Busy Mets Keep On Spending, Bring Back Adam Ottavino on Two-Year Deal

The Mets, in their shopping spree of an off-season, have brought back yet another player from last year’s squad. Joining the already re-signed Brandon Nimmo and Edwin Díaz, Adam Ottavino has also agreed to run it back with a team clearly willing to upgrade wherever necessary in pursuit of a championship. He will earn $14.5 million over the next two seasons, with the opportunity to opt out after 2023.
Ottavino is coming off of arguably the best full season of his career and a major rebound from his previous two years. From 2013 to ’19, he had a 2.90 ERA and 3.34 FIP as one of the only pitchers who could figure out the nightmare of Coors Field. He spent 2020 with the Yankees and ’21 with the Red Sox, where his performance declined a bit but his peripherals were still above average. His 2022, with a 2.05 ERA and 2.85 FIP, was certainly a return to form, but he did so with a newfound skill that he’s excelled in for the first time in his career: limiting walks.

For the first time since 2016, Ottavino had a single-digit walk rate, and in the span of just one offseason he went from dreadful (seventh percentile) to very good (77th percentile) at avoiding free passes. In addition to bringing his strikeout rate back to the level of his Rockies days, he posted the best full-season K-BB% of his career. Not only are these improvements impressive in the context of his own career, but the jump is also an outlier among all major league pitchers; between 2021 and ’22, only three other pitchers had their K-BB% improve more than Ottavino.
| Name | K-BB% Improvement |
|---|---|
| José Alvarado | 18.3% |
| Edwin Díaz | 16.9% |
| A.J. Minter | 12.4% |
| Adam Ottavino | 11.4% |
| Michael King | 11.3% |
| Sam Hentges | 10.3% |
| Griffin Jax | 10.0% |
| Andrew Heaney | 9.8% |
| Jesús Luzardo | 9.8% |
| Steve Cishek | 8.9% |
So what did Ottavino do to halve his walk rate in just one year? Back in August, Justin Choi looked into this exact question and came up with some possible answers, outlining two key differences: improvements in slider command and chase rates.
Let’s talk about the slider first. In terms of pure stuff, Ottavino checks off every single data-driven box with this pitch. His cross-bodied delivery gives him an extreme release point, and he fires off his sliders with 2,700 rpm of spin, leading to the second-most horizontal sweep and fifth-most extreme horizontal approach angle of anyone who threw at least 300 sliders in 2022. Last season, he was able to refine his command of this pitch by keeping it on his glove-side and fading away from right-handed hitters; in previous years, it often backed up, leaking to his arm-side and losing many of the characteristics that make it effective. You can see it in the pitch heat maps below: In 2021, there’s a large blob right around the middle of the zone, but in ’22, the slider was on the outer edge of the plate.

Ottavino executed his slider far better last season, but that didn’t actually result in more pitches being thrown in the strike zone. In fact, his 2022 zone rate of 41% was the second-lowest of his career, but his walk rate still plummeted. That’s because, as Justin pointed out in his piece, avoiding walks is far more complicated than just throwing strikes. Getting hitters to swing at pitches outside the zone (chase rate) has a stronger correlation to walks than throwing strikes (zone rate). For example, the two starting pitchers with the lowest zone rate in 2022, José Quintana and Corbin Burnes, walked fewer hitters than the league average. Just like his walk rate, Ottavino’s chase rate improved from terrible to quite good in just one year; 2022 was his first full season in the Statcast era with a chase rate above the 13th percentile.
Some of this improvement in chase rate is likely due to Ottavino’s command improvements, as he threw fewer sliders that were easy to take. But much of it can be attributed to the tunneling of his pitch arsenal, especially with his sinker and slider. If you’ve been on the internet long enough, you’ve probably seen a video like this:
Adam Ottavino, 94mph Two Seamer and 82mph Slider, Overlay. pic.twitter.com/J8zs2EAo6P
— Rob Friedman (@PitchingNinja) October 4, 2022
It’s beautiful: two pitches with similar trajectories diverging significantly out of the hand — 34 inches horizontally, to be exact (using Ottavino’s 2022 averages). But this isn’t exactly what pitch tunneling is. His two main pitches do have mirrored horizontal movement, but they actually tunnel poorly because both have significant differences that make them easily identifiable out of the hand, explaining his poor chase rates throughout his career.
