Henry Owens to Debut in Boston

With Rick Porcello headed to the disabled list following a triceps injury, the Red Sox were in need of a starting pitcher for tonight’s start against the Yankees. Rather than turning to a Triple-A scrub to take Porcello’s spot in the rotation, the Sox opted to call up top prospect Henry Owens. Owens will take the mound in Yankee stadium tonight for his big league debut.

Owens, 22, has pitched exclusively at Triple-A Pawtucket this year, where he’s put up a 3.16 ERA and 3.68 FIP over 122 innings of work. The 6-foot-6 lefty has struck out 21% of the batters he’s faced, and has walked 11%. Other than Owens’ height, none of the figures cited above sound particularly impressive. Owens’ strikeout rate is hardly better than the International League average of 18.6%, and his walk rate is significantly worse than average. If you didn’t know any better, you might look at Owens’ 2015 stat line and conclude that he’s a fringe prospect.

Owens’ 2015 numbers may not be much to look at, but he performed markedly better in his first three seasons as a pro. In 2012, the year after the Red Sox took him 36th overall, Owens struck out 29% of opponent batters faced in Low-A. The next year, he whiffed 30% between High-A and Double-A in 2013. However, while the strikeouts were certainly encouraging, his 11% walk rate inflated his FIP to 3.61 over that span.

Owens chipped away at his walk problem last season, when he walked a perfectly acceptable 9% of batters faced between Double-A and Triple-A. Coupled with a 26% strikeout rate, this made for a solid overall performance, and was enough to vault him into the top 50 on just about every prospect list.

Although those walks have resurfaced this year, Owens has fared substantially better of late, especially in the walks department. Over his last nine starts, he’s recorded a 2.64 ERA and 2.83 FIP, on the strength of an uncharacteristic 6% walk rate. Here’s a visualization of Owens’ walk rate by way of a time series graph. The trend is clear.

BB

Unsurprisingly, his FIP has moved in lockstep with his plummeting walks.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

FIP

Despite his unremarkable season-wide numbers, KATOH is still relatively bullish on Owens’ future. My system forecasts him for 4.9 WAR through age-28, which would have made him the 67th ranked prospect on KATOH’s preseason list. This forecast is down a notch from his 6.2 WAR projection yielded by his 2014 numbers.

Let’s pull up some comps. Using league-adjusted, regressed stats, along with age, I calculated the Mahalanobis distance between Owens’ 2015 stats and every season at Triple-A since 1991 in which a pitcher faced at least 350 batters. Below, you’ll find a list of historical players whose performances were nearest and dearest to Owens’, ranked from most similar to least similar.

Rank Mah Dist Name IP through 28 WAR through 28
1 0.89 Damian Moss 362 0.3
2 0.92 Jason Hirsh 166 0.6
3 1.25 Anthony Ranaudo* 55 0.0
4 1.38 Sun-Woo Kim 337 1.4
5 1.67 Greg Gohr 183 0.5
6 1.72 Charlie Haeger 83 0.0
7 1.87 Julio Valera 304 3.1
8 1.98 Nick Kingham* 0 0.0
9 2.01 Roy Halladay 1,116 25.0
10 2.02 Justin Wilson* 176 1.6
11 2.19 Bob Wickman 532 5.6
12 2.44 Russ Springer 352 1.3
13 2.57 Roger Pavlik 671 8.6
14 2.58 John Patterson 423 6.5
15 2.59 Mike Meyers 0 0.0
16 2.73 Andy Ashby 710 7.5
17 2.75 Tim Pugh 355 2.1
18 2.80 Scott Service 91 0.0
19 2.82 Rodrigo Rosario 8 0.2
20 2.87 Sean Nolin* 2 0.0

*Pitchers who have yet to play their age-28 seasons.

Aside from Roy Halladay, that’s not a particularly exciting list of names. To be fair, though, many of these pitchers didn’t have anywhere near the type of stuff that Owens does. Per Kiley McDaniel, Owens’ fastball sits between 90 mph and 92 mph with good deception, extension, command and movement, and also wields a solid-average curveball and plus changeup. Oh yeah, and he’s also a lefty.

Relatively few pitchers come through the minors with stuff of that caliber, and Damian Moss and Charlie Haeger certainly weren’t among those few. Let’s thin the field a bit by weeding out the non-prospects, and zeroing in on the guys who were either drafted in the first round or cracked Baseball America’s top 100 list the winter before their Owens-esqe seasons.

