The Fringe Five: Baseball’s Most Compelling Fringe Prospects
Fringe Five Scoreboards: 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013.
The Fringe Five is a weekly regular-season exercise, introduced a few years ago by the present author, wherein that same author utilizes regressed stats, scouting reports, and also his own fallible intuition to identify and/or continue monitoring the most compelling fringe prospects in all of baseball.
Central to the exercise, of course, is a definition of the word fringe, a term which possesses different connotations for different sorts of readers. For the purposes of the column this year, a fringe prospect (and therefore one eligible for inclusion among the Five) is any rookie-eligible player at High-A or above who (a) was omitted from the preseason prospect lists produced by Baseball America, Baseball Prospectus, MLB.com, John Sickels*, and (most importantly) lead prospect analyst Eric Longenhagen and also who (b) is currently absent from a major-league roster. Players appearing on a midseason list will also be excluded from eligibility.
*All 200 names!
In the final analysis, the basic idea is this: to recognize those prospects who are perhaps receiving less notoriety than their talents or performance might otherwise warrant.
Cameron Perkins, OF, Philadelphia (Profile)
Perkins appeared once among the Five last year and has been among the last players cut on multiple occasions since then. He has, at points, exhibited contact skills, power, and defensive promise — but rarely all three of them in concert. After roughly a month of games, though, he’s acquitted himself superlatively in each capacity. Consider: as a batter, he’s produced one of the top combinations of contact and power among qualifiers in the Triple-A International League.
| Name | Team | Age | PA | K% | ISO | zK% | zISO | zAVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rhys Hoskins | Phillies | 24 | 102 | 15.7% | .314 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 2 | Ruben Tejada | Yankees | 27 | 73 | 8.2% | .200 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| 3 | Cameron Perkins | Phillies | 26 | 88 | 13.6% | .237 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| 4 | Mike Marjama | Rays | 27 | 70 | 17.1% | .234 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| 5 | J.B. Shuck | Twins | 30 | 85 | 11.8% | .182 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| 6 | Paul Janish | Orioles | 34 | 75 | 12.0% | .183 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| 7 | Juan Perez | Reds | 25 | 92 | 18.5% | .241 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 8 | Dustin Fowler | Yankees | 22 | 103 | 18.4% | .240 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
| 9 | Jason Leblebijian | Blue Jays | 26 | 82 | 18.3% | .239 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
| 10 | Nicky Delmonico | White Sox | 24 | 107 | 12.1% | .175 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
The only two hitters who’ve bested Perkins by this measure are a first baseman (Hoskins) and major-league veteran (Tejada). One notes, also, that Perkins is the only player to record strikeout and ISO marks that are both a standard deviation better than average. The defensive returns are also positive. After occupying the corners almost exclusively as a younger professional, Perkins made roughly half his starts in center for Lehigh Valley last year. That trend has continued into 2017, and the methodologies used both by Baseball Prospectus and Clay Davenport suggest his center-field play is in the average range.
Michael Russell, 2B/SS, Tampa Bay (Profile)
When Russell appeared among the Five two weeks ago, he’d recorded strong offensive indicators but a slash line of just .154/.234/.308. In the fortnight since then, he’s continued to record strong offensive indicators. In this case, however, the product has been more representative of the process. Consider: over his most recent 34 plate appearances, Russell has posted a slash line of .281/.324/.500.
As noted in that earlier edition of the Five — and also within Eric Longenhagen’s Tampa Bay list, as part of which he was designated as Cistulli’s Guy — Russell features a very curious defensive profile. He basically split time last year between first base (41 starts) and shortstop (38), which positions represent opposite ends of the defensive spectrum. He’s occupied the more challenging area of that spectrum so far this season, making all but two of his appearances at either second, third, or short.
Max Schrock, 2B, Oakland (Profile)
Schrock recorded a slash line of just .205/.271/.205 over his first 11 games this year. Over second set of 11 games, however, he’s slashed a much more impressive .292/.333/.563. The difference is almost entirely a product of his batted-ball results.
Consider:
| Dates | G | PA | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/6 to 4/17 | 11 | 48 | 6.3% | 10.4% | .231 | .205 | .271 | .205 | 33 |
| 4/18 to 5/4 | 11 | 51 | 5.9% | 9.8% | .275 | .292 | .333 | .563 | 140 |
While Schrock has benefited from greater production on contact, his plate-discipline numbers (highlighted) over the two intervals are nearly identical. This is good because Schrock’s plate-discipline numbers are excellent — and inform a great deal of the present author’s considerable enthusiasm for Max Schrock.
Garrett Stubbs, C, Houston (Profile)
A senior sign out of USC, Stubbs was selected in the eighth round of the 2015 draft and received just a $100,000 bonus in a slot valued at $176,000. Whatever his virtues, power wasn’t considered to be among them. It wasn’t surprising, for example, that he recorded zero homers in his first season (roughly 150 plate appearances) of pro ball. He had, after all, hit only two of them in a four-year collegiate career.
What’s more surprising is how he hit 10 homers last year. Yes, the first six of those were tallied in the California League. Stubbs hit the latter four in the Double-A Texas League, however, which features a more subdued run environment. Stubbs has returned to the Texas League to begin this season and has already hit three homers — this, while striking out in fewer than 11% of his plate appearances.
Of course, with catchers there’s always the added difficulty of accounting for their contributions afield. A player doesn’t slide gently down the defensive spectrum from catcher; he crashes. Fortunately, both the reports and numbers are strong for Stubbs in this regard.
