Aaron Judge, Colossus of Clout

For a moment, it seemed like Aaron Judge might not reach 62 home runs. After hitting his 61st in Toronto last Wednesday, he fell into what counts as a slump for him these days: four games, two hits, and a handful of walks. After feeling inevitable for most of September, 62 suddenly felt tenuous.
What a foolish sentiment. Judge, as we’ve seen all year, is a home run machine. He’s an offensive machine, in fact, blowing away the rest of the league with the kind of performance not seen since Barry Bonds in his prime. Unlike most single-season home run chases, Judge’s season isn’t defined by a single round number. His offensive greatness is so robust, so all-encompassing, that treating this accomplishment as the crowning achievement of his season is unfair.
The single-season home run record in major league baseball is 73. It was set in 2001, by Barry Bonds. Sixty-one has a ring to it, of course, because it was the record for so long. It was also the American League and Yankee record, two marks that feel weighty even if they aren’t quite as impressive as “best of all time.” Plenty of the fanfare around Judge comes from the sheer rarity of seeing so many homers, but plenty also comes from the fact that some fans would prefer to ignore everything that happened from 1998 to 2001 and make the record 61 again.
I’m giving you permission to tune all of that out. Sixty-two home runs is cool regardless of what the all-time record is. Only six players have ever accomplished the feat of hitting 60 home runs, and you know all of their names: Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Roger Maris, Babe Ruth, and now Judge. That alone is mind-blowing; baseball has been around an impossibly long time, through periods of high and low scoring, and yet only six players have ever cracked 60 home runs in a year throughout it all.
Does that mean hitting 62 is anti-climactic? I’ll leave that interpretation up to you. But more so than any one increment – would it be special at 63? 65? – I’m impressed by how handily Judge has lapped the league today. Is it cool to pass Maris? Undoubtedly. If nothing else, now Judge’s future offspring can traipse around the country and opine about someone else’s homers hit in the far-off future. More pressingly, though, Judge has left the rest of baseball behind in a way not seen for many years.
Home runs aren’t hit in a vacuum. The majors go through home run droughts and booms for myriad reasons, including pitcher talent, park dimensions, pitching style, and baseball composition. It’s hard to say whether 2022 Judge or 1961 Maris hit under easier conditions, but one way to look at it is to consider how many home runs separate the major league leader from their closest challenger at the end of each season. By that standard, Judge is in impressive company. Here are the top 11 seasons (including a 10th place tie) by home run gap since the dawn of the 20th century:
| Year | Gap | Leader | Runner-Up |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1921 | 35 | Babe Ruth | Bob Meusel |
| 1920 | 35 | Babe Ruth | George Sisler |
| 1926 | 26 | Babe Ruth | Hack Wilson |
| 1928 | 23 | Babe Ruth | Jim Bottomley |
| 1924 | 19 | Babe Ruth | Jack Fournier |
| 1932 | 17 | Jimmie Foxx | Babe Ruth |
| 1919 | 17 | Babe Ruth | Gavvy Cravath |
| 2022 | 16 | Aaron Judge | Kyle Schwarber |
| 1933 | 14 | Jimmie Foxx | Babe Ruth |
| 1965 | 13 | Willie Mays | Willie McCovey |
| 1927 | 13 | Babe Ruth | Lou Gehrig |
First, yeah, that Babe Ruth guy was pretty good. Since the 1920s and ’30s, though, no one has done what Judge is doing. The only player to come close was Willie Mays, not exactly shabby company. Last year, Shohei Ohtani won an MVP by playing the way people think Babe Ruth did – pitching and hitting. This year, Judge is likely going to win an MVP by playing like Ruth actually did: with a ludicrous string of home runs that makes everyone else playing look like a weakling by comparison.
Even without that gap between Judge and Kyle Schwarber, though, this season would be an all-timer. The great arrow of baseball time points inexorably towards more uniformity and more talent. It’s a professional game; even the up-and-down bullpen arms and utility infielders of today work year-round at their craft, honing their bodies and minds in pursuit of fame and riches. In a sport where we measure success relative to a league baseline, that means it’s harder than ever to stand out.
This arc of progress isn’t some new phenomenon. Stephen Jay Gould, the late and celebrated biologist, wrote about it in 1986, though he framed it in terms of the extinction of .400 hitters. Standing out from the field simply gets harder with every generation because even the lesser lights of baseball now search for every possible edge.
To wit: wRC+, our marquee offensive statistic here at FanGraphs, considers a player’s production relative to his peers. A 150 wRC+ has no fixed statistical translation. It merely means that a player’s overall batting line is 50% better than the league as a whole. Judge’s mark – 208 heading into today’s action – means that he’s 108% better than the overall league.
