2013 Positional Power Rankings: Designated Hitter
Note: Due to an unfortunate data error, the numbers in this story did not include park factors upon publication. We have updated the data to include the park factors, and the data you see below is now correct. We apologize for the mistake.
For an explanation of this series, please read the introductory post. The data is a hybrid projection of the ZIPS and Steamer systems with playing time determined through depth charts created by our team of authors. The rankings are based on aggregate projected WAR for each team at a given position.
Update: Boy! What a difference park factors make! In the original iteration of this article — the one where we thought the park factors were park factoring, but they weren’t — the distribution of DH talent appeared skewed left. Now, not only have the teams shifted closer together, but teams from hitter-friendly parks — such as the Yankees and White Sox — have slunk to the rear while those in pitcher havens — the Mariners and Rays — have edged to more prominent slots.
Because I attempted to weave together these rankings into a grander sort of narrative, much of my original text requires revision. I am happy to report, however, the majority of my in-post complaining about the rankings became validated by the fixed park factors. However, in lieu of covering this article with strike-throughs, I am going to just update the test (as minimally as possible) to reflect the updated rankings.
Originalish post: These rankings are fun. They do not affect the results on the field or the players ranked in them or the GMs glowering over the players. But we are inexorably drawn to these sorts of rankings. With egos invested into our teams, rankings give us pre-season bragging rights or grinding axes.
In all this fun, however, it is important to remember the function of our list. As we are wont to do at FanGraphs, we have attempted to make our lists in the most clinical, mathematical and unbiased ways as possible. Whereas many MLB power rankings are based on gut judgements or broad, basic analyses, we have computed a scientific power ranking system that requires human input only when it is an improvement over an algorithm.
This means, however, the space between each team is discrete. The distance between No. 1 and No. 2 is much greater than, as you will see, between No. 13 and No. 14:
Two are clustered near the top, others are rounding errors apart, and two teams appear clustered near the bottom. But an ordinal ranking does not represent that accurately.
And even despite our best utilization of projection systems and playing time predictions, the season is unpredictable. Not just hard to predict, but unpredictable. If it weren’t, who would watch it? But as of now, as of our best playing time estimations, as of the best projection systems, this is how the DH world settles. This is how the big and sluggerish stand.
Without further ado, I present the Slow and Sluggering Show:
#1 Red Sox
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| David Ortiz | 455 | .286 | .382 | .534 | .386 | 23.2 | -2.1 | 0.0 | 2.6 |
| Jonny Gomes | 105 | .241 | .339 | .430 | .334 | 1.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Mike Napoli | 70 | .249 | .348 | .477 | .353 | 1.8 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Mike Carp | 35 | .243 | .316 | .402 | .311 | -0.3 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Daniel Nava | 35 | .249 | .340 | .384 | .319 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .271 | .367 | .498 | .367 | 25.6 | -2.3 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
It is hard to expect 600 or more plate appearances from David Ortiz. He will be 37 in the 2013 season and had an injury-clipped 2012 campaign, but all the same, his bat could not appear any younger. In 2011 at age 35, he seemingly reinvented his approach, cutting his strikeout rate beneath a 14% K-rate for the first time in his career. And then in 2012, through 383 PA, he mustered another sub-14% K-rate and struck out less than he walked for only the third time in his career.
When talking DH, the conversation is Ortiz and the field. His proven, steady productivity puts the Red Sox on a special tier. And if he struggles again with health, his backup should be Mike Napoli, who swings a bat of no little renown either, and Jonny Gomes, who abuses lefties and isn’t the worst against righties.
All told, it makes the best DH combo in the league, but by a small margin.
#2 Royals
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Billy Butler | 602 | .296 | .369 | .484 | .363 | 23.0 | -2.1 | 0.0 | 2.7 |
| Salvador Perez | 35 | .284 | .320 | .423 | .320 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Eric Hosmer | 35 | .274 | .342 | .441 | .337 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Jeff Francoeur | 28 | .257 | .310 | .410 | .307 | -0.2 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .293 | .363 | .476 | .358 | 23.5 | -2.2 | 0.0 | 2.8 |
The Royals rank No. 2 here, and here we also conclude our first cluster. Both Kansas City and the Red Sox feature enviable DH situations. On the merit of Billy “Country Breakfast” Butler’s durability, the Big KC earns a better projection than the otherwise impressive Rangers DH situation. Butler has averaged more than 670 PA during the last four seasons (and 600 PA as a DH over the last two seasons). Entering his physical peak (age-27 season), he should continue the same.
