Can the Baltimore Orioles Salvage Their 2025 Season?

Joe Camporeale-Imagn Images

The good news for the Baltimore Orioles is they won the first game of their three-game series against the first-place New York Yankees on Monday night. The bad news is the win only improved the team’s record to 11-17, the fourth-worst mark in baseball. As it stands Tuesday morning, the Orioles sit in last place in the AL East, and with nearly a fifth of the season over, it’s getting harder to dismiss the poor start as merely a blip.

Where the Orioles have struggled is not that hard to pinpoint: nearly everywhere. The rotation has combined for a 5.62 ERA/5.14 FIP and 6.4 strikeouts per nine innings, numbers that firmly place Baltimore at the bottom of the league. The defense hasn’t been much better, and after a decent start, the offense has evaporated over the last two weeks.

The season is longer than just April, of course, and the Orioles theoretically still have plenty of time to right the ship. But do they have the deckhands? To show whether or not they do, I took the current Orioles depth chart, and estimated the projected WAR based on playing time, using both ZiPS WAR from the preseason and the updated ZiPS WAR I ran overnight. Let’s start with the offense.

ZiPS ROS Projections – Baltimore Orioles Hitters
Player PA ROS WAR (Based on Preseason) ROS WAR
Gunnar Henderson 533 4.8 4.5
Adley Rutschman 485 4.0 3.7
Cedric Mullins 486 2.4 2.6
Jordan Westburg 400 2.6 2.3
Jackson Holliday 452 2.4 2.0
Colton Cowser 342 1.9 1.8
Tyler O’Neill 365 2.1 1.8
Ryan O’Hearn 359 1.2 1.4
Heston Kjerstad 353 1.6 1.4
Ramón Urías 214 1.0 1.0
Ryan Mountcastle 423 0.9 0.4
Ramón Laureano 208 0.8 0.7
Gary Sánchez 186 0.2 -0.1
Coby Mayo 110 0.4 0.3
Jorge Mateo 116 0.5 0.4
Dylan Carlson 87 0.3 0.3
Maverick Handley 21 0.0 0.0
Vimael Machín 17 0.0 0.0
Chadwick Tromp 5 0.0 0.0
Total 5,162 27.2 24.4

All in all, the offense has shed about three wins from its rest-of-season projections. While no individual Orioles player’s April is enough to cause a fundamental change in his outlook, it’s notable how these projections have eroded across the board — which explains the team’s overall decline in projected production. Of the 19 players listed here, only two have seen their rest-of-season projections improve over the last month, Cedric Mullins and Ryan O’Hearn.

The silver lining for the Orioles is that even with that reduced outlook from their hitters, their projected 25 WAR would give them the sixth-best group of position players in baseball. ZiPS likes Baltimore’s batters less than it did in March, but it’s a matter of degree. Even so, losing three future wins still matters quite a bit considering that this team is starting at the back of the pack. It’s far too soon to say something is actually broken with the offense, but urgency ought to create a less risk-averse approach. It’s almost undeniable at this point that Coby Mayo, who is currently beating up on Triple-A pitchers, has more upside than Ramón Laureano and Ryan Mountcastle. Sure, maybe Mayo would come with some risk, but how can a team that’s struggling to score runs justify not promoting him?

Let’s move on to the pitching.

ZiPS ROS Projections – Baltimore Orioles Pitchers
Player IP ROS WAR (Based on Preseason) ROS WAR
Zach Eflin 135 2.0 1.9
Félix Bautista 50 1.5 1.4
Grayson Rodriguez 76 1.1 1.1
Kyle Gibson 119 0.7 0.7
Dean Kremer 115 1.4 1.1
Keegan Akin 58 0.7 0.8
Tomoyuki Sugano 133 1.0 1.2
Charlie Morton 112 1.0 0.3
Cade Povich 61 0.6 0.5
Seranthony Domínguez 52 0.2 0.5
Yennier Cano 51 0.8 0.9
Gregory Soto 50 0.5 0.6
Kyle Bradish 18 0.4 0.3
Brandon Young 36 0.3 0.3
Cionel Pérez 49 0.4 -0.2
Bryan Baker 51 0.1 0.3
Albert Suarez 32 0.1 0.1
Andrew Kittredge 40 0.3 0.4
Trevor Rogers 19 0.2 0.2
Tyler Wells 8 0.1 0.1
Chayce McDermott 16 0.2 0.1
Colin Selby 28 0.0 0.0
Walter Pennington 17 0.0 0.0
Cody Poteet 15 0.1 0.1
Kade Strowd 33 -0.1 -0.2
Grant Wolfram 22 0.0 0.1
Matt Bowman 43 -0.1 0.1
Total 1,439 13.5 12.6

The pitching projections have changed less than the hitting/fielding ones, in large part because the bullpen, with a 3.77 FIP, has been considerably better than the rotation. But it’s not exactly an auspicious sign that a team with an ERA over 5.00 is projected for a relatively small decrease in production. Rather, these new projections indicate that this collection of pitchers, as currently configured, would be a problem even if it was playing up to preseason expectations. Obviously, it would be great if Dean Kremer could keep the ball in the park and Charlie Morton could avoid allowing nearly a walk an inning, but even if these and other things happen, the O’s still would project to have one of the lousiest pitching staffs of the playoff contenders.