Rank Mah Dist Name IP through 28 WAR through 28
2 0.92 Jason Hirsh 166 0.6
3 1.25 Anthony Ranaudo* 55 0.0
7 1.87 Julio Valera 304 3.1
8 1.98 Nick Kingham* 0 0.0
9 2.01 Roy Halladay 1,116 25.0
12 2.44 Russ Springer 352 1.3
14 2.58 John Patterson 423 6.5

*Pitchers who have yet to play their age-28 seasons.

Other than Roy Halladay, who blossomed into the best pitcher in baseball, none of these names are particularly impressive. Even among the prospects, we find a bunch of players who never quite lived up to expectations. A couple of these pitchers — Jason Hirsh and John Patterson — had otherwise promising careers derailed by injuries, while Julio Valera and Russ Springer simply never stuck in big league rotations. The jury’s still out on Anthony Ranaudo and Nick Kingham, but the outlook doesn’t look great for either pitcher. Ranaudo has a 4.60 FIP as a 25-year-old in Triple-A, while Kingham recently underwent Tommy John surgery.

Does the collective failure of the non-Halladay members of this group mean that Owens is a long shot to have a successful career? No, of course not. It would be foolish to make any conclusions about a prospect’s trajectory based on just a handful of players, no matter how similar they looked at the same age. However, the names above do a fine job of illustrating the risks associated with Owens, and more broadly, with pitching prospects in general. Like Owens, Hirsh and Valera looked like perfectly fine pitching prospects when they’re called up, but were bounced from the league just a few years later.

Tonight’s debut at Yankee Stadium notwithstanding, Owens will have the luxury of breaking into the majors in a relatively low-pressure scenario. At 47-59, the Red Sox are all but mathematically eliminated from the playoff race. So John Farrell will have little reason not send Owens out there every fifth day, even if his pesky walk problem resurfaces. Over the next two months, the Red Sox should gain a sense of what they have in Owens. And if all goes as is expected, he could easily wind up being an important part of the next competitive Red Sox team.





Chris works in economic development by day, but spends most of his nights thinking about baseball. He writes for Pinstripe Pundits, FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. He's also on the twitter machine: @_chris_mitchell None of the views expressed in his articles reflect those of his daytime employer.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
arc
11 years ago

Sox fans are saying the organization has instructed Owens to primarily throw his curveball instead of his plus-change this year for development purposes, leading to lower K-rates.

Sounds plausible, but also sounds like something easy to just make up. It’ll be interesting to see how he uses his arsenal after the promotion. I assume you forget about development and use your best weapons.

Meh
11 years ago
Reply to  arc

You beat me to it, but as a Pawsox fan who has seen him this year I can absolutely confirm this theory.

ed
11 years ago

Debut “in” Boston or “for” Boston. Game is in Yankees stadium

Meh
11 years ago

Owens had really stayed away from his change-up this season in an attempt to better develop his slider and curve. His recent hot stretch has seen the return of his change to some degree, and I think it was a concerted effort to work on those pitches while realizing the performance wouldn’t be as strong as possible. I wish more pitchers would try this, Henry could cruise through A ball with that change, but developing a third and possibly fourth average-ish pitch would be best for his development.

Savin Hillbilly
11 years ago
Reply to  Meh

If last night is any indication, the extra time spent on his breaking pitches was well spent. He got three strikeouts with the slider (including Ellsbury twice) and a called K and a couple of popups with the curve. According to soxprospects.com, the slider is a new pitch this year. He should stick with it–it looks like it has the potential to be a good swing-and-miss pitch against LHH, and will allow him to rely less on the change. The curve he was using mostly backdoor to RHH.

Jon
11 years ago

I don’t have a source, but I believe it was Alex Speier who had said that Owens problems earlier this year could have stemmed from him gaining 10-15 lbs over this past offseason. Getting/keeping his body under control will always be the issue for a lanky, 6’6″ lefty, so the added weight may have played a part in that.

Also something to note:

Henry Owens, last 9 AAA starts: 9 GS, 58 IP, 8.07 K/9, 2.17 BB/9, 2.83 FIP

Eduardo Rodriguez AAA before callup: 8 GS, 48.1 IP, 8.19 K/9, 1.3 BB/9, 2.32 FIP

Wildcard09
11 years ago

This is good news, was wondering if I’d have a reason to tune into the Sox game tonight, guess I will for at least the first 6 or so innings.

youngmichael
11 years ago

Solid article, but I think we need a formal Fangraph policy prohibiting articles like this unless they have at least one GIF embedded.

