Bubba Starling’s Lengthy Swing

Last week, a number of chat questions about Kansas City Royals Bubba Starling earned me comparisons to ESPN’s Skip Bayless for statements perceived as outlandish. Yes, Starling was a top-5 overall pick in one of the deepest drafts in recent memory. Yes, he was a two sport athlete with the assumed ceiling of not only a big leaguer, but National Football League quarterback as well. And to complete the trifecta. the young centerfielder was drafted by his hometown team and grew up only a half hour outside of Kansas City. There’s a movie script here. Damn me for ruining the happy ending.

Video after the jump

Going to the park in Greeneville, Tennessee to see Starling in person, I knew little about him other than basic background, current stat line and a few swings from video I’d seen at draft time a year earlier. In having little interest in industry consensus, about the only buzz I knew about Starling this season was that he was 20 and in short season baseball — A prospect red flag.

To compare, Indians Francisco Lindor was taken eighth overall in the 2011 draft and opened the season in full season Single-A ball at 27 months Starling’s junior. In going to the park, my purpose for seeing Starling was to not only see him in action, but to figure out why the organization has yet to take the kid gloves off its prized possession. After a few swings, the answer became obvious. Starling’s swing length and “hitchy” load had the potential for disaster in full season baseball.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

From the jump, Starling’s trigger mechanism to achieve hitting position includes a double hand hitch and hip gyration which creates very little actual weight transfer. Yes, timing mechanisms of some sort are needed, but this movement results in very little positive effect on his ability to drive the baseball.

The second issue that is noticeable is Starling locking his pull arm while starting to drift forward at a point where his weight should be back and ready to attack the baseball. Once the pull arm becomes locked, there’s no way to swing without leading with the front shoulder, creating significant swing length. This explains the near semi-circle bat path in the back of his swing.

For me personally, loose hands and hand/wrist speed are the marks of a strong hitter. In the case of Starling, his current mechanical flaws make it impossible to be short and quick to the baseball. If his mechanics don’t allow him to bring the bat knob to the hip and stay inside the baseball, then it’s impossible for me to buy into him as a hitter at this point.

My final major concern is that the video reveals Starling is essentially a single plane hitter. This means he has very little to no ability to actually adjust to a pitch where it’s thrown. In the nine swings captured on video, only the swing at the :26 mark stands out as slightly different from the rest. And even that swing was marked with a “?” by me because it probably could have passed for the same plane, as Starling swung under a fastball.

We can argue small sample size and things of that nature, but there’s also something to be said about prospects being “easy scouts”. As a hitter, Starling qualified as an easy scout. Throw him fastballs on the outer half and mix in the occasional breaking ball and his power is mitigated. Mix in a four-seamer at the letters every so often to keep him honest and he’s not going to hurt you.

Of prospects I’d scouted previously, Starling most resembled Trayce Thompson of the Chicago White Sox — Although if you twisted my arm, I prefer Thompson’s bat a little more. After posting a .241/.329/.457 triple slash line in the South Atlantic League at 20, Thompson, a former 2nd rounder, saw three levels this season finishing the year at Triple-A with improved numbers across the board.

Bubba Starling is likely to reach Kansas City in spite of his offensive flaws. The struggle is connecting the dots between what Starling is at 20 and an impact player at the big league level. Yes, Starling has excellent raw power and the above average athleticism to project as a contributor on defense and the base paths. However, if he strikes out 170 times or more per season and fits the mold of mistake hitter to a tee, then that profile can be found outside the top-5 picks in an entire draft and leaves him on the outside looking in in terms of the top-100 prospects in baseball.





Mike Newman is the Owner/Managing Editor ofROTOscouting, a subscription site focused on baseball scouting, baseball prospects and fantasy baseball. Follow me onTwitter. Likeus on Facebook.Subscribeto my YouTube Channel.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TX Ball Scout
13 years ago

“Once the pull arm becomes locked, there’s no way to swing without leading with the front shoulder, creating significant swing length”

A lot of hitting coaches are now teaching this.

GreenevilleAstrosAre#1
13 years ago
Reply to  Mike Newman

What’s the philosophy behind both sides of the locked pull arm story? I remember hearing swing tips from Lou Gehrig on an old, currently un-findable video that involved a straight leading arm. I know bats were weighted differently in the 1920s, if that changes things. Gehrig obviously didn’t have the balance/drifting forward problems Starling has (as mentioned in the article). If Starling’s weight were shifted properly, would his locked pull arm still be a red flag?

GreenevilleAstrosAre#1
13 years ago
Reply to  Mike Newman

Thanks for the response (and all the scouting!)

This makes a lot of sense. I think I misinterpreted the fact that, while certain players bring their hands very far back, this does not mean their elbow is locked out. From a musculoskeletal perspective, your triceps are sort of helpless if your elbow is fully extended, which would explain a loss of bat speed and = disaster.

This clip of Babe Ruth’s hitting mechanics (which I found to be pretty neat) is probably the best example of the extremely-far-back hands that fooled me (clips of Ken Griffey Jr.’s swing would have fooled my amateur eyes in much the same way). Anyway, thanks for the clarification!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBmB–g0_U8&feature=player_detailpage#t=54s

Balthazar
13 years ago
Reply to  Mike Newman

So Mike, I’m with you all the way on your preferences. Light, loose hands; stay back on a short, tight swing; keep the elbow bent so you can adjust to get the head of the bat to the ball (rather than just hack as hard as you can). One doesn’t want a limp from arm, but locking up adds no positives while having plenty of negatives.

I’m not surprised to hear Starling is behind the curve as a hitter, so to speak. He had very, very little development. I wonder that the Royals don’t hire him a personal batting coach to work on all of this, especially the hitch. That’s got to be so glaring any pro would focus on ironing that out. Letting him get lots of swings with bad mechanics is _counter_ productive, or anti-development to say it differently.