Baltimore Orioles Top 45 Prospects

© Tommy Gilligan-USA TODAY Sports

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Baltimore Orioles. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as our own observations. This is the second year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers.

A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.

All of the numbered prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.

Orioles Top Prospects
Rk Name Age Highest Level Position ETA FV
1 Adley Rutschman 24.0 AAA C 2022 70
2 Grayson Rodriguez 22.2 AA SP 2023 65
3 D.L. Hall 23.4 AA SP 2022 55
4 Colton Cowser 21.9 A CF 2024 50
5 Gunnar Henderson 20.6 AA 3B 2024 50
6 Coby Mayo 20.2 A RF 2025 50
7 Kyle Bradish 25.4 AAA SP 2022 45+
8 Kyle Stowers 24.1 AAA RF 2022 45
9 Jordan Westburg 23.0 AA 2B 2024 45
10 Heston Kjerstad 23.0 R RF 2024 45
11 Terrin Vavra 24.7 AA 2B 2022 45
12 Leandro Arias 17.0 R SS 2027 40+
13 Connor Norby 21.7 A 2B 2025 40+
14 Cesar Prieto 22.7 R 2B 2024 40+
15 Drew Rom 22.2 AA SP 2023 40+
16 Reed Trimble 21.7 A CF 2025 40+
17 Kyle Brnovich 24.3 AA SP 2023 40
18 Carter Baumler 20.0 R SP 2025 40
19 Darell Hernaiz 20.5 A SS 2025 40
20 Maikol Hernandez 18.3 R SS 2026 40
21 Mishael Deson 19.6 A LF 2025 40
22 Mike Baumann 26.4 MLB SIRP 2022 40
23 Joseph Ortiz 23.6 AA SS 2023 40
24 Anthony Servideo 22.9 A SS 2024 40
25 Donta’ Williams 22.6 A CF 2025 40
26 Hudson Haskin 23.1 A+ CF 2024 40
27 Zach Watson 24.6 AA CF 2022 40
28 Jean Pinto 21.1 A SIRP 2024 40
29 Cadyn Grenier 25.3 AAA SS 2023 40
30 Jahmai Jones 24.5 MLB 2B 2022 40
31 Alexander Wells 25.0 MLB SP 2022 40
32 Brandon Young 23.5 A+ SP 2024 35+
33 John Rhodes 21.5 A 3B 2025 35+
34 Felix Bautista 26.6 AAA SIRP 2022 35+
35 Bryan Baker 27.2 MLB SIRP 2022 35+
36 Logan Gillaspie 24.8 AA MIRP 2022 35+
37 Carlos Tavera 23.3 A MIRP 2025 35+
38 Morgan McSweeney 24.4 AA SIRP 2023 35+
39 Tyler Burch 24.4 AA SIRP 2023 35+
40 Keagan Gillies 24.0 R SIRP 2025 35+
41 Tyler Nevin 24.7 MLB 1B 2022 35+
42 Kevin Smith 24.7 AAA SP 2022 35+
43 Cole Uvila 28.0 AAA SIRP 2023 35+
44 Ignacio Feliz 22.3 A+ SP 2023 35+
45 Isaac Mattson 26.6 MLB SIRP 2022 35+
Reading Options
Detail Level
Data Only
Full
Position Filter
All

70 FV Prospects

Drafted: 1st Round, 2019 from Oregon State (BAL)
Age 24.0 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr S / R FV 70
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/60 60/60 45/55 40/30 60/70 60

Rutschman is a complete, franchise-altering prospect, and one of the most exciting young players in the entire sport. He’s a switch-hitter with a hit/power combination that would probably make him an All-Star anywhere on the diamond, while also being a plus defender at the most demanding position in baseball, and an intense, vocal, charismatic leader. His track record of superlative statistical performance and unanimous scout adoration has continued uninterrupted for nearly half a decade now, and in our eyes, he is in a tier of his own as the best prospect in baseball.

From the fall after his freshman season onward, Rutschman went wire-to-wire as the consensus top prospect in the 2019 draft. He ended up slashing .353/.473/.559 throughout his career at Oregon State, where he also briefly kicked for the football team, and stood apart from the other members of Collegiate Team USA. To nobody’s surprise, he was drafted first overall in 2019 and signed for an $8.1 million bonus. Because of the pandemic, 2021 was Rutschman’s first full pro season. The Orioles sent him straight to Double-A Bowie, where he slashed .271/.392/.508 and earned a promotion to Triple-A Norfolk. Across the entire season, he hit .285/.397/.502, with nearly as many walks as strikeouts and 50 extra-base hits. In the middle of all that he went to the Futures Game, where his batting practice session was among the loudest and most impressive of the elite talents there. He’d switch sides of the plate mid-session and just start sending balls into the Coors Field seats without needing any swings to get comfortable from that side. Rutschman’s swing is absurdly athletic for a guy his size and even though it’s often an effortful cut, he barely ever whiffs, posting a 6.7% swinging strike rate in 2021, among the best in the minors. That mark would rank Rutschman 16th among qualified big leaguers in 2021, slightly better than Jose Altuve and Justin Turner in this particular statistical department.

Rutschman catches from a traditional squat but will sometimes fall to one knee as he’s receiving a pitch to improve its presentation to the umpire. He’s extremely strong and can frame pitches at the bottom of the strike zone without letting his target sag below it first, which lots of other catchers need to do to frame pitches there. His best pop times hover around 1.90 and are right on the bag, though Rutschman’s longer levers and big frame can sometimes mean a few extra tenths to get out of his crouch when he has to reach across his body to catch an errant pitch on steal attempts. His fiery on-field makeup is tailored to the situation. Sometimes, he calmly shepherds pitchers along; sometimes, he’s in full Brian Dawkins mode, lighting a fire under the team and the crowd.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Rutschman is a nearly-perfect prospect and inspired internal discussion about whether he deserved to be our second-ever 80 FV player. We decided against it largely due to the nature of the catcher position, which tends to reduce the number of games played and often comes with (sometimes long) fallow offensive stretches due to the physical toll catching takes. There’s also a little gap between Rutschman’s measured raw power and his visual report, and his barrel rates in 2021 were a little below the big league average. Adley makes a ton of contact but not always on the sweet spot of the ball, leading to what we anticipate will be all-fields doubles spray rather than elite home run totals. Still, he projects as a perennial All-Star and consistent MVP threat, the next decade’s best catcher in baseball.

65 FV Prospects

Drafted: 1st Round, 2018 from Central Heights HS (TX) (BAL)
Age 22.2 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr L / R FV 65
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Cutter Command Sits/Tops
70/70 70/70 70/70 55/60 60/60 40/50 96-98 / 100

The 11th overall pick in 2018 out of a Texas high school, Rodriguez saw his stuff tick up immediately after turning pro. He experienced another jump during his time at the alternate site in 2020 before somehow finding another gear last season, turning in a dominant performance in the minors that saw him post nearly three times as many strikeouts as hits allowed. It’s hard to argue for anyone other than Rodriguez being the best pitching prospect in baseball, and no one can match his pure stuff in terms of both the depth and quality of his arsenal. His fastball now sits 96-98 mph and has scraped triple-digits on multiple occasions, and he’s added a low-90s cutter that has come along quickly and already grades as plus. As good as the velocity and movement on his fastball are, his secondary offerings are even better, as his two power breaking balls have both earned 70 grades from some scouts thanks to the big sweep and bite on his low 80s slider and the hard downward action on a curveball with similar velocity. His low-80s change gives him a fifth plus or better option and features big velocity separation to go along with plenty of fading action. He has a starter’s frame and has cleaned up many of the flaws in his delivery, with an awkward finish that ends with him nearly turned away from hitters the only nit to pick. Those changes keyed a transformation from a pitcher with a control-over-command reputation to one who can better locate all of his pitches in the zone. It sounds almost too good to be true, but there’s very little not to love in terms of Rodriguez’s present ability or future potential. Rodriguez will likely make his big league debut in 2022 and has the potential to be a No. 1 starter and Cy Young candidate.

55 FV Prospects

3. D.L. Hall, SP

Drafted: 1st Round, 2017 from Valdosta HS (GA) (BAL)
Age 23.4 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr L / L FV 55
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 55/60 55/60 30/40 93-96 / 98

Hall paved over Double-A hitters for the first month-and-a-half of the 2021 minor league season — 31 innings, with just 16 hits and 56 strikeouts — before being shut down with elbow tendinitis. It was supposed to be just a few weeks, but Hall had a setback in July and imaging revealed a stress reaction in his elbow; he was done for the year and didn’t throw off a mound again until January of 2022. Ultra-competitive, athletic southpaws with this kind of stuff are very rare. Hall has incredible arm speed and his fastball has flat, bat-missing angle. Only two big league lefty starters threw harder than Hall in 2019 (he averaged 95 mph), and he enjoyed a two-tick velo bump to start last season and was sitting an incredible 97 mph before shutting things down. His slider also became more distinct from his curveball in 2021, averaging about 4 mph more than his curveball. Both breaking balls are death to left-handed hitters, as Hall lines up on the extreme first base side of the rubber and has a cross-bodied delivery that they struggle to pick up, but his breakers’ angle plays to the back foot of righties, too. His changeup doesn’t have huge movement but still garners embarrassing swings from hitters trying to cheat to catch up to his fastball. Because Hall’s arm action is long, his release is inconsistent, and he comes with pretty sizable relief risk, risk that was heightened by the 2021 injury. If he ends up in a bullpen, then we’re talking about an elite reliever, as close as you can get to karmic retribution for the Josh Hader trade. More likely, Hall ends up as an inefficient starter in the Blake Snell mold, though Hall is a better athlete than Snell and has a better shot to hone his command as a result. Regardless of the specifics of his eventual role, Hall is going to be an impact big league arm, and probably very soon.

50 FV Prospects

4. Colton Cowser, CF

Drafted: 1st Round, 2021 from Sam Houston State (BAL)
Age 21.9 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/70 40/45 30/45 55/55 45/55 50

Cowser entered the spring of 2021 as a potential first round pick, but moved toward the top of draft boards with a campaign at Sam Houston State that elevated his stock greatly in the eyes of both scouts and statistical models. Cowser is a well-rounded player, but the big appeal comes from his hit tool, as he offers plus-plus contact skills and the ability to make consistently hard contact against both velocity and spin. Unlike many young, high-contact types, Cowser is also a highly disciplined hitter who is aggressive in the zone, yet rarely swings at pitches out of it. He’s not a huge source of power, but he has enough to be dangerous and projects for 15-20 home runs annually down the road. He’s a plus runner with a solid arm who should be able to stay in center field for at least the remainder of the decade. Cowser’s skill set should allow him to move quickly through the minors. He combines a very high floor with a star ceiling.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2019 from Morgan Academy HS (AL) (BAL)
Age 20.6 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr L / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/50 50/55 40/55 50/40 45/60 60

Henderson was still 19 when the Orioles assigned him to Low-A Delmarva to start the 2021 season. He hit the ground running there, slashing an incredible .313/.391/.613 and moving into our 50 FV tier. Then the strikeouts started to pile up; he K’d in roughly 35% of his plate appearances over the rest of the season. Henderson is best when he can drop the bat head to impact pitches at the bottom of the zone. He’s shown glimpses of flattening his path to hit pitches at the top of the strike zone, though not as consistently, and making adjustments in this area was part of Henderson’s focus at the Orioles fall camp. The further up and away from Henderson a pitch is, the more likely he is to hit it to the opposite field. It’s exciting that he has the power to do damage that way, but his inability to turn on some of these pitches may be an indication he’ll struggle with rise-and-run fastballs of big league velocity. Henderson’s power, ball/strike recognition, and what we project will be plus third base defense still present a skill set befitting an average everyday player, even if he ends up with a 40 bat. Any indication of potential swing-and-miss issues here are new. Henderson raked as a high schooler against both varsity pitching in the southeast and on the showcase circuit, and was seen as among the more advanced 2019 prep hitters, a good bet to move though the minors faster than the other hitters from his draft class (which he has). There’s plenty of time for some of this stuff to get polished up and while it increases Henderson’s perceived variance, our view of his ceiling hasn’t changed. He’s just going to have to walk an unexpected path to get there.

