Atlanta Braves Top 30 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Atlanta Braves. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as our own observations. This is the third year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJ Smith-Shawver | 20.4 | A+ | SP | 2025 | 45+ |
| 2 | JR Ritchie | 19.8 | A | SP | 2026 | 45+ |
| 3 | Dylan Dodd | 24.9 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 45 |
| 4 | Spencer Schwellenbach | 22.9 | A | SP | 2025 | 45 |
| 5 | Jared Shuster | 24.7 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 45 |
| 6 | Owen Murphy | 19.6 | A | SP | 2026 | 45 |
| 7 | Luis Guanipa | 17.3 | R | CF | 2027 | 45 |
| 8 | Roddery Muñoz | 23.0 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40+ |
| 9 | Ignacio Alvarez | 20.0 | A+ | 3B | 2025 | 40+ |
| 10 | Diego Benitez | 18.4 | R | 3B | 2027 | 40+ |
| 11 | Adam Maier | 21.4 | R | SP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 12 | Darius Vines | 25.0 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 40 |
| 13 | Victor Vodnik | 23.5 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 14 | Cody Milligan | 24.3 | AA | CF | 2024 | 40 |
| 15 | Luke Waddell | 24.8 | AAA | 2B | 2024 | 40 |
| 16 | Geraldo Quintero | 21.5 | A+ | 2B | 2025 | 40 |
| 17 | Drake Baldwin | 22.1 | A+ | C | 2026 | 40 |
| 18 | Braden Shewmake | 25.4 | AAA | SS | 2023 | 40 |
| 19 | Brooks Wilson | 27.1 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 20 | Blake Burkhalter | 22.6 | A | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 21 | Kevin Kilpatrick Jr. | 22.4 | A+ | CF | 2026 | 40 |
| 22 | Cole Phillips | 19.9 | R | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 23 | Douglas Glod | 18.2 | R | CF | 2027 | 35+ |
| 24 | Adam Zebrowski | 22.6 | A+ | C | 2025 | 35+ |
| 25 | Tyler Collins | 20.1 | A | CF | 2026 | 35+ |
| 26 | Ambioris Tavarez | 19.4 | A | SS | 2026 | 35+ |
| 27 | Seth Keller | 18.9 | A | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 28 | David McCabe | 23.1 | A | 3B | 2027 | 35+ |
| 29 | Jesse Franklin V | 24.4 | AA | LF | 2024 | 35+ |
| 30 | Austin Smith | 23.8 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Catching Depth
Javier Valdes, C
Tyler Tolve, C
Both of these guys are well-built and bring one offensive tool to the table (Valdes has above-average feel for contact, Tolve has big power), but both are pretty rough behind the dish. Valdes, 24, struggles with ball-blocking and controlling the running game. Tolve’s issues are less specific and apply more to his defense overall, and he may not make enough contact for the power to matter, but he’s only 22.
Young Players to Know
Luis Sanchez, 3B
Didier Fuentes, SP
Leiker Figueroa, INF
Adam Shoemaker, LHP
Sanchez, 19, is a compact third baseman who walked twice as often as he struck out in the 2022 DSL, then got some travel squad reps during the Grapefruit League. Boots on the ground scouts are describing him as more of a skills-over-tools type. Fuentes, 17, was sent to Low-A to start 2023. He is very flexible and athletic but looks to have some strength and conditioning work to do, which might help him find more consistent feel for his riding, low-90s fastball and inconsistent secondary stuff. Figueroa has above-average physical projection and bat-to-ball skills, but he’s not an especially twitchy athlete. Shoemaker is a 6-foot-6, 20-year-old Canadian lefty who had a velo spike before the 2021 draft and got about $500,000 in the 11th round. He’s dialed back down into the 89-92 mph range and is a late-blooming sleeper at this stage.
Spot Starters
Tanner Gordon, RHP
Allan Winans, RHP
Luis De Avila, LHP
Alan Rangel, RHP
Gordon, 25, commands 92-93 to the top of the zone and has an average breaking ball and changeup. Winans, 27, survives with a heavy sinker and above-average changeup. De Avila is the youngster of this group, just 21, but he’s relatively projectionless and is sitting just 90-92 mph. He has a shot to develop plus command of a plus changeup and be a 40. Rangel is similar to Gordon but with a grade less of command.
