Ben Clemens FanGraphs Chat – 8/17/20
1:58 |
: What the heck, let’s get started a little early.
|
1:58 |
: There are some awesome questions in the queue and I’m excited to answer them, so I couldn’t just keep waiting here not saying something.
|
1:58 |
: Before we begin, a quick plug for the Trade Value Series, which is going up on the site this week
|
1:59 |
: Craig spent a ton of time working this up, checking it with industry sources and with us, re-ordering, sending the new list around, etc. etc. It’s a huge project but a really fun one
|
2:00 |
: So take some time to read it, it’s really cool
|
2:00 |
: With that, onto the questions
|
2:00 |
: Is Wander Franco’s MILB GB% a legitimate concern regarding his prospects for MLB success? We’ve seen how a low launch angle has affected Vlad Jr. so far. Both have similar ground ball rates in the minors but is there any reason to think Wander can avoid a similar struggle?
|
2:00 |
: Groundball rates are a lot easier to take when you run like Wander Franco
|
2:01 |
: Like, one of the biggest problems with Vlad’s grounders is that he doesn’t turn enough of them into hits
|
2:02 |
: Even then, they weren’t the end of the world — he has a career .269 babip on grounders, which is somehow higher htan league average
|
2:02 |
: I would say it’s a concern, but not a huge one.
|
2:02 |
: In a dynasty, keep forever league, would you rather have Correa/Bregman or Tatis Jr./Muncy?
|
2:03 |
: This is really close. I think I’d take the Bregman/Correa side but I might just be too low on Tatis
|
2:03 |
: I think I was the low responder to Craig when we were discussing where Tatis should go (which, spoiler, is pretty high)
|
2:03 |
: What is your take on the orioles? How much of their improvement (particularly on offense) is real, and how much is fluky? Seems like the statcast numbers have them in a middle-ish range, but they, um, hit a lot of line drives?
|
2:03 |
: I think it’s mostly fluky, sadly
|
2:04 |
: I semi buy Nunez, do buy Alberto, and think Santander is good
|
2:04 |
: Alberto probably will just always be a line drive hitter
|
2:05 |
: But yeah, Niko Goodrum smashed a ton of line drives for a little bit last year too
|
2:05 |
: Line drives are just reallllly unstable
|
2:05 |
: Hi Ben…any thoughts on Mize and Skubal? Im seeing lots of things written that the difference between the two might not be as much as originally thought. Is Skubal only a 70 fastball and that’s it?
|
2:06 |
: I’m probably not the right person to ask on this, but I like Mize a good bit more
|
2:06 |
: I’m just skeptical of fastball-only guys. I think Skubal’s fastball could be the rare one that works well enough that it’s fine
|
2:06 |
: But you have to apply some discounting to that
|
2:07 |
: He’s overpowering minor leaguers but it’s really hard to succeed in the majors as a mostly-heater guy
|
2:07 |
: You can, but plenty of people try and fail
|
2:07 |
: What is actually happening at those “alternate sites”?
|
2:07 |
: As far as I understand, it’s essentially extended spring training
|
2:07 |
: Live BP, drills of various types, just generally trying to teach things for the prospects and stay in game shape for the veterans
|
2:07 |
: Teoscar Hernandez chasing the covered .300 obp .700 slg ratio
|
2:07 |
: Corollary to that, is Good Teoscar here to stay?
|
2:08 |
: I mean…. no?
|
2:08 |
: But hes’ the kind of guy who is prone to hot streaks
|
2:08 |
: So much of his value comes from slug that he naturally gets it in big chunks
|
2:09 |
: He’s hitting the ball even harder this year and also swinging really aggressively, kind of leaning into the Teoscar-ness of it all
|
2:10 |
: If you think of him as a nice 4th outfielder who plays up against lefties I don’t think you’ll go wrong
|
2:10 |
: But I don’t think there’s a 150 wRC+ bat hiding in there
|
2:10 |
: Am I actually trying to make the playoffs or just giving Tigers fans false hope?
|
2:11 |
: Casey Mize & Tarik Skubal. What to expect?
|
2:11 |
: Skubal has a nasty fastball, as profiled above
|
2:12 |
: Mize is polished, throws a four-pitch mix, has an awesome splitter and a great cutter/slider thing
|
2:12 |
: I love that the Tigers are doing this.
|
2:12 |
: It makes a TON of sense
|
2:13 |
: Giving up the back end years on pitchers has rarely come back to haunt teams, and this is a year the Tigers have their best shot at making the playoffs
|
2:13 |
: So go for it!
|
2:13 |
: How are you doing on this Trade Value Monday Ben? Has your dog’s cardboard cutout made a TV appearance yet?
|
2:13 |
: Not yet! Although I haven’t watched every A’s game of late, I’m on a working vacation which means I’ve been watching less baseball at night after writing all day
|
2:13 |
: Hey Ben, you’re in SF, right? Have you had pupusas from Panchita’s #2?
|
2:14 |
: I haven’t but now it’s on the list. I love pupusas
|
2:14 |
: So delaying a few games because of COVID is not ideal, but from an on-field perspective, is there any team that benefits more from playing some 7-inning doubleheaders than the Reds (currently 1st in fWAR in team starting pitching, 25th in fWAR in team bullpen pitching)?