6. Coby Mayo, RF

Drafted: 4th Round, 2020 from Stoneman Douglas HS (FL) (BAL)
Age 20.2 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr R / R FV 50
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 50/70 30/60 50/40 40/45 60

Mayo was the highest-ranked prospect among the overslot players Baltimore drafted with the pool space opened up by Heston Kjerstad’s underslot deal. Bullish as we were on him last year, a .320/.426/.555 line split between the complex and Low-A during his first full season exceeded our expectations. At Mayo’s size, we still think he’s destined for an outfield corner, but he’ll likely add so much strength as he matures that he will have enough power to support an everyday profile there. Mayo made frequent contact as an amateur and it was often hard, but his swing was odd-looking and featured a strange, choppy stride. His stance is more upright now and he’s moved off the plate a little bit, but for the most part his swing has stayed the same and Mayo has performed anyway. Recall the batting line Mayo just posted. This is an “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” situation at the moment, but Mayo’s underlying hit data (just an 8% barrel rate in 2021) indicates there’s still room for improvement in the contact quality department. Mayo has the talent to anchor the middle of a big league order and got out of the blocks more quickly than expected. There aren’t strikeout red flags here, which is rare in conjunction with this kind of power projection and frame.

45+ FV Prospects

Drafted: 4th Round, 2018 from New Mexico State (LAA)
Age 25.4 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr R / R FV 45+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 50/50 55/55 45/50 40/45 93-96 / 97

Bradish had some of the more interesting pitch data in the 2018 draft but questions about his ability to throw strikes dropped him to the fourth round. He kept the ball in the zone more than ever in 2021 while also seeing his velocity tick up, leaving more evaluators than ever convinced he can stay in a starting role. Bradish’s unique delivery, which features a dramatic hip tilt in his load, creates equally unique (and effective) fastball shapes, as his over-the-top release produces nearly perfect backspin on one of the more vertical fastballs around. Once sitting in the low-90s while touching 95 mph, Bradish now parks his fastball in the 94-96 mph range, and while the qualities of the fastball make it quite difficult to locate within the lower half of the strike zone, he uses the upper half to great effect. He complements the fastball with a pair of good breaking balls, with his downer curve giving him a classic vertical attack and a sweeping slider adding a horizontal aspect to his game. Bradish’s firm changeup is on the fringy side, but good enough to be utilized in the right places. Nobody is going to call Bradish precise, and he tends to rack up high pitch counts, but he’s cut down the walks enough to project as a five-and-dive type of starter who just out-stuffs opposing hitters on the right day. He’s lined up for a 2022 big league debut.

45 FV Prospects

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2019 from Stanford (BAL)
Age 24.1 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr L / L FV 45
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/40 55/55 45/55 50/50 50/55 60

Stowers was a steady performer at Stanford, but his showings on Cape Cod are what led to him being a second round pick in 2019. He reached Triple-A in his COVID-delayed 2021 full-season debut, putting up good overall numbers to go along with concerns about the general utility of his hit tool. Stowers’ best assets are his approach and his well above-average power. He makes good swing decisions, which allow him to hang in well against left-handed pitching, and he has the ability to drive the ball out of any park and to any field. He has a tendency to get overly conscious of his power, which leads to over-swinging and an uphill plane, and a big strikeout rate is just something teams will have to live with; it limits his ceiling to a five- or six-hole hitter with a low batting average but plenty of walks and bombs. He’s a solid athlete who runs well and has enough arm for right field, but his future will be defined by what he can do at the plate. Like many in the Baltimore system, Stowers is poised for a 2022 major league debut.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2020 from Mississippi State (BAL)
Age 23.0 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 203 Bat / Thr R / R FV 45
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/50 50/50 30/50 55/55 40/45 45

Westburg improved every year during his three at Mississippi State, and a fantastic showing during the 2019 Cape Cod season helped push him into the end of the first round in ’20, where the Orioles selected him with the 30th overall pick. His COVID-delayed 2021 pro debut began with a blistering start at Low-A Delmarva, and Baltimore moved him aggressively; he finished the year at Double-A Bowie, where he saw his first struggles but rebounded with a flurry at the end of the season. Westburg is a physical infielder with a simple, uncomplicated stroke and above-average raw power. Improved swing decisions were a key developmental focus for him heading into the season, and positive changes were clear from day one. He can get a little stiff with his swing and has trouble covering the entirety of the vertical span of the strike zone, which means he’s likely to always make less contact than desired. But he moves well for his size and can play an acceptable shortstop at a 45-grade clip while providing plus defense at both second and third base. There are no special tools on display, but Westburg should be a decent hitter with decent power while providing decent defense at multiple positions. That all adds up to an everyday player who keeps you well above replacement level while you wait for a star to come along.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2020 from Arkansas (BAL)
Age 23.0 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 215 Bat / Thr S / R FV 45
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/50 55/60 35/60 50/40 30/50 50

Kjerstad is a difficult prospect to line up on a list. The second overall pick in the 2020 draft after putting up a 1.011 OPS during his three years at Arkansas, Kjerstad was diagnosed with myocarditis shortly after signing, and while he turns 23 this week, he’s yet to step into the box in an official pro game. Kjerstad’s calling card is plus or better power for the left side and the ability to drive baseballs to all fields. He’s an aggressive hitter who will need to tighten up his swing decisions as a pro, and some scouts saw him as more of a power-over-hit type who might run into some strikeout issues against pro pitching. He’s a fringy runner with a solid arm who projects as a solid defender in right fielder. All we can really talk about is what Kjerstad looked like nearly two years ago, but by all accounts he’s healthy now and ready to hit the ground running once spring camp kicks off. His long-anticipated pro debut will give everyone, including the Orioles, a much better idea of his future.

11. Terrin Vavra, 2B

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2018 from Minnesota (COL)
Age 24.7 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr L / R FV 45
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 35/35 30/35 55/55 50/50 50

Vavra isn’t very physical and likely won’t have the kind of power necessary to be an impact everyday player, but his swing is super athletic, he tracks pitches deep into the hitting zone, and we think he’ll make enough contact to be a valuable multi-positional role player capable of manning a variety of premium positions. Vavra had a statistical breakout during his junior year at Minnesota — posting a .386/.455/.614 line with 10 homers, and everything way up from his sophomore year — and has walked at an impressive 13% clip in pro ball while hitting a bunch of doubles and swiping nearly 30 bags in just about a full season’s worth of plate appearances. He is adept at picking out pitches he can drive until he has to expand with two strikes, peppering the middle of the diamond with liners. He has 35-grade raw power, but lefty sticks with Vavra’s feel for contact who can also play up the middle (both middle infield spots and, starting in 2021, center field) tend to be luxury utility types.

40+ FV Prospects

12. Leandro Arias, SS

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2022 from Dominican Republic (BAL)
Age 17.0 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr S / R FV 40+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/60 20/45 20/40 55/60 45/60 55

Arias has a slighter build than some of the other players who ranked very highly among our 2022 international prospects, but otherwise he has a complete skill set and very favorable general profile. He’s a slick-fielding defensive shortstop with advanced feel for contact from both sides of the plate. Arias could have a huge breakout if he ever starts to fill out and add power.

13. Connor Norby, 2B

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2021 from East Carolina (BAL)
Age 21.7 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 187 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 40/45 30/45 50/50 40/50 40

Norby had some of the best numbers in college baseball last spring, hitting .415/.484/.659 at East Carolina while finishing the year with an impressive performance against much better competition in the postseason. Ultimately going in the second round to the Orioles, he put up a .413 OBP in 26 games at Low-A Delmarva and is already seen as one of the better pure hitters in the system. Norby doesn’t wow anyone with his tools, but he makes up for it once you watch him play. He has an outstanding approach at the plate and exceptional hand-eye coordination that generates oodles of contact with enough sneaky pop to get to double-digit home runs annually. He’s not much of a runner and he’s a fringy defender at second base, but he should be able to stay there as an offense-oriented infielder as he develops. Norby really has to hit due to his defensive inflexibility, but every indication so far is that he’s going to.

14. Cesar Prieto, 2B

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2022 from Cuba (BAL)
Age 22.7 Height 5′ 8″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr L / R FV 40+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/60 40/40 30/40 50/50 30/45 40

While playing pro ball in Cuba, Prieto broke Kendrys Morales‘ rookie hits record, then broke the Serie Nacional’s hit streak record (40 games) in 2020 while striking out just six times in 250 plate appearances. His swing and game resemble Eric Sogard’s, as Prieto is super compact and sprays lots of contact to all fields but doesn’t have a lot of power. He signed with Baltimore in January and projects as a quick-moving infield role-player, though if he ends up with a plus-plus hit tool, he could just play every day.

15. Drew Rom, SP

Drafted: 4th Round, 2018 from Highlands HS (KY) (BAL)
Age 22.2 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 170 Bat / Thr L / L FV 40+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Splitter Command Sits/Tops
40/50 50/55 45/55 45/55 88-92 / 93

It looks like the velocity is starting to arrive for Rom, the missing link to a profile that already includes bat-missing fastball shape, natural breaking ball feel, and advanced command. In logged pitch data from 2019 and ’20 instructs, Rom was averaging just 89 mph and sitting anywhere from 86-92. In 2021, he averaged 91 mph. If he grows into even average velocity, the heater’s other traits and Rom’s command will season the pitch enough to make it play like a 55- or 60-grade fastball. It has a well above-average spin rate for its velocity, nearly perfect backspin, and a flat angle that makes it tough for hitters to get on top of, and Rom’s arm action is quick and tough to time. An equally important part of Rom’s success to this point — he’s notched a career 2.89 ERA and 1.12 WHIP in 54 outings since 2018 — has been his breaking ball command. He can vary shape and locate to his glove side, and Rom has a crude split/change with late dive that has a shot to miss bats since arm actions like this tend to eventually yield deceptive changeups. Tracking like a fifth starter throughout his first four seasons in pro ball, the arrow is officially pointing up on Rom’s arm strength. He has a shot to break out in 2022.

16. Reed Trimble, CF

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2021 from Southern Mississippi (BAL)
Age 21.7 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 180 Bat / Thr S / R FV 40+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 50/55 35/50 60/60 45/60 55

Trimble hit .345/.414/.638 during his pre-draft spring and the Southern Miss schedule was no cakewalk even though they’re a mid-major: it included 12 games against eventual regional host and top-16 team Louisiana Tech, as well as games against Mississippi State, Alabama, Florida State and Ole Miss, and four against South Alabama, who made a deep regional run. Trimble does have an expansive approach and is apt to chase, but he is ultra toolsy for a smaller-framed prospect. A switch-hitter, he is an explosive rotator from both sides of the plate. He has pull-side power as a righty hitter but will take you deep to any field from the left side. Both of his swings have natural loft, but they’re not all that long because Trimble is so compact. He’s also a plus runner with gap-to-gap range in center field and an above-average arm (he can get a little carried away trying to throw guys out), so there’s room for him to profile even if the approach hurts his offensive production. Also remember that Trimble missed most of his true freshman season because of the pandemic, reducing his amateur sample size, and he walked a ton during his post-draft pro debut. He’s a toolsy stick of dynamite with more variance than is typical for a college prospect.

40 FV Prospects

17. Kyle Brnovich, SP

Drafted: 8th Round, 2019 from Elon (LAA)
Age 24.3 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
40/40 55/60 45/50 55/60 88-92 / 94

Brnovich fills the zone, his fastball has enough action that it isn’t easy to square up, and he has a legit out pitch in his unique, double-knuckle curveball, a traditional-looking curveball that Brnovich puts both his fore and middle fingers’ first knuckle on. The pitch snaps out of Brnovich’s hand with nearly perfect end-over-end tumble and is a real weapon despite it’s incredibly low spin rate. He’s a high-probability back-of-the-rotation guy who will eat a ton of innings because he works so efficiently.

