The AL Central From ’08 to ’09

by
December 18, 2009

Instead of going team by team this off season, I will review the divisions as a group. And whereas last year, I used a version of BaseRuns, with some modifications for strength of schedule and the like thrown in, to determine the ranking of teams’ true talent levels, this year I will use WAR as provided here on FanGraphs.

Part Three: The AL Central

The ranks last year were Chicago (6th), Cleveland (11th), Minnesota (15th), Detroit (19th) and Kansas City (24th). Overall, about an average division in 2008 which the actual won-loss records would indicate as well as the division total was just two games over .500. 2009 saw some upheaval as the leaders of 2008 fell off a cliff.

Thanks to a one game playoff, the Twins came ahead of the Tigers to advance into post season play. In WAR land, Minnesota and Detroit were also evenly matched. The Twins totaled 38.1 WAR, good for a tie for 11th place overall. The Tigers were right behind in 13th place with 37.8 WAR.

After those two though there was a sizable gap until the White Sox appeared at 33 WAR, in 19th place. Then in rapid succession came the Indians, 30 WAR and the Royals at 27 WAR, at 21st and 23th overall respectively.

The White Sox were actually one of the better pitching teams in 2009, with an almost flawless rotation and Matt Thornton and D.J. Carrasco providing great bullpen efforts. It was the position players that torpedoed their season. Second worst in all of baseball (the Royals were worst), only four players topped two wins (Paul Konerko, A.J. Pierzynski, Alexei Ramirez and Gordon Beckham) and none topped three. The fielding (-35.6 runs) was just as much of a culprit as the lousy hitting (-40.6 runs).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Here’s a summary of the ranks for the AL Central teams, with 2008 first.
CHW: 6, 19
CLE: 11, 21
MIN: 15, 11
DET: 19, 13
KCR: 24, 23





 

Matthew Carruth is a software engineer who has been fascinated with baseball statistics since age five. When not dissecting baseball, he is watching hockey or playing soccer.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spitball McPhee
15 years ago

goota love how 1/3 of the Royals WAR came from a single player…

1
PhD Brian
15 years ago
Reply to  Spitball McPhee

Actually Guillen, Bentacourt, and Jacobs had very negative WARs, so it depends on how you look at it.

0