Checking in on Tyler Chatwood

One of the more interesting deals of the most recent offseason was the Cubs’ three-year, $38 million pact with former Rockies swingman Tyler Chatwood. On the one hand, Chatwood had some virtues as a pitcher. On the other, in an offseason during which nearly every free agent received less than expected, Chatwood got $8 million more than Dave Cameron projected in his examination of the 2017-18 class.

Back in December, Eno Sarris wrote for this site that Chatwood, despite his apparent flaws, might be an adjustment or two away from a Rich Hill-type breakout.

You’ve heard of “spin-rate guys,” right? Well, Chatwood is absolutely a spin-rate guy. What’s interesting, though, is that he hasn’t converted that high spin into plus movement. Why? Well, it might have something to do with useful spin. Over time, Chatwood has dropped his arm slot to get more movement on his sinker and more ground balls, probably because he pitched in Coors. That robs his fastball of ride, though, and his curveball of downward movement.

An easy fix might be to just throw the curveball more. He only threw it 11% of the time in 2017. It got over 70% ground balls and above-average whiffs. Batters had a .164 slugging percentage against it last year. And that fits with the spin and movement on the pitch.

With about a quarter of the season in the books, now seems like a good time to check whether that adjustment has come and how the Cubs have fared on their investment.

Chatwood’s season, if nothing else, has been interesting so far. First, the good. Chatwood has a 3.14 earned run average and 80 ERA- across eight starts and an even 43 innings. He’s striking out 21.5% of hitters, a career high in the big leagues. He remains a tremendous ground-ball generator, with a 51.4% mark, and he’s also induced infield flies at the highest rate of his career. He’s also suppressed home runs in unprecedented fashion, with a 0.21 HR/9 and 3% HR/FB. So, on some level, Chatwood has been a success this season…

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

… except that Chatwood’s home-run suppression is almost certainly not sustainable. And there’s also the matter of his walk rate. Chatwood is easily pacing all pitchers with 40 or more innings, having produced a staggering 18.3% mark. Those walks have meant that, despite the shiny ERA, Chatwood has managed just a 102 FIP- and 1.49 WHIP, the latter mark representing his worst since 2012.

Chatwood has yet to record a start without walking anybody, and he’s already compiled five starts of five or more walks. What that all adds up to is a 126 xFIP-. And even though Chatwood has a history of outperforming his fielding-independent numbers, it’s usually been on the order of 0.2 to 0.3 runs. Chatwood, meanwhile, has recorded an ERA nearly two full runs lower than his xFIP. All told, it appears as though Chatwood has gotten pretty lucky.

Also worrisome is the fact that, despite generating the one of the game’s better ground-ball rates, Chatwood is still not inducing much poor contact, with a 14% soft-hit rate. (League average is generally about 18%, while league leaders are currently in the 25-30% range.)

Perhaps in response to those flaws observed by Eno Sarris, Chatwood appears to have altered his release point early this season. The changes don’t appear to have held, however.

Here’s 2017, for example:

And 2018:

They’re pretty similar overall, with 2018 maybe a bit lower, if anything. An examination of video from 2017 and 2018 suggests that there’s maybe a little more short-arm action in the current mechanics; overall, though, his motion is pretty similar. Nor has the pitch mix changed all that much either: Chatwood is throwing his four-seamer at a career-low rate, but it’s a nominal difference (29% now vs. 34% last year) and sinkers are making up the difference. One interesting note is that Chatwood has actually declined usage of the one pitch, the curveball, which Sarris thought might benefit the right-hander. He’s usage of the pitch has dropped a few percentage points.

Perhaps what is most notable is who Chatwood is walking this year. Against lefties last year, Chatwood walked 14% of hitters compared to 10% of righties. In 2016, he walked more lefties than righties. For his career, Chatwood has walked 12.3% of lefties compared to 9.9% of righties. But this year, Chatwood’s flipped the script, walking everybody — 19.8% of righties and 16.8% of lefties. But Chatwood is striking out just 15.8% of lefties compared to 27.5% of righties. However, Chatwood has thrown 354 pitches to righties and 377 pitches to lefties this year, almost the same number. He has thrown 215 strikes (57%) to righties and 194 strikes to lefties (51.5%). So he’s still throwing fewer strikes to lefthanded batters.

So what does all this mean? The one bugaboo Chatwood had coming into this season — more than his spin rate, more than his contact rate — was his control. It’s always been below average, and though Eno didn’t talk about it much in his article, his control never played up away from Coors either: his career home walk rate (11.1%) and road walk rate (11.2%) are almost identical. And Chatwood has struggled like this before. Last year, for instance, Chatwood walked walked 16% of hitters last May and 17% of hitters last July, and 12.5% of hitters away from Coors – not as bad as this year, mind you, but still not great.

So Tyler Chatwood is the same as he always was, really. Tyler Chatwood away from Coors had control problems, and so Tyler Chatwood the Cub has control problems. His walk rate likely won’t stay this high, but then he won’t keep suppressing homers at this rate. Chatwood is probably something close to the league-average starter his FIP says he is. That’s not a revolutionary take, but then, maybe Chatwood was never really a revolutionary pitcher.





