Another Year of the Jered Weaver Experiment
At this point it’s safe to call it a spring tradition: Eyebrows get raised in response to Jered Weaver’s underwhelming velocity, and Weaver tells the media he doesn’t care. There’s nothing wrong with Weaver’s reaction, because he is more of a command pitcher, and he knows he’ll be fine if he locates. I’m sure he’s beyond tired of this repeating conversation. But from the outside, it’s significant that Weaver’s fastball continues to surprise, because it just keeps getting slower, more quickly than it probably ought to. The public is velocity-obsessed, yeah. That doesn’t mean this doesn’t warrant attention:
The league-average fastball has gotten harder over time. You know that. But while we expect velocity to decline for pitchers as they age, Weaver’s curve has gotten weird. He lost more than a mile between 2011 and 2012. He lost more than a mile again between 2012 and 2013. And then last year, he lost three miles. He lost even more after returning from a DL stint. This isn’t the kind of thing people just shrug off. This is kind of a big deal, whether Weaver wants to admit it or not.
Now there’s another season coming. Weaver is a healthy member of the Angels rotation. The league will probably continue to throw harder, and based on recent historical trends, we might expect its average at about 91.9 mph. As for Weaver? Weaver isn’t going to average that.
Pedro Moura was watching Weaver in a spring game a week ago:
Jered Weaver did not throw a pitch faster than 83 mph in his first spring inning, but he did strike out Dexter Fowler and Jason Heyward, so.
You Aren't a FanGraphs MemberIt looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:✓Ad-free browsing✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles✓Historical & platoon projections✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps✓One-click data exports✓Customizable player-page dashboards✓Dark & Classic site modes✓Weekly Members-only mailbag✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review✓Optional homepage photo removal✓Gift articles to non-members— Pedro Moura (@pedromoura) March 4, 2016
Then Weaver pitched again Wednesday. I understand it’s still spring training. But:
One scout in attendance has Jered Weaver topping out at 80 mph in two innings today. He threw a 78-mph fastball Austin Barnes hit for a HR.
— Pedro Moura (@pedromoura) March 9, 2016
In his last inning, Weaver worked all the way up to 81. If we were to take this as his ability now, we’re looking at yet another velocity drop, and a fairly big one, for a pitcher who seemingly didn’t have much left to lose. This is what happened with the first batter of Weaver’s afternoon:
And here’s that pitch that was clocked at 78:
What we had last year was a Jered Weaver whose fastball averaged 83.3. It was down from that in the second half. What we might have now is a Jered Weaver whose fastball averages 80 or 81. Maybe he’ll work up from this a little bit, who knows, but it would kind of fit the trend. And as you recognize, this has gotten extreme. I’ve prepared a table below, after looking at starting pitchers since 2002. I didn’t establish an innings minimum — I wanted to capture everybody. I did take the step of eliminating knuckleballers, but what you see here are the 10 slowest fastballs, relative to the league-average fastball for a starter.
| Pitcher | Season | FB (mph) | League FB (mph) | %League | Hand |
| Jamie Moyer | 2012 | 78.6 | 91.0 | 86.4% | L |
| Jamie Moyer | 2010 | 80.9 | 90.7 | 89.2% | L |
| Lenny DiNardo | 2006 | 80.5 | 90.0 | 89.4% | L |
| Jamie Moyer | 2009 | 81.3 | 90.8 | 89.5% | L |
| Jamie Moyer | 2008 | 81.2 | 90.3 | 89.9% | L |
| Jamie Moyer | 2007 | 81.1 | 89.8 | 90.3% | L |
| Chris Michalak | 2006 | 81.4 | 90.0 | 90.4% | L |
| Jamie Moyer | 2006 | 81.7 | 90.0 | 90.8% | L |
| Jered Weaver | 2015 | 83.3 | 91.7 | 90.8% | R |
| Tom Glavine | 2008 | 82.1 | 90.3 | 90.9% | L |
Last year’s Weaver shows up in ninth, basically tied with 2006 Jamie Moyer. Last year’s Weaver threw a fastball that was just under 91% as fast as the league-average fastball for a starter. You’ll notice that Weaver is the only righty in the group. Not that you needed to be told he has an unusual profile, but, anyway. Think now about his potential new average, compared to the estimated 2016 league average of 91.9. If Weaver averages 83, that would put him at 90.3%. If Weaver averages 82, that would put him at 89.2%. And if Weaver averages 81, that would put him at 88.1%.