Ottavino made a few slight pitch mix changes to improve his pitch tunnels and thereby his chase rate. First, he threw four-seam fastballs, a pitch that he largely shelved from 2018 to ’20, alongside his sinkers. Additionally, he made tweaks to the shape and usage of his cutter. Cutters can help sinkers tunnel better with sweeping sliders, because hitters can’t sit on one movement type or the other if there’s a hybrid pitch with a movement profile somewhere in the middle. Ottavino only threw 55 cutters in 2022, but he used them much more strategically than in years past; previously only used against right-handed hitters, he threw them to lefties as well to bridge the extreme movements of his two primary pitches. Furthermore, his cutter averaged 29.4 inches of vertical drop, a couple of inches more than any non-Coors season of his career. This helped match the downer action of his sinker and slider, allowing him to raise his slider chase rate by over 10%. That improvement in chase rate led to an improvement in results on contact; both his sinker and slider registered an xwOBA below .250, the first time he’s done so in a full season.
With a more diverse and cohesive arsenal developed over the last season, Ottavino’s only noticeable weakness is his performance against left-handed hitters, who slashed .301/.358/.479 against him — quite similar to the full-season performance of his teammate Starling Marte (.292/.347/.468). While Ottavino reduced the use of his platoon-heavy offerings (sinker, slider) against lefties, the deception that he generates against righties through his delivery and unusual release point make it easier for lefties to see his pitches, generating a large split. He tried to turn to his changeup against opposite-handed hitters, using it at a career-high rate (20.5%), but it was ineffective despite above-average movement characteristics because he lacked feel for location, landing it in the strike zone less than 20% of the time.
The good news is that the Mets can deploy Ottavino more selectively against righty-heavy lineups in the upcoming season. While he served as the primary eighth-inning man in front of Díaz in 2022, New York now has more late-inning options, allowing Buck Showalter to play matchups more strategically. David Robertson’s cutter and curveball give him a career reverse split, and left-handed reliever Brooks Raley held fellow southpaws to a sub-.500 OPS last season. Combined with Díaz, the four make an excellent squad of high-leverage relievers who can handle any matchup.
| Handedness | ERA | xERA | K-BB% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin Díaz | R | 97 | 100 | 100 |
| David Robertson | R | 83 | 81 | 50 |
| Adam Ottavino | R | 86 | 97 | 85 |
| Brooks Raley | L | 63 | 88 | 71 |
This group is clearly talented, especially at limiting the quality of contact off of opponents’ bats. All four relievers rank in the 90th percentile or better in expected slugging, and they should be a huge boost to a bullpen whose only big weakness last year was the long ball (they ranked 22nd in HR/9). Even with a payroll now sitting at an estimated $376 million, Steve Cohen and the Mets seem to have no plans to stop spending, and Ottavino should bolster a bullpen that already has no shortage of high-leverage arms.
Kyle is a FanGraphs contributor who likes to write about unique players who aren't superstars. He likes multipositional catchers, dislikes fastballs, and wants to see the return of the 100-inning reliever. He's currently a college student studying math education, and wants to apply that experience to his writing by making sabermetrics more accessible to learn about. Previously, he's written for PitcherList using pitch data to bring analytical insight to pitcher GIFs and on his personal blog about the Angels.
But wait!!! There’s more….
This is like the 20th most interesting story on the Mets right now, and Correa is involved in at least 10 of the stories ahead of this one.
Please tell me Shirtless Bartolo Colon is next….
Spolier: Cohen’s buying him some shirts
Cohen’s rich. But he’s not THAT rich…
Somebody say “sliders”?
