 50 | Parker Messick | SP | 24.4 | CLE | |
| 61 | 50 | Rhett Lowder | SP | 23.1 | CIN | |
| 62 | 50 | Will Warren | SP | 25.8 | NYY | |
| 63 | 50 | Richard Fitts | SP | 25.3 | BOS | ↑↑ |
| 64 | 50 | Cade Horton | SP | 23.6 | CHC |
This group is structured with the dudes who have better fastball playability at the top and the 45-grade command types toward the back.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 50 | Joe Mack | C | 22.3 | MIA | |
| 66 | 50 | Alex Freeland | SS | 23.6 | LAD | ↓ |
| 67 | 50 | Colson Montgomery | SS | 23.1 | CHW | |
| 68 | 50 | Carter Jensen | C | 21.7 | KCR |
Joe Mack tops this group because he’s pretty easily the best defender of the bunch, a potential Gold Glove catcher. Alex Freeland slides from the “Everyday Middle Infielder” group because he looked wholly overmatched against big league pitching this spring.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 50 | Jefferson Rojas | SS | 19.9 | CHC | |
| 70 | 50 | Arjun Nimmala | SS | 19.5 | TOR | |
| 71 | 50 | Konnor Griffin | CF | 18.9 | PIT | ↑↑ |
| 72 | 50 | Josue De Paula | LF | 19.8 | LAD | ↓ |
| 73 | 50 | Felnin Celesten | 2B | 19.5 | SEA |
As self-explanatory as any cluster. Josue De Paula slid a bit in the rankings because I’ve been waiting and waiting for him to absolutely smoke a ball in front of me, and it just hasn’t happened.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 50 | Kumar Rocker | SP | 25.4 | TEX | |
| 75 | 50 | Yoniel Curet | SP | 22.4 | TBR | |
| 76 | 50 | Caden Dana | SP | 21.3 | LAA | ↓↓ |
| 80 | 50 | Grant Taylor | SP | 22.9 | CHW | |
| 81 | 50 | Brody Hopkins | SP | 23.2 | TBR |
Grant Taylor has been up to 101 mph this spring and will show you four plus pitches. He arguably has the most upside of this group, but by far the shortest track record.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 50 | Chandler Simpson | CF | 24.4 | TBR | |
| 78 | 50 | Jurrangelo Cijntje | SP | 21.8 | SEA | ↑↑ |
| 79 | 50 | Welbyn Francisca | SS | 18.9 | CLE | ↑ |
| 90 | 50 | Jonah Tong | SP | 21.8 | NYM | ↑↑ |
| 91 | 50 | Jedixson Paez | SP | 21.2 | BOS |
Welbyn Francisca has freaky hand-eye and bat-to-ball talent, and has looked better at shortstop this spring than he did last year. Jonah Tong is a unicorn because of his nutty fastball ride and “due north” arm slot. His secondary stuff looks better this spring than it did last year. In my Breakout game look at Cijntje, he pitched lefty to Travis Bazzana and then righty to everyone else, including Guardians switch-hitters who are worse as righties. I wonder if, rather than Jurrangelo switch which arm he’s using throughout his starts, he could work exclusively right-handed as a starter and then come out of the bullpen as a lefty specialist in between his turns in the rotation? This would allow Cijntje’s gift to play at the big league level even if his right-handed pitch mix ends up being so much better than his lefty pallet that it basically never makes sense for him to choose to pitch lefty.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 50 | Alan Roden | LF | 25.3 | TOR | ↑↑ |
| 83 | 50 | Edgar Quero | C | 22.0 | CHW | |
| 84 | 50 | Juan Brito | 2B | 23.5 | CLE | |
| 85 | 50 | Cole Young | SS | 21.7 | SEA |
These guys are all basically ready for the bigs and are good, if low-ceiling’d, hitters. I’d be surprised if any of them turns into a 55 or better, but I’d be just as surprised if any of them turns into a 40. The way Roden’s hands work causes his bat path to be flat, which really lets him cover the top of the strike zone. It results in Roden making some concessions against well-located breaking stuff at the bottom of the zone, which he often drove into the ground last year. He’s dipping deeper into his lower body against those pitches this spring, giving him a better chance to do damage against them. Multiple scouts I spoke with have everyday grades on Roden based on their looks this spring.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | 50 | Braxton Ashcraft | SP | 25.5 | PIT | |
