COVID-19 Roundup: Players, Executives, Experts Weigh in on Health Protocols

This is the latest installment of a series in which the FanGraphs staff rounds up the latest developments regarding the COVID-19 virus’ effect on baseball.

MLB’s Extensive List of Health and Safety Protocols Is Being Dissected

Last Saturday, a 67-page document laying out all of the health and safety measures considered necessary for a 2020 major league season was reported by The Athletic. In the week since, voices from inside baseball as well as the public health and epidemiology fields have weighed in on what the proposal means, where it goes too far, and where it falls short.

Beginning with medical experts — since they really are the most important voice here — the perspective seems to be that MLB’s proposal is extensive and thoughtful, but the actual execution of it will be challenging. That was the sentiment communicated by Andy McCullough and Marc Carig in a story for The Athletic that ran Thursday. Part of the challenge could be ensuring that measures are taken as seriously as they should be for as long as possible. If MLB’s protocols are effective, it will mean the virus isn’t spreading throughout clubhouses. That will make the threat seem less dangerous, which could lead to people letting their guard down and no longer following the rules as closely.

Troublingly, the steps toward that false sense of security has already begun. In a report by ESPN’s Jesse Rogers, players openly wondered why so many restrictions would be necessary in an environment where everyone has tested negative for the virus. As doctors have warned, however, false negatives exist, and allowing everyone to proceed with life as normal would be very risky regardless of test results.

The biggest issue in the minds of medical experts and players alike, however, appears to be the frequency of testing. In a story by ESPN, Mike Trout stated, “I don’t see us playing without testing every day.” That’s an important specification, because the initial proposal merely called for “regular” testing, with the only daily measure being temperature checks. Medical professionals are clear about the fact that people can be asymptomatic carriers of the virus for multiple days before even showing a higher temperature, which means that letting even a single day go by without a test could have enormous consequences.

When the players union responded to MLB’s proposal yesterday, testing was one of the issues put forth.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Daily testing presents the same logistical challenges it always has, though. There still aren’t enough supplies for MLB to use that number of tests without depriving health professionals and others in need. Other topics referenced by Drellich, such as pre- and postgame therapy access, echoed what was reported by Ken Rosenthal as potential changes that executives wanted to see in future drafts of MLB’s proposal.

Overall, the disagreements and misunderstandings here seem small compared to the battles over player pay. In the case of health and safety, however, most parties seem to be pulling in the same direction. Stated Paul DeJong to ESPN, “There were a lot of rules and infrastructure to get in place and enforce … we’ll find the right mix. We can pull this off.”

Cubs, Pirates Implement Pay Cuts

Employees of the Chicago Cubs will face pay cuts of 10-35%, with the majority of cuts being over 20%. The Pittsburgh Pirates, meanwhile, have instituted pay cuts of 5-25% throughout their organization, in addition to furloughing about 20% of employees. Those furloughed by the Pirates are said to be those most impacted by not having fans in the ballpark for the foreseeable future, and do not include anyone in baseball operations.

Four Teams Announce Extensions in Pay, Benefits

Employees of a few organizations did receive some good news on Thursday, however. From Rosenthal and Dan Connolly:

In addition to these four teams, the Phillies, Tigers, Rockies and Padres had already indicated they will be paying employees well past the end of May.

International Players Not Subject To Two-Week Quarantine Upon Return

According to Tim Brown of Yahoo! Sports, international players who return to the United States for the 2020 season after spending the last two months in their home countries will not be asked to quarantine for the 14-day period recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Instead, they will be subject to the screening and testing given to domestic players.

By not requiring international players to quarantine for two weeks, those players will now have a longer period of time to sort out travel matters as MLB and the MLBPA continue to sort out the details of a season that still has no guarantee of happening.

Nationals to Hold Virtual Ring Ceremony

The Washington Nationals will record a virtual ring ceremony on Saturday and broadcast the event at 7 PM Sunday, celebrating their 2019 World Series title. It will air on MASN and MLB Network.

The date of the ceremony’s broadcast is no accident, as it falls on the one-year anniversary of the Nationals’ 19-31 record last season. The ceremony will also be used to raise money for the NATS4GOOD Community Response Fund.

Most players, coaches, staff and broadcasters won’t receive their rings until a later date. According to Brittany Ghiroli, that’s made some in the organization unhappy, as it creates a situation in which some players will have to see the ring for the first time via Zoom call, in the hands of teammates or coaches instead of their own.





Tony is a contributor for FanGraphs. He began writing for Red Reporter in 2016, and has also covered prep sports for the Times West Virginian and college sports for Ohio University's The Post. He can be found on Twitter at @_TonyWolfe_.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
lukeMember since 2024
6 years ago

The owners need to get to trump and make him fund testing and organize testing. There will be riots if players are tested daily while medical professionals still can’t be tested even weekly. We don’t test them at all actually, in most places, unless they show symptoms.

This whole thing is ridiculous. How can business leaders follow blindly down this road without putting political pressure on the folks that can make it happen? Namely the feds. The trump feds who pretend the virus is already gone.

bglick4
6 years ago
Reply to  luke

We’re testing like 300,000 people a day (Though with so many states bizarrely mixing in antibody tests, this might be high, I have no idea). But, if this is true, another 1500 a day is a blip. Around me, the testing is not limited by the number of tests but by people to test on. I find it hard to believe that, barring a resurgence, we will be unable to test everyone every day. And, if there’s a resurgence, this isn’t happening regardless.