In Ruth’s day, when dinosaurs walked the earth and many of baseball’s best players weren’t allowed to play in the same league as him, a 200 wRC+ wasn’t particularly uncommon. But as competition increased, players lapped the rest of the field less often. Ruth and Ted Williams each had career wRC+ marks that approached 200. Since 1972, though, there have only been nine individual seasons that eclipsed 200:
| Year | Player | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Barry Bonds | 244 |
| 2001 | Barry Bonds | 235 |
| 2004 | Barry Bonds | 233 |
| 2003 | Barry Bonds | 212 |
| 2022 | Aaron Judge | 208 |
| 1994 | Jeff Bagwell | 205 |
| 1994 | Frank Thomas | 205 |
| 1998 | Mark McGwire | 205 |
| 2020 | Juan Soto | 202 |
Jeff Bagwell, Frank Thomas, and Juan Soto all accomplished their feats in shortened seasons. Bonds – well, he’s Barry Bonds. That just leaves Judge and McGwire out of the last half-century. Heck, order every season by wRC+ and exclude Bonds, and that gives Judge the best single season relative to his peers since Williams (223) and Mickey Mantle (217) posted similarly absurd seasons in 1957.
If I had my druthers, that’s how Judge’s season would be remembered. Sixty-two home runs is neat, and I’m glad he got there. A 16-homer lead on the field is spectacular, the stuff that only long-forgotten icons of the game have ever even dreamed of. But putting together an offensive season that blows away the rest of the league to this degree, at a time when his peers are as good as they are? Goodness gracious. We probably won’t see another season like Aaron Judge’s 2022 in our lifetimes. Let’s appreciate it.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
11.4 WAR tho. I did not ever expect to see that, from a pitcher because of workloads and from a hitter because pitchers are just so good. Anyone who had a chance would get a ton of value from defense like Betts and Trout (not that they aren’t fantastic hitters, but lotta dWAR in their biggest years of value thus far). Judge is a very good defender too but he really slugged his way to this. He hit a pace and he just kept going.
At the very least, he’s average defensively and on the base paths which makes him the uncommon slugger who doesn’t give runs back to WAR with the glove or his legs.
Thomas in 1994 was -16.3 RAR on defense and baserunning (113 games)
McGwire in 1998 was -24.9
Soto in 2020 was -4.4 (47 games)
Bonds and Bagwell were pretty close to neutral in the years listed, like Judge this year.
Right, he has 16 steals too, somehow.
Judge has basically had the age-30 season that many of us had expecting from Mike Trout before he kept losing big chunks of time to injuries.
Interesting list of players who’ve hit 50+ homers more than once:
Babe Ruth
Jimmie Foxx
Ralph Kiner
Mickey Mantle
Willie Mays
Ken Griffey Jr.
Mark McGwire
Sammy Sosa
Alex Rodriguez
Aaron Judge
Of these, Kiner is probably the closest offensive comparison to Judge — he was an absolutely atrocious fielder which brought his overall value down, but when you lead your league in home runs in your first 7 years in the majors and have a career walk rate over 16%, you’re going to be a valuable player. As a short career player, Kiner is also probably a pretty good comparison for what Judge’s Hall of Fame case might end up looking like. It took Kiner 15 years on the ballot to get elected, and that was at least partly due to his becoming a beloved tv broadcaster. We’ll have to see where Judge’s career goes from here — it’s possible that he gets the Barry Bonds treatment going forward and puts up some absolutely insane OBP’s; it’s possible he gets hurt, who knows? But I can’t wait to see it, hopefully in pinstripes.
The odd thing about Kiner is how durable he was, averaging 147 games/yr. Considering that his career was notoriously cut short by injury, this always blows my mind.
Not counting 2020, Albert Pujols has averaged 145 games/season in his career. Only once in 22 seasons has he spent more than 20 days on the DL/IL.
Sort of like Ripken, Albert probably should have taken more time off as he aged with his foot issues.
It’s funny. At a glance, I was thinking how much Judge’s offensive season looks like Hank Greenberg’s 1938.
Hank Greenberg 1938: 58 HR, .315/.438/.683
Aaron Judge 2022: 62 HR, .311/.425/.686
Except Greenberg’s OPS+ is 169, Judge’s is 208!
Greenberg’s an interesting guy though. He missed most of his age 25 season due to injury. Then missed 4 1/2( years (!!) due to WWII- registered for the draft in late 1940 or a little over 1 year before Pearl Harbor..was initally ruled 4F, asked to be rexamined & was found eligible & was inducted into the Army almost immediately. He ended up serving until after V-E day in 1945.
