Wily Peralta and the Case of the Missing Whiffs
The Milwaukee Brewers traded a mainstay of their rotation in Yovani Gallardo to the Texas Rangers last week, as you by now are well aware. When a team trades a mainstay of its rotation, it’s natural to look to the rest of the rotation in an attempt to find who will pick up the slack. Literally, that person will be Jimmy Nelson, who is likely to fill the now-open spot in the rotation. But Nelson’s a fifth starter who is 26 has thrown just 79 innings in the MLB, so the expectations of him are somewhat tempered.
You look to the rest of the rotation and you see Kyle Lohse and Matt Garza, two guys whose career trajectories appear to be going down rather than up. Mike Fiers is an interesting case, but believe it or not he’s only a year younger than Garza and since he hasn’t been a big part of the rotation the last two years, the bar isn’t set too high for him, either.
This brings us to Wily Peralta. Peralta is young — he’s just 25. Peralta has been a fixture of the rotation the last two seasons — he’s made 32 starts in each year and racked up 382 innings in the process. Peralta legitimately improved last season — he dropped his ERA-, FIP- and xFIP- while throwing more innings per start. And Peralta is exciting, because he throws really, really hard. But that’s the part I want to talk about.
He’s exciting because he throws really hard, but he’s also not-so-exciting because that speed doesn’t actually lead to any strikeouts. Here’s a table of starting pitchers, sorted by velocity next to K%. Peralta sticks out like a sore thumb, alongside Nathan Eovaldi, whom Eno wrote about here. Granted, Peralta saw a boost in his strikeouts last year, but so did most pitchers. Peralta was coming from Mark Buehrle strikeouts levels and he only improved to Aaron Harang levels, so that dims some of the shine of his boost. His 18.4% strikeout percentage and 8.5% swinging strike rate were still well below league average, which is a bit befuddling for a guy who can do this:
That’s a 98mph heater blown past Peralta’s now-teammate Adam Lind. Peralta’s fastball averaged 96.5mph last year, which was a top-10 mark in baseball and a full tick faster than what he averaged the year prior. But still, no whiffs.
A big fastball is one of the most easily recognizable and sought-after things in baseball. It’s simply intuition that velocity would be positively correlated with getting swinging strikes and ensuing strikeouts, but here’s a plot to back up that assertion anyway:
It’s clear that Peralta is unique in this regard. It’s clear that he’s got the stuff to be a strikeout pitcher, but isn’t. And it’s clear that if he is to become a dominant starting pitcher like the Brewers surely hope he will, that getting some strikeouts could go a long way. Though to be fair, that much is true for just about any pitcher.
So why aren’t the strikeouts there? Let’s investigate.
Peralta mainly throws three pitches: a fastball, a sinker and a slider. And perhaps that’s clue number one. Peralta’s fastball and sinker both went more than 96mph on average last season, and they accounted for two out of every three pitches Peralta threw. The third is a slider that goes 86mph, and while a 10mph differential is nice, hitters only have two speeds to worry about. They know they can sit on 96 the majority of the time, and they know they won’t ever see anything slower than 86. Peralta has experimented with a changeup, but he’s never thrown it slower than 84, so even that wouldn’t accomplish the goal of giving hitters a third speed to worry about.
I decided to investigate each of Peralta’s three pitches and their respective swinging strike rates to find the main culprit for his lack of strikeouts. These figures are represented in standard deviations above or below league average:
- Fastball: -0.7
- Sinker: +1.0
- Slider: +0.7
It’s the fastball. Peralta’s heater got whiffs on just 12% of its swings last year, which is a full percentage point lower than entirely-boring Colby Lewis. That seems odd. Pitch location can have a lot to do with whiff rates, so that seemed like the next logical place to look. I picked three pitchers with similar velocity to Peralta who get significantly higher swinging strike rates on their fastball in hopes that something would pop out. I generated heatmaps, via BaseballSavant, of their fastball location. And I stuck all four into one image, which looks literally exactly like this:
Again, Peralta is unique.
Danny Salazar, another three-pitch guy, works almost exclusively in the upper-third with his heater, leaving the bottom third for his splitter and slider. Jeff Samardzija is a five-pitch guy who also lives almost exclusively up in the zone with his four-seamer. Zack Wheeler throws four pitches, and while he tends to favor the outer edges of the plate with his fastball moreso than the upper-third, he still stays away from the bottom-third.
Peralta, on the other hand, lives mostly low in the zone with his four-seamer and often goes low-and-away to righties — counter-intuitive for someone with the velocity he possesses. Perhaps it’s an organizational thing? Only six teams had their starters pitch to more contact than the Brewers last year, so maybe the team just values weak contact over strikeouts.