Without a common thread weaving together the lineup’s struggles, it’s hard to blame the organization itself for its talented hitters simply not hitting. But Baltimore’s poor pitching staff is absolutely the fault of the front office and ownership, because what we’re seeing here is a failure of design rather than player execution. Before last season, the Orioles faced a similar lack of high-end pitching, and they addressed it in the short term when they traded for Corbin Burnes. This time around, though, after the departure of Burnes to free agency, the team sat by and watched frontline starter after frontline starter come off the market without signing any of them. Instead of replacing Burnes, Baltimore built a Potemkin rotation. As the Yankees were signing Max Fried and the Red Sox were picking up Garrett Crochet, the Orioles added the 41-year-old Morton, Sugano, and later, Kyle Gibson. Unfortunately for the O’s, you can’t weave several no. 4 starters together and make an ace.

Even with their ramshackle rotation, the Orioles remain a realistic contender, but as we’ve seen over the last few weeks, their margin for error is thin. They can’t bank on their offense to always bail out their inadequate starting staff, and it’s too late to play the free-agent game and go after Fried or Blake Snell or re-sign Burnes. The trade options at the moment aren’t great, either. It’s probably too late now to try and work out a Dylan Cease trade with the Padres, and Sandy Alcantara has really struggled in his return from Tommy John surgery. Perhaps Baltimore could buy low on the 2022 NL Cy Young winner, but such a trade would certainly come with some risk. In other words, assured salvation is unlikely to come from outside the organization, at least not until more teams drop out of the playoff race.

At the start of the season, ZiPS gave the Orioles a 30% chance to win the AL East and a 63% shot to make the postseason. Those probabilities have dropped to 5% and 19%, respectively. This is not a lost season quite yet, but time is not on Baltimore’s side.

The Roman consul Appius Claudius Caecus is known for the saying Faber est suae quisque fortunae, roughly meaning “every man is the architect of his own fortune.” The Orioles have had some unlucky breaks this season, but their struggles this year have largely been forged in the Camden Yards smithy.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

98 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
opifijiklMember since 2024
20 days ago

I would assume that the Orioles saw this pitching conundrum coming and didn’t execute properly? They executed the season before by getting Burnes. Were they not thinking out of the Box enough? Unlucky? Complacent?

What would you ask Elias if you had the chance?

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
20 days ago
Reply to  opifijikl

“How much did ownership tie your hands?”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
20 days ago
Reply to  opifijikl

I am not sure how I would phrase this question but he seems to think that his team can spin straw into gold on the pitching side. I would really like to know if he has changed his mind on this or if he’s just going to keep going (as long as he is in the front office).

eph1970Member since 2025
20 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Good question. Two things I see: Camden Yards is a launching pad for homers and signing free agent pitchers is always risky (and expensive). Unless you have a huge budget, the best strategy seems to be to use the draft and IFRs to build a staff. Most will fail, but if that gives you depth, taking on risk seems reasonable.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
20 days ago
Reply to  eph1970

I have always felt like the best strategy overall is to take position players in the first round and maybe the second and then just take pitchers from then on.

But the Orioles’ philosophy is to stack the first five rounds with position players and then target a bunch of low level pitchers in trades.

They’re both kind of the same idea—an army of FV40 prospects is often a better investment than one FV50, since you will often find more good pitchers later. It got them Bradish, who will be great if he stays healthy, and maybe Povich will get better, but aside from that they’ve completely struck out.

Which makes sense. In these trades you have to know something about these low level prospects that the teams they are trading with don’t know. That might have worked in Houston, but everyone knows that some of these traits are good to target now.

CousinNicky
20 days ago
Reply to  opifijikl

Who should they have signed?