Sure, I wasn’t proposing that their seasons were equally valuable. OPS+ and WAR clearly favor Judge. You make a good point, though. Greenberg would be more of a household name if he hadn’t missed virtually his entire prime to military service.
The words “atrocious fielder” should never be used when when speaking of Judge.
I mean, yeah, that’s one of the reasons he’s a way better player than Kiner.
I find it interesting that 2 of the 4 players with 700+ career home runs (Aaron and Pujols) never hit 50+ in a season.
It’s also interesting that Bonds only hit over 50 once. high 40s multiple times, than suddenly 73 bombs
It’s almost like he was a different player.
He also dropped back down the next year, it was an outlier for him even in those years.
To be fair, that was mostly because teams stopped pitching to him for the next 3 years.
A world-class season from Judge, who is truly worthy of the MVP. To perform like this in the midst of a hunt for the division title is a testament to his fortitude.
On that subject…he’s actually created MORE real offensive value for the Yankees than his WAR indicates.
His RE24 comes in 5 runs above his wRAA!
Huge point. His 9.37 REW (run-equivalent wins), based on RE24 and the run-scoring context of the season, is easily the best in AL history (Giambi is second at 8.99). The only player to have a season with a higher REW in a single season is Barry Bonds.
Another benchmark I like are single season franchise records set. The only angel single season record Ohtani has is most strikeouts in a season by a batter.
Comparing Ohtani to The Babe is apples and oranges. He never asked to be a “2 way player”. He was needed and forced to pitch. Even quit over it briefly. if not for WW1 and a player shortage he would’ve been a full time OF by the end of 1918, as he prefered and more homers. It was a 126 game season and 140 in 1919.
I’m not sure penalizing Ohtani for wanting to remain a two way player makes sense.
When the Ham Fighters won the championship Otani was pitcher first and hitter second. He didn’t qualify for hitting records his last few yrs. I’m sure they know what they’re doing so if he pitched a little more and took some more days off from DH I’d think it would benefit him and the TEAM
What the Angels are doing is not proven formula for a winning team. They’re doing this trial and error. the Ham Fighters seem more advanced analytically than the Angels and pitched him more and hit him in 2/3 of the games. so they’re just doing this to get Ohtani in the lineup every day and sell tickets.
I read this like 5 times and still have no idea what your thesis is
What the Angels are doing is not proven formula for a winning team. They’re doing this trial and error. the Ham Fighters seem more advanced analytically than the Angels and pitched him more and hit him in 2/3 of the games. so they’re just doing this to get Ohtani in the lineup every day and sell tickets.
You dumbin’.
Another standard that I want is setting a franchise record in one season. The single-season record held by Angel Ohtana is the highest hitting streak in a season.
Compare Ohtani with The Babe, it’s an apple and an orange. There is no tradition to be a “two-way player”. It is necessary and must be resolved. Chuck himself fell silent for a while. it is not the farewell of the First World War and the lack of a player, he will become an official figure of the PF at the end of 1918, he is a better player than a domestic player. It was the 126th and 140th of the 1919 season.
So, Darin Erstad > Ohtani.
Erstad is tougher and a better leader. Even rumored to manage the team at one point. During the reunion I believe he called this year”s team soft. He had 240 hits and batted .355. so yeah if take that year over Ohtani
Your troll is extremely weak. You gotta put more work into it. Let me see if I can put it into terms you can understand.
You troll like Angels ownership puts together winning teams.
Hopefully his season can be summarized with “MVP”.
I’m not sure there’s ever been a more obvious MVP
And for all that, including a swing as swift and elegant as I’ve ever seen, he still couldn’t beat The Babe.
There never was an asterisk, but there remain tiers, one for 154 games, and one for 162 games.
154 game season:
Babe Ruth, 1927 – 60
Aaron Judge, 2022 (in the first 154 games of the season) – 60
He did have to face the actual best pitchers in the game rather than just the white ones, if we want to compare eras.
But if you are comparing the player to the rest of the league in each era I’m not sure this matters all that much.
As the quality of a league’s players rises over time the skill gap between the best and worst players does, in fact, flatten out, and more players get an opportunity to be great and come close to that statistical dominance. And integration was the biggest possible jump in player quality a league can have.
You see the most outlandish numbers in any sport in its formative years. Chamberlain in the NBA and Bradman in cricket are the two examples I always think of here, but even in the NHL, where the 80s are a relatively recent period of dominance, Gretzky’s best season comes 18th in individual season goals per game, and every single season ahead of him is from 1918 to 1925 at the league’s very start, including Joe Malone’s 2.2 goals per game compared to Gretzky’s 1.176.