Butler had a filthy .373 OBP and .510 SLG, good for 140 wRC+ in 2012, but the duo of Steamer and ZiPS sees him regressing to a .369 OBP and .484 SLG. Behind the Great Morning Meal, the Royals do not have obvious DH types. The dropoff here could be much greater than in Texas, but it is nonetheless dandy to have a catcher in Salvador Perez who enters the season with a career 119 wRC+ and who could benefit from a few DH days to keep his catcher parts fresh. When Perez takes a spin at DH on days Butler is at first or taking a breather, the change in offense production should be neatly, though not perfectly, contained. The projection systems also forecast a solid season for Eric Hosmer, which could mitigate potential production losses if Butler succumbs to the unforeseen.
#3 Rangers
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Lance Berkman | 525 | .268 | .378 | .481 | .367 | 17.4 | -0.9 | 0.0 | 2.2 |
| Mike Olt | 70 | .244 | .327 | .424 | .325 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| A.J. Pierzynski | 21 | .274 | .315 | .429 | .319 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Geovany Soto | 21 | .234 | .320 | .418 | .319 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Ian Kinsler | 21 | .265 | .348 | .443 | .344 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Adrian Beltre | 21 | .296 | .340 | .515 | .362 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Nelson Cruz | 21 | .265 | .327 | .483 | .345 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .265 | .366 | .472 | .358 | 18.5 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 |
On pure hitting talent, I would take Lance Berkman over Billy Butler (career 146 wRC+ versus 121 wRC+). But Berkman is aged, post-injured, and on the aging slope’s slippery side. He also will be paying the DH penalty for the first time since his abbreviated Yankees tenure (where he posted a 91 wRC+ through 123 PA). He clobbered expectations in 2011 with the second-best offensive season of his career (163 wRC+), but projecting him for beyond 500 PA in 2013 requires uncommon faith in his 37-year-old frame.
A.J. Pierzynski, Geovany Soto, Ian Kinsler, Adrian Beltre and Nelson Cruz can and will probably log some DH plate appearances for Texas, but the surest bet behind the freshly-rehabbed, not-young Berkman is fresh and young corner infielder Michael Olt, who should offer, if nothing else, some power. If Texas is feeling frisky, they might summon Jurickson Profar and play Musical DH in an eventual Berkman absence. Either way, the Rangers have a wealth of options that, despite even Berkman’s question-mark-shaped health, puts them in the no man’s land between the top tier and the rounding-error cluster.
#4 Angels
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Mark Trumbo | 350 | .261 | .312 | .476 | .335 | 7.1 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Albert Pujols | 105 | .293 | .373 | .539 | .378 | 5.8 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Vernon Wells | 105 | .248 | .297 | .439 | .316 | 0.6 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Hank Conger | 70 | .250 | .313 | .383 | .302 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Josh Hamilton | 35 | .273 | .340 | .494 | .351 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Chris Iannetta | 35 | .226 | .338 | .388 | .319 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .262 | .322 | .467 | .335 | 14.4 | -0.6 | 0.0 | 2.1 |
“What’s wrong with the Angels?” you ask. I don’t know. I like the Angels. I like Mark Trumbo. In fact, I fully expect Trumbo to manage a wOBA above .345 in his age-27 season. I would not be surprised to see a .325 OBP or higher. I would rank the Angels higher.
But, here’s the deal: I am not an emotionless projection system, hardened into calculated wisdom. I’m a fickle, emotional human thing. I like Trumbo, you might too, but Steamer and ZiPS agree: He’s a touch better than Adam Lind.
And since he possess defensive flexibility (flexibility without acumen, albeit), he will likely spell Albert Pujols, Vernon Wells, and few others. Ceding DH plate appearances to Pujols? Sure. Cool. It only helps. Ceding PAs to Vernon Wells? Not so cool. The net result? Let’s just say: The opportunity cost of rostering Vernon Wells increases; it edges skyward like bubbling Kilauea, biding time, collecting paychecks, steadily not playing great baseball — I’m talking about Vernon Wells, but some of this might apply to Kilauea too. Never been.
#5 Tigers
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Victor Martinez | 525 | .289 | .351 | .442 | .340 | 9.6 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Andy Dirks | 70 | .274 | .324 | .421 | .322 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Prince Fielder | 35 | .288 | .404 | .512 | .386 | 1.9 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Miguel Cabrera | 35 | .317 | .403 | .568 | .405 | 2.5 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Torii Hunter | 35 | .279 | .342 | .433 | .335 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .288 | .353 | .449 | .344 | 14.8 | -1.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
The Detroit Tigers have perhaps the most curious DH conundrum. Their ranking, like most any other rankings here, relates directly with the hitter on the top of the depth chart; but unlike the other DH groups, the less of Victor Martinez, the better this group does. Martinez, coming off an entirely lost 2012 campaign, will be 34 in 2013. His offensive projections are solid, if not great.
