Atlanta Braves Top 33 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Atlanta Braves. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the sixth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JR Ritchie | 22.7 | AAA | SP | 2026 | 50 |
| 2 | Didier Fuentes | 20.7 | MLB | SP | 2026 | 50 |
| 3 | Cam Caminiti | 19.6 | A | SP | 2028 | 45+ |
| 4 | Owen Murphy | 22.5 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 45+ |
| 5 | Alex Lodise | 22.0 | A+ | SS | 2028 | 45 |
| 6 | Garrett Baumann | 21.6 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 45 |
| 7 | Luke Sinnard | 23.4 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 45 |
| 8 | Diego Tornes | 17.7 | R | LF | 2030 | 45 |
| 9 | John Gil | 19.8 | AA | SS | 2028 | 40+ |
| 10 | Tate Southisene | 19.4 | A | SS | 2029 | 40+ |
| 11 | Briggs McKenzie | 19.4 | R | SP | 2029 | 40+ |
| 12 | Owen Carey | 19.6 | A | CF | 2028 | 40+ |
| 13 | Conor Essenburg | 19.5 | R | CF | 2030 | 40+ |
| 14 | Edelson Cabral | 16.7 | R | SS | 2032 | 40+ |
| 15 | Raudy Reyes | 17.5 | R | SIRP | 2031 | 40 |
| 16 | Eric Hartman | 19.7 | A | CF | 2028 | 40 |
| 17 | Blake Burkhalter | 25.5 | AAA | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 18 | Rolddy Muñoz | 25.9 | MLB | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 19 | Carter Holton | 23.5 | A | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 20 | Luis Guanipa | 20.2 | A | CF | 2027 | 40 |
| 21 | Landon Beidelschies | 21.9 | A | SP | 2028 | 40 |
| 22 | Lucas Braun | 24.5 | AAA | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 23 | Drue Hackenberg | 23.9 | AAA | SP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 24 | Ethan Bagwell | 20.0 | A | SP | 2029 | 35+ |
| 25 | Hayden Harris | 27.0 | MLB | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 26 | Herick Hernandez | 22.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2028 | 35+ |
| 27 | Angel Carmona | 18.4 | R | SS | 2030 | 35+ |
| 28 | Brett Sears | 25.9 | AAA | SP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 29 | Cade Kuehler | 23.8 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 30 | Jose Perdomo | 19.5 | R | 3B | 2030 | 35+ |
| 31 | Connor Thomas | 27.8 | MLB | MIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 32 | Jose Manon | 17.2 | R | SS | 2032 | 35+ |
| 33 | Starlyn De La Cruz | 17.4 | R | CF | 2032 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
DSL Crew
Dayner Matos, RHP
Yoelvis Betancourt, C
Michael Martinez, OF
Juan Mateo, INF
Mario Baez, SS
The Braves have spent big on their top international signees in recent years, which has left them thin on the complexes, even though they only have one DSL squad. Matos was already 21 when he debuted and pitched well out of the rotation in the DSL. He’s a good athlete, up to 96, and can spin a breaking ball. Betancourt makes a ton of contact and, at least on the grainy videos available to me, is posting pop times in the low 1.90s. He’s on the small side for the position. Martinez has projectable power and hit his way from the DSL complex to Florida last year. Mateo has a utility infielder’s ceiling, but questions about everything from his fit at shortstop and his arm strength projection to his ability to cover the outer half of the plate leave too many things up in the air for the main section of the list. Baez performed in the DSL back in 2023 and he remains an interesting athlete, but after flirting with the Mendoza Line again, he’s going to need a junior year in the FCL.
Reliever Battery
Cedric De Grandpre, RHP
Jhancarlos Lara, RHP
Jeremy Reyes, RHP
Elison Joseph, RHP
Anderson Pilar, RHP
Austin Pope, RHP
Blane Abeyta, RHP
Rayven Antonio, RHP
De Grandpre missed all of 2024 recovering from Tommy John surgery and was erratic in his return. He has average arm strength or a tick more, but the fastball plays down due to its shape. He’ll flash a plus slider, and there’s a chance everything clicks for him in relief. Lara has upper-90s heat and a slider that flashes above average, but he’s also very scattered and prone to leaving both offerings over the heart of the plate. A shift to relief didn’t help. The arm strength will always give him latent upside, but it’s 20 pitchability right now. Reyes had a good year out of Augusta’s rotation. He has a low slot and a mid-90s fastball, but he’s not a great athlete or strike-thrower and doesn’t yet have an average breaking ball.