Sheryl Ring is a litigation attorney and General Counsel at Open Communities, a non-profit legal aid agency in the Chicago suburbs. You can reach her on twitter at @Ring_Sheryl. The opinions expressed here are solely the author's. This post is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

Me, looking at that walk rate:

: – O

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

A fun part of small-sample theater (for me, maybe not for others) is seeing how it compares to more-or-less full season performance. Here are the highest single-season walk rates since 1990, minimum 100 IP, starters only

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=all&qual=100&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=1990&ind=1&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=11,d

A walk down memory lane–fun to see how many names repeat.

YKnotDisco
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The one I like is 2009 Kershaw: 13% BB% resulting in 4.4 WAR over 171 innings. Using BB% instead of BB/9 (4.79) puts him at #49 on the list.

danMember since 2015
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That Randy Johnson guy could’ve had a great career if not for those walks.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  dan

Randy Johnson was every ridiculously tall fireballer with control problems until 1993. It’s why no one wants to give up on Tyler Glasnow.

But man, even then, when he was wild…I still remember John Kruk’s reaction in the ASG after Johnson threw one right over his head.

Mark Davidson
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sorting this “leaderboard” by K-BB% is also pretty neat.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago

He always was a bad K-bb guy. People hoped for an uptick in Ks due to a solid breaking ball working better out of coors and it has been a little better but the walks are up too.

I don’t think 18% will stick but 12-13 is probably realistic, with a 21% k rate that is not great.

However he is a ground ball pitcher albeit this is down a little too and his career era is 0.3 below his fip so there might be some skill, similar to his teammate Montgomery who has a similar profile (so cubs might like it) but with a single digit k-bb there is not much room for error.

CC AFCMember since 2016
8 years ago

“So Tyler Chatwood is the same as he always was, really.”

After signing his big contract and finding himself in the shotgun shack of Wrigley, and behind the wheel of the large automobile and living in the beautiful house he purchased with his signing bonus, living with his beautiful wife, I imagine he asks himself: well, how did I get here?

(I’ll show myself out)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

My God! What has he done?

Mark Davidson
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Hitters choir chimes in: “Letting the balls go by, I’ve got the red light on three oh”

gillumMember since 2018
8 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Same as he ever was

darttalk
8 years ago

I don’t know many innings you’ve watched this year, but his stuff is pretty filthy.

MikeSMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  darttalk

So is Carson Fullmer’s. He just got optioned to AAA. Doesn’t matter how much it moves if you don;t have a clue where it is going.

Dave TMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

Yes, and however filthy his stuff might appear, it doesn’t really come through in looking at swing and contact percentages.

Overall contact percentage against Chatwood is above league average this year (80.4% versus 76.8%). O-Swing % against him is below league average (23.2% vs. 29.9%). So, by and large, he doesn’t do a good job of getting swings and misses, perhaps in part because he doesn’t a good job getting hitters to chase pitches out of the zone.

Joe
8 years ago

Sheryl, how dare you suggest a baseball player is still the same baseball player outside of Coors field!

the0ba1d
8 years ago

He continues to be the same highly variable pitcher who hasn’t been able, with the Angels or Rockies, to convert considerable talent into consistent performance. Difference is he’s on a big market team and gets a resulting big salary. Other part of Cubs-Rockies free agent exchange, Wade Davis, has been awfully consistent. 159 fip and 17 saves over first 48 games. NL is weaker this year, so Rockies have decent shot at 90+ wins.

the0ba1d
8 years ago
Reply to  the0ba1d

Should read Davis has 1.58 WPA. Too many acronyms in my life….

O'KieboomerMember since 2021
8 years ago

I thought this was a really nice article. A bit of criticism that I hope will come thru as constructive as I intend: in the third-to-last paragraph discussing walk and strikeout rates year-over-year (2017/2018) by handedness, it would have been helpful to present as a short table rather than writing all those numbers in prose form. I found it slightly confusing to compare, at least without going back and re-reading a couple times. Again, thanks for writing up Chatwood who has certainly had an interesting start to the year. I can’t say I’ll be rooting for him to do anything but keep walking guys and having success because that’d be hilarious.

Dave TMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  O'Kieboomer

It would he hilarious, but I think that the likely way these good results from Chatwood end is pretty logical from his stat line this year.

He’s allowing a lot of baserunners with his double digit career walk percentage, never mind this year’s 18.3% walk rate. At some point that 3.0% HR/FB rate won’t hold (league average this year is 12.5%, for comparison), so some of those walks will start turning into multi-run homers.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago

That release point spread is a good foot-plus wide, is he a guy who varies his arm slot deliberately?

Actually that 2018 release point plot is quite weird. The long axis is horizontal. Usually it’s tilted perpendicular to the arm slot, because varying the angle while keeping the arm length is the action. This looks like he’s extending his arm less as he angles more over-the-top. Who’s been watching him do this?

ryanredsox
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

Maybe he’s been changing where he stands on the rubber?

Michaer
8 years ago

Speaking strictly as a Cubs fan. Despite the walks, he’s still more enjoyable to watch than John Lackey. There are certainly worse things than having your 5th starter be a league average starter.

Free Clay Zavada
8 years ago

And then there he goes, walking 6 dudes in less than 3 innings tonight.

Cubslol
8 years ago

That Theo Epstein sure is a genius isn’t he?