Aramis Ramirez Completes Milwaukee’s Left Side
Last season, it was a common point of view that Yuniesky Betancourt and the Brewers’ massive weakness at shortstop would be the doom for Milwaukee’s bid at competitiveness. As bad as Betancourt was, the real reason the Brewers needed a 22-3 stretch in August to overtake the St. Louis Cardinals for the National League Central crown was the struggles of Casey McGehee at third. McGehee put up an atrocious .223/.280/.346 line — a 68 wRC+ — and was eventually replaced by Jerry Hairston Jr. come the playoffs.
The Brewers moved earlier to fill their need at shortstop, signing Alex Gonzalez to a one-year deal with a vesting option. Today, the Brewers completed the left side of their 2012 infield, adding Aramis Ramirez on a three-year deal worth somewhere between $34 million and $37 million — that is, you the readers were pretty dang close.
Ramirez provides production from the plate the Brewers sorely missed at premium positions (other than second base) last season. The Brewers finished with a below-average position-adjusted OPS+ (sOPS+) at shortstop, center field, catcher and, of course, third base last season. Third base was the disaster — the other positions at least finished above 90. Thanks largely to McGehee, Brewers third basemen only produced 70% of the offense the rest of the league managed from the position.
| Split | sOPS+ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| as LF | .325 | .392 | .581 | .973 | 165 |
| as 1B | .291 | .407 | .552 | .960 | 140 |
| as RF | .278 | .346 | .485 | .831 | 111 |
| as DH | .289 | .289 | .526 | .816 | 109 |
| as 2B | .257 | .335 | .397 | .732 | 107 |
| as C | .256 | .306 | .389 | .696 | 98 |
| as CF | .265 | .318 | .396 | .714 | 94 |
| as SS | .256 | .277 | .395 | .672 | 91 |
| as 3B | .215 | .275 | .324 | .598 | 70 |
Ramirez promises to plug this offensive hole quite well. Even in his down year in 2010, when he limped to a .245 BABIP, he still finished with a 92 wRC+. Every other season since 2004, Ramirez has managed at least a 120 wRC+, making him one of the best hitters at the position over that period. Only Alex Rodriguez, Chipper Jones, David Wright, Evan Longoria, and Kevin Youkilis have better bats over the past eight seasons as measured by wRC+.
On defense, it will be more of the same for the Brewers — bad. Ramirez developed the nickname “E5” early in his career with the Pirates, and although he has since ceded that moniker to Edwin Encarnacion, little has changed with his ability. Ramirez ranks poorly no matter which defensive metric you look at, and he similarly fails the eye test. McGehee did grade out as a +7 UZR last season, but that was coming off two years of a combined -12. Having watched him quite often over the past three years, I must say I did not see too much different in 2011 from the rough sailing of 2009 and 2010.
Still, even with the defense factored in, Ramirez should be a major upgrade at third base, with his bat creating a potential 3.0-3.5 wins above replacement. Whether or not the Brewers “win” this deal will hinge on Ramirez’ health and longevity. With Ramirez turning 34 in 2012 and coming off an 89-game season in 2010, the deal could become a lemon as early as 2013, and Ramirez’ age-36 season in 2014 is a complete wild card. The Brewers appear more than willing to take that risk for the major short-term upgrade, however, and a 2012 replication of his 2011 season alone could validate the contract.
Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.
Who is worse at 3B, Gamel or Ramirez? Maybe Ramirez can play first.
From what I hear Gamel has historically bad defense at 3b whereas Ramirez is simply a bad to very bad.
fWAR the past three years.
A.Ramirez +6.2
C.McGehee +5.6
5-4-3, three year weighted.
A.Ramirez: +2.18 (1475 PA)
C.McGehee: +1.78 (1668 PA)
^Thanks be to 2011 UZR, the only thing that kept McGehee’s WAR above 0 last year despite DRS rating him 2 runs below average.
If McGehee is a better defender, it’s not by very much. It certainly isn’t enough to offset the offensive differential in a crucial season for the brewers, whose all-in window will soon close.
McGehee always failed the eye test at 3B. He looked sure handed but had terrible range and an average at best arm. I like this deal because next year is extremely important considering the Brewers’ window of contention, and Ramirez will be a huge upgrade at 3B next year.
“and coming off an 89-game season in 2010”, he played 124 games in 2010.
Unbelievable! He played in 213 games in 2010 and 2010!
Cub fans have been telling Ramirez not to let the door hit him in the you-know-what on the way out, due to his 1) poor defense, 2) selfish attitude, and 3)
disappearing act when the games counted (eg post-season: 41 AB, .171/.244/.292 and I’m sure some enterprising poster will come up with first half/second half splits). As a Cub fan I won’t be sorry to see him go, but I do wonder where the offense will come from. Between him and Carlos Pena we’re losing 173 RBI and 54HR – not sure David DeJesus and Ian Sewart are going to make up that deficit even if you add in runs saved by their superior defense.
You mean he was a poor performer in ALL 41 postseason at-bats?
If you take out the ones where he hit that .171, he didn’t hit AT ALL.
No, but he did draw some walks.
Ramirez defense really isn’t much of an issue if he plays first base instead of third and Green takes over at third. I’m not sure if that’s what they have in mind but I think that could work. Or have Green play first, whatever works…
Gamel is a possibility at first obviously. From what it sounds like he’ll need a huge attitude adjustment if he want to see consistent playing time. And not showing up to training camp overweight would help.
Doug Melvin Says:
Ramirez starts at 3B… Taylor Green covers his off days, is an insurance policy for Ramirez getting injured and insurance for Gamel sucking at 1B.
IIRC, Gamels big issue at 3B was that he has an inaccurate arm.
I thought he was always discussed as a possible 1B replacement for Fielder.
I like the move for MIL in that it gives them some value and flexibility at the corners. The concern is that any time he dives at 3B that he re-injures his shoulder. If he plays 1B maybe he stays more rested throughout the season.
I’m surprised this article hasn’t been updated with the details of Aramis’ contract. He’ll make only $6 million in 2012, $10 million in 2013 and $14 million in 2014 ($6 million of which is deferred). There’s also a $4 million buyout on a mutual option for 2015.
(Source: http://mlbbuzz.yardbarker.com/blog/mlbbuzz/brewers_considered_four_year_deal_for_rollins/8703901?new_post=true)
Not that this changes any of the analysis above, with which I agree. But that lowly $6 million for next season is pretty remarkable. Aramis should provide value far exceeding that amount as long as he doesn’t repeat his dreadful 2010 campaign.
It surprises me to see no one mention the change in parks when it comes to Aramis Ramirez, unless I missed it. He’s been loving Wrigley.
Over the last 5 years (and appx 1350 PA for each Home/Away):
Home wOBA .419 vs Away wOBA .323
Home wRC+ 155 vs Away wRC+ 91
Are the Brewers really getting the offense everyone thinks they’re getting?