If it’s ground balls the Brewers want from Peralta, it’s ground balls he’s getting. All three of his pitches are above-average at generating grounders, and he was just outside the top-1o in grounder rate among starters last year. Grounders are nice, but strikeouts are better –especially with what appears to be an average-at-best infield defense in Milwaukee. And it doesn’t take an extreme skillset to a be a pitch-to-contact guy. It does take an extreme skillset to be a strikeout guy, and by velocity, Peralta has a major part of that skillset.
I explored several different avenues in hopes that something obvious would pop out that could help explain why Peralta doesn’t miss any bats, but came up mostly empty. One more thing I did feel was worth sharing is this usage table from last year, via BrooksBaseball:
It’s a bit unique to see such extreme shifts in usage per situation. Peralta almost never throws his slider when he’s behind in the count, meaning hitters can just sit on 96. On the contrary, he really ramps up his slider usage when he gets ahead in the count and has two strikes, throwing it more than 40% of the time. Maybe game theory is in play here? We already made a point of Peralta only giving hitters two speeds to worry about, perhaps his usage amplifies that problem to some extent.
That’s all I’ve got. Wily Peralta, in some ways, is confounding. He owns what appears to be electric stuff that generates less-than-electric results. There isn’t one obvious thing that jumps out, to me, that explains his complete lack of whiffs given his velocity. It might have something to do with the fact that he doesn’t change speeds too often. It might have something to do with the fact that when he does change speeds, all he has is a slider that’s more average than it is great. It might have something to do with him throwing his fastball down in the zone so often, which might be an organizational thing. It might have something to do with predictable usage patterns. It might be (probably is) something else that I missed entirely.
Peralta made improvements across the board last year and turned into a pretty useful pitcher, so maybe this isn’t even something he wants to change. But on the surface, it feels like you should be able to see some strikeouts in Wily Peralta. We just haven’t seen them yet, and the surface is thick.
August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.




Nothing pithy or insightful to add, but I wanted to mention how much I enjoy your work. It’s interesting, logically structured, and fun to read. Thanks.
Also, Johnny Manziel sucks and that makes me sad.
Thank you! I really appreciate that
Interesting, and the fact that Peralta throws alot of low and away FB that don’t get swinging strikes reminds me of the “Effective Velocity” theory, or EV. Most hard throwers learn to live up and in with the hard stuff, and low and away with the soft stuff, which amplifies the EV difference. Doing the reverse evens it out. Maybe that’s part of Peralta’s problem too.
Working up in the zone with the fastball also allows you to change planes on the batter more effectively, he’s got two pitches with mild downward movement (sinker and slider) that he works down with, and one pitch with almost no downward movement (fastball) that he also works down with. That means on an eye-plane level, batters generally know what they’re dealing with. Looks to me like he needs to a) start working up in the zone more with the heat and b) develop a curve or a splitter.
Really like the Baseball Savant heat maps and would like to generate some for an article I’m working on. Haven’t really used the site before, could you give me a quick low-down on how to generate them?
If it helps, I’m looking for the fastball location for a pitcher in the years 2012, 2013, and 2014. If you know if there’s a way to combine the 2012 and 2014 seasons on one heatmap to compare to 2013 that would be even better.
Go to Pitch f/x search, here:
http://baseballsavant.com/pitchfx_search.php
Then type in the name of the player, the year, type of pitch, etc. and press the Search PITCHf/x button at the bottom of the page. Then, once the page loads with the player(s) at the bottom of the page, press the heatmap button on the far right side (it’s the colorful square with a dark outline)
Hope that helps!
Thanks, “someone.”
If you have any more questions Kyle, feel free to e-mail me at afagers1@kent.edu.
To my knowledge you can’t (yet) combine years on the site, like you want to do with 2012 + 2014.
Think I’ve got it thanks to someone, haha. Appreciate your help though.
Awesome, thanks.
Good article. Your theory about a possible Milwaukee organizational philosophy is intriguing and would make for another interesting article.
Yeah, I’d like to see the heatmaps for other Milwaukee pitchers to see if they also work disproportionately down in the zone.
How, exactly, does a graph with an R^2 below .1 back up any assertion of correlation?
Yeah, I thought about changing K% to swinging strike% where the r squared is much stronger. Obviously there are many other factors in determining strikeout rate but the two have a positive correlation, was the point.