|
2:14 |
: If the Reds have a breakout of positives come back, does that more or less make it impossible to reach 60 games for all the NL Central teams? Seems like a really bad scenario having two teams in the same division with outbreaks
|
2:14 |
: Two questions here, both of which are interesting
|
2:14 |
: I think the Phillies actually benefit more, and they have a boatload of doubleheaders
|
2:14 |
: But don’t forget, a lot of those second games are going to be bullpen games
|
2:15 |
: And, uh
|
2:15 |
: As to YardGoat’s question, yeah it’s really rough.
|
2:15 |
: If they miss 10 games, a lot of the Central will end up short, and there’s no way to avoid it
|
2:15 |
: Kevin Pillar to the Indians: make sense?
|
2:16 |
: I think so? Their outfield is just ughhhhh
|
2:16 |
: Article idea: go through the math on whether to save the closer for the 10th in a tie game (since that inning starts off as higher leverage). I assume the answer is no, but it is good to check these things.
|
2:16 |
: I have some stuff in the queue on home field advantage and on pitching to the corners, but after that perhaps
|
2:16 |
: It would be interesting to see the change with the new rules for sure
|
2:16 |
: Ootp brewers update please?
|
2:17 |
: Bouncing between 1 and 2 games back of the Pirates, in WC2 at the moment
|
2:17 |
: Yelich is back next week
|
2:17 |
: Seems like we handled it okay
|
2:17 |
: If two players with identical bat speed make identical contact with a pitch, but one player is 100 pounds heavier than the other, will the heavier player’s batted ball go significantly further? I am trying to understand if, when announcers say “XYZ player is so strong he can go the opposite way with that pitch”, they really just mean “XYZ player has such good bat speed”.
|
2:17 |
: It’s important to note that I’m not a physicist, so you know, don’t take this as gospel
|
2:18 |
: But from my understanding, it matters in a technical sense, but hte magnitude is so small as to be meaningless
|
2:18 |
: The bat’s weight matters
|
2:18 |
: Because basically you’re transferring the bat’s momentum to the ball
|
2:19 |
: But that’s the key weight, not the player’s
|
2:19 |
: Any actual physicists, please let me know what I’m wrong about
|
2:20 |
: re: the Trade Value series, are there good pieces to read on choosing which interest rate to use for contract NPV calculations? I see numbers ranging from 4% to 8% in past FanGraphs articles, but sadly for most of them the justification for the interest rate is just a dead link to an external site.
|
2:20 |
: Haha there absolutely is not, and it’s something I’ve struggled with quite a bit when I do NPV stuff
|
2:20 |
: I tend to use BBB corporate bond yields as the appropriate team discount rate
|
2:20 |
: Because that seems to most closely approximate their cost of funds
|
2:21 |
: And then when I’m looking at what a player’s cost of deferral is, I kinda freelance. Usually something like t-bills + 100?
|
2:21 |
: Because I assume these guys would be pretty risk-averse with investments when they have life-changing money
|
2:21 |
: What’s a “cutter/slider” thing?
|
2:21 |
: I basically disagree with the bright-line classification of breaking balls
|
2:21 |
: Cutters and sliders are really hard to differentiate depending on how hard they’re thrown
|
2:22 |
: Hard pitches that break glove-side and have either a little bit of ride or a little bit of drop can be cutters or sliders depending on what the pitcher calls it
|
2:22 |
: I think of cutter/slider/curveball as basically just a spectrum of glove-breaking pitches at various velocities
|
2:22 |
: Coefficient of restitution.. surface area of the contact.. (btw.. I am a physicist)..
|
2:23 |
: Bam, real physicist appears
|
2:23 |
: So yeah, the bat itself is very important
|
2:23 |
: Delving into the AL WAR leader Brandon Lowe’s stats this year, I was surprised at how not-outlier-y the usual overperformance metrics like BABIP and HR/FB are, even with some clear overperformance. K%, which stabilizes quickly, is down from 34.6% to 24.7%. Are you a believer? Is this TB’s best position player over Meadows?
|
2:23 |
: I think I’m a believer?
|
2:24 |
: I mean, not that he’s a 200 wRC+ hitter
|
2:24 |
: But like you said, it’s not THAT fluky
|
2:25 |
: I like that he’s just started swinging less, which always looked like a good adjustment for a guy like him with some whiff issues but with good natural power
|
2:25 |
: He’s like a next-level Paul DeJong in that if you can just swing less often
|
2:25 |
: Even at strikes
|
2:25 |
: Good things will happen
|
2:25 |
: I would say he’s Tampa’s best hitter unless you’re really high on Adames
|
2:26 |
: What do the marlins do at the deadline? Buy, Sell, Hold?
|
2:26 |
: I think they’re likely to hold
|
2:26 |
: What are they really trading?
|
2:27 |
: There’s not a ton on that team that they want to trade and that other teams want to buy
|
2:27 |
: Ryne Stanek or something?
|
2:27 |
: Is Robbie Grossman’s newly found pop forreal?