Bats on the Fringe
Cal Conley, 2B
Keshawn Ogans, SS
Brandon Parker, RF
Brandol Mezquita, RF
Conley is similar to Luke Waddell in that neither of them is sure-handed enough to play a big league shortstop, and maybe not the infield at all. Conley is different than Waddell in that he is a more balanced offensive player with average hit and power, both of which play down due to his approach. Ogans is almost the complete opposite, a slick infield defender who can play short but who probably won’t hit a ton. Parker has an interesting combination of power and patience, but he’s a corner-only guy and has been old for the level to which he’s been assigned, so we’re still skeptical. If he gets a quick hook to Double-A and keeps hitting, we’ll re-evaluate. Mezquita is a little more clearly short of hitting enough to profile in a corner because of his hit tool, though he does have an enticing bat speed/foot speed combination.
Relief Looks
Luis Vargas, RHP
Jared Johnson, RHP
Trey Riley, RHP
Vargas is an athletic, undersized 20-year-old righty who worked deep into games (at least, deep into games by 19-year-old standards) as a starter in 2022, but he looks more like a reliever. He sits 92 mph with ride and has a potential plus slider. Johnson, 22, is back from TJ and again sitting 93-94 with a pretty good slider and mixed strikes. Riley sits in the mid-to-upper-90s with natural cut, but he has zero feel for the zone.
System Overview
The overall quality of the Braves system is below average, but that’s largely due to the org’s “If you’re ready, you’re ready” approach to prospects. This philosophy rocketed Michael Harris II and Spencer Strider to the big leagues, exhausted Vaughn Grissom’s rookie eligibility, and has made Ian Anderson (who just underwent Tommy John surgery) a de facto prospect again as, like Kyle Wright before him, he struggles to find his long-term footing at the highest level.
This system has two clear chunks. The first is the high-ceiling pitching group concentrated mostly at the top of the list. The Braves tend to use draft resources on lots of “tip of the iceberg” prospects, where the context of the player’s evaluation inspires hope for future development. Among those are a number of former two-way players (Owen Murphy and Spencer Schwellenbach) or multi-sport athletes (AJ Smith-Shawver). Whether the affinity for these types of prospects stems from the multiple developmental routes they allow for, or simply comes from the Braves thinking it implies an additional level of athleticism, they sure are eager to scoop them up. The same is true of players whose draft stock was altered by injury. This applies to Strider, Schwellenbach, Cole Phillips, and Adam Maier. There are plenty of recent examples of hurlers whose early development was impacted by TJ and then went on to impress (Lucas Giolito, Jesús Luzardo, and Walker Buehler, to name a few), and the Braves seem to like to fish in that prospect pool.
The other common theme throughout the list is that of contact-driven up-the-middle guys, most of whom offer no power at all. This is particularly interesting considering the current big league shortstop situation. As the org navigates around it, it helps illuminate the Braves’ internal opinions of their large population of pop-free middle infielders. When Orlando Arcia was placed on the IL, Grissom was tapped as his stand-in, which may indicate where the org views Braden Shewmake fitting in the long run (and that it’s likely not at shortstop).
It may not be a sustainable model but “get 1-3 years out of an almost ready young pitcher” seems like an interesting model, and maybe a different model than “wait until you are near certain that someone will be around the middle of the rotation, and give promising young guys a shot in late inning relief towards the end of the season?” That second model may not be the dominant model but it feels like the current model for most playoff teams. The Braves seem way more willing to send guys- even pretty established guys- down instead of trading them.
I don’t think the Braves are intentionally following the model. Like, I doubt they wanted Soroka’s Achilles to betray him, no one wanted Anderson to suddenly lose his feel for his fastball and change-up, they were probably less than thrilled that Newcomb could never develop command, and it certainly wasn’t their intention for Foltynewicz to suddenly lose 7 tics off of his fastball, thus rendering him unusable as an MLB starter. Pitching is just volatile.