| 87 | 50 | Gunnar Hoglund | SP | 25.3 | ATH | ↑↑ |
| 88 | 50 | Logan Henderson | SP | 23.1 | MIL | ↑↑ |
| 89 | 50 | Troy Melton | SP | 24.3 | DET |
From a talent standpoint, this group is similar to the Warren/Lowder/Messick, etc. striation above, but they’ve all dealt with frequent and/or recent injury.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92 | 50 | Jimmy Crooks | C | 23.7 | STL | |
| 93 | 50 | Tre’ Morgan | 1B | 22.7 | TBR | |
| 94 | 50 | Starlyn Caba | SS | 19.3 | MIA |
Am I missing a center fielder who belongs in this mix? Sources, get at me on that in April, please.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 50 | George Klassen | SP | 23.2 | LAA | |
| 96 | 50 | Yilber Diaz | SP | 24.6 | ARI | |
| 97 | 50 | Moisés Chace | SP | 21.8 | PHI | ↓ |
| 98 | 50 | Carson Whisenhunt | SP | 24.4 | SFG | |
| 99 | 50 | Luis Morales | SP | 22.5 | ATH | |
| 103 | 50 | Luis Mey | SIRP | 23.8 | CIN | ↑↑ |
Moisés Chace came to camp out of shape and with less velocity. Carson Whisenhunt’s breaking ball looked a little better this spring. Mey started in just one pro season (2019) and has since been developed solely as a reliever. You can quibble with the way pure relievers should be “valued” in this exercise, but I think reasonable folks would agree we’d want to have guys like Edwin Díaz absolutely stuffed in the top 20 of a Top 100 list, and I think you can make a case toward the back of the list for guys on the set-up man/closer line, like Tanner Scott and José Alvarado have tended to be, especially when they’re on the doorstep of the big leagues as Mey is.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 50 | Tai Peete | CF | 19.6 | SEA | |
| 101 | 50 | Jett Williams | CF | 21.4 | NYM | |
| 102 | 50 | Jaison Chourio | CF | 19.9 | CLE | ↑↑ |
Improved center field defense would help allow each member of this group to continue to have an offensive flaw (for Tai Peete, it’s strikeouts; for Jett Williams and Jaison Chourio, it’s a lack of in-game power) and still profile.
| Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | Team | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104 | 50 | Xavier Isaac | 1B | 21.3 | TBR | |
| 105 | 50 | Noble Meyer | SP | 20.2 | MIA | |
| 106 | 50 | Jeferson Quero | C | 22.5 | MIL | |
| 107 | 50 | Jonny Farmelo | CF | 20.6 | SEA | |
| 108 | 50 | Travis Sykora | SP | 20.9 | WSN | |
| 109 | 50 | Chayce McDermott | SP | 26.6 | BAL | |
| 110 | 50 | Tink Hence | SP | 22.6 | STL | |
| 111 | 50 | Edgardo Henriquez | SIRP | 22.8 | LAD | |
| 112 | 50 | Ricky Tiedemann | SP | 22.6 | TOR | |
| 113 | 50 | River Ryan | SP | 26.6 | LAD | |
| 114 | 50 | Alejandro Rosario | SP | 23.2 | TEX |
Xavier Isaac (strikeouts) and Nobel Meyer (walks) are the distressed fellas in this cluster. Six to eight weeks is a good window to give those guys before re-assessment. Jeferson Quero (shoulder surgery) is back but struggled this spring. He probably deserves at least a month or two to get right, though his situation is more complicated because he’s on Milwaukee’s 40-man roster. Jonny Farmelo (2024 torn ACL), Travis Sykora (offseason hip surgery), Chayce McDermott (lat strain), Tink Hence (strained rib cage), and Edgardo Henriquez (broken foot) should be back this year. Alejandro Rosario, River Ryan, and Ricky Tiedemann are all coming off TJ, with Tiedemann the closest of those three to returning.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Small correction: Roki Sasaki played in Chiba, not Hokkaido.
