Woe Unto the Cleveland Guardians’ Bats

Ken Blaze-USA TODAY Sports

Intending no disrespect to the Minnesota Twins, a lovely team with plenty of commendable players, but the AL Central is a bit of a joke this year. I guess that’s not too surprising — the Central champion has either had or shared the lowest win total among the American League division winners every year since 2017. But as of this writing, the Twins are just one game over .500, a record that would put them in a battle for fourth place (at best) in four of the five other divisions in baseball; nevertheless Minnesota is securely in first place.

Maybe 30 Rock was right, everything is easier in the Midwest.

The foundations of the Twins’ easy run are legion. The Tigers tried to pivot out of their rebuild, tripped over the curb, and landed face-first on the blacktop. The White Sox are suffering the effects of Rick Hahn and Jerry Reinsdorf doing an aggro version of the hot dog guy meme. And the Royals leased their immortal soul for 99 years in exchange for that incredible run in 2014 and 2015.

But consider the Guardians. For most of the past decade, this has been Cleveland’s division to win. The blueprint has consisted of variations on the following theme: Use (in my opinion) the best pitching development pipeline in the sport to build an unhittable staff, and figure the offense out later. In 2016 and 2017, the offense was genuinely good. That was rewarded by a World Series run, and then a 102-win campaign that included a 20-game win streak. But since 2019 or so, Terry Francona’s club has had to settle for an offense that’s merely good enough.

A lot has gone wrong for Cleveland in 2023: Injuries and a series of mild disappointments on the pitching side have contributed to a sub-.500 record, but the real problem has been the total evaporation of Cleveland’s run production. After Monday’s games, the Guardians were 28th in the league in runs scored and dead last in wRC+.

There are bad offenses, and then there’s Worse Than Oakland:

Cleveland’s Offense Through the Years
Year wRC+ Rank Runs Rank K% Rank OBP Rank ISO Rank BsR Rank
2016 100 9th 777 5th 20.2 11th .329 8th .168 16th 15.8 5th
2017 105 3rd 818 6th 18.5 2nd .339 2nd .186 5th 11.1 5th
2018 106 7th 818 3rd 18.9 1st .332 6th .176 7th 13.7 2nd
2019 97 13th 769 T-15th 21.8 10th .323 15th .183 16th 4.3 11th
2020 90 20th 248 24th 23.0 13th .317 19th .144 26th -1.2 19th
2021 93 20th 717 18th 23.5 13th .303 27th .169 12th 7.4 9th
2022 99 16th 698 15th 18.2 1st .316 12th .129 28th 13.2 4th
2023 79 30th 212 28th 19.0 2nd .301 26th .116 30th 2.9 7th
Through June 5

Looking at Cleveland’s offensive numbers since the World Series run is a good reminder that the team’s offensive philosophy, such as it is, has been fluid. (Related: League ranks are subject to the surprisingly numerous twists and turns baseball has taken in the late 2010s — the DH, the juiced ball, the Astros’ banging scheme, etc.) The 2016 team slugged its way to a pennant thanks to some of the most aggressive platooning seen in the 21st century. Subsequent teams built a lineup mostly of first basemen. Others had “Let Francisco Lindor and José Ramírez Cook” as Plan A, and therefore had little use for a Plan B.

If there’s a consistent thread for Cleveland’s lineups during the team’s run of success, it’s in baserunning and controlling strikeouts. Power and OBP have come and gone, but since 2016, Cleveland has always done little things well. They put the ball in play a lot and make smart decisions on the bases. Even with a couple fairly big-ticket salaries on the books, Cleveland’s nine-man starting lineup makes a hair under $53.6 million this season. For comparison, Aaron Judge and Giancarlo Stanton alone make a combined $72 million. Cleveland can’t afford to make mistakes, or spurn opportunities for marginal gains.

Last season, that approach gave the Guardians basically a league-average offense, though when translated to a playoff context it was badly underpowered. This year, everything has gone wrong:

Cleveland’s wRC+ by Position
Position C 1B 2B SS 3B RF CF LF DH
Value 33 95 85 59 94 65 74 93 96
Rank 30th 22nd 21st 28th 17th 30th 27th 21st 22nd
Worse than 2022? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
Worse than OAK? Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes
Through June 5

The long and short of it is that the Guardians have a below-average wRC+, relative to both the league and other teams at the same position, at every defensive position. They’re dead last at more positions than they are in the top 20. The Guardians have backslid — enormously, in a few cases — at seven of nine positions. One exception is center field, where (mostly) Myles Straw has raised the team’s wRC+ from 67 to 74. Whoop-dee-frickin’-doo. The other is DH, where the Guardians hit .219/.266/.331 last year, for a wRC+ of 68. How is that even possible at DH? The Guardians could drag 52-year-old Jim Thome out of the cab of his combine harvester tomorrow, hand him a bat, and he’d drop better than a .600 OPS.

