Rangers Get a New Ace in Cole Hamels
A lot of pitchers are flashier than Cole Hamels, and every year, a few new guys pop up and post better seasons, only to disappear again into the night not long after. Hamels doesn’t throw 100 and his out-pitch is a change-up instead of a highlight-friendly breaking ball, but with his command of a full repertoire and remarkable consistency, Hamels has established himself as one of the game’s best pitchers.
After a decade in Philadelphia, Hamels now heads to Texas to try and help turn another team into a winner. After a long time on the trade block, Hamels will reportedly be shipped to the Rangers — along with lefty reliever Jake Diekman — for outfielder Nick Williams, catcher Jorge Alfaro, and pitchers Jake Thompson, Jerad Eickhoff, Alec Asher, and Matt Harrison, though the latter is in the deal for contract reasons rather than as a future asset.
The focus will likely be on the the package coming to Philadelphia, given all the words that have been written estimating what Hamels would command as a trade chip, but while the Phillies didn’t get Joey Gallo, Nomar Mazara, or Alex Gonzalez, the Rangers depth of prospects means that the Phillies still got real talent back even without demanding a team’s best young players. The three primary prospects in the deal were all ranked in the team’s top 10 by Kiley McDaniel this spring, with Alfaro and Thompson both grading out as 55 FV guys, and Williams at 50. Kiley has provided a thorough examination of the players going to Philadelphia. The bottom line, though: these are good prospects that the Rangers surrendered.
And when you’re giving up that much talent, you want to get back a premier pitcher. Hamels is that. Since 2006, among starters with at least 1,000 innings pitched, Hamels ranks 10th in ERA-, 12th in FIP-, and 7th in xFIP-. Over the last few years, some ridiculous young pitchers have made their debuts and might have even passed him by, but even in that shorter time frame, he still looks like a top-ten guy.
Longevity is also part of his attraction. Nothing predicts future injury like past injury, and Hamels has been healthy. Pitchers with good walk and zone rates — proxies for command and sound mechanics — have the best health outcomes. Heavy changeup pitchers have better outcomes than pitchers who depend on other pitches. Hamels is in the right place to be healthy for the next three-plus years left on his contract.
And longevity is important for the Rangers, as this trade is more about 2016 and 2017 than this year. The Rangers only have a 3% likelihood of making the playoffs this year, but next year they get back Yu Darvish and retain most of what has been a top-ten offense this year. They held on to Chi-Chi Gonzalez, Joey Gallo, Rougned Odor, and Jurickson Profar, all young players that could get better quickly.
Adding Hamels at the top makes this team better next year. Not only does the 31-year-old lefty own the changeup that gets the most raw whiffs in baseball, not only has he been adding velocity recently, but he has also firmed up his curve ball this year. That gives him three non-fastballs to turn to as he ages, in differing amounts. He’s also pitched in a park that closely resembles the park he’s going to in terms of power factors, so it’s not likely he was a creation of a good home situation.
And by getting the Phillies to take Matt Harrison in the deal, Hamels’ already reasonable contract becomes a downright bargain. While we don’t know the exact terms of the financial arrangements, the reports suggest that the Phillies are sending cash along with Hamels and Diekman, and taking on Harrison’s deal; if they weren’t covering all of Harrison’s remaining contract, the cash would be going the other direction, so it’s probably safe to say that the Phillies are off-setting something like $30 million of the remaining $67.5 million Hamels is due over the next three years. That makes the marginal cost increase only in the range of $43.5 million if they buy-out his 2019 option for $6 million: Hamels at three years and $43.5 million is an absurd value for the type of pitcher the Rangers should expect.
And that’s why the Rangers were willing to pay the price in prospects to get Hamels. With the Phillies paying down the financial cost and the Rangers able to keep their elite prospects and young major leaguers, getting a pitcher of this quality was simply too good a deal to pass up, even if they aren’t a traditional 2015 buyer. The ability to stay out of this winter’s free-agent market will let the team focus on their other issues, and if they can get some of their young talent to step up and fill some holes, Hamels may be back pitching in the postseason again in the not too distant future.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.
Mind answering a question? As a life-long student of the game and a massive Rangers fan, Why would a below .500 team buy a pitcher worth about ~3-5 wins. At best with Darvish coming back strong from TJ, this will get them to about 84-78.
That’s in the wild card mix, and it’s before any FA work.
But you just wrote that now the Rangers can “stay out of this winter’s free agent market”, Eno.
for pitchers, who generally don’t like signing in Texas, it seems
In other words, I agree with Kevin. Even if most everything goes right, premium Hamels still does no more than merely get them in the wild card mix.
Rangers should’ve kept stockpiling. If next season does find them pulling an Astros, there’ll always be someone available at that trade deadline.
And it isn’t about 2015, but 2016 and 2017.
They’ve got mammoth contracts on the books with Fielder,Choo, and Andrus. Even Hamilton is owed some money. Beltre could be leaving soon. Same with Darvish.
They decided to try to contend from 2015-2017 and attempt to restock the farm in the meantime instead of develop prospects and have them blocked by contracts.