Gah, indeed. Thanks!
Completely out on Charlie Condon based off 109 plate appearances?
He didn’t have him in the original top 100, so there is no reason to think he’d have him on this one.
Ah, looks like I was looking at the Updated 2024 list earlier. Thanks.
Brian Cashman very rarely gets hosed in a trade – many of his worst ones were a wash for the other side as well – but Fitts+ for Verdugo is already hurting and could get worse. Fitts would be NYY’s #4 starter right now. Instead they’re giving those starts to *shudder* Cookie Carrasco.
I don’t think Richard Fitts comes back to haunt them too badly. The Yankees are typically a great run prevention team. And Carrasco may just make 1-2 starts until Schmidt is ready. It would be nice to have Fitts as depth but he doesn’t really fit Yankee Stadium as a flyball pitcher who doesn’t have an out pitch for lefties. He’s probably a 1-2ish win guy and eh, I won’t get worked up over that given his poor fit for Yankee Stadium.
Edit: He’d be their #5 starter behind Fried, Rodon, Stroman, and Warren. And even then, I’m not sure they’d throw him ahead of Carrasco. Even with his fastball velocity improvements, I don’t think the Yankees would think much of him and he’d be a goner at the trade deadline.
We should also wait until July/August to see if this velocity spike has stuck around. It’s possible the extra tick fades away during the season
Regardless of how good they are at preventing runs in a general sense, if Fitts is really a mid-rotation starter, trading him for one year of Verdugo is a fairly disastrous trade. Mind you, not the most disastrous trade Verdugo has been a part of, but still very bad.
That’s true. There is an opportunity cost to these trades as well. They could’ve moved him in a different trade. I simply don’t rate him that highly. Even with an extra tick on his FB it’s very hittable. I think he’s a swingman type. I think he’s like a 6 or 7K/9 kind of pitcher. Which actually makes you more of a fit as an SP because that’s unplayable as a reliever unless you get like 60% GBs.
We’re moving prospects based on 8 spring training innings now? Interesting.
“We”? This isn’t a group project. You’re free to make your own list. That’s the rational way of looking at it.
Weird response. I find reranking prospects after spring to be driven solely by article clicks and generating views because no true talent evaluator is going to move a guys FV based on 8 innings. Why? Because there’s nothing predictive and Because no one has any idea what player directives are in spring.
Eric is quoted saying “I think 2024 is an anomaly” because of a few spring innings. That’s insane to me.
Hagen smith threw 8 pro innings last year and walked two. In spring he through 8 and walked 8. Why would anyone weight either of those data sets with any sort of significance?
Let’s remember ” ” are for quotes, not for crediting your paraphrase.
Because it’s about scouting, not number of innings.
Not to mention stuff like George Lombard showing up with big league exit velocity after not having the physicality for Low-A last year.
He’s not just looking at stat lines in those 8 innings, though. Swing changes, velo bumps/declines, increase/decrease in speed, body changing, command, etc.
For some of these guys, it may be the first time he’s seen them in a while, so incorporating that new data is totally logical to update his rankings.
& if you notice, most of the changes were pretty minor. Raising/lowering a player a level or 5-10 spots. Not like he’s making wholesale ranking changes based solely on this.
In some cases, ok I guess… but then there’s this sentence:
“In Caden Dana’s case, I’m growing worried his 2024 (which included a career-low walk rate) was an anomaly, rather than part of an improving trend in his ability to throw strikes”
He threw 150 innings last year. He threw 5 in spring. How could one possibly consider those 5 innings as telling while dismissing the 150 prior?
& the next sentence he mentions his concerns of his fastball shape (which he also mentioned in the LAA Prospects write up & top 100 write up..pretty consistent message here) & whether he needs to be too precise due to that & whether he can do so …& then says he still think’s he a good 4th starter type prospect.
