Carlos Beltran Moves Right, Angel Pagan Slides Center

It’s not easy admitting you’re no longer the person you used to be. This is something that all of us, no matter our profession, struggle with; we all get old and our skills deteriorate, and it takes a large amount self awareness and humility to gracefully deal with this fact. Many people go kicking and screaming into their forties, and pride can keep us from acknowledging our declining skills. I’m still young! Of course I can train for a marathon! Reality, though, can sometimes beg to differ.

While everyone sees their body, memory, and skills decline over time, very few of us make our living based on our physical ability. Very few of us have to acknowledge to a national audience that we’re getting older and declining, and that a younger person is better at our job than we are. This fact may be obvious to outside viewers, but on a personal level, that’s a difficult admission to make.

However, this morning Carlos Beltran did just that: he told manager Terry Collins he’s ready to switch to playing right field, allowing Angel Pagan to roam center field in his stead. At this point in his career, Beltran moving to right field is the best move for the Mets and, yes, Beltran too.

Not only is Beltran getting old – he’s turning 34 in less than a month – but he’s suffered through knee issues since 2009. He had surgery to repair his knee in January of 2010, and while he recovered enough to play in 64 games this past season, he was far from himself. His bat was just barely above average (.332 wOBA, 106 wRC+) and his defense in center field has declined as a result of his knee issues. While before he was a +5 to +10 defender in center, over limited action the last two seasons he’s looked more like a -5 to -10 defender. Even at his worst he was still a better than average center fielder (0.9 WAR in 64 games is nothing to shake a fist at), but he was a far cry from his 7.1 WAR self from 2008.

By moving to right field, Beltran is providing himself with the best possible situation to improve his value before hitting free agency after this season. His defensive performance should improve in a corner; players typically see a +10 UZR improvement moving out of center field, which means Beltran could be an average to above-average right fielder. His knee will have less stress put on it, and offensively…well, that all depends on his knee’s health and how his bat rebounds. For him to be a 3-4 WAR player in right field, though, all he has to do is post a .340-.350 wOBA while playing average defense. And if Beltran’s bat rebounds back up into the .370 wOBA range, then we’re talking a 4-5 WAR season and a place as one of the top 10 right fielders in the game.

With Beltran in right field, the Mets can now field their most optimal defensive outfield. Angel Pagan will get full control of center field, the best position for him and the place where he helps the Mets most. Pagan is a speedy, defensive whiz; over the course of around 1,300 innings in center over the last two seasons, Pagan has posted impressive defensive scores in all of the major defensive metrics (around an 8 UZR/150, 10 TZL, and 7 DRS). He also profiles better offensively as a centerfielder, as most center fielders have weak bats and he’s projected to post a .340 wOBA this upcoming season.

We’ve come to expect so much from Carlos Beltran, but sadly it seems as though his best years are behind him. Despite this, though, he can still be a valuable player to the Mets this season, and the combination of him and Pagan patrolling the deep confines of Citi Field should be a helpful duo for Mets pitchers (I’m sure flyballer Chris Young will be happy). And who knows, maybe his knee will get better and he’ll reignites his career. It’s still Spring Training, so I can’t help but hope.





Piper was the editor-in-chief of DRaysBay and the keeper of the FanGraphs Library.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CircleChange11
13 years ago

Better to request the move, than have it forced on you.

Beltran was very good with KC … very good … before busting out into full star mode in 2004 (especially the post-season) and then went on a tear from 2005-2009 (25.6 WAR), despite some ups and downs. 5 years averaging 5+ WAR/season.

2009 = 3.1 WAR, 81 games
2010 = 1.8 WAR, 64 games

He’s still a very productive player. He isn’t a healthy player.

Moving to RF should help his health. It’s a good move all the way around.

CircleChange11
13 years ago

Yeah, I had the BR page open to look at his 2004 post-season stats. Uh, WOW.

Using bWAR, from 2005 to 2009, he racked up 26.6 WAR.

2009 = 4.4 bWAR in 81 games
2010 = 1.8 bWAR in 64 games.

His “decline” seems pretty standard to me. He’ll bounce back here and there and have a 4 WAR season, followed by a 2 WAR half-season, then a 3.5 WAR season, etc … pretty much averaging 0.5 WAR/y decline as most do.

We often hear of the “0.5 WAR/y decline path” and think that it’s gradual. It isn’t. It’s an average. meaning some above, some below. I wouldn;t imagine that many guys gradually decline, but eventually get tired of being injured and/or alternating good with bad seasons, and call it a day (Rehabbing can only be so much fun).

I don;t think we should look at his career as a sad story. Dude has been a monster. He hurt his knee. That’s usually how it starts. The guys that make it through careers without major injury are the vast exceptions.

As a cardinal fan, I’ll always remember the demon he was during the 2004 playoffs … which made Wainwright posterizing his @$$ (Yeah, I said it) in 2006, all that more special.

I lived in KC up to 2001. At that time everyone was Johnny Damon crazy, while I kept pointing out that Beltran was far superior. At the time I thought it was a race thing, or that Johnny Damon looked to be the “next George Brett” type (until Alex Gordon was). Damon turned out to be much better than I thought he would be. Beltran was 5-tools right from the start. Not “Cameron Maybin” 5 tools, but legit 5-tools.

Eric
13 years ago
Reply to  CircleChange11

“He’s still a very productive player. He isn’t a healthy player.”

I think this is the key (and much more important than the decline discussions) – if he stays healthy, he’ll be productive (perhaps not all-star-level productive as he was as a positive defensive CF, but certainly well above average). If he’s not healthy, it’s a complete crapshoot