But his backups? Pitch Killers and Twirl Torturers. Prince Fielder and Miguel Cabrera, the most likely to pick up the slack from an injured Martinez, only improve the projected offense for the Tigers DH position. Andy Dirks will probably get some playing time here too, which does not add much in the way thrilling offense, but a long-term injury to Martinez might result in more Fielder and Cabrera.
Without Martinez, the Tigers are a worse team. Nobody in Michigan wants a Martinez injury. But with less Martinez, the DH production improves as playing time cedes to a pair of other-worldly hitters. If Fielders gets 100 or 200 PA here, the Tigers DH slot pushes for No. 4 or No. 3 in this power ranking. Such is the nature of rankings, I guess.
#6 Blue Jays
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Adam Lind | 420 | .262 | .321 | .449 | .329 | 4.5 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Edwin Encarnacion | 70 | .269 | .359 | .498 | .364 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Melky Cabrera | 70 | .290 | .342 | .446 | .337 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Rajai Davis | 70 | .259 | .308 | .369 | .295 | -1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Jose Bautista | 70 | .266 | .393 | .545 | .396 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Total | 700 | .265 | .333 | .454 | .337 | 11.6 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 1.8 |
Adam Lind is not what we think when we think, “Sixth best DH in the league,” and there’s a reason for that: He’s not the 6th best DH in the league. But since he has no business hitting against lefties, and since Jose Bautista and Edwin Encarnacion have a multi-million dollar, international, blue-power-suit-wearing business hitting lefties, and since the latter two cannot — by Canadian law — rest against left-handed starting pitchers (especially given the lefty-soaked rotations of the AL East), these gentlemen — Mr. Bautista and Mr. Encarnacion — will elevate the otherwise uninspiring, Lind-led Blue Jays DH position.
Add to this potent duo: Melky Cabrera, upon whom shine the projection systems (oblivious in their digital, cold magnanimity to the implications, the possibilities, the doubts of a failed PED test). Can Melky, entering only his age-28 season, sustain his new BABIP level, begun in 2011, begun before The Failed Tests?
Questions like these and names like “Lind,” help illustrate why, despite ranking just two spots beneath the Rangers, the Blue Jays at No. 6 are further down the list than ordinal ranking suggests.
#7 Mariners
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Kendrys Morales | 525 | .263 | .323 | .455 | .333 | 11.5 | -2.1 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Jesus Montero | 140 | .265 | .318 | .426 | .319 | 1.4 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Raul Ibanez | 35 | .241 | .304 | .400 | .301 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .262 | .321 | .446 | .329 | 12.7 | -2.4 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
Kendrys Morales has been a switch hitter in name only throughout his career. Against southpaws, he owns an 84 wRC+, but we would be remiss to note that’s just 392 PA — with a .266 BABIP, which may or may not mean anything. Moreover, his minor league splits never seemed particularly one-sided.
Either way, Morales, Jesus Montero and tumbleweed Raul Ibanez will split the DH role (as Morales will get some playing time at first). ZiPS (.308 wOBA) is the most pessimistic about Montero, but Steamer (.326 wOBA) and the others (all above .333 wOBA) predict a better sophomore campaign for the 23-year-old catcher.
The net result should be about the same as any other team from No. 6 all the way down to No. 12. This whole middle tier is a week of hot or cold BABIP apart. As far as upside goes, though, I would take the Mariners and Morales/Montero over at least the Yankees and Rays DH situations (well, nevermind).
#8 Rays
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Luke Scott | 420 | .239 | .313 | .436 | .321 | 4.2 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Evan Longoria | 140 | .270 | .366 | .508 | .370 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 |
| Shelley Duncan | 105 | .226 | .312 | .400 | .311 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Stephen Vogt | 35 | .243 | .293 | .378 | .293 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .243 | .323 | .442 | .328 | 11.0 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
Do not let the nearness to superiority of the Yankees fool you: The Rays DH situation is almost certainly worse than the Bombers’. Tampa Bay’s own Injury Gravity Machine never hit like New York’s, and he has already struggled with Spring Training injuries. The Rays, however, do have a better Injured Third Baseman situation. Evan Longoria is healthy and ready to start the season. He figures to get some DH playing time as the team limits Luke Scott’s exposure against lefties and limits Longoria’s innings the field. The Rays have a plethora of infielders who can allow Longo to shift to DH with little lost defensively (and offensively, when Ryan Roberts or Sean Rodriguez replace Scott against lefties).