People don’t take this into account as often as they should. It’s not at all to diminish the accomplishments of those players – I personally think it’s cool as hell when a college football player is so clearly ten times better than everyone else on the field – but you really do have to consider overall quality of the league when comparing how much of an outlier two different seasons in two different eras are.
video helps here too. If you watch an NFL tape from the 1970s it looks like a good but not great high school game
Yes, Ruth did not face all of the best pitchers because African-American and many Latino players were excluded from MLB in his era but I’m not sure how much effect the inclusion of those pitchers would have had. Absent any racial discrimination in the hiring of players we would assume that half of the best African-American and dark-skinned Latino pitchers would have been in the National League and would not have faced Ruth in the regular season.
Some of the additional pitchers in that category who did pitch in the American League (and likely some of the best ones) would have been Ruth’s teammates on the Yankees. Of the number of previously excluded pitchers who would have faced Ruth would he have faced them often enough to have a large effect on his numbers?
Obviously we’ll never know but remember that not every Negro League pitcher was Satchel Paige, Martin Dihigo or Bullet Joe Rogan and even those guys gave up home runs to Negro League stars on occasion. The bottom line is that its not a slam dunk that Ruth would not have hit 60 homers in a season in an integrated league.
I think the larger advantages that Ruth had were that 1) he only had 7 other teams to contend with meaning he was facing the same pitchers many more times than modern hitters and 2) he faced the same pitcher more times in a game than hitters do today instead of an army of hard-throwing relief pitchers after the 5th inning.
The NBA was past its formative years when Wilt played. If he played today he would still be the most dominant player in the court. Except for the fact that pro basketball has been ruined by the three point shot rule. So boring to watch now.
if he played today he wouldn’t be the only uber-athletic 7 footer in the league
Basketball has always been boring to watch irregardless of the three point shot rule. There’s just too much scoring with or without it. At least the three-pointer provides more variety to the scoring system.
This is true, but has limits. I don’t think anybody believes that Levi Meyerle or Ross Barnes were tremendously talented baseball players. But Ruth did play against plenty of the best Negro Leaguers, just in unofficial games (to say nothing of the persistent rumors during his playing days that Ruth was himself Black). And I think it’s pretty hard to deny that, even in today’s game, Ruth would have been a star. Wouldn’t stand out from his contemporaries as much, of course, but the man could hit anybody.
Something to keep in mind when people think of old-timey baseball as being anciently removed from today’s game: we are currently only 5 degrees of separation between active players’ careers overlapping with 19th century players’ careers, at least for one more season:
Miguel Cabrera played on the 2005 Florida Marlins with Al Leiter.
Al Leiter played on the 1987 Yankees with Tommy John.
Tommy John played on the 1963 Indians with Early Wynn.
Early Wynn played on the 1939 Senators with Ossie Bleuge.
Ossie Bleuge played on the 1924 Senators with Nick Altrock.
Nick Altrock had his major league debut for the 1898 Louisville Colonels, reached his career highlight as the World Series Game 1 winner for the eventual 1906 Champion White Sox team, and would continue making periodic pitching appearances and pinch hitting appearances all the way through 1933.
If you want to give it a Yankees flair:
Aaron Judge played on the 2016 Yankees with Alex Rodriguez*.
Rodriguez played on the 1994 Mariners with Goose Gossage.
Gossage played on the 1976 White Sox with Minnie Minosa.
Minosa played on the 1949 Indians with Joe Gordon.
Gordon played on the 1938 Yankees with Lou Gehrig.
* Technically ARod’s last game was on August 12 and Judge’s first game was on August 13, but they were in the clubhouse at the same time.
If you’re wondering who the last player standing will be who’s six degrees of separation from the 19th century, it will be whoever is the last active former teammate of either Miguel Cabrera or Robinson Cano (who played with Leiter on the 2005 Yankees).
I agree with your general point, but to some extent Don Bradman’s accomplishments get better over time.
Sure there were fewer test playing nations, but the conditions he was playing on were ludicrously friendly for bowlers. His batting average is almost double what anyone else in history has been able to achieve, on largely uncovered pitches. If baseball had a Don Bradman, he’d have a career 400 wrc+ or something ridiculous.
This is true, but it’d probably just be batting average/OBP as slugging is probably closer to Strike rate in cricket.
Makes sense. One of the things that slips through the cracks these days is just how fast Bradman used to score as well!
If you want a glimpse of baseball analytics in 1990, I’d strongly recommend giving Tendulkar vs Bradman a google.
Don’t forget it took Judge 5 more plate appearances.
Like a chump. [THIS IS SARCASM.]
Never tell people when you’re being sarcastic. You’re better than that.
