Copying the World Champs

Over the past two seasons, the Royals have gained a reputation for smart baserunning, lethal relief pitching, a contact-heavy offensive approach and excellent defense. Now that they’ve appeared in two consecutive World Series and are the reigning champions of baseball, it’s time for other teams to recognize the value in that formula and do the only thing they can: copy them! Home runs are out. Ace pitchers are out. It’s singles and relievers from here on out, folks. Or until a different team wins next season.

Copying the Royals isn’t too difficult in theory because they have such a well-defined style of play. It’s all those things I just mentioned in the first sentence. If you were watching the World Series you probably noticed how the announcers talked on and on about how the Royals never strike out, play great defense, run the bases with aplomb, and possess a bullpen full of great relievers. So now that the goal is clear, and the means are known. Who is in the best position to copy the Royals?

To find out, I went through this year’s team stats and foudn the top 10 teams in each of the Royals’ favorite categories: team defense, relief pitching, baserunning, and, on offense, fewest strikeouts. Then I assigned each a value based on the ranking (first place in a category received 10 points, second place 9, and so on). Then I added up the value for each team over the category. Is this scientific? No, not close, but it’s hopefully a good shorthanded version of who might be closest to being as Royalsy as the actual Royals. So, who was most like the Royals?

The Royalsyest Team
Defense Relief Base Running Avoiding Ks TOTAL
1 Royals 10 6 0 10 26
2 Indians 8 5 5 3 21
3 Cubs 2 7 9 0 18
4 Rangers 6 0 10 0 16
5 Diamondbacks 5 0 8 0 13
6 Astros 0 9 4 0 13
7 Giants 9 0 0 2 11
8 Orioles 0 10 0 0 10
9 Blue Jays 0 0 6 4 10
10 Angels 4 0 0 5 9
11 Yankees 0 8 0 1 9
12 Braves 0 0 0 9 9
13 A’s 0 0 0 8 8
14 Rays 7 0 0 0 7
15 Marlins 1 0 0 6 7
16 Reds 0 0 7 0 7
17 Red Sox 0 0 0 7 7
18 Pirates 0 4 0 0 4
19 Tigers 3 0 0 0 3
20 Cardinals 0 3 0 0 3
21 Mets 0 0 3 0 3
22 Dodgers 0 2 0 0 2
23 Padres 0 0 2 0 2
24 Brewers 0 1 0 0 1
25 Rockies 0 0 1 0 1

As it turns out, the Royals were most like the Royals. If you just listened to the media then it’s perhaps a bit shocking that this isn’t all a media-created narrative. It’s been written about and blabbed about seemingly forever, but if you watched the postseason then you likely know the Royals really are excellent defensively, fantastic at avoiding strikeouts, and they do have an incredibly strong pen.

Even so, the Royals aren’t exactly the Royals, at least not according to what we’ve been told. They weren’t in the top 10 best base running teams this season and in fact, they weren’t close. They finished 19th in our Base Running category (a combination of UBR with wSB and wGDP). They weren’t particularly fantastic last season, either — though they were better, finishing 10th. The Royals ran the bases effectively during the postseason, and especially so during the World Series, but it’s not not hard to envision a world where Lucas Duda’s 90-foot throw wasn’t put-me-at-DH-now level awful and Eric Hosmer was out by about five feet.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The Royals get credit for the play because they made it, because they pushed the proverbial envelope, and also because they were cognizant of the competition they were up against. Maybe against the Dodgers and Adrian Gonzalez Hosmer doesn’t try to score. Or maybe he does and he’s out by five feet and we’re not talking about the Royals’ great propensity for chance-taking and seizing the moment. Instead we’re marveling at what a boneheaded play Hosmer made to get thrown out at home to end a World Series game.