|
2:27 |
: Let’s be cautious and say probably not
|
2:27 |
: But I haven’t looked into it enough
|
2:27 |
: Would Adam Eaton be a decent trade candidate for Cleveland or San Diego, assuming the Nats are not in the playoff hunt by the deadline? And if so, what type of return could he possible garner? Thanks.
|
2:27 |
: As a fun exercise, could you come up with a trade involving the Nats that makes sense for both the Nats and the other team involved? Thanks.
|
2:27 |
: Nats trades are hard! They have 75 second basemen
|
2:27 |
: But they’re playing their prospect second baseman instead
|
2:28 |
: And I’m fairly certain that no one values old second basemen as highly as the Nats, or they wouldn’t have ended up with all of them
|
2:28 |
: So those are the guys they should try to get rid of, it’s where they have surpluse
|
2:28 |
: Surplus*
|
2:29 |
: jason kipnis says hello from the northside..
|
2:29 |
: Lol
|
2:29 |
: Okay so, what about Asdrubal Cabrera to a team that needs second base help?
|
2:30 |
: Kendrick probably can’t handle that fulltime and Castro is hurt
|
2:30 |
: I’ll come back to this, thinking about it in the background
|
2:30 |
: Too soon to argue that Juan Soto is THE best hitter on the planet? It seems inevitable.
|
2:30 |
: Probably too soon. But it’ll happen at some point. He keeps getting better and Trout will eventually decline
|
2:30 |
: Being a Red Sox fan, I’m starting to look forward to next year’s draft. But I’m reading rumors about the draft seeding for next next year not following this year’s win %. What scheme do you think makes sense for draft seeding after 1/3 of a season? Combine 2019 & 2020? Lottery? Other?
|
2:30 |
: I think they should just use 2020
|
2:30 |
: It’s every bit as arbitrary as anything else
|
2:31 |
: I actually think they should redo the whole system but assuming they’re keeping the whole last place gets the first pick plan in general
|
2:31 |
: Why should this year be any different?
|
2:31 |
: How do the Padres replace Pham?
|
2:32 |
: Yeah, this one stings
|
2:32 |
: We think they’ll use a lot of Profar in the outfield since Cronenworth has hit so well that he’s locked second base up for the future (it seems)
|
2:32 |
: But like, ew
|
2:33 |
: Trading every single one of their surplus outfielders looked awesome in the offseason but it stung them here
|
2:33 |
: I guess I’d run with Profar for now and see what teams drop out of the race. The Nats might trade Eaton if they go 3-7 or 2-8 in the next 10 games or whatever
|
2:34 |
: Any chance we see more of Olivares now that Pham is injured?
|
2:34 |
: Yes, definite higher chance. If Profar keeps scuffling and isn’t a transcendent outfield defender (and I mean, he’s probably not), they have to try something
|
2:34 |
: Pham is basically out the rest of the year. Can’t just be passive
|
2:34 |
: Kris Bryant looks over matched. How concerned are you about his weak start
|
2:34 |
: I’m not, at least not yet
|
2:36 |
: He’s not hitting enough line drives, and he’s not swinging enough
|
2:37 |
: But it’s a small sample and I want to see more before I really think anything
|
2:37 |
: So, if the Nats do go 3-7 or so during the next 10 games and decide to deal Eaton to the Pham-less Padres, what could that deal potentially look like?
|
2:37 |
: Presumably a 40/45 kind of prospect
|
2:37 |
: I think it’d be funny for them to trade Anderson Espinoza
|
2:37 |
: After he was so hyped and then so injured
|
2:37 |
: Would you rather have the older guy with two years of control left (arb) or the younger guy with five years left? Assume similar projected WAR per year.
|
2:38 |
: If it’s similar per year, I’ll take the extra years
|
2:38 |
: If it’s similar total value, I think I’m in the minority among baseball front office views but I’d take the older guy
|
2:38 |
: Why are the OOTP pirates so much better than the real life pirates? Ownership?
|
2:38 |
: Every single player had a 95th percentile outcome
|
2:38 |
: And then they made a really good trade for Marcus Semien at the deadline
|
2:39 |
: But if the actual Pirates played like the OOTP Pirates I’d like their odds of a playoff run
|
2:39 |
: I think they have the potential for good pitching (which has happened in OOTP)
|
2:40 |
: But they need all the replacement-ish hitters to hit for the whole package to work, or for Bell and Reynolds and Frazier to take steps forward
|
2:40 |
: Ben, I live on Cole and Parnassus and frequent the Kezar, so you’re obliged to answer my question…Mize and Skubel, Skubel and Mize…the REAL gem here is Paredes getting the call up. The kid can hit for 60 power. What do you make of his chances to find ABs?