Max Power
6 years ago
Reply to  luke

NY is testing around 40k a day but has capacity for 90k. Governor Cuomo is trying very hard to get more people to get tested, but the main hold-up is people don’t really want to

Robert JungmanMember since 2020
6 years ago

I am so sorry for all who have been furloughed or taken pay cuts. Hopefully MLB can return in some form safely and soon!

Billsaints
6 years ago

Wonder if the Jays are being helped by the Government of Canada. They are not laying off staff, I assume they are eligable to have 75% of their pay covered by the govt. as they have lost over 30% of their revenue. Would that cover baseball players too?

The Stranger
6 years ago

I’d like to hear the public health officials weigh in on whether a positive test should result in not just the player testing positive isolating until they recover, but also teammates, coaches, and opponents isolating as a precaution. For months, we’ve been hearing that people who had contact with an infected person should isolate for 14 days. That was my assumption early on, and why I didn’t think a season could be played, but it appears MLB isn’t going to do that. I’d really like to see an expert opinion on whether MLB’s protocol actually reduces the risk of transmission during a baseball game to negligible levels so that isolation isn’t necessary, or if it’s just wishful thinking on MLB’s part.

docgooden85Member since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  The Stranger

A bunch of people are just giving up out of fatigue. It isn’t now and mostly hasn’t been very rational. A lot of guessing and feelings on all sides really. I’m more worried about the pay fight than the Covid details which ultimately will get solved if need be.

The Stranger
6 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

I agree with that. I’m just curious whether it will be resolved in a way that is actually based on sound medical advice, or resolved because there’s too much money on the table and everybody is sick of quarantining.

martyvan90Member since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  The Stranger

Interesting how based on “based on sound medical advice” has come into our language post COVID-19. I suspect it means different things to different people. If the goal is zero infection rate that’s a certain standard, if it’s catching outbreaks quickly that’s a different standard.
Also interesting how we generally accepted “sheltering in place” yet we’re not aggressively leveraging cell phone technology and enforced quarantining for COVID positives. That’s been a major key to successful COVID containment in Asia but here we cite it but refuse to do it. We are a nation of paradoxes.

McPontiffMember since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  martyvan90

One thing that this whole fiasco has shown us is “based on sound medical advice” has lost all meaning, and that comes from the “top” (WHO, CDC, Dr Fauci et. al.) on downwards. Much of the errors in their earlier models hardened firmly into cement, and aided by daily media repetition, remains even in the face of more thorough and accurate recent data. One of these tenets is the idea that asymptomatic ‘carriers’ are contagious; this was never proven conclusively as we were erring on the side of caution. And it is still ‘debatable’, which is the exact language used in the Abstract of a new study calling into question the dangers of being asymptomatic https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32405162/?fbclid=IwAR2yObtSioeMA7o8feDiXshbamTkx3IvX4ONgdEXUE3CQ2ceZI56R_sRF6Q

The GuruMember since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

no people are not just giving up. Theyre seeing the data and making rational decisions. This isn’t ebola with a 90% kill rate, we shouldve never shut down. This has a .2% kill rate. 2% kill rate when comparing against the people that tested positive for it.

But as we all know, the majority of people with the virus are asymptomatic and don’t get tested because they don’t know they have it. This would bring the kill rate down an order of magnitude as the cases of people with Covid are significantly higher than the people that have tested positive for it.

Should’ve been playing ball a long time ago. Also this effects the elderly mostly….these athletes are in the best shape of all us citizens and theyre young. PLAY BALL!

The Stranger
6 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

So… everything you say is true, but I disagree with your conclusion. Yes, the mortality rate for this thing is somewhere under 1%. And for people without risk factors, it’s much lower. So for any individual person, especially a person who is young and otherwise healthy, the odds are overwhelmingly in your favor. If you’re out there ignoring all social distancing guidelines on the theory that you’ll be fine, there is probably at least a 99.9% chance that you are correct.

But that still adds up to a LOT of dead people. If the mortality rate is even 0.1%, that’s something like 3 million dead in the US. Maybe 2 million if you assume that many people will never be exposed, either way it’s a lot. And the only way to avoid that is for all of us to acknowledge that even though we’ll probably be fine, other people won’t be, and do our part by staying away from other people for a while.

I didn’t downvote, and I don’t judge anybody who’s looking at this and thinking they’re ready to take their chances. We’re not really wired to think about illness outside of the context of ourselves and people close to us getting sick. 330 million people is a number that we can’t even comprehend. Even 3 million dead means that many Americans wouldn’t know anybody who died from it, or maybe one or two people who were in poor health already. And right now we’re still an order of magnitude below that.

Right now, most people’s experience is “I lost my job” and/or “I’m stuck at home with three kids.” That sucks, don’t get me wrong. And it’s really tempting to generalize from that experience and say that the cure is worse than the disease. I’d disagree with you, though.

The Stranger
6 years ago
Reply to  The Stranger

Grr… screwed up my math. 0.1% is only 300,000, not 3 million. Still a lot, but not millions. But that’s probably low. Right now we’re at 100,000 dead with maybe 5% of the population having been exposed based on limited antibody testing. That’s closer to 0.6%, which gets you right back into potentially killing millions of people.

David ParsonsMember since 2020
6 years ago

Allowing players to enter the country from, say the Dominican Republic or Venezuela, without quarantining when everyone else has to may not go over so well; similar to the Brooklyn Nets getting tested when others couldn’t.

The GuruMember since 2026
6 years ago

We shouldve been playing a long time ago. Decision makers need to get out of manhatten and take the blinders off.