He’s not dismissing the 150 innings, but, saw add’l information this spring that gave him pause. Overreaction? Maybe..maybe he got too excited & bumped him too high after last year & seeing him this spring made him realize that.
He dropped him from 55 to 50 ranking & from #25 to #76. It’s not like he wrote him off totally & said “This guy sucks” or something
I read the piece and understand the context. There is no other time in a year where a grade will move based on 6 innings.
Fangraphs is a business and prospect articles are hot and get a lot of eyeballs. I understand why they produced this piece, but I simply can’t take the moves that were driven by spring training outcomes seriously.
You’ve forgotten the scouting part of prospect work.
It’s not just 5.2 innings. It’s also across 3 appearances showing poor control. Balls and strikes don’t always correlate with walks and strikeouts, especially in MiLB. If his future ranking is predicated on improved command of one or more of his pitches then Eric may see some serious concerns after watching him 3 times.
Scouts routinely move prospects on a single look. It’s fine if you want to weight stats over scouting, but if you’re going to weight scouting at all then yes, 8 spring training innings can move someone.
Spring doesn’t count for anything, and you’ll hear time and time again that you have no idea what a player is working on, but apparently it impacts the FV outcomes of players? I’d like to see the data on that.
If scouts were judging based on what they saw and viewed, the prospect lists would have much more volatility between them than they do.
I can’t tell if you legitimately don’t understand or not, but the idea is that sometimes you can see things in person (or even on video) that you can’t see otherwise. Eric is probably the most conservative prospect analyst when it comes to moving people around and he is always, always taking into account previous data. If he was moving people around just based on spring training guys like Dana would be a lot lower.
What you say Eric is doing is not what he is doing.
Dan Szymborski talked recently how spring training stats do how some predictive power – while they aren’t as good as regular season stats, they do tell you something – a spring training PA was worth something like 80% of a regular season PA. However they are a lot more important for players who have very limited professional track record. Now that’s ZiPS, not scouting.
You also said there is no other time in a year when a grade will move over 6IP. I don’t think that’s true, if Andrew Painter is topping out at 90mph on his fastback in a minor league start, I’d think his FV is going to drop straight away.
Painter had tommy John and his FV dropped zero. Velocity declines are a sign of arm injury. This was an odd example given that painter actually proved my theory.
I’ve been reading fangraphs forever. They’ve never done this type of prospect series/article.
Also, why don’t you ask Dan how predictive 6 innings are. I’d bet you he’ll tell you basically null.
I want to caveat to say i enjoyed the read and information throughout but I’m very skeptical of a Talent evaluator who moves of such noise.
Except it didn’t, because TJ is nowhere near a career death sentence anymore.
I’m skeptical of a supposedly Rational fan who seemingly has pitched a tent on top of incomplete information.
I wasn’t talking about what Painter had done in spring training, but if he had a random April or May minor league start where he was only throwing 90, instead of 100, that would not be good – and as you said would indict some serious injury, which given he’s just returning from TJ, would be a very bad sign, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he’d be bumped down significantly after that. Certainly we’d question any team who traded from him, treating him as a 60FV.
Unless I’ve misinterpreted what Dan was saying on Effectively Wild recently, I think for some like Hagen, because of such limited professional data, his spring training stats would be fairly meaningful.
I’m curious what would move Jaison Chourio into the FV50 level. Lots of people were surprised he wasn’t on the original list but Eric laid out good reasons for leaving him off. The original list was only 5-6 weeks ago so I’m wondering what’s changed in such a short time period.
One reasonable reading of such changes is that Fangraphs writers in general are open to revisiting their opinions if others make compelling cases or new facts emerge. Something similar happened when Yoshida went from 35 FV to 45+ FV, despite nothing changing except him getting a 5/90 deal. Overall, it seems like a good thing.
In fairness…Eric was right the first time with Yoshida.
60 Hit/40 Power…and a DH who’s a 30 runner.
Then he shouldn’t have changed it, I guess? You kind of can’t have it both ways, you know? And a 40 power seems low for someone with a .148 ISO.