18. Carter Baumler, SP

Drafted: 5th Round, 2020 from Dowling Catholic HS (IA) (BAL)
Age 20.0 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/50 50/55 45/55 30/50 30/45 90-92 / 94

Coming from an Iowa high school, Baumler was already a bit raw when the Orioles gave him a $1.5 million bonus as a fifth round pick in 2020 and he’s yet to pitch in a game as a pro due to Tommy John surgery. In high school, Baumler featured an effective vertical attack with a low-to-mid-90s fastball with rising action and a deep, upper-70s curveball that showcased some natural ability to spin a baseball. His changeup was rarely seen, but he showed some ability to deaden the ball. He was a two-sport star in high school and is a fantastic athlete with a repeatable delivery who tends to keep the ball in the strike zone. Still just 20 years old, Baumler has plenty of reps to make up but plenty of time to do so. He’s healthy and will be ready for minor league camp in March.

19. Darell Hernaiz, SS

Drafted: 5th Round, 2019 from Americas HS (TX) (BAL)
Age 20.5 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 185 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/50 45/55 30/45 50/45 40/50 55

While his numbers during his full-season debut are merely decent, Hernaiz’s 2021 campaign excited the Orioles, as he entered professional baseball as a raw talent and was one of the youngest players in the Low-A East, taking only eight plate appearances against pitchers younger than he was. Hernaiz has plenty of tools and great makeup, which should help those tools actualize. He’s a plus runner with graceful defensive actions, and while he’s been primarily a shortstop so far, some wonder if he’ll need to slide left or right as his frame fills out, as he’s already much more physical than he was in high school. There’s plenty of bat speed on display here, but Hernaiz fails to really drive balls or stay through on his swing, and more than 80% of his hits in 2021 were singles. He’s a player with plenty of upside, but there’s still a good bit of time and distance between what he is now and what he could be.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2021 from Venezuela (BAL)
Age 18.3 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 175 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
20/45 30/50 20/50 50/40 40/45 60

Hernandez was one of the top players from the Baltimore international class that signed in January of 2021, part of a reinvigorated international operation that lay dormant under the previous regime. While his pro debut failed to impress in terms of performance, scouting the stat line in the DSL is a dangerous undertaking and Hernandez’s numbers and underlying data improved throughout the season. Hernandez provides a rare combination of size and athleticism that fits the casting call for a modern, star-level shortstop. He has an eye-popping frame, but there are some concerns as to just how big he will be at physical maturity and if that will lead to him needing to change positions. For now, he’s more than toolsy enough to stay up the middle, with graceful actions, fundamentals beyond his years and a plus arm. Offensively, Hernandez has plus bat speed and power potential as he grows into his frame, but he’s prone to over-swinging at times and has too much pre-swing movement to give him the mechanical consistency he’ll need as he moves through the system. Hernandez has a massive ceiling, but we are still years away from knowing what his chances of reaching it are.

21. Mishael Deson, LF

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2018 from Dominican Republic (COL)
Age 19.6 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 185 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
25/60 40/55 20/50 45/30 30/50 45

An ultra-projectable teenage outfielder acquired as the Player to be Named Later from Colorado in the Mychal Givens deal, Deson has good feel for contact for someone his age and size, and he has lots of room on his frame for more weight and strength. Deson was pushed to full-season ball at the end of the 2021 season after slashing .369/.416/.515 on the complex. His swing decisions and feel for lift lag behind, but Deson won’t turn 20 until the middle of the 2022 summer, so that’s fine right now. He’s not particularly explosive and obviously looks destined for an outfield corner now that he’s started to fill out a little bit. There will need to be a hit/power combination here for Deson to profile but the most important aspect of that combination seems to be present, and Deson’s frame makes him very likely to end up with more power as he matures.

22. Mike Baumann, SIRP

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2017 from Jacksonville (BAL)
Age 26.4 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/60 70/70 45/45 40/45 40/40 92-95 / 97

Baumann’s 2020 ended with a flexor strain but all of his velocity was back in ’21, when he was once again sitting in the 93-95 mph range. The length of Baumann’s arm action and his delivery’s violence give him a relief look, but he developed four distinct pitches and threw enough strikes in 2019 to convince a large swath of the industry he could start. While Baumann throws pretty hard and has a nasty slider, he doesn’t really generate any in-zone whiffs, and barely any whiffs at all with his changeup and curveball. That pushes him comfortably into the bullpen for us, though a velo spike out of the ‘pen could mean high-leverage relief.

Drafted: 4th Round, 2019 from New Mexico State (BAL)
Age 23.6 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 175 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
40/45 40/40 30/35 55/55 55/60 55

Ortiz put up some silly offensive numbers as an amateur, including a .422/.474/.697 line as a college junior. But that performance took place at New Mexico State, a school that produces silly numbers across the board due to the offensive environment, which is the best in college baseball. The Orioles selected Ortiz in the fourth round based just as much on his defensive prowess, and he’s lived up to expectations so far as a pro. Ortiz is a plus defender anywhere in the dirt who makes up for a lack of twitch with outstanding instincts, strong fundamentals and a plus arm. He has a decent approach and a feel for contact, but he rarely impacts the baseball, which limits his offensive upside. Despite hitting from the right side, he struggles against left-handed pitching and tends to be much more effective against fastballs as opposed to off-speed pitches. The Orioles have given him plenty of time at second and third base as a pro, which is further indication that they agree with the external projections of Ortiz as a solid utility player.

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2020 from Ole Miss (BAL)
Age 22.9 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 175 Bat / Thr L / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/40 45/50 35/45 55/55 45/55 55

Servideo was a model darling coming out of the University of Mississippi because of his phenomenal on-base skills, and scouts liked him as a legitimate defender in the dirt who could really run. His first 20 pro games produced a bizarro batting line of .246/.489/.312 at Low-A Delmarva before his season was cut short by surgery to repair a sports hernia. Servideo had a walk rate over 20% over his last two college seasons, and that spiked to more than 30% during his brief pro debut. Obviously, he has plate discipline to spare, but he also seems to stand passively in the box looking for a walk at times. Those scenarios lead to pitcher’s counts, and there are questions about what Servideo can do when forced to swing a bat, as his bat-to-ball skills are a bit questionable and his power is well below average. He can provide good defense at both second base and shortstop and will likely play both positions if he gets to the big leagues, where he future is that of a pesky utility player who works the count.

Drafted: 4th Round, 2021 from Arizona (BAL)
Age 22.6 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 185 Bat / Thr L / L FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding
35/55 40/40 30/35 60/60 55/60

Williams was draft-eligible in 2020 and had a good (short) pre-pandemic run, but he went unselected. He repeated his performance in 2021, walking more than he struck out while playing a solid center field and hitting for doubles power at hitter-friendly Hi Corbett Field. Williams has a simple cut and peppers the middle of the field with liners. He runs well enough to stay in center field long-term, but he has below-average power. He profiles as a traditional fourth outfielder, which might be a modern fifth outfielder.

26. Hudson Haskin, CF

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2020 from Tulane (BAL)
Age 23.1 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
35/55 50/50 30/40 60/60 45/55 60

Haskin had an incredible freshman year at Tulane, but his COVID-shortened season got off to a slow start, at least in the power department. Teams wrote that off as a small-sample quirk and he still landed in the second round of the 2020 draft. His in-game power has still not returned as a pro and most feel that his funky swing is what’s preventing that from happening. Haskin is a big, athletic center fielder with a major league frame. He runs well and plays a solid center, and he should be able to stay up the middle well into his prime. His approach at the plate is good enough, but his swing generates far more line drives than loft and has some holes both up and down in the zone, leading to elevated strikeout rates. Haskin has been good, but he still frustrates evaluators because it seems like he should be better. He has a fourth outfielder floor but there is some wild variability from there.

27. Zach Watson, CF

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2019 from LSU (BAL)
Age 24.6 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 166 Bat / Thr S / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/30 60/60 30/40 70/70 60/70 60

Watson has the kinds of tools that would be the envy of many a Top 100 prospect despite a smallish frame, but a miserable approach and ugly swing continue to be his undoing. Watson’s plus raw power and 70-grade speed give him 30/30 potential, as evidenced by his 21 home runs and 24 stolen bases in just 105 minor league games in 2021. He covers tremendous ground in center field, but his arm, while not a liability, is a bit on the fringy side. At the plate, Watson swings at far too many pitches, while his multi-part, disconnected stroke creates additional swing-and-miss issues. He’s an extreme chaser who rarely sees good counts, and his weaknesses will likely be exploited even further by advanced pitchers who are more comfortable attacking out of the zone. Watson’s tools alone make him a slam dunk fourth outfielder, but without some kind of dramatic, unexpected change in his swing decisions, that’s also going to be his ceiling.

28. Jean Pinto, SIRP

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2017 from Venezuela (LAA)
Age 21.1 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
50/60 60/60 40/45 30/50 90-94 / 96

As we compile our lists, we ask our sources to tell us who they think we missed during the prior year’s version of the exercise. During this cycle, Pinto was mentioned by every single source. Pinto is one of six players on this list who Baltimore acquired from the Angels via trade, in this case for José Iglesias. He posted an 86-to-17 strikeout-to-walk ratio in 66 innings last year, but most scouts think he’s a reliever despite the sterling numbers. Pinto is short and stocky and already doesn’t have much room on his frame at age 21. He sits 90-94 mph with natural cut and carry, enabling him to attack the zone with imprecision and get away with it. Pinto’s low-80s slider has plus, two-plane action right now, while his changeup could use more velo separation from his fastball at 85-88. His frame and longer, catapult-like arm action are relief indicators, too. Pinto has a middle relief floor, with a shot at a more impactful role if his velo ticks up in shorter stints.

Drafted: 1st Round, 2018 from Oregon State (BAL)
Age 25.3 Height 5′ 10″ Weight 188 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/35 50/50 35/45 70/70 50/55 60

The stout and strong Grenier is a good defensive shortstop with some raw pop and elevated peripherals. His overt physical tools — the power, straight-line speed, arm, and defensive ability — have been well-reviewed since he was in high school, and forced Nick Madrigal to move from shortstop to second base during the last year and a half of Grenier’s time with Oregon State. His odd swing hampers his ability to make contact, but because of his feel for the zone and power, Grenier’s overall offensive performance has been just shy of league average, which is pretty good for such a sound middle infield defender. He’s in a crowded field of role-playing prospects and was left off Baltimore’s 40-man, so consider Grenier upper-level depth for now, but gloves like his tend to find their way onto a big league bench.

Drafted: 2nd Round, 2015 from Wesleyan HS (GA) (LAA)
Age 24.5 Height 5′ 11″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr R / R FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
45/45 50/50 40/40 60/60 35/35 45

Jones has been lauded for his tools since he was selected in the second round of the 2015 draft and while he began to tap into his raw power in 2021, his game still hasn’t really come together and his brief big league stint inspired more questions than answers about his future. Jones has always enticed with his combination of plus speed and strength. He’s an eye-catching athlete, but it hasn’t all translated into baseball ability. He can impact a baseball, but some length in his swing creates contact issues and big league pitchers were able to blow him away with good velocity. For the most part, his power surge has come against left-handed pitching, while righties can still tie him up on the inner half. He’s been shuttled between second base and the outfield as a pro and while he’s capable of flashy plays in the dirt, he also boots too many routine plays and lacks the quality jumps needed to be effective in center field. The upside is here for a permanent big league role, but it’s looking more and more like an up-and-down career is in the cards for Jones.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2015 from Australia (BAL)
Age 25.0 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr L / L FV 40
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
30/30 45/45 50/50 40/45 55/70 86-89 / 91

How good does a pitcher’s secondary stuff and command need to be to succeed in today’s game with an upper-80s fastball? We may be about to find out. Baltimore’s rebuild should give Wells an opportunity to perform six innings’ worth of surgery every fifth day. His fastball only sits 87-89 mph but it has plus-plus vertical movement and Wells locates it up and to his glove side with remarkable consistency. His most-used secondary pitch is a cartoonish, low-70s curveball, which wreaks havoc on hitters’ timing and balance, often making them look like basketball players trying not to commit a lane violation. His slider is more typical-looking (in the 78-80 mph area), while Wells’ changeup is entirely reliant on his command. All of these pitches live in areas where they’re either tough to hit or not hittable at all, allowing for fifth starter projection despite below-average stuff.