Joseph is a stiff athlete with an upper-90s fastball and a slider that flashes plus. He walked more than a batter per inning in Double-A last year and is a threat to hit the bull at any time. A closer for Gigantes del Cibao in the Dominican Winter League, Pilar is a sinker/cutter/slider reliever with average command and stuff. The Braves must like him because they’re back to the well again after an unsuccessful Rule 5 attempt last year. Pope debuted with Arizona last September and signed a minor league deal. He has a bunch of average offerings and is projected for an up-down role here. Abeyta is an upper-level reliever with a good slider/cutter; his fastball has worked in the mid-minors, but it looks fringy. In addition to having the coolest name in the system, Antonio added three ticks to his fastball in 2025 and saw his strikeout rate nearly double year over year. All of his secondaries are below average and need work; the splitter looks like the most promising of the group.
Good Control, Light Stuff
Davis Polo, RHP
Luis Arestigueta, RHP
Ian Mejia, RHP
Polo is a projectable righty with a starter’s frame and command, and projectable secondaries. He has main section talent, but he strained his rotator cuff in August of 2024 and hasn’t appeared in a game since, so we’re sliding him down here until we see how everything looks on the field. Arestigueta has a starter’s delivery and shapely stuff, but he badly needs to get stronger. Mejia has plus control of a mostly fringy pitch mix and projects as a depth length arm. To my eye, his slider is on the 45/50 line, but it has played well for years and will play a key role if he exceeds this forecast.
Bench Bats
Dixon Williams, INF
Cody Miller, INF
David McCabe, INF
Patrick Clohisy, OF
Kevin Kilpatrick Jr., OF
Adam Zebrowski, C
Jim Jarvis, SS
Luke Waddell, INF
Williams signed for just shy of $500,000 last year. He has plus speed, a good approach, and a little versatility on the infield, but there isn’t much power, and his lack of contact, especially on spin, in his Low-A debut was a little concerning. If that improves, or he can become even more versatile defensively, you can see a potential roster fit. Miller, Atlanta’s third rounder last year, is a plus runner who has played shortstop and third base thus far. He hit for a ton of power as a junior at East Tennessee State, but likely won’t as a pro. To my eye, he’s had more of a bat wrap in his at-bats this spring, and the additional length doesn’t work well with his bat speed.
McCabe is a tweener, a corner infielder with a third baseman’s bat and a first baseman’s defensive abilities. Clohisy is a burner who stole 100 bases last year if you count his AFL stint. He’d have been an easier roster fit in the five-man bench era. Kilpatrick is a speedy center fielder who has long projected as a fourth or fifth outfielder, but the way he’s struggled at the plate in recent seasons suggests a fifth or sixth outfielder projection would be more appropriate. Zebrowski has plus power, and is a subpar, if playable, defensive catcher. Jarvis is a fundamentally sound shortstop defender with a light bat. Waddell gets the bat on everything (his 87% contact rate paced the system), but he’s a singles hitter and stretched at shortstop.
Tools, Shaky Feel to Hit
Isaiah Drake, CF
Ambioris Tavarez, SS
Nick Montgomery, C
Drake shortened his once unviable swing, and he’s now making an appropriate amount of contact. It’s still an odd swing, though, and I’m concerned about both the chippy bat path and his tendency to get off balance. He has a fourth outfielder’s ceiling, but I’m a little skeptical he’ll hit enough. Tavarez’s ability to play short helped him stay on scouts’ radar even while he was running untenable strikeout rates as a teenager. He’s still doing that, and this may not work even in an up-down capacity. Montgomery entered 2025 as a potential breakout catching prospect with projectable power and soft hands behind the plate, but he looked overmatched at the dish and struggled behind it. If anybody deserves the benefit of the doubt on a rough debut season, it’s a large-framed seven-figure high school catcher who skipped the complex despite limited showcase experience as an amateur; hopefully he can get back on track in 2026.
System Overview
Last week, we highlighted the Tigers as the most hitter-heavy system in the game; Atlanta is the opposite. There isn’t a safe bat in the entire system, and the upper levels in particular are almost entirely bereft of prospects at all. We saw the consequences last summer, when a run of injuries, underperformance, and Jurickson Profar’s suspension highlighted the org’s lack of upper-level depth and thrust glove-only backups into load-bearing starting roles. The seven-figure signings of Tate Southisene, Alex Lodise, and Conor Essenburg, as well as positive years for John Gil, Owen Carey, and Eric Hartman, signal that help is on the way, if not imminently.