But if the Rays opt to just fully rest Longoria rather than DH him throughout the season (and who would fault them in preserving their Great Investment?), then Scott’s replacement becomes Shelley Duncan (whom the Rays have given a heavier bat; maybe that means something?) and/or Chris Gimenez (who has not been terrible against lefties in his career; maybe that means something?). The team also likes lefties Stephen Vogt and Leslie Anderson, the latter having impressed in Spring Training, but these are risky options with a capital, bold, 32-point font “R.”
#9 Astros
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Carlos Pena | 455 | .212 | .340 | .419 | .331 | 6.6 | -1.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Chris Carter | 175 | .242 | .330 | .463 | .341 | 3.9 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Nate Freiman | 70 | .245 | .301 | .393 | .301 | -0.7 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .223 | .334 | .427 | .331 | 9.8 | -1.4 | 0.0 | 1.5 |
Tropicana Field discourages left-handed HR power. Carlos Pena’s new orange juice home, Minute Maid Park, encourages home runs for lefties. Pena, however, has never been primarily a DH and the transition might, should hurt his numbers. If the Astros swap him and Brett Wallace to keep each a little more fresh, maybe the DH penalty dulls a bit, but DH production likely slips as Wallace’s offense is not quite Pena’s. At least not yet.
Pena enters the 2013 season hoping to rebound from a career-worst, sub-Mendoza, sub-100-wRC+, sub-acceptable offensive season. Steamer and ZiPS expect a rebound from Pena, but at age-35, the slugging first baseman may receive his final regular plate appearances as a member of the Astros — however long that tenure will last.
Chris Carter in left field will likely supply the NotGraphs crew with new, voluptuous GIF opportunities. It makes sense he will thereby get playing time at DH, especially seeing as how Pena never hit lefties well. Nate Freiman, also a righty, is a Rule 5 draft pick who could conceivably turn a few heads with his low-strikeout, high-power approach, but rookies who never reached Triple-A are a tough sell for ZiPS and Steamer.
Considering the Astros front office had to build a DH group from scratch, the team has done quite well for themselves.
#10 Athletics
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Seth Smith | 350 | .245 | .330 | .419 | .323 | 3.2 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Josh Reddick | 140 | .242 | .304 | .437 | .316 | 0.6 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Yoenis Cespedes | 140 | .278 | .345 | .466 | .349 | 4.2 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Jed Lowrie | 70 | .250 | .330 | .418 | .325 | 0.8 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .252 | .328 | .432 | .327 | 8.7 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 |
Seth Smith will platoon at DH and should fare well, better, perhaps, than the projection systems anticipate. And count me among those (Bill James, Oliver, and fan projections included) who anticipate Josh Reddick’s OBP, BABIP, and, therefore, wOBA to improve in 2013 (though perhaps not to the degree of those more optimistic projection systems).
Yoenis Cespedes, 27, and Reddick, 26, are both young and entering their second full seasons as starters. Smith, 30, is more weathered, but altogether this DH/OF trio is young, exciting, and better positioned than, though mathematically inferior to, more than one of the teams ranked above of them.
#11 Indians
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Mark Reynolds | 490 | .219 | .330 | .435 | .332 | 8.4 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Jason Giambi | 175 | .214 | .328 | .365 | .307 | -0.5 | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Carlos Santana | 35 | .249 | .367 | .442 | .350 | 1.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .219 | .331 | .418 | .327 | 9.0 | -1.5 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
Mark Reynolds dropped under 30 home runs in 2012, the first his totals dipped that far since 2008, and his offense as a whole slouched from his previous season’s production. Renyolds posted his first sub-30% strikeout rate, but it came with only a .335 wOBA. Our hybrid projections have him doing little different in 2013.
The Indians also signed roaming late-career ghost-of-a-bat Jason Giambi. I would like to imagine Giambi’s bat would offer more than just a .307 wOBA, but considering he has only one season above 100 wRC+ over the last four years, I must accept this is quite possibly the final stop for the nostalgic slugger.
#12 White Sox
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Adam Dunn | 595 | .209 | .337 | .440 | .337 | 7.2 | -1.8 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
| Dayan Viciedo | 70 | .266 | .319 | .446 | .329 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Paul Konerko | 35 | .281 | .362 | .481 | .359 | 1.1 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .219 | .337 | .443 | .337 | 8.6 | -2.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
Again, in the White Sox, we have a DH position that I — in my fiery, beating heart — prefer in real life, but in the Projection Systems Life, we must confront Dunn’s increasing strikeout rate, decreasing OBP — his startling 2011 season, his underwhelming 2012 bounce-back (an un-Dunnian 114 wRC+) — the ticking clock of Dunn’s career, the tick tock.
Dunn is 33 with a skillset that ages poorly, and his most likely backup — defensive liability Dayan Viciedo — has yet to prove himself against righties. This is not a bad DH situation for the White Sox, but it is not above the DH crowd.
