Chris Sale Is Pitching to Contact Now

I was talking with my father about Miguel Cabrera recently, and about how he’s undeniably one of the best hitters either of us have ever seen. One of the things we found so fascinating is that Miggy has seemingly never had to adjust. He’s got this approach, and that approach has been damn near unbeatable going on 14 years now. He’s been waiting, and waiting, and waiting some more for pitchers to exploit him, but there is no exploiting Miguel Cabrera, so he just keeps doing what he’s always been doing. Over the last decade, Cabrera’s swing rate’s always been between 46% and 51%. The contact rate’s always between 79% and 83%. The pull rate, always between 35% and 41%. Ground-ball rate, never wavering from the 39% to 42% range. There’s sure to have been little tweaks here and there, but for the most part, Miguel Cabrera’s been adjustment-free more than a decade, and he’s one of the greatest hitters of all time.

Of course, Miguel Cabrera is the exception. Seriously, the exception. Mike Trout‘s had to adjust. Bryce Harper’s had to adjust. Hell, even Clayton Kershaw spends some of his off time looking for another piece. Everyone in baseball is adjusting, constantly, which benefits their own employment status as well as mine.

You know Chris Sale as one of baseball’s very best pitchers. Over the last two-plus years, he’s got baseball’s second-best strikeout-walk differential, third-best FIP, fourth-best ERA, and fifth-best xFIP. He’s no Kershaw, but it’s very simple to make the argument that he’s the next-best guy. But Sale’s not content with the next-best guy. Just like Trout and Harper weren’t content with where they were, Sale wants Kershaw status. I’d guess that Sale, personally, has no doubts he can get there.

And so Sale’s made an adjustment. It’s always tough to tell, especially this early in the season, whether the changes we’re seeing in a player’s process are intentional or moreso a product of their environment. It becomes a lot easier to cipher out when the player comes out and lets us know it’s the former. Chris Sale, the American League’s greatest strikeout artist, made a conscious decision to become a more contact-oriented pitcher, and he’s doing it.

Per CBS Chicago’s Bruce Levine, in March:

In order to micromanage his pitch selection and pitch count, Sale’s working in a new direction with pitching coach Don Cooper. In late January, he met with Cooper to define his pitching methods going forward this year. The two had a meeting of the minds on using more pitches that would create early contact and easier innings to get through.

“Chris has already been pitching to contact,” [starting pitcher John] Danks said. “The reality is his stuff is just to tough to hit. His issue isn’t throwing strikes, he already is trying to make them hit it. He is just that good, you can’t hit him. So that said, the only (thing to) tell him to pitch to contact is to throw it a little easier.”

Throw it a little easier. Sale’s average fastball velocity is down nearly 2 mph from last year, at its lowest point since 2012. Typically a cause for concern, maybe this is just part of the plan. Or maybe it really is a cause for concern.

Pitch to more contact. Sale’s contact rate is up eight percentage points from last year, the single largest increase by any qualified starter from last year to the next. Again: would typically be a cause for concern, but appears to be part of a plan.

Manage the pitch count, so as to work deeper into games. Only Kershaw’s thrown more innings than Sale this year. Prior to 2016, Sale’d managed 6.8 innings per start, this year, that’s up to 7.2. That’s way too small of a sample for there to be much in the way of significance, and that includes a complete-game shutout against the hyper-aggressive Rays, but there’s also eight innings against a patient and threatening Blue Jays lineup. At the very least, we can’t say Sale hasn’t accomplished his goal of working deeper, so far as we’ve seen. He’s certainly done that, and he’s certainly working with a new approach.

The new approach shows up in the way of Sale simply pitching more aggressive, both in the zone, and with his fastball. Sale’s in-zone rate is up five percentage points from last year, the third-largest increase of any qualified pitcher. He’s going with the fastball two-thirds of the time, whereas last year, he went with the fastball just half the time. Then there’s the difference in first-pitch selection, which is remarkable. Last year, half his plate appearances started out with something hard. This year, north of 70% have started with heat. It’s worth noting that his first-pitch strike percentage is down from last year, and unchanged from his career level, but he’s certainly become more aggressive in fresh counts. The fastball usage is up in two-strike counts, as well, and Sale’s less worried about elevating it, and more focused on making sure he doesn’t waste any pitches:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

15_2Strike_FB copy

This reminds me of something I wrote a couple years back, because it’s the same approach David Price uses. The thing that caught my eye about the way Price pitched was how many three-pitch strikeouts he racked up, and when I dove in a bit further, I found that the majority of Price’s three-pitch strikeouts went fastball, fastball, fastball. When most pitchers get ahead 0-2, they toy around with some breaking stuff around the zone, and they’re fine if they end up wasting a couple pitches. When Price gets ahead 0-2, he does the same thing that got him to 0-2 in the first place, which is spot a fastball and see if the batter can hit it.