35+ FV Prospects

32. Brandon Young, SP

Undrafted Free Agent, 2020 (BAL)
Age 23.5 Height 6′ 6″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/45 45/50 55/55 50/55 30/50 91-94 / 95

An undrafted senior (he spent two years at Howard JC, then two at University of Louisiana-Lafayette) from 2020, Young had a great debut season split between Low- and High-A, striking out a third of the hitters he faced while working about four innings per start. Young mixes in a changeup, curveball, and slider very evenly around his fastball, which sits 93 mph. His curveball has nearly elite spin, but Young actually deployed his mid-80s changeup a little more frequently than Uncle Charlie last year, and his bevy of offerings makes him unpredictable. His stuff quality will be stress-tested at the upper levels, but Young looks like a potential backend starter, which would be a great outcome for an undrafted free agent.

33. John Rhodes, 3B

Drafted: 3rd Round, 2021 from Kentucky (BAL)
Age 21.5 Height 6′ 0″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
30/35 50/55 30/45 50/50 30/40 55

Originally set to be eligible in 2022, Rhodes became eligible for the 2021 draft when the selection date moved due to COVID. Remember, sophomores are eligible to be picked if they turn 21 within 45 days of the draft, and Rhodes was one of a few prospects with an August birthday who benefitted from the shift. He entered the year as a young-for-the-class infielder coming off a strong shortened 2020 season. Rhodes’ swing is grooved and he swung and missed in the zone a lot in 2021, but he still reached base at a .400 clip and slugged a shade over .500 thanks to bat speed rather than lift in the swing. This is an athletic young player with experience at several different positions. Rhodes caught in high school but moved off the position due to a broken back. He played both infield corners and all three outfield positions at Kentucky but was exclusively 1B/LF/RF during his first pro summer. He could be a power-centric, multi-positional player but there’s risk the hit tool bottoms out the profile here, and if Rhodes is limited to first base and the outfield corners, it’s going to be tough for him to profile as anything more than a 40. Still, he’s a young, athletic prospect with two years of good statistical performance in the SEC backing up the visual evaluation of his power, so he’s a developmental prospect to watch.

34. Felix Bautista, SIRP

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2012 from Dominican Republic (MIA)
Age 26.6 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Splitter Command Sits/Tops
70/70 45/45 30/35 93-98 / 100

Bautista has elite arm strength (sitting 97-99 mph and touching 101) and a power curveball in the 82-85 mph range, which has good depth for a pitch at that velocity. He also has very little idea of where they are going, which has been the case for Bautista’s entire career. So wild was Bautista that, after his second season with Miami back in 2014, he was released after walking nearly two batters per inning that year. He spent a combined four years in the DSL between Miami and Baltimore, which makes his 2021-22 offseason add to Baltimore’s 40-man roster an incredible achievement for both Bautista and the Orioles’ dev group. Notes from 2019 on Bautista have him utilizing a splitter, so the curveball is fairly new here. This is a huge big league fastball, enough to pitch in a lower-leverage, up/down relief role due to the inconsistency of Bautista’s control.

35. Bryan Baker, SIRP

Drafted: 11th Round, 2016 from North Florida (COL)
Age 27.2 Height 6′ 6″ Weight 245 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 40/40 45/50 30/30 96-97 / 99

Baker was drafted by the Rockies and traded to Toronto as the PTBNL in the Seunghwan Oh 오승환 deal. He reached Triple-A with the Blue Jays in 2019 and was back there for all of ’21, where his walk rate was dialed down into a more palatable range. He made his big league debut in early September with Toronto. He was eventually squeezed off the Jays roster, though, and was claimed off waivers by Baltimore in November 2021. Baker throws really hard, sitting 96-97 mph and touching 99, which is up two ticks from 2019 when he was only sitting 94. His secondary stuff is solid: a mid-80s changeup garners most of the whiffs while Baker’s slider relies on its low-90s velocity. If the strike-throwing improvements hold, then Baker will grab hold of a middle relief job rather than spending the next couple of years going back and forth between Baltimore and Norfolk.

Independent Ball, 2018 (MIL)
Age 24.8 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 220 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
60/60 45/50 45/45 40/45 40/40 94-97 / 98

Gillaspie is a converted high school catcher who spent a little bit of time at a JUCO, then quickly began to cut his teeth in indy ball at age 20. His arm strength grew as he gained exposure to more cogent training programs and he went from sitting in the upper-80s to touching the mid-90s during United Shore League All-Star Game in 2018. The Brewers, who are among the best teams at plucking prospects out of indy ball, signed Gillaspie on the strength of that look; he pitched in Milwaukee’s system for a couple of years before being released after 2019. He rehabbed a knee issue during the early part of the pandemic and caught on with Baltimore in the middle of 2021, signed in June, and was thrown right into the fire at High-A, where Gillaspie thrived and was quickly promoted to (and missed bats at) Double-A Bowie. He then came to the Arizona Fall League, where he was seen by the whole industry. In a league thin on pitching, he stood out. Gillaspie would often sit 94-97 mph and touch 98 during his fall outings, and he’d bend in a bevy of fringe secondary pitches. The depth of his repertoire is probably enough to keep hitters at bay in a long relief role. He’s a great story and now that he’s on Baltimore’s 40-man, he’s likely to debut as a bulk middle-inning reliever in 2022.

37. Carlos Tavera, MIRP

Drafted: 5th Round, 2021 from UT Arlington (BAL)
Age 23.3 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 195 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
45/50 45/45 60/60 35/50 90-94 / 95

He was walk-prone in a small post-draft sample but Tavera threw strikes in college and is likely to be developed as a starter in pro ball, at least for a while. Synergy Sports has his average fastball velocity at 91 mph from prior to the draft, but summer pitch data had him averaging 94. Tavera’s fastball has big carry, too, but his money pitch is a dastardly changeup with trapdoor action. His sliders are okay when they’re located. The velo bump came in a small sample after Tavera had a couple months away from pitching, and he was working in shorter outings. It’s not certain that it will hold, but he stands a chance to race up this list if it does. If not, then the deceptive elements of Tavera’s fastball are better suited for working once through a lineup.

38. Morgan McSweeney, SIRP

Drafted: 17th Round, 2019 from Wake Forest (BAL)
Age 24.4 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 210 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Command Sits/Tops
55/55 60/60 30/40 94-96 / 97

Another good prospect out of Wake Forest, McSweeney reached Double-A in 2021, his first full season, and struck out a batter per inning, often while working two frames at a time. He enjoyed a velo spike in 2021 and went from maxing out around 95 mph in ’19 to sitting 95 last season. He also has a plus slider with big vertical depth and near elite spin rates. Because it’s just two pitches, McSweeney projects in a single-inning relief role. If he can remedy some strike-throwing consistency issues, he could just be a 40 FV middle reliever, but for now he looks like an up/down type.

39. Tyler Burch, SIRP

Undrafted Free Agent, 2019 (PHI)
Age 24.4 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 190 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Command Sits/Tops
55/55 60/60 30/40 93-96 / 97

An undrafted free agent signed by the Phillies in 2019 out of NAIA powerhouse Lewis and Clark State, Burch has missed plenty of bats and thrown plenty of strikes so far as a professional; he was acquired by Baltimore at the 2021 trade deadline for Freddy Galvis. Burch has the stuff out of the bullpen to support his impressive numbers. His fastball isn’t overwhelming, but it sits at a solid 93-95 mph with the kind of hopping action that the Orioles covet. He pounds the zone early with his fastball, using it to get ahead in the count so he can break out a plus low-to-mid-80s slider with impressive two-plane break. Burch has shown a tendency to not elevate his fastball enough, leading to some home run problems, but he’s ready to return to Double-A to start the year, and while a 2022 major league debut is unlikely, isn’t out of the question. His ceiling is likely that of a good middle reliever.

40. Keagan Gillies, SIRP

Drafted: 15th Round, 2021 from Tulane (BAL)
Age 24.0 Height 6′ 8″ Weight 255 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/60 40/45 45/50 30/30 30/40 92-96 / 98

Gillies was a fifth year senior sign who had a big velo boost after he transformed his body later in his college career. He’s built like a construction crane at a lanky 6-foot-8 and went from topping out at around 92 mph to pumping some 98s, and the pitch has big carry. At least one of Gillies’ two seldom-used breaking balls will need to develop (per Synergy Sports, he threw 73% fastballs in 2021) for him to even be a big league reliever, but his curveball has promising vertical shape. He’ll also need to hold his velo all year, since it fell off closer to the draft and Baltimore only allowed him to throw one inning in affiliated ball before Gillies was part of their fall camp. He’s a late-blooming sleeper relief prospect.

41. Tyler Nevin, 1B

Drafted: 1st Round, 2015 from Poway HS (CA) (COL)
Age 24.7 Height 6′ 4″ Weight 225 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game Power Run Fielding Throw
50/55 50/50 40/40 30/30 40/40 50

The 2021 season was a pivotal one for Nevin, his first in the Orioles org after he was traded from Colorado as part of the Mychal Givens deal in ’20. Nevin’s terrific feel to hit led to lots of aesthetically-pleasing doubles contact while he was a Rockie, but the game power it generated was insufficient as Nevin trended down the defensive spectrum into the 1B/LF area due to arm strength and accuracy issues. A fresh start with Baltimore increased the possibility of a shift in Nevin’s approach and while his swing doesn’t have overt differences compared to the 2019 version, his batted ball output was more air-oriented in ’21 than ever before. He set a career-high in homers (16) with Norfolk, but all the fly balls helped tank his BABIP and he slashed .227/.305/.392 as a 24-year-old. Nevin’s feel to hit is still good, his swing is balanced and deft, he makes contact all over the zone and he’s especially adept at opening his hips and ambushing pitches on the middle third. He lacks the power typical of a player fit for a part-time corner role but he hits enough to project into a low-end version of that role for a while, and he’s a candidate for eventual transition to a foreign pro league.

42. Kevin Smith, SP

Drafted: 7th Round, 2018 from Georgia (NYM)
Age 24.7 Height 6′ 5″ Weight 200 Bat / Thr R / L FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Changeup Command Sits/Tops
40/40 55/55 45/50 45/50 87-90 / 92

Smith is a low-slot lefty with a long-arcing, low-80s slider, a beautiful pitch with gigantic sweeping action. His command of that pitch is great and those elements alone make him a lefty-extinguishing bullpen option, at least. He doesn’t throw very hard, only about 90-92 mph, mixing in four- and two-seamers. Righties get a long look at that fastball and Smith’s changeup isn’t quite good enough to keep them off it. LOOGYs don’t really exist anymore, and that’s what Smith presents as at a glance, especially after a command/control regression in 2021. His repertoire depth puts him in the sixth-to-eighth starter mix (teams tend to need those, too) or perhaps in a bulk middle-inning role.

43. Cole Uvila, SIRP

Drafted: 40th Round, 2018 from Georgia Gwinnett College (TEX)
Age 28.0 Height 6′ 3″ Weight 206 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/55 50/50 55/55 30/40 93-95 / 97

A 40th round pick of the Rangers who came to Baltimore via the minor league Rule 5 draft, Uvila’s spin rates were down a couple hundred rpm in 2021 compared to ’19, when he looked like a three-pitch relief prospect. His velo, however, is up. He may now have to lean more heavily on his screwball-style changeup; the deceptive elements of his delivery will help. He’s in an up/down relief bucket now rather than squarely in a big league bullpen.

Signed: July 2nd Period, 2016 from Dominican Republic (CLE)
Age 22.3 Height 6′ 1″ Weight 180 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
40/45 50/55 40/50 40/50 86-90 / 92

The 22-year-old converted shortstop had a little bit of a velo bump in 2021, going from sitting 87-92 mph in 2019 to sitting more 91-93. While small-framed, Feliz is a plus on-mound athlete and his pitches have good shape and action, especially his curveball. There’s a possibility for long-term pitch development here because Feliz is so athletic, still fairly new to pitching, and now on his third org (he went from Cleveland to San Diego in a 40-man crunch deal, then to Baltimore in the minor league Rule 5), but he is admittedly a long-shot prospect for whom we have a soft spot.

