404Page Not Found
You might be looking for:
If you still can't find what you are looking for, please contact us!

Nate McLouth and the Improved Braves Outfield

It makes me shudder to think how the Braves outfield would have performed in 2010 if they hadn’t broken camp with Jason Heyward in right. He was far and away the team’s best outfielder, producing 5.0 WAR in 623 PA. The other seven Braves outfielders combined for 0.3 WAR. Thanks to some offseason maneuvers, the Braves can count on better production in 2011.

The first measure of improvement was to remove dead weight. In 2010 Melky Cabrera produced -1.2 WAR thanks to a .294 wOBA and -15.9 UZR. After the season the Braves cut him, leaving his spot in left field open for Martin Prado, who moved there after the Dan Uggla trade. In the last three years Prado has produced a .356 wOBA and 8.4 WAR in 1408 PA, which quickly turns Cabrera’s negative production into a positive. Prado’s bat might not profile as well in left, but his .352 wOBA would have ranked ninth among left fielders with at least 500 PA last year. Cabrera’s wOBA ranked last in that group.

That brings us to Nate McLouth. The second measure of improvement should have been to find a center fielder who can at least platoon with him, if not replace him completely. But the Braves did not do that. Instead, they placed their faith in McLouth. Fredi Gonzalez has said that his ideal lineup has McLouth hitting second. That’s a lot of confidence in a player who produced -1.3 WAR, including a .283 wOBA, in just 288 PA last year. Clearly, the Braves expect McLouth to bounce back to the form he displayed in the previous two seasons.

A solid finish to the season and a torrid spring must have the Braves feeling good about their decision. In his final 68 PA last year, following his recall from the minors, McLouth hit .263/.358/.509, which is right around his 2008 production. We can’t read much into that, though, both because of the small sample and because September baseball often produces outlying results (thanks to expanded rosters). A shoulder injury has limited him to just 26 spring training at-bats, but he has hit safely in nine of those, including three for extra bases, and has walked an additional eight times. But since spring training numbers are even more dubious than September numbers, it’s tough to draw a conclusion of any kind based on these samples. It might represent an encouraging development, but that’s about it.

Even if McLouth doesn’t return to his previous form, even if he only recovers somewhat and produces a .320 wOBA, the Braves should be fine. Last year the team’s left fielders hit a collective .242/.302/.385. Prado and, in part-time work, Eric Hinske will out-produce this line handily. The team’s center fielders fared a bit better, at .232/.329/.339. That’s a low baseline of expectations for McLouth, even given his down year. If he produces to that level, the Braves should realize a markedly improved outfield in 2011. If he recovers to his 2009 level they’ll have one of the stronger units in the NL.





Joe also writes about the Yankees at River Ave. Blues.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Temo
15 years ago

You’re right that September numbers and spring training numbers don’t mean much. However what DOES mean a lot to mean is the endorsement of fellow players and coaches.

Last year at this time Nate was struggling immensely in spring training; his time was all off and Bobby Cox was putting him in remedial games to try and get him back to where he needs to be. This season the comments about McLouth have been completely the opposite. Players and Coaches are saying that he looks much more like the Pirates McLouth rather than the 2010 Braves version.

Big JgkeMember since 2020
15 years ago

Is Schaefer cooked as a potential impact player?

Seattleite
15 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

It seems like “impact” might be stretching it to me (though, I guess that depends on your definition of impact).

The guy lost a lot of development time to the suspension and the injury, so it seems like he might be able to put it back together at some point. Though, he seems more like a 4th outfielder to me… or maybe a fringy starting CF. Think Carlos Gomez.

But hey, what do I know? I’m just some guy on the internet.

test
15 years ago

Is there a study somehwere that confirms September numbers have a higher variance, or is it just something that everyone assumes is true because it “makes sense”? It seems like it would be easy enough to figure out (players with 50+PA each month, or 20+ IP, variance from seasonal averages), but I don’t remember ever seeing it.

wobatus
15 years ago
Reply to  test

You’re nominated to do the study.

