Sanchez’s Triple

I hit the triple and I said, “They’re done.’

Jonathan Sanchez, from the Silicon Valley Mercury News

In game 162, playing against the division rival for the right to go the playoffs, it wasn’t Jonathan Sanchez’s job to hit. It was his job to pitch. Nobody would argue that Sanchez was transcendental on the mound, but he did what he had to do, throwing five shutout innings despite three hits and five walks. He certainly received some defensive help from some unlikely candidates in Pablo Sandoval and Juan Uribe.

Instead, it was Sanchez’s bat which became a story. In the bottom of the third inning, Sanchez hit a triple deep to right center field off young Padres starter Mat Latos. He would eventually score the first run of the game for the Giants, which would turn out to be enough as the bullpen managed to shut the door with four scoreless innings behind Sanchez.

The hit was the third most important play for the Giants on offense – behind the Freddy Sanchez RBI single which scored the pitching Sanchez and the Aubrey Huff RBI double which scored the second baseman Sanchez. Jonathan’s triple had a WPA of +0.083, which seems underwhelming. Somewhat surprisingly, accounting for his role as pitcher only increases the WPA of the at-bat to +.091 (according to calculations from the WPA Inquirer), but it is worth pointing out that Sanchez’s triple was only the 4th by a pitcher all season and only the 20th extra base hit of more than a double. There’s also something to be said for the fact that Sanchez set up the top of the lineup with a runner on third and nobody out – the better hitters at the top of the order aren’t accounted for in WPA.

Perhaps it was a bit much for Sanchez to claim that the Padres were “done” after that hit, but maybe he had so much confidence in the top of his order that he knew he would come around to score. As he indeed scored on the next plate appearance, the Giants win probability rose to 65.4%; by the end of the inning the Giants had a 74.5% win expectancy. Sanchez’s triple wasn’t even the most important play of the inning, much less the game – the two run scoring plays in the inning had WPAs above +.100. But the triple kick-started the rally which gave the Giants the lead, and it seems to represent the turning point of what was formerly a 0-0 tie.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

In the end, Sanchez was right: his triple and the ensuing runs buried the Padres. The most prominent threat to the Giants’ chances came immediately after Sanchez was pulled in the sixth inning. His replacement, Santiago Casilla, immediately induced a 5-4 double play from Yorvit Torrealba. The next inning, the Padres managed two baserunners, but Miguel Tejada struck out to end the inning. Those would be the last two baserunners stranded by a Padre in 2010, as Sergio Romo and Brian Wilson took down the Padres in order in the eighth and ninth innings, respectively.

Over 162 games, things tend to even out, but sometimes, it takes only one to decide a season, and in one game, anything can happen. Nobody would’ve guessed before the game that it would be Johnathan Sanchez who would ignite the rally to vault the Giants into the postseason. What happened on Sunday night was simply part of the magic of the game, and now that magic brings the Giants into October with a chance to win it all.





Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James
15 years ago

“There’s also something to be said for the fact that Sanchez set up the top of the lineup with a runner on third and nobody out” – There was 1 out

“As he indeed scored on the next plate appearance” – The next batter struck out

bro
15 years ago

” Nobody would argue that Sanchez was transcendental on them mound, but he did what he had to do, throwing five shutout innings despite three hits and five walks, and he certainly received some defensive help from some unlikely candidates in Pablo Sandoval and Juan Uribe.”

The first part of that sentence doesn’t make sense and the whole thing would fit better split into two sentences.

Adam D
15 years ago
Reply to  bro

Surely they mean “transcendent” rather than “transcendental”… unless they mean he wasn’t rational.

Mitchello
15 years ago
Reply to  Adam D

I was thinking the same thing.

Matt
15 years ago
Reply to  Adam D

tran·scen·den·tal

–adjective
1.
transcendent, surpassing, or superior.
2.
being beyond ordinary or common experience, thought, or belief; supernatural.

James
15 years ago
Reply to  bro

Wordsmithing and blogs are incongruous.

Matt
15 years ago

Sanchez is a good pitcher, and it may help him as a competitor, but he’s pretty full of hot air.