But even with all that, even with some #Narrative thrown in for flavor, as the chart shows, the Royals are the real deal. They play great defense, have great relievers, especially towards the back of the pen where it matters more during the postseason, and they do put the ball in play more than any other team. The value of that was discussed by  Ben Lindbergh in a piece at the (dearly departed) Grantland recently, but the short version is high-contact players might play better against power pitchers, like say how the Royals did against the Mets.

So on to the chart. As you can clearly see, the non-Royals team with the highest Royalsyiest score is the Indians. What’s more, unlike the Royals themselves, the Indians score across the board in every category, just not quite as high. They’re a top defensive team and likely to get better with full seasons of Francisco Lindor, Lonnie Chisenhall, and potentially some more from Roberto Perez and Giovanny Urshela. Their bullpen features top relievers Cody Allen and Zach McAllister, who could potentially stand in for a Wade Davis or a Luke Hochevar come playoff time, and a bunch of their regulars are plus baserunners. On top of that, the Indians feature something the Royals don’t — or didn’t for most of the year, depending on what you think of Johnny Cueto: ace-level starting pitching with Carlos Carrasco and Corey Kluber.

The thing is, though, I’ve assigned numbers based on rankings which doesn’t quite do justice to what the Royals have accomplished in 2015. For example, by our defensive metrics, the difference between the first-place Royals and the second-place Giants is greater than the difference between the second place Giants and the 16th-place Mets. With regard to relief performance, by which category the Royals are further down the list, the opposite is true, as there is a large bunch of teams with similarly effective bullpens generating similar value. The second-place Astros, for example, had 5.3 WAR while the third-place Yankees had 5.2, and the fourth-/fifth-place Cubs and Royals had 5.0. There’s not much in the way of difference there.

Team strikeouts are the same way, as the Royals struck out just 973 times this season, the fewest in baseball. The team with the next fewest strikeouts was the Braves, but they struck out 1107 times, 134 more than Kansas City. Being the best at one thing is great, but if you’re only marginally better than your competition the value is muted. The Royals did what they did and they did it, for the most part, much better than any other team in baseball.

Of course, as we are likely to forget amidst all the fawning over the most recently crowned World Champs, speed, defense, and relief pitching isn’t the only formula to building a World Series-winning team. The Mets finished third from last on only one of those lists and it was base-running, the least valuable of any, and they made the World Series. Heck, they even beat the Royals once! Last season the Giants did it with hitting and Madison Bumgarner. The year before, the Red Sox did it with hitting, starting pitching, and Jonny Gomes‘ magic team happy powder.

Still, if you were to pick a team that might be able, through a few slight additions to its roster, to best emulate this year’s championship Royals squad, the Indians are probably that team. Perhaps adding Darren O’Day while moving Carlos Santana to DH to bring in a better fielding first baseman would yield greater benefits for Cleveland than we know. With a little tweaking Cleveland could be the next Royals. That is, unless the Royals do it again.





25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Dayton Moore
10 years ago

When do I get my kudos?

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
10 years ago
Reply to  Dayton Moore

Sorry, ate them all.

But you can have all the Double Bubble that was left over from Halloween.

Balls Up
10 years ago
Reply to  Dayton Moore

Congratulations. Your team was terrible enough that you had year after year of early 1st round picks which you used to acquire all of your core players.

Except your shortstop/lead-off man, who amassed a superstar worthy .293 OBP.

You’re a freaking genius, Dayton.

Slats
10 years ago

The Royals led all of MLB in Defensive Runs Saved by almost double the second team. They also put the ball in play a lot which gives opponents who are not as good defensively more opportunities to not make plays. Their home ballpark suppresses HR’s which punishes them a whole lot less than teams who relay more on HR’s. Lastly, the bullpen is undervalued by most valuation metrics due to leverage issues.

Fangraphs writers and their readers/commenters should be celebrating the ultimate triumph of defensive metrics instead of moping around about how they don’t understand what just happened or what happened last year or in 2012 or in 2010.