|
2:40 |
: Oh yeah he’s a big deal too
|
2:40 |
: I think I favor Mize of the three but yes, he’s great
|
2:40 |
: I think his chances of getting AB’s are really good
|
2:40 |
: You don’t call him up and not give him a bunch of AB’s
|
2:40 |
: If you did that, you’d be starting his service time clock without helping his development
|
2:40 |
: What was the hype around Amed Rosario and what has changed? He had horrible plate discipline when he came up, some bad lower body mechanics when he came up etc. and he still has those things. Is it just a matter of not being able to improve or has he picked up some bad habits along the way? I realize he’s played ~15 games this season but he’s borderline unplayable
|
2:40 |
: I’m a long-time Amed hype man
|
2:41 |
: So let’s see if I can distill my thoughts about him into a few sentences
|
2:41 |
: I thought that his frame and his athleticism meant that he’d iron out the kinks on defense
|
2:42 |
: And that he’d be floored at okay, with upside to excellent if he could bulk up and hit for power
|
2:42 |
: He never had a great approach, but he was just athletic enough that you kind of hoped it still worked
|
2:42 |
: It, uh, it hasn’t quite yet
|
2:43 |
: It’s too early to say anything has changed
|
2:43 |
: the second half of 2019 was all pretty good, for example
|
2:43 |
: But it’s very frustrating that the stuff he isn’t improving at is so easy to see
|
2:43 |
: Bradley is gone, Who knows what happens to Benny, Devers has been awful.. Am I the future of Bean Town?
|
2:43 |
: Haha nah man, it’s Devers
|
2:43 |
: People can be terrible and still have a great outlook
|
2:44 |
: Verdugo is a nice player, but the future is definitely still Devers/Bogaerts there as far as I’m concerned
|
2:44 |
: You mean I won’t get a real shot with Pham out?
|
2:45 |
: I’m skeptical but hey, he already has 8 PA!
|
2:45 |
: If Almonte is bad and they aren’t ready to call Trammell up, why not?
|
2:45 |
: I’m re-evaluating the Rockies. 29th best at striking hitters out, have the second lowest HR/FB%, and Daniel Bard is their best bullpen option. The good times won’t last.
|
2:45 |
: It doesn’t feel great
|
2:46 |
: I think they’re still above 50% to make the playoffs, but the easy schedule at the start and hard schedule thereafter is a recpie for this feeling
|
2:46 |
: They still have a lot of clashes with the Dodgers and yikes
|
2:46 |
: Home teams are almost exactly .500 so far this season without crowds (not that HFA was huge beforehand), so the playoff round of 16 is going to be a crapshoot. Are you looking forward to the first 27-29 World Series champion, and who has a plausible chance of doing it among the .500-ish logjam?
|
2:46 |
: I was actually doing some digging into HFA right before this chat started
|
2:47 |
: Expect something on it toward the end of the week
|
2:47 |
: Suffice it to say it’s still there this year
|
2:47 |
: But that yeah, it’s not gonna matter much in a three-game series
|
2:47 |
: Not that it ever really has in a series that short
|
2:48 |
: How for real is Ian Happ’s breakout? Obviously he won’t sustain this, but 120 wRC+ going forward maybe?
|
2:48 |
: I’m very confused about what’s going on with Happ
|
2:49 |
: If he were walking a Happ-y amount of the time, this would just look like a normal hot streak
|
2:49 |
: Instead of ‘hey has he changed something?’
|
2:49 |
: But basically he’s swinging less and pitchers still think he’s crazy free swinging Happ from last year
|
2:50 |
: He has one of the lowest zone rates in baseball according to our stats
|
2:50 |
: And is only swinging 35% of the time
|
2:50 |
: It’s a great combination
|
2:50 |
: I want to see what happens when pitchers start attacking him, but I’m cautiously optimistic
|
2:50 |
: Best batting stance ever is……..?
|
2:50 |
: It’s Gary Sheffield
|
2:50 |
: I don’t think it’s particularly close
|
2:51 |
: How long do i have to keep hitting before I’m the starting 1b? Alonso is a perfect DH in a world without Cano
|
2:51 |
: The Mets kind of leaned into it, or at least foreshadowed that they would, for a few games last week
|
2:51 |
: And I was extremely into it
|
2:51 |
: I don’t know why they didn’t follow through. Alonso really IS sketchy on defense
|
2:51 |
: A Padre’s deal appear to have two items to consider. 1.) An SP that improves/lenghtens their staff is more critical than any other acquisition and 2.) an OF’er, preferably a LHH. How about a trade of Clevinger & Naquin to the padres for Campusano, Cole Wilcox and Jeisson Rosario?
|
2:52 |
: Aside from having to look up Jeisson Rosario, I was immediately intrigued by this deal
|
2:52 |
: The Indians might be extremely motivated to deal Clevinger
|
2:54 |
: Wilcox as a PTBNL and Campusano are probably enough of a headliner for two years of Clevinger
|
2:54 |
: 2+ rather
|
2:54 |
: So I guess? I don’t think the Indians would be willing to part with Naquin though which makes the whole thing sketchy
|
2:54 |
: They BADLY need outfield depth, particularly lefty outfield depth, too
|
2:54 |
: My batting stance would beg to differ
|
2:55 |
: Oh haha disagree. I spent so much of my youth emulating Sheffield’s
|
2:55 |
: As a Cardinals fan living in Tennessee, no less
|
2:55 |
: It was just so cool
|
2:55 |
: Best batting stance ever is Rickey Henderson for me because he literally shrunk the strike zone. His OBP paved the way to one of the most unique HOF careers.