I also don’t think they want it… but I think the Braves follow through on an understanding that ANYTHING can happen to pitching, and it is indeed volatile. So, utilize it while it’s quality rather than trying to make it perfect, because if it breaks, you get zero value.
Thank you Eric and Tess, this is great stuff. Looks like they are rich in advanced pitchers with questionable fastballs but good secondaries; hopefully one or two pan out.
On their strategy of targeting young players whose development has been derailed by injury and who may be more affordable for that reason, you could also go back to Max Fried, who was acquired by trade, not through the draft. That one worked out pretty well.
So, after spending that past month arguing with my fantasy league that no, Owen Murphy is not our number 1 prospect just because he was our most recent first round selection, Its nice to see a website actually rank him appropriately.
Plus, I’ve been fanboying over Smith-Shawver for over a year now. He’s one of those high ceiling high volatility prospects that either breaks your heart or reminds you why you love watching these guys progress through the minors to future big league stars.
woof this system is in an ugly state
MLB team is NOT ugly though lol so that’s what matters.
All their good prospects are busy contributing to what’s widely viewed as the best (or at least among the best) big league roster in the game. Huge bummer.
Sure looks that way, doesn’t it. But, the Braves 2022 top prospect list also looked pretty rough. Then our top two guys went number 1 and number 2 in ROY voting. Prospect evaluation gets weird sometimes.
I’m guessing that if Vaughn Grissom and Bryce Elder had not (barely) exhausted rookie eligibility, then you’d have two guys at the top (maybe a 55 and a 50) that would make the list look a lot better.
And then of course there’s the fact that you have first, second, third, catcher, right, and center, along with a budding ace/CYA candidate, all in their 20s, all signed to reasonable deals for many years, and all between above average and MVP-candidate players.
Yeah, if you find a Braves fan who is pouting about the farm system, then you’ve found a person that refuses to be happy.
It looks that way but only because the Braves have shown that they have fully grasped the concept that “If you’re ready, you’re ready” is a very sound philosophy and, when combined with their brilliant way of maximizing value by signing these young stars to team friendly contracts throughout their prime years, has the team set to compete at the highest level for many years. Less forward thinking organizations would still have Harris, Strider and Grissom moving up the organizational system and, while the Braves system would look much better, the major league team would not have been the strong team they already are. Who in their right mind would rather have the Gwinnett Stripers be great at the expense of the Atlanta Braves? To insinuate that the Braves haven’t handled this very close to perfectly is foolish.
I am pretty confident that virtually any team’s fans would take this farm system in exchange for one of the top 5 current MLB rosters that is all something like 26 years old and under team control for the next 5 years. This is a team that will be one of the championship-co favorites for the next 5 years. And if anything, I am understating this.
I don’t think you’re understating, as even five years is a long time to look ahead, but it should be included that unlike some other teams that also look like they will be good for several years (like the Padres), there is very little assumed downside in the Braves’ contracts. They’re amazingly valuable now. And they basically end when that value goes away.
Riley and Olson turn 35 at the beginning of their last guaranteed years. But they are very good players and $22 million in 2029/2032 will probably be a normal 1-year deal for an average-ish veteran.
So at the risk of overthinking based on his majors performances and/or coming across as rude, I really don’t see how Shuster’s fastball has “sneaky utility”. Sure, velocity isn’t necessarily everything, but its vertical movement also isn’t great, and even though that doesn’t always mean a worse VAA (see Richard Lovelady), his is still worse than average. Maybe if he commanded it well or if the pitch had great horizontal movement I could see it, but the horizontal movement is pretty average-y, and the command of it was pretty rough in his appearances.
Very thankful for all your work, and I know it’s nitpicking one small point out of many, but on that one I genuinely don’t see what’s meant there.
I’m trying not to judge him too much based on his limited sample size in the majors to start the season. But, looking at his reference page, his fastball just looks like a below average MLB offering. I guess, he is a lefty and does hide the ball well with his short-arm delivery. Beyond that, its hard to see that fastball being a useful MLB pitch.
It was probably meant that it plays up because of his changeup.
That would be the ideal outcome yes. But, I’m not running on enough hopium to expect it as a likely outcome.
