Cleveland Hires Manny Acta

The Cleveland Indians’ managerial hunt ended on Sunday, as they hired former Washington Nationals skipper Manny Acta. Acta will replace Eric Wedge, who in six seasons as manager of the Indians compiled a .495 winning percentage and reached the playoffs once (in 2007).

Acta managed for two and a half years in Washington, managing teams with very little in terms of talent. Over his tenure, the Nationals played putrid .385 ball, including a 59 win season in 2008 and a 26-61 record at the time of his firing in 2009. Despite his poor record, Acta has a fantastic reputation around the game with young players. As Cleveland enters the Manny Acta era, they will need these talents as they attempt to build around established players like Grady Sizemore and Shin-Soo Choo with prospects like Matt LaPorta and Carlos Carrasco.

Other candidates for the job included former Mets and Chiba Lotte Marines manager Bobby Valentine, Indians AAA manager Torey Lovullo, and Dodgers hitting coach Don Mattingly. Valentine is the only other candidate with ML managerial experience (Mattingly has never managed a professional team). Valentine reached one World Series with the Mets in 2000 but has an otherwise unimpressive record, with a .510 career winning percentage, and was ousted as part of the Steve Phillips era in New York. With Cleveland in the middle of a rebuilding period, he may not have fit well with their current personnel.

The most interesting thing about Acta besides his reputation with young players is his affinity for statistical analysis. In an interview with Squawking Baseball after the 2007 season, Acta told of his disdain for the sacrifice bunt early in games, and how Baseball Prospectus was among his favorite baseball reading.

More importantly, though, Acta’s openness towards statistics will not lead to tension between the manager and the front office. Mark Shapiro and his staff certainly are not stuck in the dark ages with regards to new forms of analysis. Would a manager like Bobby Valentine or Don Mattingly have conflicted with the front office in terms of player acquisitions, or perhaps on in-game strategies? It’s hard to say for sure. Acta, however, seems to have the perfect profile for a team looking to rebuild and willing to use advanced analyses.

Although Cleveland has pieces to build around, they do not appear to have the talent of a competing team as of yet. With the hiring of Manny Acta, the Indians have somebody who has both a great reputation among baseball men and an appreciation for the analytical part of the game that has created winners in Oakland and Boston, and is currently turning a franchise around in Seattle. Acta won’t bring the Indians to contention by himself, but he’s the right man to guide the ship.

We hoped you liked reading Cleveland Hires Manny Acta by Jack Moore!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs

Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.

newest oldest most voted

For a guy who has a statistical reputation, the guy did not manage at all by the stats. Nothing in sabermetrics indicated that it was a good idea to start Austin Kearns and his .195 BA ahead of Elijah Dukes. Those stats should have told him that it was a terrible idea to give 28 PA to Alex Cintron. Those stats should have told him that Joel Hanrahan was not fit for the closer role. Those stats should have told him that defense is part of the game and that it is a terrible idea to ignore it. The guy is overmatched as a manager. Cleveland fans will realize that within 2 months.

Big Oil
Big Oil

I agree, but to play devil’s advocate, it wasn’t like Bowden was making Jack-Z-like acquisitions for the skipper to deploy. Acta didn’t shop for the groceries. Playing Kearns was pretty inexcusable, but there was some thought that he may play well enough to return some value. Clearly, that didn’t work.

Hanrahan ultimately proved (good?) enough to acquire Tony Plush, and I don’t think that, in light of production gained from him so far vis a vis performance of Milledge and the arsonist in Pittsburgh, it was terrible judgment to continue running him out there. There may be some merit to this in light of the fact that he ran a .392 BABIP for the season (I don’t recall what it was before he left DC). Maybe Manny thought it would regress. But Julian Tavarez is a pretty good alternative, right? 6.94 BB/9!!

I think my larger point is that it would have been nice to see Acta in DC during a period of time where the front office was competent.