NERD Game Scores for Tuesday, September 06, 2016

Devised originally in response to a challenge issued by sabermetric nobleman Rob Neyer, and expanded at the request of nobody, NERD scores represent an attempt to summarize in one number (and on a scale of 0-10) the likely aesthetic appeal or watchability, for the learned fan, of a player or team or game. Read more about the components of and formulae for NERD scores here.

***

Most Highly Rated Game
Toronto at New York AL | 19:05 ET
Sanchez (162.1 IP, 84 xFIP-) vs. Cessa (36.2 IP, 109 xFIP-)For much the same reason these same two teams were featured yesterday, they appear here again — largely owing, that is, to the considerable consequences of each of Toronto’s games right now. The author has expressed this previously in terms of the club’s probability of winning their division (51%) or qualifying for a wild-card spot (37%) or doing neither. At his site, The Baseball Gauge, Dan Hirsch provides another means by which to understand the same concept — namely, by championship leverage index (CLI). Just as leverage index measure the import of a particular moment in a game (where 1.0 is average and greater than 1.0 equals greater import), CLI measures the import of a game relative to a club’s chances of winning the World Series. The Blue Jays currently possess the league’s highest mark by this measure, a 2.31. Boston is second (2.28). And even Toronto’s opponent tonight, the Yankees, feature a slightly above-average figure (1.04).

Readers’ Preferred Broadcast: Toronto Radio.

Two Other Brief Notes
Today’s Free Game
Today’s free game features Detroit at Chicago AL, starts at 20:10 ET, and can be accessed by means of this hyperlinked text.

On NERD’s Playoff Adjustment, the Cubs, and the Rangers
As the season wears on, the algorithm for game NERD scores weights team scores progressively more heavily and pitcher scores less heavily — to account for the greater influence of a team’s posteason chances on the watchability of their games. Also as the season progresses, the algorithm for those team NERD scores weights various performance factors (weighted batting, adjusted home-run rate) less heavily and playoff odds more heavily.

The idea of the postseason adjustment is to assess higher NERD scores to clubs which feature less certainty regarding the postseason. To accomplish this, the author begins with the divisional odds and wild-card odds and finds the absolute value of each number minus 0.5 (or, 50%). I then add the results together divide by two. Then I subtract the result of that figure from 0.5 and multiply the resulting number by 20. Finally, I normalize all the scores to create a league average of 5.0.

Here’s all of that using the Chicago Cubs as an example. The Cubs have divisional and wild-card odds of 100.0% and 0.0%, respectively, using the site’s “coin flip” methodology (which seems to best represent how the human mind conceives of postseason odds).

  • [ |1.000 – 0.5| + |0.000 – 0.5| ] / 2 = 0.500
  • (0.5 – 0.500) * 20 = 0.0

That 0.0 number is the postseason adjustment just before it’s normalized to create a league average of 5.0. The raw league average right now is 1.74. So, to find the Cubs’ score we subtract that figure from 5.0 and add the difference to the Cubs’ raw score.

So:

  • 0.0 + (5.0 – 1.74) = 3.3

That 3.3 represents Chicago’s current playoff adjustment — a figure to which the team’s NERD score will gravitate continuously as the season continues. It’s also the lowest possible score a club can receive at the moment, one shared mostly by very poor clubs that have been effectively (or literally) eliminated from postseason contention. Because, like those clubs, the Cubs aren’t playing games of any great consequence at the moment. Playing in a division where it appears as though 86 wins would be sufficient to claim that division, the Cubs have already recorded 89 wins. Which, that means they could lose every game for the rest of the season and still probably win the Central. A similar principle applies to the Texas Rangers, as well: they’ve already won 82 games, while second-place Houston is projected for just 86 wins.

Complete Schedule
Here’s the complete and very sortable table for all of today’s games. Pitching probables and game times aggregated from MLB.com and also the rest of the internet. Note that calculations both for team and game NERD scores feature adjustment for postseason odds that increases as season progresses. Read more about those adjustments here and here.

NERD Scores for September 06, 2016
Away SP TM GM TM SP Home Time
Williams Perez ATL 4 3 4 4 5 WAS Gio Gonzalez 19:05
Luke Weaver STL 10 7 6 4 2 PIT Ryan Vogelsong 19:05
Aaron Sanchez TOR 8 10 7 4 9 NYA Luis Cessa 19:05
Yovani Gallardo BAL 0 8 5 4 5 TB Jake Odorizzi 19:10
Brad Peacock* HOU 5 5 5 5 8 CLE Corey Kluber 19:10
Rafael Montero* NYN 5 7 5 3 3 CIN Brandon Finnegan 19:10
Adam Morgan PHI 6 3 4 4 4 MIA Jose Urena 19:10
Jason Hammel CHN 5 4 4 3 5 MIL Wily Peralta 20:10
Matt Boyd DET 5 7 5 3 3 CHA Miguel Gonzalez 20:10
Dillon Gee KC 6 3 4 4 5 MIN Ervin Santana 20:10
Jeff Samardzija SF 5 9 7 4 8 COL Tyler Anderson 20:40
Ricky Nolasco LAA 5 3 4 3 6 OAK Zach Neal 22:05
Shelby Miller AZ 3 4 5 7 4 LAN Ross Stripling 22:10
Clay Buchholz BOS 1 10 5 3 0 SD Paul Clemens 22:10
Martin Perez TEX 4 3 5 4 10 SEA James Paxton 22:10
SP denotes pitcher NERD score.
TM denotes team score.
GM denotes overall game score.
Highlighted portion denotes game of the day.

* = Fewer than 10 IP, NERD at discretion of clueless author.





Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

Comments are closed.