Mike Pelfrey Gets Two Years from the Tigers

The Tigers just signed Mike Pelfrey to a two-year deal worth $16 million. The big right-hander has a good fastball, a penchant for licking his fingers, and a split-finger that’s decent for grounders, but he still shows up on the bottom of an important leaderboard. Despite that, he’s been an average major league player four times in his career, and he’s projected to be worth the deal.

Turns out, he has one ability that is elite. And if he continues to display that skill, the Tigers will have made out on this short deal.

Last year, among pitchers that threw at least 160 innings, Pelfrey had the worst strikeout minus walk rate in baseball. That comes with the second-worst strikeout rate, and the slightly above-average control couldn’t make up for it.

Up the sample, and the results are the same. He’s third-worst in baseball in strikeouts minus walks since 2007. Only Livan Hernandez and Kyle Kendrick have thrown 1000 innings since then and struck out fewer batters. And because strikeouts and walks are so important to most pitching metrics, he’s bottom-three in SIERA and bottom-five in xFIP, and the only active pitcher worse than him in multiple spots is Kendrick, who was paid $5.5 million last year and may not have a job ready for him after the season he had last year.

He’s only bottom-20 in FIP, though, and that’s mostly because his home run rate (0.72 per nine) is better than average. He’s actually top-four, in a good way, when it comes to home runs per fly ball. Only Clayton Kershaw, Adam Wainwright, and Justin Verlander have shown a better ability to suppress the home run.

As exciting as those names are, you have to look to the group just behind Pelfrey for a more sobering appraisal of this skill: Chad Billingsley, Matt Cain, and Jered Weaver all showed this skill for a while, and then lost it, sometimes in spectacular fashion. Cain, in particular, inspired a series of posts from Dave Cameron and others on suppressing home runs.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The one-sentence sum of those pieces is: you probably can’t suppress home runs per fly ball reliably, at least not for long. That’s why it takes 9.4 years — more than nine years! — for a pitcher’s home run per fly ball rate to stabilize. Pelfrey has actually crossed that threshold, since he’s allowed 1287 fly balls, when 1234 was the number Derek Carty found.

But it’s important to remember what stabilization means. It means that, going forward, the pitcher’s demonstrated ability in home run suppression is just as important the league average. So, even though he’s shown some skill, he’s not likely to show that same exact skill going forward. And, if his walk rate regresses to his career rate, Pelfrey will end up being a replacement level pitcher, under contract for two years at the price of about a win.

On the other hand, the Tigers may have a different idea about home run suppression. Maybe they see enough in the sinker and splitter to believe in old-fashioned home run suppression (ground balls). At least the bet they’ve placed on this skill is a small one, relatively.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Domingo Ayala
10 years ago

The tigers actually have some pretty decent pitching depth, I’m surprised they didn’t go for someone who is more high risk high reward.

doughboyMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

this tigers fan is curious to learn more about this “pretty decent pitching depth” you speak of…

Za
10 years ago
Reply to  doughboy

I think he’s referring to high minors guys who project at least as Major League #4/5 with much higher upside – Vaniel Norris, Matt Boyd, and Michael Fulmer come to mind.

Domingo Ayala
10 years ago
Reply to  doughboy

Assuming Norris gets a spot, you’d have to imagine that one of Fulmer, Boyd, Green, Farmer, Lobstein, Cessa, Verhaagen, or Ryan are going to end up being an OK 5th starter.