Elison Joseph needs some love.
FB 94-99 (though shaky command)
I think the slider flashes above average, but it obviously still needs work.
The brilliance of Alex Anthopoulos’s building of the Braves’ roster into what it is today is astounding. At this point the quality of the Braves’ farm system is the last thing that the front office needs to worry about. The signing of some many core players to contracts that control the prime years of these players careers dances circles around the very questionable deals that other teams have made which include huge dollar amounts for deeply declining years would be enough. Recognizing when players are ready and putting these men where they belong instead of following some worthless template that decrees a certain time must be wasted at each level is another example. The way the front office has been able to get value for busts is another. It is clear that the Braves saw very little in Christian Pache and shipped him off with Cusick and Estes and Langeliers for Olson is enough and while Langeliers may work out, even there, the Braves ended up with the better catcher in the proven Sean Murphy. It is so far ahead of the game that Mandead is furious over the moves that Anthopoulos has implemented, which is also a huge plus.
Is Manfred mad at the Braves/Anthopolous? I hadn’t heard that. I would have thought he’d at least like how they’re buying out free agent years at relatively modest prices.
No, he is not. But some of us Braves fans got a little bit of a persecution complex when MLB pulled the All Star game from us in 2021. And there is some lingering resentment from the fact that the Braves front office was playing stupid games with international free agents right at the time that Manfred felt he needed to really crack down on the process in a way that would disincentive the rest of the league. Combine these two events and some Braves fans are convinced that Manfred is out to get their team.
I’m a Braves fan and I thought the punishment was both severe and fit the crime, so I’m not that bitter. (The ring helps!) I do know a lot of bitter fellow fans, which mystifies me a bit.
Are you talking about the 2021 All-Star game or the punishment for what Coppolella did? .I think Manfred’s comments were directed at signing young players to long term contracts well before they they neared free agency. The Braves were first and now everybody realizes it is best way for a franchise to operate. I think it is great to have stars play the bulk of their career with one franchise and this is the way.
Why, if Manfred is a hack for the owners, would he oppose
long-term contracts that, when handled correctly. are very beneficial to the owners. If Bob Nutting is complaining then it must be good for the game.
No, he’s mostly mad at the Padres, who appear to have morphed into the Tigers franchise of the late Ilitch years but adjusted for inflation. He’s also mad at the Mets for spending too much in one year (but not because they’re handing out 12 year contracts like candy).
I believe it was Anthgopoulos who was the first to sign young stars to long term contracts well before they approached free agency. Not the tiny deals to the likes of Singleton, Kingery, White and a couple of others. I read Manfred’s response as an attack on the type of deals, Albies and Acuna were the first to get.
I’m pretty sure that this was due to the Padres offering long term deals that go through age 41. It is worth noting that there were a lot fewer objections when Julio Rodríguez and Fernando Tatis Jr signed super long deals, even though they were actually longer than the Machado and Bogaerts and Turner deals.
Manfred said yesterday that Major League Baseball was seeking to put a limit on the length of contracts and the MLBPA responded by saying that the union would oppose any attempt to place such a restriction on negotiations.
It’s interesting that the Braves are so heavily invested in the 2-way players becoming pitchers angle because it’s not like that’s where their good pitchers have really come from. Strider was a guy who pitched at Clemson; Kyle Wright pitched at Vanderbilt; Bryce Elder pitched at Texas.. You can’t really call either one late-blooming. Max Fried came via trade; Charlie Morton came via free agency. It’s not a bad idea but it’s not like this is how they built the current team either.
I mean, they are no longer selecting in the top 5 of each round of the draft and they are no longer sellers at the trade deadline. So, it makes sense that the strategy would be different now from when they acquired Fried, Wright, and Anderson (Elder and Strider were both late round pick lottery tickets that just payed out beyond anyone’s expectations)
Also interesting that they also went the other way with Austin Riley (most teams preferred him as a pitcher) and Michael Harris II (two way player in HS)
And arguably Schwellenbach; this write up here seems a bit like revisionist history.
Was hoping to see Maximo Maria in the prospects of note section.