The most amazing thing about all this is not that so many Fangraphs writers and readers/commenters got it wrong on the Royals. It’s that their own metrics got it right and they don’t seem to realize it!

kdl
10 years ago
Reply to  Slats

The Royals basically “caused” a league average number of errors with their contact hitting. They were also below average on the bases.
How do you square these facts with your ‘contact hitting leads to more runs’ theory?

Typical Internet Giants fan
10 years ago

Why do the Giants rank so low in avoiding Ks? They had the third-lowest strikeout percentage in baseball, and the difference between them and the Royals is almost entirely due to the 128 Ks from their pitchers (the Royals had 10 pitcher strikeouts, for comparison).

I demand a full – FULL – retraction and apology. How dare you, sir. How dare you have a different baseball opinion on the internet.

Joe W
10 years ago

Nice work, Matthew. I like the simplicity of your method. However, summing up z-scores for the 4 categories perhaps would have given us a more accurate answer to the “Royalsiest” team and would avoid the issue you mentioned concerning the Royals super awesome defense. It would still be pretty simple.

JimBob
10 years ago

You can’t really copy them, nor should you try, because it involves too much going right. You can’t just go out there and find dominating relievers, because they are so fungible. Herrera and Davis can just be bought. Also, team defense is not a good thing to rely on year to year.

Smelly Muslim
10 years ago
Reply to  JimBob

“Also, team defense is not a good thing to rely on year to year.”

Laughably stupid. Defensive metrics often change drastically from year to year, but that is because the public formulas are imprecise. Actual individual defensive ability does change change materially from year to year.

Jim Price
10 years ago
Reply to  Smelly Muslim

And you have facts to prove this?

RollTribe
10 years ago

Don’t forget advanced scouting, which the Indians excel at!! (Assuming they still have the same crew from 2007 that preyed upon Joba’s weakness against gnats)

tz
10 years ago

If you replace “base running” with “base stealing”, the Royals were #4 in wSB.

kdl
10 years ago
Reply to  tz

And if you compare them only to teams from Missouri they are the worst team in the league!

brad pitt
10 years ago

Why did I play Billy Beane? He only won 1 playoff series. Shoulda played Dayton Moore, he won 5

Jon
10 years ago
Reply to  brad pitt

Do you just change your username and post this same comment on every post? I can’t imagine how vacant your life must be.

baycommuter
10 years ago
Reply to  brad pitt

Easy. Brad Pitt only plays people who are almost as good-looking as he is.

woodsmeister
10 years ago

Where’s the category for destiny/luck?

TerenceMember since 2016
10 years ago

I assume that for team defense you just used team UZR? I understand why a Fangraphs writer would do that, but as we examine team defense, we need to acknowledge that UZR is a terrible instrument for measuring success of teams that shift abundantly. If you use team DRS the new leaderboard is:

Royals 25
Astros 20
Indians 18
Diamondbacks 18

Imagine trying to tell people that the Astros are the most Royalsiest team. That destroys some narratives.

Ernie Camacho
10 years ago

Fun post, but per Jeff’s simultaneous piece, what really sets the Royals apart is the voodoo clutch. And that’s where the Tribe falls off the list.

Al Dimond
10 years ago

Something seems off when the Cubs finish 3rd. This is the team the Mets just swept with a barrage of strikeouts, a team that lives on homers and dies on strikeouts, with a pitching staff anchored by a starter on a dominant run.

Probably the reason they end up this way is that their strikeouts aren’t counted against them any more than if they were 11th in strikeout rate. The Astros, another notable three-true-outcomes team, are up at 6th.