Edit- FWIW, I changed the wording in the post to better capture what I was trying to say, so thank you for pointing this out
Well, a r^2 of 0.08 corresponds to a correlation of +/- 0.28, which is actually considered interesting in some areas (eg psychology). It is weak to be sure, but with a big enough sample size, it does indicate some relation.
Using the number in the graphic raises R to nearly 0.30.
My memory of correlation in a baseball context is that this is large enough to signify some importance to the factor (I’m recalling BP’s Billy Beane chapter relating offensive and pitching factors to success in going deep into the playoffs, that the correlations weren’t that strong yet were strong enough for them to declare them three main factors in going deep – or maybe my memory is foggy right now, battling a colad).
Also, there was a study on BaseballHQ.com that was published in their annual Baseball Forecaster book that found very little correlation between velocity and strikeouts, confirming what August showed here. Not that a guy with velocity don’t usually strike out more, but more that even for high velocities, you get a wide spread (i.e. distribution) of K-rates, both high and low. This wide spread can be seen in the above chart and would explain why R is so low, and yet R is clearly significant, because we all know that velocity is tied – somehow – to the ability to get strikeouts.
So who is getting 28 percent whiffs while throwing just over 92?
That’d be Mr. Madison Bumgarner
I don’t have any kind of sabermetric background, just watch the Brewers on a regular basis. It’s maddening that he doesn’t have a changeup. When he has problems locating his fastball, he’s really stuck with not much to work with. I’ve been under the impression with any kind of decent change he could vault himself into some kind of discussion of being a #1. I think the change is key to this conversation. Just what my eyes tell me.
I’m no expert (and I’m battling a cold) but perhaps Wily has what I’ve heard called “a straight fastball”? Movement on the ball (as well as deception, which apparently is driving both Madison Bumgarner’s as well as Yusmeiro Petit’s success in striking out batters at a high rate despite a lower velocity; say, August, where is Petit on your chart?) appears to be important for getting swinging strikes, perhaps some Brewer fans can speak to this topic.
Also, from my prior reading, “stuff” seems to refer to this movement on their ball, not the pitcher’s velocity, which August referenced above. Anyone else had this impression/definition?
And thanks for the nice article August, agreed with the above comment, I enjoyed reading this article. Look forward to catching your future articles.
“Wily has what I’ve heard called “a straight fastball”
This actually makes a lot sense. Now, when visualizing him pitch it does seem to not have much movement. Then, when I think of Fiers, because of release point he seems to “fool” hitters. Maybe Peralta’s release point makes it easy to see what he’s throwing.
I was thinking that too, although I haven’t watched much Peralta, I think this is really important for pitchers. The really bad news for Peralta if that’s the case is that I’m not convinced how learnable that is, my impression is that fastball movement is just sort of something a pitcher either does naturally and can’t even explain or doesn’t have. I’ve never heard of someone learning fastball movement.
I remember in little league my ball moved naturally right to left like a slider, then it straightened out when I was 13 and I couldn’t get it back, then by the time I was 14 and on into high school it was backing pretty heavily in onto the hands of righties. I sort of know intellectually that this has to be tied to the way my wrist pronated over those time periods, but I was never able to just decide which way my fastball would go in spite of that, and when I was 13 it was just flat.
Exactly, that’s what I’ve heard too, either you got it or you don’t. Just like you can’t teach high velocity, you also can’t teach a pitcher how to get fastball movement (though apparently losing a finger helps, there was a pitcher in the early 1900’s who was called Three Fingered something; not that I’m suggesting this :^).
He probably lives low in the zone because of who his catchers are. I bet Sullivan would have something to say about that.
Throwing 4 seamers down is a Brewers organizational thing. There was actually a fangraphs interview with the Brewers Director of player development.
>Early in their careers, we ask guys to throw strikes down. We don’t want them trying to throw to the corners. We want them to command their fastballs down in the zone and mostly, with very few exceptions, we don’t let them throw two-seamers. We want them to throw four-seamers with command. That makes them work on their command instead of trying to trick the hitter.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/qa-reid-nichols-milwaukee-brewers-director-of-player-development/
Also it’s been documented a billion times by now that Lucroy and Martin Maldonado are great at stealing strikes down in the zone, but apparently that’s not getting the K’s. Interestingly enough, one guy on the Brewers who does throw his 4 seamer up a bunch and also racks up a bunch of strikeouts is Mike Fiers who has one of the least impressive fastballs speed-wise in the league.
The Maldonado part is important to that too, because he’s kinda sorta Wilys personal catcher. He doesn’t catch every start, but they usually try to work Lucroys off days/first base days around Peralta starts