Andrew McCutchen Clearly Doesn’t Have His Swing
It’s easy to consider over- and underachieving players in isolation. It’s only a little bit harder to put them in context. Below is some context. I exported a spreadsheet of every qualified position player on the season. Then I exported a spreadsheet of all our preseason projections, and I compared the two, looking at actual vs. projected WAR over however many trips to the plate each given player has had. Which players have underachieved expectations the most? Here are 10 names:
Player | Actual WAR | Projected WAR | Difference |
Prince Fielder | -1.8 | 0.6 | -2.4 |
Andrew McCutchen | 0.4 | 2.6 | -2.2 |
Giancarlo Stanton | 0.2 | 2.3 | -2.1 |
Justin Upton | -0.2 | 1.6 | -1.8 |
Alcides Escobar | -0.8 | 0.8 | -1.6 |
Jose Abreu | -0.2 | 1.4 | -1.6 |
Adam Jones | 0.0 | 1.5 | -1.5 |
Joey Votto | 0.8 | 2.2 | -1.4 |
Adrian Gonzalez | -0.2 | 1.2 | -1.4 |
Hanley Ramirez | -0.1 | 1.3 | -1.4 |
Prince Fielder is off his expected pace by about two and a half wins, which is absurd and terrible. Not that the Rangers have even really needed his help. But Fielder isn’t the only struggling star player, and right there in second is Andrew McCutchen, whom the Pirates could dearly use. He’s about tied with Giancarlo Stanton, who’s got his own problems, but let’s focus on one player at a time. McCutchen, by now, was supposed to be almost a three-win player. He hasn’t been close to a one-win player, and as he’s sunk, so has the team around him.
The Pirates have a whole lot of issues, sure. And the outfield as a whole has still been productive. Lower-budget teams, however, need their star players to be star players, and McCutchen hasn’t been a star player. It’s because he doesn’t have his swing.