|
2:55 |
: That’s another really cool one, though Rickey’s prime didn’t overlap with my youth which disqualifies him for me
|
2:55 |
: It has to be one that I imitated
|
2:55 |
: But yeah, his is cool for sure
|
2:55 |
: Can you recall a team (players, not execs) being so outwardly mad at a fellow player as the Cleveland Baseball Team are at the pitchers?
|
2:55 |
: When do we see plesac and clevinger pitch again?
|
2:56 |
: I really cannot
|
2:56 |
: That Passan article was eye-opening
|
2:57 |
: It wouldn’t surprise me if they didn’t pitch before September
|
2:57 |
: And it wouldn’t completely floor me if they didn’t pitch again this year
|
2:57 |
: Sonny Gray: odds on favorite to win the NL Cy Young this year?
|
2:59 |
: I think that it’s still deGrom unless he misses his next turn
|
2:59 |
: And then after that I have Darvish a bit ahead of Gray
|
2:59 |
: But quite close btw. Darvish and Gray
|
2:59 |
: deGrom is just a cut above if he’s healthy
|
2:59 |
: And it’s not like he’s started slowly or anything
|
2:59 |
: If Clevinger and Plesac lose a year of service time, are we going to see a grievance filed?
|
2:59 |
: This is quite interesting actually
|
3:00 |
: I think they’d probably try to file a grievance
|
3:00 |
: I’m not sure the PA would be interested in it
|
3:01 |
: I mean, half the team was saying they wouldn’t play if these guys did
|
3:01 |
: (probably a slight exaggeration on my part, to be clear)
|
3:01 |
: Kris Bryant’s grievance was a cause celebre with the MLBPA because everyone on the player side hates that teams manipulate playing time to cost players money
|
3:02 |
: I’m not sure they’d be so in for getting players who willfully lied to and endangered their teammates a little extra dough
|
3:02 |
: If the PA fails to file a grievance, will we see an unfair labor charge filed by Clevinger and Plesac with the NLRB against the PA for breaching its duty of fair representation?
|
3:02 |
: So, definitely not a lawyer
|
3:02 |
: Maybe? BUt I’m not sure, it’s not really clear to me that this is being done for service time manipulation
|
3:03 |
: I think the front office would prefer, all things being equal, having those guys in the rotation
|
3:03 |
: Expected playing time for the tigers prospects called up? Will they slot in the rotation or bullpen
|
3:03 |
: They’re slated to start tomorrow and Wednesday
|
3:03 |
: So just regular rotation pieces it looks like
|
3:03 |
: If the Marlins or Cardinals manage to only play about 45-50 games are they still qualified to make the playoffs, winning % notwithstanding? What’s the cutoff there?
|
3:03 |
: I think the cutoff is probably around 50 games for me
|
3:03 |
: But I think winning percentage is a fine way to determine it
|
3:04 |
: Just, below 50 games it’s going to feel reallllly weird
|
3:04 |
: It looks incredibly unlikely that anyone will finish that low, so I don’t see it being an issue
|
3:04 |
: Do the Angels need a change in the Front Office?
|
3:04 |
: Maybe. They seem to need an ownership change, but taht’s obviously tough
|
3:05 |
: But when Arte Moreno is firing scouts left and right to save money and reportedly on the front lines of every single time where owners try to cut costs in any way possible
|
3:05 |
: It’s pretty easy to believe that their front office is under-staffed and under-funded
|
3:05 |
: Soooooo
|
3:05 |
: If you are the Indians you have to be concerned that the moment you promote them they would just opt out which would allow them to get their service time.
|
3:05 |
: I don’t think that’s how it works, right?
|
3:05 |
: If you’re not a high-risk individual you can’t get service time if you opt out
|
3:05 |
: Unless I misunderstood how that works
|
3:05 |
: Pick one as more likely to make the playoffs: Tigers or Red Sox?
|
3:05 |
: Tigers
|
3:05 |
: THey’re adding talent and the Red Sox will likely look to dela
|
3:05 |
: That rotation, woof
|
3:06 |
: And I’m the idiot who picked the Sox to make the playoffs
|
3:06 |
: Why is MLB not scheduling double headers now so that each team has a few games in hand in the event of later being shut down.
|
3:06 |
: I don’t hate this idea — backload days off into September. Teams would probably be into it too because they get rest days if not
|
3:06 |
: The Cardinals asked for more DH’s and more rest days, for example
|
3:06 |
: As a baseball fan who dives deep into numbers and is constantly looking stuff up during games I’m very excited to watch the basketball playoffs where I understand nothing (wat is pick am roll? Don’t care!) And just watch tall men do absurd things.
|
3:06 |
: Oh I’m 100% the same way
|
3:06 |
: I have very strong and irrational opinions about basketball
|
3:07 |
: I hate the Rockets, I love the Nuggets
|
3:07 |
: Just from watching a few of their games
|
3:07 |
: It’s so fun to watch something and not have to analyze
|
3:07 |
: I made a bet with a friend that the Red Sox would make the playoffs at least once in the next three years. This year is looking bad for me. Should I be worried about the next two as well?
|
3:07 |
: I continue to believe they’ll make the playoffs whenever they decide they’re going to field a full rotation
|
3:07 |
: They clearly weren’t trying this year
|
3:08 |
: I think I like your side but losing 1/3 of your outs is obviously not ideal
|
3:08 |
: Re: Tigers vs. Red Sox: Are Mize and Skubal better rotation options than anyone in the Red Sox rotation right?
