Bargain Hunting at the Trade Deadline

With the trade deadline now eight days away, most of the trade speculation has centered around a few big name players. Johnny Cueto, Cole Hamels, Jeff Samardzija, and Scott Kazmir were the primary pitching targets for contenders looking to upgrade their rotation, and David Price might end up in that mix too. The hitting class is a lot weaker, but Justin Upton’s name continues to float out there, and Ben Zobrist is probably available to a team who wants a do-everything guy instead of just a bat. But if you want any of those guys, they aren’t going to come cheap, and there is going to be a lot of competition for their services.

But while I still think this remains a seller’s market — though to a lesser degree than it was a month ago — I do think there are some potential values to be had for teams that are willing to shop in the mid-tier instead. To that end, here are the three players I’d be aggressively targeting this month, given their expected production and my sense of what I think they’ll cost, relative to the big name guys.


Carlos Gomez, OF, Milwaukee
.270/.336/.437, 113 wRC+, +1.9 WAR
Rest of Season Projection: +1.8 WAR

While most of the big names available right now are pitchers, our depth chart forecasts think Carlos Gomez might actually be the most valuable player moved over the next week; in fact, his projected value over the rest of the regular season is higher than all but eight pitchers in baseball, and among the potentially available pitchers, only David Price is in that group. You could make a case that the ability to give a higher proportion of innings to your best pitchers in October puts Cueto and Hamels slightly ahead of him as well, but Gomez is in that tier in terms of overall value.

Only unlike Price and Cueto, he’s not a rental, and unlike Hamels, he’d fit into every single contender’s budget without a problem. At less than $4 million for the rest of this year and just $9 million next year — when he should be projected as a +3 to +4 win player again — Gomez’s contract is highly valuable, especially with the very low risk attached. So the Brewers center fielder is nearly as productive as all of the big name pitchers, yet with a far better contract situation than any of them. And the contract doesn’t add value by giving you a quality outfielder at a cheap price for 2016; the high probability that you can obtain a draft pick by making him a Qualifying Offer next winter offers the chance to mitigate some of the cost that you’ll pay to get him in the first place.

If I was a deadline buyer without a complete outfield in place, I would pay more for Gomez than any other player available, and while I think the Brewers will get a solid return for him, I bet it won’t reflect the entirety of his value. Despite his uptick in power the last few years, he’s still not a classic slugger, and is more of the good-at-everything type that teams have historically underpaid. But while people continue to fawn over one dimensional players like Justin Upton, Gomez pretty clearly helps a team win more games than Upton does. For teams looking for a high quality upgrade for both 2015 and 2016, Gomez is probably the best option on the market.


Hisashi Iwakuma, SP, Seattle
4.89 ERA/5.78 FIP/3.54 xFIP, -0.3 WAR
Rest of Season Projection: +1.0 WAR

2015 has been a pretty miserable year for Iwakuma, as he spent the first couple of months of the year on the DL due to a strained lat muscle, and since returning, he’s given up 10 homers in just 35 innings pitched on his way to a 4.89 ERA/5.78 FIP. With the Mariners essentially out of contention and Iwakuma headed for free agency, he’s one of the few pieces they could probably deal to try and retool for 2016 without the team punting the short-term and having a fire sale. And since he’ll be headed into his age-35 season, and the Mariners already have a lot of money tied up in Felix Hernandez, Robinson Cano, and Nelson Cruz, it isn’t even clear that the team would risk making him a Qualifying Offer this winter, so they have more incentives to make a deal than other teams with free agent pitchers.

And if the Mariners aren’t sure they’re going to make a QO, then Iwakuma may very well cost a lot less than the rest of the pitchers on the market. While he’s not in the top-tier of pitchers available — even though his 27% HR/FB ratio won’t continue, he does have a legitimate dinger problem — he’s likely even better than our forecasts suggest, given the fact that he’s run a .270 BABIP during his 559 innings in the Majors, and looks like a guy who may be able to outperform his FIP on a consistent basis. FIP holds his HR problem against him but doesn’t give him any credit for BABIP suppression, while both ERA and xFIP even those things out, and both think he’s better than FIP suggests.