I appreciate the vote of confidence! [SINCERE]
No, you should do so in writing when you can’t hear anyone’s tone of voice.
you know the Yanks actually played 155 games in the 1927 season, right? How many did Judge hit through 155? 🙂
60
Judge hit #61 in the Yankees’ 155th game
Yep I counted wrong
But were any of Ruth’s HRs in 1927 balls that bounced over the wall, which would be ruled doubles under today’s rules?
I’ve not taken a statistics course in a long time, but I wonder: would a stat like wRC+ but set at standard deviations above average and not percent above average better compare greatness between eras? The fact that there are fewer of these outlier 200 wRC+ seasons makes me think it might. Does that make sense?
Wouldn’t that just consist of…running historical wRC+ through a standard deviation formula?
Would love to see this data. Besides Bonds, Judge might have the best offensive season of all time when framed this way. Ruth/Foxx/Gehrig played against a watered down league. Mantle and Ted Williams played in a league that gave Granny Hammer consistent AB’s. I feel pretty certain that Judge have a higher standard deviation of wRC+ compared to the greats of the past whose competition had asbestos lung.
Not exactly. You’d take the wRC+ – 100 (since the mean is 100 by definition), then divide by the standard deviation in that season. Then you’d have a wRC+ based in deviations above or below average. This type of normalization is pretty common in work I do. We also generally shouldn’t be assuming equal variance data and should test for equal variance before certain types of comparisons.
I did this once with per season WAR. The variability of the season-to-season variability is definitely non-trivial and doing this type of standard deviation normalization makes pretty big differences.
https://www.athleticsnation.com/2022/2/9/22925757/why-all-your-career-war-leader-boards-are-wrong
Thanks for the linked article. This is exactly the concept I’m struggling to communicate.
No problem. It was a fun exercise and I suppose I might do it again with wRC+ given Judge’s performance.
That is fascinating info and write-up! Thank you.
Interesting to see Ozzie–my favorite player–make the career list at #49. Was it comparatively rare to be a great in the NL in the ’80s & early ’90s?
5 minutes on excel and based on hitters this year with 350 or more PAs (n=246), Judge’s WRC+ is 4.4 standard deviations above the mean, which is good. I didn’t check if this sample of hitters has normally distributed WRC+, and I also didn’t check whether the mean for this sample is 100 (would think it’s slightly higher as many of the below-average players don’t make it to 350 PAs before getting sent down).
I may not ever get tired of this info: He is now at 11.5 fWAR. Aside from a handful of roided out Barry Bonds years, he is now tied for the best position player season since integration (Mickey Mantle in 1956).
(And if he even adds 0.1 fWAR to his total he will beat Mantle and he will have the single best season for a position player since integration, sans roided Bonds. And if he goes absolutely crazy and adds 0.2 fWAR, he’ll have the highest fWAR among any player in that timeframe)
This is mind-boggling. This is stupendous. This is shocking. This is not a one-in-a-decade kind of thing; this is not a once-in-a-generation kind of thing. This is the most stunning season for a position player in 65 years. Enjoy every second of it. I suppose he could come back next year and do it again, but it literally doesn’t get any better than this.
I actually think Judge’s season is kind of being overshadowed by his HR total. Everyone seems to be super focused on 62 (and fair enough) and not really paying attention to the fact that he is having the greatest offensive season, maybe ever?
An 11+ WAR season is something I never thought I would ever see. Its truly hard to even comprehend how good he has been this year.
WAR includes defense and baserunning, though. It’s his 207 wRC+ while playing almost every game that shows how incredibly dominant a hitter he is this year.
11.5 WAR is just nuts. I didn’t realize his WAR was so high. Ohtani’s pitching plus batting WAR is “only” 9.3. Okay I guess there really isn’t an MVP debate this year like I thought there would be.
Ohtani has been in unbelievable and in most years a 9 win season will let you cakewalk out of there with the MVP. It is insane that Ohtani is doing the second most ridiculous thing of the last 65 years and he’s going to lose the MVP. Just mind blowing.
Oh, so the Judge homer update, which also doubles as a I-can’t-believe-he-did this update: I saw #61. I got to Toronto, I took one of the kids and a couple of coworkers (we just all kind of moved up there for a couple of days), caught a couple of games at the SkyDome (er, Rogers Centre). #61 looked like a breaking ball that didn’t break; it looked like a mistake pitch (the Toronto crowd knew what they were seeing, gave him a standing ovation).
The thing that is remarkable about #61 and #62–and part of the reason why he’s managed to maintain this blistering offensive pace despite not hitting that many homers in that stretch–is that pitchers decided they wouldn’t give him anything good to look at. I think the first game I went to they walked him 4 times. None of them were officially intentional but none of the pitches were really close to the strike zone. So he’s been keeping his OBP up very nicely because the Blue Jays (and I suppose other teams too) have been putting him on base rather than give him any good looks. Clearly, nobody wanted to be the pitcher who gave up a record-tying or breaking homer.
