As the (Aaron) Crow Flies

While perusing the Royals’ organizational chart the other day, I realized that it’s been quite some time since I’ve heard anything about Aaron Crow. The right-hander, you’ll recall, was the ninth overall pick by the Washington Nationals during the 2008 draft.

Stepping back into 2008 again, the Top 2 pitchers in the draft that year were Crow and Brian Matusz of the University of San Diego. Here is what Baseball American said about Crow before the ’08 amateur draft:

In three years, Crow has gone from an undrafted high school senior to the best righthander in the 2008 draft, thanks largely to the best fastball package available. Other pitchers may throw harder, but no one can match the combination of Crow’s velocity (92-96 mph with a peak of 98), hard sink, command and ability to maintain his fastball… Some teams wonder if his mechanics and size (generously listed at 6-foot-3 and 195 pounds) might make him more of a closer than a front-line starter. Crow led the Cape Cod League with a 0.67 ERA last summer and was the No. 1 prospect in the league.

And here is a little something on Matusz:

Like David Price, the No. 1 pick last year, Matusz is tall and lanky at 6-foot-5 and 200 pounds, and scouts have history with him. He didn’t sign with the Angels in 2005 as a fourth-round pick out of an Arizona high school, and he starred for Team USA last summer, after ranking second (behind Price) in the nation in strikeouts… Matusz profiles as a middle of the rotation starter at worst, and if he improves his fastball and mechanics, he can become a staff ace.

There was a lot of debate over who was the better pick but it appears that Baltimore made the smart decision to take the more advanced left-hander. While Crow is struggling in double-A, Matusz is holding his own at the MLB level and has 15 MLB starts under his belt with a career xFIP of 4.58.

Unable to come to terms with Washington in ’08, Crow re-entered the draft in ’09 and went 12th overall to the Royals. He didn’t sign until late in the year so the former University of Missouri star officially began his pro career in April, 2010.

In the first start of his career, Crow allowed just one unearned run in 4.2 innings. His subsequent double-A starts have been inconsistent. His best stretch came in two games on April 29 and May 4 when he allowed just five runs on 12 hits in 15.0 innings. He walked three and struck out nine. In his last start against Tulsa (Colorado) on May 9, Crow was touched up for seven runs on seven hits and four walks in 5.0 runs. He did not strike out a batter.

Overall, he’s allowed 43 hits in 41.2 innings. Crow has given up 17 walks with just 21 strikeouts. Despite an excellent ground-ball rate of 70%, Crow has given up six homers (1.20 HR/9). If he keeps up that ground-ball rate, he should have some success, but he’s not going to reach his ceiling of a No. 1 or 2 starter with a sub-5.00 strikeout rate. It’s still early to get too worried, but flashes of Luke Hochevar are dancing in my head; one under-performing former No. 1 draft pick in enough for the Royals organization.





Marc Hulet has been writing at FanGraphs since 2008. His work focuses on prospects and fantasy. Follow him on Twitter @marchulet.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A DC Wonk
13 years ago

And us DC fans — at this point at least — are extremely grateful that Crow’s salary and other demands led to the Nats not signing him! Extremely!

Why?

Because the Nats got a compensation 1st-round-10th pick in 2009, and used it to pick Drew Storen, who signed the day after the draft (because he couldn’t wait to get to the bigs, and wanted to get started rightaway), and has had terrific success. (He’s “the other” 1st round pick of the Nats — and was promoted to AAA a few days before Stasburg was. He’s continued his success in AAA).

Expect both Strasburg and Storen to get promoted in June. (A much better outcome than had the Nats signed Crow)

KG
13 years ago
Reply to  A DC Wonk

I always like players that sign immediately; it really shows a desire to play. If I remember right, Jared Mitchell, drafted by the White Sox in 2009, did the same thing. I think it’s quite indicative of a player’s attitude. Tim Beckham did too, I think, and though he hasn’t lived up to his potential yet, I still look upon him fondly, a bit thanks to the quick signing.

Still think Crow would look better in a Nats uniform than Storen, as they need all the starting pitching they can get. Strasburg can’t pitch every day.

Zack
13 years ago
Reply to  KG

Storen, for as good as a talent as he is, is a reliever, and the Nats used the 10th overall pick on him. And I get it, that pick was unprotected and needed someone they knew was going to sign.

And you can’t use the sign date to determine a guy’s desire to play- MLB often wants teams to hold off on annoncement of over-slot contracts because they dont want it to affect other slots.

e3
13 years ago
Reply to  KG

Actually, the Nats are fairly stacked at starter. Livan , Olson and Atilano have been pitching very well. Lannen is an established starter and Stamman’s been fine, if inconsistent. Then there’s Strasburg (a shoo-in), Wang and Marquis (both coming back from injuries, but both proven starters), Detwiler and Zimmermann (also coming back from injuries, but both very good prior to going down). There are also a few in the minors (e.g. Chico, Martin) who could easily fill out a rotation. Where they are definitely in need is in the relief corps (Capps and Clip and a bunch of questions marks who sometimes show up and sometimes don’t). Storen would actually fill a more immediate need than Strasburg.

TCQ
13 years ago
Reply to  KG

Translating for a certain someone being high on a hot start…

Livan sucks. Olsen is bouncing back to a younger form nicely, best pitcher on the staff. Atilano sucks. Lannen sucks.

The Nationals need all the starting they can possibly get, in other words.

e3
13 years ago
Reply to  KG

Truly eloquent retort, TCQ. You must be a Phillies fan. But the stats for Livan (4-1 1.04 ERA over 6 starts and 43.1 innings), Atilano 3-0 (3.57 ERA in 4 starts over 22.2) and Lannon (lousy this year with an injury, but ERAs of 3.91 and 3.88 over the last two full seasons) don’t lie. I’ll take that kind of sucking any day.

Zack
13 years ago
Reply to  KG

“I’ll take that kind of sucking any day.”

That’s not the point. I think everyone admits their guys have gotten off to hot starts. But over 32 starts, Livan Hernandez sucks, and Scott Olsen hasnt had a FIP below 5 since his first year. Atilano has 12 BBs compared to 11 Ks so far- keep that up and yes he will “suck” too.

Reuben
13 years ago
Reply to  KG

not sure why he’s arguing for livan, olsen, and atilano when he’s got strasbourg, zimmerman, detwiler, and wang right there. the nats staff, fully healthy, won’t be the best in the NL, but it might be in the top 1/2. they could use some OF and 1B prospects as well as pitchers.