John Farrell
11 years ago

Who is John Manuel?

Tough Luck
11 years ago

Hard for a kid who is struggling with walks a little to come up against NYY. As a team, the Yankees swing at the 2nd fewest number of balls, and walk at the 5th best rate in the league. Their 2-3-4 with Gardner, Rodriguez, and Teixeira all are tough outs if you don’t throw strikes.

Should be interesting to watch, at least if he isn’t walking them around the diamond.

GoOppo
11 years ago

As someone, like the people who wrote before me who has followed HO against the Yanks,if his fastball is commanded at least decently, (it can be incredibly deceptive judging by some swings he’s elicited) and he doesn’t throw too many of those awesome changeups, and breaks off a few decent curves to keep people honest. I believe he will surprise a ot of people watching a guy throw 89,91. Glad he’s up and hope he makes an good impression as this is probably one of the stiffer tests he could have recieved. From seeing him up in Pawtucket once this year and once late last summer, both outings I saw were guys late on 88mph fastballs and flailing at 88mph changeups that almost looked like screwballs from the third baseline.

GoOppo
11 years ago
Reply to  GoOppo

78* mph changeups

jca cpa ca
11 years ago

looking forward to the Severino article tomorrow. I was just looking at his stats and was actually surprised that he wasn’t overblown by the Yankee Hype Machine

Damaso
11 years ago
Reply to  jca cpa ca

think its pretty clear now that everything yankees has been severly underhyped lately, not overhyped.

everdamaso
11 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

lol

TommyfastballMember since 2016
11 years ago

Thank you for your work, but isn’t it low-value to look at 4 months of AAA, when there is a stated huge difference even between the beginning and end of the 4 months, in the absence of a 3-year minor league record? I just don’t know why I’d even pay attention to the table.

omar quintanilla
11 years ago

Interesting article, wish I had read it before the game, but given that the game has now taken place: Thought he looked pretty good, got in a nice groove after a very laborious first inning and put away 10+ in a row before the game took an abrupt turn. Not too bad against that lineup,but he’ll get killed next time he faces them if he can’t keep the ball in the strike zone when he pitches down. Is pitching up in the zone with the fastball and down with the change his thing?

RedSoxFan
11 years ago

Read an article that the down tick in performance the first half of this year wasn’t unexpected as they needed time to develop his 3rd pitch, his curve ball. Once that started controlling that, things went better.

He was good last night. Looking forward to more.

DNA+
11 years ago

Just one start, and I am sure he was quite nervous, but his stuff was not impressive. Poor command of a low 90’s fastball, and a very unimpressive curve. Spent a lot of time pitching in bad counts and was quite fortunate to get the results he did. He will definitely need better command than he had last night to survive.

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  DNA+

Interesting. I didn’t watch the game so I can’t disagree with you, but you rarely see a 20% K-BB rate result from unimpressive stuff.

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  DNA+

Huh. I just went to watch the game highlights and saw the following clip of Owens striking out the first batter of the game on the curveball you described as “very unimpressive”…?

http://m.redsox.mlb.com/bos/video/v330732683/bosnyy-owens-fans-ellsbury-for-first-mlb-strikeout/?affiliateId=clubMEGAMENU

It’s possible to have a bad curve overall and come up with a good one occasionally, but that was not what I expected to see after reading your comment.

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  arc

http://m.redsox.mlb.com/bos/video/v331408183/bosnyy-owens-tosses-fiveplus-frames-in-mlb-debut/?affiliateId=clubMEGAMENU

So three of his five strikeouts came from his very unimpressive curve. That’s a pretty good pitch to have as your worst pitch. I guess I am a lot easier to impress than you.

Savin Hillbilly
11 years ago
Reply to  arc

That was the slider, BTW. Kind of a slow slurvy pitch, around 78-80 mph, but with good horizontal movement. As long as he can locate it as well as he did there (and on his second Ellsbury K, which was more or less the same pitch), it’ll be a good out pitch to LHH. The curve is around 75 mph, and more vertical.

Savin Hillbilly
11 years ago

More specifically, of the five K’s in the clip, four were on the slider, and one on the curve (the generous backdoor called K to Chris Young, third of the five).

DNA+
11 years ago

He threw several big floaty ones with poor shape that the hitters just scoffed at. Also, the one that Headley hit to the warning track was a hanger that he was lucky to keep in the yard.