Jason Vosler, 3B, Chicago NL (Profile)
Vosler was designated as Cistulli’s Guy on Eric Longenhagen’s Cubs list this past offseason after receiving that same ominous distinction last year, as well. As a professional, he’s exhibited a skill set possessed by a number of the players who appear in this column: better-than-average contact ability, non-negligible power, and some capacity to provide defensive value.
Over the first month of his 2017 campaign, Vosler has continued producing his characteristically strong contact rates. He’s also recorded his typical marks at third base. As for the power, however, it has been something much better than “non-negligible.” After recording only three homers over 483 plate appearances last year while splitting time between High-A and Double-A, Vosler has already hit seven home runs in 2017. The result? The absolute highest isolated-power figure among qualified Double-A batters. Another result? Already a more optimistic Steamer projection.
Regard:
| Type | AVG | OBP | SLG | BABIP | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preseason | .230 | .283 | .335 | .274 | 65 |
| Rest of Season | .239 | .299 | .370 | .282 | 79 |
| Difference | +.009 | +.016 | +.035 | +.008 | +14 |
The Next Five
These are players on whom the author might potentially become fixated.
Beau Burrows, RHP, Detroit (High-A Florida State League)
Rhys Hoskins, 1B, Philadelphia (Triple-A International League)
Sherman Johnson, 2B/3B, Los Angeles AL (Triple-A Pacific Coast League)
Nicky Lopez, SS, Kansas City (High-A Carolina League)
Mike Tauchman, OF, Colorado (Triple-A Pacific Coast League)
Fringe Five Scoreboard
Here is the top-10 list of players who have appeared among either the Fringe Five (FF) or Next Five (NF) so far this season. For mostly arbitrary reasons, players are assessed three points for each week they’ve appeared among the Fringe Five; a single point, for each week among the Next Five.
| Name | Team | POS | FF | NF | PTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Max Schrock | Athletics | 2B | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 2 | Michael Russell | Rays | 2B/SS | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | Sherman Johnson | Angels | 2B/3B | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 4 | Cameron Perkins | Phillies | OF | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 5 | Ildemaro Vargas | D-backs | SS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 6 | Garrett Stubbs | Astros | C | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | Jason Vosler | Cubs | 3B | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 8 | Josh Morgan | Rangers | SS/C | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 9 | Matt Cooper | White Sox | RHP | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 10 | Nick Pivetta | Phillies | RHP | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 11 | Nicky Lopez | Royals | SS | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 12 | Nik Turley | Twins | LHP | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 13 | Seranthony Dominguez | Phillies | RHP | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.
Shrock’s FB% has gone up a lot this season. That a small sample or you think he’s going full-Donaldson?
If Max Schrock does and actually wins an MVP, Carson Cistulli gets to be a GM of whatever team he wants, right? I don’t know how it could end any other way.
Lamonte Wade. Hitting .282/.398/.451 with a 15.9% BB rate and 1.17 BB/K ratio. 23 years old at AA. Excellent plate discipline, below average power (for a corner OF). Seems like a perfect Fringe Prospect.
And he’s a Terp!
Burrows? Was a 1st rd pick, signed for over $2M and has been the Tigers #2 or 3 prospect. Hardly a fringe guy.
Is it that freakin hard to pick ten fringe prospects each week?? Patty Mazeika, leading the FSL in OPS, 8th rd pick. Boom.
#1 don’t be a dick
#2 “signed for over $2M” sounds like a thing that would disclude a person from this list
I co-sign re: don’t be a dick.
Burrows qualifies for the list given the criteria laid out in the introduction. Not on a top 100 or 200 list = fair game.
Also, don’t be a dick.
Please take your own advice, and I don’t recall anyone leaving you as the authority on douchiness. More importantly, these comments sections function well only when people DO NOT REFER TO THE POSTERS, but only the post contents.
I am well aware of the stated criteria. I am opining outside that rigid box however. Burrows is anything but a fringe prospect in almost any sense of the word (except the narrow one employed here).
Really disappointed you didn’t include the word ‘digit’ or somesuch in the Garrett Stubbs write-up
Garrett Stubbs may be the most underrated prospect by scouts and those who take their word to be the Gospel because of their zealous faith that a player who doesn’t look the part can’t play the part.
Stubbs at the plate and in the field has out played nearly all catching prospects, including players routinely mentioned as among the top 100 prospects in baseball, including Jorge Alfaro, Carson Kelly, Chance Cisco and Zach Collins. Stubbs’ on-field performance has been nearly as good as the top-ranked catching prospect, Francisco Mejia. Stubbs has show elite plate discipline, elite contact skills, strong defense, great athleticism and speed for a catcher and above average power for a catcher. He’s also moved rapidly up the Astros’ farm system and generally improved each step of the way.
His downfall? He’s skinny, and modern scouts still look for catchers who look stout, as if the extra heft will help their knees withstand the vigors of crouching and as if collisions at the plate were a greater threat to longevity than the gradual wear and tear of the position. Never mind that Hall of Fame catchers Micky Cochrane, Bill Dickey and Rick Ferrell were all slight of build compared to what scouts demand of catching prospect today.
That is no guarantee that Stubbs will succeed. There is some risk with any prospect. But when you see a player not listed in virtually any top-200 list and out-performing nearly every highly-ranked prospect ahead of him, it’s nice to know Carson’s methods helps to show how an over-looked talent might rise to the top.
Well said. I was going to write up a much less extensive version of this. If I was a GM and the Astros wanted to trade with me, Stubbs would be the guy I made sure I got (even if he wasn’t the ‘headliner’). Finding a catcher who is that good of an athlete, that good with defense, and that good on offense is nearly impossible.