45. Isaac Mattson, SIRP

Drafted: 19th Round, 2017 from Pittsburgh (LAA)
Age 26.6 Height 6′ 2″ Weight 205 Bat / Thr R / R FV 35+
Tool Grades (Present/Future)
Fastball Slider Curveball Changeup Command Sits/Tops
55/55 40/40 45/50 40/40 45/45 92-94 / 96

Ones of the many pitchers who came back from the Angels for Dylan Bundy, Mattson pitched very well early in the year at Triple-A Norfolk before struggling in a small big league sample during his debut. He was shut down for most of the second half with a shoulder injury but returned to Triple-A in late September with velo in his usual 91-95 mph range. Mattson seemed to add a second breaking ball in 2021, as he’d show you an upper-70s curve with vertical shape and a mid-80s slider with lateral shape. While breaking ball dev is something to monitor, Mattson’s fastball’s riding life is the carrying trait here and has him set to be an up/down contributor in 2022.

Other Prospects of Note

Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.

Upper-Level Pitching Depth
Zach Peek, RHP
Garrett Stallings, RHP
Zac Lowther, LHP
Adam Stauffer, RHP
Rickey Ramirez, RHP
Nolan Hoffman, RHP

Peek and Stallings are the final acquisitions from the Angels who you’ll read about on this list. Peek has two breaking balls that spin at 3,000 rpm and he throws a ton of strikes, but the visual evaluations of his stuff are more vanilla and he has starter No. 7-10 projection. So does Stallings, who sits about 90 mph and has five pitches. Lowther is a former FanGraphs fave due to his delivery’s deceptive elements but they haven’t stood up to upper-level bats and he now a depth evaluation, too. Stauffer, a former high school selection out of Coatesville, PA, has put up great numbers in a long relief role but nobody — neither eyeball scouts, nor data folks — can figure out how he’s doing it. The 23-year-old doesn’t have an especially weird delivery or anything, but he has a career 3.27 ERA and great strikeout-to-walk ratios for the last couple of years. Ramirez, 25, and Hoffman, 24, are both former minor league Rule 5 picks, with Hoffman going first overall this offseason. Ramirez, picked from Minnesota, has a bevy of pitches, some of which have plus-plus spin, and he sits 94. He was old for A-ball in 2021. Hoffman is a side-armer whose fastball has huge tailing action, and he throws strikes with it. He has a bullpen shot.

Young International Players to Watch
Braylin Tavera, OF
Anderson De Los Santos, 3B
Moises Ramirez, 3B
Isaac De Leon, SS

Tavera got $1.7 million a few weeks ago and is a well-rounded corner outfield prospect with medium projection. De Los Santos and Ramirez are both somewhat mature teenage third base prospects who performed in the DSL and FCL, respectively. De Leon didn’t perform with the bat in 2021 but scouts still like his glove and body projection.

Catching Depth
Samuel Basallo, C
Creed Willems, C
Connor Pavolony, C
Maverick Handley, C

Basallo was the youngest prospect on Baltimore’s DSL team and hit for power down there. He has a low-ball swing with above-average bat speed but is physically maxed out already at 17. Willems is a stout over-slot high school draftee with power and risk of moving to first base. Pavolony and Handley were college draftees who had good careers at huge schools. Handley (Stanford) is the better catch-and-throw athlete, while Pavolony (Tennessee) has some power and a great frame.

Developmental Arms
Raul Rangel, RHP
Alejandro Mendez, RHP
Dylan Heid, RHP
Justin Armbruester, RHP
Deivy Cruz, LHP
Juan De Los Santos, RHP

There was support for Rangel as high as the 40 FV tier. He’s a projectable teenage righty with a delivery that drew mixed reviews. He throws strikes, though, and already sits 90-93 mph at age 19, which pairs with a changeup that flashes plus and a workable slider. Mendez, 20, is pure arm strength, sitting 96 and touching 100. Heid was the O’s 11th rounder out of tiny Pittsburgh-Johnstown. He sits in the low-90s with backspin/carry elements, can turn over a changeup quite well, and has a fringe slider. Armbruester is a deceptive righty out of New Mexico, garnering in-zone whiffs despite sitting 90-92. He and Heid are potential arrow-up types with pro dev tools at their disposal. Cruz is a super loose, athletic 17-year-old lefty who carved the DSL sitting 86-87 with a shapely slider. He’s a deep athletic projection guy at this point. De Los Santos, 19, pitched on the complex sitting 89-94 with cut, a mid-80s slider, and a change that flashes average.

Water-Carrying Raw Power
J.D. Mundy, DH
Andrew Daschbach, 1B
TT Bowens, 1B
Cristopher Cespedes, RF
Isaac Bellony, 1B

This entire group is at or near the bottom of the defensive spectrum and has a power-over-hit offensive profile. Mundy, 23, spent some time at Virginia Tech before transferring to Radford, where he was a senior sign. He’s a husky lefty power bat with big early-career performance in a sample that’s a little small in part due to a long IL stint. Daschbach hit for power at Stanford and had 16 homers in 2021, but struck out 35% of the time as a 24-year-old in A-ball. Bowens, 23, was a senior sign out of Central Connecticut State, the second alum of that school in FanGraphs prospect list history (J.P. Sportman of the A’s was the other), who also performed consistently in college and now in A-ball. Cespedes, 23, had some of the bigger exit velos in the 2019 minors while in Cleveland’s system, and was a Baltimore minor league Rule 5 pick. He’s still hitting for power despite a poor approach. Bellony, a 20-year-old switch hitter from the island of St. Thomas, is the most projectable of this group but also the farthest away.

System Overview

Nobody promised that the turnaround would be quick when Mike Elias became the general manager of the Baltimore Orioles prior to the 2019 season. Instead of focusing on the quality of the major league roster, Elias and company put all of their efforts into generating a productive player pipeline. They built one of the better analytics groups in the game, overhauled their player development system, brought modernity to their draft process, and built an international operation from scratch, including a new complex in the Dominican Republic that is scheduled to open in 2023.

Nonetheless, three years in, a composite winning percentage of .341 at the big league level has created some restlessness among Orioles fans, who want to see results and understandably so; the club hasn’t made the playoffs since 2016 and has finished in the American League East’s basement eight times in the last 15 seasons. 2022 represents the year when the first returns from all that recent work should start to manifest on the field in Baltimore. Nobody is saying the Orioles are going to win the division this year; nobody is saying they’ll compete for a playoff spot or even have a winning record. But what we should expect is a team that finally has some exciting young players on the major league roster, players who can provide optimism for the future of the franchise, and as something more than trade chips.

Outside of Adley Rutschman and Grayson Rodriguez, this isn’t an especially star-studded system, but it’s certainly a deep one and it’s hard to criticize any collection of minor leaguers that features both the best overall prospect in the game as well as the best pitcher, both of whom should see Camden Yards this year. But that’s been Elias’ game since he ran the draft with the Astros: find as many big leaguers as possible, even if they don’t have overly-high upside at the time, and let some of them surprise you by exceeding expectations. That’s not to say that the current regime is overly conservative when it comes to player acquisition. While the Orioles are still college-centric drafters, of the 11 seven-figure-or-higher bonuses the team has given out over the last three years, four have gone to prep talents, and the club hasn’t shied away from spending equally large sums in the even riskier international market. There are certainly some safety plays here, but the team isn’t afraid to diversify either.

The Orioles finished 48 games out of first place in the division in 2021, but perhaps even more jarring is the fact that they were 39 games out of fourth place. It just goes to show that even with the optimism this system is likely to inspire in long-suffering fans in 2022, the road to actually mattering in the standings remains a long and arduous one.





139 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
CookiePuss
4 years ago

No Adam Hall? Figured he’d be at least be in the 40 FV tier

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  CookiePuss

No Adam Hall. We researched him (and many others) and he didn’t make the cut.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

“Outside of the #1 prospect in the game who we thought about giving an 80 and a definite Top-5 prospect who is undoubtedly the best pitching prospect in the game, this system is not particularly star studded” brings new depth to the glass-is-half-empty rhetoric.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Although to be fair, I’m about 75% certain that DL Hall is a reliever. Everyone wants to dream on a guy like him being Blake Snell or Robbie Ray. But if you’re going to be walking batters more than 10% of the time as a starter, you are probably going to be more valuable in the bullpen. It’s kind of like guys who strikeout more than a third of the time…when you don’t have control over the zone, the whole rest of your game is teetering precariously on the edge. So guys like Snell and Ray have generally been best when their walk rates are hovering around 9% (or less), which doesn’t seem like a big difference but it really is. What’s a grade for a guy who has an actual shot of being Josh Hader, but also could very possibly be another Tanner Scott or Paul Fry?

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I would argue Blake Snell should probably be a reliever

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think it speaks to how far away they are behind the other teams, no? Would the best position/pitching prospects make up 40 games in the standings? After that it’s a bunch of 50’s, who may or may not break out. At least a lot of these guys are going to debut in 2022, so maybe that hastens their progress and they get some Mullens-like breakouts.

They also haven’t really done much at all internationally, which they’re finally changing. But that will take years to have an impact. I don’t envy this organizations road, even when compared to my Bucs. Here’s hoping to a 2026 WS of Bucs-O’s.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

I don’t know, a 55 and three 50s beyond that…it’s pretty good from a “possible star” perspective. Here’s the list of players graded at 50 and up by team so far:
SFG: 6
PIT: 6
BAL: 6
NYY: 5
CHC: 5
DET: 4
ARI: 4
MIL: 2
TOR: 2
PHI: 2
OAK: 1
COL: 1

I think we can quibble with a couple of the guys on this list (Hall, Henderson), but also with some of them on the Giants (Bart, Bailey, Ramos), Yankees (Medina, maybe even Vargas), Cubs (Alcantra, Caissie), and Pirates (Gonzales). And even if we drop Hall to a 50 he’d still be up there. Plus I think they might be a bit conservative on Cowser (I’ve changed my mind on him). And going up to 55 as the cutoff means they’re the only team profiled so far with 3 55s or higher.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

They may view those 50’s though as solid type of contributors here rather than stars, and among the 50’s, Mayo seems like the one who may be more star like. Colton Cowser and Kevin Alcantara are both 50’s but I’d say they have a much wider variance, don’t you think? Also, maybe they’re less impressed with the 45+ and below and their likelihood of turning into stars as well. I dunno, they’re still the highest rated system so far. And even with that, it ain’t gonna make up 40-50 games in the standings.

shortstoppin_Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Reid Detmers erasure smh

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  shortstoppin_

lol whoops

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Still, there are worse places to start a rebuild than with the best overall and best pitching prospect in the game. They also have a front office in place that can be trusted that they know what they’re doing.

I’m not an Orioles fan, so no bias here, but I think this site has been far too critical of them. In terms of “worst” situations I wouldn’t even have them in the bottom 5

SenorGato
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sign of the times….it’s never not enough

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
4 years ago

This has to be the most glowing 1-2 prospect duo review that Fangraphs has ever written, right? Awesome read.

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

I was wondering the same thing myself . . .

vslykeMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

The Rays had the #1 (Wander Franco) & #3 prospect (Randy Arozarena) in all of baseball last year and Franco was an 80. IMO, an 80/60 beats a 70/65.

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  vslyke

Good point.

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  vslyke

I was thinking more of top pitcher and top position player…..

vslykeMember since 2020
4 years ago

Rays just missed that last year (Patino was 2nd to Pearson). In 2018, Ohtani was the top prospect, so maybe that’s the real answer. 🙂

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

eric’s write-up of Chicago’s return in the Chris Sale trade was not dissimilar– moncada was at the time the #1 prospect in baseball, if maybe not quite as strong of one as like Wander, and Kopech was known as the guy that threw 105 lol

booondMember since 2019
4 years ago

Didn’t the Orioles run this path with Wieters? What’s different this time?

grandequeso
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

They are two different people?

The Stranger
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

I haven’t seen an Adley Rutschman Facts website yet.

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

The fact that they are different players? I think it’s weird to assume that every good Orioles catching prospect isn’t going to work out because Matt Weiters didn’t live up to expectations.

booondMember since 2019
4 years ago

Can’t it be a serious question as to the differences of one super catching prospect versus another super catching prospect? Why did one not live up to the hype and what in the new shiny toy makes him shinier?