|
3:08 |
: More impactful – Mize or Skubal?
|
3:08 |
: I think so?
|
3:08 |
: I favor Mize over Skubal but it’s close
|
3:08 |
: What did you study in college, and was it helpful given what ended up being your career path? Was there anything in particular you wish you had spent more / less time on?
|
3:08 |
: Oh this is a fun question
|
3:08 |
: So I was initially an Econ/Religion double major
|
3:08 |
: Then I dropped religion and picked up at various times math and psychology
|
3:08 |
: Both of which I ended up not adding
|
3:09 |
: Ended up Econ, with enough credits to minor in psych or math
|
3:09 |
: But minoring was a pain so I didn’t
|
3:09 |
: I think the most useful stuff I learned in college was a few math classes that did a good job making me think more logically and then game and auction theory classes in econ
|
3:09 |
: I learned almost none of the actual skills I use on the job from college but I leanred a ton about how to think
|
3:09 |
: It’s not irrational to hate the Rockets. It’s just difficult to explain and articulate to people who don’t understand.
|
3:09 |
: Yeah I cannot articulate it very well at all
|
3:10 |
: Harden is incredible
|
3:10 |
: And I just
|
3:10 |
: bah
|
3:10 |
: I guess it’s easy to articulate why I don’t like Westbrook
|
3:10 |
: but yeah
|
3:10 |
: How many years back into history do you have to go to find a starting rotation worse than the Red Sox?
|
3:10 |
: Weirdly this year’s Giants might be worse
|
3:11 |
: Particularly after they inevitably trade Gausman
|
3:12 |
: But if you won’t give me that, I still think last year’s Orioles were worse
|
3:12 |
: Ohtani or Bohm ROS?
|
3:12 |
: Ohtani but I’m not all that sure. I wonder if they shut him down if they fall out of the race
|
3:12 |
: WHich is a huge risk
|
3:12 |
: WIthout that it’d be easy Ohtani for me though
|
3:12 |
: Religion?? Never would’ve guessed! Would be fascinating to talk to our 18-year-old selves
|
3:12 |
: Yeah I was just curious (I grew up unitarian universalist which does a good job making you curious about other religions) but the major was just a real pain
|
3:13 |
: Do you see the Phillies making a move for a CF now with Haseley and Quinn out
|
3:13 |
: I think they kind of have to
|
3:13 |
: I haven’t really figured out who that would be
|
3:13 |
: But PIllar maybe?
|
3:13 |
: What is an optimal trade deadline strategy for teams not the playoffs this season but prob not in 21 or even 22 ?
|
3:13 |
: I’m guessing this means teams with a shot htis year but no shot next year
|
3:14 |
: Because that’s a really interesting question
|
3:14 |
: I think you stand pat, as lame as that sounds
|
3:14 |
: The deadline is going to be a seller’s market this year I think
|
3:14 |
: Or potentially just a completely nonexistent market if buyers aren’t willing to pay up
|
3:14 |
: On a scale of Donovan Solano to Dylan Bundy, how real is Gausman’s improvement this year?
|
3:14 |
: It’s in the middle, but here’s the thing
|
3:15 |
: I think Gausman was already better than either of those guys
|
3:15 |
: So he needs less of the improvement to be real
|
3:15 |
: I think he’s a legit 2/3 kind of pitcher at this point
|
3:15 |
: Follow up to that what do you figure the price for Yaz would be
|
3:15 |
: I think it would be quite high, and I doubt anyone is paying it
|
3:16 |
: If I’m the Giants, I’d be asking for someone who would hurt
|
3:16 |
: Spencer Howard, maybe, or Bohm, though I think BOhm might be light?
|
3:16 |
: I’ve bought in on Yaz
|
3:16 |
: Not that he’s Mike Trout, but that he’s a plus-bat guy who can handle center who is basically free
|
3:16 |
: He’ll never hit free agency
|
3:16 |
: I think that’s actually true, I doubt he still is active when he reaches free agency
|
3:17 |
: Better odds that Blackmon hits over .400 or someone (who qualifies for the batting title) hits under .140?
|
3:18 |
: I think it’s hits under .140
|
3:18 |
: Particularly because the guys doing it right now will keep getting playing time
|
3:18 |
: (Evan White, Eugenio Suarez, Gary Sanchez)
|
3:18 |
: Random thought sort of related to Charlie Blackmon, what’s the longest stretch of PAs a player has maintained a .500 average over? Any idea?
|
3:18 |
: Jay looked into various forms of this last week, I believe:
|
3:19 |
: What is more likely: one of Betts or Tatis wins the NL MVP? Anyone else in the NL wins the NL MVP?