A few factors explain why this is such a thin system. The Braves tend to promote guys quickly, they’re always drafting late, they only have one DSL team, and they’ve tended to sink most of their international bonus pool into a guy or two, all of which limits the club’s ability to accumulate minor league depth. And while injuries and pitching underperformance hit every farm, they perhaps bit Atlanta’s a little harder than most last year. Several arms toward the bottom of the main section are down relative to a season ago, which had a further deflationary effect.
The good news is that there are a lot of arrow-up pitchers toward the top of the group. Didier Fuentes rocketed to the big leagues, Owen Murphy is back healthy, and JR Ritchie and Garrett Baumann rode velo breakouts to increases in their FV grades. It’s a significant development because Atlanta’s big league rotation depth will be tested early.
One final thought: Three cheers for the amateur group finding a couple of relatively low-dollar projectable cold-weather prep bats. Carey and Hartman both fit the bill, and at a time when it’s harder than ever to get high schoolers to sign for less than seven figures, Atlanta went against the grain to conjure up a couple of prospects.
Brendan covers prospects and the minor leagues for FanGraphs. Previously he worked as a Pro Scout for the Pittsburgh Pirates.
It probably makes karmic sense that even though the international players that were released as part of the bonus pool sanctions didn’t turn into anything that the subsequent intl Braves players (Perdomo, Guanipa, Tavarez) have mostly been a black hole until now
Why? Because Coppy was obnoxious? It certainly can’t be because you believe he actually acted less ethically than the other 29 teams, right?
Just because I’m inclined to agree that what happened in the Coppy era wasn’t unique and has continued since, that doesn’t make me want to hand wave off stashing 16 year olds in hotel rooms to get around bonus pool rules
I’m not sure specifically what you’re talking about here, but while I agree that it was correct for MLB to not ignore what happened, and they faced penalties, my point is about “karmic” justice, which doesn’t seem like it should apply to the Braves over other teams simply because they were worse at hiding what they were doing.
Also, their sin was paying teenagers too much, right?
Like, they’d give a non-prospect $95k and most of it would go to a stud…but he’d get to keep a chunk for his troubles?
It’s not like Coppy was Jim Bowden.
While I think the 2028 ETA on Gil makes sense, if he has another good summer, with the Braves’ combo of aggressive promotion and vague plans at SS, he might clear that ETA by a good bit
yeah given their track record, he’ll already be starting at SS before he has time to get hyped as a prospect lol
Definitely the two exciting guys here are Sinnard and Gil.
I don’t really understand how Sinnard lasted until Round 3, and these sorts of guys who are especially tall sometimes pitch way better than their stuff because it’s coming from an unexpected angle.
And Gil potentially getting 60 raw is super exciting. If he sticks at shortstop and has 50 hit / 50 game power you’d have an everyday player for sure.
I’m guessing Tornes lost his “+” from the new evaluation that he may have to ditch the switch hitter moniker. And I do wonder how close he was to making a staff Pick-to-Click considering two of their scout sources named him on theirs.
Tornes is exciting. Only 17 and will be playing stateside for the first time this year. Player to watch for sure.
I don’t know much about stadiums in the DSL but is it weird that a guy with 50 raw at present hit zero homers in 150 PAs or whatever it was?
I’m looking at the stats from previous years and it does seem like there are guys who hit homers in the DSL, some of whom we might recognize (Emil Morales, Lázaro Montes, Junior Caminero), although obviously most of them we wouldn’t recognize.
I think the answer to the question of “should we be concerned about this” is probably “no, nothing anyone does at 16 or 17 is predictive” but then that does mean you shouldn’t be putting high grades on guys that young either. And of course if we do care about what happens there then it’s a red flag.
Fair point, and at this stage/age I more highly value the scouting reports or how many scouts a prospect may have in his corner.
I can’t remember which publication it is but there is some group that names the best underclass HS baseball players in the country, so guys who are 15 or 16. If you take a look at the ones from 10-12 years ago, virtually none of them turned into top prospects, much less top major leaguers.
Projecting out from someone in their mid teens is basically impossible. For this reason, the DSL is kind of in a similar world as HS showcases. Scouts are looking more at coordination, bat control, swing decisions, exit velocity, the frame to put on muscle without compromising mobility, stuff like that.