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

I guess I don’t know what Matt Weiters has to do with it. Does one have to answer this question for every top prospect? How is this guy not [insert failed prospect] here? They are prospects. By default they have great variability.

booondMember since 2019
4 years ago

This is a comparison between like prospects. You do that all day long. What makes one different than the other? If you don’t know or don’t care then say that.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

Why does it have to be Wieters though? Adley’s game is much closer to a Buster Posey type anyways, he’s a better defender and has better discipline than Wieters, without the same power projection.

SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

Wieters plate discipline in the minors was really good as well.

In fact, Wieters and Adley’s numbers as a 23 year old at AAA are eerily similar. With that said, two different players, and if Wieters had stayed healthy, and continued to play like he did as a 25 and a 26 year old, he’d be on the backside of a HoF career.

grandequeso
4 years ago

Weiters had a little more power but also hit way more ground balls. He also struck out more relative to league average (which was under 20% then and is now closer to 30%).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

Because a catcher with a 60 hit tool, 55 game power, 70 field, and a 60 arm is a 5-win player? It’s worth noting that Wieters actually had a couple of seasons that were a bit like that, but he broke down early, like many catchers do. This is also referenced in the report above, where they said that the worry about him breaking down was why they didn’t give him an 80.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

While Wieters may feel like a disappointment, the dude made four AS games and had 15-20 WAR. Maybe it’s the hype and not the player who is the problem. I blame the internet.

SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Catching is hard. Wieters put up some really high WAR numbers at 25 and 26, then started missing time with injuries… There’s a reason Bryce Harper plays RF.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

Bold prediction time: Adley Rutschman will fall somewhere in between Matt Wieters and Buster Posey when his career is all over.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He’s gonna make O’s fans forget about Chris Hoiles. Side note: Hoiles was really good.

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

For that matter, how is Rutschman different from Bryce Harper or Brian McCann?

SenorGato
4 years ago
Reply to  booond

If this is an audition to be a NY Jets fans, you’re in. There’s few things more relevant than the upsetting past when it comes to these pesky youths making money to play a game!

mattMember since 2023
4 years ago

Imo ver generous 55 FV given to DL Hall given big strike issues and very generous 50 FV’s given out too

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  matt

I would grade Cowser and Norby a bit better and Hall, Henderson, and Stowers a bit worse. I think Cowser has Brandon Nimmo-type offensive potential and if he is average-to-plus in CF I think he’s got a floor of a 2.5 win player. But I think we also need to see more of Henderson, and I agree on Hall.

HowBoutDemOsMember since 2019
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Stowers over Westburg an eyebrow raiser for me too, though I know Eric has long been high on Stowers. Would have expected Westburg as a 50 or 45+.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  HowBoutDemOs

I’ve been a little skeptical of Westburg for a while–he profiles a bit like Dylan Moore to me. Some upside there but I think they got him right. I think when Eric looks at Stowers he sees someone who has a chance of being Joc Pederson or Brett Phillips if everything breaks right, but I’m very skeptical of that. He doesn’t field like Phillips and he doesn’t hit like Pederson. He’s probably more like a guy who hits like Phillips and fields like Pederson…kind of like Derek Fisher in overall value, with a ceiling of Seth Brown.

mattMember since 2023
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think cowser’s floor is far below that. The 70 hit is very generous, i think he’s more of a 60 hit/45 power guy that’s stretched in center.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  matt

If he’s a below average guy in CF, a la Nimmo, then yeah, you can probably drop both his ceiling and his floor by about a win. I don’t think he’s going to have a wRC+ less than 90, though, so I don’t think his floor drops below a win. So I’d put his floor at 2 wins (not 2.5, I did the math right this time!) if he’s a slightly above average CF.

mattMember since 2023
4 years ago

Bal: 375
Pitt: 326
CHC: 271.5
AZ: 255.5
SF: 248.5
Det: 221
NYY: 214
Tor: 155.5
Phi: 141
Mil: 137
Colorado: 112
Oakland: 105
LAA: 79

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  matt

I am pretty sure the only competition for the top farm system in baseball is going to be the Mariners. The Rays, Marlins, Pirates, and Royals have good systems but it is really hard to top a system that has the best position player prospect and the best pitching prospect in baseball.

mattMember since 2023
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

By fg probably true. Imo baltimore has the most overrated farm in baseball and lacks much impact outside the top 2. Pitt/TB/Sea all easily better and others I’d take over Baltimore too. Tho fg is privy to more info than me obviously

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  matt

I think Seattle is probably the top one. Then Baltimore, then Pittsburgh, although they’re close. I’m not sure where TB, MIA, and KC would fit in that group, but probably below Pittsburgh. Aside from Baz I doubt TB has anyone better than a 50 unless we’re high on Brujan.

The Ancient Mariner
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Is everyone forgetting the Dodgers?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Good depth in the system, no obvious headliners. Andy Pages will be if he keeps the K’s down in AA, though. Bobby Miller looks very good and is probably the second best prospect in the system. Michael Busch and Miguel Vargas might hit enough. Diego Cartaya is high risk, high reward. A couple guys who could be multi-inning buzzsaw types? Also, they have a guy named “Outman” but he hits so that’s not ideal. Overall the system is good and might potentially fit in after Seattle, Baltimore, and Pittsburgh with TB / MIA / KC / ARI / CLE.

OlanMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m worried about Outman…

Kevbot034
4 years ago
Reply to  matt

Look forward to this post as much as I do the prospect right ups, thank you so much Matt.

I get more shocked every time how bad that Angels MiLB is, yikes.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

Wait until you see the White Sox list. They might not even have a prospect at FV45 or above.

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

jose rodriguez is probably gonna be a 45+, maybe a 50, he raked at a/a+ at age 19/20 this year showing newfound pop and will prolly stick in the MIF. other than that uhhh… norge vera spent his tax-saving summer in the Dominican blowing away 17 year olds with newfound triple digits?

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

My Nationals are probably worse than LAA.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Nah, Ruiz still has prospect eligibility, and Cavalli and House are potential 50s. Gets pretty bleak after those three, though.

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago

a shocking amount of ink has been spilled on adley rutschman’s personality (i am a big fan of FG doing this, btw). The effect is that i’m equally excited to see that part of his game as I am all the other parts. has anyone ever received this “clubhouse leader” type hype as a prospect? its kinda silly but also i kinda get it.

i read some interview with him and it just seems like hes a regular nice kid, which i guess is a bit unusual for the hyper-focused travel team circuit of kids with vicariously-living helicopter parents

Dmjn53
4 years ago

I’ve heard his clubhouse leadership is Hosmer-esque. I don’t like comparing players to generational talents like Mike Trout’s hit tool, Jacob deGrom’s fastball, or Eric Hosmer’s clubhouse presence, but Rutchmann is just that special

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

How much morale above replacement is Hosmer and is it something we’ll look back (kind of like framing) to realize Hosmer’s SDP contract was a steal?

KvnMember since 2026
4 years ago

It’s encouraging to see some int’l guys finally show up here. It’s also a bit striking how almost all of the 40/45 FV tier SPs that were on the last two lists have fallen off or not performed after graduating. It will take time to see whether that’s bad luck or a development/acquisition failure, but the lack of SP depth on this list stands out to me.

digiderek
4 years ago

Interesting that Mayo is already being projected to play RF. Is this in part due to seeing Henderson at 3B long term?

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  digiderek

Nah. He’s 6-5/215 and getting bigger. It all screams a future in a corner.

ryannicholasparker
4 years ago

wish we could post images in the comments so I could post the Vince McMahon reaction meme as the 70 grade pitches keep coming in the Grayson Rodriguez writeup

PiotrMember since 2020
4 years ago

A small suggestion but have you ever considered putting the System Overview section at the top? It would serve as a great introduction/context for the list and honestly I sometimes forget to scroll all the way down to read it. (People who focus on the top 20 or so prospects and may not get there either.) Anyways, very appreciative of all your work!

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  Piotr

Duly noted. It’s a valid point, and frankly, I’m not sure if I like it better at the top or the bottom. I think it’s always a good exercise to think about how we do prospect lists and how we would do them differently as opposed to just going in every year and saying this is how we do them.

Hyperart ThomassonMember since 2020
4 years ago

I’d been thinking along these lines as well and wondered if there couldn’t be a link to jump down to the system overview if one wanted to read it first.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Piotr

I would also like the system overview at the top. I always scroll down to the bottom and read it first anyway.

DLHughey
4 years ago
Reply to  Piotr

Couldn’t agree more. It doesn’t really make sense as a short conclusion after a ton of detailed paragraphs. It would function way better an an introduction/abstract type of bit.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Piotr

See I kind of like it at the end, but I also don’t seem to care about this nearly as much as the people who want it at the front. I’ll love it either way.

markakis21
4 years ago

Orioles fan here with some thoughts:

Hall – I’m fine with a 55 because if he hits, he’s going to be a serious star, and he might make it in the pen, but I think most of us have given up on him staying healthy and being a serious contributor. I would have gone 50.

Cowser – Probably should be a 55.

Mayo – Good to see an outlet notice him! This is why you go underslot. If something unexpected happens to your top guy, you have some lower guys.

Arias – I haven’t seen any outlet this high on him, he only signed for 600k. Interesting for sure.

Prieto – He might end up a 45 by the end of the year.

Grenier – LOL seeing him here.

Lowther – Was decent near the end. Additionally seemed to have poor batted ball luck. He’s no less a 40 than Baumann.

Creed Willems – You may regret this one…

JacobM
4 years ago

Thanks for the list! Very excited for prospects week, which should be coming soon.

CC AFCMember since 2016
4 years ago

Cowser’s write up, at least regarding the offense, gives off extremely Markakis vibes. Perhaps Markakis’ ghost is to forever haunt the outfield at Camden Yards due to leaving the game with unfinished business (3000 hits).

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

The most exciting thing about Cowser is that he has the Markakis profile while being able to stick in center. Interesting that FG was the only platform that was high on him going into the draft, largely because they were the only ones that thought he could be a center fielder. Now after a couple of months, pretty much every other outlet loves Cowser and agrees he’s a center fielder. Very strange.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

I would argue that you could peg Cowser’s offensive profile entirely within Nick Markakis’s career, with production corresponding to his 2008 at the high end and 2017 at the low end. If those defensive grades are for real, that puts his floor somewhere around 2 wins and his ceiling somewhere around 6 wins. That is a really, really good prospect.

I was thinking before the draft that his ceiling was like Brandon Nimmo, a tweener outfielder with huge on-base percentages and not so much power. But if he can play a credible center field, his ceiling is better than that, and it raises his floor considerably too.

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Brandon Nimmo is a borderline star. Hurt all the time but has averaged 4.3 WAR per 162. That’s a pretty high ceiling

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

To be fair, there are a lot of outcomes where he hits worse than Nimmo and very very few where he hits better. But if he can play average or better defense in CF, he might not need to hit quite as well as Nimmo to have a similar impact. It’s just so rare to find a guy with this kind of a hit tool, so his offensive floor is surprisingly high.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

So this is a good system, but we should probably talk about the elephant in the room: Who is going to lock down the rotation for the next 5-10 years? Barring injuries or the yips, which could take down any of these guys…
-Means (for a couple of years, assuming he stays)
-Rodriguez (barring injury or the yips, he’s a lock)
-Rom (probably a starter of some kind, has a small shot to be a 3-win guy)
-Brnovich (50/50 on whether 40 fastball is enough, if so he’s probably a back-end guy)
-Young, Smith, and Peek (could become Brnovich if things break right, who himself is a guy who needs things to break right)
-Lowther, Akin, Kremer (got hammered hard in 2021, if you’re lucky one of them might be a starter. If you’re lucky)
-Wells (probably can’t pitch with a 30 fastball long-term and gets DFA’d when he’s out of options)
-Bradish (probably a reliever or piggyback guy)
-Hall (probably a reliever or piggyback guy)
-Baumler (coming off TJ, hasn’t pitched in pro ball yet)
-Zimmermann (future DFA fodder)

So barring injuries or the yips, that’s three guys who are likely starters, one guy who is 50/50, six guys who are somewhere between 10/90 and 25/75, and five guys who you can’t count on. If my math is right, this looks like a system that will only provide 5 obvious MLB starters if everyone miraculously stays healthy and doesn’t get the yips. That is not good. Not good at all.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mean, the Cubs filled out 4 of their 5 starters through FA and/or trades when they won the WS. Every team has to buy some players, even the Rays buy free agents.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

To be fair, unless they extend Means this is very likely what the Orioles are going to have to do too, making this scenario a bit less like an outlier and more like what we would expect to happen. It’s an expensive way to do things.