So keeping up his overall offensive dominance wasn’t quite as hard as it sounds because starting from the Boston series they were just handing him first base, but getting to #61 and #62 is a real accomplishment. From 9/22-10/2 (so the BOS, TOR, and BAL series) he only hit a single home run but had a wRC+ of 170 because those teams walked him 38.6% of the time.
I gotta say, when I actually think about it, I don’t fully get the walking.
It would be one thing if he was just getting walked all the time, like Bonds was during his crazy seasons, but the walks clearly increased when he got to 60. So it was definitely about the record.
The standard explanation is “pitchers don’t want to give up the record breaker,” but…why not? Is there any shame in giving up someone’s SIXTY-SECOND home run? I guess you’ll be “in the record books” for it, but it’s not like the pitcher who gave up Maris’ 61st is now remembered for being a lousy pitcher, or even for screwing up. He’s just the dude who happened to be there.
Plus, by definition, pro athletes are all hyper-competitive little monsters. Isn’t this a perfect situation to rev up your competitive engine? You have a chance to try to beat a guy who’s performing better than almost anyone else has in your lifetime. If you get him out, you’ll forever have the bragging rights that you struck out Aaron Judge in 2022. And if he takes you deep, nobody’s gonna hold it against you, because, again, it’s Aaron Judge in 2022! Heck, a lot of these teams weren’t playing meaningful games anymore, so you wouldn’t even be hurting your team. There’s literally no risk!
I dunno. I get pitching around a guy who’s on fire, especially for teams that were still in a race. But this level of avoidance simply to not be the guy/team who gives up a record-breaker was pretty lame.
I don’t think it’s about the history books — it’s about the next few days. Players are competitive. They have egos. If they make a mistake, they don’t want to spend every minute of the next week having to talk to reporters about it ad nauseum, especially in the context of celebrating an opposing player who is universally considered more talented.
Not to mention during this series in particular, the Jay were still scrabbling for a) the Wild Card (and then later, home field advantage). They secured both. I am not sure, but I seem to recall reading somewhere that in spite of that even, they still gave him a pitch or two to hit each at bat. (Obviously they were super cautious with him, but is not like they completely pitched around him.)
This is the intro to Tracy Stallard’s Wikipedia entry:
Evan Tracy Stallard (August 31, 1937 – December 6, 2017) was an American professional baseball player, a Major League Baseball pitcher from 1960 to 1966. He played with the Boston Red Sox, New York Mets and St. Louis Cardinals.
Stallard is most remembered for having given up New York Yankees slugger Roger Maris’ 61st home run in 1961.
That stuff lasts forever.
I can only tell you what happened in Toronto but the crowd was tired of the walks. They wanted the pitcher to challenge him; there was much grumbling and rumbling.
My sense was that they wanted him out and not to hit a homer but I don’t think the crowd minded when he did hit one either. The walks definitely rubbed people the wrong way.
I will forever remember Stu Miller who intentionally groove a pitch to Mickey Mantle for his 500th homerun. Otherwise, I would not know who he was all these years later.
Didn’t he get two strikes on 3 of those 4 walks?
I don’t think getting walks because pitchers are afraid of you needs to be discounted. The fear is part of his dominance, as it was for Bonds. The only negative aspect, in my view, is that once it started happening it cost him any chance at the Triple Crown because he would not get any credit for so much of his offensive production being tied to walks while still being penalized for all of his outs.
A truly phenomenal and rare season! Glad I got to see him play a couple times.
I’m surprised Judge wasn’t intentionally walked more (just 19 times) as the season progressed and it became clear he elevated his game from excellent to downright unstoppable.
Will be interesting to see next season if he gets the Barry Bonds treatment and piles up an insane amount of intentional walks, and in silly ways like when the bases are loaded, or with nobody on in tie game in the 9th.
He started getting the “unintentional intentional walks” treatment about 2 weeks ago. I figure it’ll probably continue next season unless he’s playing somewhere with a superstar hitter behind him in the lineup. None of his potential suitors really fit that bill (the best hitter potentially hitting behind him next year would be… Pete Alonso? Who isn’t exactly Lou Gehrig).
Ben, way back in the spring you said, in one of your chats, that it was great that Judge was healthy and doing Judgian things. I responded, with my tongue firmly implanted in my cheek, my handle says it all, with “No it was definitely NOT great that Judge was back” while acknowledging that he was a great player. Your response was an appropriate LOL. As a baseball fan first and a Red Sox fan second let me acknowledge that it is definitely great that Aaron Judge has added so much to the game of baseball this season. This is an appropriate time, as well, to show my appreciation for your continuing production of high quality articles. Thank you!!