Aaand your payroll number is already outdated. Steve Cohen with the blatant disregard for your publishing schedule.
Blatant disregard for a lot of things. We now have something like 6 of the top 10 shortstops on two teams.
If you go by last year’s values…yeah, it’s crazy. Lindor was #1, Swanson was #2, Bogaerts was #4, Correa was #9, Hoerner was #10, Kim was #11.
Cronenworth didn’t get enough innings at shortstop to show up on the list last year, but he did play 9 games there and slots in right between Correa and Hoerner. Three teams have 6 of the top 12 shortstops in MLB from 2022. Of course, then we would put Gimenez on there, so it would 6 of the top 13.
And that doesn’t include Tatis or Machado, who would both be in there pretty easily if they hadn’t already moved off the position for reasons unrelated to their ability to play it well.
Will their payroll reach 350+ million
MLBTR has it at $386m including luxury tax.
That doesn’t include the luxury tax. With the luxury tax, the Mets are at $500M.
Easily. Better question is, will it reach $400M?
Do I hear $500M?
I mean, the Mets could use an
international airportShohei Ohtani.Side bet: Will the NYMs pay more in CBT tax than the Pirates pay for their entire roster?
We do love to shit on the Pirates. Given that the Mets’ current CBT number looks to be over $100 mil I don’t suspect Pittsburgh will be the only team to find themselves spending less on payroll than the Mets spend on overage
The answer is yes. The Mets luxury tax is now a little over $110M, which is higher than the entire payrolls of 6 or 7 teams, including the Pirates.
Looking back, I think it’s pretty shocking that the other MLB owners approved Cohen. He’s just really making them look bad (and for the record, I am not a fan of him of what he is doing, nor him as a person).
I’m more of fan of what he’s doing to try to win it all not so much a fan of cheapskates like Dolan, Nutting, Reinsdorf and many many other owners.
I don’t disagree – those owners could spend quite a bit more than they do and still be in the black. They can’t spend anywhere near $400m, though.
I’m not trying to start a fight here, but you’re not a fan of him trying to win and improve his team?
I’m not a fan of billionaire owners pocketing revenue sharing and refusing to invest in their teams, but to each their own…
Let’s put it this way. When the Wilpons owned the Mets and thought signing Hector Santiago was a big off-season signing, I wasn’t getting mad at the Yankees and Dodgers ownership groups. I was getting mad at the Wilpons.
At the same time, could the other clubs really afford to spend $500M on their payroll like Cohen will this year? Sure the other teams could spend more than they are but I really doubt $500M is something other clubs could do without losing money on the team.
And there is something to be said about trying to keep some sort of level playing field. The Mets are now going to spend at least twice as much as both the Braves and Phillies (who are both in the top 6 in payrolls themselves) and about 6 times as much as the Nationals. Is that really an even playing field? It’s starting to get comical.
The reason you can’t say what the owners COULD spend is because they’ve always been secretive with their books, intentionally misrepresenting revenue. We honestly have no idea whether $500 million is a prohibitive payroll level or not. Blame comical spending on the bottom spending teams and owners solely. They all have the option to absorb 1 of these contracts. If they refuse to engage in market value for free agents, should no other team sign them? Or should we artificially depress salaries for the sake of keeping a level playing field? Because that doesn’t work.
I’d guess the Mets are still profitable even with a payroll approaching 400m, and the Yankees and Dodgers (at least) can easily afford to play in that 400-500m range and still make money. Smaller market teams are SOL, but what else is new. Not really Cohen’s fault – someone had to break the mega-market spending detante we’ve seen over the last decade or so.
You got that right! The next question is going to be what they do to turn their surplus players into, I guess, additional bullpen arms and/or prospects. Other front offices should be thinking about whether they’re interested in picking up 20-50% of the tab on Escobar, Carrasco, McCann, etc.
Hope Drew Rucinski gets an in-depth article, given how well he played in Korea. I also have a soft spot for him considering I know him irl, so hopefully he gets his due now that he’s been signed.