#13 Yankees
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Travis Hafner | 385 | .254 | .349 | .445 | .343 | 7.4 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Brennan Boesch | 210 | .257 | .313 | .413 | .313 | -0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Juan Rivera | 70 | .254 | .310 | .403 | .307 | -0.6 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 35 | .254 | .338 | .421 | .331 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .255 | .334 | .429 | .330 | 6.2 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
The Yankees are entering an unlit future, this 2013 season. Every player on the roster is injured, like, twice, and the only healthy person — he’s not healthy — is Travis Hafner — he’s probably been injured by time of publication. The Pronk Fella has not crossed above the 500 PA mark since 2007 — George W. Bush was president; Michael Jackson was alive; it was different era, that 661 PA year.
Despite the steady unhealthiness, Pronkfner can hit. And in New York, he will probably receive a courtesy home run per game (his home, left-handed HR park factor improves 16 points, or about a 32% increase in raw home run likelihood, by joining the Yankees). Behind him, the Yankees will likely roll the dice with recently-acquired Brennan Boesch*. There are worse gambles, but gamble it is nonetheless. And in case of emergency, the Yankees can pour a little Quad-A into the DH cistern. Juan Rivera or Dan Johnson can enter the equation, hit a fastball 10,000 miles, and then record 20 consecutive outs against breaking pitches. Everyone has a talent.
* Since the original publication, the Yankees have revealed intentions to play La Shortstop here, that Derek Jeter guy, but since his projections (.316 wOBA) differ little from Boesch’s (.313 wOBA), forgive me for leaving this lone historical artifact here.
Meanwhile, Alex Rodriguez, if he ever plays for the Yankees again, will probably smack of a few homers, but only as many as a possible late-season cameo will allow.
#14 Twins
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Ryan Doumit | 455 | .260 | .319 | .414 | .314 | 0.0 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Justin Morneau | 175 | .265 | .342 | .447 | .337 | 3.2 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Chris Parmelee | 70 | .255 | .332 | .407 | .321 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .260 | .326 | .421 | .321 | 3.6 | -1.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
Ryan Doumit has a career .336 wOBA and 106 wRC+. In 2012, catchers — Doumit is sort of a catcher — averaged .312 wOBA and 95 wRC+. Over the last decade, catchers have around a 90 wRC+. For a catcher (or, a “catcher”), Ryan Doumit hits well.
Designated hitters had a .339 wOBA and 114 wRC+ in 2012. They tend to average a bit over 110 wRC+. If Doumit hits to his career numbers, hey!, that’s not bad DH production. In fact, sure, it’s fine, whatever. If he slumps into his less-glowing ZiPS and Steamer projection numbers? Well, as the No. 14 ranking suggests, that’s the good enough for this bottom tier.
If Justin Morneau can have another healthy season, albeit split between first and here at DH, the Twins will profit from it. But given Morneau’s .330 wOBA in 2012, maybe the best of Morneau has already been concussed away, which is a bummer for the Twins and for baseball.
#15 Orioles
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
| Wilson Betemit | 525 | .248 | .320 | .423 | .321 | 0.8 | -1.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Nolan Reimold | 140 | .250 | .330 | .430 | .329 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Chris Davis | 35 | .259 | .317 | .473 | .336 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .249 | .322 | .427 | .323 | 2.4 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
In 2006, Wilson Betemit had 412 PA and hit .336 wOBA and 100 wRC+ with the Braves and Dodgers. That was the most faith any team — or, in this case, two teams — put in Wilson Betemit. The next-most playing time he ever received was with the 2012 Orioles. He got 376 PA and posted a .324 wOBA and 101 wRC+.
Our best guess has Buck Showalter playing Betemit enough to cross the 500 PA milestone for the first time, albeit against righties only. Could this more-steady playing time help him find a rhythm above his career .336 wOBA and 105 wRC+? Maybe, but few projection systems like age-31 Betemit, and they like injury-torn Nolan Reimold — the logical choice for Betemit’s platoon partner — only slightly more.
NOTE: Some have protested the Betemit playing time, and rightfully so. But since our projections have Chris Davis getting ~600 PA at first base, it leaves little flexibility to put him here at DH. This is our best, cumulative guess: Betemit in a platoon, getting regular platoon playing time. As happens, we may be wrong.
ALSO NOTE: Fielding numbers did not factor into the designated hitter WAR calculations. They are shown for reference only.
ALSO ALSO NOTE: Somehow, inexorably, certain readers have used this DH post as a launching point for complaints about the designated hitter rule, as though the uninspiring WAR totals made for a compelling case in favor of watching Matt Garza strike out on three pitches. But the DH position has a vastly different baseline than your typical hitter. Also, because their fielding ability has no contribution outlet, they are limited only to their batting and base-running contributions.