For a simple improvement using team ranks, maybe use a “distance formula” calculation instead of track meet scoring. That comes out:

1. Indians (3, 6, 6, 7 = 11.4)
2. Blue Jays (14, 11, 5, 5 = 19.16)
3. Royals (1, 5, 19, 1 = 19.7)
4. Marlins (10, 14, 16, 9 = 25.16)
5. Cardinals (11, 8, 15, 15 = 25.2)
6. Yankees (21, 3, 11, 10 = 25.9)
7. Rangers (5, 24, 1, 11 = 26.89)
8. Angels (7, 17, 18, 8 = 26.94)
9. Diamondbacks (6, 21, 3, 17 = 27.84)
10. Giants (2, 22, 17, 6 = 28.51)
11. Mets (17, 13, 8, 18 = 29.09)
12. Cubs (9, 4, 2, 30 = 31.64)
13. Reds (22, 19, 4, 12 = 31.7)
14. Astros (19, 2, 7, 29 = 35.43)
15. Red Sox (12, 30, 14, 4 = 35.44)
16. Dodgers (16, 9, 26, 16 = 35.62)
17. Pirates (27, 7, 12, 20 = 36.36)
18. Brewers (23, 10, 13, 23 = 36.43)
19. Braves (13, 29, 23, 3 = 39.34)
20. Rockies (25, 20, 10, 22 = 40.11)
21. Orioles (15, 1, 25, 28 = 40.44)
22. Nationals (20, 12, 22, 26 = 41.28)
23. Twins (18, 23, 24, 19 = 42.31)
24. Athletics (26, 27, 20, 2 = 42.53)
25. Phillies (28, 15, 21, 21 = 43.49)
26. Tigers (8, 28, 30, 14 = 44.09)
27. Padres (29, 18, 9, 27 = 44.44)
28. Rays (4, 25, 28, 24 = 44.73)
29. White Sox (30, 16, 27, 13 = 45.32)
30. Mariners (34, 26, 29, 25 = 52.13)

Heh, the Royals are “killed” by their mediocre baserunning.

Even this might overrate the Cubs’ and Astros’ Royals-ness, or their prospects for more Royals-ness. Their teams are built around young strikeout-prone sluggers. Defense and baserunning tend to decline with age. And relief performance is particularly fickle. Also the Cubs and Royals are strikeout outliers in opposite directions, which z-scores might capture better than my rank-and-distance-formula method. As it is, my method doesn’t give the Royals nearly enough credit for their most Royals-y quality. Accounting for a team’s roster plans is probably best left for a qualitative article, though.

Bobaloo
10 years ago

A team of highly capable consistent grinders …

Steven
10 years ago

Not to be that guy, but “To find out, I went through this year’s team stats and foudn the top 10 teams in each” should obviously say “found”.

I did enjoy the article though!

dbminn
10 years ago

Great article for starting a conversation. Two data comments:

As others have said, defensive value is a bit sketchy these days considering all of the shifts. Hope this can be resolved with better public data in the near future.

fWAR is not a good indicator of reliever effectiveness. WPA needs to be factored into the equation. Not saying eliminate fWAR – some sort of combination. As a test of this – would you trade the Royals or Pirates bullpen for the Astros or Cubs bullpen?

Based on WPA instead of fWAR, I believe the Rangers move closer to the Royals model. The Indians move farther away – their existing bullpen has had too many meltdowns compared to shutdowns, especially McAllister. I’d say they have to add two relievers in the offseason.

DatabasesLoaded
10 years ago

I totally agree about the semi-competent throw gets Hosmer. Any fair observer would agree.

However, I also think that in such a play, having d’Arnaud standing just behind home plate instead of just in front of home plate, combined with a semi-competent throw, gets Hosmer by even more, because the catcher would not have to sweep back to apply the tag.

I still think the Mets overachieved this season, so I was happy to see them in the World Series at all. I also saw them as underdogs and could not figure out why they kept getting put as favorite in the odds listings – even though I think all the talk of Royals as #BestTeamEver are exaggerated.

I don’t think they should try to copy the Royals, as some other teams may do. But they can do a lot better in neutralizing the imbalances that the Royals bring to the game. The Mets have to work on putting away hitters with two strikes, to begin with. And, of course, defense, speculations about the Duda throw notwithstanding.

DatabasesLoaded
10 years ago

all the talk … *is* exaggerated – sorry, subject-verb disagreement. :-p