|
3:19 |
: THe first by far
|
3:19 |
: SO much of the season has already happened
|
3:19 |
: And Betts was probably already a front-runner before the season
|
3:19 |
: If social distancing and mask wearing (PPE) protocols were followed (and the so claimed by Plesac and Clevinger), then there was no endangerment. The demotion to Lake Country (The Alternate Training site for the Indians) would be only punishment with the collateral loss of service time and it’s fiscal punishment.. The MLBPA would clearly want that to NOT happen…
|
3:19 |
: I’m not party to all the exact details
|
3:19 |
: But the Indians have said, per Passan, that both Clevinger and Plesac were caught in various lies
|
3:20 |
: Which lowers my ability to believe the rest of what they said significantly
|
3:20 |
: And I mean, ‘no endangerment’ is clearly not right
|
3:20 |
: I’m going to be socially isolating when I get back to SF (I’m in southern California right now)
|
3:20 |
: Because people out and about here wear masks a lot less frequently than they do in the city
|
3:20 |
: I’m doing my part, but that’s not zero risk, you know?
|
3:20 |
: Does David Fletcher have a few 4.5+ WAR seasons in his career?
|
3:20 |
: Gosh I hope so
|
3:20 |
: David Fletcher is so fun
|
3:20 |
: It’s just great for baseball that he exists
|
3:21 |
: One would think that that the Indians might be forced to trade one or both of Clevinger/Plesac, which might bring them decent pieces, in the OF, for example, but it would surely decimate their starting pitching edge for years. Thoughts ?
|
3:21 |
: I think that they will end up trading Clevinger, to be honest
|
3:21 |
: He’s closer to free agency so more expensive
|
3:22 |
: And yeah, it’s going to push back their competitive window
|
3:22 |
: But they seem like a team who loves pushing back their competitive window
|
3:22 |
: So it’s hardly a stretch
|
3:22 |
: What does it say about a team who trades for either of the indian pitchers who broke protocol?
|
3:22 |
: You can take the optimistic side and say it shows they think their locker room has the right leaders to control them
|
3:22 |
: Challenge trades like that happen from time to time
|
3:23 |
: I think that’s absolutely what hte team will say
|
3:23 |
: But if they don’t clear it with the veterans in the locker room first, uh, it might be messy
|
3:23 |
: That piece looks at most hits to start the season, I’m more curious about how long over any stretch .500 has happened, but not sure how to tease the info out of leaderboards.
|
3:23 |
: Oh I see
|
3:23 |
: Huh
|
3:23 |
: I’m not sure of a way to do that either, unfortunately, without doing a TON of manual work
|
3:23 |
: Like, downloading every line ever a ton of work
|
3:23 |
: Where would you set the over/under on career innings pitched in Shohei Ohtani’s future?
|
3:23 |
: Ugh
|
3:23 |
: Boooooo
|
3:23 |
: But this is a good question, to be clear
|
3:23 |
: Just a sad one
|
3:23 |
: I think it’s honestly like 200
|
3:24 |
: Because I thinkt here’s a real chance that it’s 0
|
3:24 |
: And so you have to get very few other scenarios to find a breakeven line
|
3:24 |
: Hope I’m wrong
|
3:24 |
: Do you think the Red Sox will look to sell Brandon Workman and/or JD Martinez at the deadline?
|
3:24 |
: Yes, and I think they find a taker for Workman but not JD
|
3:24 |
: Jeff Passan wrote today that the time between balls in play has gone up by nearly 40 real time seconds since 2011. That legitimately does seem like a problem. How can baseball fix this? Is it even possible?
|
3:25 |
: It’s a really hard thing to fix, and I wouldn’t ocnsider myself the best qualified person to ask about it
|
3:25 |
: But I’ve always liked the idea of a deader ball but a further back mound
|
3:25 |
: NO idea if that would work
|
3:25 |
: But I’d like to see a lot more thought given to deadening the ball at the same time you take something major away from pitchers
|
3:25 |
: Pull out your crystal ball: what does Kershaw re-sign for in winter 2021?
|
3:25 |
: 3/52 with incentives
|
3:26 |
: (that was actually out of my arbitrary guess bag, but that’s close, right?)
|
3:26 |
: When will Cleveland trade for a major league outfielder?
|
3:26 |
: Hey they traded for Oscar Mercado, Puig, and Delino DeShields in the past three years
|
3:26 |
: Oh, only Puig counts?
|
3:26 |
: Then I’ll say 2021
|
3:26 |
: Does Kershaw actually sign anywhere after his current deal? I could see him retiring instead.
|
3:27 |
: I think he stays in LA
|
3:27 |
: For a few more years at least
|
3:27 |
: He’s younger than you think, and he’s still great
|
3:27 |
: He does seem like the type who might walk away still on top
|
3:27 |
: But I think he also really badly wants to win more stuff
|
3:27 |
: Who says no to this trade: Tigers receive: Franklin Barreto A’s receive: Jonathan Schoop and INTL signing money
|
3:28 |
: I think the Tigers would say no
|
3:28 |
: But I do think it’s not super far off
|
3:28 |
: If the Tigers were out of the hunt and not bringing up their prospects they might snap it off and just see what htey have in Barreto
|
3:28 |
: But replacement level is realllllly low at second base for them right now
|
3:29 |
: It’s Harold Castro if it’s not Schoop
|
3:29 |
: And they’re clearly trying to make the playoffs this year
|
3:29 |
: So I dunno if they can do that and then also just plug Barreto into their starting lineup
|
3:30 |
: You’re not wrong on the valuation, though, just the TIgers’ mindset, in my eyes
|
3:30 |
: Start mize on Wednesday?