The top 10 free agents havent been that great so far,

  1. Burnes – yikes and advanced numbers look bad too
  2. Fried – very good similar to his career so far
  3. Snell – injured
  4. Flaherty – okay/good still a high homerun rate
  5. Manea – injured
  6. Eovaldi – very good but a little lucky with a low babip
  7. Kikuchi -avg/kinda bad with a terrible walk rate
  8. Wacha – pretty good but a very lucky homerun rate so far
  9. Severino – okay/good but K% is dipping a little
  10. Pivetta – very good but homerun rate is unsustainable

Eovaldi is the only pitcher here who was under 150 million and has been very good and also not expected to fall back to earth in the next month(looking at you pivetta and wacha)

also of note, i would 100% trade for alcantra right now if possible, his numbers dont look good right now, but location can be improved with time and more games, but he is still getting elite GB% and throwing 98 with the heater. the homerun rate is a little high right now but that should avg out a little as well. He is a perfect buy low IMO

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
20 days ago
Reply to  CousinNicky

this is a lot of hindsighting; signing Burnes, Snell, Fried, etc. would have absolutely made sense for the Os, and I’d still take any of them over their current options

sadtromboneMember since 2020
20 days ago

I don’t know, those salaries were crazy at the time except for Flaherty and Pivetta, and they already had Flaherty once and didn’t seem too excited to try that out again.

It’s hard to blame the Orioles for not topping the $218M the Yankees gave to Fried (the best pitcher of that group in 2025 so far IIRC)

lacslyer
20 days ago
Reply to  CousinNicky

You’re trying to defend the Orioles for basically doing nothing by suggesting that because a lot of the top free agent pitchers haven’t been good or have been injured they weren’t wrong in doing nothing. I’d expect a team that’s clearly in a win-now mode to at the very least spend money to replace the starter they lost.

Anything otherwise is defenseless regardless of how many free agent pitchers aren’t successful in the first month of the season with their new teams. The point is they didn’t do anything to get better, and you’re here trying to congratulate them for that because some of these guys haven’t done well so far.

jdbolickMember since 2024
20 days ago
Reply to  lacslyer

You’re trying to defend the Orioles for basically doing nothing 

Saying that the Orioles did “nothing” is blatantly false given that they increased payroll more this winter than any other team except the Dodgers. You can argue they spent money very badly, but not that they basically did nothing.

I said at the time that Charlie Morton was a terrible decision, but this season has started so poorly that it hasn’t really mattered. If Elias had spent $225 million to beat the Yankees for Fried, the O’s would be 13-16 instead of 11-18. The far bigger concern is the lineup regression, especially given how it wilted during the playoffs as well.

Rutschman is looking like 2024 wasn’t a fluke. Westburg is looking like 2024 was a fluke for him, as he’s back to his 2023 level. Then Kjerstad is looking hopeless, while Holliday isn’t much better and has been atrocious defensively.

Old Washington Senators FanMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

All of this is analyzing far too few games and far too little data. Regression to the mean works both ways. The Orioles pitchers will pitch better and the hitters will hit better as the season goes on…but will it be soon enough and will the other teams in their division – all but Tampa Bay are looking to be better than last season – regress the other way enough?

We’ll know, I think, by about the all-star break.

jdbolickMember since 2024
19 days ago

All of this is analyzing far too few games and far too little data.

I wish that were the case, but it isn’t, as the lineup regression began around the all-star break last season. Westburg went from a wRC+ of 131 over the first half in 2024 to 98 in the second half. Rutschman similarly went from a 123 wRC+ in the first half of last season to a 70 wRC+ in the second half. Ryan Mountcastle went from a 116 wRC+ in the first half of last season to a 90 wRC+ in the second half.

The hope was that last season’s fade was due to fatigue and/or injuries, however, those struggles have persisted into the first two months of this season, making the sample much more worrisome.

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
19 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Couldn’t they have offered a better package than BOS for Crochet? Heck, Brady Singer. They still have a bit of a logjam in the OF. Instead looks like the O’s will be rebuilding again in 3-4 years. Its a shame if one of the best young position player cores to come along since the HOU/Cubs rebuilds doesn’t win a playoff series. Especially in a med/small market you have to cash in and maintain a committed fan base.

jdbolickMember since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  LMOTFOTE

Couldn’t they have offered a better package than BOS for Crochet? 

The White Sox wanted Basallo for Crochet, which is something I wouldn’t do either. The Red Sox had a deep farm system with second tier prospects like Teel and Montgomery who would help the White Sox, but that Boston wouldn’t miss. The Orioles didn’t have any of those prospects left to trade after acquiring Burnes and Eflin.

They still have a bit of a logjam in the OF. 

I don’t know why people keep saying this because there is no logjam anywhere in Baltimore. You need more than three outfielders during a season, as we’re seeing now with Cowser’s broken thumb. Kjerstad is currently ninth on the team in PAs, but he has done little with them.

remember2004Member since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I’m devastated we gave up Teel, Montgomery and Meidroth and don’t regard them as second tier prospects at all.

I’m also incredibly happy we received Crochet and extended him.