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

nats 2019 WS win – stras was the only starter from nats system. as for relievers, wander suero and tanner rainey ate innings in low leverage moments. they were the only other homegrown nats that pitched that postseason

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

An expensive way to do things!

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

But the point is that it is feasible. If the Orioles have a rotation with Rodriguez, Means, and Bradish/Hall, as well as likely one of the 40 guys “breaking out” to become a passable starter, that’s not too bad, and much better than the Nats had. Would just need one more above average starter plus a Rich Hill type.

And consider just how strong this lineup is:

OF Mullins (MVP candidate last year, likely 3-6 WAR player)
1B Mountcastle (worth 2.5-3.5 WAR this year after his initial early slump as he adjusted to the bigs).
C Rustchman (Generational player)
RF Hays (3 WAR guy)
OF Cowser (High floor guy, probably a lite version of Michael Brantley, but with a better glove.)
IF Urias (1-3 WAR guy)

Plus maybe Santander, Westburg, Kjerstad become something. Henderson would be on the way shortly thereafter. Plus if they pick a college player #1 they’d be arriving quick.

That’s a very good lineup without even needing to add many pieces! One more top player through trade or FA would make that a very, very good lineup.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

Is it feasible? It is if everyone else is pre-arb, or you’re better at evaluating pitchers than everyone else, or you’re willing to spend wildly. I don’t know.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Presumably they’ll be able to supplement in free agency once they’re more competitive. I can’t think of many good ML rotations built entirely from the team’s farm.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Yes, but usually you get more than a couple of guys too! Of the teams profiled so far, almost all of the systems that you could call “good” have more plausible starters than this. To find teams that have fewer plausible starters than this looking at both guys with lots of team control in MLB and who is coming up…I don’t think it exists.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yes, but how many of those systems have this sheer quantity of Offense prospects (that could maybe be flipped for a pitcher)?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

We’ll see in a few years what it looks like (when presumably they’d go looking to trade) but teams don’t like to trade pitching, especially controllable pitching. You can do this with a thought experiment of what it would take to acquire John Means in a trade–what set of players in the Orioles’ system would be roughly equal to the value of Means right now?

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If they have 5 plausible candidates to start, that qualifies as more than a couple. And I strongly disagree that they have fewer than any other system. Looking at the Pirates, while they have Contreras/ Priester, the next guys they have on the list are Chandler (just drafted) and Jones (did well at A ball but…it’s A ball). The Pirates certainly don’t have anyone like Gant on their MLB roster and neither of their pitching prospects (though good) aren’t as good as the O’s top two.
You’re looking at a 5-10 year plan? With pitchers?! There’s no amount of pitching prospects you can throw at that problem and just cite internal sources. And it’s certainly not worth fretting over in that way.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

They won’t have 5 plausible candidates to start. That’s only if none of them get the yips or hurt. For comparison purposes, if we were to do the same thing for the Pirates, we’re looking at something like this:
Brubaker (Means bucket)
Thompson, Contreras, Priester (Rom bucket)
Yajure, Jones, Chandler, Solometo, Keller, Kranick, Bryse Wilson (10-25 / 75-90 bucket)
Chen, Malone, Cruz, Yean, Crowe, Tejada, Garcia, plus some more I probably missed (don’t count on us bucket)

You’re probably looking at getting 6 or 7 guys out of that group before injuries and the yips. No one is likely to be as good as Rodriguez, but I think you can assume that they’ll get 3 or 4 starters out of this group at some point, whereas with the Orioles I would guess they’re going to get 2.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I keep saying Gant and somehow confusing him with Means.

To act like it’s preordained that one of those guys will be viable starters is folly and premature. Pitchers change drastically, and some of the 45s (who the poster below noted you ignored) could break out.

Also, Brubaker does not equal Means in the sense that JT is barely a five and Means has compiled about 6x as much WAR as him.

Upthread, you’re talking about the writers’ glass half-empty views of the system. Kinda the same thing here.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

How many teams have a completely homegrown rotation? You can’t go full organic there. They’ll supplement with trades or free agents.

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

ATL has Fried, Anderson, Soroka, Ynoa, Toussaint, Davidson, Wright.

And Morton of course. But close.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I find it odd you immediately discount the 45+ guy but consider Rom and Brnovich possibilities.

And why not Baumler? Do guys never come back from TJ?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

No, but a guy who has never pitched in the pros and is recovering from TJ is about as high risk as you can get.

I don’t see how Hall or Bradish are going to throw enough strikes to give you more than 2-3 innings at a time. They could be awesome, but probably not as starters.

KvnMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mentioned it further up, but I don’t think criticizing the pitching depth in the system is unfair. Elias seems to have gone with an approach of bulk acquiring 40FV tier pitching prospects via trade and trying to pitching dev them into 50s while spending almost all of his draft capital on bats. Rodriguez and Hall are easily the best arms in the system and they were drafted by the prior front office. The rest of the potential starters (many of whom to be fair were not acquired by Elias) that have cropped up on the 2020 and 2021 lists look less likely to pan out now vs. when those were published and since they haven’t been taking pitching in the draft there’s not really a back bench of lower minors prospects that are likely to fill those gaps.

I think saying that Baltimore will just pay their way out of this if none of the depth arms pan out is easier said than done since there’s no recent history of this club being able or willing to pay the price necessary to coax good pitchers to come to Camden Yards, even when they were running payrolls north of $150MM and actively trying to win.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Kvn

Right, I mean, Kevin wrote a whole article about this! “Amid Another Awful Season, Do the Orioles Have a Path Forward?” Anyone who is saying that this a-ok is really not thinking about this straight. You lose half your pitching prospects to injuries, a lot of other ones don’t develop, and their current roster has exactly one guy who is a functional major league starter. This is a bad situation.

You can buy your way out of bad situations if you don’t mind giving multiple guys AAVs of $15M-$25M a year for a very long time, but if they have to pay a premium for it or they need to spend elsewhere it’s not looking like a viable strategy.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

But they still have the 2nd best farm system despite there not being a ton of pitching talent. This speaks to the overall talent level they have, regardless of which side of the ball it’s on. And if pitching prospects are so hard to have work out, wouldn’t you prefer a ton of good hitters?

I just don’t understand the criticism at all. The Orioles have the 2nd best farm, why does it matter whether they are pitchers or hitters? FG already takes this into account when assigning values.

Their strong hitting prospects will mean they can afford to cheap out on the lineup and spend on pitching.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

It’s hard to criticize when the overall system is this good. But the system is also seriously unbalanced, and I don’t think it’s that simple to trade prospects for pitchers later or sign pitchers in free agency. It takes an FV50 to land a competent pitcher with a couple of years of team control (Kyle Gibson) and about 4 years, $50M to sign one in free agency (Jon Gray, Steven Matz). That’s just if you want competence for a couple of years; getting someone better (or who is likely to be better for longer) the cost goes up. Even if they extend Means now, it’s gonna cost a lot.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If you’re going to be unbalanced, this is the way to go. In 2019, on this here website, the Braves had FIVE pitching prospects who were rated as a 50 or higher: Anderson, Soroka, Touki, Gohara, and Wilson. Of those five, only Anderson really was a contributor to this season. And three more 45s or higher of who only Muller was a contributor. So my lesson from this is, absolutely do not depend solely on internal prospects to be the backbone of your contender. Would you say the Braves didn’t have enough top end pitching prospects? Or that there is never enough?

It’s not that simple to trade prospects for pitchers? The Bucs traded Joe Musgrove and JT for prospects in the same offseason. So yeah, it has been done and fairly recently. If they’re getting to a point of contention, why can’t they do that in 2-3 years?

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Where were Ynoa and Fried?

With ATL they also hit the bullseye on Acuna and Albies.

I didn’t like the strategy at the time, hitting prospects seem more like sure things. I’d rather trade for a bunch of 1 WAR pre arb pitchers you think will be healthy that a repertoire tweak will bump to 2.5 or something and then also sign like a Morton type.

But it worked for ATL. If anything it’s how remarkably efficient their position player development has worked out.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago

It’s that point in time when all those guys were 50 plus. Fried they traded for and didn’t have him at that time.

Christopher GoreMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think that spending draft capital on pitching prospects is a poor investment. As pointed out upthread, Elias has acquired some pitching prospects via trade (some that look good, Bradish, Brnovich, Pinto), some not so much (Kevin Smith). But I do wonder if Elias isn’t planning on trying to sign a bunch of low investment pitchers in hopes a few pop. And by low investment, I mean post 5th round, 100K international signings.

KvnMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

I mean obviously you need to care about what side of the ball they play on because the Orioles cant play all seven or whatever utility IFs they have in their system at the same time.

I don’t think it’s crazy to not want to base your competitive strategy entirely on how plausible it is that you’ll find willing trade partners for hitting prospects or be able to sign what looks like at minimum three actually good SPs. You can argue that they can do it and it’s not implausible, but I wouldn’t want to be on the side of the bet that needs the Orioles to commit > $200MM long term to SPs in free agency.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  Kvn

But the thing is that most lineups are not fielded entirely from the farm system either. There’s 13 position player slots on a team. The Orioles will ideally be able to fill more of those than a team that has more pitchers. So instead of needing to sign Avasail Garcia, they can sign Steven Matz.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

Given that position playing prospects break down much less frequently, the system won’t go sideways due to injury. An farm system that was heavily reliant on pitching prospects would run that risk. What’s the answer here? That there are never enough pitching prospects? No kidding, that’s why you’ll go external for lots of it.

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I see all the comments on this & the down votes & my first question is: What are the Orioles trying to build? A winning team or the top farm system ranking? There’s a difference. Taking the prospect rankings & adding up the values & saying “all is good” is different than having it apply to the field due to the positional overlap & pitching scarcity.

Maybe it works out for them, but, I am questioning it.

Let’s compare them to another rebuilding team in Detroit, who has:

Spencer Turnbull in the Means role.
Mize, Skubal, Manning already up with 5-6 years of team control left.
Jobe as a 50 (& one that could be a 60-65 once he debuts)
Olson, Wentz, Madden as 45
Brieske as a 40+
5 guys in the 40 tier- Faedo, Richan, Rodriguez, Smith, Hernandez.

That is 14 guys, 9 of them above the last tier of long shots. Baltimore has 8 guys at 40 or above, 5 of them in the 40+ tier , 3 in the 40 tier of longshots & the 3rd highest ranked pitcher (Hall at 55) has strike throwing issues. If he makes it, they’ll likely be fine because they’ll only need to fill in the 4/5 spots, but, if he doesn’t, they’re gonna have issues. They have ZERO room for attrition.

BTW, this is not to say Detroit is great or better..they have their own issues, esp with bats, but, it’s a lot easier to get hitting in trades/FA market than pitching.

grandequeso
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Is it really easier to get hitters though? Maybe outfielders or DH/1B types. Most teams need to add the 1-2 WAR types to fill out their roster. The Orioles just happen to need them on the pitching side and lots of those guys are available every year (e.g. basically the whole Giants rotation or the recent Twins)

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Or rather than building a top farm system, they’re realizing that stockpiling arms doesn’t get you very far because that market is so volatile. Look at the example you gave with Detroit. Mize, Manning, and Skubal combined for less than three WAR in nearly 400 innings. And all of them were 60’s I believe. I know the pandemic may have thrown all the pitchers off kilter, but that wasn’t exactly an auspicious start for those arms.
While I certainly agree that the pitching is light here, that can certainly change with another draft and a breakout or two.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

There’s a really big misconception about what the volatile nature of pitching prospects means, and I’m seeing it all over these comments. Individual pitchers are more volatile and risky because they fail. But if TINSTAAP is true–if there is no such thing as a pitching prospect–it doesn’t mean you should avoid them. It means you should get more of them! If you don’t have starting pitchers, you’re dead. So you need to have a huge number of them in the pipeline just to get a few (or an absolutely massive amount of money, a la the Nationals and Cubs title winning teams).