From a runs allowed perspective, Iwakuma might be expected to be nearly as good as guys like Kazmir and Samardzija, but he’ll certainly cost less to acquire. There’s no question he’s a higher risk option, given his age and recent injury, but a team looking for lower cost upside would have a hard time finding a better option in the pitching market than Iwakuma. I don’t know that I’d want to count on throwing him in the Wild Card game with my season on the line, but for a team that already has an ace — or is likely to win their division — Iwakuma could be a really nice depth option in the middle of their rotation.


Gerardo Parra, OF, Milwaukee
.315/.353/.512, 134 wRC+, +1.1 WAR
Rest of Season Projection: +0.8 WAR

For years, Parra was the kind of player I’ve been been a loud advocate for, the good-enough hitter who plays very good defense, which is a package that adds up to a very solid all-around contributor. This year, though, he’s having an odd season, posting a career-best 134 wRC+ while running a -10 UZR through the first half of the year. Just like we shouldn’t expect him to keep hitting like an All-Star, though, we also shouldn’t believe that he’s turned into a huge liability in the field, and we’re better off looking at the entirety of his track record rather than just the last few months.

And that larger picture suggests that Parra is something like a league average hitter (career 94 wRC+, projected 101 wRC+ rest of season) who should be an average or above average defender in a corner spot, while being able to play center field in a pinch. This makes him a classic tweener, the kind of guy that slips through the cracks because he doesn’t fit into the outdated position-specific roles teams have historically looked for.

Parra comes from the same mold of historically underrated players such as Angel Pagan and Shane Victorino, though the fact that he’s not really an asset on the bases makes him a bit less valuable than those two. Still, the total package makes Parra roughly an average Major League player, which plenty of contenders could use to fill a hole.

And on the off-chance that Parra’s improvement against left-handers this year is real, any acquiring team might get an early look at a guy who could end up being a quality re-sign option after the season. He just turned 28, so he’s young enough to still have some peak years left, and if Parra’s 2015 is more substantial improvement than a hot streak at the plate, picking him up for the stretch run could lead to a chance for a below-market extension before he hits free agency.

He’s not the sexiest of additions, but for a team with a replacement level outfielder in the line-up, Parra could be a very nice role player down the stretch.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MikeIsGreat
9 years ago

I’ve been banging the drum on Gomez and Parra to the Mets for a while now. Too bad they refuse to add payroll or trade prospects. I think either, or both, would help the Mets tremendously and would be perfect fits. Juan Lagares clearly needs TJ surgery and so trading for Gomez would almost perfectly fill the defensive void while he recovers the next year plus. Parra right now is an upgrade in both RF and LF. Granderson has been good but he’s not a good RFer and should move to LF. And Cuddyer, aka Cadaver, is hurt and not very good. He actually might not be a terrible player as a platoon with Duda and a bench piece. As much as the Mets can upgrade their starting lineup, their bench is equally bad and Cuddyer would be an upgrade playing 2 times a week and pinch hitting.

MikeIsGreat
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

Not to mention that Gomez is a tremendous upgrade with the bat over Lagares.

Metsfan
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

I highly doubt that Para and Gomez are issues of money. Both are being paid relatively little, Para is a free agent at the end of the year, and if the Mets didn’t want Gomez for 2016, they could easily trade him this winter.

Rather I expect the Brewers are holding out for the best package of prospects or young, controllable players. And since there seems to be more buyers than sellers, they can probably hold out for a long time and make someone overpay.

I think that will be the big stumbling block for Alderson — the willingness to overpay in terms of talent, despite his statement that he would do so.

MikeIsGreat
9 years ago
Reply to  Metsfan

I really think it is both. Alderson prefers to hang on to prospects. The Mets can’t add payroll. These things don’t have to be mutually exclusive. I think it’s why Alderson is the guy for the job with the Mets from the ownership perspective.

