Which Teams Have Suffered the Most From Injuries?

David Frerker and Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

Major League Baseball’s injured list is the sport’s unofficial 31st team, one that never makes the playoffs but always plays spoiler. In the last week, 22 players were placed on the IL. The biggest name was Will Smith, who late last week landed on the IL with a bone bruise on his hand, courtesy of a rather rude foul tip off the bat of Nick Gonzales.

The Dodgers aren’t known for having a great deal of injury luck, but as injuries go, Smith’s appears to be far less consequential than it could have been. Smith’s tests revealed no fracture, minimizing the amount of time he’s expected to miss. The 30-year-old catcher is having the best offensive season of his career, with a .296/.404/.497 slash line and a 153 wRC+, all except slugging percentage representing career bests. He has played in fewer games than usual, but that’s largely due to the team’s roster construction; he started 39 games at designated hitter in 2022-2023, but Shohei Ohtani’s presence now makes it far more difficult to sneak him into the lineup here when he has a day off of catching. The injury would be a big deal… if it were a big deal, but Smith could return as early as this upcoming weekend. It could have been even sooner, but Smith’s start last Tuesday after missing five games meant that the retroactive IL date was later than September 3, when the Gonzales foul tip occurred.

Smith and the Dodgers seem to have gotten lucky, but the Astros and Yordan Alvarez may not see the same fortune. Less than a month after returning from a broken hand that had cost him more than half of the 2025 season, Alvarez turned his ankle while touching home plate in an awkward fashion that is only appropriate on your Stretch Armstrong doll. He has not yet been placed on the IL, and the exact consequences are still to be determined, but it’s all but official that he is going to miss some time. We’ll know more after his MRI on Tuesday. A serious injury to Alvarez could imperil the Astros in their tight playoff race and beyond if they make it to October.

Alvarez has already spent 115 days on the IL this season, and the Astros have certainly felt his absence, but how do their losses this season compare to those of other teams this season? More broadly, which team has lost the most production to the injured list? If you ask the fans of an underperforming team, the near-unanimous answer will be “us,” but I think we can do better than that!

To get an answer for that, I took every IL stint in 2025 to estimate how much potential WAR loss there was due to the missed playing time for each injured player. It’s hard to give a precise answer in term of “injuries cost X team Y wins” because it requires a lot of alternate history, but we can at least get a general idea of how much baseball value disappeared into the aether. So please don’t quote these as actual wins lost or I will [A LEGALLY ALLOWED ACTIVITY UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW]. To make this as close as possible — and to give myself as much work as possible — I projected each player at the point of their final game before they landed on the IL. For the rest of the season, I counted players already confirmed out for the season or with no timetable for return on our injury chart as missing the rest of the year. For players currently on rehab assignment, I assigned them the earliest date they’re allowed to return, according to CBS Sports injury table. Adding in the nagging day-to-day injuries that didn’t result in an IL stint would be interesting, but also nearly impossible to execute, and by definition, those are all lower-impact ailments. Also, I cannot include injuries that have not yet happened, for reasons I hope are obvious.

2025 Team Potential Injury Loss (ZiPS)
Team Potential WAR Loss
Houston Astros 17.6
Baltimore Orioles 17.0
Los Angeles Dodgers 15.2
Boston Red Sox 14.4
Atlanta Braves 14.2
Arizona Diamondbacks 11.9
Toronto Blue Jays 11.3
New York Mets 11.2
San Diego Padres 10.5
Milwaukee Brewers 10.0
Tampa Bay Rays 9.8
Miami Marlins 9.6
Detroit Tigers 9.6
New York Yankees 9.6
Cincinnati Reds 9.1
Texas Rangers 8.8
Pittsburgh Pirates 8.7
Seattle Mariners 8.5
Kansas City Royals 7.9
Athletics 7.7
Chicago Cubs 7.3
Minnesota Twins 7.2
Cleveland Guardians 6.4
Chicago White Sox 6.4
Washington Nationals 6.4
Philadelphia Phillies 5.3
Colorado Rockies 5.2
Los Angeles Angels 4.8
St. Louis Cardinals 4.4
San Francisco Giants 4.3