In short: there’s a real, legitimate chance 2016 Weaver ends up in second place on this list. First place is occupied by a 49-year-old who was coming off Tommy John surgery. Jered Weaver’s velocity loss is seemingly unstoppable, and it’s carried him into a most unfamiliar place.
Yet as Weaver would be delighted to remind you, velocity isn’t the endgame. He’s not out there to try to throw as hard as he can. He’s out there to try to prevent runs from scoring. Granted, a season ago, he had problems in that department, and it’s not difficult to speculate why. The spring outing on Wednesday was a disaster. But Weaver now is something of an experimental pitcher, and we get to watch him and try to track just how slow you can throw and still succeed. It might not be fun and relaxing for the Angels and their fans, but it’s good for our collective curiosity. Moyer, obviously, exceeded expectations for something like two decades. He can be kind of a template, but now we have a righty, who’s a shell of what he once was.
There were plenty of negative signs from Weaver’s 2015. He had a career-low strikeout rate, and a career-high ERA. Batters pulled the ball almost half the time they hit it. By run value, Weaver nearly had the least-valuable fastball in the game, and that shouldn’t be a surprise. Yet it wasn’t all bad. Weaver’s other pitches were all in positive territory. Down the stretch, he tried to phase the fastball out, throwing it barely 40% of the time. Weaver, overall, still allowed weaker contact than average. He threw more than enough strikes. And perhaps importantly, Weaver managed to allow about the same rate of contact as he did in 2012, when he finished third in Cy Young voting. Weaver didn’t become super hittable, by that measure, and he’d already lost several ticks. What might happen if he loses some more?
I genuinely don’t know the answer. I think I know the answer — my brain is trying to tell me Weaver is going to suck. Because he most recently sucked, and now he appears to be worse. But I want to make sure I’m not selling Weaver short, because he’s smart enough to adapt, and he has a full repertoire. He can still change looks and speeds, and I don’t want to pretend like I know where the lower threshold is for big-league velocity. That’s what kept getting Moyer skeptics in trouble, and this is why Weaver is so interesting. It seems like he’s doomed, but he’s not necessarily doomed, and the Angels are going to give him ample chances to show he can still pitch. This is going to be a learning experience. We don’t get these opportunities often at all, with every team in baseball searching for heat. The Angels aren’t here because they want to be, but their reality is our reality.
Jered Weaver is about to be one of the slowest-throwing starters in recent memory. He doesn’t have a knuckleball, and his favored arm is the right one. Weaver would tell you this stuff isn’t important, as long as he has his command. I don’t even know if he knows whether he’s to be trusted.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
Weaver makes Barry Zito look like a flame thrower.
Haven’t I read somewhere — maybe in a piece about Mark Buehrle — that the slower the fastball is from league average the more success it has? Batters are geared for 91 and they can be flummoxed by 81. That is counter-intuitive, certainly.
There might be something to that, but there’s a ton of selection bias going on. A pitcher who throws below league average will have to have developed ways to make it work against advanced hitters – command, movement, etc. – much more than a pitcher who is at or above. Guys who throw hard but don’t have the results will be trusted much longer than a guy who throws slower, so the only ones who fit into that category have made up for the lack of velocity enough they can’t be left out.
As much as we were all rooting for Jamie Moyer in 2012, Moyer was pretty bad, despite being the definition of “crafty”. If that’s the territory Weaver is entering, good luck…I think he’s going to get shelled
Jeff, question. Suppose Weaver was a FA this past offseason. Would he have even gotten a ML contract, based on 2015? I think not, but wondering your take.
I think his situation would be kind of similar to Lincecum’s. So we’ll see what he signs for!
Sullivan was too kind to not link to his own Twitter feed, but he had some gems for Jered Weaver-related velocity problems last night. You’ll laugh, a lot.
https://twitter.com/based_ball
My favorite:
“Jered Weaver always gets extra defensive support behind him because he gets to be his own catcher”
That was great.
“one of my biggest pet peeves is when I’m walking down the sidewalk and I get stuck behind a group of Jered Weaver fastballs”
So a quick look at qualified pitchers last year, only 5 had a change up slower than 80 mph on average last year.
The question is, do the Angels have realistic options if Weaver is awful and needs to be removed from the rotation?
I agree this will be a fun experiment–but depending how short the leash is, it might be a fairly short experiment.
The problem is exacerbated by having one of the worst farm systems in the league. There is enough to suggest that Nick Tropeano or Andrew Heaney can take another step forward, though.