In 2012, DHs added 220.4 hitting runs and -53.8 base-running runs. Pitchers added -792.1 batting and -34.3 base-running runs. WHAT NOW, BRO!?

The Orioles are not giving Wilson Betemit 500+ PAs by any means. They’re going to use his .370 wOBA vs RHPs from last year while also using the spot as a way of giving guys like Reimold, Davis, etc. a semi-break.
The only way Wilson Betemit gets 500 PAs is if the rest of the Orioles are abducted by aliens before May 1st and Boog isn’t willing to come in from the BBQ stand and DH. He’ll be platooning with someone likely Steve Pearce, maybe Danny Valencia or Conor Jackson. Even then he probably won’t get more than 2/3 of the ABs vs Righties.
This is now one of my all-time favorite comments for the portion about Boog. Well done (and agreed).
Along the same lines though. It’s unlikely that Boesch gets 210 PA at the DH with the Yankees. Early season he will be in the field everyday, then is still pronk/jeter at dh, and midseason Arod/Youk worked into that mix.
If Betemit gets as few as 324 plate appearances his 2014 option vests and the O’s are on the hook for $3.2 million. Either he rakes RHP hard enough to justify the playing time and the option next year, or he doesn’t and they release him. Even if he does hit, can Baltimore afford to spend $3.2 million on a platoon DH?
“Smith, 30, is more weathered, but altogether this DH/OF trio is young, exciting, and better positioned than, though mathematically inferior to, more than one of the teams ranked above of them.”
What does this even mean?
It’s strangely worded, but it sounds like he’s saying ‘Smith is entering his 30’s, but that aside this trio (Smith, Reddick, Cespedes) is young and exciting. And while their WAR figure is lower than the teams above them their future is brighter than more than one of them.’
Or at least that’s what I got out of it 🙂
Which of these teams will Matt Adams out-DH this year?
Carlos Santana projected at only about 457 AB across C, 1B and DH? Is this an actual projection or a FG play time allocation goof?
Sorry, 457 plate appearances, no at bats. Seems odd to project that Balt will give more playing time to Betemit and Cle will to its best hitter.
Agreed, seems on the low end by at least 100 PA. Not sure those extra PA’s would fall at DH but a mix of extra C and 1B plate appearances seems more realistic given his history and other projected playing time figures on this site.
457 plate appearances, no at bats?
that’s a lot of walks.
Ugh, yes, pre-coffee typo bonanza in my posts.
Rumor is he’s been more concerned with his champagne side business during the offseason.
Projection system probably took that into account in reducing his playing time.
If Wilson Betamit gets 525 PA, I’ll eat every one of my Orioles hats… right after I tear up my Buck Fan Club membership card.
“his underwhelming 2013 bounce-back”
You mean 2012? Maybe I misread, but this should be 2012 right?
Fixed. Thanks.
When the corpse of Travis Hafner is not in the bottom third of DHs, you know that the current DH crop is bad
I know, it’s been a whole zero seasons since he had a 119 wRC+
The average AL team will get 1.7 WAR from their DHs. This is not making a very compelling case to bring the DH to the National League.
On top of that, it tells me that the DH argument for AL superiority over the last decade is no longer a valid one–if it ever was. I’d imagine most NL teams could scrape together 1.7 WAR from bench parts, and given how little they have to use the DH I don’t think the AL advantage at that lineup spot is much of an advantage at all.
The difference in payrolls between AL and NL drives some of the talent disparity.
Not sure if there’s such a disparity anymore, with the free-wheelin’ Dodgers and the newly spendthrift (for them) Yankees.
And the DH drives some of the payroll disparity.
So here we are in this quaint little moebias strip.
I can see why the simplicity (meant in this way like elegance or purity) of the 9 fielders and 9 hitters being the same players is appealing, but it doesn’t really add anything to the game. It doesn’t seem to do much of anything besides reserve a black hole in the lineup for 6 or 7 innings. An NL manager needs to make more substitutions, but these aren’t necessarily better or more strategic than the equivalent optional substitutions in the AL.
I like watching pitchers bat. I really like it when they get hits.
I also like the strategy elements you mention: pinch-hitting, double switches etc. sure you have PH opportunities in the AL, but the NL has a much bigger potential gain in PH for the pitcher, and also greater cost, in that he cannot return to pitch in the next inning.
maybe I am in the minority, but I like having pitchers bat in the NL. I also like having the DH in the AL, as it makes for a different style and I think the variety is nice.
Also strategic pitching. Actual useful situations for bunts. 2nd and 3rd with 2 outs in the 2nd inning, 8 hole up. Do you intentionally wall to get to the pitcher?