And that comes back to Danks’ quote, about how Sale’s stuff is essentially good enough to miss bats without trying, and it reminds me of the way another guy pitches: Max Scherzer. Scherzer routinely posts one of the highest in-zone fastball rates in the league, because Scherzer doesn’t need to mess around with his fastball. A Scherzer fastball right down the middle is just as effective as plenty of other pitcher’s fastballs spotted on the edges. Even with this new fastball approach, Sale’s got one of the best whiff rates on the pitch of any pitcher in baseball, because it’s the kind of pitch that can be blown past Mike Trout in a 2-0 count, thrown right down the middle:

The elephant in the room here is Sale’s batting average on balls in play, which rests at .207, nearly 100 points below his career norm. His batted-ball distribution hasn’t much changed, a cursory glance of his pitch location doesn’t reveal much, and while his average exit velocity allowed is better than average, it isn’t remarkable, so it’s difficult to see where this sudden hit suppression is coming from. Maybe the new, aggressive approach has hitters uncomfortable. He’s getting more hitters to pull the ball, so maybe that means more grounders into the shift. Or, perhaps most believably, Sale’s benefited from some favorable batted-ball locations.

It’s tough to know how to feel about that, on account of how conditioned we all are to praise the strikeout. Almost always, you’d take the 30% strikeout version of a pitcher over the 20% strikeout version of a pitcher. And then you catch a whiff of the BABIP, and you shriek, “Give me back my old Chris Sale!” At the same time, Sale is very clearly doing an excellent job of executing the approach he and Don Cooper laid out before the season, and it’s difficult to argue against what Don Cooper and Chris Sale think is best for Chris Sale. They’re getting what they asked for.





August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.

38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James
10 years ago

The beauty of this is, if those batted balls start finding soft spots on the field, Sale can always revert back to his approach from previous years – or at least some incarnation of that – with great success.

Concerned Reader John
10 years ago
Reply to  James

Very true, he still has the whole 11 ks per 9 innings thing in his back pocket. The other night I watched him hit an unfortunate Mark Trumbo in the kneecap with a slider. Even more unfortunate for Mr. Trumbo was the fact that he had swung and missed at that slider.

NickyHatton
10 years ago

Yeah that Trumbo K-pitch was ridiculous. The pitch came in basically on the outer left side of the plate, then broke late so far inside that it actually hit him on his right knee. And Trumbo swung through it for strike 3

MikeSMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  James

I think that is the plan: Nobody on base, get early, weak contact. Guys on base, get nasty. We’ll see if it works when some guys get on base.

Cyril Morong
10 years ago

This year he has walked 5.56% of batters faced. Last year it was 4.92%. That seems strange if his in zone rate is up. He has also only hit one batter so far while he was over 10 in each of the last three years (14-11-13)

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  Cyril Morong

His last start is skewing it a bit; he was all over the place and didn’t have his good stuff or his release point. Prior to that he had a 22 inning stretch without a walk.

I don’t think you can underrate just how good the White Sox defense has been either. It’s easier for Sale, and to a lesser extent Quintana, to “pitch to contact” this year given that they have an elite defense behind them. Years prior they their BABIP’s were escalated and it was because of the porous defense behind them.

Cyril Morong
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

Thanks. Sounds like the White Sox philosophy from 1906 as Dan Levitt explained in “Paths to Glory.” Get great fielders and throw strikes.

Sox are tied for first in Defensive Efficiency Rating this year at .717. Last year they were last with .673

Bridgeport Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

Gerry Davis was also squeezing him something terrible. At least a couple of his walks featured two called balls that were in the zone.

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

The White Sox’s defensive improvement is entirely contingent upon Adam Eaton really being the best defensive right fielder in the game. Everywhere else they’re roughly the same as 2015 or even worse, such as second base where they went from having the league’s eighth best defender at the position (Carlos Sanchez) to the league’s second worst (Brett Lawrie). As expected, Todd Frazier has been better defensively than the appalling Mike Olt and Conor Gillaspie yet not as good defensively as Tyler Saladino or Gordon Beckham. Lawrie has always been awful defensively at second base, so the only surprising result thus far is Eaton.

Beel418Member since 2025
10 years ago

As a Sox fan, I’ve been concerned about Sale’s lack of strikeouts, but it’s hard to complain about his ERA thus far. Sox defense has improved a ton, so more balls in play is less concerning than it might have been last year, but I do kind of miss all the Ks.

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  Beel418

You’ve been concerned? Huh? It has clearly been a philosophical change. It is not as if he can’t strike people out anymore; he would rather go deep into the game. This was said to be the plan for the past 6 months.

The K’s are fun, but it escalated his pitch counts. It is not as if he can’t strike out 11/9 anymore; he just isn’t trying to anymore.