Jeffrey Gross
15 years ago

Syntax Error:

Sergio Romo and Brian Wilson took down the Giants in order in the eighth and ninth innings respectively.

should read

Sergio Romo and Brian Wilson took down the PADRES in order in the eighth and ninth innings respectively.

Andrew
15 years ago

Interesting that Hudson had a big hit for the Braves on Sunday too. A two out RBI single to prolong a rally. Gotta love National League baseball

spliff(TONE)
15 years ago

Bush league article. Get your facts straight and use a proofreader before posting next time, GUY.

joser
15 years ago
Reply to  spliff(TONE)

Some basic civility by commenters would be nice, too.

daniel
15 years ago

Juan Uribe might be or not be a lot of things but he is not unlikely to turn in a defensive gem.

i'm_freaky
15 years ago

been a big fan of Sanchez since he was in low A but he says(and thinks) the damnedest things….think next year is his breakout year though…

and for “Jack Moore”, try to get it together – they were already laughing at your work over on Mcc even before this post….

quincy0191
15 years ago
Reply to  i'm_freaky

3.07 ERA, 205 K’s? I’d say this was his breakout year; if he breaks out further he’ll be a Cy Young frontrunner.

hi
15 years ago
Reply to  quincy0191

His ERA’s better but he was essentially the same pitcher as last year by all other accounts.

i'm_freaky
15 years ago
Reply to  quincy0191

i think he can be Top 10-15 starter in the NL, no?

for “hi” (some reason the reply option isn’t there) – Sanchez’ BB/9 and K/9 haven’t changed much the last few years but his H/9 and OPP SLG have been dropping like a rock, to the point where he led all of MLB starters in OPP BAA this year and was around 15th in OPP SLG…and of course he was 4th in MLB in K/9….what does it mean – is he improving or is it all that BABIP luck or whatever they want to claim? i’m not an expert but seems like he’s getting better fast and next year when he gets in the occasional jam i think he’ll have enough confidence to go right at the hitters instead of nibbling like he still does now…

hi
15 years ago
Reply to  quincy0191

@ i’m_freaky

He _has_ seemed to be able to get out of jams significantly better than last year. Whether he has learned to pitch out of them or whether he just got lucky I don’t know (watching him, I did however get the sense that he was extremely lucky to get out of a lot of his jams relatively unscathed)… His BABIP is likely unsustainable and overall, I don’t think he improved from 2009 nearly as much as his ERA suggests.

Only way I could see him being a top pitcher is if he substantially lowers his BB rates and I don’t really see that happening.

(not an expert here either…)

joser
15 years ago

Perhaps it was a bit much for Sanchez to claim that the Padres were “done” after that hit, but maybe he had so much confidence in the top of his order that he knew he would come around to score.

Perhaps he meant it as “If even *I* can hit a triple off this pitcher on this day, the rest of the team shouldn’t have any problems, so the Padres are doomed.”

Yeah, probably not; more likely it was just a fillip of the excessive confidence that enable baseball players to reach the majors in the first place.

Ryan L
15 years ago

Would be interested in reading about the Giants’ Pen over the last 30-something innings with out giving up a run.

PaapFly
15 years ago

Some of you guys should be TA’ing for your high school english teachers, not proof reading baseball blogs and being condescending. Latos sporked the only spot in the entire strike zone where Sanchez can strike the ball with any purpose, that’s the best part. Bravo, Latos. Perhaps now he can complain – at home – more about the Giants’ midseason acquisitions and them not being the same team wire-to-wire, while his three and five hitters were trade pickups

jthomas
15 years ago

I wish the Silicon Valley Mercury News hadn’t misquoted Sanchez- or taken him out of context. This is the transcript I got from the interview video:

Great moments… are born from great opportunity. And that’s what you have here, tonight, boys. That’s what you’ve earned here tonight. One game. If we played ’em ten times, they might win nine. But not this game. Not tonight. Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can! Tonight, WE are the greatest hockey team in the world. You were born to be hockey players. Every one of you. And you were meant to be here tonight. This is your time. Their time is done. It’s over. I’m sick and tired of hearing about what a great hockey team the Soviets have. Screw ’em. This is your time. Now go out there and take it.