Because the oWAR for NL pitchers is so much better than 1.7???
You’re either being intentionally dense or you actually don’t know how interleague games work. Either way, weird that you’re getting credit for it; I guess fangraphs commenters are just very pro-DH.
You’re right, but you won’t convince any pro-DH’ers. The fact that only one DH is worth much is irrelevant to them.
Yeah, let’s get rid of those 750-800 OPS dudes so we can watch some 500 OPS guys flail away. Makes total sense!
It does to me. The stupidity of having a gimmick at all is only tolerable if there is some massive gain to be had by doing it. The difference between having guys with .300 to .800 OPS vs guys with .700 to .850 OPS isn’t such a massive gain as to introduce a fundamentally silly idea as making each team play two half-players rather than one whole one.
Ivan,
The OPS of NL pitchers last year was .330 in 5594 PA
The OPS of AL Designated Hitters last year was .787 in 11598 PA
That is a “massive gain.”
It doesn’t matter if it was a 600-point OPS difference, there will be no convincing the anti-DH camp. Nor would there be any convincing the pro-DH camp of the superior strategy and intricacy of letting the pitchers hit.
It’s not unlike arguing religion and politics; people have their preconceived opinions and ignore any arguments to the contrary (on both sides). You never hear, “gee, that’s a really good point; I should reconsider!”
you may not be aware of how bad at hitting pitchers are
Pitchers hitting probably costs a team 1-2 WAR per year.
Also: pitchers, hitting.
You do realize that pitchers get a positional adjustment for oWAR just like every other position, right? The Nationals and Mets each got 0.7 oWAR from their pitchers in what amounts to a half season of ABs.
you do realize that .7 oWAR is less than the lowest projected DH production?
Piling on, piling on.
Part of it seems to be a move away from everyday dh, and towards rotating it.
These rankings will be more interesting if and when Victor Martinez stops being the DH for the Detroit Tigers, whether that is this year due to injury or next year for contractual reasons, which will likely either move Miguel Cabrera or Prince Fielder to DH. Castellanos really is a wild card here since they’ll need to determine if he is playing 3B or LF long term. It is assumed Cabrera moves off 3B, but I’m afraid it won’t happen.
Cabrera is actually more valuable at 3B than DH due to positional adjustment.
But depends on roster construction and who is available.
Pathetic, I’d rather watch pitchers hit.
So, since the current AL DH crop seems rather mediocre, you would rather watch abjectly worse hitters attempt to hit? Makes sense. Got it.
Makes total sense! I had a hangnail so I cut my arm off at the shoulder. Took care of THAT little problem!
Could we have Positional Power Rankings for NL pitchers’ hitting? It’s not very important, but it is a bit important.
Hey! The Mariners finally finish in the top 15 for a position! Take that, other teams! M’s rule!
The Mariners insane accumulation of DH-1B-LF “power hitters” this off-season resulting in this poor of an expectation from the DH’s again proves that no matter how high you pile crap, it’s still crap.
Is it safe to assume that the Marlins are 30th?
Olt was optioned to the minors Tue.. Not that that affects the seasonlong DH possibility, but, could have been noted in the text
2013 Cool Name Power Rankings: Designated Hitter
1. Lance Berkman
2. Kendrys Morales
3. Albert Pujols
4. Prince Fielder
5. Mike Carp
6. Andy Dirks
7. Shelley Duncan
8. Billy Butler
9. Nate Freiman
10. Wilson Betemit
NOTES
– Sorry I’m late. I overslept due to alcohol consumption.
– I excluded Yoenis Cespedes from this category because I thought it would be ungentlemanly of Mr. Cespedes to be ranked #1 at two separate positions.
Have you accepted Jesus (Montero) into your list? If Mark changes his name, as suggested by the author, to “Renyolds” where would he rank?
By the by, in baseball we call hangovers “flu-like symptoms”.
I think Butler deserves bonus points for “Country Breakfast”.
That would be only fair, since I plan to award Craig Stammen bonus points for his nickname, “Plant Sex.”
Thankyou for the top ranking of big papi. He owes it all to his pharmacist who is always 2 steps ahead of mlb’s anti cheating committee.
Now if he can cheat his way for a couple more years, 500 homeruns and the hof are not out of the question.
This genre is kind of boring, and I bore people for a living.
Where is Ryan Theriot of the Giants?
On his couch.
Hi,
I like your chart at the top of the article. I like it so much I think you should make one for each position and include each team’s logo in the circle along with the rank. This site is called fangraphs after all, so I suggest you make some more of those awesome graphs.
Thank You Kindly for Reviewing My Suggestion,
Evan
I went with number because I didn’t want to spoil the fun of scrolling down the page like mad until you found your team. I seriously considered going the logo route, though.