Concerned Reader John
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

I don’t think concern is unreasonable. He has been a top 5 pitcher for the last few years and he’s fundamentally altered his approach. He’s pitching to contact, and there is still a debate as to whether that is a sustainable approach – particularly in a hitters park like US Cellular. If the babip and hr/fb remain low, great, but it wouldn’t surprise me to see either number increase.

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

Not nibbling unnecessarily in order to suppress pitch counts is one thing. Allowing a career high contact rate is something else.

BranchRickey11937Member since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

Count me among the concerned. Talk about pitching to contact always precedes a pitcher’s decline. Give me an example of a whiff artist who changed his philosophy to pitching to contact and actually became more effective at preventing opponent runs.

Peter 2
10 years ago

Brandon Morrow 2012 comes to mind, though it’s hard to know if that was fluky or not (he had some injury issues that year and never really got healthy again)

shysocks
10 years ago

One reason for the lower BABIP is improved defense, particularly in the outfield. Last season’s RngR for the Sox was dead last, both overall and in the outfield. This season it is 20th overall and 9th in the outfield

durf
10 years ago
Reply to  shysocks

I was just about to post the same thing. Frazier at 3B has been very good too, but Eaton moving to RF and becoming the best defensive RFer in the league has been the biggest change for the Sox defense.

Bridgeport Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  durf

Yup. They went from below average at 3B, CF, and RF, to plus at 3B, above average at CF, and plus-plus in RF.

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

Actually, UZR has Austin Jackson as well below average so far, even worse than Eaton was in centerfield last season. The Sox have also had a massive downgrade from the 8th best defensive second baseman last season to the 2nd worst this season. As noted above, Frazier has been an improvement over Olt/Gillaspie yet worse than Saladino/Beckham in 2015. So the entirety of the defensive improvement is attributable to going from Garcia to Eaton.

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

No point in arguing with you bolick. People who watched the team see the difference. There are other metrics that disagree with you too.

Jackson has shaded melky way much of the year improving his defense. There is a CF to his right greatly reducing his perceived range. They lead baseball in defensive effecincy and that’s not because of Eaton only. They were last last year.

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

OK, I will delve into this a little deeper since you seem to be greatly misinformed or overly reliant on specific defensive metrics that have a lot of volatility tied to them for one full season; none the less 25 games.

The White Sox were dead last in defensive efficiency last year – this year, they are first. Last year they were third worst in BABIP against (.311) despite a good pitching staff. This year they are third best in BABIP against (.267).

If you think Adam Eaton is the sole reason for their defensive prowess – the sole reason they have converted the most balls into outs in baseball – then you are greatly mistaken.

Austin Jackson plays a very shallow center field; I would argue he should play a bit deeper, but the more shallow you play the worse you tend to grade out via UZR. Using UZR at all this early in the season is laughable; using it when your right fielder is a former Center Fielder and has immense range is even goofier. Jackson has been a huge addition to the teams defense; regardless of what UZR tells you.

In regards of Lawrie, he has been fine. He is not as good as Sanchez, I would admit that, but he’s not as bad as he is grading out either.

When it comes to Frazier vs Saladino and Beckham; Puhleeeze. Frazier has been dynamite at third. With the exception of Machado, he has been the best defensive third baseman in the AL. Beckham and Saladino were not as good as Frazier at third.

If you think the impact of Eaton in right field is the sole reason they have converted the most balls into outs, their BABIP had greatly decreased, and their defense has been stellar you are kidding yourself. You are too tied into defensive metrics that have mass volatility in small samples.

Mahoney
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

I do wonder if Jackson playing shallow means there are more balls deep to the right-centerfield gap that Eaton is catching instead of Jackson. That would put a few high DRS/UZR plays into his ledger as opposed to Jackson.

Either way, huge improvement in the White Sox OF.

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

Using UZR at all this early in the season is laughable; using it when your right fielder is a former Center Fielder and has immense range is even goofier. Jackson has been a huge addition to the teams defense; regardless of what UZR tells you.

The small sample is a reasonable criticism, but Jackson had a negative UZR in 2013 and 2014. He did rebound last season, but over the last three full seasons he has been more negative than positive. But let’s throw out UZR entirely just for the sake of your argument. DRS has Jackson as the second worst qualified center fielder this season, and rated him below average in 2014 and 2015 as well. He is not an asset defensively. Going from Avisail Garcia’s terrible performance in right field to Adam Eaton’s incredible performance there is why their outfield defense has changed so dramatically. We’ll see if Eaton can maintain this level.

In regards of Lawrie, he has been fine. He is not as good as Sanchez, I would admit that, but he’s not as bad as he is grading out either.

He really is, and as with Jackson, Lawrie’s poor ratings are consistent with his recent history. He was this bad defensively at second base for both Toronto and Oakland.

