The Multi-Year Relievers at Mid-Season

Handing out multi-year deals to relievers is a dicey proposition, but every year we see teams hand them out. This past offseason 10 teams handed out multi-year deals to 15 relief pitchers, totaling $160.5 million total and $54.7 million in 2011 salary. Yet to date they’ve produced just 3.9 WAR among them. Maybe WAR isn’t the best measure of relief pitchers, but the other stats don’t make the signings look much better. They have also combined for 162 shutdowns, but 71 meltdowns — or a meltdown every 6.5 games pitched. Here’s how they break down.

A few observations:

  • Randy Choate is absolutely killing it. Signed for the lowest salary, both in 2011 and total, of any multi-year reliever, he’s produced a half win above replacement despite pitching the fewest innings among the healthy crew. But the most important aspect of his game is his inherited runners scored percentage. Not only is it lowest among the healthy relievers, but he has inherited the most runners. True, he’s only facing a batter, maybe two, at a time, but he’s certainly making the most of those opportunities.
  • The Yankees have already paid Pedro Feliciano more this year than Choate will make in his two years with the Marlins. My colleague and RotoGraphs contributor Mike Axisa argued the case for the Yankees signing Choate this winter. We might yet see Choate in pinstripes: they have asked the Marlins about his availability.
  • Rafael Soriano is obviously the biggest bust of the group, though no one needs a chart to know that. There was little chance he’d live up to his $35 million contract (22% of the the $160.5 million total), but his injury makes it a near impossibility. His contract would have crippled a less financially sound team. Overall the Yankees paid $43 million for five years of two relievers, and have gotten just 15 mostly horrible innings so far.
  • Scott Downs pitched just three games in April, yet has recovered to be the most valuable reliever in this group. He might be tied with Crain in WAR, but Downs has done it in far fewer innings. He has also done a better job keeping his inherited runners at bay, something that doesn’t show up in his ERA-. Even more impressive: through his first 16.1 innings (18 G) he struck out just seven batters, or 3.9 per nine. In his next 16 appearances (13.1 IP) he has struck out 13, or just under a batter per ining.
  • Since a little break after getting shellacked against Toronto on May 16, Joaquin Benoit has thrown 19.1 innings and has struck out 20 while walking five, with a 1.40 ERA total (14 inherited runners, 3 scored). He’s still probably not worth that long-term investment, but it’s looking better than it did earlier in the season.
  • After the A’s signed Grant Balfour and Brian Fuentes, Dave Cameron asked why Billy Beane was buying relief pitchers. Fat lot of good it did him. Balfour has been OK, while Fuentes has been predictably mediocre. Maybe he can get a return on one or both of them at the deadline or during the offseason. But it likely wasn’t worth the financial outlay, or, in the case of Balfour, the forfeited draft pick.
  • The two former Twins relievers are having different experiences after signing similar contracts. Jesse Crain has good traditional numbers, but has allowed a few too many inherited runners to score on his watch. The six meltdowns are also a bit troubling. Then again, Matt Guerrier has been far worse in both categories.
  • As a group these 15 pitchers do a better than average job of holding inherited runners. The league rate is 29%, while they’re at 22.5%. Yet they’re melting down at a slightly above-average rate. The league melts down once every 6.8 games, while, as mentioned, this group melts down once every 6.5 games.

This group has plenty of time to recover for the second half, but at the same time they have plenty of time to falter, too. The performance as a whole might improve, as guys like Benoit put their slow starts further behind them, and guys like Soriano get healthy. But there are also opportunities for guys to go from good to bad, or from mediocre to bad. We see it so often with relief pitchers. It remains a wonder that general managers deem them fit for multi-year agreements.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Joe also writes about the Yankees at River Ave. Blues.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Trotter76
14 years ago

What’s the definition of a meltdown for the purposes of this article?

lex logan
14 years ago
Reply to  Trotter76

Good question — there was an article about shutdowns/meltdowns earlier this year, but there ought to be a definition in the Glossary. My memory is that these are based on changes in Win Probability, with a 6% swing qualifying as a Shutdown or Meltdown. I remember the article did not make it clear if that was an absolute difference or a proportional change.

Small Sample Goodness
14 years ago
Reply to  lex logan

There’s a whole section in the glossary dedicated to SD/MD.