If you forced me, at the threat of severe bodily harm, to guess without looking up which team lost the most value due to injury, I would have guessed the Dodgers, plus I probably would have commented that theirs is the type of horror story that would be just as scary as any premise for a Saw sequel. But it was Alvarez’s Astros, not the Dodgers, that came out as the team most harmed by injuries. ZiPS estimates Alvarez’s loss — which doesn’t include any possible missed time for his current injury, as he is not yet on the IL — as the biggest potential WAR loss in terms of impact (3.3 WAR), ahead of Reynaldo López for the Braves, Corbin Burnes for the Diamondbacks, Shane McClanahan for the Rays, Justin Steele for the Cubs, and Gerrit Cole for the Yankees. A half-dozen other Astros injuries from this season also project to cost the team at least a one win of value: Isaac Paredes, Ronel Blanco, Spencer Arrighetti, Cristian Javier, Lance McCullers Jr., and J.P. France.

The Orioles come up second using this methodology. This is good evidence that poor health should be considered at least a mitigating factor in their disappointing season. That said, it’s also not a get-out-of-jail-free card; the Orioles quite obviously knew going into last offseason that Kyle Bradish and Félix Bautista would miss huge chunks of 2025, and that Grayson Rodriguez was shut down for the last two months of 2024 due to injury. Barring a miracle, Baltimore will finish this season below .500, and injuries are far from the only explanation for the team’s underperformance.

Of course, we knew the Dodgers would rank highly on this list, just with the bronze medal instead of the top spot. Blake Snell was the biggest loss, but the team had, overall, slightly fewer star injuries than it did last year, and compared to the pitching staff, the lineup was actually quite healthy overall.

If the Red Sox end up missing the playoffs, injuries may arguably be the biggest deciding factor. If they don’t make the postseason, it’s unlikely to be by more than a game or two, and they’ve certainly missed out on more than a few wins in value to the IL. Some of those impactful players who hit the IL include Tanner Houck, Kutter Crawford, Triston Casas, Alex Bregman, Roman Anthony, and Marcelo Mayer. The Mets and Diamondbacks are fighting for the final NL Wild Card spot, and both teams have also suffered more-than-average injury losses in 2025. So have the Braves, but they’re so far back that they can’t reasonably cite injuries as their reason for not making the postseason.

On the flip side, the Zack Wheeler injury is a devastating loss for the Phillies, but its larger impact will be on their postseason and 2026 performance rather than on the 2025 season itself. (On Monday night, Philadelphia clinched the NL East title.) Some of baseball’s worst teams land at the bottom here (White Sox, Nationals, Rockies), in large part because they weren’t projected to have many wins to lose in the first place. The Cardinals need to have a hot finish to avoid finishing below .500 for the second time in three years, something they haven’t done since the 1990s, so the fact that they’ve struggled despite getting better-than-average health is not an auspicious sign for the state of their roster. No St. Louis injury stint in 2025 amounted to even a 1-WAR loss, with Iván Herrera’s injury coming closest at 0.94 (though ZiPS could be underrating him still).

Injuries will likely always be a big, unpleasant part of baseball, until flesh-and-blood humans are phased out for robots and cyborgs in… uh… 2020. Anyway, injuries aren’t going away, and the teams that best prepare to manage their impact tend to be the ones that overcome them.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
drplantwrenchMember since 2024
22 days ago

i get this is based on ZiPS, but i refuse to believe the angels, who have 14 guys on the IL right now and a team mostly of AAAers due to those injuries are the 3rd least impacted by injury

OkraMember since 2016
22 days ago
Reply to  drplantwrench

Apart from Trout and Neto, who on the Angels has both missed time and been an above average player?