But I would argue that the jury is still out on Yoshida. He’s played through injuries that have hampered him each of the past two years. Even with the actual results, he’s amassed 1.4 fWAR and 2.8 bWAR in 1,001 MLB PA. That’s a lot closer to a 45+ FV player than a 35 FV.
Yeah, he changed it after Yoshida’s hot start in 2023, before his BABIP regressed.
Anyway, I’d call him a (very fun!) 40.
I’m fairly certain the grade went up to at least 45 after he signed but before he played at all.
40 is fair and so is very fun. 🙂
Great stuff. Thanks!
How many HRs does Jacob Wilson need to hit to stop being talked about like he’s a 145lb slap hitter from the 1910s?
5? He has to at least pass Nick Madrigals’ career total.
Let’s start with one at the major league level. Not spring training. The zero barrels and average ev below the speed limit on a rural Texas highway don’t help either
If a guy has literally zero barrels maybe he should try a torpedo? Being serious too…like obviously elite bat to ball skills. Maybe try and just not hit it on the label?
How many has he hit so far?
1! Today. Tbf it was a home run in (1) ballpark in the entire MLB (Sacramento).
Fun facts:
Between 1910 and 1919 only one shortstop hit more than 10 homers in a season.
In 2024, every single qualified shortstop hit more than 10 homers in a season.
I really like the out of the box thinking on Cijntje. My biggest question would be how do you develop him so that he’s major league ready with both arms? My default would be that you’d want to give him a chance, like you would with any other SP prospect, a chance to develop the skills necessary, even if you plan on LHPenning him. But he also necessarily has to be a different guy if he’s going to face opposite-handed batters on a regular basis. Could you ask him to throw every 3 days if he’s only using one arm at a time? Do you have him alternate innings?
Secondarily, I wonder if there are some biomechanical benefits of him switching arms throughout his starts. I saw a lot of pitchers throwing 30-pitch innings this weekend. You have to think that he’s got a better chance at staying healthy if he’s throwing a 20 and 10 pitch inning at the same time instead. How do you value that?
I mean there was that one “amphibious” pitcher a few years ago, but he wasn’t good with either arm. I think there are really quite a few things he could do. His idea is quite good, and interesting.I’m sure there are other options too. Tons of different ways they could approach it, going to be interesting to see, that is for sure.
Colson Montgomery is all out of whack right now. In addition to his previous issues with high fastballs, he has not been making contact in his sweet spot and has not been able to lay off balls down-and-in and below the zone. Has only been able to do anything with middle-middle pitches in the first three AAA games. Similar issues in spring training and the breakout game.
The 50’ing of Luis Mey is legitimately shocking stuff, but as a Reds fan, I have to hope it’s one of Eric’s wisest moves yet!
When I saw his walk rates I thought of Joey Votto… not the association I expected to make
Whew, George Lombard Jr top 30ish prospect?. I’m predicting a breakout season similar to Anthony Volpe in ’21. And I think he’s got much easier power than Volpe. But Volpe is a better defender. After all the talk about the Yankees weak system, they’ve got three top 60ish prospects, and two top 40ish guys.
He’s not a 55, though. That’s usually the grade we associate with players in the 20-35 range.
Love this content! Thanks
In a chat I had asked how Bazzana and Wetherholt could have an overall hit tool lower than each component of Pitch Sel and Bat Control. The answer was it was a mistake, but both still have the same tool assessments now. Curious if the hit tool grade is supposed to go up to 60 for them or if one of the components isn’t as high as the board lists.
Looking like Jed Hoyer got fleeced in two trades with the asencion of Smith, Hope, and Farris???
Jed Hoyer and getting fleeced in trades, name a more iconic duo.
Franklin Arias (Bos)….needs to make this list.
Glad to see my guys Logan Henderson and Jonah Tong getting some love.
Some real question marks with Caden Dana. Gotta be careful with performance of age by level when a team promotes someone that aggressively.
