Can Oakland mean a Revival for Andy LaRoche?

Simply looking at Andy LaRoche’s player page, it’s easy to see why the Pittsburgh Pirates non-tendered the third baseman this season. For the second time in three seasons, the younger A. LaRoche was significantly below replacement. In both of those seasons, LaRoche posted a 50 or lower wRC+, a completely useless performances at the plate. Although LaRoche certainly wasn’t bad with the leather, an average-fielding third baseman with no bat gives a team no reason to retain him. For that reason, it’s also no surprise that the best LaRoche could manage was a minor league contract, which he received from the Oakland Athletics last Monday.

For all the reasons mentioned above and more, LaRoche will turn 28 next season, and his career could be over almost before it started. But┬ádespite how disgusting his 2008 and 2010 seasons were, LaRoche is only one year removed from posting a 2.6 WAR season. In 2009, LaRoche put together a .258/.330/.401 line with solid defense at third base, showing just some of the potential that was evident during his time in the minor leagues. In his age 22 and 23 seasons, between AA and AAA, LaRoche posted a wOBA above .400. with great peripheral numbers. His walk rates were always above 10%, his ISOs above .200, and his strikeout rates under 15%. Although his peripherals aren’t nearly as good at the MLB level, they’re better than his overall line would indicate. The problem so far is a dreadful .252 BABIP, a mark which still can’t be taken as true talent despite 902 career balls in play.

Five years later, LaRoche is dangerously close to inheriting the dreaded “bust” label. To avoid that label, he first needs a chance to start again, and as long as Kevin Kouzmanoff is in Oakland, that probably won’t happen, and rightly so. But as much as any of the multitude of minor league signings this week┬áduring the dog days of winter, I feel that Andy LaRoche could make an impact at the MLB level. Although he may never get over the BABIP issues that have suppressed his bat, it’s worth investigating on a minor league flyer. With a glove that plays at third base, the kind of bat that he displayed in the minors and in 2009 would make him a useful player – if not a potentially useful starter – at the big league level.

We hoped you liked reading Can Oakland mean a Revival for Andy LaRoche? by Jack Moore!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.

newest oldest most voted
Heyward
Guest
Heyward

He is “close” to being labeled a bust? No I think he is already there. Too bad there was so much potential there

CircleChange11
Guest
CircleChange11

Seems like another 4A player. His only positive war season was due to defense and position. The guy cannot ( or “has not yet” if you’re into motivational speaking) hit ML pitching.

The guy basically cruised to the major leagues, all the while as the younger brother of a ML player.

So, not only is he trying to learn to hit ML pitching, but also how to deal with it not being easy (relatively speaking).

Playing for the Pirates is an automatic motivation killer in itself. Be interesting to see how he does for a different team.