Dizzave17
15 years ago
Reply to  test

I think the main thing is that one single month is too small a sample size in and of itself, be it September or July or March (ST). The dilution of talent in September just makes an already unreliable sample that much murkier to put any stock in.

Micah
15 years ago

“Dead weight” is intended to be a figurative expression in the article, but when applied to Melky Cabrera, it can be taken quite literally.

He at least looked as if he had literally died when he was out there as I’m sure a dead whale laying in the outfield couldn’t perform much worse. (The batter’s out if the ball lands on the body, right? That’s about what it looked like when the ball was hit to him anyway.) And, well, the weight part doesn’t really need explanation.

I sense the phrasing here was intentional…and true.

Bronnt
15 years ago
Reply to  Micah

I will miss the creative routes he took to balls, though. There’s the “Loopdy-whirl” and the “Spin over the wrong shoulder twice,” and the “Whoops, my OTHER left.” Good times.

xdog
15 years ago

Despite McLouth’s September, the Braves gave him only 2 PAs in the Giants series.

gonfalon
15 years ago
Reply to  xdog

… which was more than the Giants gave Barry Zito in the postseason. (in fairness, Zito’s August performance was likely what made him a spectator in October.)

In all seriousness, I hope McLouth can put it back together well enough to remain in baseball after 2011, since there’s no chance the Braves will exercise his $10.65M option (and might not even try to re-sign him at any price).

spliffbowl
15 years ago
Reply to  gonfalon

It would be pretty silly to give Barry Zito PAs, when it was a given that he was not going to start any games for them.

gonfalon
15 years ago
Reply to  gonfalon

@ spliffbowl … the point was that the Braves actually let McLouth play during the playoffs, while the Giants did not let Zito play at all.

Undocorkscrew
15 years ago

Asking just one of Schafer or McLouth to return to form is probably too much, but how great would it be if they both did? Once Chipper goes down, that allows the Braves to slot Prado in at 3B, Schafer in at CF, with McLouth sliding over to LF where he’d be less of a defensive liability.

If both suck at the plate roughly the same, let Schafer be the starter in CF anyway. No sense in having McLouth kill them on offense and defense.

Merlin
15 years ago

McLouth’s arm is roughly the equivalent of mine; I’m 62 and have an arthritic shoulder. He frequently doesn’t even try to throw runners out so every hit that’s not right at him is a potential double so he has to hit a LOT better to make up for that. The first half of 2009 was good but career wise he’s always good the 1st half then tails off. I’m not a believer that he’s anything more than the 243/338/454 guy his career says he is. That’s okay for the Pirates, Royals, or other such teams trying to get to 500. It sux for teams trying to win a title.
Shafer is toast IMHO. He came into camp much lauded for his hard work and super fitness and is 182/217/273. I’ll give Uggla a bad spring. he always sux in the spring. Shafer had to perform and hasn’t which is why Matt Young and Wilken Ramirez look to be ahead of him on the depth chart.
Wren screwed the pooch by signing a worn out Rodrigo Lopez and the questionable arm of George Sherrill when he could have signed or traded for a stopgap guy to play center instead.

Undocorkscrew
15 years ago
Reply to  Merlin

“243/338/454”

Isn’t that roughly the league average for CF? The Braves made the playoffs with a line a lot worse than that from both Melky and McLouth, so I’d love to see McLouth bounce back with a line like that.

Lopez was a depth signing that poses very little risk. Sherrill will just be a LOOGY, he’s proven he can get lefties out on a consistent basis. Another low risk move, and there weren’t really any viable stop gaps available for CF.

Schafer isn’t toast because of a bad spring where he gets an occasional start after missing damn near 2 and a half years. If he under performs again this year in AAA, sure. The only thing his poor ST numbers mean is he won’t be breaking camp with the club. Don’t see Young doing it either….

AA
15 years ago

Anyone think the Braves should look at putting Heyward in CF, at least until Schaefer is ready, put McLouth in LF and Prado in RF?