The ETAs here are super conservative. Williams, Kurtz, Eldridge, Dollander, Basallo, Walcott. Lots of these guys are a prety good bet to beat their ETA by a year…
Hi! I think the ETAs are more based on when the player would need to be added to a 40-man roster, with a few tweaks. Here is the excerpt from the A’s top prospects page:
Maybe they are very conservative about the manual adjustments?
The ETAs are the worst part of the board. They’re based on the Rule 5 timeline, except when they aren’t, and sometimes they get updated, except when they don’t. Just throw the whole thing out and put Rule 5 timeline / minor league options in there instead. What’s up there is pretty misleading.
Agreed, the issue is that basing it on rule 5 is almost like a “Max ETA” for top level prospects, especially college bats. These guys beat the rule 5 timeline all the time. For 60 or 70 FV prospects, and I don’t have numbers to back this up I am just spitballing based upon experience, I would bet that “average number of levels of promotion” would be somewhere above 1.5/year”. Calling Rule 5 the “eta” for these guys isn’t particularly accurate.
Maybe it should be something like “doneness” with a scale of few numbers, like “work in progress”, “working on a few things”, “could contribute soon”. I don’t know, I think that seeing an “add to 40-man by t time” easily is useful, but in conjunction with a “doneness” for a bit more context.
Yeah im pretty sure Eric has even said in one of his chats that the ETA are largely just rule 5 combined with his own educated guessing but no one should pay much attention to them
Yeah that is his stock response to this but it’s not a good one. He clearly doesn’t have the time to adjust every ETA manually so it provides almost no information. Just stop it and put a rule 5 timeline on there instead!
If Roki has a “dead zone” fastball even in the 95-97 range it will be hammered. The splitter is incredible and the slider seems alright, this does not seem like a 65 FV guy to me, more in the 55 range. On top of this there are durability concerns. People were seemingly more excited about Roki because of velo/splitter than Yamamoto but the big difference between the 2 is Yamamoto has great command, roki has always struggled with his command.
I wonder when this list was made and how recent the updates were?
Love this stuff as always. Q: “Alex Freeland slides from the “Everyday Middle Infielder” bucket”, yet he is still a 50 middle infielder. Wouldn’t that still be everyday? Unless the clarification is that he is still projected to eventually be a 50 but he is not there yet?
Everyday player is a 45. A 50 is average for their position, i.e. a 2ish WAR player.
When Eric writes: “ I’ve spent a lot of time on the Dodgers’ complex this spring (for reasons you’ll soon read)”
Does he say why in this article? Or is this being saved for another article? I didn’t see it but maybe I missed it.
I imagine he just means the Dodgers list will be out this week.
So it isn’t that he married a nice woman from Glendale?
Wait! Tai Peete is a Mariners prospect with a strikeout problem? How’d that happen?
Sasaki hasn’t shown any signs of command in the US yet. And he’s coming off a full season in which he admitted his arm was hurting. That’s a really risky profile.
Mayer…those of us who spent the spring watching him during spring training..he looked ready for MLB: smooth fielding, great command of the strike zone, and more athletic as he filled into his body…healthy. He had the best spring of any player invited to spring training. His rankings on this and other lists feel outdated and are influenced by his injury-plagued seasons. If Story’s contract and presence weren’t an issue, Mayer would be the starting SS in Boston and might deliver a .270/320, 20 HR, 15 SB season with plus defense. His “make-up” enhances all of the above.
You can like Mayer all you want but disregarding his red flags because of half a season of AA ball and spring training is not the way to look at prospects. His contact rate last year was still below average and he has problems hitting breaking balls, so going skipping over AAA entirely is doing a disservice to him if anything.
Mayer without the durability concerns is easily a 55, but his track record suggests he’s likely to miss a significant chunk of his team controlled seasons and that needs to be accounted for in his prospect grade.
Eric, this design is the best presentation of prospect data that I have seen maybe ever- most digestible and useful for both fantasy players and people who are just looking up their team’s prospects. Thanks for the write-ups!
best here- or other sources!