|
3:30 |
: For sure
|
3:30 |
: It’s so weird how many fiddly fixes people try to come up with to get more balls in play when all you need to do is raise the bottom of the strike zone to the top of the knees. It got lowered in the 90s to the bottom of the knees so just bring it back up.
|
3:30 |
: That could be the pitcher fix too
|
3:30 |
: I just don’t think you want to do something that only helps hitters right now
|
3:30 |
: Overall offense isn’t low
|
3:30 |
: It’s jsut homer-based
|
3:30 |
: Who is JaCoby Jones? Great defensive OF one year, terrible the next; consistently mediocre hitter before this season but off to a hot start. Not sure what to think
|
3:31 |
: xwOBA is an overrated stat, of course
|
3:31 |
: Or, well, I dunno if that’s true
|
3:31 |
: I think it’s overused analytically
|
3:32 |
: But actually properly rated
|
3:32 |
: No one would tell you it’s the end-all be-all but it’s useful
|
3:32 |
: It thinks Jones is better this year, and he’s hitting the ball harder
|
3:32 |
: But he’s also getting wildly lucky
|
3:33 |
: I think he settles down into an average-ish hitter
|
3:33 |
: As for the defense, he looks the part to me, and Statcast likes him well enough
|
3:33 |
: I guess a nice little piece?
|
3:33 |
: What are your thoughts on xFIP?
|
3:34 |
: If I only got one run estimator for pitchers
|
3:34 |
: I think I’d pick xFIP
|
3:34 |
: It has issues, it really does fail to capture some pitchers with HR skill
|
3:34 |
: But it gets a lot right very simply
|
3:34 |
: It’s something I always look at
|
3:35 |
: NOt the last thing I look at, but somewhere in the stack every time
|
3:35 |
: Ben why are the Mariners and dodgers playing 2 games in LA starting today then travelling to Seattle to play 2 more games. Why not just play all 4 in one place because of you know covid…
|
3:35 |
: Asking as a noob, why all the hype around Mize? He didn’t even break 9 K/9 in AA last year and projections have him at a 5.26 ERA.
|
3:36 |
: Because his stuff looks good and he didn’t pitch at AA long enough for that to be hugely predictive, but still had good run prevention numbers in that sample (also not hugely predictive)
|
3:36 |
: Mostly because he’s a top overall pick who has done well at every level in the minors, though
|
3:36 |
: Do you value xFIP over SIERA?
|
3:37 |
: Yes, but not by much. I don’t like the opacity of SIERA, the fact that it rates different batted ball outcomes differently but not in an intuitive way.
|
3:38 |
: It has a lot of non-linearities in it, which means that if those are modeled a little wrong you might get some very weird results
|
3:38 |
: Whereas xFIP is less precise but its misses are linear
|
3:38 |
: Move the fences back? Maybe not practical, but creates more balls in play and doesn’t mess with the mound distance which could be problematic
|
3:38 |
: Then you need to do something to harm pitchers more
|
3:39 |
: If you just move the fences back right now, you’re turning HR into doubles and outs
|
3:39 |
: So it’s more balls in play but it doesn’t do anything about strikeouts and walks, which I think are the real thing people dislike
|
3:39 |
: Do you think Santana can make it to the end of the season with a walk rate at or above 20%?
|
3:40 |
: We project that he will!
|
3:40 |
: By the skinniest of margins
|
3:41 |
: But he already has 40% of his projected PA’s in the bank at like 28%
|
3:41 |
: So, I’ll say yes
|
3:41 |
: That’s fun
|
3:41 |
: Believer in Dom Smith? What do the Mets do after 2020?
|
3:41 |
: Yes I am. I think they pray for a universal DH, then end up doing this weird LF thing with him if they can’t get one
|
3:41 |
: Robo umps would also help because the strike zone would always be the same none of this borderline called a strike one inning but a ball the next stuff.
|
3:41 |
: Players will give you different answers on that
|
3:42 |
: Lots of players think that an automated strike zone would be hugely pitching friendly because it would make it far easier to get strikes on breaking balls that clip only a corner of the three-dimensional zone
|
3:42 |
: I don’t think a strike zone robot is clearly one way or another
|
3:42 |
: The consistent reason given for why he’s not up is that the really good big league players all had 400 – 600 upper minors PAs. Is that basically true?
|
3:42 |
: So no, but it’s kind of true of catchers?
|
3:42 |
: Catching prospects tend to take longer
|
3:43 |
: I think he’s not up b/c they know they aren’t winning this year and don’t want to lose a year of Bart, though
|
3:43 |
: Like, you can bandy around whatever reasons you like, but at the end of the day, money talks
|
3:43 |
: Move the fences back, deaden the ball. Lower the mound and shrink the strike zone.
|
3:43 |
: I’m not sure if I’d like this type of baseball long-term but I’d love it short-term
|
3:44 |
: On this note, I’m going to call it a chat. Thanks for talking today everyone, there were so many excellent questions that I couldn’t remotely get to them all.
|
3:44 |
: Have a great day, and be safe!
|
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Twitter @_Ben_Clemens.
+1 to Panchita’s #2