It is also worth mentions…worst comes to worst and the Rangers deal him for a decent package.
You can land a couple top prospects or MLB players for a half year rental.
This.
If Darvish comes back to what he was pre-injury, Hamels could even be the ranger’s number 3 if their young pitching (Martinez, Gonzales, etc) develops. They also have Gallo, Profar if he ever gets healthy, and Odor.
They moved a lot of talent but they still have talent to work with. Not sure they top out at a wild card only for ’16-17 but the AL west is looking pretty competitive for the next few years.
Some fun dogfights coming out way.
And if Hamels is good (assuming he’d have to be good to reach 400+ IP in 2017-18) they’ll owe him just $18m more, so something like 4 years, $62m. Plus you might be underestimating the amount of cash the Phillies are sending as Harrison is owed $28.4m for the next two years. I would guess they are throwing in more than $1.6m.
I…I feel funny. Did Ruben Amaro just pull off a timely and reasonably lucrative trade?
That’s 2 this week!
Maybe in a couple years people will be talking about how a genius Amaro is…
Take out Harrison and it becomes a truly remarkable trade for Amaro. But this a funny one. The Rangers spend with the best and so do the Phillies, so Harrison couldn’t have mattered a ton for either. At the same time I assume both are gearing up for at least one or two costly free agents and that dead money would have been very much alive for the both teams this winter.
Was Harrison a way to make the Rangers look good, or the telling truth about the value of the prospects the Phils received?
13M is not negligible money even for high-payroll teams. I don’t know why you would think the Philies are gearing up for any costly free agents.
The fact that Harrison was involved should tell you that the money clearly did matter.
As much as people like to dis Amaro his trades in the past two years or so have actually been pretty good.
I don’t think so, no. Hamels at that level of subsidization should get more than three lower-half top 100 prospects (granting that Alfaro could end up a bit higher on some lists).
Given his own stated demands for an unsubsidized Hamels trade, this return is a bit light.
I suppose, operating under the theory that big money teams are big money because they maxed out the budget, 13M is not a negligible amount. However the spending patterns of either one of these teams seems to indicate 13M isn’t heart-stoppingly important either. The Hamilton deal, the current deal, as well as similar deals (Braves Padres, Braves Dbacks, Marlins anyone to take on a contract) from other less wealthy clubs indicate that 13M will not impose major restrictions on new signings or limit the ability to take on more payroll through trade. It’s not that 13M is not important or easily forgotten, it just doesn’t stop further spending.
As for the whole costly free agents thing, the Phils seemed to have gone with the “restructure” idea rather than “rebuild”. I got the impression they would spend this offseason. I may be wrong.
The “Hamilton deal” is worth less than $2 million/ year. Arte Moreno is paying the rest. So I’m not sure that helps your argument.
They must hate baez, a package of him, mckinney, contreras and edwards or underwood just has so much more upside to me. It feels like they played it safe and yet gambled on harrison eventually developing trade value in the coming years and eating his deal either way.
Wow I can’t believe the Phillies are going to hold on to Hamels up until the deadline, Amaro must be even dumber than I thought. If he knew what he was doing he would trade Cole before opening day for absolutely whatever the Red Sox are willing to give him. No way Amaro gets a better offer than the 7th-best Sox prospect in July, and that’s assuming Cole is even still good by then, which he probably won’t be. Just another disaster contract from the Phillies front office.
mcphail saved the day. but seriously they ate ~43 mil, how do you not get a good package?
they actually ate closer to 57 considering they paid him so far this year as well.
This is perfect, except I’m not sure there was a consensus among fangraphs commenters that Hamels was worth a top 7 Red Sox prospect.
Sure there was, there was a consensus that Hammels was worth a lot IF the Phillies ate enough of his salary.
Instead of eating half or so of his salary, they’re eating all of Matt Harrison’s salary. That’s still eating salary to get prospects.
This, believe it or not, looks like a win/win. The Rangers did the right thing in recognizing their window of opportunity over the next couple of years, especially with Darvish coming back next year.
The Phillies needed the kind of organizational depth they got here to build around the Franco/Nola/Crawford nucleus (though I would have liked to see them buy low on Profar). And there’s a slim chance that Harrison goes from being a salary dump to being a useful cog by the time the Phils are ready to contend again (as happened for the Red Sox when they took on Mike Lowell’s contract in the Josh Beckett deal).
This trade broke down so easily and made so much sense that I’m pretty sure that RAJr didn’t make it.
The best part of it is finding out that a 55 FV prospect is worth 25M in surplus. Assuming Harrison is broken (good assumption) you’re looking at one of the three prospects covering that 30M in remaining commitment.
After that, value hamels as a 4.5 win player being paid like a 3 Win player, and toss in the 10M and all the math works out for two 55s.
I’m just surprised there was no deadline tax or rando inflation.
It looks like the key to the deal was Alfaro.
Good outfielders and pitchers don’t grow on trees but good young catchers are prime catches for rebuilding teams.
Good on Amaro to basically pay for better prospects. That’s what they need to do.