When it comes to Frazier vs Saladino and Beckham; Puhleeeze. Frazier has been dynamite at third. With the exception of Machado, he has been the best defensive third baseman in the AL.

Adrian Beltre would like to have a word with you.

Beckham and Saladino were not as good as Frazier at third.

They were not simply “as good as Frazier at third,” they were significantly better. That’s true with both UZR and DRS.

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

Bolick, you failed to address the Defensive Efficiency rating for the team as well as the significant BABIP reduction. That can not all be accredited to one defensive player.

MattabattacolaMember since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

I have watched and Jackson plays way too shallow. Maybe its been all luck (or the Sox finally embracing defensive positioning) but there have been a lot of balls right at people.

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

Bolick, you failed to address the Defensive Efficiency rating for the team as well as the significant BABIP reduction.

I am not at all familiar with “Defensive Efficiency rating,” so I could not comment intelligently about it. When I don’t know what I’m talking about, I have to keep my mouth shut. As for BABIP, we all know that’s heavily influenced by luck.

Maverik312
10 years ago
Reply to  shysocks

You all beat me to it, but I still have to say it. Praise Jebus for the Jackson Eaton combo and allowing Avi to get out of there

novaether
10 years ago

Also note that while Sales’s fastball velocity has been down, his maximum velocity fastball this year is still a ripe 98.1 mph, showing that he still has the ability to throw fast. I’d bet heavily that the slow-down is intentional rather than cause for concern.

Bridgeport Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  novaether

Yeah, I’ve been wondering if he’s adopting the old school approach and just throwing a 92 mph meatball down the middle to hitters who don’t have the power to do much damage with it.

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  Bridgeport Joe

He has been sinking the ball much more this year. He has been changing speeds on his fastball by design; he still has 98 in his back pocket, but I think Sale might feel he pushed himself too hard in the early going of games lately.

phoenix2042Member since 2016
10 years ago

The best part is that he can pitch to contact and save pitches against weaker hitters, but with runners on or a really scary bat at the plate, he can still turn it up a notch and get the strikeouts he needs to escape a jam.

Example: With the bases empty, a batted ball out is the same as a K, so why waste the pitches? With the bases loaded and one out, a K is a lot better than a batted ball out (except GIDP of course).

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  phoenix2042

While that is true, not all batted balls are going to be outs whereas all strikeouts (minus freak passed balls) are going to be outs, and Sale has not previously demonstrated any BABIP suppressing ability.

Rational FanMember since 2025
10 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Maybe because he had the worst defense in baseball behind him the past couple years. Jaysus.

phoenix2042Member since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I agree. I’m not saying that balls in play are worth as much as strikeouts. I’m trying to express that there may be a cascading effect to having a lower pitch count so that he is fresher later in the game. At the same time, he still have strikeout ability because this is a choice. He is not just a less talented or able bodied pitcher. So if he really needed a K, he could still get it. Plus maybe “pitching easier” could keep him healthier? That’s just guesswork though.

MattabattacolaMember since 2026
10 years ago

I would say Sale’s new approach is to pitch to contact as long as it works. As many of you have said he has the strikeout stuff in his back pocket, he just hasn’t had to use it. That seems to be a product of some good luck, but also a much improved defense behind him. Either way, we all know Sale is going to do whatever it takes to win and if he has to, he will throw 98 and strikeout everybody…
The way the first month has gone he is just coasting and its a thing of beauty.

redsoxu571
10 years ago

I find it rather inappropriate to use Trout and Harper as counterexamples to Cabrera’s decade of not having to make adjustments. Cabrera has indeed been a rock over the past decade, but virtually EVERY stat you cite for him fell OUTSIDE of the cited range early in his career. In other words, Cabrera hasn’t had to make adjustments *since he settled into his groove in his career*, not that he’s never had to make major adjustments ever.

Cabrera was a very young super talent, and Trout and Harper are the same. It’s always amazing to remember this, but they’re basically only just entering the start of what could be the same kind of “settled in” period that Cabrera did. It’s unlikely that they will go adjustment free, but you would have been better off presenting more seasoned examples of your point.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
10 years ago

Velocity down? Strikeouts down? Contact rate up? I would not call that pitching to contact but instead be a little worried about him. Yes the Era is great but he did have some Babip luck.

He won’t maintain a 200 Babip and 84% Strand rate.

Don’t get me wrong, he still is an excellent pitcher but losing velocity and strikeouts is not a good sign if it is going to stay.

Swfcdan
10 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

He’s not losing velocity he’s choosing to do it. Pitchers dont have to got 100% max effort on every pitch you know, you can choose to put less effort into it. Sale seems to be throwing his fastball at 80% effort this year, until he needs to up it. As an owner last year, I always felt he went max out all the time which kept his innings totals down, this way will pitch deeper into games and keep him healthier long term.