You’re welcome, and thank you for the kind words. I’ll definitely admit that it’s harder to enjoy Judge’s brilliance if you’re rooting for the Red Sox, though. At least he didn’t hit #62 against them.
At least Yankees fans finally have something to celebrate, and the Yankees can finally get some media coverage. Sigh.
“The Colossus of Clout.”
“The Colossus of Clout.”
Sorry, that’s immediately what my mind goes to whenever I see/hear those words.
The King of Crash, man.
The Great Bambino!
Oh, I thought you said “The Great Bambi”.
That wimpy deer?!!
“Shut up, Tommy.”
That was very much the intent. It also helps that Aaron Judge is a colossus.
The King of Crash, man!
Wimpy? He defeated that rival buck and square to get Faline as his mate. Then he fought off a bunch of hunting dogs, literally walked off a bullet wound to his leg, and escaped a forest fire.
One measure of just how rare a wRC+ north of 200 is, especially in recent seasons, is all the great hitters who never did it. I was so surprised at how few names were in Ben’s wRC+ table that I had to go look up some of the guys I expected to be on there. Hank Aaron never did it–peaked at 191 in 1971, and he only played 139 games that year. Mike Schmidt never did it–peaked at 198 in the strike year of 1981. Mike Trout hasn’t done it–peaked at 189 in 2021 (36 games) and 188 in 2018 (140 games). Bryce Harper’s massive 2015 doesn’t make it–wRC+ of 197. Wade Boggs in 1987 doesn’t make it (wRC+ 171). wRC+ over 200 in a full season really is almost unfathomable.
A few more:
-Miguel Cabrera in 2013 (Triple Crown): wRC+ 193
-Carl Yastrzemski in 1967 (Triple Crown): wRC+ 194
-George Brett in 1980 (hit .390 in 117 games): wRC+ 198
-Mookie Betts in 2018 (10.6 WAR): wRC+ 185
The triple crown was 2012. Miggy was much better in 2013 though
Whoops, my bad! Should’ve double checked rather than going by memory.
Albert Pujols topped out at 184 in 2003 and 2008
Dick Allen topped out at 199 in 1972
Rickie Henderson topped out at 190 in 1990
Willie Mays topped out at 186 in 1965
Frank Robinson topped out at 195 in 1966
Harmon Killebrew topped out at 176 in 1967
Reggie Jackson topped out at 179 in 1969
Jim Thome topped out at 189 in 2002
ARod topped out at 175 in 2007
Larry Walker topped out at 177 in 1997
Edgar Martinez topped out at 182 in 1995
Manny Ramirez topped out at 185 in 2002
David Ortiz topped out at 175 in 2007
Ken Griffey Jr. topped out at 164 in 1993 and 1994
Christian Yelich in 2019 “only” had a wRC+ of 174
Ryan Howard in 2006 “only” had a wRC+ of 162, to my mild surprise.
-Albert Pujols in 2003 and 2008: wRC+ 184
EDIT: Oh, someone beat me to it.
Acquired through breaking the law and blatantly breaking the rules of the game. Also known as cheating. Lance Armstrong has been stripped of all his records* and titles*. The same is done to olympians who acquire medals through cheating. No one with integrity or morals considers 73 to be the record. Aaron Judge is the true single-season home run king.
Couldn’t disagree more. Unlike Lance Armstrong, Bonds played in the environment that was allowed (perhaps even actively encouraged) by MLB. I wish he would simply be known as the greatest player of the Steroid Era, the same way we talk about Modern Era, Dead Ball Era, etc. That both puts him in context and doesn’t whitewash that what Bonds did was not an only individual failing but a systematic one as well.
The analogy with the Olympics and Cycling is flawed. It would only be a proper analogy if there were no doping rules and no testing at the Olympics, many insiders and higher-ups were in-the-know about their star athletes doping, the media and the public should have known based on the evidence in front of their eyes, and it basically turned out that all of the premier athletes were doing it.
This. There was no mystery to what Bonds was doing. If there’s an asterisk to be planted anywhere, it should be firmly on the forehead of the commissioner.
The media and public DID know. McGwire had a bottle of Andro on his locker shelf for all to see. It was no secret. Fans taunted Jose Canseco with “Steroids” chants in 1988. That was 10 years before 70 HRs and 13 before 73. The failings are not with the individual players.
Andro was legal at the time, though, while steroids were not. While there were heavy suspicions at the time, the proof didn’t actually come until after those record breaking years.