And honestly I’m a Sandy Alderson guy, but it’s hard not to argue that he is hanging on too hard to prospects at this point. I bet that if the team was sold tomorrow and they had room to add payroll he would still be overly cautious about adding payroll through trading prospects.

Metsfan
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

Uh, who said the Mets can’t add payroll? I believe Alderson has said the opposite, that the Mets can add some payroll midseason. Probably not a huge amount, but at least what it would cost to add both Para and Gomez to the team.

Can you find a source who is simply not speculating who says they can’t add payroll? I don’t believe any Mets official or real insider has ever said that.

MikeIsGreat
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

Other than the reports that they are balking at the $3 million Zobrist is getting paid and the knowledge that the Wilpons have no money? Nothing concrete.

Sure, they have said that they can add payroll, but until they do I’ll believe it when I see it. Even with the insurance money they got from Wright’s injury I still doubt they add payroll.

Metsfan
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

Of course the Wilpons have money. Are they in debt still? Yes, but so are a lot of other teams. Point is, they survived the Madoff debacle fairly well, all things considered, and both attendance and SNY ratings are up significantly this year.

Do you have a link that states with certainty that they are balking at paying $3 million? I find that hard to believe. It’s probably a lot of the same speculation or baseless gossip that has been wrong over the years and nothing more.

Unthought_Known
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

It’s tough to put together a Future Value vs Present Value trade offer, because sometimes deals seem irrational. But I wonder if it would make sense to put together a package around Lagares/Wheeler and Gomez. The Mets would upgrade their offense, with no drop-off in defense for this year. The Brewers would immediately shut down Lagares and have him fix his elbow, and once healthy they’ll have an elite defensive CF signed for a few years without too much money, and (assuming he recovers well) they’ll have a high upside pitcher who isn’t making much money yet. There would be no value for 2015, but they’re not in a position to worry about that.

attgig
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

seems like Sandy is great at being a seller, but pretty bad at being a buyer.

Maniel Durphy
9 years ago
Reply to  MikeIsGreat

Mets just want to get something for nothing. They’re not going to offer more than GCL level prospects and expect the Brewers to pay Gomez’s salary…

In all seriousness, the Alderson FO’s record on buy trades is, well… there is no record. Maybe you can say the 2 LHRPs added in ST… ATorres has been a complete mess and they gave up Mazzoni and Brad Wieck (yeesh); and Blevins looked good but obviously drank from the Flushing well bc he broke his arm and has healed like other Mets (very slowly).

So, there’s little to go on that instills faith that Alderson will get anything done here. They’ve always taken the less is more attitude toward building the roster. When in doubt, do nothing. And there is almost always some doubt…

Brian
9 years ago
Reply to  Maniel Durphy

Hard to categorize the Angel Pagan trade as either buy or sell. Whichever it was, Alderson got fleeced.

Metsfan
9 years ago
Reply to  Brian

It’s hard to characterize that trade as a fleece since Pagan has only had one good season with SF.

OTOH, the Wheeler trade still has the potential to turn out to be a big fleece of Sabean.

vivalajeter
9 years ago
Reply to  Brian

Pagan put up an almost 5 WAR season in a World Series year. The Mets’ players contributed very little in a poor season. I’d characterize it as a fleece.

Pagan’s extension may not have gone as well, but the 2012 performances were miles apart.

Metsfan
9 years ago
Reply to  Brian

Here’s the thing though — According to news reports, Collins didn’t want Pagan back. Apparently Collins had some issues with Pagan’s willingness or ability to play at certain times. So it was sort of like a dump and Alderson was sort of forced to trade him.

And it’s not like Pagan had great years either with the Mets. He didn’t have much value the year he was traded. He just happened to put up a career year the first year with the Giants. No one anticipated that and since then, he’s been pretty much a poor player with a bad contract.

So I don’t think it was a fleece. I doubt Alderson regretted that trade.