Xander and Hanley: Wunderkinds at 22

Hanley Ramirez is a good case study for Xander Bogaerts. The early-career personalities differ – Hanley was aloof and Xander is humble – but their profiles have a lot in common. Each came up through the Red Sox system with “Wunderkind” stamped on his forehead and nascent hitting knowledge under his helmet.

A notable difference is their rookie results. Ramirez captured NL rookie-of-the-year honors after being dealt to the Marlins. Bogaerts struggled to find his stroke and, relative to expectations, bombed in Boston. Before drawing too many conclusions, consider that Hanley was 22 at the time, a full year older than his counterpart was last season.

Contextually, Bogaerts was better as a 21-year-old than Ramirez. The youngster’s 2014 numbers weren’t enthusiastic — .240/.297/.362 with 12 home runs – but they came against big-league competition. At the same age, Hanley hit .271/.335/.385 with six home runs in the Double-A Eastern League.

Back when he was a Portland Sea Dog, the 31-year-old slugger had a rudimentary approach. “I like to stay through the middle and hit the ball at the pitcher’s head,” Ramirez told me in 2004. “I like to see what they throw and then react to their pitches.”

A few weeks ago in Fort Myers, I asked him what has changed since our decade old conversation.

“I know what I’m doing now,” responded Ramirez, who is back with his original organization after stints in Miami and Los Angeles. “Before, I just went up to the plate and hit. I tried to have an idea of what the pitcher wanted to do against me, but mostly I just saw it and hit it.”

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

After initially exaggerating that it took him 10 years to figure things out, Ramirez told me he was “a couple of years” into his MLB career before he gained a true understanding of his craft. Ramirez discovered the video room and learned he “could look at the pitcher, and also at my swing to see what I was doing wrong. From there I could go in the cage and work on it.”

The shortstop-turned-outfielder melded the mental and mechanical, and progressed to where he could “make my hands comfortable so I can get to the pitch I think he’s going to throw me. My legs, too. There are a lot of little things, and it takes time to learn them.”

Which brings us to Bogaerts.

The native of Aruba remains a work-in-progress as he enters his second full year in a Red Sox uniform. Bogaerts looks at a lot of video, but it takes more than studious film study to round out a learning curve. Addressing the nuances of his swing, he told me “the evidence can be tough to see, so I just come to the park every day and keep working, trying to figure it out.”

Bogaerts admitted his swing was often out of sync last season – “It’s not what I wanted, but the result was that way” – and the same issue crept up this spring. Becoming pull-happy has been the bugaboo. Bogaerts is at his best when he’s staying back and driving the ball to the opposite field gap, but he has a tendency to get too rotational and add length to his swing. At times he seems jumpy.

“It’s pretty weird,” said Bogaerts after a Grapefruit League contest. “Today I was thinking, ‘Let’s hit the ball to right field,’ and I ended up being out in front and pulling four or five balls down the line. I told myself. ‘Let the ball travel deep; don’t worry about getting jammed,’ and I broke two bats.’ It’s about getting your timing down and sometimes I just can’t control my body. It doesn’t agree with my mind.”

Much like a young Hanley, Xander is more of a neophyte than a knowledgeable hitter. He wants to discern the pitcher’s attack plan, but when push comes to shove, he looks fastball and reacts. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but until he locks into a comfort zone – until the jumpiness subsides and everything clicks – he’ll remain an unpolished gem (or, if you’re a skeptic, another over-hyped Red Sox prospect).

Projection systems aren’t particularly bullish on Bogaerts – Steamer has him at .260/.320/.416 – which is underachiever territory given his elite prospect status a year ago. But again, Ramirez didn’t heat up until he was 22, and Bogaerts – talented but still rough around the edges – is now 22. It doesn’t take a huge leap of faith to think he will break out this summer. Time will tell.





David Laurila grew up in Michigan's Upper Peninsula and now writes about baseball from his home in Cambridge, Mass. He authored the Prospectus Q&A series at Baseball Prospectus from December 2006-May 2011 before being claimed off waivers by FanGraphs. He can be followed on Twitter @DavidLaurilaQA.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
FenGraphs
10 years ago

Keep ’em coming.

Yirmiyahu
10 years ago
Reply to  FenGraphs

Speaking of the Fangraphs’ coverage of the Red Sox, I’m going to attempt to hijack the thread on the off-chance Mr. Laurila looks at the comments:

Care to explain your pick of Steven Wright for Rookie of the Year in the Fangraphs staff poll? I mean, beyond the fact that you’re a Sox fan and knuckleballers are cool.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  David Laurila

which of Wakefield’s seasons were rookie of the year calibre?

Yirmiyahu
10 years ago
Reply to  David Laurila

Thanks for the response. To be clear, my comment may have been a bit snarky, but I’m a fan of your work (going back to your interviews for SoxProspects).

Personally, I wish they’d have given Wright more of an opportunity at some point after they traded everyone last year. He was pitching great in AAA, they weren’t trying to win, and none of the other starters were earning their rotation spots. They’re never gonna have a more ideal opportunity to see if he can handle MLB hitters.

Yirmiyahu
10 years ago
Reply to  David Laurila

Damaso:

In 1992, he only pitched 13 games, but finished 3rd in RoY voting. In 1995 (his first full season), he placed 3rd in Cy Young voting.

ks
10 years ago
Reply to  David Laurila

Tim Wakefield finished with an ERA below 4.00 three times (100+ season innings) in his career. If Steve Wright is the second coming of Wakefield… I think I’ll take my chances as a hitter. No chance he wins ROY. Biases opinion to pick him. You may know the Sox system well because you work out of the Boston market, but that doesn’t mean other teams don’t have their own collection of B type prospects who don’t get the same hype as top prospects. ALA Jacob DeGrom.

everdiso
10 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

who was the guy that picked Hanley for MVP?