In general, I’m against drafting pitchers early unless they really are obviously the best player available (so Mize and Jobe, I wouldn’t do that) and in favor of drafting massive numbers of them after Round 1. If the main concern with pitchers is attrition rather than development, then spending single high-value picks on pitchers is not a good idea but spending many mid-tier value picks on them is. Sure, you can miss on Max Scherzer, Gerrit Cole, or Aaron Nola with that strategy, but you won’t miss on Corbin Burnes, Jacob deGrom, or Shane Bieber. Perhaps more importantly, you probably won’t lack for depth. Having multiple Austin Gombers is important if you want to win.

So, how are the Orioles doing with drafting pitchers? The Orioles have drafted a whopping two (!!!) pitchers in the first 5 rounds. This is way less than nearly any team in major league baseball. Even if you only look at the teams Eric has profiled so far, and only look at guys who Eric thinks are going to be starters, the Yankees, Cubs, Rockies, D-Backs, Tigers, Angels, Phillies, Pirates, Giants and Blue Jays all have more than 2 guys who they themselves selected in the top 5 rounds. The D-Backs have selected something like 8 who Eric grades as starters. Eight! The Orioles are a major outlier.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t think it’s a misconception as much as people don’t agree with your take. Which is cool! That’s why we’re all here for to have heated and fun takes on baseball. As far as getting “more” of them, when is it enough? Because as I laid out with the Braves situation above, just because you have a bunch of 50 arms doesn’t mean it’s gonna shake out that way at the MLB level. Because the arms have such a high attrition rate, should you focus only on volume of arms? I’m not sure that’s a solution.

Just because the Orioles haven’t drafted many pitchers in the first five rounds doesn’t mean they won’t in the future. Don’t you think it’s likely they didn’t like the pitchers there as much as the position players in those drafts? Are you suggesting a better frame of thinking is “well we really liked this prep OF with the third round, and our 2-4 choices are position players, but let’s pass on all four because we don’t have enough pitching.” Or maybe the likeliest scenario is this: all or nearly all of their early pitching targets were selected.

In short, I think it’s far too early to see whether this is either part of a plan (targeting position players almost exclusively) or simply something that happened with how the draft went the last two years. And because it’s so early, its too soon to say it’s “not good at all.” We’ll have a good laugh at this at the 2026 World Series between Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

I don’t know what they’re thinking. But if their board consistently lines up so that all of the pitchers with good value are gone, that seems like they might be undervaluing pitching prospects as a group.

I would like to think that opposition to the idea that the Orioles need more pitchers is a misconception. Technically, the answer to “how many pitchers is enough” is “you can never get enough” but in a specific case the issues are:
1) How many pitchers do you currently have under contract at the major league level, will they still be there in the future, and how long will they be pitching at a 5th starter level or higher?
2) How many of the pitchers you have in the minors project as starters?
3) What is the likelihood that these guys will make it to the majors and pitch at a 5th starter level or better, barring injury?
4) What is the overall attrition rate for pitchers based on injury, the yips, off the field problems, or other catastrophic outcomes? (my understanding is that this is pretty high–like, 50% based on how often pitchers are getting hurt now)

You can do this with as many teams as you want; most will fall short. Teams normally can’t supply an entire rotation without signing or trading for established veterans, although some teams are going to be able to (the Marlins will, maybe the Brewers). And most teams will be able to get you three starters out of that group.

But unless you’re willing to run right up to the luxury tax like the Cubs and Nats and Mets did (and what the Mets are doing now), signing more than a couple starters that you can trust in a rotation is not really an option. A starter on the open market that’s a nice, solid, Jon Gray or Steven Matz type is roughly as expensive as the biggest deal the Orioles has ever given to a pitcher. And that’s assuming that teams will even be able to get their targets, but the Orioles aren’t going to have a choice unless literally nobody gets hurt.

hothands
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree – and I think a lot of the examples brought up have involved starting rotations but have not included the bullpen as well. At this rate, not only would the Orioles have to construct an entire rotation, but an entire bullpen outside of the draft. However, the 2016 Cubs only drafted one pitcher on their playoff roster. I think what the Orioles may be trying to do is to build a competent major league club, continue to exploit whatever advantage they feel they have in the draft, and then trade some of those established major leaguers for pitching prospects. These players will then help the team after this wave. That would be an unbelievably deep rebuild, but if they do feel like they have an advantage in amateur player acquisition, it does seem feasible.

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Anderson is the only top prospect to contribute. Soroka *should*. But Fried and Ynoa have both also contributed.

Their bullpen is also a bunch of farm guys (Touki, Newk, Webb, Minter).

Realistically, half your roster is guys who are paid to throw. So all else equal, 50/50. Weighing the injury risk and a potentially higher efficiency in evaluating/developing hitters, it’s not super crazy to want more pitching.

markakis21
4 years ago

Actually I want to get back to the Lowther thing again. His xFIP was 4.77. Which isn’t incredible but is serviceable in Camden Yards and the AL East. His HR/FB was 18.8%, which is obviously unsustainable. His BABIP of .353 was well above career norms. His peripherals look every bit like he could eventually be posting ~4.50-5.00 ERAs as a starter. Which is not very exciting, but would be the 3rd best pitcher on Baltimore right now, and certainly is enough to place him at a 40 FV. It’s kind of mind-boggling to see Wells and Baumann on here but not Lowther.

wily moMember since 2020
4 years ago

when you say you thought about putting an 80 on adley but ultimately decided against it because catcher, so he’s a 70, does that mean there’s no such thing as a 75?

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

No 75s, no 25s.

Bud SmithMember since 2020
4 years ago

What a weird numbering system

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago

Who would be other historic 80s? Any 80 pitchers?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I think if you’re looking at possible 80s (historically) you’re looking at A-Rod, Griffey, and Harper. And that’s probably it. I’d guess Mauer, Bo Jackson or Andruw Jones were the closest 70s. Maybe Vlad Jr.

For pitchers, the closest would probably be Strasburg or Mark Prior. I think you could maybe make a case that both were rated as 80s at the time. Honorable mention for Todd Van Poppel, but I would guess he was probably a 70 (he didn’t have time to build hype in the minors or anything).

Paul Allen
4 years ago

Not even a mention of Yusniel Diaz. Is he just a lost cause at this point?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul Allen

Considering he slashed .157/ .225 / .251 at AAA at age 25 and is probably moving to a corner…yeah, I think that’s a safe guess.

Kevin GoldsteinMember
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul Allen

He was looked at, and one of the last cuts.

softyelectricMember since 2019
4 years ago

Thanks for the great work that is well-appreciated.

From reading this, it sounds to me that, essentially, the consensus conclusion is that there can’t be a 80-grade catching prospect.

This is interesting to me. I guess grades have both “positional value and risk” baked in, and is rather about that than more of a comparison of value among players of that position (or potential positions)?

RonnieDobbs
4 years ago

Rutchman is one of the most overrated prospects of all-time. If he was what he is supposed to be, then he would have laid waste to the minor leagues and be an established star at this point. I am not saying that he probably won’t be a good player, but he is nowhere near the hyperbole. At the point where there is an internal discussion on an annual basis about the generation top prospect you probably should study a little more history. I get that people want to read hyperbole, but it is not sustainable. If AR is not a first ballot Hall of Famer, then this scouting report will look goofy.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

While you may be correct that he is overrated, this reasoning is flawed. He lost an entire year in the minors to COVID, so he’s only had 700 PAs or so in the minors. And yet, if he was playing for the Braves or Padres he’d be in the majors already because they left him in AA for quite a while after he had largely mastered the league. But he plays for a team (like many others) that is keen not to start his service clock too early.

FWIW I’d be totally shocked if he didn’t have at least a couple 3-win seasons, think it’s very likely he will have at least a couple 5-win seasons. He’s undoubtedly the best player in the minors, and since Ohtani wasn’t really a traditional prospect, he’s probably one of the Top 3 prospects of the last 5 years (Franco and Vlad Jr being the others). The biggest concern I would have about him is that catchers tend to get ground down by the physical demands of the position, and would think that his overall career arc will be determined as much by health as by peak.

RonnieDobbs
4 years ago

” Henderson raked as a high schooler against both varsity pitching in the southeast and on the showcase circuit” is irrelevant at this point. “Any indication of potential swing-and-miss issues here are new” is just not true. You got it wrong in the first place. The idea that your opinions are fact and that reality bends around them is off-putting. You make wild assertions and also lack the humility to take accountability for them. I don’t particularly dislike Gunnar, but his HS and showcase antics need to be buried at this point. He was always a gangly looking kid with lots of questions. He has always been more projectable than a finished product.

Baltimore, MurraylandMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Comments that achieve actual Robbie Dobbs-level performance art. Bravo!

Christopher GoreMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

I appreciate that Kevin left out the blurb about how Henderson ran over your dog just because you had concerns about his ability to make hard contact.

deaconbluerayMember since 2025
4 years ago

So if the Rays called the O’s and proposed Franco for Rutschman, straight up, do the O’s say no? Given Franco’s contract, MLB Trade Values says that would be a steal for the O’s. I suppose the three years of age difference also makes a big difference here.

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago
Reply to  deaconblueray

why would the o’s say no?!

markakis21
4 years ago

Yeah, Franco is the only player ever rated higher than Adley, as I recall.

Christopher GoreMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  deaconblueray

As an Orioles fan, sign me up…

Manco
4 years ago

Rodriguez, Cowser, Mayo, and potentially Kjerstad are the guys of interest I will be watching. Rutschman is too known and I don’t prefer to stash catchers with big hype unless they’ve made it into the league already.

The pedigrees given to Grayson surely will attract all flies unaware of how good he was, and will bring on calls for an early ETA. Cowser will likely earn another boost in pedigree by ’23 but I’m very keen on finding out how many levels he can climb. Same with Mayo. The ETAs suggest a few more years so I don’t know what the truth may be, so I’m clearly optimistic. Kjerstad is the last one of intrigue due to his lack of appearances. A big decider for me will be if his hit tool isn’t too much like Kelenic’s big uppercut-esque swings.

So I’m very pleased with the Orioles farm system as there are finally guys to like.

Ryan Kneessi
4 years ago

Yusniel diaz has had issues with injuries but I’m surprised not to see him here at all.

oriolesmagic2012
4 years ago

What level/performance sample do you need in order to place a FV on someone like Rangel, Basallo, etc? I assume it’s just too early or not enough eyes have been put on them, but at what time do you feel comfortable placing an initial FV grade?

markakis21
4 years ago

I don’t understand their logic on the teen DSL signings to be honest. They gave a 45 to a teenager who was one of the O’s lower-cost signings this past period but then didn’t give grades to Basallo or the 7-digit bonus babies from this cycle.

zurzlesMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

For one thing, bonus size doesn’t equate to prospect value, especially when agreements are made at age 14 or younger. For another thing, none of the 45s were signed as teenagers so I don’t know who you’re even talking about. I assume Arias? Afaict he was the only international prospect the Orioles have ever signed that made it to the FG international BOARD. He’s ranked higher because they consider him the better prospect.

markakis21
4 years ago
Reply to  zurzles

Arias yes, I had a brain fart and wrote the wrong number.

Rollie's MustacheMember since 2017
4 years ago

Not even an Orioles fan but Adley’s write-up is a fun write-up. Excited to see the kid in the show.

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago

At 24, shouldn’t Rutschman be almost a finished product? I don’t understand how there’s that much more upside.

But I’m a prospect ignoramus, so Im genuinely curious, not Roganing here.

SenorGato
4 years ago

I’m going to be devastated once Rutschman reaches the Not That Good stage of his career in the years leading into FA. The only way to avoid it is to be Mike Trout good, in which case unless the O’s are amazing the story will be that Actually you don’t need those pesky greedy tippy top players to win, or signing a cartoonishly below market extension early