You definitely would rather see him get to some power in games than not, it is something to keep an eye on. But the guy is also 17, for all we know his first girlfriend just dumped him and he is miserable.
Just for fun, I took a look at the international signings from 2018. There are 37 names on The Board and I think the only ones who have become major leaguers are Noelvi Marte and Francisco Alvarez. In theory, Orelvis Martinez or Kevin Alcantara could still become MLB contributors. But Elly de la Cruz wasn’t on anyone’s radar at all…
It’s been the same story for several years now with this system. The positive is that while consistently having a lowly ranked system, the Braves have been able to regularly develop good big leaguers. The negative that I’ve observed is not having the ability to make trades. The best use of a deep system is trading those prospects for major leaguers. And the Braves system has just been too shallow to do that.
Trades in the Anthopolous era have basically only been blockbusters or scrap trades. Only really the Gausman deal was somewhere in the middle that I can remember
The Braves have traded for Sale, Olson, and Murphy, all while supposedly having a terrible farm system. I think when you are super aggressive in promotions, you don’t give enough time for some guys to become sought-after prospects, but they still might be sought-after big leaguers with 5+ years of team control which is often just as good if not better.
good point!
Sale was giftwrapped for them for a player the Braves had lost faith in and was a fv 45 when he graduated. He had a good first year in a small sample size was terrible in the bigs the next year quickly demoted to AAA got hot at AAA and Red Sox paid the Braves cash to take Sale. That was a masterpiece by AA. Gave up nothing got a Cy Young.
Sean Murphy involved two players from the Braves Kyle Murray who was a FV45 who was a replacement level pitcher in the bigs now playing overseas, and William Contreras who was a 45+, and he’s out produced Murphy since the trade. Looking at it process wise it was fine to give up two 45s for a proven catcher expect Murphy’s production collapsed in 2024 and 2025 after he posted a great first year with the Braves.
The Matt Olsen trade they gave up a boatload
Cristian Pache, Shea Langeliers, Ryan Cusick, and Joey Estes. Pache and Langeliers were top 100 guys Pache graduated as a Favor but Zips proved prescient. The two pitchers turned into depth guys and Langeliers took a while to develop.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/braves-acquire-matt-olson-as-freeman-replacement-in-blockbuster-swap/
The Murphy trade involved a couple of other depth pieces the Brewers ended up winning the trade by flipping Esteury Ruiz for Wilson Contreras and a couple of depth arms.
Overall I think the A’s should be happy with the Matt Olsen trade but kick themselves for buying the idea that Pache was a impact player. The warning signs were there. I’m sure a Eric Longenhagen and Kevin Goldstein kick themselves for being so high on Pache despite him struggling at the plate. Maybe he has a late breakout he’s a great defender and if he get up to leave average he would be a plus. Getting one impact player back for a player that they were not going to be able to sign long term is a win even if the other elements amounted to a hill of beans. Trades like that show the importance of getting more than one piece back.
& I’ll say the same thing I said when they did the Olson trade:
I’d prefer to pay the freight on Freeman plus kept Langeliers, Pache, etc than what they did, even though Pache didn’t work out.
Freeman plus Langeliers > Olson.
Freeman & Olson have been about the same value in 4 years. (Freeman is a little ahead, but, most of that was year 1)Freeman makes $5M more per year. Freeman is older, so going downhill some, but, only 2 years left vs 4 for Olson.
I’m quite confident that Gil will be a 50 FV next offseason.
Braves seem to think so too. The fact that he reached AA as a 19-year-old indicates that the org has a lot of confidence in him.
MIL: 309.5
DET: 291
NYM: 277.5
STL: 275
CLE: 268
LAD: 248
SEA: 241.5
CHWS: 197
TOR: 179.5
CIN: 174
AZ: 171
PHI: 158.5
LAA: 121
ATL: 114.5
How can you not pull for a guy literally named Raudy with a 100mph heater and 0 command? Hopefully by next year he achieves the platonic ideal of 80 grade FB/20 grade command
Is Connor Thomas the oldest player on any of these lists this year? I lost track of him after the Brewers waived him.
Not even top five. They had 29.4 year old Justin Hagenman on the Mets list.
Thank you, hadn’t checked that one out yet. Have to admire their persistence.
As a Sox fan i was looking into trade returns for Lenyn Sosa since Profar gor suspended. I could not find one single braves Batter in the top 50 that i liked. Maybe their pitching is better?