It’s fun to contemplate the implications of that chart. For instance, Cleveland gave the lion’s share of playing time at catcher in 2022 to Austin Hedges. He has his strengths, to be sure, but he slugged .248 last season. Tom Glavine slugged better than .248 four times in his career. So the Guardians cashiered Hedges, and then got worse offensively behind the plate.

Ordinarily, a team in playoff contention — and make no mistake, no matter how pitiable Cleveland’s offense may be, there the Guardians remain — would look at this pittance of offensive production as a blessing in disguise. The Guardians could improve offensively at catcher, or shortstop, or in right field, by doing literally anything. It’s very, very easy to upgrade on an offense like this.

The problem facing Cleveland is twofold. First, the Guardians are at their relative strongest at the soft end of the defensive spectrum. DH and the four corner positions represent four of Cleveland’s five best showings compared to the league. So if they go out and sign Luke Voit — and here, if I say “Luke Voit” you should understand I don’t mean literally Luke Voit, but rather some faceless slugger in the general mold of Luke Voit — it won’t actually help much.

Second, the Guardians are suffering severe underperformance from some of their most important players, players who are either well-entrenched due to their contract status or well-entrenched because they were expected to carry the load for their less offensively gifted teammates.

Or both. Steven Kwan’s wRC+ is down more than 30 points from last year. Ramírez remains Cleveland’s best hitter, but he’s having his worst offensive season (.261/.332/.436) since 2015. Andrés Giménez was one of the best hitting middle infielders in baseball in 2022 and earned a $100 million contract for his efforts. This year, he’s hitting .249/.311/.363. His double play partner, Amed Rosario, was a league-average hitter in 2022. In 2023, he’s hitting .224/.270/.314, and is 159th out of 162 qualified hitters in wRC+. And Josh Bell, brought in to provide the pop Cleveland had eschewed the past couple years, is slugging just .348.

And because the Guardians are run the way they are, they can’t afford to miss on any of these guys. Rosario, Bell, and Mike Zunino — combined -0.7 WAR this season — constitute nearly a third of Cleveland’s major league payroll between them. Financial considerations matter less in terms of midseason trades and waiver pickups than they do in the offseason, but a better-funded team would have built a more diversified offense.

Will this wretched offensive output sink Cleveland’s season? There, it’s useful to return to the original question. The Guardians have been able to skate by with limited offenses for four or five years now because the AL Central is the weakest division in the game. Even with the worst offense in baseball, the Guardians are still only one series out of first place. And it’s not like their offense can get any worse.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MikeSmember
10 months ago

You compare the offense to Oakland, but the A’s are merely a bad offensive club. 24th by wRC+, 27th by position player WAR, and 28th in runs scored. That’s bad, but it isn’t 33 – 129 bad, which is what they are on pace for. It is the A’s pitching staff that is really dragging them down. They have -4.0 fWAR through 63 games. Near as I can tell, no AL or NL pitching staff has ever put up a negative WAR total. The 1915 Philadelphia A’s are the worst I can find with 0.3 WAR and the 2006 Royals put up 0.5 WAR.

A bunch of non-MLB teams put up negative pitching WAR in short seasons and the 1890 Pittsburgh Burghers of the Players League accrued -2.3 WAR in 138 games, but nobody else comes close to this A’s pitching staff. They are on pace -10.3 WAR from their pitching staff. That’s worse than historically bad. It’s not even alt-historically bad as Rachel Phelps never dreamed she could field a staff that awful. It is unfathomably bad. It has no comp at all. For a full season, it is even worse than the -9.0 WAR for the 1925 New York Lincoln Giants of the Eastern Colored League, although they managed it in 49 games.

sadtrombonemember
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

Oakland had double-digit offensive production for the fifth time last night, which isn’t good, but the Guardians have only done that twice.

As it so happens, four of those five times Oakland hit double digits led to wins, which represent four of their thirteen wins. This should give you some sense of the offensive production that Oakland needs in order to win games, or you can look at the number of times they’ve given up double digit runs (a whopping eighteen times) to see where the major problem lies.

sadtrombonemember
10 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Here’s another way to look at it: The A’s are averaging giving up 6.75 runs per game. That’s lunacy.

Over 162 games, this would be 1,093 runs, which is more runs scored than the Colorado Rockies have ever given up in a single season despite them playing in Coors field with a pre-humidor ball during the steroid era (their worst is 1,028).

In fact, it would be the most runs a single team has ever given up since the team went to 162 games excepting the 1996 Detroit Tigers, which itself was the worst in a single season since the 1930 Phillies.