It’s the risk you take to get the desired outcome and sometimes it’s really painful…….but necessary!

jdbolickMember since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  remember2004

Teel and Montgomery are absolutely second tier prospects, as they are in the ~50-75 range rather than being top 10 like Basallo or Anthony. Boston has an incredible collection of young outfielders, so they won’t really miss Montgomery.

lacslyer
18 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Note, when I said basically did nothing I was clearly referring to their rotation. Not getting a free agent starter while losing your best one and not having a replacement for him is the equivalent of doing nothing to me. Signing a couple guys to one year contracts is doing something, but in reality, it’s more to appease people and make it look like you’re trying.

If they got Fried they’d not just likely be 13-16, but have a true ace on their staff with playoff experience. To suggest that the price of Fried would only be a few extra wins at this point is pretty egregious.

Your concern is lineup regression when they have one of the worst pitching staffs in the league and the worst starting rotation in the league by fwar? They’re league average in runs/game. They could average 5 runs a game instead of 4 and they’d still lose more games than they’d win because their pitching is so bad.

Last edited 18 days ago by lacslyer
jdbolickMember since 2024
17 days ago
Reply to  lacslyer

Note, when I said basically did nothing I was clearly referring to their rotation

If the Orioles had tried to replace Burnes with internal candidates and not signed anyone, that would be “basically doing nothing.” Signing Sugano and Morton is not “basically doing nothing.” You could argue that it wasn’t sufficient or that it was a bad use of that money, but saying that it was “basically doing nothing” is factually incorrect.

As an aside, I will never understand why some people are so allergic to admit when they say something false. I get things wrong every single day, as we all do. When someone corrects a statement like the one you made, a mature response would be to acknowledge the correction.

If they got Fried they’d not just likely be 13-16, but have a true ace on their staff with playoff experience. To suggest that the price of Fried would only be a few extra wins at this point is pretty egregious.

To suggest that the addition of Fried would only be a few extra wins at this point is literally true. Over the course of the season, obviously you would expect the difference to grow larger, but you’re pretending that it would somehow have made a massive difference right now when we know that is not the case. There have been so many things that have gone wrong for Baltimore this season that adding Fried would not change their current position in the standings.

Your concern is lineup regression when they have one of the worst pitching staffs in the league and the worst starting rotation in the league by fwar?

Yes, because Eflin will return somewhat soon, Rodriguez will hopefully be back in June, and Kyle Bradish is expected back in August. If the lineup does not return to its previous excellence then none of that matters.

Jason BMember since 2017
19 days ago
Reply to  CousinNicky

This sure is a lot of handwaving away several pitchers who have been excellent in the first month. Whether they can be uniformly great over the course of the season (much less the entire contract), you don’t think the Orioles’ outlook for the season would be markedly different with what Fried, Wacha, and/or Pivetta have done so far?

Last edited 19 days ago by Jason B
jdbolickMember since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  Jason B

you don’t think the Orioles’ outlook for the season would be markedly different with what Fried, Wacha, and/or Pivetta have done so far?

Correct. If the Orioles had added any one of those pitchers, they would still be in last place due to the sheer number of things that have gone wrong.

Jason BMember since 2017
19 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Eh, I dunno. Being 3.5 games out of first at the end of April versus being 6.5 game out definitely feels different

jdbolickMember since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  Jason B

That would be different, but none of those pitchers have been worth three WAR at the end of April. You’re talking about less than two, which would still have Baltimore in last place.

lacslyer
18 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Right, but again you’re looking at this in hindsight. Just because these free agents haven’t been lights out doesn’t mean they can’t be, and doesn’t mean the Orioles were right to not get them.

Think of it this way. Are you happier with them not paying for any of the above listed free agents and saving money or with them having these experienced players who could make an impact even if it’s not in the first month of the season?

At this point by doing what they did with the rotation – practically nothing – they’re more than a handful of games back and show no sign of being able to make it up despite having another 130 games left in their season. So the season is basically over after the first month because they chose not to spend money and had bad luck.

jdbolickMember since 2024
17 days ago
Reply to  lacslyer

Just because these free agents haven’t been lights out doesn’t mean they can’t be

They should get better and presumably so will Morton. As noted, I opposed that signing, yet no one expected him to be this bad.

 Are you happier with them not paying for any of the above listed free agents and saving money

They didn’t save money. They increased payroll by more than anyone in baseball except the Dodgers. With every comment, you keep proving that you do not follow the Orioles and know pretty much nothing about them.

At this point by doing what they did with the rotation – practically nothing

Repeating that Elias did “practically nothing” or “basically doing nothing” over and over again will not suddenly make that a true statement. It’s factually wrong.

So the season is basically over after the first month because they chose not to spend money and had bad luck.

Again, your comments show that you are not informed sufficiently regarding the Orioles to make an intelligent comment. Not only did they increase payroll the second most of any team, Elias offered Burnes the highest AAV of any pitcher in the history of the sport.