Do it for a summary article for all positions? PLEASE? (I guess I could do it for funsies on my own)
Totally agree.
This entry was one of the best presented and written, although one more polish might’ve avoided a few nits.
The Giants are way too low on this list. I think you guys hate the Giants.
If that’s the real Grant Brisbee, let me say that you excel at writing, and I am glad you cover baseball. I would read your coverage of Chinlone.
Jeter will be the primary Yankee DH against LHP, not Boesch or Rivera/Johnson. Hafner will sit against all LHP and Jeter will move to DH to rest his ankle. That means more Nunez at SS. Ouch.
Tell me about it…
Despite the jibes, with more inter-league games being played this year, it would be mildly worthwhile compiling the DH ratings for NL teams as well.
Are there actually more inter league games? Or are they just more dispersed? Maybe 3 more games per team?
Expert use of the word, “Voluptuous.”
Sad that the M’s spent so much of the winter, and possibly into last couple seasons, accumulating so many OF/DH, 1b/DH, C/DH, PH/DH types… and even among DHs in the AL they’re in the bottom third. Even the LOLstros rank signficantly higher.
Sweet fancy Moses, do I ever miss Edgar.
Excellent writing. Thank you.
DH seems a little difficult to order, with all the playing time situations in flux. I am certain the Astros are too high. Carlos Pena looked completely finished last year. The Rays think James Loney is an improvement. Pena’s as likely as anyone in baseball to be a negative WARrior this year.
I think the Indians and Mariners are both going to outperform their computer-projected ranking here. They’re largely unpopular players on these pages, but between Reynolds-Santana-Aviles-Giambi and Morales-Morse-Montero-Ibanez these teams seem likely to get better than bottom five production at DH.
“On pure hitting talent, I would take Lance Berkman over Billy Butler.”
I found this odd. Billy Butler is in his prime, and while his prime isn’t as good as Berkman’s prime was there is no way Lance Berkman is a better hitter than Billy Butler today. There is also no way Lance Berkman is getting 490 PAs.
It’s almost as if the very next sentence should read:
“But Berkman is aged, is post-injured, and on the slippery side of the aging slope.”
Also, I think the DHs should get extra credit for being completely, absurdly terrible at their defensive positions (eg Big Papi, Luke Scott, does Travis Hafner even have a defacto defensive position?)
Pronk played some first base as recently as… 2007. That’s also the last time he played in more than 120 games.
Also, Ortiz isn’t terrible. Most defensive metrics have him as just slightly below average for his career, and having watched most of his yearly cameos at first base with the Red Sox, I’m inclined to agree.
Big sloppy going to be that valuable with constant interleague play? Or am I overstating the affect that has? Also, if I used the wrong “effect/affect”, piss off.
You are overstating it.
So, you rank David Ortiz and co. and would take Lance Berkman over Billy Butler. So, are you the same guy that pisses in the sink instead of the urinal at the ballpark, too?
butler is projected to out-WAR berkman…
Checks rankings…nope, Butler is still ranked ahead of Berkman.
Your projections are selling my guy short!!! WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Sincerely,
Fanboy
Ortiz is all but certainly starting the season on the DL.
When I was looking at last year’s DH splits for the Mariners, I saw something that probably explains one of the more perplexing front office moves of the offseason: The Mariners trading their best hitter last season, a young LH cost controlled catcher under team control until 2016, John Jaso, for Mike Morse an over 30 outfielder who gives up with the glove quite a bit of what he provides with his bat.
It wasn’t about not liking Jaso’s glove, or liking Morse’s hitting so much, it was about giving Jesus Montero 450AB at the catching position. It is pretty striking, and probably worth finding out whether there is actually something meaningful here:
Jesus Montero
POS PA Avg OBP SLG
C 230 0.310 0.343 0.498
DH 321 0.226 0.265 0.309
We do know that there is a DH penalty, it may just be that Montero is an extreme outlier in terms of a DH penalty or its just an BABIP differnce:
ISO K% BB% BABIP
C 0.188 16.5% 5.7% 0.331
DH 0.083 19.0% 4.7% 0.265
Whatever the reason for his positional splits being so extreme, I think the M’s decided its worth seeing if he can put up those numbers playing catcher near full time, despite his defensive liabilities.
“In 2012, DHs added 220.4 hitting runs and -53.8 base-running runs. Pitchers added -792.1 batting and -34.3 base-running runs. WHAT NOW, BRO!?”
It’s still a dumb rule. Dumb.
Projecting A-Rod for only something like 70 PAs all season (35 at 3B and 35 at DH) seems unrealistically pessimistic to me. More speculative than based on the evidence that we have.