drplantwrenchMember since 2024
22 days ago
Reply to  Okra

ben joyce is out for the season (lets not even bring up rendon)

jorge soler, logan o hoppe and travis d’arnaud, nolan schanuel,and now reid detmers

less important but also have tyler anderson, his replacement victor mederos and 4 other RP (chafin, fulmer, strickland, Zeferjahn)

angels home run leader jo adell missed a week due to vertigo (??)

yoan moncada missed bout 80 games due to injury

it all adds up to having otherwise out of work players in our starting lineup (Logan davidson, sebastian rivero, peraza, etc)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
22 days ago
Reply to  Okra

One of the first things I noticed on that table was how often it’s the better teams that lose more player value. Because they have more to lose! Losing Jorge Soler or Tyler Anderson doesn’t really hurt all that much.

drplantwrenchMember since 2024
22 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

i think the methodology is a bit of a double edged sword. would i rather lose tyler anderson and jorge soler or will smith? its certainly the former. but the angels have tyler anderson or uhh mitch farris as his replacement. and bryce teodosio and his noodle bat replacing jorge soler.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
22 days ago
Reply to  drplantwrench

I would rather lose Tyler Anderson and Jorge Soler and it’s not even close.

But I would really like to know what some of these projections look like. I’m guessing for most of them he’s either getting “zero” back as the projected value (or they haven’t lost much time, for example Tyler Anderson has pitched 136 innings). But this looks worse if you just picked year-to-date instead of projections. Logan O’Hoppe, Jorge Soler, Travis d’Arnaud, Ryan Zeferjahn, and Victor Mederos all have negative fWAR on the year.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
22 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It can hurt under the right conditions. You actually have to be able to replace players with replacement-level players, or your team can always get worse!

drplantwrenchMember since 2024
22 days ago

yes this is the point i was trying to make. id rather deal with an injury on the dodgers than deal with an injury on the angels, cuz we really have nothing under the surface going on

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
21 days ago
Reply to  drplantwrench

Dodgers are stars and scrubs too. Ben Rorvedt is replacing Smith. Enrique Hernandez is playing. Dustin May was in the rotation.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
21 days ago

Or you could replace your injured players with replacement level players and get better!

carterMember since 2020
21 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I remember seeing something that showed Ohtani would actually be more valuable to the Angels if he was forced to take up 2 roster spots, because their 26th man nearly always is sub replacement level. Of course it doesn’t work like that in actuality, but it’s a funny thought.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
21 days ago
Reply to  carter

By that logic he should have taken up 14 roster spots.

Shirtless George Brett
22 days ago
Reply to  drplantwrench

Yeah that seems like a bit of a flaw in this methodology. A fringey playoff team like KC losing a legit ace like Ragans for most of the year seems to be far more impactful than another team losing a handful of 1-2 WAR guys.

And thats without even getting into team depth which obviously means alot when coping with injuries (most teams who lose a Snell dont also have Yammamoto, Glasnow and Ohtani) or the knockon effect that are basically impossible to quantify (bullpen getting overused, not being able to carry a bench player because you need more pitchers etc).

Last edited 22 days ago by Shirtless George Brett
MorlandMember since 2020
22 days ago

Agreed. Teams with lower payrolls lack the quality reserves necessary to make up for the loss of a significant player and the Ragans injury is the perfect example.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
21 days ago
Reply to  Morland

Except for the Rays and Brewers who do have decent reserves

drplantwrenchMember since 2024
21 days ago

completely agree with this, though i’d only say its not necessarily a flaw, maybe more of a limitation. ZiPS is very good at a specific thing, but it doesn’t always capture the full story

david k
20 days ago

I was thinking the same thing about team depth, but also WHERE the depth was relative to the guys who got first. If you’re deep at SP and not deep at middle infield, for example, and your starting 2B and SS go down, that would be worse than if you lost two SPs.