The A’s run prevention is so bad that James Kaprielian has a 7.21 ERA / 5.58 xERA / 5.78 FIP and he is still in the starting rotation. Luis Medina has a 8.19 ERA / 6.51 xERA / 7.33 FIP, and he is still in the starting rotation. and he’s still in the starting rotation. The reason is because they don’t have anyone better, and their priority was getting Kyle Muller (8.04 / 8.34 / 6.03) and Ken Waldichuk (7.22 / 6.07 / 6.95) and Shintaro Fujinami (11.57 / 6.46 / 6.01) out of there.

PC1970
10 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

& don’t look now, Oakland scored 7 runs in the 1st today!

Ivan_Grushenkomember
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

The 1915 A’s were also the result of a dismantlement, losing Eddie Collins, Frank Baker and Charles Bender. 99 wins in 1914 to 43 in 1915. The pattern was to repeat several times up to the present day.

Weirdly the starting pitchers were supposed to be the least terrible part of the 2023 A’s preseason. Where have you gone Ken Waldichuk?

Last edited 10 months ago by Ivan_Grushenko
PC1970
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

I’m not so sure they shouldn’t be compared to Detroit, who is scoring less runs than Cleveland is & is running out a really inept offense, esp with Riley Greene out.

Seems like most nights 3-5 of the hitters are hitting below .200 AND they have guys like Baez, Eric Haase, Miggy, etc that are over .200, but, have OPS under .600

Lanidrac
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

But fWAR for Pitching is a joke with it being based off of FIP.

The 1899 Cleveland Spiders put up -16.6 bWAR with their pitching. Then again, the 2023 A’s are on pace for -21.1 bWAR for their pitching.

MikeSmember
10 months ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

I understand why people like bWAR for pitching, but I prefer FIP based WAR because I don’t like penalizing pitchers for lousy defense. Those Spiders put up -99.7 dRAR. Incidentally, the same year the Boston Beaneaters managed 106.7 dRAR. Cleveland’s position players that year are credited with -14.5 WAR That’s a record unless you count the 1884 Milwaukee Brewers -15.4…IN 12 GAMES!

-99.7 dRAR is far from the worst defensive performance ever. The 2005 New York Yankees hit -160.9, “led” by Gary Sheffield (-34.1) and Bernie Williams (-30.2).

sadtrombonemember
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

I understand why people like bWAR. It’s mostly because they don’t understand that DRS is a real mess and that the defense adjustments overfit the data and don’t address the root confounding.

Personally I am waiting for an xERA based WAR—a bigger universe of outcomes but still defense independent.

Cool Lester Smoothmember
10 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, I honestly don’t think bWAR is useable at all, given that its defensive corrections don’t even account for different lineups, or for defensive replacements.

Best practice is fWAR for single seasons, and then FG’s RA9-WAR once you’ve got a large enough sample size to assess pitchers true talent levels in terms of BABIP and pitching from the stretch.

(Kershaw’s career BABIP isn’t any more “lucky” than Derek Jeter’s is)

Lanidrac
10 months ago

If bWAR for pitching isn’t usable, then fWAR for pitching is even less usable. bWAR is at the very least the superior model, relatively speaking.

Last edited 10 months ago by Lanidrac
Cool Lester Smoothmember
10 months ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

bWAR’s methodology is such crap that it tells us less than either pure RA9-WAR or fWAR.

If a team replaced Harrison Bader with a 50 year old Adam Dunn in CF at midseason, each start following that replacement would get a penalty for the half-season of Bader defense, and each start before the replacement would get credit for surviving Dunn’s defense.

Then there’s the fact that DRS inputs are clearly contradicted by Statcast data.

Lanidrac
10 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That would be nice, but for now basing WAR on FIP is clearly an EVEN BIGGER mess.

Last edited 10 months ago by Lanidrac
Lanidrac
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

Penalizing pitchers for lousy defense is MUCH preferable to not punishing or giving them credit for hard/soft contact on balls in play.

Cool Lester Smoothmember
10 months ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

As someone who finds fWAR absolutely useless to evaluate a significant sample size…rWAR is always useless, haha.

Until Tango designs a good WAR metric, use fWAR for small samples, use RA9-WAR for large samples, and use bWAR as an example of how shitty methodology can turn a bunch of useful data inputs into meaningless noise.

BarryZitoBarChords
10 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

Even though Oakland is merely bad on offense – and as other commenters below made clear other teams besides Cleveland are also worse than Oakland – I think the main point is that Oakland really isn’t even trying to field a legitimate MLB team and they have a better offense then Cleveland does. Therefore, with the pitching they already had in house, all Cleveland had to do was to be as successful as the A’s with their lineup and they would be in first place!