But the ex post facto judgement of Mcgwire doesn’t rest on the legality anyway. Everyone knew, or easily could have known, what Andro was but did nothing to stop it. Heck in 1997 the Olympics banned it. Like I said, this wasn’t a secret. The impression it was somehow secret is just coming from the league and media trying to hide their culpability.
There was no reason to stop him from taking Andro, as it was still legal in MLB and a legal purchase in the United States at the time. Even today, nobody really cares that he was using that as a supplement during his record-breaking year.
The illegal (per U.S. law) steroids he did were a secret until he clammed up in court and later admitted it himself.
That’s revisionist nonsense, sorry, or at best highly selective memory. Plenty of people didn’t care that Andro wasn’t specifically against the rules. They still saw it as doping and didn’t need to wait for him to admit it in 2010.
“The failings are not with the individual players.”
Thinking like this disgusts me. If not the individual then who? Systems? They don’t exist, we’re all free, brave, and fully informed
It is the system that perpetuates a culture, yes. The individual can choose to do something or not, but in a culture that rewards a particular ‘bad’ behavior then some will do that behavior to reap the reward. We only judge McGwire, Bonds or a select few others, because they rose to the top of that culture. But there where hundreds of others that might have never had MLB careers if not for steroids that we don’t care about. They created harm too though, by taking up rosters spots from guys that might want to make the ‘right’ choice. And there are still others that may have been the ‘poster boys’ of the steroid era and risen to the top of the culture if it wasn’t for Bonds, etc.
So from the society stand point, the individual choice is rather irrelevant. Sure McGwire could have chosen not to take steroids, but then with a permissive culture, it was just going to be someone else. Once the rules, laws and culture are in line, then we can judge individuals. But what we’re doing now is judging those individuals not even in real time, but with years of hindsight while looking the other way when it came to the culture and rules at the time.
That kind of thinking is far more disgusting.
This is sarcastic, right?
Steroids were still illegal in both the U.S. and Canada, so technically they weren’t allowed by MLB.
However, you’re correct that since no enforcement was in place at the time, they can’t strip any records or titles.
There were almost certainly more cyclists doping than baseball players, haha
I may get voted down for this but here goes: why do you assume Judge (or anyone else) is clean?
Seems to me the assumption should be one of neutrality, of not knowing. The fact that Judge has never failed a drug test is interesting but doesn’t prove anything. Arod never failed a drug test. Nor did Lance Armstrong (whom you mentioned). And I’m sure there are lots and lots and lots of other athletes who have used steroids and never been caught.
We also know that this year was particularly strange since there was no testing during the lockout. Many experts were concerned about what would happen and talked about how easy it would be to use a fast acting cream that would provide benefits throughout the season but would be undetectable once testing resumed. Some even predicted the return of the 50 home run season.
Again, I’m not accusing Judge or anyone else of cheating. Just saying that we know the tests are fairly easy to evade. So not failing a drug test may mean a player is clean. Or it may not. We really don’t have any way of knowing.
That’s true, which is another reason we’ll never actually see any removal or asterisks concerning PEDs in the record books.
Still, in the current era of testing, Judge is much more likely to be clean than not.
Agreed – I think that this would have been a big ‘meh’ if the record had come in the ludicrous ball season of 2019, but to see him break the record in a season that has largely been defined by complaints about the offensive environment is impressive.
Had it been 2019 he may have broken Bonds’ record. I remember reading somewhere that he lost about 20 HRs to the change in the ball.
I thought the HR suppression stopped less than half way through the season?
Banal observation, but ideas like “records should be judged via their era” tend to be deployed, like process arguments, selectively. (Similarly, arguments about whether baseball should just judge what’s on the field and not being concerned with what’s off the field can easily see opposite positions from the same people when the subject changes from drug to domestic violence accusations.)
Of course people should note that “everyone was using PEDs” makes Bonds still just as impressive, considering how much he lapped everyone else. To discount Bonds, you really have to make a “only a few people were getting benefits for PEDs” argument. At the same time, Judge is really impressive for this era, impressions of Three True Outcomes or no.
A lot of people instinctively want to tear down one or the other (or Ruth), because arguments are marshaled on behalf of affinities we already have.
Bonds could have been a top 10 all time player without steroids. The fact that he used steroids to put up such broken numbers is… grotesque, in my view. Sammy Sosa was nobody special without steroids, but Bonds didn’t need them to be great.
Bonds essentially had Mike Trout’s career to date…THEN started using steroids.
Good thing he has 1st or 2nd for most of the year. IN 1984, he would have hit like 4th
Maybe my favorite aspect is this season can be looked at as a breakout of sorts and should make it such an easy call to extend him. Increased certainty and surplus Values, already high and most Valued by our lords above, should close any of the gaps the Yankees said were there